The Informant!
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Suits Season 3 Episode 5 Polystream
Suits season 3 episode 5 polystream Harvey and Mike try to find a way to get Cameron removed as the prosecutor of Ava's case. When Stephen learns of their plan he offers to help and even bets. Harap verifikasi akun kamu!Verifikasi. Nonton Online Video Film Lucu, Unik dan Menarik, Gratis di. Watch Suits S03E05 Shadow of a Doubt Online here on Putlocker for free. Watch Suits Season 3 Episode 5: Shadow of a Doubt Online Free - Putlocker. Summary: (Shadow Of A Doubt): You can watch Suits Season 3 Episode 5 online here at Tv Show "Suits" s3e5 (Shadow Of A Doubt). Suits. Watch Suits season 3 episode 5 (S03E05) online free (NO SIGN UP) only at TVZion, largest online tv episode database. Updated everyday. Watch Online Suits Season 3 HD with Subtitles Suits Online Streaming with hd free watch Suits Season 3 online with captions suits hd free streaming europix. Episode 3 - "Unfinished Business" Episode 4 - "Conflict of Interest" Episode 5. Stream Suits S03E05 full episode on TVRaven. Stream all 16 Suits season 3 episodes TVRaven free. Watch Suits Season 3 Episode 5 Online – Free Streaming Suits S03E06 Shadow Of A Doubt Full Episode Lines involving the private as well as the. Watch Suits Season 3 Episode 5 Online. In Suits, one of Manhattan's top corporate lawyers (Gabriel Macht) sets out to recruit a new hotshot associate and hires. Suits - Season 3: The third season opens with a shift in the dynamics at the firm. Scroll down and click to choose episode/server you want to watch. -
Suits Episode Scripts 1-1 수정본 N/A - Pilot
1 Suits Episode Scripts 1-1 수정본 N/A - Pilot 자료원: http://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/view_episode_scripts.php?tv- show=suits&episode=s01e01 (Q1) Gerald Tate's here. He wants to know what's happening to his deal. Go get Harvey. I check. Raise. 5,000. I'm all in. You can pay me later. I've got to go. Gentlemen. I'm paying you millions. And you're telling me I'm going to get screwed? Jessica, have I come at a bad time? Gerald, this is Harvey Specter. He's our best closer. Well, if you're the best closer, where the hell have you been for the last three hours? Well, Gerald, I specialize in troubled situations, and when I left here at 7:00 p.m. this deal wasn't in jeopardy. So, I'm just trying to figure out what happened in the interim. We keep offering more money. They keep rejecting it. It's last-minute bad faith bullshit. It says here that Cooper won't be staying on as honorary Vice President. That's right. I don't want him around. He wouldn't be around. It's an honorary position. I don't give a shit. 2 Well, I think you do, because that's what's changed since I left, which means it's you who's been dealing in bad faith. Well, now that you've got a grasp on what's happened in the goddamn interim, what are you going to do about it? Because he's not getting that title. -
Confidential Informants in Private Litigation: Balancing Interests in Anonymity and Disclosure
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANTS IN PRIVATE LITIGATION: BALANCING INTERESTS IN ANONYMITY AND DISCLOSURE Ethan D. Wohl∗ ABSTRACT Heightened pleading standards and limits on discovery in private securities fraud actions make confidential informants crucial in many cases. While courts have widely recognized the importance of confidential informants and the need to protect them from retaliation, they have not applied consistent standards as to how informants must be identified in pleadings, and have failed to take into account substantial bodies of relevant case law when deciding whether to require the disclosure of informants’ names in discovery. This article offers a framework for deciding when and how confidential informants should be identified, taking into account the competing interests in anonymity and disclosure. It offers a refined standard for identifying informants at the pleading stage that focuses on how the employee came to have the information pleaded, rather than on the employee’s job title or duties. It also proposes use of in camera review of witness statements. At the discovery stage, this article criticizes the use of the attorney work product doctrine as a basis for protecting informant identities. It argues that courts should perform a balancing analysis that directly weighs public policy and privacy interests in favor of informant anonymity against defendants’ legitimate needs for disclosure. This approach is supported by numerous cases protecting the identities of informants and other types of witnesses under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), and also finds support in the many cases construing the formal privilege applicable to government informants. Finally, this article encourages plaintiffs to seek protective orders for informants early in litigation and briefly discusses protection for witness interview notes. -
Civil Nature of Suit Code Descriptions (Rev
