A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Conjugate Nicotine Vaccine (Nicvax®) in Smokers Who Want to Quit: 12 Months Results

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Conjugate Nicotine Vaccine (Nicvax®) in Smokers Who Want to Quit: 12 Months Results AA RandomizedRandomized PlaceboPlacebo--ControlledControlled TrialTrial ofof aa ConjugateConjugate NicotineNicotine VaccineVaccine (NicVAX(NicVAX®)) inin SmokersSmokers WhoWho WantWant toto Quit:Quit: 1212 MonthMonth ResultsResults Stephen Rennard, Douglas Jorenby, David Gonzales, Nancy Rigotti, Arjen de Vos, Enoch Bortey, Roxanne Akhavain, Dorothy Hatsukami U. Nebraska, U. Wisconsin, Oregon Health & Sciences U., Massachusetts General Hospital, Nabi Biopharmaceuticals, and U. Minnesota Supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse PresenterPresenter DisclosureDisclosure InformationInformation Stephen I Rennard A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Conjugate Nicotine Vaccine (NicVAX®) in Smokers Who Want to Quit: 12 Months Results NicVAX® is investigational DISCLOSURE INFORMATION: The following relationships exist related to this presentation: University of Nebraska Medical Center (S. Rennard, PI) received a research contract from Nabi to conduct this and one other clinical trial Since 2006, Dr. Rennard has conducted clinical trials or consulted with the following companies on the topic of smoking cessation: Pfizer, Novartis, GSK NicotineNicotine LevelsLevels inin aa SmokerSmoker Light Smoker High Withdrawal Nicotine Level Time of the day 33’’aminomethylaminomethyl NicotineNicotine –– RecombinantRecombinant Ps.Ps. aeruginosaaeruginosa ExoproteinExoprotein AA ((rEPArEPA)) ConjugateConjugate N NH2 O CH3 N + O + H2N rEPA N Nicotine O CH3 N 3’ aminomethyl Nicotine O NH NH AMNic O rEPA rEPA N CH3 N + alum (Adjuant) AMNicAMNic--rEPArEPA (NicVAX)(NicVAX) AntibodiesAntibodies Function:Function: CaptureCapture ReleaseRelease MechanismMechanism Blood Brain N I C V A X PhasePhase 22 Study:Study: KeyKey QuestionsQuestions ff DetermineDetermine mostmost effectiveeffective dosedose andand immunizationimmunization scheduleschedule ff DetermineDetermine ifif vaccinationvaccination isis associatedassociated withwith longlong termterm quitsquits ff DetermineDetermine ifif antibodyantibody responseresponse isis associatedassociated withwith longlong termterm quitsquits 6 NicVAXNicVAX PhasePhase IIbIIb TrialTrial DesignDesign A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial WeekWeek 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 26 52 Schedule 1 Schedule 1 N=50 400 µg NV TQD=7 weeks 400µg NicVAX N=50N=50 200 µg NV Follow Up N=50 200µg NicVAX Follow Up N=50N=50 Placebo (PBS + alum) TQD Week 7 Placebo (PBS) Schedule 2 26 N=51 400 µ 400 µg NV Follow Up N=50 200 µ 200 µg NV N=50 Placebo (PBS + alum) TQD Week 5 1° Endpoint Final 8 weeks Continuous