DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Is James Murdoch So Angry? - Background Briefing - ABC Radio N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Is James Murdoch So Angry? - Background Briefing - ABC Radio N Why is James Murdoch so angry? - Background Briefing - ABC Radio N... http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/why-... WHY IS JAMES MURDOCH SO ANGRY? Download audioshow transcript Broadcast:Sunday 31 October 2010 9:00AM The stars have not been in alignment for the Murdoch empire: a phone hacking scandal threatens its influence in British politics, people won't pay for online content, the pirates have the best digital maps, and the British Library wants to give information away for free. Reporter Stan Correy Image: James Murdoch arriving for work in east London, November 23, 2011. (AFP: Warren Allott) View comments (18) FacebookTwi tter DeliciousRedditDiggEmail what are these? Transcript Hide Centurion: Caesar!!! Caesar: Who will fight with me? Who will fight with me? Will you fight for me? MUSIC Stan Correy: They're some lines from the film Battle of Alesia, where Julius Caesar is savaging the Gauls in a fight over what is now called France. Interestingly, early this year Rupert Murdoch invested over $30-million into his Project Alesia, to get control of a different kind of territory: Cyberspace. But unlike Caesar, Murdoch didn't win his Battle of Alesia. This week, Project Alesia was quietly shelved, but neither Rupert nor his son James have given up. They're still fighting on many fronts - business, politics and legal. And James in particular is angry. Very angry. Centurion: Yar! ! Stan Correy: Hello, I'm Stan Correy and this is Background Briefing on ABC Radio National. One of the problems for News Corp is that there are perhaps too many battles right now. One is about to begin in the British Parliament, there are several court cases, and the unpleasantness around the now infamous phone hacking scandals in the UK doesn't seem to be going away. And it's one reason Rupert Murdoch may not get his way and complete ownership of the digital giant BSkyB of which he already owns 40%. Man: SkyHD, see your HD-ready TV come to life. Sky, leave them better. Stan Correy: But back to that later. First, that phone hacking scandal. It erupted in 2005 when it was revealed a News Corp owned newspaper had been hacking into the phones of Princes William and Harry, and one of Rupert's rival newspapers The Guardian has been following the story closely. Nick Davies: A great many people in public life in Britain are very worried about the influence of Rupert Murdoch. People are worried about Murdoch's influence over more specific things to do with media regulation. We've just been told that the BBC licence fee won't be raised along with inflation, and people fear that that's Murdoch's influence, that he is trying to weaken the BBC so that 1 of 12 5/11/2012 9:56 AM Why is James Murdoch so angry? - Background Briefing - ABC Radio N... http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/why-... his own television outfit, Sky, can have a larger market share. And there are numerous examples, so people are very worried about Murdoch's influence. Stan Correy: In July last year, Guardian journalist Nick Davies exposed new evidence of more widespread hacking. Complicating the concerns about Murdoch's political influence is the allegation of how the phone hacking case was investigated. Nick Davies: It does appear that Members of Parliament who were trying to look at it felt that it wasn't in their interests to take on this powerful newspaper because they might find their private lives being exposed in an embarrassing way. Stan Correy: Investigative reporter with The Guardian newspaper in London, Nick Davies. There are many allegations like this, about the police, the politicians and the newspaper executives and journalists. Several deny it, but two major newspapers, The Guardian in England, and The New York Times, have continued to report it supported by revelations of new evidence. Both The Guardian and The New York Times are fierce competitors of News Corp. We will go into the phone hacking issues in more detail later. In the first instance, a journalist and a private investigator went to jail, but there was more to come. Murdoch's News of the World wasn't the only newspaper on Fleet Street involved in phone hacking. But it's deeply ironic that News Corporation newspapers were at the same time railing against the way the new technologies made it simple for people to 'steal' News Corp content. In the UK, phone hacking is about the theft of personal information, and in European privacy law, personal information is your intellectual property. Moderator: Welcome to the opening ceremony of the inaugural Abu Dhabi Media Summit. APPLAUSE Stan Correy: In March this year, Rupert Murdoch and his son James attended the Media Summit at Abu Dhabi, and Rupert gave the keynote address. James was on a panel of media executives discussing current trends in the media industry. The buzz was all about the new digital devices, marketing