DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Friday Volume 493 12 June 2009 No. 90 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 12 June 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; Tel: 0044 (0) 208876344; e-mail: [email protected] 1033 12 JUNE 2009 1034 House of Commons Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions Bill Friday 12 June 2009 Consideration of Bill, not amended in the Public Bill Committee. Third Reading The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Queen’s and Prince of Wales’s consent signified. PRAYERS 9.50 am The First Deputy Chairman of Ways and Means took the Chair as Deputy Speaker (Standing Order No. 3). Malcolm Wicks (Croydon, North) (Lab): I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time. Mr. Andrew Dismore (Hendon) (Lab): I beg to move, As I trooped through the No Lobby, I reflected that, That the House sit in private. given the fervour for the modernisation of Parliament, I Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 163). hope that the modernisers will look critically at the way in which we spend our Friday mornings. The shenanigans The House proceeded to a Division. that go on are not fit for purpose in a serious parliamentary democracy. Madam Deputy Speaker (Sylvia Heal): I ask the Serjeant at Arms to investigate the delay in the No lobby. It is my pleasure to present the Bill for its Third Reading. I thank hon. Members for their useful The House having divided: Ayes 0, Noes 32. contributions on Second Reading on 24 April. I am Division No. 147] [9.33 am grateful for all their comments and questions, and encouraged by the unanimous cross-party support for AYES the measure. We had an equally useful, albeit short, Tellers for the Ayes: John Austin exchange in Committee, and I am impressed with the Mr. Andrew Dismore and commitment that hon. Members continue to show to the cause of mutuality and co-operation. NOES The Bill represents something of a rebranding of societies. It provides for all new societies registered Allen, Mr. Graham Lansley, Mr. Andrew Bellingham, Mr. Henry Lewis, Mr. Ivan under the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965 Bottomley, Peter Mackay, rh Mr. Andrew to be registered as co-operative or community benefit Brown, Lyn McCarthy-Fry, Sarah societies and it sets out the basis on which societies may Burt, Alistair Prentice, Bridget be registered. The criteria are essentially those in existing Chope, Mr. Christopher Rammell, Bill legislation and no major change is made to the qualifying Davies, Philip Ruddock, Joan criteria. Dunne, Mr. Philip Seabeck, Alison The introduction of the registration requirement will Fitzpatrick, Jim Skinner, Mr. Dennis also ensure that societies can be properly supervised by Goodman, Helen Smith, Angela E. (Basildon) the Financial Services Authority, thus improving corporate Heath, Mr. David Spellar, rh Mr. John governance over the sector. By modernising the name Sutcliffe, Mr. Gerry Heathcoat-Amory, rh from “industrial and provident society”—which, I admit, Mr. David Thornberry, Emily has a historical resonance and status—to terms which Hurd, Mr. Nick Timms, rh Mr. Stephen Jack, rh Mr. Michael Wicks, rh Malcolm are, in any case, in common usage, we can help the sector adopt a modern 21st century status and persona. Jenkin, Mr. Bernard Tellers for the Noes: Keen, Ann Helen Jones and Societies that are already registered do not have to Lammy, rh Mr. David Mark Tami register again. If my Bill becomes an Act, societies that register before it is implemented will not be affected by The Deputy Speaker declared that the Question was the definitions of “co-operative society” or “community not decided because fewer than 40 Members had participated benefit society” in the measure. in the Division (Standing Order No. 41). The Bill also deals with circumstances in which a society’s registration may be cancelled so that it reflects the new registration provisions. The FSA, as registrar, will be able to cancel a society’s registration when it does not meet the new statutory definitions. Again, the Bill caters for the status of societies registered, or treated as registered, under the current section 1 of the 1965 Act. The Bill changes the name of the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965 and that of other Acts concerning such societies so that “industrial and provident societies” is replaced by “co-operative societies” in the titles. That is part of the rebranding of industrial and provident societies. Peter Bottomley (Worthing, West) (Con): On modernisation, perhaps the right hon. Gentleman will consider, given that “industrial” has gone out of vogue, 1035 Co-operative and Community Benefit 12 JUNE 2009 Co-operative and Community Benefit 1036 Societies and Credit Unions Bill Societies and Credit Unions Bill [Peter Bottomley] walked along Victoria street this morning, but I think I have got the name right this Friday. The Bill gives whether that also applies to “Labour”, and whether the powers to the First Secretary of State to investigate party should be branded “the Co-operative party” again. companies and their affairs, and to requisition documents. Will he remind the House that the registration of credit Under the law as it stands, the FSA has certain unions is unchanged, although some provisions affect powers to investigate industrial and provident societies. them? Will he reflect on whether it is right to provide for However, such powers are limited, particularly