The Migration of Lapland Longspurs to Alaska

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Migration of Lapland Longspurs to Alaska July]19611 327 THE MIGRATION OF LAPLAND LONGSPURS TO ALASKA LAURENCE IRVING E^RL¾in May Lapland Longspurs,Calcarius lapponicus• arrive at Anaktuvuk Passin the centerof the BrooksRange of arctic Alaska in large flocksthat fly swiftly northward in compactformations or stop to feed among the hummocksof sedgethat are exposedthrough the snow (Irving, 1960a). Judgingfrom my observations,verbal reports, and compilationsby Gabrielsonand Lincoln (1959), theselongspurs are generallythe commonestnesting species of the Alaskanarctic tundra. They also nest in westernAlaska over the grassyland beyondthe forestsas far southas the AlaskaPeninsula, on St. Lawrence(Fay and Cade, 1959) and other islandsin the Bering Sea (Preble and Atee, 1923), and alongthe AleutianIslands to Attu (Murie, 1959). Publishedreports (Friedmmm,1935) showthe occurrenceof LaplandLong- spurson Kodiak. Unpublishedreports (Fish and Wildlife Service) indicatethat they are commonsummer residentsin the Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge, which comprisesa large part of Kodiak Island. The extent of their presenceon Kenai Peninsulais not clearly shownin publications.Comments of residentson the northwesternshore indicatethat longspurspass that part of Kenai in migra- tion. Nestingprobably occurs on Kodiak and possiblyon Kenai, but I have not been able to verify this. On Middleton Island in the Gulf of Alaska (Rausch, 1958), the nestingof longspurs is detached from their arctic and western Alaskan nesting grounds. They have also been reported nesting in the interior of Alaska at Mt. McKinley National Park (Dixon, 1938); and, accordingto Gabrielsonand Lincoln (1959), George Schaller found them nesting at Black Lake in the Talkeetna Mountains. Except for the reported nesting of longspurs in these mountainous areas of the interior, the nesting populationof the mainland of Alaska is settled in a peripheral band about its arctic and western perimeter (Figure 1). South of Barrow this heavily populated band extends from the coast about 320 kilometers (200 miles) inland to the forest. Elsewhere on the malnland the densely occupiednesting area is no wider, but it extends to the islands in the Bering Sea, southwestwardalong the Alaska Peninsula and for some 2,200 kilometers (1,400 miles) into the Pacific Ocean over the Aleutian Islands. Since longspurs are the commonest birds nesting over this great area, they are one of the most numerousarian populatlons in northwestern America. The breedingLapland Longspursof Alaska are ascribedto the sub- speciesC. 1.alascensis Ridgway (A.O.U. Check-list,1957) and are said to winter in interior western states and as far north as southern British Columbia(Munro and Cowan,1947). Taking latitude 50ø and longi- tude 134ø as referencepoints for the northwesternpart of this wintering area, their migrationwould extend 20 ø of latitudenorthward and 14ø of longitudewestward to the eastern nestinglimits of the race in 328 IRw•,'(;,Migration of LaplandLongspurs [Vol.[ Auk78 160ø 150ø 140e 130e 120• 70 e 60* 160• 150• 140 ß Figure l. Northwesternrange of Calcariuslapponicus (diagonal hatched) and location of well-recorded directional migration in spring (heavy arrows). 3,lackenzie(A.O.U. Check-list,1957). In the westernmostAleutian Islandsthe migrationwould extend their summerrange only 4 ø north- ward but 67ø westward. During severalyears I have been gathering evidencefor the courseand programof this extendedand large migra- tion in Alaska. MIGRATION THROUGH THE BROOKS RANGE Froin 1948 to 1960 Simon Paneak, a resident of Anaktuvuk Pass (latitude 68ø 19' N., longitude 151ø 26' W. in the central part of the Brooks Range), recordedfor me his observationsof birds and thoseof his family and neighbors. In 1949 ThomasBrower kept recordsthere during April, May, and June. Theseobservations are supportedby many specimens.I have beenat Anaktuvukduring all or part of five spring migrations. In 10 years of suitablerecords the first Lapland Longspurswere recordedat Anaktuvuk on 1 May 1949, 29 April 1951, 9 May 1952,4 May 1953,13 May 1954,5 May 1956,8 May 1957,3 May 19'58,11 May 1959, and 29 April 1960; the averagedate of these ar- rivals being 5 May. Julyl1961] IRWN½,Migration of LaphindLongspurs 329 The dates of first recordedarrivals