Abstinence: 2 wk post TQD to 12 mo StudyStudy PopulationPopulation NicVax Placebo Demographics n=201 n=100 n=201 n=100 Baseline Smoking NicVAX Placebo Characteristics N=201 n=100 Males 54% 50% Gender Mean Number Females 46% 50% Mean Number Cigarettes 24.3 24.8 Age Mean Age 48 47 Smoked Per Day Ethnicity Not Hispanic 98% 98% Mean FTND Score 6.12 6.05 Asian 1% 3% Black 5% 7% Subjects with at Race Islander 1% 0% least 1 previous 96% 96% quit attempt White 91% 88% Other 2% 2% EarlyEarly TerminatedTerminated Subjects*Subjects* Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Placebo 200 µg 400 µg 200 µg 400 µg All Subjects 100 50 50 50 51 Early Terminated Total 33 (33%) 16 (32%) 12 (24%) 24 (48%) 22 (43%) Lost to Follow-Up 6 (6%) 5 (10%) 4 (8%) 5 (10%) 6 (12%) Non-Compliant with Protocol 1 (1%) 0 0 1 (2%) 2 (4%) Protocol Violation 000 02 (4%) Withdrawal of Consent 23 (23%) 11 (22%) 7 (14%) 16 (32%) 7 (14%) Adverse Event 2 (2%) 0 1 (2%) 2 (4%) 4 (8%) Other 1 (1%) 0 0 0 1 (2%) *All Early Terminations are coded as smoking thereafter. 9 AntibodyAntibody ConcentrationConcentration OverOver TimeTime ScheduleSchedule 11 && ScheduleSchedule 22 200 µg/Schedule 1 400 µg/Schedule 1 ) 200 µg/Schedule 2 ml / TQD TQD 400 µg/Schedule 2 g µ ( C Ab M G 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 Study Week Schedule 1 Schedule 2 1212--MonthMonth ContinuousContinuous AbstinenceAbstinence Intent to Treat Population SScchheedduullee 11 SScchheedduullee 22 NNiiccVVAAXX 6%6% 1166%% 440000 µµgg (n=3/50)(n=3/50) (( nn==88//5511)) pp==00..9966 pp==00..003388 NNiiccVVAAXX 6%6% 1144%% 220000 µµgg (n=3/50)(n=3/50) ((nn==77//5500)) pp==00..8888 pp==00..005566 PPllaacceebboo 66%% ((nn==66//110000)) ContinuousContinuous AbstinenceAbstinence atat 1212 MonthsMonths byby AntiAnti--NicotineNicotine AntibodyAntibody LevelsLevels 1122--MMoonntthh AAbbssttiinneennccee NNiiccVVAAXX 1166%% High Antibody* ((nn==1100//6611)) pp==00..0033 NNiiccVVAAXX 88%% Low Antibody ((nn==1111//114400)) pp==00..4499 PPllaacceebboo 66%% ((nn==66//110000)) *Top 30% by AUC per protocol 12 ContinuousContinuous AbstinenceAbstinence atat 1212 MonthsMonths byby AntiAnti-- NicotineNicotine AntibodyAntibody Levels,Levels, DoseDose && ScheduleSchedule 12-Month Schedule 2 Schedule 1 Continuous Abstinence 400 µg 200 µg 400 µg 200 µg Rates (44 wks) NicVAX 21% 19% 13% 10% High Antibody* (n=4/19) (n=3/16) (n=2/16) (n=1/10) p=0.038 p=0.056 p=0.57 p=0.84 NicVAX 13% 12% 3% 5% (n=4/32) (n=4/34) (n=1/34) (n=2/40) Low Antibody p=0.22 p=0.23 p=0.36 p=0.55 Placebo 6% (n=6/100) *Top 30% by AUC per protocol AntibodyAntibody--DependentDependent ReductionReduction inin CigaretteCigarette ConsumptionConsumption inin NonNon--QuittersQuitters Average Daily Cigarette Consumption (median, inter-quartile range) % Baseline @ Baseline 6-Months 12-Months 12-months NicVAX 20 7.5 10 High 50% Antibody* 18-25 4-16 4-19 