DOCSLIB.ORG

BOXER, ROCKEFELLER CALL for ANSWERS from DOW JONES EDITORIAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Senators Seek Assurance No News Corp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BOXER, ROCKEFELLER CALL for ANSWERS from DOW JONES EDITORIAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Senators Seek Assurance No News Corp Senator John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV, Chairman For Immediate Release http://commerce.senate.gov Contact: Jena Longo July 20, 2011 202-224-8374 BOXER, ROCKEFELLER CALL FOR ANSWERS FROM DOW JONES EDITORIAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Senators Seek Assurance No News Corp. Executives in U.S. Were Complicit in Wrongdoing and That No Misconduct Occurred in U.S. WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), Chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, called on the members of the Dow Jones and Company Special Committee to ensure that no News Corporation senior executives at United States properties were aware of or complicit in any wrongdoing in the burgeoning hacking scandal and that no misconduct occurred in our country. In particular, Senators Boxer and Rockefeller requested information relating to the hiring of Leslie Hinton, who retired just days ago as Dow Jones chief executive officer and publisher of the Wall Street Journal. Prior to his tenure at Dow Jones and the Journal, Hinton was chairman of News International and admitted in testimony before Parliament that he had knowledge of and authorized payments in 2007 to a private investigator and a reporter after they were convicted of illegal phone hacking. The Special Committee was formed during News Corporation’s 2007 purchase of Dow Jones and Company to ensure the “continued journalistic and editorial integrity and independence of Dow Jones’ publications and services.” The Committee’s unique position affords “access to all books, records, facilities, and personnel of the Company.” In their letter to the Committee, Senators Boxer and Rockefeller wrote, “As you know, allegations of illegal phone hacking and bribery in the United Kingdom at properties owned by News Corporation, a United States-based company, have outraged people around the world…The American people need to be reassured that this kind of misconduct has not occurred in the United States and that senior executives at News Corporation properties in our country were not aware of or complicit in any wrongdoing.” The full text of the Senators’ letter is below: July 20, 2011 Members of the Special Committee Dow Jones and Company 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10281 Dear Members of the Special Committee: As you know, allegations of illegal phone hacking and bribery in the United Kingdom at properties owned by News Corporation, a United States-based company, have outraged people around the world. Ten individuals, including senior News Corporation executives, have been arrested and other top News Corporation officials have resigned. The American people need to be reassured that this kind of misconduct has not occurred in the United States and that senior executives at News Corporation properties in our country were not aware of or complicit in any wrongdoing. As members of the Special Committee in charge of overseeing the operation of the Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones and Company properties, your governing charter gives you a special responsibility to assure the “continued journalistic and editorial integrity and independence of Dow Jones’ publications and services.” The Special Committee, which was created as “a condition to the willingness of the Bancroft Investors to execute…the Merger Agreement” has unique authority since your charter provides “access [to]…all books, records, facilities, and personnel of the Company.” We were pleased to learn that the Special Committee will take steps to ensure that no illegal activity took place at Dow Jones and Company publications. But we were surprised that the Committee’s statement appears to foreclose any further investigation, despite the fact that the former chief executive officer of Dow Jones and former publisher of the Wall Street Journal served as the top official at News International while illegal phone hacking occurred at its newspapers. As you know, Leslie Hinton was hired as publisher of the Wall Street Journal and chief executive officer of News Corporation in December 2007. From 1995 through 2007, he served as Executive Chairman of News International, a foreign subsidiary of News Corporation that oversaw News of the World and other publications that are now under scrutiny. On July 20, 2011, the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee released a comprehensive report on the phone hacking scandal. The Committee noted that “it is almost impossible to escape the conclusion…that [News International] were deliberately trying to thwart a criminal investigation” during Mr. Hinton’s tenure as Executive Chairman. This condemnation of News International’s actions under Mr. Hinton’s leadership of the company is very troubling. In March 2007 Mr. Hinton appeared before the House of Commons of the United Kingdom to testify about phone hacking at News International’s News of the World paper that resulted in the imprisonment of one of its reporters, Clive Goodman, and a private investigator, Glenn Mulcaire. Mr. Hinton testified that the company had conducted a full investigation and determined that Mr. Goodman was the only employee involved in phone hacking. In 2009, Mr. Hinton again testified on the matter