Environmental Flow Policy Development in Florida

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Flow Policy Development in Florida Environmental Flow Policy Development in Florida Douglas T. Shaw Director, Conservation Science Florida Chapter History of Water Policy in Florida Water Resources Act (1972) Created Water Management Districts with taxing & regulatory authority Established water use permits for reasonable-beneficial uses and no adverse impacts to wetlands or others’ lands Required regional water resources planning & development of water shortage plans Authorized adoption of Minimum Flows and Levels (MFLs) and water reservations 1992 lawsuit and 1993 legislation compelled WMDs to set MFLs History of Water Policy in Florida 1996 lawsuit and legislation required FDEP and the WMDs to develop a priority list for MFLs and created a process for voluntary peer review Water Act (1997) Natural systems achieved legal parity with “reasonable- beneficial uses” Identified Water Resource Values that must be considered in setting MFLs Stronger linkage between MFLs and water use permits Added process for MFL prevention and recovery Prioritized funding for water resource projects to those aimed at MFL recovery & prevention Subsequent legislation provided better guidance on setting MFL priorities & clarified peer review process Minimum Flows and Levels 373.042 F.S. Minimum flows and levels (1) Within each section, or the water management district as a whole, the department or the governing board shall establish the following: (a) Minimum flow for all surface watercourses in the area. The minimum flow for a given watercourse shall be the limit at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area. (b) Minimum water level. The minimum water level shall be the level of groundwater in an aquifer and the level of surface water at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources of the area. Water Resource Values to be Considered When Setting MFLs 1) Recreation in and on the water; 2) Fish and wildlife habitats and the passage of fish; 3) Estuarine resources; 4) Transfer of detrital material; 5) Maintenance of freshwater storage and supply; 6) Aesthetic and scenic attributes; 7) Filtration and absorption of nutrients and other pollutants; 8) Sediment loads; 9) Water quality; 10) Navigation Water Reservations 373.223(4) F.S. Conditions for a permit The Governing Board or the Department, by regulation, may reserve from use by permit applicants, water in such locations and quantities, and for such seasons of the year, as in its judgment may be required for the protection of fish and wildlife or the public health and safety. Such reservations will be subject to periodic review and revision in light of changed conditions. However, all presently existing legal uses of water shall be protected so long as such use is not contrary to the public interest. Minimum Flows & Levels Concept Withdrawals & Diversions Natural Flows & Levels Ecologically sustainable Flows & Levels Reservation Significant Harm Minimum Flows & Levels Recovery Plan C. 1996 Minimum Flows & Levels Concept Withdrawals & Diversions Natural Flows & Levels Ecologically sustainable Flows & Levels Reservation Significant Harm Minimum Flows & Levels Recovery Plan Minimum Flows & Levels Concept Withdrawals & Diversions Natural Flows & Levels Prevention Plan Ecologically sustainable Flows & Levels Significant Harm Minimum Flows & Levels Reservation Recovery Plan C. 2007 MFL Status MFLs for 237 separate water bodies set since 1992, including 17 priority river segments, 13 springs, the Everglades & Florida Bay. Another 114 listed for adoption in the next two years, with 39 more currently prioritized for 2009-2015, including 31 priority river segments, 89 large springs & 4 estuaries NWFWMD to date has set no MFLs MFL re-evaluation underway for older MFLs (22 lakes, 3 springs, 1 river segment) in SJRWMD, SWFWMD & SRWMD Loxahatchee and upper Peace Rivers in recovery status MFL Status Water Reservations Status Only one reservation set to date, for Paynes Prairie State Park (1989) SFWMD developing reservations to implement MFLs in four rivers, Biscayne Bay, Everglades NP/WCAs. WRDA (2000) and “President and Governor Agreement” (2002) required reservations for natural system prior to completion of CERP projects or permits granted for consumptive use of water made available through CERP NWFWMD potentially working on reservations, in lieu of MFLs, for two springs and the Yellow River Failed legislation in 2002 & 2003 to require reservations for all Outstanding Florida Waters MFL Process and Opportunities for Engagement State WMD TNC Policy Development: Lobbying Legislative Changes Listing Petition for Listing Priority Date Legislative