Corridor Capacity
TAG Amsterdam - 12 October 2016
easier, faster, safer Overview C-OSS activities
Y-2016 TT 2015 Managing offer and requests for Reserve Capacity PaPs MAY 2015 – NOVEMBER 2016 TT 2016
Monitoring Publication PaP Managing requests for Publication PaPs for Managing offer and f/o/tailormade Catalogue yearly timetable requests for RC late path requests construction Mid-JANUARY Mid-APRIL MAY MAY - AUGUST From OCTOBER TT 2017
Expression of Capacity Coordination quantity of Coordination Publication Preparation Needs PaPs construction of PaP MAY JUNE SEPTEMBER - NOVEMBER DECEMBER
TODAY easier, faster, safer 2 Share capacity allocated via C-OSS in total scheduled traffic
easier, faster, safer 3 Share capacity allocated via C-OSS in total scheduled traffic The exact percentages are as follows: RFC NSM border share Essen/Roosendaal 8% Mouscron/Tourcoing 64% Aubange/Rodange 39% Aubange/Mont-St-Martin 84%
Zoufftgen/Bettembourg 16% Basel/St.Louis 53% Blandain/Baisieux 51% Erquelinnes/Jeumont 5% However, it must be noted that due to the following reasons, the figures can only be regarded as an indication Works or last minute demands from the customer might lead to changing timetables, routing or calendar (partly or entirely) Cancelations (between allocation by C-OSS and start of timetable – partly or entirely)
easier, faster, safer 4 Evolution Requests Annual Timetable
RFC NSM Capacity Evolution 16
14
12
10 per year per
Published Capacity 8
Requested Capacity kms Pre-Allocated Capacity 6
million 4
2
0 TT2015 TT2016 TT2017
easier, faster, safer Overview Applicants
A total of 19 applicants requested capacity via the C-OSS (19 for TT2016, 13 for TT2015) 1 non RU-applicant
A total of 10 applicants requested PaP capacity on RFC NSM (11 for TT 2016, 3 for TT2015) 2 non RU-applicants
RFC NSM dossiers per client (PaP or f/o)
10 applicants have more dossiers than last year 1 applicant had the same amount of dossiers than last year 3 applicants had less dossiers than last year 5 new customers
easier, faster, safer Amsterdam
Maasvlakte Kijfhoek
(1) London Roosendaal
Roosendaal - Essen border Antwerpen Dunkerque Mechelen Montzen Zeebrugge Liège
Dollands Mouscron fr Charleroi Moor Calais Namur Aubange Rodange fr Valenciennes Lille Jeumont fr Bettembourg Mont St Martin fr Somain
Requests Requests Zoufftgen fr
Thionville Tergnier Metz Strasbourg
Toul
Paris St. Louis fr Basel
LEGENDA: Dijon
Geographical border
RFC NSM (IM) border
RFC NSM Section Node
Overlapping Section with: Multicorridor Lyon - RFC Atlantic
- RFC Mediterranean Ambérieu
- RFC Rhine Alpine + North Sea - Baltic Connection with RFC Rhine Alpine
Connection with RFC Atlantic
Connection with RFC MED easier, faster, safer Marseille Connection with RFC Rhine Alpine an RFC North Sea - Baltic Multicorridor Requests
57 out of 134 dossiers contained PaP requests on several corridors (30 last year)
27 dossiers were received with PaPs also on the Rhine Alpine (19 last year)
9 dossiers were received with PaPs also on the (1 last year – 6 also with )
24 dossiers were received with PaPs also on the (10 last year - 6 also with )
For the first time, 3 dossiers contained also PaPs on the +
easier, faster, safer Reserve Capacity
The Corridor published the majority of the remaining PaP capacity via PCS, for late and ad-hoc path requests (reserve capacity), beginning of May:
Published as regular (fix) PaPs to be able to assure and protect the capacity for international freight traffics through the late and ad-hoc request phases
Regular updates will be provided on the website and via mail newsletters
Up to now, 10% of this capacity has been requested
The remaining capacity will be available up to 30 days before potential circulation of the train (but might be updated throughout the year)
easier, faster, safer