and distributing ideas, entertainment and news. James Murdoch: We have a bunch of people in the audience I think who are going to ask some questions, I hope ... Stan Correy: But everyone was asking: How do we get people to pay for all of this? How do we stop them illegally downloading content. There was a question for James Murdoch from an Australian lawyer in the audience, who says it's all too late, that the digital genie is out of the bottle. Tom Levine: My name's Tom Levine; I'm a lawyer here in Abu Dhabi and I'm afraid this is a real lawyer's question. But it comes out of the emphasis on copyright that's been made by quite a lot of people; both Murdoch chairmen made the same point about the protection of content, and there's clearly a great deal of concern about theft of content. But one of the first things I learnt a Law School is that a law that is neither respected nor enforced is not a law at all. And I wonder if there is a risk that that train has already left the station. Because young people don't care that it's illegal to store content. What is it that the media industry can do to increase the respect for not illegally downloading content, because I think that without law the law will be ineffective. Stan Correy: Tom Levine's point was there's no stopping the new world of digital media. Kids and content-makers are living in a new world where content bounces around like squash balls, and ownership is virtually impossible to control. But James Murdoch has no sympathy for this new world, or young people who don't care about illegal downloads. Punish them, he says. James Murdoch: You need governments to play ball. These are property rights. These are basic property rights. There is no difference from going into a store and stealing a packet of pringles or a handbag, and stealing something online. Right? And the idea that there is this new consumer class that somehow are thieves, but we call them consumers, and we say we have to be customer friendly when they're stealing stuff, is lunacy. Right? This is the basic condition for investment and economic growth, is some level of sanctity around property rights, whether it's my house or a movie I've made. OK? And there's no difference that I think it's crazy frankly, people say, Oh, it's different, these kids, you know, these crazy kids.' No, punish them. Stan Correy: James Murdoch at the Abu Dhabi Media Summit in March. News Corp doesn't only talk the talk when it comes to punishing digital piracy, it gets involved in litigation. In the past month, along with other movie studios, News Corp is involved in two legal suits against small online television companies claiming they're illegally streaming News Corp film and television product. And in the online news world, the News Corp company, Dow Jones, is suing a financial news service called Briefing.com Following this action is digital copyright expert from the ANU, Matthew Rimmer. Matthew Rimmer: It's too simplistic for Murdoch to say that News Corporation is merely the innocent victim of piracy by others. News and Murdoch open themselves up to the rejoinder that they themselves have infringed the copyright of others. Stan Correy: Rimmer makes the point that all media copy all the time from other media; it's the nature of the Medusa-headed beast. On the Background Briefing website, we've put up the court documents for Dow Jones and for Briefing.com. So if you're interested 2 of 12 5/11/2012 9:56 AM Why is James Murdoch so angry? - Background Briefing - ABC Radio N... http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/why-... in the finer points of digital copyright law, both documents are worth reading. But here's Matthew Rimmer with a basic summary. Matthew Rimmer: In the current battle between Dow Jones and Briefing.com, Dow Jones has alleged that Briefing.com has infringed its copyright; Briefing.com's rejoinder, amongst other things, is that Dow Jones itself has borrowed a wide range of information, financial and otherwise from Briefing.com, and suggested that this was a case of throwing stones in glass houses, in that Murdoch and News had unclean hands, as it were. So one of their arguments is that they shouldn't be able to bring such an action because they themselves are dependent upon a wide range of other people's copyright material which they use without permission.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Murdoch's Global Plan For
