Corridor Capacity TAG Amsterdam - 12 October 2016 easier, faster, safer Overview C-OSS activities Y-2016 TT 2015 Managing offer and requests for Reserve Capacity PaPs MAY 2015 – NOVEMBER 2016 TT 2016 Monitoring Publication PaP Managing requests for Publication PaPs for Managing offer and f/o/tailormade Catalogue yearly timetable requests for RC late path requests construction Mid-JANUARY Mid-APRIL MAY MAY - AUGUST From OCTOBER TT 2017 Expression of Capacity Coordination quantity of Coordination Publication Preparation Needs PaPs construction of PaP MAY JUNE SEPTEMBER - NOVEMBER DECEMBER TODAY easier, faster, safer 2 Share capacity allocated via C-OSS in total scheduled traffic easier, faster, safer 3 Share capacity allocated via C-OSS in total scheduled traffic The exact percentages are as follows: RFC NSM border share Essen/Roosendaal 8% Mouscron/Tourcoing 64% Aubange/Rodange 39% Aubange/Mont-St-Martin 84% Zoufftgen/Bettembourg 16% Basel/St.Louis 53% Blandain/Baisieux 51% Erquelinnes/Jeumont 5% However, it must be noted that due to the following reasons, the figures can only be regarded as an indication Works or last minute demands from the customer might lead to changing timetables, routing or calendar (partly or entirely) Cancelations (between allocation by C-OSS and start of timetable – partly or entirely) easier, faster, safer 4 Evolution Requests Annual Timetable RFC NSM Capacity Evolution 16 14 12 10 per year per Published Capacity 8 Requested Capacity kms Pre-Allocated Capacity 6 million 4 2 0 TT2015 TT2016 TT2017 easier, faster, safer Overview Applicants A total of 19 applicants requested capacity via the C-OSS (19 for TT2016, 13 for TT2015) 1 non RU-applicant A total of 10 applicants requested PaP capacity on RFC NSM (11 for TT 2016, 3 for TT2015) 2 non RU-applicants RFC NSM dossiers per client (PaP or f/o) 10 applicants have more dossiers than last year 1 applicant had the same amount of dossiers than last year 3 applicants had less dossiers than last year 5 new customers easier, faster, safer Amsterdam Maasvlakte Kijfhoek (1) London Roosendaal Roosendaal - Essen border Antwerpen Dunkerque Mechelen Montzen Zeebrugge Liège Dollands Mouscron fr Charleroi Moor Calais Namur Aubange Rodange fr Valenciennes Lille Jeumont fr Bettembourg Mont St Martin fr Somain Requests Zoufftgen fr Thionville Tergnier Metz Strasbourg Toul Paris St. Louis fr Basel LEGENDA: Dijon Geographical border RFC NSM (IM) border RFC NSM Section Node Overlapping Section with: Multicorridor Lyon - RFC Atlantic - RFC Mediterranean Ambérieu - RFC Rhine Alpine + North Sea - Baltic Connection with RFC Rhine Alpine Connection with RFC Atlantic Connection with RFC MED easier, faster, safer Marseille Connection with RFC Rhine Alpine an RFC North Sea - Baltic Multicorridor Requests 57 out of 134 dossiers contained PaP requests on several corridors (30 last year) 27 dossiers were received with PaPs also on the Rhine Alpine (19 last year) 9 dossiers were received with PaPs also on the (1 last year – 6 also with ) 24 dossiers were received with PaPs also on the (10 last year - 6 also with ) For the first time, 3 dossiers contained also PaPs on the + easier, faster, safer Reserve Capacity The Corridor published the majority of the remaining PaP capacity via PCS, for late and ad-hoc path requests (reserve capacity), beginning of May: Published as regular (fix) PaPs to be able to assure and protect the capacity for international freight traffics through the late and ad-hoc request phases Regular updates will be provided on the website and via mail newsletters Up to now, 10% of this capacity has been requested The remaining capacity will be available up to 30 days before potential circulation of the train (but might be updated throughout the year) easier, faster, safer Strategy PaP Catalogue TT2018 In June 2016, the RFC NSM Managing Board agreed on the following principles to construct the TT2018 PaP catalogue: 