before Parliament and said that “there was never any evidence delivered to me that suggested that the conduct of Clive Goodman spread beyond him.” Mr. Hinton also admitted that he had authorized payments to both Mr. Goodman and Mr. Mulcaire after both had been sentenced for their role in illegal phone hacking. Evidence has recently been discovered that raises questions about Mr. Hinton’s 2007 and 2009 testimony. Despite Mr. Hinton’s assertions that the phone hacking was limited, British police now say that as many as 4,000 people have had their information illegally hacked by News of the World. Reported targets of phone hacking include a missing 13-year old girl, the families of British soldiers who died in Iraq and Afghanistan, the families of the victims of the 2005 London bombings, and former Prime Minister Gordon Brown and his family. In the United States, the Department of Justice has acknowledged that it has commenced an investigation to determine whether News of the World attempted to gain access to the phone records of victims of the attacks of September 11, 2001. On July 15, 2011, Mr. Hinton announced his resignation as publisher of the Wall Street Journal and chief executive officer of Dow Jones and Company, while insisting that he was “ignorant of what apparently happened” at News of the World. As the Chairman and a senior member of the Commerce Committee of the United States Senate, we urge the Special Committee to publicly address the following issues: 1) Will the Special Committee conduct a broader investigation that includes an examination of whether current or former senior Wall Street Journal or Dow Jones executives had knowledge of or a role in alleged criminal activity at News Corporation publications? 2) Did the Special Committee investigate Mr. Hinton’s knowledge of alleged criminal activity at News International before or after he was named publisher of the Wall Street Journal and CEO of Dow Jones? 3) Did any member of the Special Committee or other senior executives at the Wall Street Journal or Dow Jones express any concerns regarding the hiring of Mr. Hinton given his role in overseeing News International’s News of the World when its employees engaged in criminal phone hacking? This information will help give Americans confidence that the illegal activity that appears to have taken place at News Corporation in the United Kingdom did not spread to News Corporation entities in the United States. Sincerely, Barbara Boxer United States Senator John D. Rockefeller IV United States Senator ### .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review
    The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review Third Edition Editor John P Janka Law Business Research The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review THIRD EDITION Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in TheT echnology, Media and Telecommunications Review, 3rd edition (published in October 2012 – editor John P Janka). For further information please email [email protected] 2 The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review THIRD EDITION Editor John P Janka Law Business Research Ltd The Law Reviews THE MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS REVIEW THE RESTRUCTURING REVIEW THE PRIVATE COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION REVIEW THE EMPLOYMENT LAW REVIEW THE PUBLIC COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE BANKING REGULATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION REVIEW THE MERGER CONTROL REVIEW THE TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVIEW THE INWARD INVESTMENT AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION REVIEW THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REVIEW THE CORPORATE IMMIGRATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW THE PROJECTS AND CONSTRUCTION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MARKETS REVIEW THE REAL ESTATE LAW REVIEW THE PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW THE ENERGY REGULATION AND MARKETS REVIEW THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW THE ASSET MANAGEMENT REVIEW THE PRIVATE WEALTH AND PRIVATE CLIENT REVIEW www.TheLawReviews.co.uk PUBLISHER Gideon Roberton BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Adam Sargent MARKETING MANAGERS Nick Barette, Katherine Jablonowska, Alexandra Wan PUBLISHING ASSISTANT Lucy Brewer EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Lydia Gerges PRODUCTION MANAGER Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Joanne Morley SUBEDITOR Caroline Rawson EDITor-in-CHIEF Callum Campbell MANAGING DIRECTOR Richard Davey Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2012 Law Business Research Ltd © Copyright in individual chapters vests with the contributors No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Unauthorised Tapping Into Or Hacking of Mobile Communications
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications Thirteenth Report of Session 2010–12 1. This report is strictly embargoed and is not for broadcast or publication, in any form, before 05.00hrs, Wednesday 20 July 2011. 2. This report is issued under the condition that it should not be forwarded or copied to anyone else. 3. Under no circumstances should you distribute copies to anyone else or speak to the media before the publication time about the content of this report. 4. The report is subject to parliamentary copyright and you are not permitted to distribute, replicate, or publish further copies either in hard copy or on the internet either before or after publication. 5. If these instructions are unclear in any way please contact Alex Paterson on 020 7219 1589 or email [email protected] HC 907 Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications 3 House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications Thirteenth Report of Session 2010–12 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 July 2011 HC 907 Published on 20 July 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West
