Report Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report Template A Strategic Framework for the Reconstruction and Conservation of the Vertebrate Fauna of Dirk Hartog Island 2017 – 2030 Keith Morris, Manda Page, Neil Thomas and Kym Ottewell Science and Conservation Division January 2017 i Department of Parks and Wildlife Department of Parks and Wildlife Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 Phone: (08) 9219 9000 Fax: (08) 9334 0498 www.dpaw.wa.gov.au © Department of Parks and Wildlife on behalf of the State of Western Australia, January 2017 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Parks and Wildlife. This report was prepared by Keith Morris, Manda Page, Neil Thomas and Kym Ottewell. Questions regarding the use of this material should be directed to: Animal Science Program Leader Science and Conservation Division Department of Parks and Wildlife Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 Phone: 08 94055159, 0400 746 645 Email: [email protected] The recommended reference for this publication is: Morris K, Page M, Thomas N, Ottewell K (2017) A strategic framework for the reconstruction and conservation of the vertebrate fauna of Dirk Hartog Island 2016 - 2030. Department of Parks and Wildlife, Perth. This document is available in alternative formats on request. Please note: urls in this document which conclude a sentence are followed by a full point. If copying the url please do not include the full point. Cover photograph: Dirk Hartog Island looking south from Quoin Bluff, by Keith Morris (Parks and Wildlife). ii Department of Parks and Wildlife A Strategic Framework for the Reconstruction and Conservation of the Vertebrate Fauna of Dirk Hartog Island 2017 - 2033 Contents 1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... 3 2 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 3 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 4 Vision .............................................................................................................................. 6 5 Gorgon Barrow Island Net Conservation Benefit Fund ................................................... 6 6 Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 7 7 Administrative Framework ............................................................................................... 7 8 Planning the Translocations ............................................................................................ 8 8.1 Potential species for translocation............................................................................. 8 8.2 Selection of species for translocation ........................................................................ 9 8.2.1 Species for translocation for conservation purposes ........................................ 9 8.2.2 Species for translocation for fauna reconstruction purposes ............................ 9 8.3 Translocation timing and order ................................................................................ 10 8.4 Selection of source populations .............................................................................. 11 8.5 Selection of Dirk Hartog Island release sites ........................................................... 12 8.5.1 Suitable habitat .............................................................................................. 12 8.5.2 Species interaction and competition ............................................................... 12 8.5.3 Distance to support infrastructure .................................................................. 12 8.5.4 Track access .................................................................................................. 12 8.5.5 Physical barriers ............................................................................................. 12 8.5.6 Elevated areas ............................................................................................... 13 8.5.7 Management of potential hazards .................................................................. 13 8.5.8 Freehold land ................................................................................................. 13 9 Undertaking the translocations ...................................................................................... 13 9.1 Capture / collection of founder animals ................................................................... 13 9.2 Transport to Dirk Hartog Island ............................................................................... 13 9.3 Release on Dirk Hartog Island ................................................................................ 14 9.4 Monitoring of source populations ............................................................................ 14 9.5 Monitoring of translocated populations .................................................................... 14 10 Measures of success .................................................................................................... 14 11 Reporting ...................................................................................................................... 15 12 Research opportunities ................................................................................................ 