in respect “the Treasury”to have power to do things when, normally of those societies that are not regulated by the FSA as in Bills, power is given to “the Secretary of State”, providing financial or insurance services. In contrast, which allows for greater flexibility in Government in the Secretary of State has more extensive powers to later years? investigate companies. That partly tackles the issue that the hon. Member for Worthing, West (Peter Bottomley) Malcolm Wicks: I will deal shortly with one or two of raised about the Secretary of State’s powers. The Bill those issues, not least credit unions, which both the will enable the Treasury to give the FSA powers of hon. Gentleman and I regard as particularly important investigation of industrial and provident societies, equivalent in the current economic climate in some of our poorer to the powers that the Secretary of State has in respect communities. On his useful—as ever—advice about the of companies. name of the Labour party, as every schoolboy and schoolgirl knows, there is a separate Co-operative party, The Bill also includes important provisions for credit of which I and many other Members are members. unions. It enables provisions that correspond to building Indeed, some colleagues are returned as Labour and society law to be made for credit unions. The power will Co-operative Members. However, it is always useful to allow any provision in building society legislation, which have a tutorial from the hon. Gentleman about the is deemed appropriate, to be mirrored for credit unions. history of the Labour movement, although it is not the Credit union membership has expanded significantly in subject of the Bill. recent times; indeed, perhaps I should declare that I have recently joined the excellent Croydon credit union. The Bill applies the Company Directors Disqualification The best way of allowing credit union law to keep pace Act 1986 to officers of industrial and provident societies, with that expansion in membership and operations is to as it applies to officers of companies, building societies bring it into line with building society law, which is and friendly societies. The 1986 Act provides for the tailored to deal with issues specific to institutions that disqualification of officers of companies and various accept deposits. The power is widely drawn, so as to bodies when such officers have seriously mismanaged allow any provisions of building society legislation deemed those bodies. Disqualification means being prohibited appropriate to be mirrored for credit unions. from involvement in the management of a company or from acting as an insolvency practitioner for a period of There are restrictions, however, to ensure that specific time. Under the law as it currently stands, officers of provisions of existing credit union law cannot be modified. industrial and provident societies who have mismanaged Thus, provisions regarding registration, the use of the a society cannot be disqualified. Clause 3 will make name “credit union”, the general prohibition on deposit their disqualification possible. taking, amalgamations or transfers of engagements and conversion of status between credit union companies The Bill provides for greater investigation of societies. are safe. There is a requirement that the Treasury consult It gives the Treasury powers to apply to industrial and with the appropriate persons before using the power, provident societies specific provisions of company law which is a reflection of its potentially wide scope. Depending on investigating companies, company names, dissolution, on which provisions of building society law are converted and on restoration to the register, which the FSA keeps, into credit union law, the Treasury might need to of industrial and provident societies. “confer power to make orders, regulations and other subordinate The Bill also applies part 31 of the Companies Act legislation; create criminal offences; provide for the charging of 2006, which contains provisions to strike defunct companies fees (but not any charge in the nature of taxation).” off the register of companies, to societies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download the Red Book
    The For this agenda-setting collection, the leading civil society umbrella groups ACEVO and CAF worked with Lisa Nandy MP to showcase some of Red Book Labour’s key thinkers about the party’s future relationship with charities The and social enterprises. The accompanying ‘Blue Book’ and ‘Yellow Book’ feature similar essays from the Conservative and Liberal Democrat Parties. ‘This collection of essays shows the depth and vibrancy of thinking across the Labour movement on this important issue and makes a vital the Voluntary of Sector Red Book contribution to the debate in the run-up to the next election.’ Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, Leader of the Labour Party of the ‘I hope this collection will be a provocation to further dialogue with Labour and with all the major political parties. It demonstrates a willingness to listen … that our sector should be grateful for.’ Voluntary Sector Sir Stephen Bubb, Chief Executive, ACEVO ‘The contributions in this collection show that the Labour Party possesses exciting ideas and innovations designed to strengthen Britain’s charities, Civil Society and the Labour Party and many of the concepts explored will be of interest to whichever party (or parties) are successful at the next election.’ after the 2015 election Dr John Low CBE, Chief Executive, Charities Aid Foundation With a foreword by the Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP £20 ISBN 978-1-900685-70-2 9 781900 685702 acevo-red-book-cover-centred-spine-text.indd All Pages 05/09/2014 15:40:12 The Red Book of the Voluntary Sector Civil Society and the Labour Party after