    CNYB 05-07-07 A 1 5/4/2007 7:00 PM Page 1 TOP STORIES Portrait of NYC’s boom time Wall Street upstart —Greg David cashes in on boom on the red hot economy in options trading Page 13 PAGE 2 ® New Yorkers are stepping to the beat of Dancing With the Stars VOL. XXIII, NO. 19 WWW.NEWYORKBUSINESS.COM MAY 7-13, 2007 PRICE: $3.00 PAGE 3 Times Sq. details its growth, worries Murdoch’s about the future PAGE 3 global plan Under pressure, law firms offer corporate clients for WSJ contingency fees PAGE 9 421-a property tax Times, CNBC and fight heads to others could lose Albany; unpacking out to combined mayor’s 2030 plan Fox, Dow Jones THE INSIDER, PAGE 14 BY MATTHEW FLAMM BUSINESS LIVES last week, Rupert Murdoch, in a ap images familiar role as insurrectionist, up- RUPERT MURDOCH might bring in a JOINING THE PARTY set the already turbulent media compatible editor for The Wall Street Journal. landscape with his $5 billion offer for Dow Jones & Co. But associ- NEIL RUBLER of Vantage Properties ates and observers of the News media platform—including the has acquired several Corp. chairman say that last week planned Fox Business cable chan- thousand affordable was nothing compared with what’s nel—and take market share away housing units in the in store if he acquires the property. from rivals like CNBC, Reuters past 16 months. Campaign staffers They foresee a reinvigorated and the Financial Times. trade normal lives for a Dow Jones brand that will combine Furthermore, The Wall Street with News Corp.’s global assets to Journal would vie with The New chance at the White NEW POWER BROKERS House PAGE 39 create the foremost financial news York Times to shape the national and information provider.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leveson Inquiry Into the Cultures, Practices And
    For Distribution to CPs THE LEVESON INQUIRY INTO THE CULTURES, PRACTICES AND ETHICS OE THE PRESS WITNESS STATEMENT OE JAMES HANNING I, JAMES HANNING of Independent Print Limited, 2 Derry Street, London, W8 SHF, WILL SAY; My name is James Hanning. I am deputy editor of the Independent on Sunday and, with Francis Elliott of The Times, co-author of a biography of David Cameron. In the course of co-writing and updating our book we spoke to a large number of people, but equally I am very conscious that I, at least, dipped into areas in which I can claim very little specialist knowledge, so I would emphasise that in several respects there are a great many people better placed to comment and much of what follows is impressionistic. I hope that what follows is germane to some of the relationships that Lord Justice Leveson has asked witnesses to discuss. I hesitate to try to draw a broader picture, but I hope that some conclusions about the disproportionate influence of a particular sector of the media can be drawn from my experience. My interest in the area under discussion in the Third Module stems from two topics. One is in David Cameron, on whose biography we began work in late 2005, soon after Cameron became Tory leader. The second is an interest in phone hacking at the News of the World. Tory relations with Murdoch Since early 2007, the Conservative leadership has been extremely keen to ingratiate itself with the Murdoch empire. It is striking how it had become axiomatic that the support of the Murdoch papers was essential for winning a general election.
    [Show full text]
  • The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review
    The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review Third Edition Editor John P Janka Law Business Research The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review THIRD EDITION Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in TheT echnology, Media and Telecommunications Review, 3rd edition (published in October 2012 – editor John P Janka). For further information please email [email protected] 2 The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review THIRD EDITION Editor John P Janka Law Business Research Ltd The Law Reviews THE MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS REVIEW THE RESTRUCTURING REVIEW THE PRIVATE COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION REVIEW THE EMPLOYMENT LAW REVIEW THE PUBLIC COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE BANKING REGULATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION REVIEW THE MERGER CONTROL REVIEW THE TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVIEW THE INWARD INVESTMENT AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION REVIEW THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REVIEW THE CORPORATE IMMIGRATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW THE PROJECTS AND CONSTRUCTION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MARKETS REVIEW THE REAL ESTATE LAW REVIEW THE PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW THE ENERGY REGULATION AND MARKETS REVIEW THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW THE ASSET MANAGEMENT REVIEW THE PRIVATE WEALTH AND PRIVATE CLIENT REVIEW www.TheLawReviews.co.uk PUBLISHER Gideon Roberton BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Adam Sargent MARKETING MANAGERS Nick Barette, Katherine Jablonowska, Alexandra Wan PUBLISHING ASSISTANT Lucy Brewer EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Lydia Gerges PRODUCTION MANAGER Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Joanne Morley SUBEDITOR Caroline Rawson EDITor-in-CHIEF Callum Campbell MANAGING DIRECTOR Richard Davey Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2012 Law Business Research Ltd © Copyright in individual chapters vests with the contributors No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Hacking Affair Is Not Over – but What Would a Second Leveson Inquiry Achieve?