NicVAX 20 13 16 Low 80% Antibody 20-30 6-18.5 5-20 Placebo 20 13 14 70% 20-30 5-19 7-20 *Top 30% by AUC per protocol 14 AdverseAdverse EventsEvents NNiiccVVAAXX PPllaacceebboo nn==220011 nn==110000 UUppppeerr RReessppiirraattoorryy 2299%% 3300%% IInnffeeccttiioonn HHeeaaddaacchhee 1122%% 1122%% IInnssoommnniiaa 1100%% 99%% NNaassoopphhaarryynnggiittiiss 99%% 1144%% NNaauusseeaa 77%% 1100%% DDiizzzziinneessss 66%% 1111%% All events ≥ 10% of either NicVAX or Placebo AdverseAdverse eventsevents leadingleading toto earlyearly terminationsterminations f Nicvax groups (7/201): ― Anaphylactic reaction ― Increasing frequency of migraine headaches ― Arthralgias in multiple joints ― Shingles ― Stiffness in left hand ― Dozing off at the wheel ― Atrial fibrillation f Placebo (2/100): ― Forgetfulness ― Exacerbation of Crohn’s disease 16 LocalLocal ReactogenicityReactogenicity –– PercentagePercentage ofof SubjectsSubjects ExperiencingExperiencing EventsEvents (ITT)(ITT) Injection 1 2 3 4 5 † ‡ NV Pbo NV Pbo NV Pbo NV Pbo NV Pbo Ache 75 83 84 85 73 81 77 69 79 68 Burning 19 17 21 24 24 19 28 13 28 6 Heat 17 18 28 30 32 21 32 20 29 15 Swelling 32 41 45 38 46 31 43 25 38 27 Redness 14 18 26 18 34 19 28 11 24 9 Tenderness 78 91 87 89 81 81 80 77 83 77 † NV = NicVAX ‡ Pbo = Placebo 17 SystemicSystemic ReactogenicityReactogenicity –– PercentagePercentage ofof SubjectsSubjects ExperiencingExperiencing EventsEvents (ITT)(ITT) Injection 1 2 3 4 5 ‡ NV† Pbo NV Pbo NV Pbo NV Pbo NV Pbo Fever 2 2 3 2 8 7 6 3 0 0 General Dis- comfort / Malaise 50 58 64 52 50 49 46 41 36 32 Headache 41 41 54 36 44 35 34 27 33 21 Muscle Aches / Myalgia 65 64 66 64 55 62 57 57 50 59 Nausea 18 22 28 21 18 13 12 12 19 15 Vomiting 1 2 5 2 1 0 4 5 4 3 † NV = NicVAX ‡ Pbo = Placebo 18 ConclusionsConclusions ffMostMost effectiveeffective dosedose andand scheduleschedule identified:identified: ScheduleSchedule 22 (5(5 injections),injections), 400400 µµgg ffAntibodyAntibody levellevel predictspredicts continuouscontinuous abstinenceabstinence ffSignificantlySignificantly increasedincreased abstinenceabstinence throughthrough 1212 monthsmonths ffSafetySafety profileprofile ――ReactogenicityReactogenicity andand adverseadverse eventsevents similarsimilar toto placeboplacebo ――NoNo evidenceevidence ofof compensatorycompensatory smokingsmoking oror increaseincrease inin withdrawalwithdrawal symptomssymptoms AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements f Clinical Investigators f National Institute on ― Dorothy Hatsukami Drug Abuse (NIDA) ― Stephen Rennard ― RO1 DA017894 ― Douglas Jorenby f Nabi ― Michael Fiore Biopharmaceuticals ― David Gonzales ― Ali Fattom ― Nancy Rigotti ― Mariya Charny ― Matt Hohenboken ― Victor Reus ― Matt Hohenboken ― Matthew Kalnik ― Cheryl Oncken ― Phyllis Link ― Donald Tashkin ― Sharon Sutton ― Mitchell Nides ― Scott Winston ― Elbert Glover ― Paul Pentel.
