Knowledge and Social Order in Early Abbasid Mesopotamia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Knowledge and Social Order in Early Abbasid Mesopotamia Knowledge and Social Order in Early Islamic Mesopotamia (60–193 AH/680–809 CE) Najm al-Din Yousefi Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Science and Technology Studies Joseph C. Pitt Richard M. Burian Daniel Breslau Sayyed Mohammad Hossein Manzoor al-Adjdad December 10, 2009 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: dīwān, knowledge production, Arab conquests, medieval Mesopotamia, Islamic polity Copyright ©2009 Najm al-Din Yousefi Knowledge and Social Order in Early Islamic Mesopotamia (60–193 AH/680–809 CE) Najm al-Din Yousefi Abstract The present study explores the ways in which competing frameworks of knowledge sought to order society in early Islamic Mesopotamia (60–193 AH/680–809 CE). This research examines the conditions under which two frameworks of knowledge came into being; how they tried to maximize their power through forging alliance with the caliphate; how they established the legitimacy of their knowledge; and how they promoted their visions of social order. The first framework of knowledge is associated with the secretaries, as state bureaucrats, who helped transfer ancient administrative methods and practices to the emerging Islamic polity. Their immense assistance in tackling manifold problems of the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates consisted not only in offering technical know-how, useful administrative practices, expertise, and political wisdom, but also in addressing the foundational problems of the polity. This research argues that the secretaries’ solution to the caliphate’s structural problems—particularly the crisis of legitimacy—might have run counter to the social order promoted by Muslim religious scholars (the ‘ulamā’). The secretaries’ framework of knowledge and its concomitant social order, then, posed a threat to the authority of the ‘ulamā’ who pursued an alternative framework of knowledge rooted in sacred sources of law. Delving into a number of treatises composed and/or translated by the champions of these knowledge frameworks (e.g., ‘Abd al-Ḥamīd b. Yaḥyā, Ibn al-Muqaffa‘, and Abū Yūsuf), this dissertation concludes that the validation of knowledge and expertise involved more than solving specific problems such as maximizing the government revenues and efficiently collecting taxes from subjects; it rather relied on the ability of knowledge and expertise to offer solutions to the problem of social and political order. Dedication To Mehri, my companion in life; and to Kimiya, the elixir of my life; To my parents, Fariborz Yousefi and Esmat Forouzandeh, who have unconditionally supported my intellectual interests; And to the loving memory of my grandfather and first teacher, Yaqub Yousefi. iii Acknowledgements It is with much pleasure that I acknowledge the debts I have accumulated over the course of completing my graduate studies. I would not have been able to bring this work to a satisfactory close without numerous sacrifices that my wife, Mehri Shams, and my daughter, Kimiya Yousefi, have made over the past several years. Professors Joseph Pitt and Richard Burian afforded me much encouragement and support in considering this topic for my dissertation research. Professor Pitt helped me define the scope of the project and clarify its methodology. Professor Burain’s perceptive critique of the concept of knowledge will serve as a guidepost for the expansion and revision of this work in the future. Professor Daniel Breslau helped me pay closer attention to the social dynamics of knowledge production. This dissertation is an outcome of more than two decades of continuous dialogue with my dear friend and teacher, Professor Sayyed Mohammad Hossein Manzoor al-Adjadad. Professor Manzoor al-Adjadad kept reminding me of the importance of this investigation for a more thorough understanding of Islamic civilization in the medieval period. In addition to providing me with access to a large number of primary and secondary sources that are not readily available in the United States, Professor Manzoor al-Adjadad patiently helped me unravel historical data and textual intricacies. Needless to say, I am responsible for any shortcoming and errors that remain in this work. It was my dear friend, Professor Djavad Salehi-Isfahani (Department of Economics), who encouraged me to apply to Virginia Tech’s graduate program in Science and Technology Studies. In addition to his continuous support of my research, Professor Salehi-Isfahani and his family have made our past few years in Blacksburg all the more pleasant and interesting. iv My STS friends and colleagues, Professors Matthew Goodrum and Barbara Reeves, have shared with me an interest in the broad topic of science in the medieval Islamic world. Their comments and pointed questions have helped me rethink some