Documents Disclosed by the Crown Prosecution Service
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review
The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review Third Edition Editor John P Janka Law Business Research The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review THIRD EDITION Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in TheT echnology, Media and Telecommunications Review, 3rd edition (published in October 2012 – editor John P Janka). For further information please email [email protected] 2 The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review THIRD EDITION Editor John P Janka Law Business Research Ltd The Law Reviews THE MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS REVIEW THE RESTRUCTURING REVIEW THE PRIVATE COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION REVIEW THE EMPLOYMENT LAW REVIEW THE PUBLIC COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE BANKING REGULATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION REVIEW THE MERGER CONTROL REVIEW THE TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVIEW THE INWARD INVESTMENT AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION REVIEW THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REVIEW THE CORPORATE IMMIGRATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW THE PROJECTS AND CONSTRUCTION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MARKETS REVIEW THE REAL ESTATE LAW REVIEW THE PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW THE ENERGY REGULATION AND MARKETS REVIEW THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW THE ASSET MANAGEMENT REVIEW THE PRIVATE WEALTH AND PRIVATE CLIENT REVIEW www.TheLawReviews.co.uk PUBLISHER Gideon Roberton BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Adam Sargent MARKETING MANAGERS Nick Barette, Katherine Jablonowska, Alexandra Wan PUBLISHING ASSISTANT Lucy Brewer EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Lydia Gerges PRODUCTION MANAGER Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Joanne Morley SUBEDITOR Caroline Rawson EDITor-in-CHIEF Callum Campbell MANAGING DIRECTOR Richard Davey Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2012 Law Business Research Ltd © Copyright in individual chapters vests with the contributors No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. -
Hacking Affair Is Not Over – but What Would a Second Leveson Inquiry Achieve?
7/10/2019 Hacking affair is not over – but what would a second Leveson inquiry achieve? Academic rigour, journalistic flair Hacking affair is not over – but what would a second Leveson inquiry achieve? July 25, 2014 3.57pm BST Author John Jewell Director of Undergraduate Studies, School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, Cardiff University On we go. Ian Nicholson/PA In the latest episode in the long-running saga that is the phone hacking affair, Dan Evans, a former journalist at the News of the World and Sunday Mirror, has received a 10 month suspended sentence after being convicted of two counts of phone hacking, one of making illegal payments to officials, and one of perverting the course of justice. Coming so soon after the conviction of Andy Coulson and the acquittal of Rebekah Brooks and others, one could be forgiven for assuming that the whole phone hacking business is now done and dusted. Not a bit of it. As Julian Petley has written: “Eleven more trials are due to take place involving 20 current or former Sun and News of the World journalists, who are accused variously of making illegal payments to public officials, conspiring to intercept voicemail and accessing data on stolen mobile phones.” We also learned in June that Scotland Yard had officially told Rupert Murdoch of their intention to interview him as part of their inquiry into allegations of crime at his British newspapers. The Guardian revealed that Murdoch was first contacted in 2013, but the police ceded to his lawyers’ request that any interrogation should wait until the Coulson–Brooks trial had finished. -
Actual Malice" Standard Really Necessary? a Comparative Perspective Russell L
Louisiana Law Review Volume 53 | Number 4 March 1993 Is The ewN York Times "Actual Malice" Standard Really Necessary? A Comparative Perspective Russell L. Weaver Geoffrey Bennett Repository Citation Russell L. Weaver and Geoffrey Bennett, Is The New York Times "Actual Malice" Standard Really Necessary? A Comparative Perspective, 53 La. L. Rev. (1993) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol53/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Is The New York Times "Actual Malice" Standard Really Necessary? A Comparative Perspective Russell L. Weaver* Geoffrey Bennett** In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan,' the United States Supreme Court extended First Amendment guarantees to defamation actions.2 Many greeted the Court's decision with joy. Alexander Meiklejohn claimed that the decision was "an occasion for dancing in the streets. ' 3 He believed that the decision would have a major impact on defamation law, and he was right. After the decision, many years elapsed during which "there were virtually no recoveries by public officials in libel 4 actions." The most important component of the New York Times decision was its "actual malice" standard. This standard provided that, in order to recover against a media defendant, a public official must demonstrate that the defendant acted with "malice.' In other words, the official must show that the defendant knew that the defamatory statement was © Copyright 1993, by LoUIsIANA LAW REVIEW. -