Recommended publications
  • CLINICAL TRIALS Safety and Immunogenicity of a Nicotine Conjugate Vaccine in Current Smokers
    CLINICAL TRIALS Safety and immunogenicity of a nicotine conjugate vaccine in current smokers Immunotherapy is a novel potential treatment for nicotine addiction. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a nicotine conjugate vaccine, NicVAX, and its effects on smoking behavior. were recruited for a noncessation treatment study and assigned to 1 of 3 doses of the (68 ؍ Smokers (N nicotine vaccine (50, 100, or 200 ␮g) or placebo. They were injected on days 0, 28, 56, and 182 and monitored for a period of 38 weeks. Results showed that the nicotine vaccine was safe and well tolerated. Vaccine immunogenicity was dose-related (P < .001), with the highest dose eliciting antibody concentrations within the anticipated range of efficacy. There was no evidence of compensatory smoking or precipitation of nicotine withdrawal with the nicotine vaccine. The 30-day abstinence rate was significantly different across with the highest rate of abstinence occurring with 200 ␮g. The nicotine vaccine appears ,(02. ؍ the 4 doses (P to be a promising medication for tobacco dependence. (Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;78:456-67.) Dorothy K. Hatsukami, PhD, Stephen Rennard, MD, Douglas Jorenby, PhD, Michael Fiore, MD, MPH, Joseph Koopmeiners, Arjen de Vos, MD, PhD, Gary Horwith, MD, and Paul R. Pentel, MD Minneapolis, Minn, Omaha, Neb, Madison, Wis, and Rockville, Md Surveys show that, although about 41% of smokers apy, is about 25% on average.2 Moreover, these per- make a quit attempt each year, less than 5% of smokers centages most likely exaggerate the efficacy of are successful at remaining abstinent for 3 months to a intervention because these trials are typically composed year.1 Smokers seeking available behavioral and phar- of subjects who are highly motivated to quit and who macologic therapies can enhance successful quit rates are free of complicating diagnoses such as depression 2 by 2- to 3-fold over control conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurocops: the Politics of Prohibition and the Future of Enforcing Social Policy from Inside the Body
    NEUROCOPS: THE POLITICS OF PROHIBITION AND THE FUTURE OF ENFORCING SOCIAL POLICY FROM INSIDE THE BODY RICHARD GLEN BOIRE1 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 216 II. FROM DEMAND REDUCTION TO DESIRE REDUCTION.......................................................................... 216 III. PHARMACOTHERAPY DRUGS ............................................... 218 A. Target: Opiates............................................................ 218 B. Target: Cocaine........................................................... 221 C. Target: Marijuana....................................................... 222 D. Targeting Legal Drugs ................................................ 223 1. Target: Nicotine.................................................... 223 2. Target: Alcohol..................................................... 225 E. Pharmacotherapy Drugs: Good, Bad, Both, or Beyond?......................................................... 225 F. From Drug War to Drug Epidemic ............................. 230 IV. NEUROCOPS: LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY COMPULSORY PHARMACOTHERAPY..................................... 234 A. Privacy and Liberty Interests Implicated by Involuntary Pharamacotherapy.............................. 234 B. Informed Consent......................................................... 236 C. At Risk Targets for Coercive Pharmacotherapy ........................................................ 238 1. Pharmacotherapy and Public Education.............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Modulation of Immune Responses Using Adjuvants to Facilitate Therapeutic Vaccination