of longspursare more variable than for many arctic species.The daily recordsof migrationsduring eight yearsare completeenough to showthat after their first arrival on the averagedate of 5 May only a few longspurs,usually identified as males,were seenbefore the averagedate of 17 May (11 to 20 May). On that averagedate flocksof 40 or "many" first appeared.Thereafter, for 10 days,numbers recorded by Tom Browerwere as largeas 2,000 a day in flocksthat commonlyincluded from 50 to 150 longspurs. Until about 20 May the flocks included mainly males, but thereafter the proportionof femalesincreased. The less conspicuousappearance and behaviorof femalelongspurs may have biasedreports, but we have not noticeda late excessof femalesthat would offset the obvionsearly preponderanceof males. Like pipits, ,4nthus spinoletta (Irving, 1960b), and several other species,the first male longspursarrive at Anaktuvuk fat and with partially developedtestes (Irving, 1960a, p. 123). After 15 May the testeshad reachedfull breedingsize, and flight songsbegan to be noticed among coherent flocks that were apparently still migrating northward. Pairing was recordedas early as 20 May, nest buildinga few days later, and first eggsjust before1 June in most years. In the confusionof so many migrating flocksI did not discernwhether entire flocks separated and settled at Anaktuvuk or whether individuals droppedout as they paired and nestedthere while the remainderof the flocks continued northward. The great northwardmigration of longspursthrough Anaktuvuk con- tinues for about 10 days after the averagedate of 17 May and inter- mittently for a few more days. The large numbersthat remain to nest are an insignificantpart of the many flocksthat passswiftly northward or occasionallyalight to feedand drink busilyas if in hasteto continue. Occasionallya flock has beenwatched while groundedfor severalhours, but I have not searchedto find if the migrants roost overnight in the valley. Sometimesa flock circlesor makes a short flight, and on a few occasionsflights have been seen to pass southwardout of view. In most of the flocksthe movementis well coordinated,closely organized, and pursuesits coursenorthward. I have gained the impressionthat the northward movementof longspursat Anaktuvuk is as pronounced a directionalmigration as is the tremendousmovement of eider ducks flying eastwardin springalong the arctic coastpast Barrow. The long- spur is the most numerousmigrant to passAnaktuvuk in spring, an(1 many thousandsare transferredtoward the arctic slope. Althoughthe NunamiutEskimos now are basedat AnaktuvukPass, 330 IRVING,Migration of LaplandLongspurx [Vol.[ Auk78 their olderpeople have lived in manyvalleys of the BrooksRang• betweenlongitude 150ø and 158ø , which their ancestorsoccupied as nomadic caribou hunters. These Eskimos named six other valleys through which longspursmigrate northward in numberscomparable with or exceedingthe migration at Anaktuvuk and indicatedthat all valleyswere utilized accordingto the extent of their grassyland. I have seentheir migration through the Killik Valley and Howard Pass. Recordsfrom Anaktuvuk show that the earliestreports of longspurs in springdiffer from year to year morethan is the casefor other arctic migrants,each species of which commonlyarrives within'a few days of its regular date. Further, as a result of close observationby resi- dent people,it is apparentthat after the earliestlongspur was noticed, on the average 12 days elapsedwhile only a few individuals,mostly males,were seenuntil numericallysignificant migration in flocksbegan suddenlyand continuedfor 10 or 15 days. This rather unusualprogram of migration may be peculiarto the longspursat Anaktuvuk; or it may be that the observationof migration by many Eskimos resident in open tundra, where visibility is especiallygood and migration is con- strictedin a narrow valley, detectsthe few early migrantsthat escape the view of singleobservers at lessfavorable positions. MIGRATION ELSEWHERE IN THE WESTERN ARCTIC Longspursnest near Kittigazuitin the MackenzieDelta '(Porsild, 1943). Severalreports of migrationand nestingon the arctic coastof Yukon Territory have been compiledby Rand (1946), and Kesseland Schaller (1960) recentlyfound a few nestingnear the headwatersof the Sheenjek River in the northeasternAlaskan Brooks Range. We did not find them in the valley or on the tundra