DOCSLIB.ORG

The Effectiveness of Different Minimally Invasive Epiphysiodesis Techniques in the Management of Paediatric Leg Length Discrepancies: a Systematic Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Effectiveness of Different Minimally Invasive Epiphysiodesis Techniques in the Management of Paediatric Leg Length Discrepancies: a Systematic Review The Effectiveness of Different Minimally Invasive Epiphysiodesis Techniques in the Management of Paediatric Leg Length Discrepancies: A Systematic Review Dr Megan Cain Master of Clinical Science The Joanna Briggs Institute Faculty of Health Sciences The University of Adelaide, South Australia 18th November 2018 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 5 Declarations ..................................................................................................................... 6 Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 7 Dissertation structure ....................................................................................................... 9 List of abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 10 List of definitions ........................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................. 14 What is a leg length discrepancy? ............................................................................. 14 Causes of leg length discrepancies ............................................................................. 15 Leg length discrepancy classification ........................................................................ 16 Clinical assessment ..................................................................................................... 16 Radiological assessment of leg length discrepancies ................................................ 18 Consequences of leg length discrepancies ................................................................. 24 Impact on patients’ quality of life ............................................................................. 27 Predicting the magnitude of a leg length discrepancy ............................................. 27 Different techniques for predicting the magnitude of a leg length discrepancy .................... 29 Treatment of leg length discrepancies ...................................................................... 34 Non-operative ........................................................................................................................ 34 Shortening of the long limb ................................................................................................... 35 Lengthening of the short limb (distraction osteogenesis or callotasis) .................................. 36 History of epiphysiodesis ............................................................................................ 39 Types of epiphysiodesis .............................................................................................. 40 Phemister ............................................................................................................................... 40 Percutaneous drilling and curettage....................................................................................... 41 Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws ....................................................... 42 Physeal staples ...................................................................................................................... 45 Eight-Plates ........................................................................................................................... 46 Experimental and other epiphysiodesis techniques ............................................................... 47 Anatomy of epiphysiodesis ......................................................................................... 47 Methodological basis for the review .......................................................................... 49 Evidence-based medicine and the emergence of systematic reviews .................................... 49 Difference between a literature review and a systematic review ............................ 50 Why is a systematic review needed in this area? ..................................................... 51 Chapter 2: Systematic Review Methods ........................................................................ 52 Question synthesis ....................................................................................................... 52 Review objectives ........................................................................................................ 52 Inclusion criteria ......................................................................................................... 52 Population ............................................................................................................................. 53 Interventions .......................................................................................................................... 53 Outcomes............................................................................................................................... 53 2 Types of studies ........................................................................................................... 54 Date of publication time frame .............................................................................................. 54 Language of publications ...................................................................................................... 55 Search strategy ............................................................................................................ 55 Three-step search strategy ..................................................................................................... 55 Example of initial database search strategy in PubMed ........................................................ 56 Study selection ............................................................................................................. 56 Assessment of methodological quality .................................................................................. 57 Threshold for inclusion ......................................................................................................... 57 Agreement between co-reviewers ......................................................................................... 57 Data extraction ............................................................................................................ 57 Data synthesis .............................................................................................................. 58 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 58 Chapter 3: Results .......................................................................................................... 59 Primary and secondary objectives of this review..................................................... 59 Study inclusion process .............................................................................................. 59 Papers identified .................................................................................................................... 59 Title and abstract screening ................................................................................................... 59 Full text review ..................................................................................................................... 