    Received: 6 March 2020 | Revised: 30 April 2020 | Accepted: 20 May 2020 DOI: 10.1111/imr.12889 INVITED REVIEW Modulation of immune responses using adjuvants to facilitate therapeutic vaccination Virgil Schijns1 | Alberto Fernández-Tejada2,3 | Žarko Barjaktarović4 | Ilias Bouzalas5 | Jens Brimnes6 | Sergey Chernysh7,† | Sveinbjorn Gizurarson8 | Ihsan Gursel9 | Žiga Jakopin10 | Maria Lawrenz11 | Cristina Nativi12 | Stephane Paul13 | Gabriel Kristian Pedersen14 | Camillo Rosano15 | Ane Ruiz-de-Angulo2 | Bram Slütter16 | Aneesh Thakur17 | Dennis Christensen14 | Ed C. Lavelle18 1Wageningen University, Cell Biology & Immunology and, ERC-The Netherlands, Schaijk, Landerd campus, The Netherlands 2Chemical Immunology Lab, Center for Cooperative Research in Biosciences, CIC bioGUNE, Biscay, Spain 3Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain 4Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro 5Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DEMETER, Veterinary Research Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece 6Alk Abello, Copenhagen, Denmark 7Laboratory of Insect Biopharmacology and Immunology, Department of Entomology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia 8Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland 9Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey 10Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 11Vaccine Formulation Institute (CH), Geneva, Switzerland 12Department of Chemistry, University of Florence, Florence, Italy 13St Etienne University, St Etienne, France 14Statens
    [Show full text]
  • Immunization Policies and Procedures Manual
    Immunization Policies and Procedures Manual Louisiana Department of Health Office of Public Health Immunization Program Revised September 2017 i Center for Community and Preventive Health Bureau of Infectious Diseases Immunization Program TABLE OF CONTENTS I. POLICY AND GENERAL CLINIC POLICY ............................................................................................................................. 1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 POLICY ON CLINIC SCHEDULING ............................................................................................................................................ 2 POLICY ON PUBLICITY FOR IMMUNIZATION ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................. 4 POLICY ON EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES (HEALTH EDUCATION IN IMMUNIZATION CLINICS) .......................... 5 POLICY ON CHECKING IMMUNIZATION STATUS OF ALL CHILDREN RECEIVING SERVICES THROUGH THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 POLICY ON MAXIMIZING TIME SPENT WITH PARENTS DURING IMMUNIZATION CLINICS ............................... 7 POLICY ON ASSISTANCE TO FOREIGN TRAVELERS .......................................................................................................... 9 II. POLICY
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF Immunization Roadmap 2018-2030
    UNICEF IMMUNIZATION ROADMAP 2018–2030 Cover: ©UNICEF/UN065768/Khouder Al-Issa A health worker vaccinates 3-year-old Rahaf in Tareek Albab neighborhood in the eastern part of Aleppo city. UNICEF IMMUNIZATION ROADMAP 2018–2030 Photograph credits: Pages vi-vii: © Shutterstock/thi Page 5: © UNICEF/UN060913/Al-Issa Page 6: © UNICEF/UNI41364/Estey Page 10: © UNICEF/UN061432/Dejongh Page 14: © UNICEF/UNI76541/Holmes Page 18: © UNICEF/UN0125829/Sharma Page 24: © UNICEF/UN059884/Zar Mon Page 26: © UNICEF/UN065770/Al-Issa Page 33: © UNICEF/UN0143438/Alhariri Page 34: © UNICEF/UNI45693/Estey Page 38: © UNICEF/UNI77040/Holmes Page 40: © UNICEF/UN0125861/Sharma Page 44: © UNICEF/UNI41211/Holmes © United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), September 2018 Permission is required to reproduce any part of this publication. Permission will be freely granted to educational or non-profit organizations. Please contact: Health Section, Immunization Team UNICEF 3 United Nations Plaza New York, NY 100017 Contents Abbreviations viii Executive summary 1 1. Introduction 7 1.1 Background 7 1.2 Developing the Roadmap 9 2. Key considerations informing the UNICEF Immunization Roadmap 11 2.1 Key drivers of immunization through 2030 11 2.2 Evolving immunization partnerships 15 2.3 UNICEF’s comparative advantage in immunization 16 3. What is new in this Roadmap? 19 3.1 Immunization coverage as a tracer indicator of child equity 19 3.2 Key areas of work 21 4. Roadmap programming framework 27 4.1 Vision and impact statements 27 4.2 Programming principles 27 4.3 Context-driven responses 27 4.4 Objectives and priorities 29 4.5 Populations and platforms 32 4.6 Country-level immunization strategies 32 5.