changes Research & ESWM concepts, tools, technical Development assistance Peer Review a) Petition – “substantially affected” b) Formal peer review panel State Oversight Consulting role to FDEP Rule Adoption Workshops & Public Comment Implementation Permits, Reservations, Adaptive Management, Prevention & Recovery TNC Engagement in MFLs Ponce DeLeon Springs Lithia Spring Gemini Springs Weeki Wachee Springs & River Green Springs Buckhorn Spring & Creek St. Johns River @Lake Monroe Rainbow Springs & River Rock Springs & Run Alafia River St. Johns River @ SR-50 Myakka River St. Johns River nr Deland Middle Peace River Wekiva Springs & River Upper Hillsborough River Volusia Blue Springs Loxahatchee River Madison Blue Spring Florida Bay Santa Fe River & Springs Lake Istokpoga Lower Suwannee River SWFWMD AMO methodology Fanning & Manatee Springs SJRWMD MFL methods manual Crystal Springs Southwest Florida WMD Middle Peace River Seasonal blocks to preserve natural hydrograph Peace River at Arcadia Comparison of 1940 to 1969 (blue) and 1970 to 1999 (green) Standardized Median Daily Flows 2.0 Two benchmark periods 1.8 1.6 1.4 based on regional river 1.2 1.0 0.8 pattern & multi-decadal 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 climate phase (AMO) Flow (cfs) / Watershed Area (sq mi) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Southwest Florida WMD Middle Peace River Low-flow threshold applicable year around – fish passage, wetted perimeter Multiple instream flow methodologies for each block Wetted Perimeter – PHABSIM for target fish and invertebrates, days of inundation of exposed roots, snags, floodplain features FLOW HABITAT Significant harm – 15% SUITABILITY temporal or spatial reduction in habitat availability PREFERENCE DEPTH SAND MUD ROCK Southwest Florida WMD Middle Peace River MFL implemented as “percent of flow” reduction that varies by seasonal block 2000 8% 1600 1200 13% Flow (cfs) 800 10% 18% 400 LFT = 67 cfs 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 St. Johns River WMD St. Johns River @ SR-50 Define multiple MFLs – low, avg & high flows – to preserve traits of natural hydrologic regime MFLs based on protecting the depths, duration and frequency of inundation needed to maintain natural wetland communities & hydric soils in the floodplain St. Johns River WMD St. Johns River @ SR-50 Range of variability for wetlands and soils based on literature & field data collection at multiple transects Minimum levels determined at each transect and converted to minimum flow over river reach Proposed MFLs are evaluated with respect to other water resource values (WRVs): fish & wildlife habitat, fish passage, estuary inflows & salinity, recreation, water quality St. Johns River WMD Volusia Blue Spring Identified winter manatee aggregation as most important resource value Based on relationship between spring and river flow and length of warm water plume in spring run Utilizes unique 20-yr data set of daily manatee counts & positions relative to intrusion of cold river water Hydrologic model estimates space available for manatees and accounts for population growth rates identified in species recovery plan Suwannee River WMD Lower Suwannee, Santa Fe & Waccasassa Rivers Madison Blue Spring Employed consultants to develop these MFLs Utilizes best elements of SWFWMD and SJRWMD approaches, with explicit focus on flow and salinity needs of TNC’s freshwater ecoregional targets, including prey and larval host species Like SWFWMD, a 15% loss benchmark is used, but significant harm interpreted as a 15% increase in the frequency of a critical condition Summary – SWFWMD, SJRWMD & SRWMD All three Districts embrace natural flow paradigm and utilize an approach based on sound science and protecting key ecosystem functions & services “Significant harm” interpreted conservatively Growing realization of reservations as a key tool for implementing the MFL in water use permitting. All are now committed to peer review and “periodic re- evaluation” Framework for adaptive management still a huge challenge NWFWMD NWFWMD NWFWMD Challenges & Lessons Learned Lack of definition for “significant harm,” once thought to be a serious challenge, has actually allowed interpretation to evolve in a positive direction Peer review has been a strong factor in facilitating this evolution Minimum flow policy language needs to be modernized – difficult to be prescriptive Priority for setting MFLs is based on urgency of threat – need a better way of prioritizing less threatened rivers MFLs carry no authority across state boundaries Need strategy for getting MFLs implemented in NWFWMD Need greater motivation for implementing water reservations Need investment and commitment to monitoring and evaluation..