of my arguments. In particular, Professor Reeves assisted me in tracing the “marginality thesis” in contemporary scholarship. Professor William Ochsenwald (Emeritus, Department of History) read parts of the dissertation and provided useful comments for improvement. Moreover, he has graciously offered assistance in treading the path of Islamic studies in the academic arena. My dear friend, Mr. Moataz Bellah Mohammed Abdel Salam Khalifa (Department of Physics) let me benefit from his vast knowledge of the classical Arabic language. He took time out of his busy schedule to answer my questions and was particularly instrumental in dissecting difficult passages in Ibn al-Muqaffa‘’s Risāla fi al-Ṣaḥāba (Treatise concerning the Entourage). Professor Justine McCarthy (Department of History, University of Louisville) kindly granted me permission to use one of the maps from his Map Project (2001). It would not have been possible to carry out this research without the immense help I have received from Dr. Bruce Pencek, Librarian of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, and the staff of Interlibrary Loan. They enabled me to gain access to important primary and secondary sources. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………...ii DEDICATION…………………………………………………………………………...iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………………………...iv LIST OF FIGURES….…………………………………………………………………..viii TRANSLITERATION, DATES, AND ABBREVIATIONS …………………………………...Viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………….1 METHODOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY….………………………………………..5 SOURCES………………………………………………………………………10 LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………………….11 ORGANIZATION OF THE DISSERTATION………………………………………..24 CHAPTER 2: THE ARAB CONQUESTS AND THE DĪWĀN………………………………...26 THE DĪWĀN …………………………………………………………………...28 THE DĪWĀN SECRETARIES AND THEIR CRAFT…...…………………………….39 ASSIMILATION OF SECRETARIES INTO MUSLIM SOCIETY………………………42 ADMINISTRATIVE AND FISCAL REFORMS………………………………………49 CONTINUITY AND CHANGE UNDER THE ABBASIDS……………………………..59 THE DĪWĀN AS A SITE OF KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION………………………….64 CHAPTER 3: THE DĪWĀN SECRETARIES AND THE FORMATION OF A DISCOURSE………..75 ADAB AND THE CRAFT OF WRITING………………………………………….....77 THREE EXEMPLARS OF ADAB .………………………………………………….82 I. ABU AL-‘ALĀ SĀLIM………..…………………………………..83 II. ‘ABD AL-ḤAMĪD B. YAHYĀ……………………………………..87 III. ‘ABD ALLĀH B. AL-MUQAFFA‘…..……………………………..97 THE SECRETARIES’ DISCOURSE OF KNOWLEDGE…………………………….. 118 vi CHAPTER 4: THE ISLAMIC POLITY AND THE COMPETING FRAMEWORKS OF KNOWLEDGE…………………………………….….123 THE LAND TAX, PUBLIC POLICY, AND THE EMERGENCE OF A COMPETING DISCOURSE………………………..126 ABŪ YŪSUF’S KITĀB AL-KHARĀJ (BOOK OF THE LAND-TAX) …………………... 132 YAHYĀ B. ĀDAM’S KITĀB AL-KHARĀJ (BOOK OF THE LAND-TAX) ………………150 THE JURISTIC DISCOURSE OF KNOWLEDGE AND SOCIAL ORDER……………….156 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION: KNOWLEDGE AND SOCIAL ORDER………………………….163 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………….180 vii List of Figures Figure 1: Regions of the Modern Middle East (p. 9) Transliteration, Dates, and Abbreviations In this dissertation I use the transliteration system of the Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd edition (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1960–2005). However, I have made a few modifications to this system, and the letter “q” rather than “ḳ” for (ج) including the use of the letter “j” rather than “dj” for jīm I have also decided that it would be redundant to transliterate anglicized words such as .(ق) qāf caliph (khalīfa), Umayyad (’Umayya), Abbasid (‘Abbāsī), as well as the name of certain cities such as Baghdad and Basra. Dates of major events, reigns, and other important developments are provided in both the Islamic (hijrī) and the Gregorian calendars with a slash separating the two numbers. The following is a list of the most frequently used abbreviations: b.=ibn (son of) r.=reigned d.=died lit.=literally pl.=plural sg.=singular EI2=Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition viii Chapter 1: Introduction This dissertation aims to investigate competing frameworks of knowledge in early Islamic Mesopotamia (60–193 AH/680–809 CE) and their contributions to advancing different visions of social order. The period under consideration constitutes the formative years of the transition of foreign (i.e., non-Arabian/non-Islamic), ancient knowledge to the young Muslim society. Foreign knowledge proved instrumental in enabling the Arab government to keep the conquered areas under its control and to tackle, albeit unsuccessfully, the problem of political legitimacy. It caused reaction, however, in the circles of religious scholars (‘ulamā’) who took issue with the social order associated with the expertise, administrative practices, and political wisdom that were transferred to Muslim society.