Strategy PaP Catalogue TT2018 In June 2016, the RFC NSM Managing Board agreed on the following principles to construct the TT2018 PaP catalogue: 1- Amsterda 18- 18- Maasvlak Kijfho 1 m General Rule: at least a status quo in term of quantity 11 aansluiting te 11 te ek and quality per section Roosend Roosendaal richting
aal Roosendaal - Essen 18-18 Breda Antwerpen -
Improvement of the offer on sections where possible Antwerpen - Zuid border naar Nd naar Duitsland via
W.H. 20- 13- Zeebrug Montzen/Aachen, op
20 Potential lowering of the offer on the limited sections 13 ge via - naar RFC1Aubange, & 8 - naar Gent, with no demand RFC1 Luxembourg, Basel, Lyon Moeskroen, Rijsel,
and Marseille Calais, London en
- Connecties voorzien: Parijs easier, faster, safer ° met RFC4 rijpaden in Metz
- Connecties voorzien (komende van/richting
met RFC4 rijpaden in Duitsland)
Parijs (richting
° met RFC6 rijpaden Spanje)
(verschillende knooppunten
op de as Lyon-
Marseille, richting Spanje
en in Ambérieu, richting
Italië)
° met RFC1 rijpaden in
Basel (al dan niet met
network PaP)
LEGEN
DA:
R
FC NSM
border
LEGEND
RFC NSM A:
Section RF
Node C NSM
G border
eographic
al RFC
border NSM
Section
Overlappi Node
ng Section G
with RFC eographic
MED al
RF border
C NSM LEGE
Section NDA: Overlappi
ng
Junction Section
with RFC RFC with RFC
Rhine NSM MED
Alpine (+ border RF
RFC North C NSM
Sea-Baltic Section
in RFC
Antwerp, NSM Junctio
Rotterdam Sectio n with
and n RFC Rhine
Montzen) Node Alpine (+
RFC North
G Sea-Baltic
Junction eograp in
with RFC hical Antwerp,
Atlantic border Rotterda
m and
Junction Montzen)
with RFC Overla
MED pping
Sectio Junctio
n with n with
RFC RFC
MED Atlantic
RF Junction
C NSM with RFC
Sectio MED
n
Junc
tion
with
RFC
Rhine
Alpine
(+
RFC
North
Sea-
Baltic
in
Antwe
rp,
Rotter
dam
and
Montz
en)
J
unctio
n with
RFC
Atlanti
c
Junctio
n with
RFC
MED
Input PaP Catalogue: 3 pillars
1- Amsterda 18- •offer based on •Not all clients •To allow 18- Kijfho Maasvlak real demand / submit their capacity for new 1 m expectations capacity wishes traffics 11 aansluiting te 11 te ek Roosend •no priority for •Not all •To allow a more Roosendaal richting expressed international stable offer aal Roosendaal - Essen Breda capacity wishes traffic flows are 18-18 Antwerpen - submitted as Antwerpen - Zuid •Added value capacity wish border naar Nd naar Duitsland via for the W.H. 20- customer lies in years wishes 13- higher Zeebrug Montzen/Aachen, op
probability for a 20 13 PaP offer that ge via - naar RFC1Aubange, & 8 fits to its needs - naar Gent,
Expression of capacity capacity of Expression RFC1 Luxembourg, Basel, Lyon IM/AB specific specific IM/AB capacity possibilities/constraints Moeskroen, Rijsel,
experiences of the previous previous the of experiences and Marseille Calais, London en
- Connecties voorzien: Parijs easier, faster, safer ° met RFC4 rijpaden in Metz
- Connecties voorzien (komende van/richting
met RFC4 rijpaden in Duitsland)
Parijs (richting
° met RFC6 rijpaden Spanje)
(verschillende knooppunten
op de as Lyon-
Marseille, richting Spanje
en in Ambérieu, richting
Italië)
° met RFC1 rijpaden in
Basel (al dan niet met
network PaP)
LEGEN
DA:
R
FC NSM
border
LEGEND
RFC NSM A:
Section RF
Node C NSM
G border
eographic
al RFC
border NSM
Section
Overlappi Node
ng Section G
with RFC eographic
MED al
RF border
C NSM LEGE
Section NDA: Overlappi
ng
Junction Section
with RFC RFC with RFC
Rhine NSM MED
Alpine (+ border RF
RFC North C NSM
Sea-Baltic Section
in RFC
Antwerp, NSM Junctio
Rotterdam Sectio n with
and n RFC Rhine
Montzen) Node Alpine (+
RFC North
G Sea-Baltic
Junction eograp in
with RFC hical Antwerp,
Atlantic border Rotterda
m and
Junction Montzen)
with RFC Overla
MED pping
Sectio Junctio
n with n with
RFC RFC
MED Atlantic
RF Junction
C NSM with RFC
Sectio MED
n
Junc
tion
with
RFC
Rhine
Alpine
(+
RFC
North
Sea-
Baltic
in
Antwe
rp,
Rotter
dam
and
Montz
en)
J
unctio
n with
RFC
Atlanti
c
Junctio
n with
RFC
MED
The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained there in.
Contact [email protected] www.rfc-northsea-med.eu
ACF
easier, faster, safer 12 12/20/23