    [Show full text]
  • Zuckerberg Inks Video Calls Deal with Skype
    BUSINESS WITH PERSONALITY HAVE AN ALE ZUCKERBERG INKS VIDEO OF A TIME CALLS DEAL WITH SKYPE ARTISAN BEER COMES TO THE A FIRST FOR FACEBOOK PAGE 3 CITY PAGE 22 Issue 1,419 Thursday 7 July 2011 www.cityam.com FREE Chancellor NEWS CORP FEARS on hacking target list ▲ MEDIA DELAY TO SKY BID BY STEVE DINNEEN CHANCELLOR George Osborne yester- ▲ MEDIA ANALYSIS l British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC day joined the unenviable roll-call of BY STEVE DINNEEN p 827.00 people targeted by News of the World 850 6 Jul phone hackers. NEWS Corp bosses yesterday feared 845 Police visited Osborne last night to they may be forced to delay the firm’s 840 tell him that his personal details multi billion pound bid for BSkyB, as 835 appeared on notes kept by convicted the toxic political and commercial fall- 830 criminal Glenn Mulcaire and shamed out of the phone hacking scandal con- 825 former News of the World royal editor tinued to gather pace. 820 Clive Goodman. Bankers close to the deal told City It is not clear if Osborne’s name 30 Jun 1 Jul 4 Jul 5 Jul 6 Jul A.M. that negotiations have ground to and number were added to the list a halt while both sides consider the before or after he became chancellor. effects the ongoing scandal could have ANALYSIS l News Corp A spokesman for the Osborne said: on the proposed takeover. Even if the $ 17.94 “George was very grateful to the 6 Jul bid is waved through by the govern- 18.50 police.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2011 Bulletinprimary.Indd
    A PUBLICATION OF THE SILHA CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF MEDIA ETHICS AND LAW | SUMMER 2011 Not Just a ‘Rogue Reporter’: ‘Phone Hacking’ Scandal Spreads Far and Wide The so-called “phone hacking” scandal has led to more than Murdoch Closes News of the World and a dozen arrests, resignations by top News Corp. executives Speaks to Parliament while Public and British police, the launching of several new investigations Outrage Grows over Tabloid Crime, into News Corp. business practices, and pressured Murdoch to retreat from a business deal to purchase the remaining Collusion, and Corruption portion of BSkyB that he did not own. The U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) massive ethical and legal scandal enveloped the are reportedly conducting preliminary investigations into the Rupert Murdoch-owned British tabloid News of possibility of international law violations. The FBI is reportedly the World in the summer of 2011, leading to its investigating allegations that Murdoch journalists hacked into sudden closure. New allegations arose almost the phones of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks daily that reporters and private investigators or their families. British police have teamed up with Scottish Aillegally accessed the voice mail messages of politicians, authorities to continue investigating claims of phone hacking. celebrities, and private citizens. The revelations sparked Parliament launched a formal inquiry into the scandal and has worldwide public outcry and led to sweeping law enforcement questioned top News Corp. offi cials including Rupert Murdoch investigations directed at top editors of the paper, executives and his son, James Murdoch.
    [Show full text]
  • We Note You Have Failed to Provide Any New Evidence Sufficient to Support What Amount to Very Serious Allegations
    We note you have failed to provide any new evidence sufficient to support what amount to very serious allegations. This inevitably leads us to question the motives of the New York Times. It seems to us that your investigation has always been tainted by a vested interest in its outcome which means it is in serious and multiple breach of your own ethical guidelines. As you should know, [the hacking issue was] examined extensively by the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee over an eight-month period leading up to publication of its report “Press standards, privacy and libel” on 24 February this year. Every area addressed by your questions has already been the subject of detailed oral and/or written evidence and, in particular, put to, and answered by, our executives during public hearings conducted by the Committee. Your letter goes on to refer to unattributed conversations with “former reporters and editors” who make a number of unsubstantiated claims and then to a specific claim made by Matt Driscoll. He had a very difficult relationship with the newspaper, which included disciplinary action for inaccurate reporting . [His] termination was later challenged at an employment tribunal in an acrimonious case which we vigorously defended, but which Mr. Driscoll won. This should, I hope, make you exercise caution in your assessment of what Mr. Driscoll has told you. Failure to make your readers aware of why Mr. Driscoll’s comments may not be entirely objective would be a clear case of bias. For this reason, you should also exercise extreme caution in your approach to what you are told by any “former reporters and editors” and your readers should be made aware of any reasons why their views may be biased.