Civil Nature of Suit Code Descriptions (Rev. 04/21) Contract Code Title Description 110 Insurance Action alleging breach of insurance contract, tort claim, or other cause related to an insurance contract, except for maritime insurance contracts. 120 Marine Action (Admiralty or Maritime) based on service, employment, insurance or other contracts relating to maritime vessels and other maritime contractual matters. 130 Miller Act Action based on performance and payment bonds agreed to by contractors on federal construction projects as required under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3131-3134. 140 Negotiable Instrument Action relating to an agreement to pay a specific amount of money, including promissory notes, loan agreements and checks. 150 Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcement Action to recover debt owed to the United States, including Judgment enforcement of judgments, based on overpayments and restitution agreements involving matters other than Medicare benefits, student loans and veterans’ benefits. 151 Medicare Action relating to Medicare payments, including actions for payments of benefits, to recover overpayments, and for judicial review of administrative decisions. 152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans Action to recover debt owed to the United States from defaulted (Excludes Veterans) student loan. 153 Recovery of Overpayment of Veterans' Action relating to payments of veterans’ benefits, primarily including Benefits actions to recover overpayments. 160 Stockholders' Suits Action brought by stockholder(s) of a corporation (including -
Mark Whitacre, Ph.D
FEATURE CLE: WHEN GOOD LEADERS LOSE THEIR WAY Sponsor: Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP CLE Credit: 1.0 Thursday, June 22, 2017 1:25 p.m. - 2:25 p.m. Exhibit Hall 2 Owensboro Convention Center Owensboro, Kentucky A NOTE CONCERNING THE PROGRAM MATERIALS The materials included in this Kentucky Bar Association Continuing Legal Education handbook are intended to provide current and accurate information about the subject matter covered. No representation or warranty is made concerning the application of the legal or other principles discussed by the instructors to any specific fact situation, nor is any prediction made concerning how any particular judge or jury will interpret or apply such principles. The proper interpretation or application of the principles discussed is a matter for the considered judgment of the individual legal practitioner. The faculty and staff of this Kentucky Bar Association CLE program disclaim liability therefore. Attorneys using these materials, or information otherwise conveyed during the program, in dealing with a specific legal matter have a duty to research original and current sources of authority. Printed by: Evolution Creative Solutions 7107 Shona Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 Kentucky Bar Association TABLE OF CONTENTS The Presenter ........................................................................................................ i When Good Leaders Lose Their Way ................................................................... 1 Just Imagine for a Minute .......................................................................... -
THE MARK WHITACRE STORY Finishing Well By: Mark Whitaker
THE MARK WHITACRE STORY Finishing Well By: Mark Whitaker We all make mistakes. Day in, day out we are subject to our frail human tendencies, as the Apostle Paul wrote, “For I do not do the good I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing.” Even as fully committed Christians, we don’t always make the right choices, some of which can have far-reaching consequences. But through God’s amazing grace, we can seek forgiveness, repent and move on and He is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. It’s the next steps that truly define us. As Jazz great Miles Davis said, "When you hit a wrong note, it's the next note that makes it good or bad." Few of us have made a mistake that has landed us in a Federal Penitentiary but that’s exactly where Mark Whitacre found himself. A rising young executive at a Fortune 500 company, Mark was on track to lead the company when poor judgment and high-level corruption brought his world crashing down around him. That could have been the end of his story, but that was just the beginning. 34 | 3rd Quarter Finishing Well: The Mark Whitacre Story TwoTenMagazine.com TwoTen Magazine | 35 was promoted to corporate vice president and corporate officer before he joined them but he quickly learned their elaborate and was positioned to take over as COO and president. techniques. They were stealing a billion dollars each year from The Driven Scholar their large food and beverage customers, and that increased cost Mark recalled, “My base salary and stock options combined was being passed on to consumers. -
Retaliatory RICO and the Puzzle of Fraudulent Claiming
