Novel biological functions of apolipoprotein-E
David Anthony Elliott
Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
Faculty of Medicine,
University of New South Wales
May, 2009
To my parents Judy & Ray Elliott
II
ORIGINALITY STATEMENT
‘I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.’
Signed ……………………………………………......
Date ……………………………………………......
SUPERVISOR STATEMENT
I hereby certify that all co-authors of the published or submitted papers agree to David Elliott submitting those papers as part of his Doctoral Thesis.
Signed ……………………………………………...... Dr Brett Garner
Date ……………………………………………......
III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor Brett Garner for his much appreciated support and encouragement throughout my candidature. I am also very grateful to my co-supervisor Woojin-Scott Kim for all of his support and assistance.
I would also like to extend my appreciation to the rest of my colleagues within the
Garner Group, the Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute and the Centre for
Vascular Research for their technical advice and, more importantly, for being a great bunch of people to work with.
Special thanks to Kayan Tsoi and Sandra Holinkova for assistance in running western blots, Glenda Halliday for provision of human tissue samples and David Jans for expert advice.
I am deeply grateful to my father, Ray, and girlfriend, Meagan, for the tremendous amount of love, support and encouragement they haven given to me throughout my candidature.
IV
ABSTRACT
ApoE is a polymorphic protein that has been found to play many different roles in biological processes including lipid transport, neurobiology and immunoregulation.
ApoE occurs in the human population in three major isoforms; apoE2, apoE3 and apoE4. The apoE4 isoform has been identified as a major risk factor for several diseases including atherosclerosis and Alzheimer’s Disease, therefore a greater understanding of apoE biology is highly sought after. In my thesis, I have investigated several novel aspects of apoE biology. I have identified an association between increased apoE expression and apoptosis in a neuronal cell type and demonstrated that apoE becomes enriched within the neuronal apoptotic debris, consistent with a possible role for apoE in facilitating apoptotic debris clearance. A possible anti-apoptotic role of apoE in macrophages was assessed by reducing or eliminating apoE expression using siRNA and cells isolated from apoE knockout animals, respectively. The removal of apoE did not alter overall sensitivity to apoptosis, however, it did significantly increase staurosporine-induced caspase-3 activation. In other studies, the poorly understood accumulation of apoE within the nucleus was found to be enhanced during serum starvation and to localise in intra-nuclear structures that are distinct from inter- chromatin granule clusters. Analysis of apoE within the human brain revealed a correlation between fragmentation and the apoE3 isoform which was independent from
AD status and brain region examined. Additionally, a portion of brain apoE3 was found to be present in the form of disulphide-linked dimers. Collectively, these studies have further expanded the current knowledge of apoE biology in terms of its association with apoptosis, nuclear localization and structural differences between the apoE3 and apoE4 isoforms in the human brain.
V
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Originality statement ...……………………………………………………. III
Acknowledgements .………………………………………………………. IV
Abstract …………….…………….…………….…………………………... V
Publications arising from this thesis ……...………….………………….… IX
Journal articles ……….…………………...………….………………….… IX
Conference abstracts ……...………………………….………………….… IX
Oral presentations ………………...………….………………….… IX
Poster presentations ………………..………….………………….… X
Abbreviations ……...………….…………………………..…………….… XII
1. INTRODUCTION …………………………………………….…………. 1
1.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO APOLIPOPROTEIN-E ……………. 1
1.1.1 Structure ……………………………………………………………..… 1
1.1.2 Regulation of apoE …………………………………………………..… 5
1.1.2.1 Cellular expression …………………………………………….…..… 5
1.1.2.2 Intracellular transport and processing ………………….…………….. 5
1.1.2.3 Transcriptional regulation …………………………………...……..… 7
1.1.3 ApoE is a multifunctional protein ………………………………..…..… 8
1.1.3.1 Lipid transport ………………………………………….…………..… 8
1.1.3.2 Immunomodulation ………………………………………………..… 11
1.1.3.3 Receptor interactions ………………………………………………… 14
1.2 ApoE AND MACROPHAGE BIOLOGY ……………………………..… 18
1.2.1 The macrophage ……………………………………………………...… 18
VI
1.2.2 Atherosclerosis ………………………………………..……………...… 19
1.3 ASSOCIATION OF apoE WITH APOPTOSIS ………………………..... 20
1.3.1 Introduction to apoptosis …………………………………….………..... 20
1.3.2 A role of apoE in apoptosis? ………………………………………….... 25
1.4 ROLE OF apoE IN NEUROBIOLOGY ………………………...... 26
1.4.1 CNS lipid transport ……………………………………….…...... 26
1.4.2 Cognitive function ………………………...... 27
1.4.3 Role in nerve regeneration and repair ………………………...... 28
1.4.4 Neuronal expression of apoE ………………….……………...... 28
1.5 ApoE AND ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE ……...………………...... 30
1.5.1 Alzheimer’s disease background ……………………………...... 30
1.5.2 Generation of amyloid plaques …………………...…………...... 32
1.5.3 Alzheimer’s disease risk factors ………………………...... 35
1.5.3.1 Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease ………………………...... 35
1.5.3.2 Late-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease ………………….………...... 35
1.5.4 ApoE in the Alzheimer’s Disease brain ………….…………...... 36
1.5.4.1 ApoE levels in the AD brain ………………………...... 36
1.5.4.2 Interactions with amyloid beta ……………………………...... 38
1.5.4.3 Role of apoE in Neurofibrillary Tangle formation …………………... 41
1.5.4.4 Proteolysis of apoE ………………………………………………….. 41
VII
2. AIMS OF THIS THESIS ……………………………………………….. 44
3. RESULTS ………………………………….…………………………….. 45
3.1 RESULTS SUMMARY ………………………………………………… 45
3.2 PUBLICATIONS ……………………………………………………..… 48
3.2.1 Publication I …………………………………………………...……… 48
3.2.2 Publication II ………………………………………………………..… 54
3.2.3 Publication III ………………………………………………….……… 64
3.2.4 Publication IV ……………………………………………….………… 74
4. GENERAL DISCUSSION …………………………………………….. 128
4.1 POSSIBLE ROLES OF apoE IN APOPTOSIS ……………………….. 128
4.1.1 Cell survival …………………………………………………………. 128
4.1.2 Clearance of apoptotic debris ……………………………………….. 130
4.2 NUCLEAR TRAFFICKING OF apoE ……………….……………….. 131
4.3 STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN apoE ISOFORMS
IN THE HUMAN BRAIN …………………………………..…..…….. 132
4.3.1 Fragmentation of apoE3 in the human brain ……………….……….. 133
4.3.2 Mechanism of apoE proteolysis in the brain ………………………... 136
4.3.3 Biological function of apoE fragments? …………………………….. 138
4.3.4 ApoE disulfide linked dimers ……………………………………….. 139
5. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS ……………………………………………. 141
6. REFERENCES ………………………………………………..………. 142
VIII
PUBLICATIONS ARISING FROM THIS THESIS
Journal articles
1. David A. Elliott, Woojin S. Kim, David A. Jans and Brett Garner. (2007) Apoptosis induces neuronal apolipoprotein-E synthesis and localization in apoptotic bodies.
Neuroscience Letters 416: 206-210.
2. David A. Elliott, Woojin S. Kim, David A. Jans and Brett Garner. (2008)
Macrophage apolipoprotein-E knockdown modulates caspase-3 activation without altering sensitivity to apoptosis. Biochimica et Biophysica acta 1780:145-53.