New Hybrid Connectivity Based Approaches
Appendix C: Hamiltonian Paths with Double Pheromone Ant Colony System Optimisation This appendix contains the full list of topics of the hamiltonian path identified by the algorithm presented on the PhD thesis of David M.S. Rodrigues Reading the news through their structure: new hybrid connectivity based approaches. This appendix is available in digital format at http://www.davidrodrigues.org/pdfs/phd/ and on the accompanying CD delivered with the printed copy of the thesis. As news follow a hamiltonian path the first news in the following list is connected to the last news of the list to complete the path. • Eurozone debt crisis live: Italian senate passes austerity law | Business | guardian.co.uk • Greek leaders agree to unity government as future hangs in balance | World news | guardian.co.uk • Lucas Papademos to lead Greece’s interim coalition government | World news | guardian.co.uk • The euro will survive – and Britain will join, says Michael Heseltine | World news | guardian.co.uk • Eurozone bailout fund falls short of e1 trillion target | Business | The Guardian • Euro debt crisis: Greek PM George Papandreou to resign | World news | guardian.co.uk • Chaos in Greece amid battle to form a ’government of national salvation’ | World news | The Observer • Eurozone debt crisis: EU members line up to demand ECB intervention | Business | The Guardian 1 • Italy passes austerity measures – clearing way for Berlusconi to quit | Business | guardian.co.uk • European debt crisis live: pressure mounts as finance ministers meet | Business | guardian.co.uk -
British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate : Journalists Reporting Journalism
This is a repository copy of British media coverage of the press reform debate : journalists reporting journalism. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/165721/ Version: Published Version Book: Ogbebor, B. orcid.org/0000-0001-5117-9547 (2020) British media coverage of the press reform debate : journalists reporting journalism. Springer Nature , (227pp). ISBN 9783030372651 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Journalists Reporting Journalism Binakuromo Ogbebor British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Binakuromo Ogbebor British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Journalists Reporting Journalism Binakuromo Ogbebor Journalism Studies The University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK ISBN 978-3-030-37264-4 ISBN 978-3-030-37265-1 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37265-1 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. -
Privacy, Probity and Public Interest Whittle and Cooper Cover Image © Reuters © Image Cover , –7 the Independent
Whittle and Cooper cover C:Layout 1 01/07/2009 15:43 Page 1 RISJ REUTERS REUTERS CHALLENGES INSTITUTE for the STUDY of INSTITUTE for the JOURNALISM CHALLENGES STUDY of JOURNALISM | Privacy, probity and public interest probity Privacy, “'Privacy, Probity and Public Interest' shows how privacy has come Privacy, probity and to be both better protected by the courts and more widely ignored: big questions, riveting examples and sharp analysis.” Baroness Onora O'Neill, President of the British Academy and public interest Professor of Philosophy, Cambridge University “is report is from the frontline. Although it contains an admirable survey of the law and the stance of the regulators, it does much more. It gives interested parties a voice. e authors provide their own thoughtful commentary; they do not shirk the difficult questions. Stephen Whittle and Glenda Cooper Everyone should be interested in this debate, and I wholeheartedly commend this report to anyone who is.” Andrew Caldecott, QC, Specialist in Media Law “An erudite and compelling exposition of one of the most important ethical dilemmas facing British Journalism in the internet era. e authors identify a route towards a new journalism that can respect privacy without compromising its democratic obligation to hold power to account.” Tim Luckhurst Professor of Journalism, University of Kent Stephen Whittle is a journalist and was the BBC's Controller of Editorial Policy (2001–2006). As Controller, he was involved in some of the most high profile BBC investigations such as The Secret Policeman, Licence To Kill, and Panoramas on the Olympics and care of the elderly. -
“The British Press Requires Tougher Regulation” the Regulation of the Media Debate in Context 2 of 6 NOTES