within 16 kilometers (10 miles) north of Old Crow, Yukon Territory (Irving, 1960a). While watching the spring arrivals at Demarcation Point and Humphrey Point, respectively,in 1914, Brooks (1915) and Dixon (1943) reportedthat a few longspursarrived there to nest. From their accountsand from the reportsof Eskimoswho have lived on the eastern arctic coast of Alaska, I have concludedthat there is no evidencefor a westward migration passing from Mackenzie Valley coastwiseinto Alaska (Irving, 1960a). Alfred Bailey (1948) reportedthat longspursseemed suddenly to arrive at Barrow and all alongthe westernarctic coastin the third week of May. During the 1st International Polar Year John Murdoch (1885)reported their arrival at Barrowon 20 May 1880. Sincemigra- tioncoastwise along the northeasternAlaskan coast has n6t beenre- July}1961J IRVING,Migration of LaplandLongspurs ported,I havetaken for grantedthat migrantsto the arcticslope
Recommended publications
  • First Nations & Transboundary Claimants
    How to Contact Yukon First Nations & Transboundary Claimants Carcross/Tagish First Nation Kaska Ta’an Kwäch’än Council Box 130 Liard First Nation 117 Industrial Road Carcross, YT Y0B 1B0 Box 328 Whitehorse, YT Y1A 2T8 Location: Turn off Klondike Hwy at Watson Lake, YT Y0A 1C0 Tel (867) 668-3613 south end of bridge Location: On Campbell Hwy, across Fax (867) 667-4295 Tel (867) 821-4251 from high school/Yukon College Tel (867) 821-8216 – Lands Admin. Tel (867) 536-5200 – Administration Teslin Tlingit Council Fax (867) 821-4802 Tel (867) 536-2912 – Land Claims Fax (867) 536-2109 Box 133 Teslin, YT Y0A 1B0 Champagne and Aishihik First Nations Ross River Dena Council Location: On southwest side of General Delivery Alaska Highway Box 5309 Ross River, YT Y0B 1S0 Tel (867) 390-2532 – Administration Haines Junction, YT Y0B 1L0 Location: Near Dena General Store Tel (867) 390-2005 – Lands Location: Turn off Alaska Hwy, Tel (867) 969-2278 – Administration Fax (867) 390-2204 across from FasGas, follow signs Tel (867) 969-2832 – Economic Tel (867) 634-2288 – Administration Development Fax (867) 969-2405 Tetlit Gwich’in Council Tel (867) 634-4211 – Ren. Res. Mgr. Fax (867) 634-2108 Box 30 Little Salmon/Carmacks Fort MacPherson, NWT X0E 0J0 In Whitehorse: First Nation Location: On Tetlit Gwichin Road #100 – 304 Jarvis Street Tel (867) 952-2330 Whitehorse, YT Y1A 2H2 Box 135 Fax (867) 952-2212 Tel (867) 668-3627 Carmacks, YT Y0B 1C0 Fax (867) 667-6202 Location: Turn west off Klondike Hwy at north end of bridge to admin bldg Tr’ondëk Hwëch'in Inuvialuit Regional Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic
    water Review Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic Valentina S. Artamonova 1, Ivan N. Bolotov 2,3,4, Maxim V. Vinarski 4 and Alexander A. Makhrov 1,4,* 1 A. N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Molecular Ecology and Phylogenetics, Northern Arctic Federal University, 163002 Arkhangelsk, Russia; [email protected] 3 Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia 4 Laboratory of Macroecology & Biogeography of Invertebrates, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Analysis of zoogeographic, paleogeographic, and molecular data has shown that the ancestors of many fresh- and brackish-water cold-tolerant hydrobionts of the Mediterranean region and the Danube River basin likely originated in East Asia or Central Asia. The fish genera Gasterosteus, Hucho, Oxynoemacheilus, Salmo, and Schizothorax are examples of these groups among vertebrates, and the genera Magnibursatus (Trematoda), Margaritifera, Potomida, Microcondylaea, Leguminaia, Unio (Mollusca), and Phagocata (Planaria), among invertebrates. There is reason to believe that their ancestors spread to Europe through the Paratethys (or the proto-Paratethys basin that preceded it), where intense speciation took place and new genera of aquatic organisms arose. Some of the forms that originated in the Paratethys colonized the Mediterranean, and overwhelming data indicate that Citation: Artamonova, V.S.; Bolotov, representatives of the genera Salmo, Caspiomyzon, and Ecrobia migrated during the Miocene from I.N.; Vinarski, M.V.; Makhrov, A.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon and Alaska Circle Tour Introduce Yourself to Northern Culture and History in Whitehorse, Then Relive Dawson City’S Gold Rush by Panning for Gold