    7/10/2019 Hacking affair is not over – but what would a second Leveson inquiry achieve? Academic rigour, journalistic flair Hacking affair is not over – but what would a second Leveson inquiry achieve? July 25, 2014 3.57pm BST Author John Jewell Director of Undergraduate Studies, School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, Cardiff University On we go. Ian Nicholson/PA In the latest episode in the long-running saga that is the phone hacking affair, Dan Evans, a former journalist at the News of the World and Sunday Mirror, has received a 10 month suspended sentence after being convicted of two counts of phone hacking, one of making illegal payments to officials, and one of perverting the course of justice. Coming so soon after the conviction of Andy Coulson and the acquittal of Rebekah Brooks and others, one could be forgiven for assuming that the whole phone hacking business is now done and dusted. Not a bit of it. As Julian Petley has written: “Eleven more trials are due to take place involving 20 current or former Sun and News of the World journalists, who are accused variously of making illegal payments to public officials, conspiring to intercept voicemail and accessing data on stolen mobile phones.” We also learned in June that Scotland Yard had officially told Rupert Murdoch of their intention to interview him as part of their inquiry into allegations of crime at his British newspapers. The Guardian revealed that Murdoch was first contacted in 2013, but the police ceded to his lawyers’ request that any interrogation should wait until the Coulson–Brooks trial had finished.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quiet Revolution
    A quiet revolution The moral economies shaping journalists’ use of NGO-provided multimedia in mainstream news about Africa Katherine Wright Goldsmiths, University of London A thesis submitted for the degree of PhD in Media and Communications 2014 1 Declaration I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person, nor material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of the university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text. 2 Acknowledgements With grateful thanks to my study participants for their time, trust and candour - without you there would be no study. I also want to thank my supervisor, Natalie Fenton, who manages to combine the sharpest of minds with the warmest of hearts. Your support has meant so much to me over the past few years. The encouragement and constructive criticism of others at Goldsmiths has also been invaluable, especially Aeron Davis, Des Freedman and Gholam Khiabany, who all kindly read drafts of chapters for me. Next, I want to note my debt to my dear colleagues in Journalism at the University of Roehampton. I especially want to thank Ros Coward, whose passionate belief that practitioners should ‘get into’ research started me off down this route in the first place. In addition, the words of advice and support from colleagues at other institutions have been really helpful, especially those of Mel Bunce, Lilie Chouliaraki, Glenda Cooper, Nick Couldry, Shani Orgad, Chris Paterson, Martin Scott, Helen Yanacopulos and Silvio Waisbord.
    [Show full text]
  • Freepint Report: Product Review of Factiva
    FreePint Report: Product Review of Factiva December 2014 Product Review of Factiva In-depth, independent review of the product, plus links to related resources “...has some 32,000 sources spanning all forms of content of which thousands are not available on the free web. Some source archives go back to 1951...” [SAMPLE] www.freepint.com © Free Pint Limited 2014 Contents Introduction & Contact Details 4 Sources - Content and Coverage 5 Technology - Search and User Interface 8 Technology - Outputs, Analytics, Alerts, Help 18 Value - Competitors, Development & Pricing 29 FreePint Buyer’s Guide: News 33 Other Products 35 About the Reviewer 36 ^ Back to Contents | www.freepint.com - 2 - © Free Pint Limited 2014 About this Report Reports FreePint raises the value of information in the enterprise, by publishing articles, reports and resources that support information sources, information technology and information value. A FreePint Subscription provides customers with full access to everything we publish. Customers can share individual articles and reports with anyone at their organisations as part of the terms and conditions of their license. Some license levels also enable customers to place materials on their intranets. To learn more about FreePint, visit http://www.freepint.com/ Disclaimer FreePint Report: Product Review of Factiva (ISBN 978-1-78123-181-4) is a FreePint report published by Free Pint Limited. The opinions, advice, products and services offered herein are the sole responsibility of the contributors. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the publication, the publishers cannot accept responsibility for any errors or omissions. Except as covered by subscriber or purchaser licence agreement, this publication MAY NOT be copied and/or distributed without the prior written agreement of the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikileaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL PATRICIA L. BELLIA WikiLeaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures ABSTRACT. WikiLeaks' successive disclosures of classified U.S. documents throughout 2010 and 2011 invite comparison to publishers' decisions forty years ago to release portions of the Pentagon Papers, the classified analytic history of U.S. policy in Vietnam. The analogy is a powerful weapon for WikiLeaks' defenders. The Supreme Court's decision in the Pentagon Papers case signaled that the task of weighing whether to publicly disclose leaked national security information would fall to publishers, not the executive or the courts, at least in the absence of an exceedingly grave threat of harm. The lessons of the PentagonPapers case for WikiLeaks, however, are more complicated than they may first appear. The Court's per curiam opinion masks areas of substantial disagreement as well as a number of shared assumptions among the Court's members. Specifically, the Pentagon Papers case reflects an institutional framework for downstream disclosure of leaked national security information, under which publishers within the reach of U.S. law would weigh the potential harms and benefits of disclosure against the backdrop of potential criminal penalties and recognized journalistic norms. The WikiLeaks disclosures show the instability of this framework by revealing new challenges for controlling the downstream disclosure of leaked information and the corresponding likelihood of "unintermediated" disclosure by an insider; the risks of non-media intermediaries attempting to curtail such disclosures, in response to government pressure or otherwise; and the pressing need to prevent and respond to leaks at the source. AUTHOR.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Scion James Murdoch Quits News Corp Board 1 August 2020