Recommended publications
  • University of Lo Ndo N Soas the Umayyad Caliphate 65-86
    UNIVERSITY OF LONDON SOAS THE UMAYYAD CALIPHATE 65-86/684-705 (A POLITICAL STUDY) by f Abd Al-Ameer 1 Abd Dixon Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philoso] August 1969 ProQuest Number: 10731674 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10731674 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 2. ABSTRACT This thesis is a political study of the Umayyad Caliphate during the reign of f Abd a I -M a lik ibn Marwan, 6 5 -8 6 /6 8 4 -7 0 5 . The first chapter deals with the po litical, social and religious background of ‘ Abd al-M alik, and relates this to his later policy on becoming caliph. Chapter II is devoted to the ‘ Alid opposition of the period, i.e . the revolt of al-Mukhtar ibn Abi ‘ Ubaid al-Thaqafi, and its nature, causes and consequences. The ‘ Asabiyya(tribal feuds), a dominant phenomenon of the Umayyad period, is examined in the third chapter. An attempt is made to throw light on its causes, and on the policies adopted by ‘ Abd al-M alik to contain it.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghewond, Armenian History, Arab History, Iranian History, Byzantine
    Ghewond's History Translator's Preface [i] Almost nothing is known about the life of Ghewond, author of the sole 8th century Armenian history describing the Arab domination. It has been suggested that he was born in the 730s in the village of Goght'n, received his clerical education and degree of vardapet (doctor of the Church) in the city of Dwin, and died in the latter part of the century. His History covers the period from ca. 632 to 788 and includes descriptions of the Arab invasions of Armenia in the mid 7th century, the wars fought by the caliphate against Byzantium and the Khazars, the settlement of Arab tribes in Asia Minor and the Caucasus, and the overthrow of the Umayyads, as well as information on Arab tax policies, the status of the Armenian Church, and the Armenian and Arab nobilities. Ghewond is considered a trustworthy historian. He correctly lists the caliphs and the lengths of their reigns, except for the reigns of the initial three caliphs. He correctly lists the names and reigns of the ostikans or Muslim governors of the newly-created administrative unit called Arminiya, which included Armenia, East Iberia/Georgia, and parts of Aghuania (Atrpatakan/Azerbaijan). He was a supporter of the ambitions of the Bagratid family and, according to the colophon at the end of his History, wrote under the patronage of Shapuh Bagratuni, son of Smbat sparapet (commander-in-chief), whose activities are recorded in the work. Ghewond's major source for the period of the Arab invasions (640-660s) was the 7th century historian Sebeos [see Sebeos' History, chapters 30-38].
