President Picks Pro-Gay Republican National Chairman Gay Rights Groups Praise Selection of Ex-Gov

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

President Picks Pro-Gay Republican National Chairman Gay Rights Groups Praise Selection of Ex-Gov President Picks Pro-Gay Republican National Chairman Gay Rights Groups Praise Selection of Ex-Gov. Racicot By Ron Gunzburger forced the state GOP to publicly apologize President George W. Bush won praise for the attempted legislation. Because of from gay rights organizations for his term-limits, Racicot was ineligible to seek re- selection December 5 of former Montana election in 2000. Governor Marc Racicot as the new During the Florida recount, Racicot Republican National Committee Chairman. played a prominent role as a Bush campaign Racicot (pronounced spokesman. He also was the Roscoe), a soft-spoken initial frontrunner to become political centrist, has a Bush’s Attorney General. solid pro-gay record However, fierce opposition dating back many years. from Religious Right groups “This appointment forced Racicot to voluntarily hopefully signals that the withdraw his name from GOP is moving in a more consideration. moderate direction that Georgia Republican State will embrace all Chairman Ralph Reed — the Americans,” said Winnie former Executive Director of Stachelberg, Political the Christian Coalition — told Marc Director of the Human The New York Times he Racicot Rights Campaign. “hoped that Racicot’s fierce “Racicot has a strong loyalty to President Bush” record of inclusion and has a history of and “the fact that he would not be in the supporting and respecting people regardless Cabinet setting government policy” would of sexual orientation.” satisfy the Religious Right community. Racicot was first elected governor in Gay Republican, not surprisingly, held 1992 and was re-elected in 1996 with over 80 a more enthusiastic view. “Governor Racicot percent of the vote. While in office, Racicot is the right man at the right time for the GOP. enacted a state employee non-discrimination He understands that inclusion wins for the policy that included sexual orientation. He Republican Party,” said Rich Tafel, Executive also was a proponent of an unsuccessful Director of Log Cabin Republicans. 1993 attempt to repeal the state’s sodomy Racicot, who now works in Washington law. That action earned Racicot strong as a lawyer-lobbyist, will replace outgoing criticism from the Christian Coalition. RNC Chairman Jim Gilmore in January. Racicot also fought against a Religious Gilmore, an anti-gay conservative, resigned Right effort in 1995 to add gay people to the in the aftermath of the GOP’s disappointing state’s sexual offenders registry. He later losses in the 2001 gubernatorial elections. www.ExpressGayNews.com • December 17th, 2001 11 CYMK.
Recommended publications
  • Matt Rosendale/Nrsc – Choice Fact Check
    MATT ROSENDALE/NRSC – CHOICE FACT CHECK OVERVIEW • Jon Tester, as Ranking Member of the Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee, has been a leader in working with the Trump Administration to secure our borders, and has fought tirelessly throughout his career to put more boots on the ground and deploy technology to secure the Northern and Southern borders. • Matt Rosendale has repeatedly opposed efforts to keep Montanans safe – he was called out by the Billings Gazette for being one of only seven state senators to vote against legislation to toughen penalties for human trafficking, voted against creating a permanent sexual assault prosecution office in the Montana Department of Justice, and voted against funding a service to notify victims or sex crimes when their attacker was released from prison. • Matt Rosendale is a multimillionaire East Cost real estate developer who moved to Montana after buying a $2 million trophy ranch that he doesn’t even ranch himself; he’s a political opportunist who has run for 5 offices in 8 years and who started his campaign with a “pants on fire” lie about Jon Tester’s record. Rosendale was hand- picked by Washington insiders and special interests; his campaign has been propped up by millions in dark money outside spending – he’ll do their bidding, not what’s best for Montana. CLAIM FACTS V/O: There's a JON TESTER HAS BEEN A LEADER IN EFFORTS TO WORK WITH THE TRUMP choice on ADMINISTRATION TO STRENGTHEN OUR BORDER SECURITY immigration. HEADLINE: “Tester Joins Bipartisan Group Working On Border Security Deal.” [MTPR, ON SCREEN: 1/24/18] THERE IS A CHOICE ON CNN: Jon Tester “Was One Of A Handful” Of Senators To Meet With Trump IMMIGRATION Administration Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen On Immigration Reform Negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field
    Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters AREA N= 600 100% DC Area ........................................ 1 ( 1/ 98) 164 27% West ........................................... 2 51 9% Piedmont Valley ................................ 3 134 22% Richmond South ................................. 4 104 17% East ........................................... 5 147 25% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. We are calling Virginia households statewide. Would you be willing to spend three minutes answering some brief questions? <ROTATE> or someone in that household). N= 600 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/105) 600 100% GEND RECORD GENDER N= 600 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/106) 275 46% Female ......................................... 2 325 54% S2 S2. Thank You. How likely are you to vote in the Presidential Election on November 4th? N= 600 100% Very likely .................................... 1 ( 1/107) 583 97% Somewhat likely ................................ 2 17 3% Not very/Not at all likely ..................... 3 0 0% Other/Undecided/Refused ........................ 4 0 0% Q1 Q1. Which political party do you feel closest to - Democrat, Republican, or Independent? N= 600 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/110) 269 45% Republican ..................................... 2 188 31% Independent/Unaffiliated/Other ................. 3 141 24% Not registered
    [Show full text]
  • Www. George Wbush.Com
    Post Office Box 10648 Arlington, VA 2221 0 Phone. 703-647-2700 Fax: 703-647-2993 www. George WBush.com October 27,2004 , . a VIA FACSIMILE (202-219-3923) AND CERTIFIED MAIL == c3 F Federal Election Commission 999 E Street NW Washington, DC 20463 b ATTN: Office of General Counsel e r\, Re: MUR3525 Dear Federal Election Commission: On behalf of President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard B. Cheney as candidates for federal office, Karl Rove, David Herndon and Bush-Cheney ’04, Inc., this letter responds to the allegations contained in the complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission (the “Commission”) by Kerry-Edwards 2004, Inc. The Kerry Campaign’s complaint alleges that Bush-Cheney 2004 and fourteen other individuals and organizations violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 197 1, as amended (2 U.S.C. $ 431 et seq.) (“the Act”). Specifically, the Kerry Campaign alleges that individuals and organizations named in the complaint illegally coordinated with one another to produce and air advertising about Senator. Kerry’s military service. 1 Considering that no entity by the name of Bush-Cheney 2004 appears to exist, 1’ Bush-Cheney ’04, Inc. (“Bush Campaign”) presumes that the Kerry Campaign mistakenly filed its complaint against a non-existent entity and actually intended to file against the Bush Campaign. Assuming that the foregoing presumption is correct; the Bush Campaign, on behalf of itself and President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Karl Rove, David Herndon (the “Parties”), responds as follows: Response to Allegations Against President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christian Coalition in the Life Cycle of the Religious Right
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1997 Defying the odds: The Christian Coalition in the life cycle of the Religious Right Kathleen S Espin University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Espin, Kathleen S, "Defying the odds: The Christian Coalition in the life cycle of the Religious Right" (1997). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 3321. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/CQHQ-ABU5 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text direct^ from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter fiic^ udnle others may be fix>m any type o f computer printer. The qnalityr of this reproduction is dependent npon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversety afikct reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Defense and Homeland Security: a Short History of National Preparedness Efforts
    Civil Defense and Homeland Security: A Short History of National Preparedness Efforts September 2006 Homeland Security National Preparedness Task Force 1 Civil Defense and Homeland Security: A Short History of National Preparedness Efforts September 2006 Homeland Security National Preparedness Task Force 2 ABOUT THIS REPORT This report is the result of a requirement by the Director of the Department of Homeland Security’s National Preparedness Task Force to examine the history of national preparedness efforts in the United States. The report provides a concise and accessible historical overview of U.S. national preparedness efforts since World War I, identifying and analyzing key policy efforts, drivers of change, and lessons learned. While the report provides much critical information, it is not meant to be a substitute for more comprehensive historical and analytical treatments. It is hoped that the report will be an informative and useful resource for policymakers, those individuals interested in the history of what is today known as homeland security, and homeland security stakeholders responsible for the development and implementation of effective national preparedness policies and programs. 3 Introduction the Nation’s diverse communities, be carefully planned, capable of quickly providing From the air raid warning and plane spotting pertinent information to the populace about activities of the Office of Civil Defense in the imminent threats, and able to convey risk 1940s, to the Duck and Cover film strips and without creating unnecessary alarm. backyard shelters of the 1950s, to today’s all- hazards preparedness programs led by the The following narrative identifies some of the Department of Homeland Security, Federal key trends, drivers of change, and lessons strategies to enhance the nation’s learned in the history of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • **** This Is an EXTERNAL Email. Exercise Caution. DO NOT Open Attachments Or Click Links from Unknown Senders Or Unexpected Email
