Domestication and Early Agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: Origins, Diffusion, and Impact

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Domestication and Early Agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: Origins, Diffusion, and Impact PERSPECTIVE Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: Origins, diffusion, and impact Melinda A. Zeder* Archaeobiology Program, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013 Edited by Jeremy A. Sabloff, University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia, PA, and approved May 27, 2008 (received for review March 20, 2008) The past decade has witnessed a quantum leap in our understanding of the origins, diffusion, and impact of early agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin. In large measure these advances are attributable to new methods for documenting domestication in plants and animals. The initial steps toward plant and animal domestication in the Eastern Mediterranean can now be pushed back to the 12th millennium cal B.P. Evidence for herd management and crop cultivation appears at least 1,000 years earlier than the morphological changes traditionally used to document domestication. Different species seem to have been domesticated in different parts of the Fertile Crescent, with genetic analyses detecting multiple domestic lineages for each species. Recent evidence suggests that the ex- pansion of domesticates and agricultural economies across the Mediterranean was accomplished by several waves of seafaring colonists who established coastal farming enclaves around the Mediterranean Basin. This process also involved the adoption of do- mesticates and domestic technologies by indigenous populations and the local domestication of some endemic species. Human envi- ronmental impacts are seen in the complete replacement of endemic island faunas by imported mainland fauna and in today’s anthropogenic, but threatened, Mediterranean landscapes where sustainable agricultural practices have helped maintain high bio- diversity since the Neolithic. archaeology ͉ livestock he transition from foraging and fusion, and impacts of domesticates and therein). Rather than domestic status, hunting to farming and herding agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin, sex is the primary factor affecting body is a significant threshold in hu- outlining our current understanding of size in these ungulates, manifested by a man history. Domesticates and these developments and highlighting marked and consistent difference be- T tween larger males and smaller females the agricultural economies based on promising areas for future study. them are associated with radical restruc- in essentially all skeletal elements. Envi- turing of human societies, worldwide Initial Animal Domestication in the ronment also strongly influences body alterations in biodiversity, and signifi- Fertile Crescent size, with increasing heat and aridity cant changes in the Earth’s landforms Until the late 1990s archaeozoologists positively correlated with smaller size. and its atmosphere. Given the momen- relied on morphological changes in tar- What archaeozoologists had originally tous outcomes of this transition it comes get species to identify where and when interpreted as body size reduction asso- as little surprise that the origin and wild prey animals were transformed into ciated with initial domestication can now be attributed to differences in the spread of domesticates and the emer- herded livestock (2). A proposed sharp culling strategies of herders as opposed gence of agriculture remain topics of and rapid reduction in overall body size to hunters. In most prey species, hunters enduring interest to both the scholarly among archaeological prey populations focus on large adult animals (particu- community and the general public. was the most widely accepted morpho- larly males) to maximize return, and the The past decade has seen remarkable logical marker of this threshold (3, 4). bones of these larger animals generally analytical advances in documenting do- Based on this size reduction criterion, dominate in prey assemblages generated mestication (1), particularly in tracking the established consensus was that ani- by hunters. Archaeological assemblages the domestication of four major Near mal domestication (beginning with goats generated by herders, on the other Eastern livestock species (sheep, goats, and then sheep) occurred at ca. 10,000– hand, are usually dominated by the cattle, and pigs) and their subsequent 9,500 B.P.