    [Show full text]
  • British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate : Journalists Reporting Journalism
    This is a repository copy of British media coverage of the press reform debate : journalists reporting journalism. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/165721/ Version: Published Version Book: Ogbebor, B. orcid.org/0000-0001-5117-9547 (2020) British media coverage of the press reform debate : journalists reporting journalism. Springer Nature , (227pp). ISBN 9783030372651 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Journalists Reporting Journalism Binakuromo Ogbebor British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Binakuromo Ogbebor British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Journalists Reporting Journalism Binakuromo Ogbebor Journalism Studies The University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK ISBN 978-3-030-37264-4 ISBN 978-3-030-37265-1 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37265-1 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sun's Settlement of Phone-Hacking Cases Means All Eyes Now on Leveson II
    2/1/2018 The Sun's settlement of phone-hacking cases means all eyes now on Leveson II Academic rigour, journalistic flair The Sun’s settlement of phone-hacking cases means all eyes now on Leveson II January 30, 2018 10.27am GMT Author John McLellan Honorary Professor of Journalism, University of Stirling Lord Justice Leveson with the report from the first part of his 2012 inquiry into press conduct. Gareth Fuller/PA Archive/PA Images The decision by News Group to close its phone-hacking compensation scheme in 2013 has proved to have been expensively premature – with nine more victims, including actor David Tennant and Olympic hurdler Colin Jackson, winning damages at the High Court recently. Despite that attempt to draw a line under the greatest scandal to hit British newspapers, the saga still has a distance to run – the law firm behind these cases, Collyer Bristow, apparently still has 50 more cases to go from the 200 phone-hacking clients it gained in the seven years since the News of the World folded. At the same time as the Collyer Bristow cases were being settled, four other celebrities, represented by a different firm, 5RB, including comedian Vic Reeves and TV presenter Kate Thornton, also concluded their cases without the need for a full hearing after News Group struck deals. All are believed to have accepted six-figure damages on top of costs estimated at around half a million pounds. These settlements are hardly helpful in the ongoing struggle by print media to bring the wider issue of press regulation reform to a conclusion – but nor do they add very much to the already detailed picture of a hacking and blagging operation of industrial proportions, other than the identities of the targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy, Probity and Public Interest Whittle and Cooper Cover Image © Reuters © Image Cover , –7 the Independent
    Whittle and Cooper cover C:Layout 1 01/07/2009 15:43 Page 1 RISJ REUTERS REUTERS CHALLENGES INSTITUTE for the STUDY of INSTITUTE for the JOURNALISM CHALLENGES STUDY of JOURNALISM | Privacy, probity and public interest probity Privacy, “'Privacy, Probity and Public Interest' shows how privacy has come Privacy, probity and to be both better protected by the courts and more widely ignored: big questions, riveting examples and sharp analysis.” Baroness Onora O'Neill, President of the British Academy and public interest Professor of Philosophy, Cambridge University “is report is from the frontline. Although it contains an admirable survey of the law and the stance of the regulators, it does much more. It gives interested parties a voice. e authors provide their own thoughtful commentary; they do not shirk the difficult questions. Stephen Whittle and Glenda Cooper Everyone should be interested in this debate, and I wholeheartedly commend this report to anyone who is.” Andrew Caldecott, QC, Specialist in Media Law “An erudite and compelling exposition of one of the most important ethical dilemmas facing British Journalism in the internet era. e authors identify a route towards a new journalism that can respect privacy without compromising its democratic obligation to hold power to account.” Tim Luckhurst Professor of Journalism, University of Kent Stephen Whittle is a journalist and was the BBC's Controller of Editorial Policy (2001–2006). As Controller, he was involved in some of the most high profile BBC investigations such as The Secret Policeman, Licence To Kill, and Panoramas on the Olympics and care of the elderly.
    [Show full text]
  • Pcc Report on Subterfuge and Newsgathering 1.0
    PCC REPORT ON SUBTERFUGE AND NEWSGATHERING 1.0 Introduction 1.1 The Press Complaints Commission has conducted an investigation into the use of subterfuge by the British newspaper and magazine industry, with particular reference to phone message tapping and compliance with the Editors’ Code of Practice and the Data Protection Act. 1.2 The inquiry followed the convictions in January 2007 of News of the World journalist Clive Goodman and inquiry agent Glenn Mulcaire for offences under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) and Criminal Law Act (1977). They had speculatively tapped into private mobile phone messages and used the information they discovered for stories in the News of the World. 1.3 This type of snooping has no place in journalism, and the Chairman of the Commission has publicly deplored it on a number of occasions. The Commission as a whole condemns such behaviour. 1.4 Despite the police inquiry, court case and convictions, the Commission considered that there were a number of outstanding questions that arose under the Code of Practice, which sets out the required professional standards for UK journalists and, as such, supplements the law. Last November, before the verdict was reached, the Chairman of the PCC had already put the then editor of the News of the World, Mr Andy Coulson, on notice that, depending on the outcome of the trial, the PCC might wish to pursue matters with him. 1.5 On January 26 2007, Mulcaire and Goodman were sentenced to 6 and 4 months in prison. Mr Coulson resigned his post, saying that he had “decided that the time has come for me to take ultimate responsibility for the events around the Clive Goodman case”.