3. Woojin S. Kim , David A. Elliott , Maaike Kockx, Leonard Kritharides, Kerry-Anne
Rye, David A. Jans and Brett Garner. (2008) Analysis of apolipoprotein-E nuclear localization using green fluorescent protein and biotinylation approaches. The
Biochemical Journal 409: 701-9.
4. David A. Elliott, Kayan Tsoi, Sandra Holinkova, Sharon L. Chan, Woojin S. Kim,
Glenda M. Halliday, Kerry-Anne Rye, David A. Jans and Brett Garner. Isoform- specific processing of apolipoprotein-E in the human brain. Revised manuscript accepted for publication in Neurobiology of Aging, February 2009. Currently in print.
Conference abstracts
Oral presentations:
1. Elliott, D. A. ‘Isoform-specific processing of apoE in the human brain’ Kioloa
Neuroscience Colloquium, April 2008.
IX
2. Elliott, D. A., Kim, W. S. and Garner, B. ‘Exploring the potential role of apolipoprotein-E in apoptosis’ Dementia, Ageing and Neurodegeneration DISeases
Group (DANDIS) conference held at the Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute,
January 2006.
Poster presentations:
3. Elliott, D. A., Kim, W. S. and Garner, B. ‘Post-translational modifications of apolipoprotein-E in the human brain’ International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease,
Chicago, USA, July 2008.
4. Elliott, D. A., Kim, W. S. and Garner, B. ‘Post-translational modifications of apolipoprotein-E in the human brain’ Australian Neuroscience Society 28th Annual
Meeting, Hobart, January 2008.
5. Elliott, D. A., Kim, W. S. and Garner, B. ‘Potential role of apolipoprotein-E in clearance of apoptotic debris’ 37th Annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San
Diego, USA, November 2007.
6. Elliott, D. A., Kim, W. S. and Garner, B. ‘Exploring the potential role of apolipoprotein-E in apoptosis’ Australian Society for Medical Research NSW Scientific
Conference, Sydney, June 2006.
X
7. Elliott, D. A., Kim, W. S. and Garner, B. (2006) ‘What is the role of apolipoprotein-
E in apoptosis?’ Australian Neuroscience Society 26th Annual Meeting, Sydney, Jan-
Feb 2006.
8. Elliott, D. A., Kim, W. S., Quinn, C. M., Kritharides, L., Kockx, M. and Garner, B.
‘Exploring the potential role of apolipoprotein-E in apoptosis’ Australian Vascular
Biology Society Meeting, Sydney, August 2005.
XI
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS aa amino acid
A amyloid
Ab Antibody
AD Alzheimer's Disease AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
AIF apoptosis inducing factor
Apaf1 activating protease-activating factor 1
APC Antigen Presenting Cells apoA1 apolipoprotein-A1 apoA-II apolipoprotein-A2 apoB100 apolipoprotein-B100 apoE apolipoprotein-E apoER2 apoE receptor 2 apoD apolipoprotein-D apoJ apolipoprotein-J
APP amyloid precursor protein
BACE1 -site amyloid precursor protein cleavage enzyme 1
BBB blood brain barrier
BCA bicinchoninic acid
BSA bovine serum albumin
CatD Cathepsin D
CCM cell-conditioned medium
CHO Chinese hamster ovary
CNS Central Nervous System
CON Control
XII
CSF Cerebrospinal Fluid
Cys cysteine cyt c cytochrome c
DD death domains
DED death effector domain
EGF epidermal growth factor
Endo G endonuclease G
EOAD Early-onset Alzheimer’s Disease
Front Frontal cortex gHCl guanidine hydrochloride
GFP green fluorescent protein
Glu glutamate
GSL glycosphingolipids
HDL high density lipoprotein
Hippo Hippocampus
HI-Thr heat inactivated thrombin
HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus
HSPG heparan sulfate proteoglycan
HSV Herpes Simplex Virus
IAP inhibitor of apoptosis protein
IDE insulin degrading enzyme
Il-6 interleukin 6
LBD lipid binding domain
LDLR low-density lipoprotein receptor
LOAD Late-onset Alzheimer’s Disease
XIII
LRP LDLr-related protein
LXR Liver X Receptor mAb monoclonal antibody
M-CSF Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor
MED1 multiple start site element downstream 1
MEGF7 multiple EGF repeat-containing protein min minutes
MMP-14 matrix metalloproteinase-14 mRNA messenger RNA
NEP neprilysin
NF B nuclear factor kappa B
NFT neurofibrillary tangles
NLS nuclear localization sequence
NR non-reduced
Occip Occipital lobe
PAGE polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
PARP poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase
PBS Phosphate Buffered Saline
PD Parkinson’s Disease
PHF paired helical filaments
POPC 1-palmitoyl-2-oleylphosphatidyl choline
PS phosphatidyl serine
PS presenilin
R reduced
RBD receptor binding domain
XIV
RXR Retinoid X Receptor sAPP soluble APP sAPP soluble APP
SDS Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate
SDS-PAGE Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Electrophoresis
Ser serine siRNA short interfering RNA sLDLR soluble LDLR
SM sphingomyelins
SP signal peptide
STAT1 signal transducer and activator of transcription 1
STAT2 signal transducer and activator of transcription 2
TBI traumatic brain injury
TBS Tris Buffered Saline
TBS-X Tris Buffered Saline and Triton X-100
TF transcription factor
Thr Thrombin
Thr threonine
TNFR tumour necrosis factor receptor
U units
VLDL very low-density lipoprotein
VLDLR very low-density lipoprotein receptor
XV
1. INTRODUCTION
1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO APOLIPOPROTEIN-E
1.1.1 Structure
Apolipoprotein-E (apoE) is a 299 amino acid (aa) (~34 kDa) protein that was first identified in the 1970’s as a constituent of plasma lipoproteins (Shore & Shore 1973,
Mahley 1988). It is encoded by the APOE gene located on chromosome 19 and is a member of the apolipoprotein multigene family (Li et al. 1988).
ApoE consists of 2 major domains, N-terminus 1-191aa and C-terminus 216-299aa, separated by a flexible ‘hinge’ region (Figure 1) (Aggerbeck et al. 1988, Wetterau et al. 1988). The N-terminal domain consists of 4 alpha-helix bundles and contains a region, residues 136-150, that is enriched in the basic amino acids arginine (Arg) and lysine (Lys). This region is termed the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) and is involved in binding with heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) and a range of receptors
(discussed below). The C-terminal domain consists of amphipathic -helices which are responsible for the lipid-binding capability of apoE and are a common feature of all apolipoprotein family members. (Li et al. 1988). Residues 244-272 are most crucial to lipid binding and are thus referred to as the lipoprotein-binding domain (LBD). These two specialised domains enable apoE to be highly effective at binding lipids and controlling their transport and metabolism in a regulated manner.
ApoE occurs in the human population as three common isoforms apoE2, apoE3 and apoE4 which differ in their cysteine (Cys) and Arg composition at residues 112 and
158. ApoE2 contains Cys112, Cys158; apoE3 contains Cys112, Arg158; and apoE4 contains
Arg112, Arg158 (Figure 1) (Rall et al. 1982). The Cys residues present in apoE2 and
1
Figure 1.