†, Ϸ1,000 years after the bones of smaller females slaughtered dispersal throughout the Mediterranean domestication of crop plants in the after their prime reproductive years. Ex- Basin. New morphometric methods are southern Levant (3, 5). Domestication of cess males not needed for herd propaga- tracking changes in human prey strate- these two animal species was thought to tion were harvested at young ages and gies that mark the transition from hunt- have occurred somewhere to the north their more friable bones are usually less ing to herding. Genetic analyses bring and east of the heartland of plant do- well represented in these assemblages. fresh insights into initial livestock mestication (5), although a second, inde- Although the linkage between domes- domestication and their dispersal. Small- pendent domestication of goats was tication and body size was called into sample atomic mass spectrometry proposed for the southern Levant (6). radiocarbon dating provides refined The utility of this size reduction chronological frameworks for these de- marker, and indeed of all morphological This article grew out of a presentation given by M.Z. at the Calpe 2007 Symposium: People in the Mediterranean–A velopments. These recent analytical markers, has come under increasing History of Interaction, September 27–30, 2007, the Gibraltar advances, in turn, have produced an ex- scrutiny (7). My own work on both mod- Museum, Gibraltar. plosion of new information that is call- ern skeletal collections and archaeologi- Author contributions: M.A.Z. designed research, per- ing into question prevailing hypotheses cal caprine (sheep and goat) remains formed research, synthesized research in referenced publi- about the origin and early spread of ani- from the Near East finds little support cations, and wrote the paper. mal domesticates and the Neolithic life- for the almost axiomatic acceptance that The author declares no conflict of interest. ways of which they were a part. Here, I domestication results in an automatic This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. bring together these different sources of overall reduction in body size in man- *E-mail: [email protected]. information to consider the origins, dif- aged animals (ref. 8 and references †All dates are reported in calibrated years before present. www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.0801317105 PNAS ͉ August 19, 2008 ͉ vol. 105 ͉ no. 33 ͉ 11597–11604 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 question by this research, the marked degree of sexual dimorphism in caprines it documented offered another approach to tracking the transition from hunting PIGS SHEEP to herding. Pronounced differences in 10,000 10,500 the size of male and female skeletal 10,000 11,000 8,500 CATTLE GOATS 10,000 elements make it possible to separate 8,500 11,000 archaeological assemblages into 9,600 9,000 sex-specific subpopulations, which, based 10,500 10,500 on a refined understanding of the se- 10,500 10,500 10,000 quence and timing of long bone fusion 9,000 (9), can be used to generate high- 9,600 9,500 resolution harvest profiles for male and 9,000 8,500 female animals capable of distinguishing 8,500 8,500 the prey strategies of hunters from the 8,500 harvest strategies of herders. Application of this approach to ar- chaeological assemblages from Iraq and Fig. 1. The origin and dispersal of domestic livestock species in the Fertile Crescent. Shaded areas show Iran has identified the clear signature of the general region and the approximate dates in calibrated years B.P. in which initial domestication is a managed herd of goats (harvesting of thought to take place. Dates outside of the shaded areas show the approximate date when the domes- young males and prolonged survivorship ticate first appears in a region. Orange, goats (Capra hircus); blue, sheep (Ovis aries); green, cattle (Bos of females) at the site of Ganj Dareh in taurus); fuscia, pigs (Sus scrofa). highland Iran (8). Directly dated to 9,900 B.P., the goats from this site show no evidence of size reduction or any elsewhere in the Fertile Crescent are slower, to that of sheep (Fig. 1) (10, 14). other domestication-induced morpholog- detecting parallel patterns to those doc- Morphologically altered domestic pigs ical change. Smaller body size and umented in the Zagros. Changes in the are not found in the southern Levant or changes in the size and shape of horns age of harvested caprines, and possibly lowland Iran until ca. 8,500–8,000 B.P. [a morphological change clearly linked demographically driven changes in size Recent demographic evidence suggests to domestication (2)] appear 500–1,000 consistent with early herd management, that taurine cattle were initially domesti- years later than this demographic shift, are found in southeastern Anatolia at cated somewhere in the upper Eu- when managed animals were moved ca. 10,500 B.P. (12). Sheep seem to be phrates Valley between ca. 11,000 and from the natural habitat of wild goats the initial early focus of the transition 10,000 B.P. (15), but, like sheep and and introduced into hotter and more from hunting to herding in this region, pigs, they arrived relatively late in more arid lowland Iran. These follow-on mor- with managed goats arriving from out- distant parts of the Fertile Crescent phological changes likely reflect re- side the area at ca. 10,200 B.P. (12). (Fig. 1). Morphologically altered domes- sponses to new selective pressures, plus Similarly, demographic evidence for the tic pigs and cattle are not found in Cen- the now more limited opportunities for management of morphologically unal- tral Anatolia until after 8,500 B.P. (16). introgression between managed and wild tered caprines (mostly sheep) is found in Genetic data from modern and ar- animals or the restocking of herds with Central Anatolia between 10,400 and chaeological specimens both support wild animals. 9,400 B.P.