15 1 Department of Park and Wildlife A Strategic Framework for the Reconstruction and Conservation of the Vertebrate Fauna of Dirk Hartog Island 2017 - 2033 13 References ................................................................................................................... 17 Glossary ............................................................................................................................ 20 Tables Table 1 Status of native mammal fauna on Dirk Hartog Island ......................................... 21 Table 2 Timing and order of fauna translocations to Dirk Hartog Island ............................ 22 Table 3 Potential sources for Dirk Hartog Island founders ................................................ 23 Table 4 Genetic issues in potential source populations ..................................................... 25 Figures Figure 1 Map of Dirk Hartog Island showing place names and infrastructure ................... 26 2 Department of Park and Wildlife A Strategic Framework for the Reconstruction and Conservation of the Vertebrate Fauna of Dirk Hartog Island 2017 - 2033 1 Acknowledgements This strategic framework has been developed in collaboration with the Dirk Hartog Island Ecological Restoration Project Management Committee. Several Parks and Wildlife Shark Bay District staff have been involved in the planning of this program since 2007 including Linda Reinhold, Colleen Sims and Kim Branch. Drafts of this document were reviewed by Parks and Wildlife Mid-West Region, Shark Bay District, and Science and Conservation Division staff. In particular, Dr Allan Burbidge, John Asher and Deanne von Senger provided useful comments. The fauna reconstruction and conservation project is largely funded by the Gorgon Barrow Island Net Conservation Benefits Fund. This fund is administered by Parks and Wildlife and approved by the Minister for Environment after considering advice from the Gorgon Barrow Island Net Conservation Benefits Advisory Board. 2 Executive Summary The Gorgon Gas Development Project on Barrow Island Nature Reserve was approved by the Western Australian and Federal Governments in 2009 and subject to several conservation undertakings relating to compensation for environmental disturbance on this valuable conservation area. In addition, a Net Conservation Benefits fund was established by the Western Australian Government, with agreement from Chevron Australia. This was to provide support to programs that will restore and protect previously degraded habitats, and undertake biodiversity conservation research to better inform initiatives to conserve and manage terrestrial ecosystems, and achieve a net conservation benefit. The Dirk Hartog Island National Park Ecological Restoration Project was considered a flagship project for the NCB to fund and Stage One commenced in 2011. This has successfully removed all sheep from Dirk Hartog Island, and feral goats will be eradicated by early 2017. Feral cats will be eradicated by September 2018. Stage Two of this project will commence in 2018 and will involve the reintroduction of 10 species of native mammal and one species of bird that formerly occurred on the island, and the introduction of two other threatened mammal species for conservation reasons, over a 12 year period. Additional mammal and bird species may be reintroduced if appropriate, depending on an ecological assessment of potential risks and benefits. This strategic plan provides the framework and direction for this ambitious program to occur. It covers the criteria used to select species for translocation, translocation planning, founder population monitoring, transport logistics, criteria for release site selection, and post-release monitoring. It also identifies
Recommended publications
  • Additional Records of Passerine Terrestrial Gaits
    ADDITIONAL RECORDS OF PASSERINE TERRESTRIAL GAITS GEORGE A. CLARK, JR. The varied methods of locomotion in birds pose significant problems in behavior, ecology, adaptation, and evolution. On the ground birds progress with their legs moving either synchronously (hopping) or asynchronously (walking, running) as the extreme conditions. Relatively terrestrial species often have asynchronous gaits, whereas primarily arboreal species are typically synchronous on the ground. Particularly important earlier studies on passerines are Kunkels’ (1962) comparative behavioral survey and Riiggebergs’ (1960) analysis of the morphological correlates of gaits. Over several years I have noted gaits for 47 passerine species in the U.S., En- gland, and Kenya, and have examined many references. I here sum- marize behavioral records for families not mentioned by Kunkel (1962) and also for species with gaits markedly unlike those of confamilial species discussed by him. My supplementary review is selective rather than ex- haustive with the aim of indicating more fully the distribution of gaits among the passerine families. Regional handbooks, life history studies, and other publications contain numerous additional records, but I know of none that negate the conclusions presented here. J. S. Greenlaw (in prep.) has reviewed elsewhere the passerine double-scratch foraging be- havior that has at times previously been discussed in connection with gaits (e.g., in Hailman 1973). VARIATION WITHIN SPECIES Gaits often vary within a species (Kunkel 1962, Hailman 1973, Schwartz 1964, Gobeil 1968, Eliot in Bent 1968:669-670, this study). As an addi- tional example, I have seen Common Grackles (Quisc&s quiscula) hop in contrast to their usual walk.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee
    Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories Compiled by S. Oldfield Edited by D. Procter and L.V. Fleming ISBN: 1 86107 502 2 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1999 Illustrations and layout by Barry Larking Cover design Tracey Weeks Printed by CLE Citation. Procter, D., & Fleming, L.V., eds. 1999. Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Disclaimer: reference to legislation and convention texts in this document are correct to the best of our knowledge but must not be taken to infer definitive legal obligation. Cover photographs Front cover: Top right: Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome (Richard White/JNCC). The world’s largest concentrations of southern rockhopper penguin are found on the Falkland Islands. Centre left: Down Rope, Pitcairn Island, South Pacific (Deborah Procter/JNCC). The introduced rat population of Pitcairn Island has successfully been eradicated in a programme funded by the UK Government. Centre right: Male Anegada rock iguana Cyclura pinguis (Glen Gerber/FFI). The Anegada rock iguana has been the subject of a successful breeding and re-introduction programme funded by FCO and FFI in collaboration with the National Parks Trust of the British Virgin Islands. Back cover: Black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris (Richard White/JNCC). Of the global breeding population of black-browed albatross, 80 % is found on the Falkland Islands and 10% on South Georgia. Background image on front and back cover: Shoal of fish (Charles Sheppard/Warwick
    [Show full text]
  • Neotropical News Neotropical News
    COTINGA 1 Neotropical News Neotropical News Brazilian Merganser in Argentina: If the survey’s results reflect the true going, going … status of Mergus octosetaceus in Argentina then there is grave cause for concern — local An expedition (Pato Serrucho ’93) aimed extinction, as in neighbouring Paraguay, at discovering the current status of the seems inevitable. Brazilian Merganser Mergus octosetaceus in Misiones Province, northern Argentina, During the expedition a number of sub­ has just returned to the U.K. Mergus tropical forest sites were surveyed for birds octosetaceus is one of the world’s rarest — other threatened species recorded during species of wildfowl, with a population now this period included: Black-fronted Piping- estimated to be less than 250 individuals guan Pipile jacutinga, Vinaceous Amazon occurring in just three populations, one in Amazona vinacea, Helmeted Woodpecker northern Argentina, the other two in south- Dryocopus galeatus, White-bearded central Brazil. Antshrike Biata s nigropectus, and São Paulo Tyrannulet Phylloscartes paulistus. Three conservation biologists from the U.K. and three South American counter­ PHIL BENSTEAD parts surveyed c.450 km of white-water riv­ Beaver House, Norwich Road, Reepham, ers and streams using an inflatable boat. Norwich, NR10 4JN, U.K. Despite exhaustive searching only one bird was located in an area peripheral to the species’s historical stronghold. Former core Black-breasted Puffleg found: extant areas (and incidently those with the most but seriously threatened. protection) for this species appear to have been adversely affected by the the Urugua- The Black-breasted Puffleg Eriocnemis í dam, which in 1989 flooded c.80 km of the nigrivestis has been recorded from just two Río Urugua-í.
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGES to IBPAOU20.DBF (FROM IBPAOU20.DBF) BASED on AOS (2021) This File Documents All Changes to Species Names and Codes to IB
    CHANGES TO IBPAOU20.DBF (FROM IBPAOU20.DBF) BASED ON AOS (2021) This file documents all changes to species names and codes to IBPAOU21 (from IBPAOU20) performed in June 2021. These changes are based on changes to species and nomenclature as recorded in the 62nd Supplement to the AOS Checklist, made available online by the AOS in late June 2020. In all cases additions and changes were thoroughly cross-checked for new conflicts and for the release of old conflicts. Unless stated it can be assumed that no new conflicts occurred. NUMB, CAT, PNO, and ORD codes (species number, category, species status, and order) are internal codes used by IBP, in part to resolve conflicts (see Pyle and DeSante 2003, listed on IBP's alpha-code page for details). Changed: Falcipennis canadensis (Spruce Grouse) to Canachites canadensis, SPEC6 to CANCAN (from FALCAN). Inserted: Common Wood Pigeon (Columba palumbas) (after Rock Pigeon); NUMB=12513, CAT=2, SPEC=CWPI, ORD=1, SPEC6=COLPAL, ORD6=1. Re-arranged: 9 species among genus Chaetura as indicated. Changed: Calliphlox bryantae (Magenta-throated Woodstar) to Philodice bryantae, and C. mitchellii (Purple-throated Woodstar) to P. mitcheillii; SPEC6 to PHIBRY (from CALBRY) and PHIMIT (from CALMIT), respectively. Inserted: Amazilia Hummingbird (Amazilis amazilia) (after Mangrove Hummingbird); NUMB=08205, CAT=3, SPEC=AMHU, ORD=1, SPEC6=AMAAMZ, ORD6=2. ORD6 = 2 due to conflict of ORD6=1 code (AMAAMA) with that for Amandava amandava (see below). Inserted: Pallas's Gull (Icthyaetus icthyaetus) (after Franklin's Gull); NUMB=04605, CAT=2, SPEC=PAGU, ORD=1, SPEC6=ICHICH, ORD6=1. Changed: Mew Gull to Common Gull (Larus canus), NUMB to 04677 (from 04680), CAT to 2 (from 1), SPEC to COGU (from MEGU).