    [Show full text]
  • In God's Path: the Arab Conquests and The
    In God’s Path Ancient Warfare and Civilization series editors richard alston robin waterfield In this series, leading historians offer compelling new narratives of the armed conflicts that shaped and reshaped the classical world, from the wars of Archaic Greece to the fall of the Roman Empire and the Arab conquests. Dividing the Spoils: The War for Alexander the Great’s Empire Robin Waterfield By the Spear: Philip II, Alexander the Great, and the Rise and Fall of the Macedonian Empire Ian Worthington Taken at the Flood: The Roman Conquest of Greece Robin Waterfield In God’s Path: The Arab Conquests and the Creation of an Islamic Empire Robert G. Hoyland In God’s Path The Arab Conquests and the Creation of an Islamic Empire Robert G. Hoyland 1 1 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 © Oxford University Press 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam, the Arabs and Umayyad Rulers According to Theophanes the Confessor’S Chronography
    http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.02.09 Studia Ceranea 2, 2012, p. 97–111 Błażej Cecota (Łódź) Islam, the Arabs and Umayyad Rulers According to Theophanes the Confessor’s Chronography The Chronicle of Theophanes is, as it has been known for decades, a very important source not only for the history of the Byzantine Empire, as it also includes a lot of information about the foreign states and tribes which were con- nected with it1. In this article I will try to analyse the account concerning Islam and the Arabs by this Byzantine author (bearing in mind the still discussed prob- lem of authorship, and above all, the matter of his oriental source[s], on which he relied and which he cited2). The chronicler’s view on Islam itself has been discussed at length by the modern scholars3, yet his attitude towards Arabs and Umayyad rulers seems equally noteworthy, even if sometimes sketchy, varied or indistinct. Therefore, I am going to make both these questions the primary subject of my considerations. 1 The bibliography on the subject of Theophanes and his work is enormous. The following papers should be listed here: A.S. Proudfoot, The Sources of Theophanes for the Heraclian Dynasty, B 44, 1974, p. 367–439; C. Mango, Who wrote the Chronicle of Theophanes?, ЗРВИ 18, 1978, p. 9–17; L.M. Whitby, The Great Chronographer and Theophanes, BMGS 8, 1982/1983, p. 1–20; O. Jurewicz, Historia literatury bizantyńskiej . Zarys, Wrocław 1984, p. 132–137; J.N. Ljubarskij, Concerning the Literary Technique of Theophanes the Confessor, Bsl 56, 1995, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Perkembangan Arsitektur Masjid Pada Masa Abdul Malik Ibn Marwan Dan Walid Ibn Abdul Malik Di Dinasti Umayyah (685-715 M)
    PERKEMBANGAN ARSITEKTUR MASJID PADA MASA ABDUL MALIK IBN MARWAN DAN WALID IBN ABDUL MALIK DI DINASTI UMAYYAH (685-715 M) SKRIPSI Diajukan Kepada Fakultas Adab dan Ilmu Budaya UIN Sunan Kalijaga untuk Memenuhi Syarat guna Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Humaniora (S.Hum) OLEH : Itsnawati Nurrohmah Saputri NIM: 11120082 JURUSAN SEJARAH DAN KEBUDAYAAN ISLAM FAKULTAS ADAB DAN ILMU BUDAYA UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA 2016 MOTTO Hidup adalah proses, Hidup adalah Belajar Tanpa ada batas umur, Tanpa ada batas tua Jatuh maka berdiri lagi, Kalah maka mencoba lagi Gagal, maka bangkit lagi “Never Give Up” Sampai Tuhan berkata “Waktunya Pulang” v PERSEMBAHAN Untuk: Almamaterku Fakultas Adab dan Ilmu Budaya UIN Sunan Kalijaga; Bapak, Ibu, Kakak, Adik dan seluruh keluargaku; Dan teman-temanku seperjuanganku. vi PERKEMBANGAN ARSITEKTUR MASJID PADA MASA ABDUL MALIK IBN MARWAN DAN WALID IBN ABDUL MALIK DI DINASTI UMAYYAH (685-715 M) ABSTRAK Ilmu dan seni merancang bangunan, kumpulan bangunan, struktur lain yang fungsional, dan dirancang berdasarkan kaidah estetika Islam. Kata Arsitektur berasal dari bahasa Yunani, yaitu