Model of the apoE protein highlighting; N-terminal (1-191aa) and C-terminal (216-
299) domains; receptor binding domain (136-150); lipid binding domain (244-272); polymorphic sites at amino acids 112 and 158; the major thrombin cleavage site; O- linked glycosylation site, O-glycan; phosphorylation site, PO4. (Adapted from
Weisgraber et al., 1996).
2 apoE3 represent the only Cys residues present in the whole apoE protein, thus apoE4 is completely devoid of Cys. The frequency of the different APOE alleles in western populations is; 3 ~77%, 4 ~15% and 2 ~8%. This can vary across different human populations, however, 3 is consistently the most common (reviewed in (Mahley & Rall
2000)).
Several structural differences exist between the apoE isoforms. The presence of Arg112 in E4 disrupts the ionic association between Glu109 and Arg61, leaving Arg61 free to associate with Glu255. This leads to inter-domain interaction and a reduction in the lipid- binding capacity of apoE4. In apoE3 and apoE4 a salt-bridge bond exists between
Arg158 and Asp154. This is eliminated by substitution of Cys158 in apoE2, resulting in the formation of a salt-bridge between asp154 and arg150 which pulls the positively charged side-chain of arginine150 away from the RBD. This impairs the ability of apoE2 to interact with certain receptors (discussed below) (Figure 2). In addition, apoE4 is unable to form disulphide-linked bonds with other proteins due to its lack of a Cys residue. It has also been shown using chemical and thermal denaturation techniques that apoE4 is structurally less stable when compared to apoE3 (Morrow et al. 2000,
Clement-Collin et al. 2006).
The structure of apoE can also be altered by post-translational modifications.
Carbohydrate molecules can be attached to Thr194 via O-linked glycosylation (Zannis et al. 1986, Wernette-Hammond et al. 1989) and apoE contains a phosphorylation site at
Ser296 (Raftery et al. 2005). Also, the hinge region of apoE is susceptible to cleavage by proteolytic enzymes (refer to Figure 1) {Wetterau, 1988
3
Figure 2.
A) Schematic diagram highlighting the domain interaction that occurs with apoE4, but not apoE3. Arg112 in apoE4 disrupts the ionic association between Glu109 and Arg61, leaving Arg61 free to associate with Glu255. (Adapted from Mahley et al., 2006). B)
Three-dimensional model highlighting structural differences between the apoE3 and apoE2 isoforms. Boxed area represents the RBD. The salt bridge that exists between
Arg158 and Asp154 in apoE3 is disrupted by the Cys158 substitution in apoE2, leading to an ionic interaction between Asp154 and Arg150 which pulls Arg150 away from the
RBD. (Adapted from Mahley et al., 2000).
4 #71}. Stable fragments of apoE have also been detected in the human brain and this is discussed in more detail below.
1.1.2 Regulation of apoE
1.1.2.1 Cellular expression
ApoE expression has been reported in most tissues of the body, primarily the liver, brain and to a lesser extent in spleen, skin, ovaries, adrenal glands, lungs, kidney and muscle (Mahley 1988, Elshourbagy et al. 1985, Blue et al. 1983, Lin et al. 1986,
Driscoll & Getz 1984). The liver produces approximately 70% of the total apoE in the body, with the majority of this secreted into the plasma where it plays an important role in lipid transport. Hepatocytes and macrophages are a major source of apoE in the circulation and peripheral tissues (Mahley 1988). Astrocytes are the primary source of apoE in the brain, however, apoE is also expressed by oligodendrocytes, ependymal layer cells, microglia and, under certain physiological circumstances, in neurons (Bao et al. 1996, Diedrich et al. 1991, Han et al. 1994b, Ignatius et al. 1986, Metzger et al.
1996, Nakai et al. 1996, Nathan et al. 1994, Poirier et al. 1991, Xu et al. 2006).
1.1.2.2 Intracellular transport and processing
ApoE is translated as a 317aa protein containing an N-terminal 18aa signal peptide (SP) which is a characteristic feature of proteins destined for secretion. The SP directs apoE to the endoplasmic reticulum where the SP is cleaved, producing the 299aa apoE protein, which is then transported to the Golgi where it can undergo O-linked glycosylation before being either excreted, stored within the cell or degraded in the lysosome (Zannis et al. 1984, Zannis et al. 1986). Approximately 92% of apoE secreted by macrophages is glycosylated, compared to ~42% of intracellular and ~24% of
5 plasma apoE (Zannis et al. 1986). Interestingly, ablation of the Thr194 glycosylation site does not impair secretion, thus the significance of apoE glycosylation is currently unclear (Wernette-Hammond et al. 1989). Prior to excretion, apoE may reside at the cell surface in a storage pool with a relatively long turnover time (Zhao & Mazzone 2000).
The stability of apoE in this pool is mediated by binding to cell surface HSPG which can modulate both the rate of secretion and intracellular reuptake of apoE (Lucas &
Mazzone 1996, Ji et al. 1998). ApoE in this pool may also undergo recycling back to the Golgi for glycosylation prior to secretion. Exogenous apoE, complexed with lipid in lipoprotein particles, can also be endocytosed via receptor mediated interactions
(discussed in detail below), resulting in the delivery of lipids to the cell and either lysosomal degradation or recycling of apoE to the cell surface (Farkas et al. 2004, Fazio et al. 1999, Heeren et al. 2001). Alternatively, both exogenous and endogenous apoE can reside in intracellular vesicles that share features in common with lysosomes but do not result in protein degradation (also known as late endosomes and late lysosomes)
(Dekroon & Armati 2001, Dekroon & Armati 2002a, Ljungberg et al. 2003, Tabas et al.
1990, Tabas et al. 1991). These vesicles serve as intracellular storage pools whereby apoE can be bidirectionally transported to and from the cell surface.
The proportion of apoE that is stored in each cellular compartment or destined for degradation or secretion can vary depending on cell type (Mazzone et al. 1992, Duan et al. 1997, Fazio et al. 1999), lipoprotein profile of exogenous apoE (DeKroon & Armati
2001, Tabas et al. 1990, Tabas et al. 1991, Ljungberg et al. 2003) and a wide range of extrinsic cellular factors such as cytokines, fatty acids and growth factors (Dekroon &
Armati 2002b, Tedla et al. 2004, Quinn et al. 2004, Werb & Chin 1983, Werb et al.
1989, Zhao et al. 2002, Rensen et al. 2000). Steady state apoE concentration is
6 influenced by isoform differences with apoE4 being more susceptible to lysosomal degradation and less efficient at HSPG mediated endocytosis (DeKroon & Armati 2001,
Ji et al. 1998). Targeted replacement studies in mice have shown apoE4 is more rapidly turned over than apoE3 (Riddell et al. 2008).
Interestingly, there is evidence that a small pool of apoE can localize to the nucleus in hepatocytes, macrophages and ovarian cancer cells, however, the functional significance of this is not understood (Quinn et al. 2004, Chen et al. 2005, Panin et al.
2000).
1.1.2.3 Transcriptional regulation
The upstream promoter region of the APOE gene is known to contain several regulatory regions that can bind a variety of different transcription factors (TFs) (Chang et al.
1990, Adroer et al. 1997, Laffitte et al. 2001, Salero et al. 2003, Lahiri 2004, Du et al.