    © Government of Yukon Yukon and Alaska Circle Tour Introduce yourself to northern culture and history in Whitehorse, then relive Dawson City’s gold rush by panning for gold. Learn about First Nations culture from Aboriginal people. Drive a highway at the roof of the world, paddle and raft remote rivers, hike, catch a summer festival or relax in hot springs under the Midnight Sun. Approx. distance = ALASKA 1 Whitehorse 9 Boundary 9 1073 mi (1728 km) 10 (Alaska) 8 YUKON 2 Braeburn 11-12 days 11 10 Chicken (Alaska) 3 Carmacks 12 7 11 4 Pelly Crossing Tok (Alaska) 5 6 4 12 Beaver Creek 5 Stewart Crossing 13 3 13 Destruction Bay 2 6 Mayo 14 NORTHWEST 14 Haines Junction 7 Keno 1 TERRITORIES Whitehorse 1 Whitehorse 8 Dawson City NUNAVUT Start: DAY 1-2 – Whitehorse Yukon International Storytelling Festival Northern Lights Tours Celebrate the North’s rich storytelling tradition under the Midnight Mid-August through April, experience brilliant displays of the Aurora Sun annually. Listen to performers from circumpolar countries and Borealis. Several tour operators offer excursions to see these beyond. In October. celestial night shows when multi-colored streamers of light shimmer overhead while you watch from a secluded log cabin or while MacBride Museum of Yukon History soaking in natural mineral waters at Takhini Hot Springs pools. Learn about the Klondike gold rush and the development of the Canadian north. Check out displays of First Nations traditions, the Muktuk Adventures legacy of Canadian poet Robert Service, and the Mounted Police Get to know sled dogs and puppies at a kennel and B&B.
    [Show full text]
  • CHON-FM Whitehorse and Its Transmitters – Licence Renewal
    Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2015-278 PDF version Reference: 2015-153 Ottawa, 23 June 2015 Northern Native Broadcasting, Yukon Whitehorse, Yukon and various locations in British Columbia, Northwest Territories and Yukon Application 2014-0868-3, received 29 August 2014 CHON-FM Whitehorse and its transmitters – Licence renewal The Commission renews the broadcasting licence for the Type B Native radio station CHON-FM Whitehorse and its transmitters from 1 September 2015 to 31 August 2021. This shortened licence term will allow for an earlier review of the licensee’s compliance with the regulatory requirements. Introduction 1. Northern Native Broadcasting, Yukon filed an application to renew the broadcasting licence for the Type B Native radio station CHON-FM Whitehorse and its transmitters CHCK-FM Carmacks, CHHJ-FM Haines Junction, CHOL-FM Old Crow, CHON-FM-2 Takhini River Subdivision, CHON-FM-3 Johnson’s Crossing, CHPE-FM Pelly Crossing, CHTE-FM Teslin, VF2024 Klukshu, VF2027 Watson Lake, VF2028 Mayo, VF2035 Ross River, VF2038 Upper Liard, VF2039 Carcross, VF2049 Dawson City, VF2125 Takhini River Subdivision, VF2126 Keno City, VF2127 Stewart Crossing, VF2128 Tagish, VF2147 Destruction Bay, VF2148 Whitehorse (Mayo Road Subdivision), VF2311 Lower Post and VF2414 Faro, Yukon; VF2306 Atlin and VF2353 Good Hope Lake, British Columbia; VF2354 Aklavik, and VF2498 Tsiigehtchic (Arctic Red River), Northwest Territories, which expires on 31 August 2015. The Commission did not receive any interventions regarding this application. Non-compliance 2. Section 9(2) of the Radio Regulations, 1986 (the Regulations) requires licensees to file an annual return by 30 November of each year for the broadcast year ending the previous 31 August.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchuria Documents to Examine
    Source 1 Source Information: The Legacy of the Soviet Union Offensives of August 1945 https://amti.csis.org/the-legacy-of-the-soviet-offensives-of-august-1945/ ____________________________________________________________________________ THE LEGACY OF THE SOVIET OFFENSIVES OF AUGUST 1945 BY JEFF MANKOFF | AUGUST 13, 2015 JAPAN, RUSSIA, UNITED STATES The Second World War was an unparalleled calamity for the Soviet Union. As many as 27 million Soviet soldiers and civilians died as a result of the conflict that started with the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 and ended with the Japanese surrender in August 1945. Consumed by this existential struggle along its western border, the Soviet Union was a comparatively minor factor in the Pacific War until the very end. Yet Moscow’s timely intervention in the war against Japan allowed it to expand its