Recommended publications
  • Effects of River Discharge and High-Tide Stage on Salinity Intrusion in the Weeki Wachee, Crystal, and Withlacoochee River Estuaries, Southwest Florida
    EFFECTS OF RIVER DISCHARGE AND HIGH-TIDE STAGE ON SALINITY INTRUSION IN THE WEEKI WACHEE, CRYSTAL, AND WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER ESTUARIES, SOUTHWEST FLORIDA By Dann K. Yobbi and Lari A. Knochenmus U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4116 Prepared in cooperation with the SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Tallahassee, Florida 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Suite 3015 Federal Center, Building 810 227 North Bronough Street Box 25425 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ---.--.-.--.-...-..........-.-.-.....-.....---- 1 Introduction ............................................. 1 Purpose and scope .--..-...-.....-....-..-..-........--. 2 Acknowledgments ...................................... 2 Physical environment -..-..........-........-.-.-..-.-.-.- 2 Methods of study -.--..----............-.-..-..-....-...--- 9 Data collection --.--.--...-.........--....-.....-.-.--- 9 Data analysis -.--..--.-................---..........-- 14 Physical and salinity characteristics ...--.--.......-....-..........-- 15 Weeki Wachee River ..................................... 15 Crystal River ......................................... 24 Withlacoochee River ------------------------------------- 29 Effects of river discharge and high-tide stage on
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Ocean, Lakes Abd Everglades in the Palm Beaches
    YEAR 2017 Experience Ocean, Lakes and Everglades in The Palm Beaches, Florida Discover the best way to experience Florida’s great outdoors, unique wildlife and natural beauty in The Palm Beaches. Situated between 47 miles of Atlantic Ocean and the shores of Lake Okeechobee, the largest lake in the southeastern United States, The Palm Beaches is the gateway to the Everglades and home to treasured animal sanctuaries, untouched nature preserves and a diverse range of soft adventure activities. TAKE A HIKE (OR PICTURE) Beauty is just a short hike away. The terrain is mostly flat, but tropical trees and plants abound with exotic wonder. Trek alongside wetlands in the Everglades or through wide-open wet prairie, no matter the trail, hikers will find sunshine serenity. DuPuis Management Area – Canal Point, FL The DuPuis Management Area is a 21,875-acre multi-use natural area located in the northwestern part of The Palm Beaches. The park land is interspersed with numerous ponds, wet prairies, cypress domes, pine flatwoods and remnant Everglades marsh. The area provides miles of hiking and horseback trails, an equestrian center, graded vehicle roads, backpack and group campsites as well as seasonal hunting. DuPuis is far from urban areas, and its dark night sky lends itself to excellent stargazing. Harold A. Campbell Public Use Area This site covers 17,000 acres on the southern border of The Palm Beaches, making it the largest constructed wetland in the world. Its public use area provides access to vast wetland habitat where bicyclists, hikers and birdwatchers can see a variety of wildlife native to Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • North Fork of the St. Lucie River Floodplain Vegetation Technical Report
    NORTH FORK ST. LUCIE RIVER FLOODPLAIN VEGETATION TECHNICAL REPORT WR-2015-005 Coastal Ecosystem Section Applied Sciences Bureau Water Resources Division South Florida Water Management District Final Report July 2015 i Resources Division North Fork of the St. Lucie River Floodplain Vegetation Technical Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document is the result of a cooperative effort between the Coastal Ecosystems Section of South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Florida Park Service (FPS) at the Savannas Preserve State Park in Jensen Beach, Florida and the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve Office in Fort Pierce, Florida. The principle author of this document was as follows: Marion Hedgepeth SFWMD The following staff contributed to the completion of this report: Cecilia Conrad SFWMD (retired) Jason Godin SFWMD Detong Sun SFWMD Yongshan Wan SFWMD We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Christine Lockhart of Habitat Specialist Inc. with regards to the pre-vegetation plant survey, reference collection established for this project, and for her assistance with plant identifications. We are especially grateful to Christopher Vandello of the Savannas Preserve State Park and Laura Herren and Brian Sharpe of the FDEP Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserves Office for their assistance in establishing the vegetation transects and conducting the field studies. And, we would like to recognize other field assistance from Mayra Ashton, Barbara Welch, and Caroline Hanes of SFWMD. Also, we would like to thank Kin Chuirazzi for performing a technical review of the document. ii North Fork of the St. Lucie River Floodplain Vegetation Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..........................................................................................................................ii List of Tables ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics
    University of North Florida UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2016 The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics Teddy Mulamba University of North Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, and the Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Suggested Citation Mulamba, Teddy, "The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics" (2016). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 714. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/714 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2016 All Rights Reserved THE INFLUENCE OF SEA-LEVEL RISE ON SALINITY IN THE LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER AND THE ASSOCIATED PHYSICS by Teddy Mulamba A Thesis submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION December, 2016 Unpublished work c Teddy Mulamba The Thesis titled "Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in The Lower St Johns River and The Associated Physics" is approved: ___________________________ _______________________ Dr. Don T. Resio, PhD ______________________________ _______________________ Dr. Peter Bacopoulos, PhD __________________________ _______________________ Dr. William Dally, PhD, PE Accepted for the School of Engineering: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seminole Battles of the Loxahatchee River
    The Seminole Battles of the Loxahatchee River. General Jesup's second campaign culminated in the two Battles of the Loxahatchee, January 15 and 24, 1838. In the first, Lieutenant Levin M. Powell (U.S. Navy), with a mixed contingent of sailors and soldiers, paddled up the southwest fork of the Loxahatchee River, where they disembarked and marched inland. In what became known as Powell's Battle, they stumbled upon and engaged a large force of Seminole, the same warriors who had fought Zachary Taylor three weeks earlier at Okeechobee. The Seminole were experienced guerrilla fighters and soon the casualties mounted for Powell's sailors (many of whom were new recruits), who broke ranks and ran. When Powell was wounded and ordered a withdrawal, Lieutenant Joseph E. Johnston and his army regulars conducted a rear guard action. This allowed most of the men to get back to the boats, but not before several were slain, including the surgeon. Learning of Powell's defeat, Jesup ordered his army of 1,600 men forward in hopes of engaging the same Seminole force. At noon on January 24 some of Jesup's troops were met by Seminole scouts, who fired on the lead file of Dragoons. The Dragoons gave chase, and along with a large group of Tennessee Volunteers, entered a cypress swamp half a mile wide. The army pushed across the swamp into a dense hammock and up to the Loxahatchee River. Using the shallow river ford to cross, the Indians quickly regrouped and waited for the troops to follow. The volunteers followed them to the ford and took cover, but faced with heavy fire, would not attempt a crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Proposed Minimum Flows Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report
    Recommended Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Proposed Minimum Flows Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report November 30, 2020 Recommended Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Proposed Minimum Flows for Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report November 30, 2020 Yonas Ghile, PhD, PH, Lead Hydrologist XinJian Chen, PhD, PE, Chief Professional Engineer Douglas A. Leeper, MFLs Program Lead Chris Anastasiou, PhD, Chief Water Quality Scientist Kristina Deak, PhD, Staff Environmental Scientist Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate on the basis of disability. This nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District’s functions, including access to and participation in the District’s programs, services, and activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation, or who would like information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities, as provided for in the Americans with Disabilities Act, should contact Donna Eisenbeis, Sr. Performance Management Professional, at 2379 Broad St., Brooksville, FL 34604-6899; telephone (352) 796-7211 or 1-800- 423-1476 (FL only), ext. 4706; or email [email protected]. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency using the Florida Relay Service, 1-800-955-8771 (TDD) or 1-800-955-8770 (Voice). If requested, appropriate auxiliary aids and services will be provided at any public meeting, forum, or event of the District. In the event of a complaint, please follow the grievance procedure located at WaterMatters.org/ADA. i Table of Contents Acronym List Table......................................................................................................... vii Conversion Unit Table ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit Specimen List FLORIDA SUBMERGED the Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene (145 to 34 Million Years Ago) PARADISE ISLAND