2005, Naukkarinen et al. 2005, Ramos et al. 2005). One of the most well characterised mechanisms of APOE upregulation is mediated by the Liver X Receptors (LXRs) and
Retinoid X Receptors (RXRs), usually in response to increased levels of cellular cholesterol (Laffitte et al. 2001). LXR and RXR are members of a large family of transcription factor proteins known as nuclear receptors which are regulated by binding various ligands. LXRs are regulated by oxidized forms of cholesterol, known as oxysterols, and intermediate products produced during cholesterol synthesis (Janowski et al. 1996, Janowski et al. 1999). RXRs are regulated by 9-cis-retinoic acid and polyunsaturated fatty acids (Heyman et al. 1992, Bourguet et al. 2000). LXR and RXR proteins form heterodimers which, upon ligand binding, control expression of target genes via interaction with specific LXR response elements present in the gene promoter
7 region of APOE (Laffitte et al. 2001) and several other genes, such as ABCA1 and
ABCG1, which play a role in cholesterol efflux and lipidation of apoE (Repa et al.
2000) (Venkateswaran et al. 2000a, Venkateswaran et al. 2000b).
Interestingly, the APOE regulatory region also contains binding sites for the anti- apoptotic TF nuclear factor kappa B (NF B) (Du et al. 2005) and several inflammatory response associated TFs interleukin 6 (Il-6), Il-6 responsive element-binding protein, multiple start site element downstream 1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 2 (reviewed in
(Lahiri 2004)).
1.1.3 ApoE is a multifunctional protein
1.1.3.1 Lipid transport
ApoE was first identified as a constituent of plasma lipoprotein particles where it plays a role in facilitating the transport and cellular uptake of lipids throughout the body
(Shore & Shore 1973, Mahley 1988). ApoE associates with chylomicron particles that are derived from the intestines and contain dietary lipids. The delivery of these lipids to the liver is mediated by apoE binding to receptor molecules present on the surface of hepatocytes, primarily the low density lipoprtoein receptor related protein (LRP) which is facilitated by binding with HSPG (Innerarity & Mahley 1978, Mahley & Ji 1999).
ApoE is also secreted from the liver in association with triglyceride rich very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) which, along with apoE containing chylomicron remnants, delivers lipids to the extra-hepatic cells of the body by either receptor-mediated uptake or hydrolysis by lipoprotein lipase which results in the liberation of free fatty acids
(Figure 3). The apolipoprotein apoB100 also plays a major role in this process. ApoE is
8
Figure 3.
Basic overview highlighting the role of apoE in lipoprotein metabolism. ApoE associates with several lipoproteins to facilitate lipid transport and delivery to cells mediated by receptor interactions; apoE-chylomicrons transport dietary lipids from the intestine to the liver via chylocmicron particles; apoE-VLDL/IDL/LDL transports lipids from the liver to peripheral cells (eg. macrophages); apoE-HDL participates in the reverse-transport of cholesterol to the liver where it can then be secreted from the body in the form of bile salts.
9 also involved in the transport of cholesterol from peripheral macrophages back to the liver where it can be eliminated from the body via bile salts, which contributes to a process commonly known as reverse cholesterol transport. In this process cholesterol is packaged in high density lipoprotein (HDL) particles. ApoE is not essential in this process, however, it does greatly enhance the cholesterol binding capacity of HDL
(Gordon et al. 1983, Koo et al. 1985) (Huang et al. 1994, Mahley & Innerarity 1983).
The primary apolipoprotein in HDL is apoA1 which delivers cholesterol to the liver via the SR-B1 receptor. The transfer of lipids from hepatocytes and macrophages to lipoprotein particles is facilitated by membrane transport proteins, particularly ABCA1 and ABCG1 (Jessup et al. 2006). ApoE also mediates the redistribution of lipids between cells within tissue, a well characterized example being in peripheral nerve regeneration (discussed below in section 1.4.3).
The differences between apoE isoforms can have variable effects on lipoprotein metabolism. The affinity of apoE2 for the LDL receptor (LDLR) is relatively weak, being ~2% that of apoE3 and apoE4 (Schneider et al. 1981, Weisgraber et al. 1982).
This results in apoE2 homozygous individuals being susceptible to the lipoprotein disorder type III hyperlipoproteinemia (Mahley et al. 1999). Population studies have revealed that apoE4 is associated with increased levels of total cholesterol and LDL
(Utermann et al. 1984, Utermann 1987). The underlying mechanism responsible for this is not entirely understood, however, it may be related to the fact that apoE4 displays preferential binding to triglyceride rich lipoproteins such as VLDL, whereas apoE2 and apoE3 display preferential binding with HDL (Steinmetz et al. 1989, Utermann 1987,
Weisgraber 1990). Also, it has been suggested that apoE4 may alter the rate at which dietary fats are catabolised, leading to down-regulation of LDLR and thus increased
10 plasma LDL and cholesterol levels (Gregg et al. 1986). This property of E4 may be a factor in the increased incidence of heart disease associated with this allele (Davignon et al. 1988, Menzel et al. 1983, Stengard et al. 1995).
ApoE is involved in a diverse range of biological processes beyond lipoprotein metabolism and the different isoforms have been associated with modifying the risk of developing several diseases (Table 1).
1.1.3.2 Immunomodulation
It is now well established that apoE possesses potent immunomodulatory properties, with several studies attributing anti-inflammatory properties to apoE and isoform differences being associated with altering the virulence of certain pathogens. Evidence for this arose from studies showing that LDL particles could either promote or inhibit the proliferation and activation of T lymphocytes, an event which is important for mounting an immune response (Cuthbert & Lipsky 1984b, Cuthbert & Lipsky 1986).
The stimulation of proliferation is dependent on the delivery of fatty acids to the cell via the LDLR. In contrast, the inhibitory effect is not associated with LDLR interaction or the delivery of lipids to the cell. Interaction with another receptor, or group of receptors, is responsible for this effect, with the transferrin receptor and cell surface HSPG being possible candidates (Hui & Harmony 1980b, Hui & Harmony 1980a, Cuthbert &
Lipsky 1984b, Cuthbert & Lipsky 1984a). The component of LDL responsible for conferring the inhibitory effect is apoE (Hui et al. 1980, Curtiss & Edgington 1976,
Curtiss & Edgington 1981), more specifically, the RBD region within apoE.
11
'% ! &!"!!! !
!! # $ " ! " # $$% ! & %% '(" ))) (" ! & %% ' * + ,* ( '-) " * . $$/ 0 0 / ) " * + 12 3 % ! 4 4 ' 44 / "* ( +(" 5("6 + ,* ( 47 04 * $$$ 0" ,* ( " * . $$% 8 * ' $$9 * 4 " 34 $$% 5):;) 0 " -* $$% 50:8* " + ) / 8
12 In vitro studies have shown that mimetic peptides derived from the RBD (136-150) are sufficient to inhibit T cell activation (Clay et al. 1995, Cardin et al. 1988, Dyer et al.
1991). Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated that the RBD of apoE has potent anti-inflammatory effects on microglial cells (the primary immuno-regulators in the brain) and on systemic immune responses in mice (Lynch et al. 2003) (Lynch et al.
2005) (Laskowitz et al. 2001) (Li et al. 2006) (Singh et al. 2008). These effects are mediated, at least in part, by binding with members of the LDLR family. More specifically, in microglia this is dependent on VLDLR and LRP1, not LDLR
(Pocivavsek et al. 2008).