MOTION: JANUARY 2013 REGULATION “THE BRITISH PRESS OF THE MEDIA REQUIRES TOUGHER ED NOEL & ABIGAIL ROSS-JACKSON REGULATION” DEBATING MATTERS DEBATING MATTERS TOPIC GUIDES PRIMARY FUNDER HEADLINE SPONSOR TOPIC GUIDE SPONSORS GUIDEwww.debatingmatters.comS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 of 6 NOTES Initially prompted by the News of the World Hacking Scandal, Introduction 1 the culmination of Lord Leveson’s Inquiry into the Culture, Key terms 1 Practices and Ethics of the Press was a report which advocated an independent regulator of the press with statutory underpinning The regulation of the media debate in context 2 [Ref: Guardian]. Despite the seemingly voluntary status of Essential reading 4 becoming a member of this regulatory body, and the current vagaries as to whether Leveson’s proposals will become policy, Backgrounders 5 the principled question remains whether the press should be subject to any kind of independent regulation at all, with or Organisations 5 without statutory underpinning. Whilst some commentators In the news 6 say any state regulation of the press fundamentally undermines the right to free speech, lobbying groups such as Hacked Off [Ref: Hacked Off] continue to argue that mildly regulating the practices of journalists and the content they produce is not an unreasonable demand [Ref: New Statesman]. So does ‘Hackgate’ reveal there is something rotten at the heart of the media? KEY TERMS Should a new licensing watchdog keep the ‘beast’ in check? Or Fourth Estate are we in danger, as journalist Nick Cohen argues, of throwing -
Why Is James Murdoch So Angry? - Background Briefing - ABC Radio N
Why is James Murdoch so angry? - Background Briefing - ABC Radio N... http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/why-... WHY IS JAMES MURDOCH SO ANGRY? Download audioshow transcript Broadcast:Sunday 31 October 2010 9:00AM The stars have not been in alignment for the Murdoch empire: a phone hacking scandal threatens its influence in British politics, people won't pay for online content, the pirates have the best digital maps, and the British Library wants to give information away for free. Reporter Stan Correy Image: James Murdoch arriving for work in east London, November 23, 2011. (AFP: Warren Allott) View comments (18) FacebookTwi tter DeliciousRedditDiggEmail what are these? Transcript Hide Centurion: Caesar!!! Caesar: Who will fight with me? Who will fight with me? Will you fight for me? MUSIC Stan Correy: They're some lines from the film Battle of Alesia, where Julius Caesar is savaging the Gauls in a fight over what is now called France. Interestingly, early this year Rupert Murdoch invested over $30-million into his Project Alesia, to get control of a different kind of territory: Cyberspace. But unlike Caesar, Murdoch didn't win his Battle of Alesia. This week, Project Alesia was quietly shelved, but neither Rupert nor his son James have given up. They're still fighting on many fronts - business, politics and legal. And James in particular is angry. Very angry. Centurion: Yar! ! Stan Correy: Hello, I'm Stan Correy and this is Background Briefing on ABC Radio National. One of the problems for News Corp is that there are perhaps too many battles right now. -
BOXER, ROCKEFELLER CALL for ANSWERS from DOW JONES EDITORIAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Senators Seek Assurance No News Corp
Senator John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV, Chairman For Immediate Release http://commerce.senate.gov Contact: Jena Longo July 20, 2011 202-224-8374 BOXER, ROCKEFELLER CALL FOR ANSWERS FROM DOW JONES EDITORIAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Senators Seek Assurance No News Corp. Executives in U.S. Were Complicit in Wrongdoing and That No Misconduct Occurred in U.S. WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), Chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, called on the members of the Dow Jones and Company Special Committee to ensure that no News Corporation senior executives at United States properties were aware of or complicit in any wrongdoing in the burgeoning hacking scandal and that no misconduct occurred in our country. In particular, Senators Boxer and Rockefeller requested information relating to the hiring of Leslie Hinton, who retired just days ago as Dow Jones chief executive officer and publisher of the Wall Street Journal. Prior to his tenure at Dow Jones and the Journal, Hinton was chairman of News International and admitted in testimony before Parliament that he had knowledge of and authorized payments in 2007 to a private investigator and a reporter after they were convicted of illegal phone hacking. The Special Committee was formed during News Corporation’s 2007 purchase of Dow Jones and Company to ensure the “continued journalistic and editorial integrity and independence of Dow Jones’ publications and services.” The Committee’s unique position affords “access to all books, records, -
Did the PCC Fail When It Came to Phone Hacking?