Michigan Law Review Volume 115 Issue 5 2017 Retaliatory RICO and the Puzzle of Fraudulent Claiming Nora Freeman Engstrom Stanford Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Litigation Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Nora Freeman Engstrom, Retaliatory RICO and the Puzzle of Fraudulent Claiming, 115 MICH. L. REV. 639 (2017). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol115/iss5/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RETALIATORY RICO AND THE PUZZLE OF FRAUDULENT CLAIMING Nora Freeman Engstrom* Over the past century, the allegation that the tort liability system incentivizes legal extortion and is chock-full of fraudulent claims has dominated public discussion and prompted lawmakers to ever-more-creatively curtail individu- als’ incentives and opportunities to seek redress. Unsatisfied with these con- ventional efforts, in recent years, at least a dozen corporate defendants have “discovered” a new fraud-fighting tool. They’ve started filing retaliatory RICO suits against plaintiffs and their lawyers and experts, alleging that the initia- tion of certain nonmeritorious litigation constitutes racketeering activity— while tort reform advocates have applauded these efforts and exhorted more “courageous” companies to follow suit. Curiously, though, all of this has taken place against a virtual empirical void. Is the tort liability system actually brimming with fraudulent claims? No one knows. -
Working Paper
Working Paper Breaking up is Hard to Do: Determinants of Cartel Duration Margaret C. Levenstein Stephen M. Ross School of Business University of Michigan Valerie Y. Suslow Stephen M. Ross School of Business University of Michigan Ross School of Business Working Paper Working Paper No. 1150 September 2010 This work cannot be used without the author's permission. This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Sciences Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1676968 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Determinants of Cartel Duration Margaret C. Levenstein Valerie Y. Suslow* September 2010 Forthcoming, Journal of Law and Economics * Margaret Levenstein is Executive Director of the Michigan Census Research Data Center; Research Scientist, Institute for Social Research; and Adjunct Professor, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan ([email protected]). Valerie Suslow is Professor of Business Economics and Public Policy, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan ([email protected]). We thank Charlie Brown, John Connor, Joseph Harrington, Francine Lafontaine, Kirtikumar Mehta, Maarten Pieter Schinkel, and Wesley Wilson for helpful comments. We also thank seminar participants at the International Industrial Organization Conference, Ross School of Business, University of East Anglia, and Barnard College. Excellent research assistance was provided by S. Aneeqa Aqeel, Sara LaLumia, and Nathan Wilson. ABSTRACT We estimate the impact of cartel organizational features, as well as macroeconomic fluctuations and industry structure, on cartel duration using a dataset of contemporary international cartels. We estimate a proportional hazards model with competing risks, distinguishing factors which increase the risk of “death by antitrust” from those that affect “natural death,” including defection, dissension or entry. -
10.01 Econ 243 Notes
Econ 243 notes October 1, 2018 • The Informant on Netflix. Edited by MSmitka from Wikipedia: The Informant! is a 2009 American biographical-comedy-crime film directed by Steven Soderbergh. Written by Scott Z. Burns, the film stars Matt Damon as the titular informant named Mark Whitacre, a rising star at the Archer Daniels Midland, as well as Scott Bakula, Joel McHale and Melanie Lynskey. It depicts Whitacre's involvement as a whistle blower in the lysine price-fixing conspiracy of the mid-1990s as described in the 2000 nonfiction book The Informant, by journalist Kurt Eichenwald. --- … In 1993, Archer Daniels Midland was the subject of a lysine price-fixing investigation by the U.S. Justice Department. Senior ADM executives were indicted on criminal charges for engaging in price-fixing within the international market. Three of ADM's top officials, including [their] vice chairman ... were eventually sentenced to federal prison in 1999. Moreover, in 1997, the company was fined $100 million, the largest antitrust fine in U.S. history at the time. … In addition, according to ADM's 2005 annual report, a settlement was reached under which ADM paid $400 million in 2005 to settle a class action antitrust suit. • Enough for our purposes with 2-firm models. Illustrate a range of strategies, and looked at factors that might affect the choice of one over another. Implication of our n-firm oligopoly firm π* = (p*-c)q* = (a-c)2/(n+1)2b with fixed costs F we then want to find n such that π*-F is positive also want size of market parameter S ←→ p = S (a - bq) but this just multiplies quantities in equilibrium, and profits, while leaving price the same. -
Informant Liability Issues