    [Show full text]
  • AAMC Standardized Immunization Form
    AAMC Standardized Immunization Form Middle Last Name: First Name: Initial: DOB: Street Address: Medical School: City: Cell Phone: State: Primary Email: ZIP Code: AAMC ID: MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) – 2 doses of MMR vaccine or two (2) doses of Measles, two (2) doses of Mumps and (1) dose of Rubella; or serologic proof of immunity for Measles, Mumps and/or Rubella. Choose only one option. Copy Note: a 3rd dose of MMR vaccine may be advised during regional outbreaks of measles or mumps if original MMR vaccination was received in childhood. Attached Option1 Vaccine Date MMR Dose #1 MMR -2 doses of MMR vaccine MMR Dose #2 Option 2 Vaccine or Test Date Measles Vaccine Dose #1 Serology Results Measles Qualitative -2 doses of vaccine or Measles Vaccine Dose #2 Titer Results: Positive Negative positive serology Quantitative Serologic Immunity (IgG antibody titer) Titer Results: _____ IU/ml Mumps Vaccine Dose #1 Serology Results Mumps Qualitative -2 doses of vaccine or Mumps Vaccine Dose #2 Titer Results: Positive Negative positive serology Quantitative Serologic Immunity (IgG antibody titer) Titer Results: _____ IU/ml Serology Results Rubella Qualitative Positive Negative -1 dose of vaccine or Rubella Vaccine Titer Results: positive serology Quantitative Serologic Immunity (IgG antibody titer) Titer Results: _____ IU/ml Tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis – 1 dose of adult Tdap; if last Tdap is more than 10 years old, provide date of last Td or Tdap booster Tdap Vaccine (Adacel, Boostrix, etc) Td Vaccine or Tdap Vaccine booster (if more than 10 years since last Tdap) Varicella (Chicken Pox) - 2 doses of varicella vaccine or positive serology Varicella Vaccine #1 Serology Results Qualitative Varicella Vaccine #2 Titer Results: Positive Negative Serologic Immunity (IgG antibody titer) Quantitative Titer Results: _____ IU/ml Influenza Vaccine --1 dose annually each fall Date Flu Vaccine © 2020 AAMC.
    [Show full text]
  • Hepatitis B Vaccine – Frequently Asked Questions (Information from the CDC)
    AAMC Standardized Immunization Form 2020 Hepatitis B Vaccine – Frequently Asked Questions (Information from the CDC) 1. What are the hepatitis B vaccines licensed for use in the United States? Three single-antigen vaccines and two combination vaccines are currently licensed in the United States. Single-antigen hepatitis B vaccines: • ENGERIX-B® • RECOMBIVAX HB® • HEPLISAV-B™ Combination vaccines: • PEDIARIX®: Combined hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (DTaP), and inactivated poliovirus (IPV) vaccine. Cannot be administered before age 6 weeks or after age 7 years. • TWINRIX®: Combined Hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccine. Recommended for people aged ≥18 years who are at increased risk for both HAV and HBV infections. 2. What are the recommended schedules for hepatitis B vaccination? The vaccination schedule most often used for children and adults is three doses given at 0, 1, and 6 months. Alternate schedules have been approved for certain vaccines and/or populations. A new formulation, Heplisav-B (HepB-CpG), is approved to be given as two doses one month apart. 3. If there is an interruption between doses of hepatitis B vaccine, does the vaccine series need to be restarted? No. The series does not need to be restarted but the following should be considered: • If the vaccine series was interrupted after the first dose, the second dose should be administered as soon as possible. • The second and third doses should be separated by an interval of at least 8 weeks. • If only the third dose is delayed, it should be administered as soon as possible. 4. Is it harmful to administer an extra dose of hepatitis B vaccine or to repeat the entire vaccine series if documentation of the vaccination history is unavailable or the serology test is negative? No, administering extra doses of single-antigen hepatitis B vaccine is not harmful.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule
    Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule UNITED STATES for ages 19 years or older 2021 Recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices How to use the adult immunization schedule (www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip) and approved by the Centers for Disease Determine recommended Assess need for additional Review vaccine types, Control and Prevention (www.cdc.gov), American College of Physicians 1 vaccinations by age 2 recommended vaccinations 3 frequencies, and intervals (www.acponline.org), American Academy of Family Physicians (www.aafp. (Table 1) by medical condition and and considerations for org), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (www.acog.org), other indications (Table 2) special situations (Notes) American College of Nurse-Midwives (www.midwife.org), and American Academy of Physician Assistants (www.aapa.org). Vaccines in the Adult Immunization Schedule* Report y Vaccines Abbreviations Trade names Suspected cases of reportable vaccine-preventable diseases or outbreaks to the local or state health department Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine Hib ActHIB® y Clinically significant postvaccination reactions to the Vaccine Adverse Event Hiberix® Reporting System at www.vaers.hhs.gov or 800-822-7967 PedvaxHIB® Hepatitis A vaccine HepA Havrix® Injury claims Vaqta® All vaccines included in the adult immunization schedule except pneumococcal 23-valent polysaccharide (PPSV23) and zoster (RZV) vaccines are covered by the Hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccine HepA-HepB Twinrix® Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Information on how to file a vaccine injury Hepatitis B vaccine HepB Engerix-B® claim is available at www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation. Recombivax HB® Heplisav-B® Questions or comments Contact www.cdc.gov/cdc-info or 800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636), in English or Human papillomavirus vaccine HPV Gardasil 9® Spanish, 8 a.m.–8 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Techniques and Talking Points to Address Vaccine Hesitancy
    Techniques and Talking Points to Address Vaccine Hesitancy Kristin Oliver, MD, MHS Assistant Professor Department of Environmental Medicine & Public Health Department of Pediatrics Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai I have no financial disclosures Worldwide prevent 2-3 million deaths every year. In US prevent 42,000 deaths per birth cohort. Discuss reasons for vaccine hesitancy. Answer the most common questions Objectives and concerns surrounding vaccines. Apply Motivational Interviewing (MI) strategies to address vaccine hesitancy. Most Parents Vaccinate Percent children age 24 months who received vaccinations, 2017 1.3% Percent Unvaccinated 1.4 1.3% 1.2 1 0.8 0.9% 0.6 0.4 0.2 98.7% 0 2011 2015 Percent Unvaccinated Unvaccinated Vaccinated Data source: Vaccination Coverage Among Children Aged 19–35 Months — United States, 2017. MMWR. v. 67, no. 40 ≥ 1 MMR Vaccination Coverage Among Children 19-35 Months 2017 Content source: National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-managers/coverage/childvaxview/data- reports/mmr/trend/index.html Heat Map of Select County Non-Medical Exemption Rates, 2016-2017 Olive JK, Hotez PJ, Damania A, Nolan MS (2018) The state of the antivaccine movement in the United States: A focused examination of nonmedical exemptions in states and counties. PLOS Medicine 15(6): e1002578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002578 https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002578 Parents Differ in Attitudes Towards Vaccination Data: Gust et al. Am J Behav. 2005;29(1): 81-92. Figure: Sanofi Pasteur 9/15 MKT30043 Will too many vaccines overwhelm the immune system? Common Questions From Vaccine Isn’t it better to space vaccines out? Hesitant Families Does MMR vaccine cause autism? (and their friends and neighbors and Are there harmful ingredients in strangers at vaccines? cocktail parties) Isn’t it better to get the natural infection? Source: Immunization Action Coalition.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-22 School Year New York State Immunization Requirements for School Entrance/Attendance1
    2021-22 School Year New York State Immunization Requirements for School Entrance/Attendance1 NOTES: Children in a prekindergarten setting should be age-appropriately immunized. The number of doses depends on the schedule recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Intervals between doses of vaccine should be in accordance with the ACIP-recommended immunization schedule for persons 0 through 18 years of age. Doses received before the minimum age or intervals are not valid and do not count toward the number of doses listed below. See footnotes for specific information foreach vaccine. Children who are enrolling in grade-less classes should meet the immunization requirements of the grades for which they are age