59 Included studies .......................................................................................................... 60 Assessment of methodological quality ....................................................................... 61 JBI levels of evidence .................................................................................................. 62 Description of included studies .................................................................................. 64 Demographics .............................................................................................................. 65 Percutaneous drilling and curettage....................................................................................... 65 Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws ....................................................... 66 eight-Plates ............................................................................................................................ 66 Staples ................................................................................................................................... 67 Overall ................................................................................................................................... 67 Findings of the review ................................................................................................ 68 Absolute leg length discrepancy at skeletal maturity .............................................. 68 Percutaneous drilling and curettage....................................................................................... 68 Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws ....................................................... 69 eight-Plates ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bates' Pocket Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking
    Lynn S. Bickley, MD, FACP Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine School of Medicine University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico Peter G. Szilagyi, MD, MPH Professor of Pediatrics Chief, Division of General Pediatrics University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry Rochester, New York Acquisitions Editor: Elizabeth Nieginski/Susan Rhyner Product Manager: Annette Ferran Editorial Assistant: Ashley Fischer Design Coordinator: Joan Wendt Art Director, Illustration: Brett MacNaughton Manufacturing Coordinator: Karin Duffield Indexer: Angie Allen Prepress Vendor: Aptara, Inc. 7th Edition Copyright © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Copyright © 2009 by Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Copyright © 2007, 2004, 2000 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Copyright © 1995, 1991 by J. B. Lippincott Company. All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including as photocopies or scanned-in or other electronic copies, or utilized by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the copyright owner, except for brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Materials appear- ing in this book prepared by individuals as part of their official duties as U.S. government employees are not covered by the above-mentioned copyright. To request permission, please contact Lippincott Williams & Wilkins at Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street, Philadelphia PA 19103, via email at [email protected] or via website at lww.com (products and services). 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in China Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bickley, Lynn S. Bates’ pocket guide to physical examination and history taking / Lynn S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Bone Age in Clinical Practice – Part 2
    Mini Review HORMONE Horm Res Paediatr 2011;76:10–16 Received: March 25, 2011 RESEARCH IN DOI: 10.1159/000329374 Accepted: May 16, 2011 PÆDIATRIC S Published online: June 21, 2011 The Use of Bone Age in Clinical Practice – Part 2 a d f e b David D. Martin Jan M. Wit Ze’ev Hochberg Rick R. van Rijn Oliver Fricke g h j c George Werther Noël Cameron Thomas Hertel Stefan A. Wudy i k a a Gary Butler Hans Henrik Thodberg Gerhard Binder Michael B. Ranke a b Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Children’s Hospital, Tübingen , Children’s Hospital, c University of Cologne, Cologne , and Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen , d e Germany; Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden , and Department of Radiology, f Emma Children’s Hospital/Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam , The Netherlands; Meyer Children’s g Hospital, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa , Israel; Department of Endocrinology, Royal Children’s Hospital h Parkville, Parkville, Vic. , Australia; Centre for Global Health and Human Development, Loughborough University, i Loughborough , and Institute of Child Health, University College London and University College London Hospital, j k London , UK; H.C. Andersen Children’s Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense , and Visiana, Holte , Denmark Key Words ness and cortical thickness should always be evaluated in -Skeletal maturity ؒ Bone age ؒ Tall stature ؒ relation to a child’s height and BA, especially around puber Precocious puberty ؒ Congenital adrenal hyperplasia ؒ ty. The use of skeletal maturity, assessed on a radiograph Bone mineral density alone to estimate chronological age for immigration author- ities or criminal courts is not recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewed at a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years (Maximum of 3 Years and 9 Months)
    J Orthopaed Traumatol (2012) 13 (Suppl 1):S57–S89 DOI 10.1007/s10195-012-0210-2 12 NOVEMBER 2012 In-Depth Oral Presentations and Oral Communications IN-DEPTH ORAL PRESENTATIONS achieve a stable synthesis and an early mobilization of the MP and IP joints. However, if a malunion is present, it has to be corrected sur- gically as soon as possible. AT05–HAND AND WRIST Radio-distal epiphysis fractures: treatment with angular stability Treatment of malunion of the proximal phalangeal fractures plate of latest generation of the hand R. Di Virgilio*, E. Coppari, E. Condarelli, M. Rendine V. Potenza*, S. Bisicchia, R. Caterini, A. Fichera, P. Farsetti, E. Ippolito (Rome, IT) Universita` di Roma Tor Vergata (Rome, IT) Introduction Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures of the upper limb and coincide with 17 % of all fractures treated in Introduction It is difficult to treat fractures of the phalanges of the emergency rooms. The incidence of these fractures is greater in hand because they can cause complications such as deformity and patients aged 6 to 10 years, and in those between 60 and 70 years. joint limitation with a reduction in the grasping function. The most In older patients the incidence is higher in females. In the articular frequent complications are malunion of the fracture and joint limi- fractures, displaced, dislocated and highly unstable is indicated tation. The greatest incidence of complications can be found in open internal fixation (ORIF) to restore the congruity of the joint transverse fractures of the base of the proximal phalanx, in articular surface, to restore the correct length of the radius, its inclination fractures, comminuted fractures, and in those associated with lesions and palmar tilt.