Recommended publications
  • Interpreting Diachronic Size Variation in Prehistoric Central Asian Cereal Grains
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 29 April 2021 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.633634 Interpreting Diachronic Size Variation in Prehistoric Central Asian Cereal Grains Giedre Motuzaite Matuzeviciute 1, Basira Mir-Makhamad 1,2* and Robert N. Spengler III 2 1 Department of Archaeology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania, 2 Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany The morphology of ancient cereal grains in Central Asia has been heavily discussed as an indicator of specific genetic variants, which are often linked to cultural factors or distinct routes of dispersal. In this paper, we present the largest currently existing database of barley (n = 631) and wheat (n = 349) measurements from Central Asia, obtained from two different periods at the Chap site (ca. 3,500 to 1,000 BC), located in the Tien Shan Mountains of Kyrgyzstan at 2,000 masl. The site is situated at the highest elevation ecocline for successful cereal cultivation and is, therefore, highly susceptible to minor climatic fluctuations that could force gradients up or down in the foothills. We contrast the Chap data with measurements from other second and first millennia BC sites in Edited by: the region. An evident increase in average size over time is likely due to the evolution Gianluca Piovesan, of larger grains or the introduction of larger variants from elsewhere. Additionally, site- or University of Tuscia, Italy region-specific variation is noted, and we discuss potential influences for the formation of Reviewed by: Anna Maria Mercuri, genetic varieties, including possible pleiotropic linkages and/or developmental responses University of Modena and Reggio to external factors, such as environmental fluctuations, climate, irrigation inputs, soil Emilia, Italy Mark Nesbitt, nutrients, pathologies, and seasonality.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Institution Archives (SIA)
    SMITHSONIAN OPPORTUNITIES FOR RESEARCH AND STUDY 2020 Office of Fellowships and Internships Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC The Smithsonian Opportunities for Research and Study Guide Can be Found Online at http://www.smithsonianofi.com/sors-introduction/ Version 2.0 (Updated January 2020) Copyright © 2020 by Smithsonian Institution Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 How to Use This Book .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Anacostia Community Museum (ACM) ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Archives of American Art (AAA) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Asian Pacific American Center (APAC) .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage (CFCH) ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Cooper-Hewitt,
    [Show full text]
  • “Fertile Crescent” Will Disappear in This Century
    Hydrological Research Letters 2,1‒4 (2008) Published online in J-STAGE (www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/HRL). DOI: 10.3178/HRL.2.1 First super-high-resolution model projection that the ancient “Fertile Crescent” will disappear in this century Akio Kitoh1, Akiyo Yatagai2 and Pinhas Alpert3 1Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan 2Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan 3Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel demand (Vorosmarty et al., 2000). Water in the environ- Abstract: ment is an international problem because it is strongly related with the import and export of agricultural and The first full projections of rainfall and streamflow industrial products and the economic and social well- in the “Fertile Crescent” of Middle East are presented being. Multi-model climate change simulations for the in this paper. Up until now, this has not been possible 21st century showed a decrease in runoff in the Middle due to the lack of observed data and the lack of atmos- East of up to 30% by 2050 (Milly et al., 2005). A 40% pheric models with sufficient resolution. An innovative decrease in the annual streamflow of the Euphrates super-high-resolution (20-km) global climate model is River has also been projected (Nohara et al., 2006). employed, which accurately reproduces the precipita- However, the horizontal resolution of the climate tion and the streamflow of the present-day Fertile models used for these projections (between 400 km and Crescent. It is projected that, by the end of this century, 125 km) is not sufficient to resolve the topography in the Fertile Crescent will lose its current shape and may the Fertile Crescent.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Anatolia Contribute to the Neolithization of Southeast Europe?*