    Exhibit Specimen List FLORIDA SUBMERGED The Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene (145 to 34 million years ago) FLORIDA FORMATIONS Avon Park Formation, Dolostone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; with echinoid sand dollar fossil (Periarchus lyelli); specimen from Florida Geological Survey Avon Park Formation, Limestone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; with organic layers containing seagrass remains from formation in shallow marine environment; specimen from Florida Geological Survey Ocala Limestone (Upper), Limestone from Eocene time; Jackson County, Florida; with foraminifera; specimen from Florida Geological Survey Ocala Limestone (Lower), Limestone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; specimens from Tanner Collection OTHER Anhydrite, Evaporite from early Cenozoic time; Unknown location, Florida; from subsurface core, showing evaporite sequence, older than Avon Park Formation; specimen from Florida Geological Survey FOSSILS Tethyan Gastropod Fossil, (Velates floridanus); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Barge Canal spoil island, Levy County, Florida; specimen from Tanner Collection Echinoid Sea Biscuit Fossils, (Eupatagus antillarum); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Barge Canal spoil island, Levy County, Florida; specimens from Tanner Collection Echinoid Sea Biscuit Fossils, (Eupatagus antillarum); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Mouth of Withlacoochee River, Levy County, Florida; specimens from John Sacha Collection PARADISE ISLAND The Oligocene (34 to 23 million years ago) FLORIDA FORMATIONS Suwannee
    [Show full text]
  • Loxcover Flat.Eps
    LOXAHATCHEE RIVER National Wild and Scenic River Management Plan PLAN UPDATE JUNE, 2000 Florida Department of Environmental Protection South Florida Water Management District LOXAHATCHEE RIVER WILD AND SCENIC RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER II RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT 9 CHAPTER III PUBLIC USE AND CARRYING CAPACITY 47 CHAPTER IV MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY AND DIRECTION 69 CHAPTER V RIVER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 87 CHAPTER VI PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 109 CHAPTER VII PROGRESS TO DATE 119 AMENDMENTS TO OCTOBER, 1998 DRAFT LOXAHATCHEE RIVER WILD AND SCENIC RIVER MGMT. PLAN CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Rivers have always held a special importance and fascination for man. In the earliest days, interest in rivers centered on the more material things; a source of water, a means of transportation, a habitat of edible fish and fowl, and wastewater disposal. While these may still be important for modern man, rivers today have assumed yet another dimension in their ability to serve a wide variety of natural resource preservation and outdoor recreation needs. Whether for scientific research, education, boating, fishing, canoeing or simply marveling at the handiwork of nature, rivers and streams in all their diversity constitute one of the most valuable of natural resources. But rivers, like most things in nature, are susceptible to drastic change at the hands of humans. They may be bridged for highways, dammed for hydroelectricity, dredged for navigation and canalized for water control. Their banks may be cleared and their attendant marshes and swamps drained or filled for development. While much of this change, good and bad, may be inevitable as a side-effect of human growth and activity, it is unfortunately true that most of it diminishes the biological and recreational potential of affected rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Lower Kissimmee Basin Water Supply Plan Update
    2019 Lower Kissimmee Basin Water Supply Plan Update Mark Elsner, P.E. Water Supply Bureau Chief 2019 LKB Stakeholder Kickoff Meeting March 27, 2019 Water Supply Plan Requirements 20-year planning period Demand estimates & projections Resource analyses Issues identification Evaluation of water source options Water resource development • Responsibility of water management district Water supply development • Responsibility of water users Minimum Flows & Minimum Water Levels • Recovery & prevention strategies 2 LKB Planning Area Portions of Okeechobee, Highlands, and Glades counties Major agricultural industry Seminole Tribe of Florida Brighton Reservation 3 Public Participation Stakeholder workshops One-on-one meetings & discussion with stakeholders Meetings with stakeholder groups Governing Board presentations Draft documents distributed/posted on website Comments on drafts prior to Governing Board approval 4 LKB Water Supply Plan Update Process Individual Draft Plan Distribution of to Governing Meetings with Draft Chapters Stakeholders Board Lower Kissimmee Basin Water Supply Plan Kickoff Board Approval March 2019 Urban and Dec. 2019 Agricultural Water Demand Resource Projections Stakeholder and Water Workshops Supply Projects Environmental Needs Water Source Options and Water Resource Conservation Analysis 5 2014 Lower Kissimmee Basin Water Supply Plan Mark Elsner, P.E. Water Supply Bureau Chief 2019 LKB Stakeholder Kickoff Meeting March 27, 2019 Summary of 2014 Water Resource Considerations Limited surface water availability •