1- Amsterda 18- 18- Maasvlak Kijfho 1 m General Rule: at least a status quo in term of quantity 11 aansluiting te 11 te ek and quality per section Roosend Roosendaal richting aal Roosendaal - Essen 18-18 Breda Antwerpen - Improvement of the offer on sections where possible Antwerpen - Zuid border naar Nd naar Duitsland via W.H. 20- 13- Zeebrug Montzen/Aachen, op 20 Potential lowering of the offer on the limited sections 13 ge via - naar RFC1Aubange, & 8 - naar Gent, with no demand RFC1 Luxembourg, Basel, Lyon Moeskroen, Rijsel, and Marseille Calais, London en - Connecties voorzien: Parijs easier, faster, safer ° met RFC4 rijpaden in Metz - Connecties voorzien (komende van/richting met RFC4 rijpaden in Duitsland) Parijs (richting ° met RFC6 rijpaden Spanje) (verschillende knooppunten op de as Lyon- Marseille, richting Spanje en in Ambérieu, richting Italië) ° met RFC1 rijpaden in Basel (al dan niet met network PaP) LEGEN DA: R FC NSM border LEGEND RFC NSM A: Section RF Node C NSM G border eographic al RFC border NSM Section Overlappi Node ng Section G with RFC eographic MED al RF border C NSM LEGE Section NDA: Overlappi ng Junction Section with RFC RFC with RFC Rhine NSM MED Alpine (+ border RF RFC North C NSM Sea-Baltic Section in RFC Antwerp, NSM Junctio Rotterdam Sectio n with and n RFC Rhine Montzen) Node Alpine (+ RFC North G Sea-Baltic Junction eograp in with RFC hical Antwerp, Atlantic border Rotterda m and Junction Montzen) with RFC Overla MED pping Sectio Junctio n with n with RFC RFC MED Atlantic RF Junction C NSM with RFC Sectio MED n Junc tion with RFC Rhine Alpine (+ RFC North Sea- Baltic in Antwe rp, Rotter dam and Montz en) J unctio n with RFC Atlanti c Junctio n with RFC MED Input PaP Catalogue: 3 pillars 1- Amsterda 18- •offer based on •Not all clients •To allow 18- Kijfho Maasvlak real demand / submit their capacity for new 1 m expectations capacity wishes traffics 11 aansluiting te 11 te ek Roosend •no priority for •Not all •To allow a more Roosendaal richting expressed international stable offer aal Roosendaal - Essen Breda capacity wishes traffic flows are 18-18 Antwerpen - submitted as Antwerpen - Zuid •Added value capacity wish border naar Nd naar Duitsland via for the W.H. 20- customer lies in years wishes 13- higher Zeebrug Montzen/Aachen, op probability for a 20 13 PaP offer that ge via - naar RFC1Aubange, & 8 fits to its needs - naar Gent, Expression of capacity capacity Expression of RFC1 Luxembourg, Basel, Lyon IM/AB specific IM/AB capacity possibilities/constraints Moeskroen, Rijsel, experiences of the previous the of experiences and Marseille Calais, London en - Connecties voorzien: Parijs easier, faster, safer ° met RFC4 rijpaden in Metz - Connecties voorzien (komende van/richting met RFC4 rijpaden in Duitsland) Parijs (richting ° met RFC6 rijpaden Spanje) (verschillende knooppunten op de as Lyon- Marseille, richting Spanje en in Ambérieu, richting Italië) ° met RFC1 rijpaden in Basel (al dan niet met network PaP) LEGEN DA: R FC NSM border LEGEND RFC NSM A: Section RF Node C NSM G border eographic al RFC border NSM Section Overlappi Node ng Section G with RFC eographic MED al RF border C NSM LEGE Section NDA: Overlappi ng Junction Section with RFC RFC with RFC Rhine NSM MED Alpine (+ border RF RFC North C NSM Sea-Baltic Section in RFC Antwerp, NSM Junctio Rotterdam Sectio n with and n RFC Rhine Montzen) Node Alpine (+ RFC North G Sea-Baltic Junction eograp in with RFC hical Antwerp, Atlantic border Rotterda m and Junction Montzen) with RFC Overla MED pping Sectio Junctio n with n with RFC RFC MED Atlantic RF Junction C NSM with RFC Sectio MED n Junc tion with RFC Rhine Alpine (+ RFC North Sea- Baltic in Antwe rp, Rotter dam and Montz en) J unctio n with RFC Atlanti c Junctio n with RFC MED The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained there in. Contact [email protected] www.rfc-northsea-med.eu ACF easier, faster, safer 12 12/20/23 .