    Media scion James Murdoch quits News Corp board 1 August 2020 Disney acquired most of the group's assets. James Murdoch, 47, has recently been critical of his father's business and its media coverage. In January, he denounced the climate change skepticism of some Murdoch media, citing coverage of the fires which devastated large parts of Australia. He has launched his own private holding company called Lupa Systems, which among other things has taken a stake in Vice Media. "We're grateful to James for his many years of James Murdoch, who has resigned from News Corp, has service to the company. We wish him the very best been critical of the business and its media coverage in his future endeavors," said Rupert Murdoch, executive chairman of News Corp and James's brother Lachlan Murdoch in a statement. Former 21st Century Fox chief executive James © 2020 AFP Murdoch, son of media tycoon Rupert Murdoch, has resigned from News Corp's board, according to a document released Friday by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). A letter sent by James Murdoch to the board said the decision was due to "disagreements over certain editorial content published by the company's news outlets and certain other strategic decisions." News Corp owns the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, The Times and the Sun newspapers among others, but not Rupert Murdoch's Fox News network. James Murdoch was once seen as his father's successor, but Friday's move reinforces his disengagement from the family media empire, which grew from a newspaper group in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Puzzle of Media Power: Notes Toward a Materialist Approach
    International Journal of Communication 8 (2014), 319–334 1932–8036/20140005 The Puzzle of Media Power: Notes Toward a Materialist Approach DES FREEDMAN Goldsmiths, University of London In any consideration of the relationship between communication and global power shifts and of the ways in which the media are implicated in new dynamics of power, the concept of media power is frequently invoked as a vital agent of social and communicative change. This article sets out to develop a materialist approach to media power that acknowledges its role in social reproduction through the circulation of symbolic goods but suggests that we also need an understanding of media power that focuses on the relationships between actors, institutions, and contexts that organize the allocation of material resources concentrated in the media. It is hardly controversial to suggest that the media are powerful social actors, but what is the nature of this power? Does it refer to people, institutions, processes, or capacities? If we are to understand the role of communication as it relates to contemporary circumstances of neoliberalism, globalization, cosmopolitanism, and digitalization (which this special section sets out to consider), then we need a definition of media power that is sufficiently complex and robust to evaluate its channels, networks, participants, and implications. This article suggests that, just as power is not a tangible property visible only in its exercise, media power is best conceived as a relationship between different interests engaged in struggles for a range of objectives that include legitimation, influence, control, status, and, increasingly, profit. Strangely, one of the clearest metaphors for media power in recent years involves a horse.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirty Power: Burnt Country 1 Greenpeace Australia Pacific Greenpeace Australia Pacific
    How the fossil fuel industry, News Corp, and the Federal Government hijacked the Black Summer bushfires to prevent action on climate change Dirty Power: Burnt Country 1 Greenpeace Australia Pacific Greenpeace Australia Pacific Lead author Louis Brailsford Contributing authors Nikola Čašule Zachary Boren Tynan Hewes Edoardo Riario Sforza Design Olivia Louella Authorised by Kate Smolski, Greenpeace Australia Pacific, Sydney May 2020 www.greenpeace.org.au TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 4 1. Introduction 6 2. The Black Summer bushfires 7 3. Deny, minimise, adapt: The response of the Morrison Government 9 Denial 9 Minimisation 10 Adaptation and resilience 11 4. Why disinformation benefits the fossil fuel industry 12 Business as usual 13 Protecting the coal industry 14 5. The influence of the fossil fuel lobby on government 16 6. Political donations and financial influence 19 7. News Corp’s disinformation campaign 21 News Corp and climate denialism 21 News Corp, the Federal Government and the fossil fuel industry 27 8. #ArsonEmergency: social media disinformation and the role of News Corp and the Federal Government 29 The facts 29 #ArsonEmergency 30 Explaining the persistence of #ArsonEmergency 33 Timeline: #ArsonEmergency, News Corp and the Federal Government 36 9. Case study – “He’s been brainwashed”: Attacking the experts 39 10. Case study – Matt Kean, the Liberal party minister who stepped out of line 41 11. Conclusions 44 End Notes 45 References 51 Dirty Power: Burnt Country 3 Greenpeace Australia Pacific EXECUTIVE SUMMARY stronger action to phase out fossil fuels, was aided by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp media empire, and a Australia’s 2019/20 Black coordinated campaign of social media disinformation.