architekton yang terbentuk dari dua kata, yakni arkhe yang bermakna asli, awal, otentik dan tektoo yang bermakna berdiri stabil dan kokoh. Seni bangunan (arsitektur) pada masa Dinasti Umayyah bertumpu pada bangunan sipil berupa kota-kota dan bagunan masjid-masjid. Pada masa Abdul Malik bin Marwan membangun Qubat as-Shkhrah/Dome of The Rock/Kubah Batu di Yerusalem, hingga saat ini menjadi salah satu monumen Islam terbesar. Pada masjid Kubah Batu gaya bangunan tercampur dari kebudayaan Bizantium dan Persia. Pada masa Walid bin Abdul Malik dibangun masjid agung yang terkenal yaitu “Masjid Damaskus”.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FIRES of NAXČAWAN in Search of Intercultural Transmission in Arabic, Armenian, Greek, and Syriac
    THE FIRES OF NAXČAWAN In Search of Intercultural Transmission in Arabic, Armenian, Greek, and Syriac Introduction Near the turn of the eighth century, Armenian nobles rebelled against Arab rule and turned to Byzantium to secure their independence. Muḥammad b. Marwān, the brother of the caliph ῾Abd al-Malik, responded and defeated the Greek forces in order to reclaim Armenia as a caliphal province. He told the Armenian nobles that he wanted to increase their stipends and under this pretext he gathered them in the churches of the province Vaspurakan in southern Armenia. He then ordered his forces to burn the churches down, immolating the Armenians as punishment for their rebellion. This event, “the year of the fire” as Khalīfa b. Khayyāṭ calls it, rever- berated through the Near East and today we have accounts of the fires in Arabic, Armenian, Syriac, and Greek, dating as early as the eighth century. These accounts exhibit substantial differences, though: the reigning caliph is either ῾Abd al-Malik or al-Walīd; the date is 696, 703, 704, or 705; the churches are in Xram or Khilāṭ/Xlat‘ and/or al-Nashawā/Naxčawan (modern: Naxçıvan); the victims are the Armenian nobles or maybe just their troops; and the names of the instigators and captives change, although Muḥammad b. Marwān remains as a constant thread. This article joins the search for intercultural transmission between the various literatures of the Near East by untangling the discrepancies between the different accounts about the fires in Naxčawan. The goal is not to determine which account best describes “what really happened,” though there are some details that we might forward as possibilities; instead, this article places each version into its proper context and ques- tions what we mean by reliability in texts about the Umayyad period.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam, Arabs and Umayyad Rulers According to Theophanes The
    http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2084-140X.02.09 Studia Ceranea 2, 2012, p. 97–111 Błażej Cecota (Łódź) Islam, the Arabs and Umayyad Rulers According to Theophanes the Confessor’s Chronography The Chronicle of Theophanes is, as it has been known for decades, a very important source not only for the history of the Byzantine Empire, as it also includes a lot of information about the foreign states and tribes which were con- nected with it1. In this article I will try to analyse the account concerning Islam and the Arabs by this Byzantine author (bearing in mind the still discussed prob- lem of authorship, and above all, the matter of his oriental source[s], on which he relied and which he cited2). The chronicler’s view on Islam itself has been discussed at length by the modern scholars3, yet his attitude towards Arabs and Umayyad rulers seems equally noteworthy, even if sometimes sketchy, varied or indistinct. Therefore, I am going to make both these questions the primary subject of my considerations. 1 The bibliography on the subject of Theophanes and his work is enormous. The following papers should be listed here: A.S. Proudfoot, The Sources of Theophanes for the Heraclian Dynasty, B 44, 1974, p. 367–439; C. Mango, Who wrote the Chronicle of Theophanes?, ЗРВИ 18, 1978, p. 9–17; L.M. Whitby, The Great Chronographer and Theophanes, BMGS 8, 1982/1983, p. 1–20; O. Jurewicz, Historia literatury bizantyńskiej . Zarys, Wrocław 1984, p. 132–137; J.N. Ljubarskij, Concerning the Literary Technique of Theophanes the Confessor, Bsl 56, 1995, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Readers Battalion in Abdul Rahman Bin Alashaath Army