    [Show full text]
  • CV Malcolm Wicks, Science and Innovation
    I/10, Abteilung für bilaterale Angelegenheiten Stand: Mai 2007 UNITED KINGDOM Minister for Science and Innovation Ministry for Science and Innovation Malcolm WICKS Married, three children Portfolio: · Science and engineering · 10 year investment framework for science and innovation · Office of Science and Innovation (OSI) · Research Councils · Knowledge Transfer and Innovation · Technology Strategy · Patent Office · National Weights and Measures Laboratory (NWML) · Chemicals · Bioscience · DTI's interest in skills · British National Space Centre (BNSC) · Waste Electronic and Waste Equipment (WEEE) · Coal Health claims · Export control · Steel · Supports the Secretary of State on energy in the House of Commons Biography: He was appointed Minister of State for Science and Innovation on 10 November 2006, having previously been Minister of State for Energy at the Department of Trade and Industry since May 2005. Before joining DTI, he was Minister of State for Pensions (June 2003 - May 2005) and Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Work (June 2001 - June 2003) at the Department for Work and Pensions and Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Lifelong Learning at the Department for Education and Employment (appointed July 1999). He was the Chairman of the Education Select Committee from 1998 until his appointment as a Minister. He has been Member of Parliament for Croydon North since 1992. He was educated at North West London Polytechnic and the London School of Economics. Between 1974 and 1977, he was a university lecturer and from 1968 to 1974 a social policy analyst at the Home Office. He was Director of the Family Policy Studies Centre before entering Parliament. He is the author of several books and reports on aspects of the welfare state.
    [Show full text]
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely
    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
    [Show full text]
  • The Passage of the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill
    Concepts of Representation and The Passage of The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill Dr Sarah Childs First Draft for Journal of Legislative Studies Middlesex University White Hart Lane London N17 8HR 07950-933371 [email protected] Abstract The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill was introduced to the Commons in October 2001, gaining Royal Assent in February 2002. The Bill followed the decrease in the numbers of women elected in the 2001 General Election. It permits political parties to introduce positive action in the selection of candidates. The Bill received cross party support and had an easy passage through both Houses of Parliament. This article examines the arguments employed by MPs and Peers in support of the legislation, informed by feminist concepts of representation. Arguments associated with the claim that women have a different political style received little support. There was greater discussion of arguments based on symbolic representation and substantive representation, although many MPs were reluctant to make the strong claim that women’s substantive representation is dependent upon women’s presence. However, the most widely supported argument in favour of the Bill was the justice argument, namely, that women are currently being denied equal opportunities in the parties’ selection processes. Introduction1 The 2001 General Election saw 118 (17.9%) women MPs returned to the House of Commons. This was the first time in over twenty years that the numbers of women MPs had decreased (Lovenduski 2001). Yet it was not unexpected. Unlike 1997 when the Labour Party had implemented all women shortlists (AWS), no political party adopted positive discrimination measures for 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Theresa May - the Prime Minister
    Contents Theresa May - The Prime Minister .......................................................................................................... 5 Nancy Astor - The first female Member of Parliament to take her seat ................................................ 6 Anne Jenkin - Co-founder Women 2 Win ............................................................................................... 7 Margaret Thatcher – Britain’s first woman Prime Minister .................................................................... 8 Penny Mordaunt – First woman Minister of State for the Armed Forces at the Ministry of Defence ... 9 Lucy Baldwin - Midwifery and safer birth campaigner ......................................................................... 10 Hazel Byford – Conservative Women’s Organisation Chairman 1990 - 1993....................................... 11 Emmeline Pankhurst – Leader of the British Suffragette Movement .................................................. 12 Andrea Leadsom – Leader of House of Commons ................................................................................ 13 Florence Horsbrugh - First woman to move the Address in reply to the King's Speech ...................... 14 Helen Whately – Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party ............................................................. 15 Gillian Shephard – Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers ............................................... 16 Dorothy Brant – Suffragette who brought women into Conservative Associations ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health the Vision and the Challenge