    Colloquium Anatolicum IV 2005 17-41 Did Anatolia contribute to the Neolithization of Southeast Europe?* Jak Yakar In the Near East, the process of “Neolithization” highlighted by sedenta- rization or semi-sedentarization could be defined as a slow socio-economic course that evolved parallel to the climatic amelioration with milder temper- atures and increased humidity during the early Holocene. Climatic changes having a certain impact on the local flora would have affected the composi- tion of the local fauna. Shifting migration patterns and feeding zones of animal species hunted for their meat due to environmental changes no doubt neces- sitated certain economic adaptations requiring lesser or more selective mobil- ity on the part of hunter-gatherer communities. Recognizing the archaeologi- cal implications of social changes during the process of sedentarization is a difficult task, in most instances attainable only by way of an interdisciplinary approach. In Anatolia, the chronological sequence of this process indicates an early start in the southeast, gradually spreading to areas of grassland vege- tation in the southern Anatolian plateau. It subsequently reached the Aegean coast and slightly later spread to the more northerly regions of western Anatolia. The question is did the spread of this so-called “Neolithization” involve human agents from a specific geographic source area? Most scholars answer this question in the affirmative despite the fact that ethno-culturally the Neo- lithic society of Anatolia was not a homogenous entity. The society in this sub-continent characterized by its geographical diversity was equally divers ethno-culturally; in certain peripheral habitats having more in common with the prehistoric inhabitants of neighboring lands (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Economies in Pre-Hispanic Southern Mexico 155
    The The Recognition of the role of animals in ancient diet, economy, politics, and ritual is vital to understanding ancient cultures fully, while following the clues available from Archaeobiology 1 animal remains in reconstructing environments is vital to understanding the ancient relationship between humans and the world around them. In response to the growing interest in the field of zooarchaeology, this volume presents current research from across the many cultures and regions of Mesoamerica, dealing specifically with the Archaeology most current issues in zooarchaeological literature. Geographically, the essays collected here index the The Archaeology of different aspects of animal use by the indigenous populations of the entire area between the northern borders of Mexico and the southern borders of lower Central America. This includes such diverse cultures as the Olmec, Maya, Zapotec, Mixtec, and Central American Indians. The time frame of the volume extends from the Preclassic to recent times. The book’s chapters, written by experts in the field of Mesoamerican Mesoamerican Animals of Mesoamerican zooarchaeology, provide important general background on the domestic and ritual use of animals in early and classic Mesoamerica and Central America, but deal also with special aspects of human–animal relationships such as early domestication and symbolism of animals, and important yet edited by Christopher M. Götz and Kitty F. Emery otherwise poorly represented aspects of taphonomy and zooarchaeological methodology. Christopher M. Götz is Profesor-Investigador (lecturer & researcher), Facultad de Ciencias Antropológicas, UADY, Mexico. Kitty F. Emery is Associate Curator of Environmental Archaeology, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, USA. Animals “A must for those interested in the interaction of human and animals in Mesoamerica or elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE (September 2011)
    CURRICULUM VITAE (September 2011) David William Steadman Present Positions and Address: Curator of Ornithology; Associate Director for Collections and Research Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, P. O. Box 117800, Gainesville, FL 32611. Telephone (352) 273-1969; Fax (352) 846-0287; E-mail, [email protected] Primary Research Interests: Ornithology, zooarchaeology, and vertebrate paleontology of tropical and subtropical regions. Extinction, systematics, and historic biogeography of birds on Caribbean and Pacific islands. Paleontology, biogeography, evolution, and community ecology of New World landbirds. Education: Ph.D. Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1982 M.S. Zoology, University of Florida, 1975 B.S. Biology, Edinboro State College, 1973 Recent Employment History: August 2001 – June 2004, August 2007 – present: Assistant/Associate Director for Collections and Research, Florida Museum of Natural History March 2000 – February 2003: University of Florida Research Foundation Professor August 1995 – present: Assistant/Associate/Full Curator of Ornithology, Florida Museum of Natural History February 1985 – July 1995: Associate and Senior Scientist (Zoology), and Curator of Vertebrates, New York State Museum Research Grants: August 2011 (ongoing) Collaborative Research: Long-term Dynamics and Resilience of Terrrestrial Plant and Animal Communities in the Bahamas. National Science Foundation (J. Franklin, DWS, P.L. Fall; total award $414,000; UF portion $164,573). August 2011 (ongoing) U.S.-Peru Planning Visit: Planning a Collaborative Program of Vertebrate Paleontology in Northwestern Peru. $21,296. National Science Foundation. November 2009 (ongoing) Logistical and Intellectual Foundation for Teaching Field Courses in the Bahamas and Turks & Caicos Islands. $22,168. Faculty Enhancement Opportunity Award, Provost’s Office, University of Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution
    On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bar-Yosef, Ofer. 1998. “On the Nature of Transitions: The Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution.” Cam. Arch. Jnl 8 (02) (October): 141. Published Version doi:10.1017/S0959774300000986 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12211496 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Cambridge Archaeological Journal 8:2 (1998), 141-63 On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution Ofer Bar-Yosef This article discusses two major revolutions in the history of humankind, namely, the Neolithic and the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic revolutions. The course of the first one is used as a general analogy to study the second, and the older one. This approach puts aside the issue of biological differences among the human fossils, and concentrates solely on the cultural and technological innovations. It also demonstrates that issues that are common- place to the study of the trajisition from foraging to cultivation and animal husbandry can be employed as an overarching model for the study of the transition from the Middle to the Upper Palaeolithic. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the core areas where each of these revolutions began, the ensuing dispersals and their geographic contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Geobio-Center LMU Report 2014 / 2015
    GeoBio-Center LMU LMU ReportGeoBio-Center 2014 / 2015 Report 2012 / 2013 GeoBio-CenterLMU Report 2014 / 2015 Editor: Dirk Erpenbeck, Angelo Poliseno Layout: Lydia Geißler Cover composition: Lydia Geißler GeoBio-Center LMU, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, 80333 München http://www.geobio-center.uni-muenchen.de Contents Welcoming note ......................................................................................................................4 Achievements of the GeoBio-Center LMU members 2014 & 2015 at a glance ......................5 Members of the GeoBio-CenterLMU ........................................................................................6 Memorial to Alexander Volker Altenbach (1953-2015) ..........................................................9 Publications in ISI-indexed Journals ...................................................................................14 Other peer-reviewed Publications .......................................................................................21 Further Publications .............................................................................................................23 Grants and Stipends ............................................................................................................26 Honors and Awards ..............................................................................................................27 Presentations on Conferences and Symposia ....................................................................28 Teaching ................................................................................................................................35
    [Show full text]
  • Carpals and Tarsals of Mule Deer, Black Bear and Human: an Osteology Guide for the Archaeologist
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship 2009 Carpals and tarsals of mule deer, black bear and human: an osteology guide for the archaeologist Tamela S. Smart Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Smart, Tamela S., "Carpals and tarsals of mule deer, black bear and human: an osteology guide for the archaeologist" (2009). WWU Graduate School Collection. 19. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/19 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MASTER'S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master's degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non-exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWu. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others. I warrant that I have obtained written permissions from the owner of any third party copyrighted material included in these files. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of this work, including but not limited to the right to use all or part of this work in future works, such as articles or books.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete List of All Branches of Biology for SSC & Banking Exams