    [Show full text]
  • Thick Billed Grass Wren (Macdonnell Ranges Subspecies)
    Threatened Species of the Northern Territory THICK-BILLED GRASSWREN (MacDonnell Ranges subspecies) Amytornis modestus modestus Conservation status Australia: Vulnerable (as A. textilis modestus) Northern Territory: Extinct Photo*: G. Chapman Description The MacDonnell Ranges subspecies of the The thick-billed grass-wren is a small ground thick-billed grasswren A. m. modestus was bird (length 15-20 cm) with a long tail. The formerly present in the Finke River drainage upperparts are dull brown in colour with the underparts being paler fawn. Feathers are streaked with white. The female has a chestnut patch on either side of the breast. The eyes are dark brown, the bill and feet are dark grey. It is distinguished from other subspecies by the particulars of its tail, and from the closely-related western grass-wren by its lighter body colour and heavier bill. *There is no known photo of this taxon. The photo above is of another living sub-species of A. modestus. Distribution A recent taxonomic review separates A. modestus and A. textilis as distinct species (Black et al. 2010). The thick-billed grasswren Previous locations of the MacDonnell Ranges thick-billed grass-wren A. modestus occurred as three subspecies in arid and semi-arid regions of southern basin from Mereenie Bluff and the upper Australia (Higgins et al. 2000), two of which Hugh River south to Lauries Creek, McMinns Creek and the lower Finke (Storr 1977). have been recorded in the Northern Territory (NT). For more information visit www.denr.nt.gov.au A small isolated population of the north- the north-western subspecies persists in the western subspecies A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Behavioural Ecology of the Thick-Billed Grasswren
    The behavioural ecology of the thick-billed grasswren Marina (Maria Carolina Johanna) Louter (MSc Biology) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering Flinders University of South Australia Cover image: Typical thick-billed grasswren habitat with chenopod shrubs at Witchelina Nature Reserve in South Australia, and (inset) a thick-billed grasswren (Amytornis modestus raglessi) in the hand. Photos by Marina Louter. ii Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures ................................................................................................................... ix List of Supplementary Material ..................................................................................... xi Thesis Summary .............................................................................................................. xii Declaration...................................................................................................................... xiv Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... xv Statement of Authorship/Contribution and Acknowledgment ............................... xviii Chapter 1 General introduction ................................................................ 1 Behavioural conservation framework ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Report Species - Cistothorus Platensis Page I of 19
    Comprehensive Report Species - Cistothorus platensis Page I of 19 NatureServe () EXPLORER • '•rr•K•;7",,v2' <-~~~ •••'F"'< •j • ':'•k• N :;}• <"• Seach bot. the Dat -Abou-U Cot Chana eCrite «<Previous I Next»> Cistothorusplatensis - (Latham, 1790) Google, Sedge Wren Search for Images on Google Spanish Common Names: Chivirin Sabanero, Chercan de las Vegas French Common Names: Troglodyte & bec court Other Common Names: Curruira-do-Campo Unique Identifier: ELEMENTGLOBAL.2.105322 Element Code: ABPBG10010 Informal Taxonomy: Animals, Vertebrates - Birds - Perching Birds Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Animalia Craniata Aves Passeriformes Troglodytidae Cistothorus Genus Size: B - Very small genus (2-5 species) Check this box to expand all report sections: Concept Reference 0 Concept Reference: American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 829 pp. Concept Reference Code: B98AOU01NAUS Name Used in Concept Reference: Cistothorusplatensis Taxonomic Comments: Formerly known as Short-billed Marsh-Wren. Composed of three groups: STELLARIS (Sedge Wren), PLATENSIS (Western Grass-Wren), and POLYGLOTTUS (Eastern Grass-Wren) (AOU 1998). Constitutes a superspecies with C. MERIDAE and C. APOLINARI (AOU 1998). Conservation Status 0 NatureServe Status Global Status: G5 Global Status Last Reviewed: 03Dec1996 Global Status Last Changed: 03Dec1996 Rounded Global Status: G5 - Secure Nation: United States National Status: N4B,N5N Nation: Canada National Status:N5B