ICJE, P.O. Box 293, Montgomery, AL 36101 * 334-280-0020 ICJE Feature Article, July 14, 2003, updated January 2, 2012 Informant Liability Issues Robert T. Thetford, J.D. Introduction We see the headlines all too often in newspapers throughout the country, headlines about legal actions against federal or state officers, accusing them of conduct which if true, causes embarrassment to all of us in the profession and in some real sense lessens our ability to do our jobs. Recent headlines like “Grand jury hearing fake-drug lawsuits,” and “LA Police in Reign of Terror Against Minorities” along with scores of similar articles have a common thread: the abuse of their position by criminal informants or the misuse of criminal informants or sources by law enforcement personnel, resulting in legal action which almost always proves detrimental to the continued effectiveness of the officers involved. There are roughly 1,000,000 police officers in the United States out of an estimated 312,000,000 United States citizens. Even with the officer to citizen ratio varying from community to community, it appears obvious that informants are an absolute necessity in order for the police to protect society. There are simply not enough officers available to deter and detect criminal activity or to locate and apprehend criminals without assistance from citizens, particularly those associated with illegal activity. This need for extra “eyes and ears” has created a truly unique class of police assistant - the criminal informant. Basis for Liability In the recent past, pressure to obtain informants on the federal level began in the training academies and remained constant throughout the careers of the agents. -
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY Abadinsky, Howard. 1990. Organized Crime , 3rd ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall. Adorno, Theodor. 1941. On Popular Music. Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences 9: 17–8. Amis, Kingsley. 1965. The James Bond Dossier . London: Cape. Anderson, Richard L. 1990a. Popular Art and Aesthetic Theory: Why the Muse Is Unembarrassed. Journal of Aesthetic Education 24: 33–46. Anderson, Richard L. 1990b. Calliope’s Sisters: A Comparative Study of Philosophies of Art . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Arendt, Hannah. 1971. Society and Culture. In Rosenberg, Bernard, and David Manning White, eds. Mass Culture Revisited . New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 93–101. Armstrong, Nancy. 1987. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel . Oxford: Oxford UP. Ashley, Mike. 2002. The Mammoth Encyclopedia of Modern Crime Fiction . New York: Carroll & Graf. Associated Press. 2001. Book Sales Edge up in US Market. Edmonton Journal 3 June: C6. Associated Press. 2001. Stephen King’s E-Novella Not Enough to Keep Mighty Words Solvent. Edmonton Journal 14 December: E1. Athanasourelis, John Paul. 2012. Raymond Chandler’s Philip Marlowe: The Hard- Boiled Detective Transformed . Jefferson, NC: MacFarland and Co. Aubry, Timothy. 2011. Reading as Therapy: What Contemporary Fiction Does for Middle-Class Americans . Iowa City: University of Iowa Press. Auden, W.H. 1948. The Guilty Vicarage. Harper’s Magazine May: 406–12. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 185 P. Swirski, American Crime Fiction, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30108-2 186 BIBLIOGRAPHY Australasian Council of Women and Policing Inc. 2002. 2002 Women and Policing Globally. http://www.aic.gov.au/events/aic%20upcoming%20events/2002/ policewomen3.htm . -
9981444779554 Sycamore
99981444779554981444779554 SycamoreSycamore RowRow (859h).indd(859h).indd i 119/09/20139/09/2013 11:05:2111:05:21 99981444779554981444779554 SycamoreSycamore RowRow (859h).indd(859h).indd iiii 119/09/20139/09/2013 111:05:211:05:21 Also by John Grisham A Time to Kill The Firm The Pelican Brief The Client The Chamber The Rainmaker The Runaway Jury The Partner The Street Lawyer The Testament The Brethren A Painted House Skipping Christmas The Summons The King of Torts Bleachers The Last Juror The Broker Playing for Pizza The Appeal The Associate Ford County The Confession The Litigators Calico Joe The Racketeer Theodore Boone Theodore Boone: The Abduction Theodore Boone: The Accused Theodore Boone: The Activist Non-fi ction The Innocent Man 99981444779554981444779554 SycamoreSycamore RowRow (859h).indd(859h).indd iiiiii 119/09/20139/09/2013 11:05:2111:05:21 99981444779554981444779554 SycamoreSycamore RowRow (859h).indd(859h).indd iviv 119/09/20139/09/2013 111:05:211:05:21 99981444779554981444779554 SycamoreSycamore RowRow (859h).indd(859h).indd v 119/09/20139/09/2013 11:05:2111:05:21 For sale only in India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka and Pakistan. First published in Great Britain in 2013 by Hodder & Stoughton An Hachette UK company 1 Copyright © Belfry Holdings, Inc., 2013 The right of John Grisham to be identifi ed as the Author of the Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the publisher, nor be otherwise circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.