    Complete List of All Branches of Biology for SSC & Banking Exams- GK Notes in PDF! One can get confused when it comes to knowing about Biology and its branches. Get the complete list of Branches of Biology in this article. Many questions are asked based on Biology Branches in SSC & Banking Exams. Score more marks in your exam and boost your exam preparation with this list. Keep reading on to know brief definition about each of the Branches in Biology. Branches of Biology - Introduction Biology comes from the Greek word "bios" meaning life and "logos" meaning study. Biology is the science that studies about various living organisms. A living organism could be a one-celled bacteria or a several-celled organism such as an animal or a plant. Biological science is classified into various branches, depending upon the organisms to be studied, and is a vast field. It is composed of many branches through which the scope of biology is broadened with the unifying concepts that govern all study and research which is consolidated into a single and coherent field. Complete List of Branches of Biology Here is the Complete List of Specific branches of Biology that is useful to understand the various phenomena’s related to life and important for examinations perspective also like SSC, UPSC, State Services, and NDA etc. 1 | P a g e Branches of Definition Biology Agrostology It is the scientific study of the grasses Agrology Soil science dealing especially with production of the crop Agronomy Science of soil management and production of the crop Allometry Study of the relationship of body size to shape, anatomy, physiology and finally behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating Revolutions: Early Farmers May Have Sown Social Upheavals from the Middle East to Europe Bruce Bower Science News
    Cultivating revolutions: early farmers may have sown social upheavals from the Middle East to Europe Bruce Bower Science News. 167.6 (Feb. 5, 2005): p88. From General OneFile. ​ ​ ​ Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2005 Science Service, Inc. http://www.sciencenews.org Full Text: Nearly 80 years ago, the British archaeologist V. Gordon Childe championed a theory of what he called a revolution in food production during the Neolithic age. Childe proposed that hunting-and-gathering groups in the Middle East had been the first people to grow crops, raise animals for food, and live year-round in villages--around 10,000 years ago. In his scenario, farmers then spread into prehistoric Europe, where they spurred the equally revolutionary rise of modern civilization. Childe's ideas triggered a scientific squabble over the roots of agriculture that has produced two polarized camps. Childe-friendly researchers hold that expanding populations of Middle Eastern farmers moved across Europe and replaced hunter-gatherers already living there. This massive migration is often portrayed ,as a wave of advance, in which farming populations inexorably annexed new chunks of land at a rate of about I kilometer annually as they cut a path northwest through Europe. In the process, they overwhelmed any hunter-gatherers who happened to be in their way. A contrasting approach, which has arisen over the past 20 years, pegs the Neolithic transition to a movement largely of ideas, not people. In this scenario, European hunter-gatherers slowly adopted agricultural practices on their own or after brief encounters with encroaching Middle Eastern farmers. Thus, over millennia, the Europeans picked up farming techniques as they continued their nomadic ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics and Animal Domestication: New Windows on an Elusive Process K
    Journal of Zoology. Print ISSN 0952-8369 Genetics and animal domestication: new windows on an elusive process K. Dobney1 & G. Larson2 1 Department of Archaeology, University of Durham, Durham, UK 2 Department of Zoology, Henry Wellcome Ancient Biomolecules Centre, University of Oxford, UK Keywords Abstract domestication; genetics; phylogeography; molecular clocks; paedomorphosis. Domesticated animals are universally familiar. How, when, where and why they became domesticated is less well understood. The genetic revolution of the past few Correspondence decades has facilitated novel insights into a field that previously was principally the Greger Larson, Department of Zoology, domain of archaeozoologists. Although some of the conclusions drawn from Henry Wellcome Ancient Biomolecules genetic data have proved to be contentious, many studies have significantly altered Centre, University of Oxford, South Parks or refined our understanding of past human animal relationships. This review Road OX1 3PS, UK seeks not only to discuss the wider concerns and ramifications of genetic Email: [email protected] approaches to the study of animal domestication but also to provide a broader theoretical framework for understanding the process itself. More specifically, we Received 6 July 2005; accepted 8 September discuss issues related to the terminology associated with domestication, the 2005 possibility of domestication genes, and the promise and problems of genetics to answer the fundamental questions associated with domestication. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00042.x Introduction Defining domestication Over the past 10 000 years, human history has been wholly Terminology typically used in domestication studies, including transformed by the domestication of plants and animals. the word ‘domestication’ itself, is often confusing and poorly Although the term ‘domestic animal’ has universal meaning, defined.
    [Show full text]