Did the PCC fail when it came to phone hacking? Martin Moore December 2011 Did the PCC fail when it came to phone hacking? An analysis of the actions of the PCC towards phone hacking and other related forms of illegal and unethical privacy intrusion from 2003-2009. Cover image by AMagill on Flickr (Creative Commons) Introduction For many within the press the Leveson Inquiry is unfortunate and unnecessary. It is a political distraction partly designed to divert attention from the Conservatives‟ links with News International. At best it is an unpleasant airing of the press‟ dirty laundry that has to be endured. At worst it is a dangerous threat to press freedom. These Leveson critics acknowledge there is a problem with press self- regulation, though they believe it has little to do with the functioning of the existing system. The chief problem, they suggest, is that certain people are able to choose whether they stay or go. For this reason their efforts at reform to date have been focused on how to draw everyone together within the self-regulatory fold. Most notably how to draw in the one rogue proprietor who controls about 15% of national newspaper circulation, Richard Desmond. Their focus is not on how to root out industry malpractice or to create a new system that prevents and uncovers such malpractice. This is because they do not believe the old system really failed in this respect. They do not believe self- regulation was to blame for not investigating and not exposing phone hacking or other widespread forms of illegal and unethical privacy intrusion. -
UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT of ORAL EVIDENCE to Be Published As HC 903-Vi
UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 903-vi HOUSE OF COMMONS ORAL EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT COMMITTEE PHONE HACKING THURSDAY 10 NOVEMBER 2011 JAMES MURDOCH Evidence heard in Public Questions 1460 - 1719 USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is an uncorrected transcript of evidence taken in public and reported to the House. The transcript has been placed on the internet on the authority of the Committee, and copies have been made available by the Vote Office for the use of Members and others. 2. Any public use of, or reference to, the contents should make clear that neither witnesses nor Members have had the opportunity to correct the record. The transcript is not yet an approved formal record of these proceedings. 3. Members who receive this for the purpose of correcting questions addressed by them to witnesses are asked to send corrections to the Committee Assistant. 4. Prospective witnesses may receive this in preparation for any written or oral evidence they may in due course give to the Committee. 1 Oral Evidence Taken before the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on Thursday 10 November 2011 Members present: Mr John Whittingdale (Chair) Dr Thérèse Coffey Damian Collins Philip Davies Paul Farrelly Louise Mensch Steve Rotheram Mr Adrian Sanders Jim Sheridan Mr Tom Watson Examination of Witness Witness: James Murdoch, Deputy Chief Operating Officer and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (International), News Corporation. Q1460 Chair: Good morning. This is a further special session of the Culture, Media and Sport Committee’s inquiry. We are examining the previous evidence given to us when we were investigating phone hacking and whether or not the Committee was misled at that time. -
Self–Regulation of the Press
House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee Self–regulation of the press Seventh Report of Session 2006–07 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 3 July 2007 HC 375 Published on 11 July 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 The Culture, Media and Sport Committee The Culture, Media and Sport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr John Whittingdale MP (Conservative, Maldon and East Chelmsford) [Chairman] Janet Anderson MP (Labour, Rossendale and Darwen) Mr Philip Davies MP (Conservative, Shipley) Mr Nigel Evans MP (Conservative, Ribble Valley) Paul Farrelly MP (Labour, Newcastle-under-Lyme) Mr Mike Hall MP (Labour, Weaver Vale) Alan Keen MP (Labour, Feltham and Heston) Rosemary McKenna MP (Labour, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Adam Price MP (Plaid Cymru, Carmarthen East and Dinefwr) Mr Adrian Sanders MP (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Helen Southworth MP (Labour, Warrington South) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/culture__media_and_sport.