    [Show full text]
  • For Personal Use Only Use Personal For
    News Corp To Acquire Social Video Ad Platform Unruly ● Unruly Connects Leading Brands With Massive Global Audiences ● Tracks Video Shareability To Predict Virality For Advertisers ● Unruly's Global Platform To Accelerate News Corp's Digital Transformation New York, NY – (September 16, 2015) – News Corp announced today that it has agreed to acquire Unruly Holdings Limited ("Unruly"), a leading global ad platform that is revolutionizing digital and social video advertising for clients around the world. "Unruly is a feisty and creative company with a start-up sensibility that fits perfectly with our own approach to developing businesses in the digital age. The acquisition will serve as a catalyst for our brands, helping to extend our expertise in the digital and mobile video area, whether through the fast-growing realtor.com® in the US, Fox Sports in Australia, News America Marketing, HarperCollins Publishers, or our market-leading mastheads around the world. Unruly complements our traditional editorial and commercial expertise with contemporary insight into how people read, watch, buy and sell in the digital era," said Robert Thomson, Chief Executive of News Corp. "We have a track record of acquiring businesses with unique capabilities, allowing them the freedom to do what they do best, while providing a global platform to accelerate their growth and realize their potential." Led by Unruly's three co-founders, it will operate as a separate business unit, reporting to Rebekah Brooks, Chief Executive of News UK. Unruly will continue to work with its existing roster of global advertisers and publishers and collaborate with News Corp businesses around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 10-K Filed by News Corp with SEC
    ASX Announcement 11 August 2021 Form 10-K filed by News Corp with SEC On behalf of REA Group Ltd (ASX:REA) please find attached Form 10-K as filed by News Corp with the SEC for Q4 FY21 -ends- For further information, please contact: REA Group Ltd Investors: REA Group Ltd Media: Graham Curtin Prue Deniz General Manager Group Reporting Executive Manager Corporate Affairs P: +61 3 8456 4288 M: + 61 438 588 460 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] The release of this announcement was authorised by Tamara Kayser, Company Secretary. About REA Group Ltd: (www.rea-group.com): REA Group Ltd ACN 068 349 066 (ASX:REA) (“REA Group”) is a multinational digital advertising business specialising in property. REA Group operates Australia’s leading residential and commercial property websites – realestate.com.au and realcommercial.com.au – as well as the leading website dedicated to share property, Flatmates.com.au. REA Group owns Smartline Home Loans Pty Ltd and Mortgage Choice Ltd, Australian mortgage broking franchise groups, and PropTrack Pty Ltd, a leading provider of property data services. In Australia, REA Group holds strategic investments in Simpology Pty Ltd, a leading provider of mortgage application and e-lodgement solutions for the broking and lending industries; Realtair Pty Ltd, a digital platform providing end-to-end technology solutions for the real estate transaction process, Campaign Agent Pty Ltd, Australia’s leading provider of Buy Now Pay Later solutions for the Australian real estate market and Managed Platforms Pty Ltd, an emerging Property Management software platform.
    [Show full text]