    [Show full text]
  • Amytornis Textilis )
    Amytornis 1 WESTER A USTRALIA J OURAL OF O RITHOLOGY Volume 3 (2011) 1-12 ARTICLE Western Australia, home of the Grass-Wren ( Amytornis textilis ) Andrew Black Ornithology Section, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia 5000. Email: [email protected] Abstract. The first grasswrens to be seen by Europeans, at Shark Bay, were given the English name Textile Wren, later the Grass-Wren. Though detected subsequently in many other places in southern Western Australia they then declined dramatically and soon disappeared from all but the place of their original discovery. Specimens collected many hundreds of kilometres apart and in varying environments showed differences that led to their be- ing given many separate names. They were shortly dispersed among Australian and later among North American institutions with none having a fully representative collection. Subsequent extinctions restricted the opportunity to confirm or modify this implicit taxonomic diversity. From evidence presented here I propose that two Western Australian subspecies be recognised as separate, Amytornis textilis textilis of the Shark Bay region and arid north- ern interior and A. t. macrourus of southern eucalypt communities. Keywords . Western Grasswren, morphological diversity, habitat diversity, taxonomy, subspecies macrourus rec- ognised. Introduction lution of the Australian arid zone fauna. In an earlier analysis of the confounding taxonomy The first grasswrens, genus Amytornis (Maluridae), to of the grasswrens Amytornis textilis , modestus and be given scientific description were obtained in 1818 at purnelli Parker (1972) wrote: "The Western Australian Shark Bay Western Australia by Quoy and Gaimard records of textilis will be discussed by Mr. J. Ford (in (1824).
    [Show full text]
  • Uluṟu-Kata Tjuṯa National Park Has More Birds Than Any Other Kind Of
    Fact sheet Birds Yellow throated miner CREDIT: Corrine Le Gall Uluṟu-Kata Tjuṯa National Park has more Puli – rocky areas Tjalpu-tjalpu, (white-breasted birds than any other kind of animal. Familiarise Birds soar around Uluṟu and woodswallow, white-browed Kata Tjuṯa, or live among woodswallow, and black- yourself with Pitjantjatjara names so you can the plants growing at their faced woodswallow) glide for identify the birds in their natural habitats. bases. It is likely you will insects high on the cliff faces. see at least one species Tjanpi – spinifex Survival in arid regions of hawk. Tjanpi is a specialised Water dictates the survival of birds in arid regions. Many Species to look for include; habitat on the rocky slopes birds are either nomadic or migratory and after long periods Kirkinpa (brown falcon– around Kata Tjuṯa. of rain will move into the park in great numbers. Australian kestrel–Peregrine falcon), Wowo (Australian This particular spinifex The need to drink usually keeps birds within flying distance hobby), black-breasted species forms very prickly, of water. Insect eating birds (the largest group) and kite, Aralapalpalpa (crested fine-needled hummocks that carnivorous species supplement their water intake through pigeon), Warutjilyarpa you will be able to spot from moisture from food. To reduce water loss, bird droppings do Ptilotula keartlandi various points along the not contain much liquid. Instead, some birds pass crystals (grey-headed honeyeater), Valley of the Winds circuit. with their faeces. In high temperatures, small birds lose and Pititjaku-pititjaku water rapidly through evaporation – with most of it is lost There are two uncommon (pied butcherbird).