    THE ROCK CARLING FELLOWSHIP 1997 Public Health The vision and the challenge THE ROCK CARLING FELLOWSHIP 1997 PUBLIC HEALTH The vision and the challenge The pursuit of public health can have no finality... The problems of public health are changing rapidly with increasing medical knowledge and changes in social and economic conditions, the age distribution of the population and the outlook of the people. Sixth Annual Report of the Department of Health for Scotland 1934 Walter W Holland CBE, FRCP, FFPHM LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science London AND Susie Stewart DL, MA, HON MFPHM Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow Glasgow Published by The Nuffield Trust 59 New Cavendish Street, London WIM 7RD ISBN 1-902089-10-3 © Nuffield Trust 1998 Publications Committee Sir Derek Mitchell, KCB, cvo Professor John Ledingham, DM, FRCP John Wyn Owen, CB Designed by Benjamin Rowntree Reports Limited PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY BIDDLES & CO The Rock Carling Fellowship commemorates the late Sir Ernest Rock Carling for many years a governing Trustee and Chairman of the Medical Advisory Committee of the Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust. It was stipulated that each holder of the Fellowship will seek to review in a monograph the state of knowledge and activity in one of the fields in which Sir Ernest had been particularly interested, and which is within the purposes of the Trust. The arrangements provide that the monograph will be introduced by a public lecture given at a recognised Medical Teaching Centre in the United
    [Show full text]
  • What Happened
    A guide to Parliamentary Ombudsman report’s findings and recommendations The Report finds the Government guilty of causing the injustices and financial losses suffered. It must pay full compensation, plus damages, must apologise for its actions and must replace the Financial Assistance Scheme with a proper compensation arrangement. The recommendations of the report are as follows: 1. Pensions must be fully restored to all those whose scheme started wind-up since April 1997 2. All other scheme benefits must also be restored – including tax free lump sums, life cover, ill- health cover and survivor benefits 3. Consolatory payments (damages) should be offered, as a tangible recognition of the distress, outrage, inconvenience and uncertainty suffered 4. Government should apologise to scheme trustees for the effects of the maladministration on their ability to perform their duties 5. Government should conduct an urgent review to speed up scheme wind-ups 6. The Financial Assistance Scheme must be fundamentally changed or replaced, since it is causing further injustices 7. Pension language should be clarified and the industry should take care over the language it uses in future. Phrases such as ‘guaranteed’ and ‘fully funded’ should not be used if they will mislead members. 8. Any members who have suffered other losses – such as those who have been forced to sell their homes because they did not get the pensions they were relying on – should claim compensation from the DWP compensation scheme The cost implications Headline costs of these recommendations would be many billions of pounds. At least £5billion. However, pensions are paid over many years and if the pensions are paid out on an ongoing basis, rather than capitalising the sum immediately, the costs should average around £120million a year for 40 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 552 5 November 2012 No. 63 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 5 November 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 571 5 NOVEMBER 2012 572 compensation. Does my hon. Friend agree that the House of Commons position is unfair and should be reviewed by HMRC? Monday 5 November 2012 Steve Webb: I am grateful to my hon. Friend for raising that case. I have corresponded with Treasury The House met at half-past Two o’clock colleagues about the issue, and, subject to their consent, I shall be happy to share with him the reply that I have PRAYERS just received. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Disability Strategy 2. Stuart Andrew (Pudsey) (Con): What progress he Oral Answers to Questions has made on the Government’s disability strategy. [126299] WORK AND PENSIONS The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Esther McVey): Fulfilling Potential, our The Secretary of State was asked— disability strategy, is being co-produced with disabled people. We published “Fulfilling Potential—The Discussions UK Pension-holders So Far” and “Fulfilling Potential—Next Steps” on 17 September. Our key themes, which we intend to 1. Dan Jarvis (Barnsley Central) (Lab): What steps he make a real difference, are early intervention, choice is taking to ensure that foreign conglomerates carry out and control, and inclusive communities. their responsibilities to UK pension-holders. [126298] The Minister of State, Department for Work and Stuart Andrew: Can the Minister explain what the Pensions (Steve Webb): As this is the first session of role of the disabled people’s user-led organisations will DWP questions since the announcement of the untimely be in the strategy? death of Malcolm Wicks, I hope that you will allow me, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • OVERSEAS TRAVEL by MINISTERS 1 April 2007 – 31 March 2008