influence along the Pacific Rim. With the breakdown of Allied unity soon heralding the onset of the Cold War, Soviet gains in Asia also left a legacy of division and confrontation, some of which endure into the present. By the 1930s, Stalin’s Soviet Union and Imperial Japan both viewed themselves as rising powers with ambitions to extend their territorial holdings. In addition to a strategic rivalry dating back to the 19th century, they now nursed an ideological enmity born of the Bolshevik Revolution and the ultraconservative military’s growing hold on Japanese politics. In 1935, Japan signed the AntiComintern Pact with Hitler’s Germany, laying the foundation for the creation of the Axis (Fascist Italy would join the following year). The two militaries engaged in a series of skirmishes along the frontier between Soviet Siberia and Japanese-occupied Manchuria (Manchukuo) during the late 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I Author(S): Hugh M
    Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I Author(s): Hugh M. Raup Source: Botanical Review, Vol. 7, No. 3, Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I (Mar., 1941), pp. 147-208 Published by: Springer on behalf of New York Botanical Garden Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4353246 Accessed: 15-12-2017 21:12 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Springer, New York Botanical Garden Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Botanical Review This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:12:58 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms THE BOTANICAL REVIEW VOL. VII MARCH, 1941 No. 3 BOTANICAL PROBLEMS IN BOREAL AMERICA. I HUGH M. RAUP Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ................ ........................... 148 Acknowledgments . ........................................... 150 Exploration .............. ............................. 151 Physiographic History ........................................... 161 Climate ........................................................... 169 Origin and Distribution of the Flora Speciation and Endemism .173 The Theory of Persistence The Darwin-Hooker Concept ............................... 178 The Nunatak Hypothesis .......... .......... 181 Conservatism vs. Aggressiveness ............................. 184 Wynne-Edwards' Criticism of the Nunatak Hypothesis . 186 Discussion of Wynne-Edwards' Criticism .188 Hulten's Studies of Arctic and Boreal Biota Statement of the Problem .198 Plastic vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Fire Hazard Abatement Plan
    HAINES JUNCTION COMMUNITY FUEL ABATEMENT PLAN August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Haines Junction Community Concerns ......................................................... 1 1.2. Forests and Fire Behaviour ........................................................................... 2 2.0 BACKGROUND.................................................................................................... 5 3.0 COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION.............................................................................. 8 3.1 Location......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Forest Environment ....................................................................................... 8 3.3 Fire History.................................................................................................. 10 3.4 Fire Suppression Capability......................................................................... 11 4.0 FUEL ABATEMENT APPLICATION................................................................... 12 5.0 STRATEGY ........................................................................................................ 13 5.1 Community Zone Strategy........................................................................... 13 5.2 Interface Zone Strategy..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon & the Dempster Highway Road Trip