equivalent. Dose requirements MUST be read with the footnotes of this schedule Prekindergarten Kindergarten and Grades Grades Grade Vaccines (Day Care, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 12 Head Start, and 11 Nursery or Pre-k) Diphtheria and Tetanus 5 doses toxoid-containing vaccine or 4 doses and Pertussis vaccine 4 doses if the 4th dose was received 3 doses (DTaP/DTP/Tdap/Td)2 at 4 years or older or 3 doses if 7 years or older and the series was started at 1 year or older Tetanus and Diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccine Not applicable 1 dose and Pertussis vaccine adolescent booster (Tdap)3 Polio vaccine (IPV/OPV)4 4 doses 3 doses or 3 doses if the 3rd dose was received at 4 years or older Measles, Mumps and 1 dose 2 doses Rubella vaccine (MMR)5 Hepatitis B vaccine6 3 doses 3 doses or 2 doses of adult hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax) for children who received the doses at least 4 months apart between the ages of 11 through 15 years Varicella (Chickenpox) 1 dose 2 doses vaccine7 Meningococcal conjugate Grades 2 doses vaccine (MenACWY)8 7, 8, 9, 10 or 1 dose Not applicable and 11: if the dose 1 dose was received at 16 years or older Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine 1 to 4 doses Not applicable (Hib)9 Pneumococcal Conjugate 1 to 4 doses Not applicable vaccine (PCV)10 Department of Health 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Vaccination Coverage Fact Sheet
    Improving Vaccination Coverage Fact Sheet Improving Vaccination Coverage for Vaccine-Preventable Diseases Public confidence in immunization is critical to sustaining and increasing vaccination coverage rates and preventing outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). There is some evidence suggesting vaccination requirements that have broad reach, limited exemption criteria, and strong enforcement may help promote higher rates of vaccination coverage along with complementary actions such as monitoring VPD cases, vaccination coverage, and exemption rates; and also reporting on recent VPD outbreaks. Importation of measles into the U.S. emphasizes the importance of sustaining and increasing vaccination coverage rates to prevent outbreaks of VPDs. Measles is a highly-contagious respiratory disease caused by a virus. It spreads through the air through coughing and sneezing. Measles starts with a fever, runny nose, cough, red eyes, and sore throat, and is followed by a rash that spreads all over the body. About three out of 10 people who get measles will develop one or more complications including pneumonia, ear infections, or diarrhea. Complications are more common in children younger than age 5 and adults. Measles cases and outbreaks still occur in countries in Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Pacific. Worldwide, about 20 million people get measles each year; about 146,000 die. Each year, unvaccinated people get infected while in other countries and bring the disease into the United States and spread it to others. Since 2000, when measles was declared eliminated from the U.S., the annual number of people reported to have measles ranged from a low of 37 people in 2004 to a high of 668 people in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • The GAVI Alliance
    GLOBAL PROGRAM REVIEW The GAVI Alliance Global Program Review The World Bank’s Partnership with the GAVI Alliance Main Report and Annexes Contents ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................. V ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................................ XI PROGRAM AT A GLANCE: THE GAVI ALLIANCE ............................................................................ XII KEY BANK STAFF RESPONSIBLE DURING PERIOD UNDER REVIEW ........................................ XIV GLOSSARY ......................................................................................................................................... XV OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................ XVII GAVI ALLIANCE MANAGEMENT RESPONSE .............................................................................. XXV WORLD BANK GROUP MANAGEMENT RESPONSE ................................................................... XXIX CHAIRPERSON’S SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... XXXI 1. THE WORLD BANK-GAVI PARTNERSHIP AND THE PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW ...................... 1 Evolution of GAVI .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]