    [Show full text]
  • “The British Press Requires Tougher Regulation” the Regulation of the Media Debate in Context 2 of 6 NOTES
    MOTION: JANUARY 2013 REGULATION “THE BRITISH PRESS OF THE MEDIA REQUIRES TOUGHER ED NOEL & ABIGAIL ROSS-JACKSON REGULATION” DEBATING MATTERS DEBATING MATTERS TOPIC GUIDES PRIMARY FUNDER HEADLINE SPONSOR TOPIC GUIDE SPONSORS GUIDEwww.debatingmatters.comS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 of 6 NOTES Initially prompted by the News of the World Hacking Scandal, Introduction 1 the culmination of Lord Leveson’s Inquiry into the Culture, Key terms 1 Practices and Ethics of the Press was a report which advocated an independent regulator of the press with statutory underpinning The regulation of the media debate in context 2 [Ref: Guardian]. Despite the seemingly voluntary status of Essential reading 4 becoming a member of this regulatory body, and the current vagaries as to whether Leveson’s proposals will become policy, Backgrounders 5 the principled question remains whether the press should be subject to any kind of independent regulation at all, with or Organisations 5 without statutory underpinning. Whilst some commentators In the news 6 say any state regulation of the press fundamentally undermines the right to free speech, lobbying groups such as Hacked Off [Ref: Hacked Off] continue to argue that mildly regulating the practices of journalists and the content they produce is not an unreasonable demand [Ref: New Statesman]. So does ‘Hackgate’ reveal there is something rotten at the heart of the media? KEY TERMS Should a new licensing watchdog keep the ‘beast’ in check? Or Fourth Estate are we in danger, as journalist Nick Cohen argues, of throwing
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is James Murdoch So Angry? - Background Briefing - ABC Radio N
    Why is James Murdoch so angry? - Background Briefing - ABC Radio N... http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/why-... WHY IS JAMES MURDOCH SO ANGRY? Download audioshow transcript Broadcast:Sunday 31 October 2010 9:00AM The stars have not been in alignment for the Murdoch empire: a phone hacking scandal threatens its influence in British politics, people won't pay for online content, the pirates have the best digital maps, and the British Library wants to give information away for free. Reporter Stan Correy Image: James Murdoch arriving for work in east London, November 23, 2011. (AFP: Warren Allott) View comments (18) FacebookTwi tter DeliciousRedditDiggEmail what are these? Transcript Hide Centurion: Caesar!!! Caesar: Who will fight with me? Who will fight with me? Will you fight for me? MUSIC Stan Correy: They're some lines from the film Battle of Alesia, where Julius Caesar is savaging the Gauls in a fight over what is now called France. Interestingly, early this year Rupert Murdoch invested over $30-million into his Project Alesia, to get control of a different kind of territory: Cyberspace. But unlike Caesar, Murdoch didn't win his Battle of Alesia. This week, Project Alesia was quietly shelved, but neither Rupert nor his son James have given up. They're still fighting on many fronts - business, politics and legal. And James in particular is angry. Very angry. Centurion: Yar! ! Stan Correy: Hello, I'm Stan Correy and this is Background Briefing on ABC Radio National. One of the problems for News Corp is that there are perhaps too many battles right now.
    [Show full text]
  • Did the PCC Fail When It Came to Phone Hacking?
    Did the PCC fail when it came to phone hacking? Martin Moore December 2011 Did the PCC fail when it came to phone hacking? An analysis of the actions of the PCC towards phone hacking and other related forms of illegal and unethical privacy intrusion from 2003-2009. Cover image by AMagill on Flickr (Creative Commons) Introduction For many within the press the Leveson Inquiry is unfortunate and unnecessary. It is a political distraction partly designed to divert attention from the Conservatives‟ links with News International. At best it is an unpleasant airing of the press‟ dirty laundry that has to be endured. At worst it is a dangerous threat to press freedom. These Leveson critics acknowledge there is a problem with press self- regulation, though they believe it has little to do with the functioning of the existing system. The chief problem, they suggest, is that certain people are able to choose whether they stay or go. For this reason their efforts at reform to date have been focused on how to draw everyone together within the self-regulatory fold. Most notably how to draw in the one rogue proprietor who controls about 15% of national newspaper circulation, Richard Desmond. Their focus is not on how to root out industry malpractice or to create a new system that prevents and uncovers such malpractice. This is because they do not believe the old system really failed in this respect. They do not believe self- regulation was to blame for not investigating and not exposing phone hacking or other widespread forms of illegal and unethical privacy intrusion.
    [Show full text]