    YUKON & THE DEMPSTER HIGHWAY ROAD TRIP Yukon & the Dempster Highway Road Trip Yukon & Alaska Road Trip 15 Days / 14 Nights Whitehorse to Whitehorse Priced at USD $1,642 per person INTRODUCTION The Dempster Highway road trip is one of the most spectacular self drives on earth, and yet, many people have never heard of it. It’s the only road in Canada that takes you across the Arctic Circle, entering the land of the midnight sun where the sky stays bright for 24 hours a day. Explore subarctic wilderness at Tombstone National Park, witness wildlife at the Yukon Wildlife Preserve, see the world's largest non-polar icefields and discover the "Dog Mushing Capital of Alaska." In Inuvik, we recommend the sightseeing flight to see the Arctic Ocean from above. Itinerary at a Glance DAY 1 Whitehorse | Arrival DAY 2 Whitehorse | Yukon Wildlife Preserve DAY 3 Whitehorse to Hains Junction | 154 km/96 mi DAY 4 Kluane National Park | 250 km/155 mi DAY 5 Haines Junction to Tok | 467 km/290 mi DAY 6 Tok to Dawson City | 297 km/185 mi DAYS 7 Dawson City | Exploring DAY 8 Dawson City to Eagle Plains | 408 km/254 mi DAY 9 Eagle Plains to Inuvik | 366 km/227 mi DAY 10 Inuvik | Exploring DAY 11 Inuvik to Eagle Plains | 366 km/227 mi DAY 12 Eagle Plains to Dawson City | 408 km/254 mi Start planning your vacation in Canada by contacting our Canada specialists Call 1 800 217 0973 Monday - Friday 8am - 5pm Saturday 8.30am - 4pm Sunday 9am - 5:30pm (Pacific Standard Time) Email [email protected] Web canadabydesign.com Suite 1200, 675 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 1N2, Canada 2021/06/14 Page 1 of 5 YUKON & THE DEMPSTER HIGHWAY ROAD TRIP DAY 13 Dawson City to Mayo | 230 km/143 mi DAY 14 Mayo to Whitehorse | 406 km/252 mi DAY 15 Whitehorse | Departure MAP DETAILED ITINERARY Day 1 Whitehorse | Arrival Welcome to the “Land of the Midnight Sun”.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Impacts of Prudhoe Bay Shut Down on Alaska Refinery Output
    KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH Oil & Gas, Mining & Special Projects Office 144 N. Binkley Street Soldotna, Alaska 99669 BUSINESS: (907) 714-2335 FAX: (907) 262-8616 [email protected] www.cookinletoilandgas.org JOHN J. WILLIAMS BOROUGH MAYOR To: Mayor John J. Williams Thru: Tim Navarre, Chief of Staff Date: August 8, 2006 From: Bill Popp, Oil, Gas & Mining Liaison Subject: Possible impacts of Prudhoe Bay shut down on Alaska refinery output This preliminary analysis is a follow up on the “first take” my office provided on August 7th regarding the possible impacts of the Prudhoe Bay oil field closure. In particular, the effects on Alaska’s total refinery output of finished petroleum products and the ripple effects that may be felt in the communities of the Kenai Peninsula Borough. As pointed out in the “first take,” there could be significant impacts on in-state production of motor diesel, home heating fuels, power generation fuels, jet fuels and gasoline. These impacts could lead to price spikes and shortages for these fuels unless the refiners are able to secure either adequate alternative supplies of refined products from outside of Alaska, or alternative supply contracts for North Slope crude oil originating from fields other than Prudhoe Bay. 1. Existing refineries, total through puts and outputs and total Alaska consumption Alaska currently has 6 refineries. Two refineries are based on the North Slope and only serve that region. Two refineries are based in Fairbanks. One is based in Valdez and one is based in Nikiski. The four refineries based in Fairbanks, Valdez and Nikiski serve the major population centers of Alaska and will be the focus of this analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Yukon Hunting / Unit 25
    Fort Yukon Hunting / Unit 25 $UFWLF9LOODJH &KDQGDODU :LVHPDQ &KULVWLDQ &ROGIRRW 9HQHWLH &KDON\LWVLN )RUW<XNRQ %HDYHU %LUFK&UHHN 6WHYHQV9LOODJH )RUW+DPOLQ &LUFOH &HQWUDO 5DPSDUW /LYHQJRRG &LUFOH+RW6SULQJV (XUHND 0LQWR )R[ &KHQD )$,5%$1.6 +RW (DJOH 6SULQJV Federal Public Lands Open to Subsistence Use 2014/2016 Federal Subsistence Wildlife Regulations 115 Unit 25 / Hunting (See Unit 25 Fort Yukon map) Unit 25 consists of the Yukon River drainage upstream from (but excluding) the Hamlin Creek drainage; and excluding drainages into the south bank of the Yukon River upstream from the Charley River. Unit 25A consists of the Hodzana River drainage rivers; and drainages into the north bank of the Yukon River upstream from the Narrows; the Chandalar River drainage upstream from Circle, including the islands in the Yukon upstream from (and including) the East Fork drainage; River. the Christian River drainage upstream from Christian; the Unit 25C consists of drainages into the south bank of Sheenjek River drainage upstream