    [Show full text]
  • Knee Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures Version 1.0 Effective February 14, 2020
    CLINICAL GUIDELINES CMM-312: Knee Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures Version 1.0 Effective February 14, 2020 Clinical guidelines for medical necessity review of Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Services. © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All rights reserved. Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0 CMM-312: Knee Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures CMM-312.1: Definitions 3 CMM-312.2: General Guidelines 5 CMM-312.3: Indications and Non-Indications 5 CMM-312.4: Experimental, Investigational, or Unproven 15 CMM-312.5: Procedure (CPT®) Codes 16 CMM-312.6: Procedure (HCPCS) Codes 19 CMM-312.7: References 20 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ©2020 eviCore healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Page 2 of 25 400 Buckwalter Place Boulevard, Bluffton, SC 29910 (800) 918-8924 www.eviCore.com Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0 CMM -312.1: Definitions The Modified Outerbridge Classification is a system that has been developed for judging articular cartilage injury to the knee. This system allows delineation of varying areas of chondral pathology, based on the qualitative appearance of the cartilage surface, and can assist in identifying those injuries that are suitable for repair techniques. The characterization of cartilage in this system is as follows: Grade I – Softening with swelling Grade II – Fragmentation and fissuring less than one square centimeter (1 cm2) Grade III – Fragmentation and fissuring greater than one square centimeter
    [Show full text]
  • Pediatric Ankle Fractures
    CHAPTER 26 PEDIATRIC ANKLE FRACTURES Sofi e Pinney, DPM, MS INTRODUCTION stronger than both the physis and bone. As a result, there is a greater capacity for plastic deformation and less chance of The purpose of this review is to examine the current intra-articular fractures, joint dislocation, and ligamentous literature on pediatric ankle fractures. I will discuss the disruptions. However, ligamentous injury may be more anatomic considerations of a pediatric patient, how to common than originally believed (1). A case-control study evaluate and manage these fractures, and when to surgically by Zonfrillo et al found an association between an increased repair them. Surgical techniques and complications will be risk of athletic injury in obese children, and concluded a briefl y reviewed. higher body mass index risk factor for ankle sprains (4). Ankle fractures are the third most common fractures in Secondary ossifi cation centers are located in the children, after the fi nger and distal radial physeal fracture. epiphysis. The distal tibial ossifi cation center appears at 6-24 Approximately 20-30% of all pediatric fractures are ankle months of age and closes asymmetrically over an 18-month fractures. Most ankle fractures occur at 8-15 years old. The period fi rst central, then medial and posterior, with the peak injury age is 11-12 years, and is relatively uncommon anterolateral portion closing last at 15 and 17 years of age for under the age 5. This injury is more common in boys. females and males, respectively. The distal fi bula ossifi cation The most common cause of pediatric ankle fractures is a center appears at 9-24 months of age and closes 1-2 years rotational force, and is often seen in sports injuries associated after the distal tibial.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Musculoskeletal Codes
    Updated January 2018 Commercial Musculoskeletal Codes Investigational or Non-Covered Spine Surgery Pain Management Joint Surgery Codes associated with an Arthrogram CPT Description Commercial Notes Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous 22100 process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; cervical 22101 Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; thoracic 22102 Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; lumbar Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, 22103 lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; each additional segment (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without 22110 decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment;cervical Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without 22112 decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment; thoracic Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without 22114 decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment; lumbar each additional vertebral segment (list separately in addition to code 22116 for primary procedure) Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 22206 1 vertebral
    [Show full text]
  • Leg Length Discrepancy