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Biodiversity – Responses to Fire
    AUSTRALIA’S BIODIVERSITY – RESPONSES TO FIRE Plants, birds and invertebrates A.M. Gill, J.C.Z. Woinarski, A. York Biodiversity Technical Paper, No. 1 Cover photograph credits Group of 3 small photos, front cover: • Cockatiel. The Cockatiel is one of a group of highly mobile birds which track resource-rich areas. These areas fluctuate across broad landscapes in response to local rainfall or fire events. Large flocks may congregate on recently-burnt areas. /Michael Seyfort © Nature Focus • Fern regeneration post-fire, Clyde Mountain, NSW, 1988. /A. Malcolm Gill • These bull ants (Myrmecia gulosa) are large ants which generally build small mounds and prefer open areas in which to forage for food. They are found on frequently burnt sites. Despite their fierce appearance, they feed mainly on plant products. /Alan York. Small photo, lower right, front cover: • Fuel reduction burning in dry forest. This burn is towards the “hotter” end of the desirable range. /Alan York Large photo on spine: • Forest fire, Kapalga, NT, 1990. /Malcolm Gill Small photo, back cover: • Cycad response after fire near Darwin, NT. /Malcolm Gill ISBN 0 642 21422 0 Published by the Department of the Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia, 1999 Information presented in this document may be copied for personal use or pub- lished for educational purposes, provided that any extracts are acknowledged. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department, or of the Commonwealth of Australia. Biodiversity Convention and Strategy Section Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 636 CANBERRA ACT 2601 General enquiries, telephone 1800 803772 Design: Design One Solutions, Canberra Printing: Goanna Print, Canberra Printed in Australia on recycled Australian paper AUSTRALIA’S BIODIVERSITY – RESPONSES TO FIRE Plants, birds and invertebrates A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Bird Communities in Natural and Disturbed Non-Wetland Open Habitats in the Cerrado’S Central Region, Brazil
    Bird Conservation International (2000) 10:331–350. BirdLife International 2000 A comparison of bird communities in natural and disturbed non-wetland open habitats in the Cerrado’s central region, Brazil. DA´ RIUS P. TUBELIS and ROBERTO B. CAVALCANTI Summary In the Cerrado of Brazil, the largest Neotropical savanna region, open habitats are suffering an intense process of conversion to pasture and agricultural land. This study evaluated the responses of birds to the thinning of tree and shrub cover in plots of cerrado sensu stricto, the dominant habitat in the region, and examined whether disturbed plots supported bird communities of open natural habitats with similar structure. Birds were censused by point counts in five disturbed sites and in seven preserved patches, with a total of 304 samples of 20 minutes in 68 points. Cleared plots were not suitable for species strongly dependent on trees and shrubs, such as frugivores and most insectivores. Their abundance was associated with the complexity of vegetation structure in these plots. Shrubby pastures held about 120% more species than the traditional cleared ones. Bird communities of pastures showed large differences in relation to those of grasslands with similar structure. Communities of pastures were dominated by a seedeater, the Blue-black Grassquit Volatinia jacarina, and most species were habitat generalist or oportunistic predators, such as raptors and insectivores. Obligate grassland species, like the Grass Wren Cistothorus platensis, Cock-tailed Tyrant Alectrurus tricolor and Black-masked Finch Coryphaspiza melanotis, as well as other abundant species in grasslands, such as Sharp-tailed Grass-tyrant Culicivora caudacuta and Capped Seedeater Sporophila bouvreuil do not adapt to pastures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Norway Rats on Coastal Waterbirds of the Falkland Islands: a Preliminary Analysis
    S. Poncet, K. Passfi eld, A. Kuepfer and M.A. Tabak Poncet, S.; K. Passfi eld, A. Kuepfer and M.A. Tabak. The eff ect of Norway rats on coastal waterbirds of the Falkland Islands: a preliminary analysis The effect of Norway rats on coastal waterbirds of the Falkland Islands: a preliminary analysis S. Poncet1, K. Passfi eld2, A. Kuepfer3 and M.A. Tabak4,5 1Antarctic Research Trust, P.O. Box 685, Stanley, Falkland Islands. <[email protected]> 2Island LandCare, P.O. Box 538, Stanley, Falkland Islands. 3Department of Natural Resources, Falkland Islands Government, Stanley, Falkland Islands. 4Quantitative Science Consulting, LLC, 765 North 10th St., Laramie, WY 82072 USA. 5Department of Zoology & Physiology, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY 82071 USA. Abstract The Falkland Islands have been aff ected by anthropogenic-induced habitat modifi cation including introduction of invasive species and grazing by livestock. Introduced Norway rats are known to have a large eff ect on native Falklands passerines but their eff ect on other native birds has not been explored. We investigated the eff ects of several environmental variables, including the presence of Norway rats and chronic grazing by livestock, on an assemblage of 22 species of coastal waterbirds by comparing species richness and relative abundance of birds among 65 rat-infested islands, 29 rat- eradicated islands and 76 historically rat-free islands. Bird count data from 299 km of coastline were used to estimate relative bird abundance, expressed as the number of individuals per kilometre of coastline for each species. Our study provided three key results.
    [Show full text]