from (and including) the the Yukon River upstream from Circle to the Unit 20E Thluichohnjik Creek; the Coleen River drainage; and the boundary; the Birch Creek drainage upstream from the Old Crow River drainage. Steese Highway bridge (milepost 147); the Preacher Creek Unit 25B consists of the Little Black River drainage drainage upstream from (and including) the Rock Creek upstream from (but excluding) the Big Creek drainage; drainage; and the Beaver Creek drainage upstream from the Black River drainage upstream from (and including) (and including) the Moose Creek drainage. the Salmon Fork drainage; the Porcupine River drainage Unit 25D consists of the remainder of Unit 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Regents Review Packet 16-B
    GLOBAL REGENTS REVIEW PACKET NUMBER 16-B - PAGE 1 of 24 THIS IS GLOBAL REGENTS REVIEW PACKET NUMBER 16-B THE TOPICS OF STUDY IN THIS PACKET ARE: • JAPAN’S TOKUGAWA SHOGUNATE • THE MEIJI RESTORATION • JAPANESE IMPERIALISM GLOBAL REGENTS REVIEW PACKET NUMBER 16-B - PAGE 2 of 24 JAPAN’S TOKUGAWA SHOGUNATE The Tokugawa shogunate created a FEUDAL government in Japan; FEUDALISM provided SOCIAL STABILITY; Know the social structure of feudal Japan: (Emperor>Shogun>Daimyo>Samurai>Peasants & Artisans>Merchants); Samurai = WARRIORS, they followed the CODE OF BUSHIDO; The Tokugawa shoguns ISOLATED JAPAN; geographic isolation often leads to the strengthening of traditional culture; Japanese isolation ended when Commodore Matthew Perry forced Japan to open up trade with the West. • The Tokugawa shoguns gained control of Japan in the 1600s. Tokugawa = the name of the family that ruled Japan from 1603 – 1868 shogun = the leader of Japanʼs military—this job was hereditary (it was inherited) The term shogunate refers to the Japanese government during the era it was ruled by Tokugawa shoguns. • The Tokugawa shogunate created a FEUDAL government in Japan. Feudalism is a system in which land is exchanged for military service and loyalty. FEUDALISM can be described as a DECENTRALIZED POLITICAL SYSTEM that also provides SOCIAL STABILITY (or social structure). For this reason, feudalism is sometimes referred to as a both a political system and a social system. The Global Regents Exam often compares Japanese (Tokugawa) feudalism to Medieval European feudalism. In both Japan and Europe, emperors and kings were to weak to prevent invasions or stop internal disputes. Feudalism provided a way for rulers to preserve law and order (see Regents Review Packet #5 for more on European feudalism).
    [Show full text]
  • The Nationwide Rivers Inventory APPENDIX National System Components, Study Rivers and Physiographic Maps
    The Nationwide Rivers Inventory APPENDIX National System Components, Study Rivers and Physiographic Maps The National Park Service United States Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20240 January 1982 III. Existing Components of the National System 1981 National Wild and Scenic Rivers System Components State Alaska 1 _ ** River Name County(s)* Segment Reach Agency Contact Description (mile1s) (s) Designation State Congressional Section(s) Length Date of District(s) Managing Physiographic Agency Alagnak River including AK I&W The Alagnak from 67 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Nonvianuk Kukaklek Lake to West 540 West 5th Avenue boundary of T13S, R43W Anchorage, AK 99501 and the entire Nonvianuk River. Alntna River AK B.R. The main stem within the 83 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Gates of the Arctic 540 West 5th Avenue National Park and Preserve. Anchorage, AK 99501 Andreafsky River and AK I614- Segment from its source, 262 12/2/80 FWS Fish and Wildlife Service East Fork including all headwaters 1011 E. Tudor and the East Fork, within Anchorage, AK 99503 the boundary of the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge. AK All of the river 69 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Aniakchak River P.M. including its major 540 West 5th Avenue including: Hidden Creek tributaries, Hidden Creek, Anchorage, AK 99501 Mystery Creek, Albert Mystery Creek, Albert Johnson Creek, North Fork Johnson Creek, and North Aniakchak River Fork Aniakchak River, within the Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve. *Alaska is organized by boroughs. If a river is in or partially in a borough, it is noted.
    [Show full text]