Other studies have revealed that apoE knockout (apoE-/-) in mice results in significantly enhanced inflammatory responses both basally and in response to inflammatory stimuli, with increased levels of several pro-inflammatory cytokines; tumor necrosis factor alpha, interferon gamma, IL-6, interleukin 12 and fibrinogen (Ali et al. 2005, Grainger et al. 2004, Laskowitz et al. 2000, Tenger & Zhou 2003, Mace et al. 2007). Also,
Antigen Presenting Cells (APC), such as macrophages isolated from apoE-/- mice, display increased levels of the cell surface co-stimulatory molecules CD40, CD80 and
MHC-II compared to wild type (WT) mice and this results in an enhanced capacity to stimulate T lymphocytes (Tenger & Zhou 2003).
There is evidence that apoE can modulate host susceptibility to various bacterial, viral and protozoan pathogens (Urosevic & Martins 2008). ApoE-/- mice are more susceptible to infection by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Listeria monocytogenes (de Bont et al. 1999, de Bont et al. 2000, Roselaar & Daugherty 1998). These differences appear to be unrelated to the hypercholesterolemia present in apoE-/- mice as they are not observed in
13
LDLR-/- mice, which are also hypercholesterolemic when fed a diet high in fat and cholesterol (Netea et al. 1996, Ishibashi et al. 1993). Differences in disease susceptibility exist between humans carrying different apoE isoforms. ApoE4 carriers are more susceptible to developing Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) induced herpes labialis (cold-sores) (Itzhaki et al. 1997, Burgos et al. 2002) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive 4/ 4 patients are afflicted with a more rapid disease progression (Burt et al. 2008). In vitro studies have also shown that cells are more easily infected by HIV when in the presence of apoE4 (Burt et al. 2008). HSV and
HIV both require interaction with cell surface HSPG to facilitate cell entry, thus it has been speculated that apoE interaction with HSPG disrupts this process (Herold et al.
1991). Further evidence for this comes from cell culture studies of HIV infection where apoE peptides, derived from the heparin binding/ RBD, inhibit HIV cellular attachment
(Dobson et al. 2006). The malaria protozoan also utilizes cell surface HSPG to gain entry into cells and there is evidence that apoE2 carrying individuals are more susceptible to infection (Wozniak et al. 2003).
1.1.3.3 Receptor interactions
The RBD of apoE enables binding with a range of receptors to mediate functions such as the delivery of lipids to cells and cellular signaling. ApoE binding partners are predominantly the LDL receptor family, but also include HSPG, transferrin receptor and the alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (Gay et al. 2007).
ApoE is a ligand for the seven members of the LDLR family in mammals: LDLR, Very
Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor (VLDLR), apoE receptor 2 (apoER2), multiple epidermal growth factor (EGF) repeat-containing protein (MEGF7), LRP, LRP1B and
14 megalin (also referred to as LRP2) (Beffert et al. 2004, Rebeck et al. 2006). This family of receptors share several common structural domains, including ligand-binding domains consisting of negatively charged cysteine-rich ligand-binding repeats (which bind the positively charged RBD of apoE), EGF homology domains with YMTD motifs
(propeller domains) and cytoplasmic domains containing at least one NPxY motif
(Figure 4). Some members of this family play a well established role in the endocytosis of lipids, as discussed earlier. However, ligand binding to these receptors can also mediate cell signaling pathways that regulate a variety of cellular/physiological responses ranging from the inflammatory response in microglia, migration of endothelial cells, neurite outgrowth, microtubule stabilisation, synaptic plasticity, calcium homeostasis and kinase activation (Beffert et al. 2002, Beffert et al. 2004, Hui
& Basford 2005). The cytoplasmic NPxY motif can link receptor binding with intracellular signaling by binding with adaptor proteins containing phosphtyrosine binding (PTB) domains, such as Disabled-1 (Dab1) (Howell et al. 1999, Trommsdorff et al. 1998). This leads to a cascade of intracellular signalling events which results in either the activation or deactivation of several key regulatory enzymes including cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), Protein Kinase A (PKA), extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (cJNK), Src family kinases, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), Akt and glycogen synthase kinase 3- (GSK-3 )
(Hoe et al. 2005, Hui & Basford 2005). The signaling pathways initiated by Reelin binding with apoER2 and VLDLR have been well studied and play an important role in microtubule organization and brain development (Hiesberger et al. 1999, Benhayon et al. 2003).
15
Figure 4.
Schematic representation of the seven LDLR family members in mammals. Common structural features are shown. (Reproduced from Beffert et al., 2004).
16 Soluble forms of the LDLR family (sLDLR), which consist of the extracellular domain detached from the cell surface, have been identified in vivo in the plasma and CSF. sLDLR are produced by either extracellular proteinases or alternate mRNA splicing
(Garcia-Touchard et al. 2005, Xing et al. 2003). The generation of sLDLR can be increased by ligand binding and phorbol esters (Hoe & Rebeck 2005). The ability of sLDLR to interact with ligands including apoE has been confirmed (Quinn et al. 1997,
Koch et al. 2002, Ronacher et al. 2000, Bajari et al. 2005, Yamamoto et al. 2008), however, the physiological role of these receptors has not yet been determined.
Physiological roles have been found for other transmembrane proteins that can release soluble extracellular domains, thus it seems highly likely that sLDLR may have analogous functions. These include, antagonizing membrane bound receptors by competing for ligand binding, regulating receptor population, inhibiting extracellular proteinases and modulating the activity of cytokines and growth factors (reviewed in
(Rebeck et al. 2006)).
ApoE binding to cell surface HSPG plays a role in the endocytosis of lipids and the transduction of cellular signals, which may be involved in the immunomodulatory responses discussed above. HSPG can also enhance LRP endocytosis of apoE by either forming a complex with LRP or entrapping apoE at the cell surface before transferring it to LRP for endocytosis (Mahley & Ji 1999).
The ability of apoE to interact with these receptors can vary due to isoform differences.
As mentioned above, apoE2 is ~98% less effective than apoE3 and apoE4 at binding the
LDLR. In contrast, the binding of apoE2 with LRP is equivalent to that of apoE3, while apoE4 is slightly less efficient (Ruiz et al. 2005). When apoE3 forms a disulphide
17 linked homodimer or heterodimer with apoA-II, which may represent up to 55% of total plasma apoE, LDLR binding activity is reduced by ~80% and ~70%, respectively
(Weisgraber & Shinto 1991). ApoE4 is less efficient at binding HSPG (Ji et al. 1994,
Kowal et al. 1990). Also, the binding of apoE to apoER2 and VLDLR promotes receptor cleavage and the generation of soluble receptors in an isoform dependent manner, with apoE2 being the most effective followed by apoE3 then apoE4 (Hoe &
Rebeck 2005).
1.2 ApoE AND MACROPHAGE BIOLOGY
1.2.1 The macrophage
The macrophage is a key component of the immune system. It is the primary cell type in the body responsible for the phagocytic removal and destruction of pathogens and dead tissue. Macrophages originate from myeloid progenitor cells, produced in the bone marrow, which give rise to monocytes that are dispersed throughout the body in the blood. Monocytes then enter tissues in response to chemokine signals and differentiate into macrophages (Janeway 1999). There are various factors that promote differentiation and maintenance of macrophage populations in the tissue environment, the most important being Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (M-CSF) (Stanley et al. 1994).