    European Scientific Journal June 2015 edition vol.11, No.17 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 READERS BATTALION IN ABDUL RAHMAN BIN ALASHAATH ARMY Dr. Mohammad Sayah Al Essa Department of History, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Al-albayt University, Jordan Abstract Abdul Rahman bin Alashaath revolution was considered one of the most important and most dangerous revolutions in the Umayyad period, even though it was not doctrinal. This revolution started from the eastern borders of the Islamic state against Iraq. Wali Al-Hajjaj bn Yusuf Thaqafi rose up and took over from Al Khalifa Abdul Malik bin Marwan. What distinguishes this revolution share readers of the people of Iraq in addition to a large number of loyalists who were indignant by the economic and social conditions? Readers played an important role in the revolution and they were able to achieve many victories. However, Al-Hajjaj managed to defeat them at the Battle of Deir Al-jamajem and abolish their revolution. Keywords: Introduction Iraq had witnessed many revolutions and upheavals during Umayyad period. Abdul Rahman bin Alashaath revolution was considered (81-84hjeri / 700-703m) to be the most important and the most dangerous revolution. This took place especially after the time of succession of Abdul Malik bin Marwan (86 H / T 705 m). Thus, this revolution was specifically against Al- Hajjaj bin Yousef Al-Thaqafi (95 H / T 714 m) who was the Wali of Iraq. Historians and researchers expatiated on the analysis of this revolution and its causes. Thus, it began as a result of the personal ambition of its Leader, Abdulrahman bin Al-Ashaath.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab-Byzantine Relations Under the Umayyad Caliphate and South Caucasus
    International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 3, No. 1, January 2013 Arab-Byzantine Relations under the Umayyad Caliphate and South Caucasus Nani Gelovani horse and one slave. But at the same time, the caliph had to Abstract—From the 7th century began struggle between the surrender to the emperor half the tribute from Cyprus, Iberia Arab Caliphate and the Byzantine Empire for the rule in South (Kartli) and Armenia [1-5]. Caucasus (Soviet Transcaucasia). This struggle continued for a There does not seem to be any clear indication of how long long time with changeable success. A comparison of the evidence this arrangement remained in force in Armenia and Iberia, but of the various sources with historical facts already known and discussed earlier in historical literature enables in a number of in Cyprus the condominium provision remained in effect for cases to concretise or specify separate problems of the history of some two hundred and sixty years. the Caliphate and of Byzantium in the early period of their Before we examine the conditions of the peace treaty, it is interrelations. The 680s are one of the important periods in the necessary to precise, when it was concluded, as the data of the history of Caliphate-Byzantine relations in South Caucasus. The sources do not coincide with each other. paper discusses some questions of the title problem: the date of According to the evidence of Arab sources, the treaty was the Arab-Byzantine peace treaty, Arab-Byzantine Peace Agreements. These questions are discussed on the basis of a concluded in the year 69/688-89 or 70/689-90 [1], [6-7] and critical analysis of the evidence of various primary sources according to the Syrian sources in the year 997/685-86 [8-12].