    Scott.A.Milkey From: Hudson, MK <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 3:23 PM To: Powell, David N;Landis, Larry (llandis@ );candacebacker@ ;Miller, Daniel R;Cozad, Sara;McCaffrey, Steve;Moore, Kevin B;[email protected];Mason, Derrick;Creason, Steve;Light, Matt ([email protected]);Steuerwald, Greg;Trent Glass;Brady, Linda;Murtaugh, David;Seigel, Jane;Lanham, Julie (COA);Lemmon, Bruce;Spitzer, Mark;Cunningham, Chris;McCoy, Cindy;[email protected];Weber, Jennifer;Bauer, Jenny;Goodman, Michelle;Bergacs, Jamie;Hensley, Angie;Long, Chad;Haver, Diane;Thompson, Lisa;Williams, Dave;Chad Lewis;[email protected];Andrew Cullen;David, Steven;Knox, Sandy;Luce, Steve;Karns, Allison;Hill, John (GOV);Mimi Carter;Smith, Connie S;Hensley, Angie;Mains, Diane;Dolan, Kathryn Subject: Indiana EBDM - June 22, 2016 Meeting Agenda Attachments: June 22, 2016 Agenda.docx; Indiana Collaborates to Improve Its Justice System.docx **** This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. **** Dear Indiana EBDM team members – A reminder that the Indiana EBDM Policy Team is scheduled to meet this Wednesday, June 22 from 9:00 am – 4:00 pm at IJC. At your earliest convenience, please let me know if you plan to attend the meeting. Attached is the meeting agenda. Please note that we have a full agenda as this is the team’s final Phase V meeting. We have much to discuss as we prepare the state’s application for Phase VI. We will serve box lunches at about noon so we can make the most of our time together.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Aviation Awareness Art Contest Winners
    MDT - Department of Transportation Aeronautics Divsion Vol. 51 No. 6 June 2000 2000 Aviation AwarenessP Art Contest Winners Once again our office received a great number of high quality entries for our Aviation Awareness Art contest. This years winners are Brent Bouma of Lin- coln, MT - grades 9-12 category, Crys- tal Dorne, Swan Lake, MT grades 5- 8 category and Ray Martin, Cut Bank, MT in the grades 1-4 category. Con- test winners along with their parents were flown to Helena on May 8, 2000 and presented with a trophy and plaque from Governor Marc Racicot, follow- ing the ceremony all were treated to lunch and a tour of the Helena Regional Airport before returning home. As the grand prize winner, Brent will be at- tending the annual Experimental Air- Pictured above winners Ray, Brent, Crystal and Samantha receive their awards from craft Association (EAA) Air Academy Governor Marc Racicot and Mike Ferguson from July 19-28, 2000 at Oshkosh, WI. This years 2nd and 3rd place winners are as follows: Category I Grades 1-4 2nd Brittany Yother, Helena, MT 3rd Patrick DeNitto, Florence, MT Category II Grades 5-8 2nd Samantha Dorne, Swan Lake, MT 3rd Kristy Sparks, Laurel, MT Category III Grades 9-12 2nd Morgan Kinney, Florence, MT 3rd Nellie Ballou, Helena, MT Our Congratulations goes out to all of Above Brent recieves his ribbon from Governor Racicot. Brents trip to the winners for the time and dedication they Oshkosh would not be possible without the generous donations from Montanas put into their artwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Committees" and Abide by Soft Men and Women He Served with in Money Restrictions
    Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Volume 7 Issue 3 Issue 3 - Summer 2005 Article 6 2005 Bring it On: The High-Stakes Battle Over Whether the Courts, Congress or the FEC Should Muzzle Independent "527" Television Advertising Christopher G. Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw Part of the Communications Law Commons, Election Law Commons, and the Marketing Law Commons Recommended Citation Christopher G. Johnson, Bring it On: The High-Stakes Battle Over Whether the Courts, Congress or the FEC Should Muzzle Independent "527" Television Advertising, 7 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 485 (2020) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/vol7/iss3/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The High- 'akes Battle Over Whether the Courts, Congress or the FEC Should Muzzle Independent "527" Television Advertising [ By Christopher G. lohnson*i ohn Kerry lied to get his Bronze Those who closely followed the 2004 Star. I know, I was there-I saw presidential election are familiar with the what happened."1 firestorm surrounding these controversial tele- "George Bush misled us vision ads. Last year's political advertising 2 into war with Iraq." brouhaha set the stage for the current, no- "John Kerry secretly met holds-barred battle over whether organiza- with enemy leaders in Paris- tions claiming tax exempt status under 26 though we were still at war."3 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economist/Yougov Poll