Bacterial, viral and parasitic/protozoan pathogens can be tagged by complement and immunoglobulin proteins of the immune system. This directs binding with cell surface receptors present on macrophages and mediates phagocytosis. Macrophages may also bind directly with bacterial cell surface polysaccharides (Taylor et al. 2005). Pathogens are endocytosed into a phagosome which then fuses with lysosomes to form the
18 phagolysosome where the pathogens are destroyed by free radicals and enzymes. This results in the macrophage becoming activated and secreting several cytokines involved in promoting an inflammatory response and attracting additional monocytes/macrophages. Macrophages also play a role as Antigen Presenting Cells
(APC) whereby pathogen derived peptides are displayed on the cell surface, enabling recognition by T and B lymphocytes as part of an adaptive immune response (Janeway
1999).
Macrophages are attracted to sites of tissue injury and play an important role in the removal of apoptotic cells, mediated by signals such as phosphatidyl serine (PS) exposure on the surface of apoptotic cells (discussed below) and residual debris from necrotic cell death (Fadok et al. 1992). In this situation macrophages play an important role in storing cholesterol and lipids derived from dead cells and redistributing them to regenerating cells. This process is facilitated by the production and secretion of apoE from the macrophage (Ignatius et al. 1986); (Snipes et al. 1986), a good example of this process is observed in the injury and regeneration of peripheral nerves (discussed below). The importance of this apoE-mediated role in macrophage biology is underlined by the fact that apoE can represent up to 25% of the total protein secreted by the macrophage (Kayden et al. 1985, Basu et al. 1981, Basu et al. 1982, Werb et al.
1986, Garner et al. 1997).
1.2.2 Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis is a disease of the vascular system that is the leading cause of mortality worldwide (Ross 1993). The key feature of atherosclerosis is inflammation and the presence of atheromatous plaques in the endothelial wall of arteries. Atheromatous
19 plaques consist of macrophages that have become enlarged and enriched with cholesterol and oxidized lipids, and are referred to as foam cells. Debris from apoptotic foam cells and cholesterol crystals can build up in these plaques, forming a necrotic core which makes the plaque unstable and likely to rupture. Plaque rupture can obstruct arterial blood flow causing tissue ischemia, the underlying mechanism behind the two most common causes of death, stroke and myocardial infarction (Hansson & Libby
2006, Ross 1993).
ApoE plays a protective role against atherosclerosis by promoting the efflux of cholesterol from endothelial foam cells (via reverse cholesterol transport, discussed above) and most probably attenuating the chronic state of inflammation (via anti- inflammatory properties discussed above) (Ross 1993). Possession of the apoE4 isoform, which is less efficient at promoting reverse cholesterol transport, is associated with an increased risk of developing atherosclerosis (Davignon et al. 1988, Menzel et al. 1983, Stengard et al. 1995). Also, apoE-/- mice are hypercholesterolemic and will develop severe atherosclerosis when fed a diet high in fat and cholesterol, whereas WT mice are resistant. The protective role of macrophage apoE is highlighted by the reversal of atherosclerosis in apoE-/- mice following transplantation of bone marrow from WT mice (Zhang et al. 1992, Plump et al. 1992, Boisvert et al. 1995).
1.3 ASSOCIATION OF apoE WITH APOPTOSIS
1.3.1 Introduction to apoptosis
Apoptosis is a tightly regulated form of cell death that plays an essential role in controlling the population of cells present in the tissues of multicellular organisms (Kerr
20 et al. 1972). In contrast to unregulated or accidental cell death, termed necrosis, apoptosis is genetically programmed and occurs following a well coordinated sequence of morphological and biochemical events (Ellis et al. 1991). The apoptotic cell undergoes cytoplasmic shrinkage, chromatin condensation, inter-nucleosomal cleavage of DNA, externalization of PS on the membrane surface and the ‘blebbing’ off of apoptotic bodies which consist of membrane-enclosed particles containing intact organelles. PS acts as an ‘eat me’ signal that directs phagocytes and neighbouring cells to efficiently phagocytose the apoptotic bodies and thus avoid inducing an inflammatory response (Savill & Fadok 2000). There are several other molecules that also act as ‘eat me’ signals, these include apolipoprotein J (apoJ)/clusterin, surface sugars and complement binding proteins (Bartl et al. 2001, Gardai et al. 2005, Botto et al. 1998). Necrosis on the other hand is often caused by acute trauma and is characterized by cell swelling and rupture of the plasma membrane, resulting in the release of noxious cellular material and induction of inflammation in the surrounding tissue.
Apoptosis plays a vital role in removing damaged, infected and unnecessary cells in the adult organism. It is also essential for the pruning of superfluous cells during development, for example, removing the webbing between fingers and the removal of excess neurons in the CNS (Yuan & Yankner 2000). Dysfunction in the regulation of apoptosis can result in major pathological consequences. An excess of apoptosis has been associated with diseases such as AD, PD, Huntington’s Disease, ischaemic damage and AIDS, while insufficient apoptosis can lead to cancer and autoimmune disorders (Cotman et al. 1994, Cribbs et al. 2004, Matsui et al. 2006, Yuan & Yankner
2000, Vogelstein & Kinzler 2004).
21
Apoptosis can be induced via extrinsic or intrinsic pathways, which activate a cascade of events culminating in cell death, predominantly mediated through caspase proteins
(Figure 5). The extrinsic pathway is stimulated by cell surface receptors, known as death receptors, belonging to the tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily, of which Fas and TNFR1 are the best-characterised (Ashkenazi & Dixit 1998, Chen &
Goeddel 2002, Wajant 2002). Ligand binding with these receptors results in activation of intracellular domains termed death domains (DD) and death effector domains (DED), triggering a cascade of intracellular events. Intracellular adaptor proteins are also recruited to enhance this effect. The extrinsic pathway is used predominantly by the immune system to control populations of activated T lymphocytes after an immune response and destroy virus-infected and cancerous cells (Janeway 1999). The intrinsic pathway is stimulated by the disruption of intracellular homeostasis from sources such as; radiation, DNA damage, lysosomal rupture, oxidative stress, growth factor withdrawal and toxic chemicals. These stressors induce mitochondrial damage which then triggers the apoptotic cascade (Brunk et al. 1997, Antunes et al. 2001, Green &
Reed 1998) (Zhao et al. 2003) (Erdal et al. 2005).
Apoptosis is mediated primarily by the caspase family of proteins which are cysteine proteases that cleave protein substrates following aspartate residues (Thornberry &
Lazebnik 1998, Cohen 1997). They are all synthesized as inactive proenzymes
(procaspases) that become activated after cleavage at a conserved aspartate residue, resulting in the release of an inhibitory N-terminal prodomain. In humans there are 11 members of the caspase family and they fall into three major categories, cytokine
22
EXTRINSIC Apoptotic PATHWAY stimuli Death Ligand Receptor INTRINSIC PATHWAY Death Domain Mitochondria
Bcl-2 Adaptor protein Cyt c Caspase-8 NF- B Apaf1 Smac/DIABLO
Caspase-9 IAP
Caspases-3,6,7
AIF Endo G
APOPTOSIS
Nucleus
Figure 5.