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronicle of Seert
    OXFORD EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES General Editors Gillian Clark Andrew Louth This is an open access version of the publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] THE OXFORD EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES series includes scholarly volumes on the thought and history of the early Christian centuries. Covering a wide range of Greek, Latin, and Oriental sources, the books are of interest to theologians, ancient historians, and specialists in the classical and Jewish worlds. Titles in the series include: Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity Andrew Radde-Gallwitz (2009) The Asceticism of Isaac of Nineveh Patrik Hagman (2010) Palladius of Helenopolis The Origenist Advocate Demetrios S. Katos (2011) Origen and Scripture The Contours of the Exegetical Life Peter Martens (2012) Activity and Participation in Late Antique and Early Christian Thought Torstein Theodor Tollefsen (2012) Irenaeus of Lyons and the Theology of the Holy Spirit Anthony Briggman (2012) Apophasis and Pseudonymity in Dionysius the Areopagite “No Longer I” Charles M. Stang (2012) Memory in Augustine’s Theological Anthropology Paige E. Hochschild (2012) Orosius and the Rhetoric
    [Show full text]
  • Christians and Others in the Umayyad State Oi.Uchicago.Edu Ii
    oi.uchicago.edu oi.uchicago.edu Christians and Others in the Umayyad State oi.uchicago.edu ii ********** Late Antique and Medieval Islamic Near East (LAMINE) The new Oriental Institute series LAMINE aims to publish a variety of scholarly works, including monographs, edited volumes, critical text editions, translations, studies of corpora of documents — in short, any work that offers a significant contribution to understanding the Near East between roughly 200 and 1000 C.E. ********** oi.uchicago.edu iii Christians and Others in the Umayyad State edited by Antoine Borrut and Fred M. Donner with contributions by Antoine Borrut, Touraj Daryaee, Muriel Debié, Fred M. Donner, Sidney H. Griffith, Wadād al-Qāḍī, Milka Levy-Rubin, Suzanne Pinckney Stetkevych, Donald Whitcomb, and Luke Yarbrough 2016 LAMINE 1 LATE ANTIQUE AND MEDIEVAL ISLAMIC NEAR EAST • NUMBER 1 THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO CHICAGO, ILLINOIS oi.uchicago.edu iv Library of Congress Control Number: 2015956904 ISBN: 978-1-614910-31-2 © 2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2016. Printed in the United States of America. The Oriental Institute, Chicago THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LATE ANTIQUE AND MEDIEVAL ISLAMIC NEAR EAST • NUMBER 1 Series Editors Leslie Schramer and Thomas G. Urban with the assistance of Rebecca Cain With special thanks to Tasha Vorderstrasse. Cover Illustration St. John of Damascus, icon from Damascus, Syria (d. ca. 131/749). 19th century, attributed to Iconographer Ne’meh Naser Homsi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Damascus#/media/File: John_Damascus_%28arabic_icon%29.gif (accessed 1/21/2016) Printed by Thomson-Shore, Dexter, Michigan, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • As of AD 700, the Stasrt of the I8th Century, the Arab Empire (Umayyad
    The Power Configurations of the Central Civilization/ World System in the Eighth Century DAVID WILKINSON Department of Political Science University of California, Los Angeles [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper is the nineteenth in a series in which the political careers of civilizations/world systems receive snapshot codings of their overall power structures at feasible intervals. The narratives are produced by collating histories with large frames of reference. The codings are done using a nominal variable, polarity, with seven available values: nonpolarity, multipolarity, tripolarity, bipolarity, (nonhegemonic) unipolarity, hegemony and empire. Previous articles in the series have examined the Indic system 550 BC-AD 1800, the Far Eastern 1025 BC – AD 1850, the Southwest Asian c 2700 – 1500 BC, and the Northeast African c. 2625-1500 BC. The Northeast African and Southwest Asian systems and sequences merged c. 1500 BC to form the Central system. A previous article has coded this system from 1500 BC to 700 BC, and previous papers have examined the system from AD 800 to date. In the current paper, the Central system’s power structure is coded at 10-year intervals, AD 700-800. The system begins in a tripolar state, but becomes multipolar in this century. 1 The Power Configurations of the Central Civilization/ World System in the Eighth Century This paper is the nineteenth in a series in which the political careers of civilizations/world systems receive snapshot codings of their overall power structures at feasible intervals. The narratives are produced by collating histories with large frames of reference. The codings are done using a nominal variable, polarity, with seven available values: nonpolarity, multipolarity, tripolarity, bipolarity, (nonhegemonic) unipolarity, hegemony and empire.
    [Show full text]