    The Economist/YouGov Poll Sample 2000 General Population Respondents Conducted July 31 - August 4, 2015 Margin of Error ±2.9% 1. Some people seem to follow what’s going on in government and public affairs most of the time, whether there’s an election going on or not. Others aren’t that interested. Would you say you follow what’s going on in government and public affairs ... ? Most of the time . 45% Some of the time . 32% Only now and then . .13% Hardly at all . 9% Don’t know . .1% 2. Would you say things in this country today are... Generally headed in the right direction . 30% Off on the wrong track . 56% Not sure . 14% 3. Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people? Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t favorable favorable unfavorable unfavorable know Joe Biden 14% 27% 15% 26% 17% Lincoln Chafee 2% 10% 12% 14% 62% Hillary Clinton 21% 23% 10% 39% 7% Martin O’Malley 3% 13% 14% 14% 56% Bernie Sanders 15% 15% 14% 21% 36% Jim Webb 3% 13% 14% 11% 58% 1 The Economist/YouGov Poll 4. Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people? Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t favorable favorable unfavorable unfavorable know Jeb Bush 9% 25% 21% 28% 17% Ben Carson 14% 18% 12% 16% 40% Chris Christie 6% 22% 24% 27% 22% Ted Cruz 11% 20% 14% 26% 29% Carly Fiorina 9% 16% 12% 17% 45% Jim Gilmore 3% 8% 11% 12% 66% Lindsey Graham 4% 16% 19% 22% 39% Mike Huckabee 9% 22% 18% 25% 26% Bobby Jindal 7% 18% 14% 21% 40% John Kasich 6% 14% 13% 13% 53% George Pataki 2% 14% 17% 15% 52% Rand Paul 8% 26% 20% 19% 28% Rick Perry 7% 23% 15% 25% 30% Marco Rubio 11% 23% 15% 21% 30% Rick Santorum 6% 20% 16% 25% 33% Donald Trump 20% 16% 11% 44% 8% Scott Walker 14% 16% 10% 22% 37% 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Highway Patrol Celebrates 75 Years of Service, 1935-2010 *Editor’S Note: This Is the Second in a Two Part Series Chron - Pay Issues
    009-016 Feature (color) 7/5/10 8:31 PM Page 9 Montana Trooper Montana Highway Patrol celebrates 75 years of service, 1935-2010 *Editor’s note: This is the second in a two part series chron - pay issues. Ultimately, the strike lasted less than a week, icling the proud 75 year history of the Montana Highway with the legislature offering a pay increase. On December Patrol. This second segment covers 1989 through 2010. 19, Officer Shawn Driscoll was involved in a shooting with a bank robbery suspect near Missoula. The suspect fired In 1989, Attorney General Marc Racicot took office, and multiple rounds at Officer Driscoll from an assault rifle, and Colonel Robert Griffith was promoted to chief administra - Officer Driscoll returned fire with his 9mm pistol, fatally tor of the Patrol. The retired patrolmen’s association merged injuring the suspect. Officer Driscoll was subsequently award - with the AMHP. Montanans enjoyed a 40 year traffic fatal - ed the Medal of Valor for his actions that day. ity low with 181 fatalities. In May, the AMHP initiated a In 1992, light blue Chevrolet Caprice patrol cars were scholarship program for member’s children. In again issued, and Officer Shawn Driscoll became April, Officer Mary Pat Murphy was wounded one of the first officers to have a video camera by a suspect driver who had shot and killed installed in his patrol car, purchased at his his passenger on US Highway 87 North, north own expense. Local DUI Task Force of Great Falls. While she eventually returned organizations also began purchasing to duty, her injuries later forced her early cameras for officers to document disability retirement several years later.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economist/Yougov Poll
    The Economist/YouGov Poll Sample 2000 General Population Respondents Conducted October 23 - 27, 2015 Margin of Error ±3% 1. Some people seem to follow what’s going on in government and public affairs most of the time, whether there’s an election going on or not. Others aren’t that interested. Would you say you follow what’s going on in government and public affairs ... ? Most of the time . 48% Some of the time . 30% Only now and then . .13% Hardly at all . 9% Don’t know . .1% 2. Would you say things in this country today are... Generally headed in the right direction . 27% Off on the wrong track . 62% Not sure . 11% 3. Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people? Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t favorable favorable unfavorable unfavorable know Hillary Clinton 21% 21% 12% 39% 7% Lawrence Lessig 2% 7% 11% 12% 68% Martin O’Malley 2% 15% 16% 16% 51% Bernie Sanders 18% 24% 15% 22% 22% 4. How liberal or conservative are the Democrats listed below? Respondent placed item on scale from 0 - "Very Liberal" to 100 - "Very Conservative". Hillary Clinton . .28 Lawrence Lessig . .33 Martin O’Malley . 33 Bernie Sanders . 24 1 The Economist/YouGov Poll 5. The percentage of respondents who selected ’not sure’ about the comparative ideology of the listed politicians. Rated candidate Not sure Hillary Clinton 89% 11% Lawrence Lessig 40% 60% Martin O’Malley 54% 46% Bernie Sanders 82% 18% 6. If you had to choose one, which one of these individuals would you want to be the Democratic nominee for president in 2016? Asked of registered voters who identify as Democrats Hillary Clinton .
    [Show full text]