Schematic overview depicting the key features of apoptosis. In the extrinsic pathway, the binding of ligand to cell-surface death receptors activates intracellular adaptor proteins which then trigger the caspase cascade. The intrinsic pathway is activated by a range of apoptotic stimuli (eg. radiation, oxidative stress, growth factor withdrawal) that can disrupt intracellular homeostasis and induce mitochondrial damage. Pro- apoptotic factors released into the cytosol from damaged mitochondia can either activate the caspase cascade (cyt c), directly induce DNA fragmentation (AIF, Endo
G) or block other anti-apoptotic proteins such as IAP (Smac/DIABLO). There are also many other proteins that can promote or repress the apoptotic cascade, with Bcl-2 and
NF B shown as examples.
23 activators, apoptosis executioners and apoptosis initiators. Caspases 1, 4, 5 and 13 activate cytokines and play a role in inflammation, with only a minimal role in apoptosis. The apoptosis executioner caspases (caspases 3, 6 and 7) mediate the morphological changes characteristic of apoptosis by cleaving a wide range of cellular substrates, of which over 250 are known (Fischer et al. 2003). Two well studied examples of this include; cleavage of the microtubule-associated protein gelsolin, facilitating cytoplasmic contraction and blebbing of apoptotic bodies (Kothakota et al.
1997); and cleavage of the DNA repair and genome integrity protein poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), allowing DNA fragmentation (Nicholson 1996). The executioner caspases also cleave the aspartate residue present within procaspases, thus caspases can activate each other in a cascade-like fashion.
Initiator caspases (caspases-2, 8, 9 and 10) are responsible for activating the executioner caspases and thus triggering the caspase cascade. Initiator caspases are themselves activated by signals from the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways. In the extrinsic pathway, procaspase-8 is recruited to the activated DD and DED becoming activated and proceeding to activate executioner caspases (Boldin et al. 1996, Chinnaiyan et al.
1995, Muzio et al. 1998). In the intrinsic pathway cytochrome c (cyt c) is released from the mitochondria, activating protease-activating factor 1 (Apaf1) which then binds several procaspase-9 proteins to the form the apoptosome complex whereby caspase-9 becomes activated, thus activating the executioner caspases (Muzio et al. 1998).
The regulation of apoptosis is also modulated by several other proteins. Some well studied examples include; Bcl-2 which blocks the release of cyt c from the mitochondria, inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP’s) that directly inhibit activated
24 caspases and Smac/DIABLO which is released from the mitochondria to bind and inhibit IAP’s (Fadeel et al. 1999, Deveraux et al. 1997, Du et al. 2000, Verhagen et al.
2000). Additionally, apoptotic stimuli can activate the transcription factor NF- B, targeting it to the nucleus where it induces the upregulation of multiple anti-apoptotic genes (Karin & Lin 2002). Also, apoptosis can occur independently from caspase activation, whereby apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) and endonuclease G (Endo G) are released from the mitochondria and migrate directly to the nucleus, resulting in chromatin condensation and DNA fragmentation (Susin et al. 1999, Li et al. 2001).
This however is less common.
1.3.2 A role of apoE in apoptosis?
Recent studies have identified an association between apoE and apoptosis. ApoE is upregulated during the induction of apoptosis in human fibroblasts (Quinn et al. 2004) and THP-1 macrophages (Tedla et al. 2004). In addition, cellular apoE expression is increased following ischemic injury, peripheral nerve crush injury and kainic acid treatment and it is possible that at least some of the cells expressing apoE during these injurious conditions may be apoptotic (Ignatius et al. 1986, Boschert et al. 1999)
(Snipes et al. 1986, Hall et al. 1995, Kida et al. 1995, Horsburgh & Nicoll 1996)
(Ishimaru et al. 1996, Ali et al. 1996, Kitagawa et al. 2001).
The exact function that apoE performs in apoptosis is currently unclear, but recent studies suggest that apoE may inhibit apoptosis (DeKroon et al. 2003, Chen et al.
2005). Interestingly, Chen et al., have shown that apoE is highly expressed in malignant ovarian carcinoma cells, whilst being undetectable in benign counterparts (Chen et al.
2005). When siRNA was used to inhibit apoE expression in OVCAR3 cells, cell cycle
25 arrest and apoptosis was induced (Chen et al. 2005). Additional comparisons of gene expression in cancerous and healthy tissues (using the Serial Analysis of Gene
Expression databases and proteomics approaches) revealed that apoE expression is increased in several types of cancer, including breast, pancreatic, stomach, colon, prostate and liver (Hough et al. 2000, Yokoyama et al. 2006) . Also, the promoter region for the APOE gene contains specific response elements for the anti-apoptotic transcription factor NF- B (Du et al. 2005). These studies implicate a potential role for apoE in the inhibition of apoptosis in general; however, direct evidence for this is lacking and this issue therefore remains to be resolved. Other studies have provided evidence that apoE may facilitate the phagocytosis of apoptotic bodies by macrophages
(Grainger et al. 2004). Macrophages from apoE-/- mice are impaired in their ability to ingest apoptotic cells and there is a systemic increase in uncleared apoptotic bodies in these mice (Grainger et al. 2004).
1.4 ROLE OF apoE IN NEUROBIOLOGY
1.4.1 CNS lipid transport
The transport of lipids throughout the CNS is carried out predominantly by specialised
HDL-like lipoproteins, unlike the rest of the body where a broad range of lipoprotein densities are utilised (Pitas et al. 1987b, Borghini et al. 1995). ApoE is the most abundant apolipoprotein in the CNS, followed by apoAI and to a lesser extent apoA-II, apoJ and apoA-I (Ladu et al. 2000, Montine et al. 1998, Thomas et al. 2003). There is virtually no exchange of apoE or cholesterol between the CNS and the periphery, due partly to the impermeable nature of the blood brain barrier (BBB) (Bjorkhem &
Meaney 2004). Studies on liver transplant recipients revealed that apoE present in the
26 plasma adopts the same isoform as that of the donor liver, whereas the isoform of brain apoE remains unchanged (Linton et al. 1991). Thus, apoE containing lipoprotein particles and cholesterol are almost entirely synthesized in the CNS and are responsible for both the delivery and removal of cholesterol from cells within the CNS (Rebeck et al. 1998). The majority of CNS apoE is expressed by astrocytes and secreted as a nascent lipoprotein (Elshourbagy et al. 1985, Pitas et al. 1987a, Fagan et al. 1999).
Lipids and cholesterol are transferred to apoE via the membrane bound lipid transport proteins ABCA1 and ABCG1 which are expressed on astrocytes, microglia and neurons
(Wahrle et al. 2004, Karten et al. 2006, Kim et al. 2007). The transport of lipids and cholesterol to cells within the CNS is then mediated by the interaction of apoE with cell surface receptors, analogous to lipid transport in the periphery. Several apoE binding receptors are present in the CNS; neurons express LDLR, LRP, ApoER2 and VLDLR; microglia express VLDLR and LRP; astrocytes express LDLR and LRP (reviewed in
(Rebeck et al. 2006)). Lipoproteins are secreted into the CSF via the choriod plexus
(Strazielle & Ghersi-Egea 2000) and approximately 20% of apoE in the CSF, from
E3/E3 individuals, is present as a disulphide linked apoE homodimer or apoE-apoA-II heterodimer (Rebeck et al. 1998).
1.4.2 Cognitive function
The importance of apoE in brain function is highlighted by mouse studies where APOE knockout results in memory deficits and decreased synaptic density (Masliah et al.