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Southern Florida's Native Plant Heritage
    A publication of The Institute for Regional Conservation’s Restoring South Florida’s Native Plant Heritage program Copyright 2002 The Institute for Regional Conservation ISBN Number 0-9704997-0-5 Published by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue Miami, Florida 33170 www.regionalconservation.org [email protected] Printed by River City Publishing a division of Titan Business Services 6277 Powers Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32217 Cover photos by George D. Gann: Top: mahogany mistletoe (Phoradendron rubrum), a tropical species that grows only on Key Largo, and one of South Florida’s rarest species. Mahogany poachers and habitat loss in the 1970s brought this species to near extinction in South Florida. Bottom: fuzzywuzzy airplant (Tillandsia pruinosa), a tropical epiphyte that grows in several conservation areas in and around the Big Cypress Swamp. This and other rare epiphytes are threatened by poaching, hydrological change, and exotic pest plant invasions. Funding for Rare Plants of South Florida was provided by The Elizabeth Ordway Dunn Foundation, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, and the Steve Arrowsmith Fund. Major funding for the Floristic Inventory of South Florida, the research program upon which this manual is based, was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and the Steve Arrowsmith Fund. Nemastylis floridana Small Celestial Lily South Florida Status: Critically imperiled. One occurrence in five conservation areas (Dupuis Reserve, J.W. Corbett Wildlife Management Area, Loxahatchee Slough Natural Area, Royal Palm Beach Pines Natural Area, & Pal-Mar). Taxonomy: Monocotyledon; Iridaceae. Habit: Perennial terrestrial herb. Distribution: Endemic to Florida. Wunderlin (1998) reports it as occasional in Florida from Flagler County south to Broward County.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: the Everglades to the 1920S Introduction
    Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s Introduction The Everglades is a vast wetland, 40 to 50 miles wide and 100 miles long. Prior to the twentieth century, the Everglades occupied most of the Florida peninsula south of Lake Okeechobee.1 Originally about 4,000 square miles in extent, the Everglades included extensive sawgrass marshes dotted with tree islands, wet prairies, sloughs, ponds, rivers, and creeks. Since the 1880s, the Everglades has been drained by canals, compartmentalized behind levees, and partially transformed by agricultural and urban development. Although water depths and flows have been dramatically altered and its spatial extent reduced, the Everglades today remains the only subtropical ecosystem in the United States and one of the most extensive wetland systems in the world. Everglades National Park embraces about one-fourth of the original Everglades plus some ecologically distinct adjacent areas. These adjacent areas include slightly elevated uplands, coastal mangrove forests, and bays, notably Florida Bay. Everglades National Park has been recognized as a World Heritage Site, an International Biosphere Re- serve, and a Wetland of International Importance. In this work, the term Everglades or Everglades Basin will be reserved for the wetland ecosystem (past and present) run- ning between the slightly higher ground to the east and west. The term South Florida will be used for the broader area running from the Kississimee River Valley to the toe of the peninsula.2 Early in the twentieth century, a magazine article noted of the Everglades that “the region is not exactly land, and it is not exactly water.”3 The presence of water covering the land to varying depths through all or a major portion of the year is the defining feature of the Everglades.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Water Quality and Overall Groundwater Input
    Assessment of Groundwater Input and Water Quality Changes Impacting Natural Vegetation in the Loxahatchee River and Floodplain Ecosystem, Florida By William H. Orem, Peter W. Swarzenski, Benjamin F. McPherson, Marion Hedgepath, Harry E. Lerch, Christopher Reich, Arturo E. Torres, Margo D. Corum, and Richard E. Roberts Open-File Report 2007-1304 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 20192 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Orem, W., and others, 2007, Assessment of Groundwater Input and Water Quality Changes Impacting Natural Vegetation in the Loxahatchee River and Floodplain Ecosystem, Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1304. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. 2 Table of Contents Page List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]