    Gait and Posture 15 (2002) 195–206 www.elsevier.com/locate/gaitpost Review Leg length discrepancy Burke Gurney * Di6ision of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, Uni6ersity of New Mexico, Health Sciences and Ser6ices, Boule6ard 204, Albuquerque, NM 87131-5661, USA Received 22 August 2000; received in revised form 1 February 2001; accepted 16 April 2001 Abstract The role of leg length discrepancy (LLD) both as a biomechanical impediment and a predisposing factor for associated musculoskeletal disorders has been a source of controversy for some time. LLD has been implicated in affecting gait and running mechanics and economy, standing posture, postural sway, as well as increased incidence of scoliosis, low back pain, osteoarthritis of the hip and spine, aseptic loosening of hip prosthesis, and lower extremity stress fractures. Authors disagree on the extent (if any) to which LLD causes these problems, and what magnitude of LLD is necessary to generate these problems. This paper represents an overview of the classification and etiology of LLD, the controversy of several measurement and treatment protocols, and a consolidation of research addressing the role of LLD on standing posture, standing balance, gait, running, and various pathological conditions. Finally, this paper will attempt to generalize findings regarding indications of treatment for specific populations. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Leg length discrepancy; Low back pain; Osteoarthritis 1. Introduction LLD (FLLD) defined as those that are a result of altered mechanics of the lower extremities [12]. In addi- Limb length discrepancy, or anisomelia, is defined as tion, persons with LLD can be classified into two a condition in which paired limbs are noticeably un- categories, those who have had LLD since childhood, equal.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankle Injuries
    Pediatric Fractures of the Ankle Nicholas Frane DO Zucker/Hofstra School of Medicine Northwell Health Core Curriculum V5 Disclosure • Radiographic Images Courtesy of: Dr. Jon-Paul Dimauro M.D or Christopher D Souder, MD, unless otherwise specified Core Curriculum V5 Outline • Epidemiology • Anatomy • Classification • Assessment • Treatment • Outcomes Core Curriculum V5 Epidemiology • Distal tibial & fibular physeal injuries 25%-38% of all physeal fractures • Ankle is the 2nd most common site of physeal Injury in children • Most common mechanism of injury Sports • 58% of physeal ankle fractures occur during sports activities • M>F • Commonly seen in 8-15y/o Hynes D, O'Brien T. Growth disturbance lines after injury of the distal tibial physis. Their significance in prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:231–233 Zaricznyj B, Shattuck LJ, Mast TA, et al. Sports-related injuries in school-aged children. Am J Sports Med. 1980;8:318–324. Core Curriculum V5 Epidemiology Parikh SN, Mehlman CT. The Community Orthopaedic Surgeon Taking Trauma Call: Pediatric Ankle Fracture Pearls and Pitfalls. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31 Suppl 6:S27-S31. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001014 Spiegel P, et al. Epiphyseal fractures of the distal ends of the tibia and fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(8):1046-50. Core Curriculum V5 Anatomy • Ligamentous structures attach distal to the physis • Growth plate injury more likely than ligament failure secondary to tensile weakness in physis • Syndesmosis • Anterior Tibio-fibular ligament (AITFL) • Posterior Inferior Tibio-fibular
    [Show full text]
  • CMM-314: Hip Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures Version 1.0.2019
    CLINICAL GUIDELINES CMM-314: Hip Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures Version 1.0.2019 Clinical guidelines for medical necessity review of speech therapy services. © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All rights reserved. Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0.2019 CMM-314: Hip Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures CMM-314.1: Definitions 3 CMM-314.2: General Guidelines 4 CMM-314.3: Indications and Non-Indications 4 CMM-314.4 Experimental, Investigational, or Unproven 6 CMM-314.5: Procedure (CPT®) Codes 7 CMM-314.6: References 10 © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 13 400 Buckwalter Place Boulevard, Bluffton, SC 29910 • (800) 918-8924 www.eviCore.com Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0.2019 CMM-314.1: Definitions Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI) is an anatomical mismatch between the head of the femur and the acetabulum resulting in compression of the labrum or articular cartilage during flexion. The mismatch can arise from subtle morphologic alterations in the anatomy or orientation of the ball-and-socket components (for example, a bony prominence at the head-neck junction or acetabular over-coverage) with articular cartilage damage initially occurring from abutment of the femoral neck against the acetabular rim, typically at the anterosui per or aspect of the acetabulum. Although hip joints can possess the morphologic features of FAI without symptoms, FAI may become pathologic with repetitive movement and/or increased force on the hip joint. High-demand activities may also result in pathologic impingement in hips with normal morphology. s It ha been proposed that impingement with damage to the labrum and/or acetabulum is a causative factor in the development of hip osteoarthritis, and that as many as half of cases currently categorized as primary osteoarthritis may have an etiology of FAI.