1995, Gordon et al. 1995, Gordon et al. 1996). Targeted replacement with the human 3 allele, but not 4, ameliorates these deficits indicating that functional differences exist between apoE isoforms in the brain (Raber et al. 1998).
27
1.4.3 Role in nerve regeneration and repair
As mentioned previously (in macrophage biology section), monocytes and macrophages accumulate in regions of cellular injury and are responsible for clearance of cellular debris and redistribution of lipids to recovering cells via an apoE mediated process. A well documented observation of this phenomenon is seen in the peripheral rat sciatic nerve following injury by crush or transection (Mahley 1988, Ignatius et al. 1986,
Snipes et al. 1986). Macrophages converge to the site of injury and secrete large amounts of apoE, attaining levels of up to 5% of total soluble protein in the nerve sheath. Cholesterol and lipids scavenged from cellular and myelin debris accumulate within macrophages to be later released in apoE-lipid complexes for redistribution to injured and regenerating neurons. The production of apoE peaks after ~8 days then gradually returns to baseline levels after 8 weeks when regeneration is complete. ApoE delivers lipids to neurons via surface LDL receptors resulting in a ~100 to ~200 fold increase in neuronal intracellular apoE levels. The injured neuron regenerates its axon by sprouting neurites which migrate down the neurolemmal tube. The tips of these neurites are particularly enriched in LDL receptors. Interestingly, the presence of apoE4 is associated with inhibited neurite outgrowth in the peripheral nervous system (Nathan et al. 1994, Nathan et al. 1995) and a similar phenomenon most likely occurs with injured neurons in the CNS. APOE knockout in mice is associated with impaired clearance of cholesterol rich axonal debris following entorhinal cortex lesion (Fagan et al. 1998) and impaired recovery following closed head injury (Chen et al. 1997).
1.4.4 Neuronal expression of apoE
Although it has been known for quite some time that apoE can be present in neurons and accumulate following injury, it was believed that this was derived from non-
28 neuronal cells, chiefly macrophages in the periphery and astrocytes in the CNS (Boyles et al. 1985, Poirier et al. 1991, Diedrich et al. 1991, Zarow & Victoroff 1998).
However, more recently it has become clear that CNS neurons are capable of synthesizing apoE and that this is typically confined to the frontal cortex and hippocampal regions of the brain (Diedrich et al. 1991, Xu et al. 1999a, Xu et al. 1998,
Xu et al. 1999b, Han et al. 1994b, Bao et al. 1996, Harris et al. 2004, Metzger et al.
1996). Interestingly, neuronal specific regulatory elements have been identified in the
APOE gene proximal promoter (Ramos et al. 2005). Neuronal expression of apoE is increased in response to stressful stimuli such as cerebral infarction (Aoki et al. 2003), hypoxia and excitotoxicity induced by kainic acid or glutamate (Boschert et al. 1999,
Xu et al. 2006). CNS neurons of APOE knockout mice are more susceptible to damage induced by close head injury and focal cerebral ischemia (Chen et al. 1997, Laskowitz et al. 1997), and apoE possesses neuroprotective properties which include enhanced regeneration of synapses (analogous to apoE in peripheral nerves), immunomodulation and anti-oxidant activity (Kitagawa et al. 2002b, Kitagawa et al. 2002a, Miyata &
Smith 1996). Thus it is possible that neuronal expression of apoE promotes the survival of neurons in response to specific stressful stimuli.
29
1.5 ApoE AND ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE
1.5.1 Alzheimer’s disease background
Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative illness that leads to dementia and death. The risk of developing AD increases with age and is the most common form of dementia, accounting for approximately 60% of all dementia cases (Blennow et al.
2006). There are currently ~27 million people suffering from AD worldwide and, due to increases in human longevity and the ageing population, this figure is estimated to leap to ~107 million by the year 2050 (Brookmeyer R 2007). Thus AD poses a major problem to society in terms of personal suffering and financial burden. Unfortunately there are currently no treatments available to prevent or slow the progression of this debilitating illness.
In 1906 Dr Alois Alzheimer was the first person to recognise the unique behavioral and pathological characteristics that distinguish AD from other forms of dementia.
Behavioural symptoms typically begin with deterioration of short term memory whilst other cognitive faculties remain relatively intact. This progressively worsens and is accompanied by a loss of executive function (decision making and planning), language skills, social skills, motor function and culminates in the patient requiring constant support until death (Waldemar et al. 2007). These symptoms are caused by degeneration and atrophy of brain regions involved with performing these mental activities, commencing in the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex and temporal cortex, followed by the frontal cortex and eventually most of the cerebral hemisphere (Figure
6) (Braak et al. 1998). Atrophy is accompanied with severe neuronal cell loss, synaptic dysfunction, inflammation, microglial activation, oxidative stress and large deposits of extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles. The
30
Figure 6.
Diagrams illustrate the progressive spread of amyloid plaque and NFT associated degeneration (represented by dark blue shading) in the cerebral hemisphere during
AD. (Adapted from the following source: www.alz.org).
31 accumulation of plaques and tangles are the defining pathological features of AD when compared to other forms of dementia and is the benchmark by which a diagnosis of AD is confirmed post-mortem (Mirra et al. 1991).
1.5.2 Generation of amyloid plaques
Amyloid plaques are composed of the amyloid beta (A ) peptide which is derived from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) (Kang et al. 1987, Masters et al. 1985). APP is a transmembrane protein expressed as one of 3 splice variants; 695, 751 or 770aa. All variants are expressed in both neuronal and non-neuronal cells throughout the body, however, the 695aa variant is predominantly expressed in neurons (Haass et al. 1991,
Selkoe et al. 1988). APP is proteolytically cleaved by membrane associated enzyme complexes at three locations termed the , and secretase cleavage sites (Figure 7).
Cleavage of APP follows one of two proteolytic pathways, the major one being the non- amyloidogenic pathway and the minor one, the amyloidogenic pathway (Busciglio et al.
1993, Esch et al. 1990, Shoji et al. 1992, Sisodia et al. 1990). In the non-amyloidogenic pathway APP is first cleaved at the -secretase site by the enzyme complex ADAM10 and then at the intra-membrane -secretase site by a protease complex containing presenilin (PS) 1 and 2 (Wolfe et al. 1999, Steiner et al. 2002). This results in the production of a non-toxic peptide fragment, sAPP . While in the amyloidogenic pathway APP is first cleaved at the -secretase site by -site amyloid precursor protein cleavage enzyme 1 (BACE1) and then at the -secretase site to produce a non-toxic extracellular protein, sAPP , and the neurotoxic A peptides (Vassar et al. 1999).
Amyloidogenic cleavage of APP is enhanced within regions of the membrane known as lipid raft domains that are enriched in cholesterol, glycosphingolipids (GSL) and sphingomyelins (SM) (Hooper 2005). Two major species of A , either 40 (A -40) or 42
32
Figure 7.
Overview of APP processing. In the non-amyloidogenic pathway APP is cleaved at the secretase site by ADAM to produce sAPP whereas in the amyloidogenic pathway APP is cleaved at the and secretase sites by BACE and presenilins (PS), respectively, to produce sAPP and neurotoxic A peptides. Amyloidogenic processing is favoured within lipid raft microdomains. Abbreviations are explained in the text.
33 (A -42) residues in length, are produced as a consequence of alternate cleavage at the