    OVERSEAS TRAVEL BY MINISTERS 1 April 2007 – 31 March 2008 CABINET OFFICE JULY 2008 OVERSEAS TRAVEL BY MINISTERS 2007 – 2008 INDEX Page Attorney General’s Office 1 Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform 2 Cabinet Office 7 Minister for the Olympics and London 8 Chief Whip (Commons) 9 Chief Whip (Lords) 10 Department for Children, Schools and Families 11 Department for Communities and Local Government 13 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 14 Ministry of Defence 16 Deputy Prime Minister’s Office 19 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 20 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 24 Department of Health 33 Home Office 34 Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills 37 Department for International Development 38 Ministry of Justice 42 Lord Privy Seal and Leader of the House of Commons 44 Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Lords 45 Northern Ireland Office 46 Prime Minister’s Office 47 Scotland Office 49 Department for Transport 50 HM Treasury 52 Wales Office 54 Department for Work and Pensions 55 OVERSEAS TRAVEL BY MINISTERS 2007 – 2008 ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFFICE Dates Minister Destination Purpose of Trip Scheduled, ‘No No. of Officials Total cost 32 (The Royal) Accompanying including travel Squadron’, or Minister, where & ‘Other RAF’ or non scheduled accommodation ‘Charter’ travel used Attorney General 18 - 19 April Rt Hon Lord Luxembourg Justice and Home Affairs Council Scheduled £676 2007 Goldsmith QC 25 May Rt Hon Lord Munich, Meetings with G8 Justice and Interior Ministers Other RAF
    [Show full text]
  • Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997
    Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997 Parliamentary Information List Standard Note: SN/PC/04657 Last updated: 11 March 2008 Author: Department of Information Services All efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this data. Nevertheless the complexity of Ministerial appointments, changes in the machinery of government and the very large number of Ministerial changes between 1979 and 1997 mean that there may be some omissions from this list. Where an individual was a Minister at the time of the May 1997 general election the end of his/her term of office has been given as 2 May. Finally, where possible the exact dates of service have been given although when this information was unavailable only the month is given. The Parliamentary Information List series covers various topics relating to Parliament; they include Bills, Committees, Constitution, Debates, Divisions, The House of Commons, Parliament and procedure. Also available: Research papers – impartial briefings on major bills and other topics of public and parliamentary concern, available as printed documents and on the Intranet and Internet. Standard notes – a selection of less formal briefings, often produced in response to frequently asked questions, are accessible via the Internet. Guides to Parliament – The House of Commons Information Office answers enquiries on the work, history and membership of the House of Commons. It also produces a range of publications about the House which are available for free in hard copy on request Education web site – a web site for children and schools with information and activities about Parliament. Any comments or corrections to the lists would be gratefully received and should be sent to: Parliamentary Information Lists Editor, Parliament & Constitution Centre, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2017-2018 Issue
    We are delighted to turn more applications from under- represented students into offers. Minouche Shafik, new Director of LSE, on the School’s successes in Widening Participation p4 Issue 17, Winter 2017/18 Celebrating volunteering and philanthropy at LSE FOCUS ON HIGHLIGHTS: Arena: combating WIDENING disinformation in the Expanding horizons: information age p14 PARTICIPATION: Annual Fund Study LSE leads the way in Abroad travel LSE Supporter Roll social mobility p4 bursaries p10 2016/17 p23 LSE and Sutton Trust Sustainable economic partner in providing growth through evidence- Pathways p6 based research: the IGC in India p12 1 Contents REALISING POTENTIAL: FOCUS ON WIDENING PARTICIPATION LSE leads the way in social mobility p4 Alison Wetherfield Foundation supports lawyers of the future p5 LSE and Sutton Trust partner in providing Pathways p6 Hammering out a new world – the Fabian Window at LSE p7 Scholarship news p7 VOLUNTEERING Alumni news p8 My LSE story: Manuel Geggus, vice-president of the German Friends of LSE p9 ANNUAL FUND Expanding horizons: Annual Fund Study Abroad travel bursaries p10 Annual Fund breaks £1 million barrier again p11 Cover story: LSE leads the way in social mobility p4 RESEARCH INNOVATION Sustainable economic growth through evidence-based research and policy p12 IGC in India p13 Arena: combating disinformation in the information age p14 THOUGHT LEADERSHIP My LSE story: Manuel Geggus (second from right), Kuwait Programme celebrates vice-president of the 10th anniversary with five-year German Friends of LSE p9
    [Show full text]