    [Show full text]
  • Affecting Factors and Correction Ratio in Genu Valgum Or Varum Treated with Percutaneous Epiphysiodesis Using Transphyseal Screw
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Article Affecting Factors and Correction Ratio in Genu Valgum or Varum Treated with Percutaneous Epiphysiodesis Using Transphyseal Screws Si-Wook Lee * , Kyung-Jae Lee , Chul-Hyun Cho, Hee-Uk Ye, Chang-Jin Yon , Hyeong-Uk Choi, Young-Hun Kim and Kwang-Soon Song Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, 1035 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Korea; [email protected] (K.-J.L.); [email protected] (C.-H.C.); [email protected] (H.-U.Y.); [email protected] (C.-J.Y.); [email protected] (H.-U.C.); [email protected] (Y.-H.K.); [email protected] (K.-S.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-53-258-4771 Received: 30 November 2020; Accepted: 17 December 2020; Published: 18 December 2020 Abstract: This study evaluated the correction rates of idiopathic genu valgum or varum after percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS) and analyzed the affecting factors. A total of 35 children without underlying diseases were enrolled containing 64 physes (44 distal femoral (DT), 20 proximal tibial (PT)). Anatomic tibiofemoral angle (aTFA) and the mechanical axis deviation (MAD) were taken from teleroentgenograms before PETS surgery and screw removal. The correction rates of the valgus and varus deformities for patients treated with PETS were 1.146◦/month and 0.639◦/month using aTFA while using MAD showed rates of 4.884%/month and 3.094%/month. After aTFA (p < 0.001) and MAD (p < 0.001) analyses, the correction rate of DF was significantly faster than that of PT.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Analysis Plan
    ~ GILEAU STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PLAN Study Title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety ofTenofovir Alafenamide (fAF) versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (fDF)-containing Regimens in Subjects with Chmnic HBV Infection and Stage 2 or Greater Chronic Kidney Disease Who Have Received a Liver Transplant Name of Test Drug: Tenofovir Alafenamide (fAF) Study Number: GS-US-320-3912 Protocol Version (Date): Amendment 2 (28 March 2017) Analysis Type: Week 24 Analysis Plan Version: Version 1.0 Analysis Plan Date: 19 March 2018 ..._ ...... Analysis Plan Author(s): PD______ CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION TAF GS-US-320-3912 Statistical Analysis Plan – Week 24 Analysis Version 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................................................2 LIST OF IN-TEXT TABLES........................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................................................................5 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................8 1.1. Study Objectives ......................................................................................................................................8 1.2. Study Design ............................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Children with Lower Limb Length Inequality
    Children with lower limb length inequality The measurement of inequality. the timing of physiodesis and gait analysis H.I.H. Lampe ISBN 90-9010926-9 Although every effort has been made to accurately acknowledge sources of the photographs, in case of errors or omissions copyright holders arc invited to contact the author. Omslagontwcrp: Harald IH Lampe Druk: Haveka B.V., Alblasserdarn <!) All rights reserved. The publication of Ihis thesis was supported by: Stichling Onderwijs en Ondcrzoek OpJciding Orthopaedic Rotterdam, Stichting Anna-Fonds. Oudshoom B.V., West Meditec B.V., Ortamed B.Y .• Howmedica Nederland. Children with lower limb length inequality The measurement of inequality, the timing of physiodesis and gait analysis Kinderen met een beenlengteverschil Het meten van verschillen, het tijdstip van physiodese en gangbeeldanalyse. Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus Prof. dr P.W.C. Akkermans M.A. en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties. De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op woen,dag 17 december 1997 om 11.45 uur door Harald Ignatius Hubertus Lampe geboren te Rotterdam. Promotieconmussie: Promotores: Prof. dr B. van Linge Prof. dr ir C.J. Snijders Overige leden: Prof. dr M. Meradji Prof. dr H.J. Starn Prof. dr J.A.N. Verbaar Dr. B.A. Swierstra, tevens co-promotor voor mijn ouders en Jori.nne Contents Chapter 1. Limb length inequality, the problems facing patient and doctor. 9 Review of Ii/era/ure alld aims of /he studies 1.0 Introduction 11 1.1 Etiology, developmental patterns and prediction of LLI 1.1.1 Etiology and developmental pattern 13 I.
    [Show full text]