International Legal Issues of the Arab-Israeli Conflict an Israeli Lawyer’S Position
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ⅲ KFBJM¤3¤)3121* Jtsbfm 407 International Legal Issues of the Arab-Israeli Conflict An Israeli Lawyer’s Position Robbie Sabel� The Jews and Palestinians are entitled to self-determination in the historical area of Palestine. An Arab state, the Kingdom of Jordan, has been established in Eastern Palestine and a Jewish state, Israel, in part of Western Palestine. The status of the intermediate area, known as the West Bank is as yet undetermined. It was part of Palestine which the League of Nations destined for a Jewish national home, since, however, the majority of the population of the West Bank are Palestinian Arabs, who are entitled to a right of self-determination, Israel will have to relinquish its claims to this area. The Palestinians for their part will have to accept the Jewish right of self- determination in the state of Israel. Among the issues that will need to be negotiated between the parties are borders, the status of Jerusalem, security arrangements, refugees, settlements and water issues. Keywords Jewish People, Palestinian People, Self-Determination, Palestine, Israel, Jordan, Refugees 1. Introduction International law has played a central role in attempts to solve the Arab-Israel conflict. Both Arab and Jewish societies are based on strict written legal codes and in both * Visiting Professor of International Law, Hebrew University, Jerusalem. Ph.D (Jerusalem). Member of the Israel Bar. The author’s book, PROCEDURE AT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES: A STUDY OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE AT THE UN AND AT INTER-GOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCES (2006) was awarded the Certificate of Merit of the American Society of International Law. The author wishes to express his thanks to Ms. Ariella Gild for her invaluable assistance in researching and writing this article and to Ms. Ellen Rosenberg for her cogent editorial comments. The author may be contacted at: [email protected] /Address: 107 Yasmin St., Mevasseret 90805 Israel. 408 S/¤Tbcfm cultures great respect is given to legal matters. Both parties to the conflict tend to base their narratives, their information campaigns and negotiating positions on international law, on the premise that“ legitimacy and lawful authority are key components of political power.”1 Israel is an open pluralistic society so there is no one monolithic Israeli view and all this paper can attempt to do is to present some of the major international law issues from the perspective of one individual Israeli jurist. The paper first deals with the fundamental issues of: the right of self determination and Arab and Jewish nationalism; sovereignty over Palestine and the proposed Jewish national home; the territory allocated for the Jewish national home; the end of the mandate and Israel's declaration of independence; the borders of Israel and the status of the West Bank. The paper then examines some of the following issues in international law: occupation; Israeli settlements in the West Bank; international law as an internal element of Israel law; Arab refugees and the claim to a right of return to Israel; refugee property; the law of the return; the Israeli security fence and Israeli measures against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The final section presents a vision for peace. 2. The Right of Self-Determination and the Arabic and Jewish Nationalism Among the major international law issues involved in the conflict is the question of the right of self-determination. The author would maintain that international law recognize the right of self-determination of both the Jews and Palestinians.2 The constitutive elements of a‘ people’have been defined as“ a history of independence or self-rule in an identifiable territory, a distinct culture, and a will and capability to regain self- governance.”3 The Jews share a distinct identity which includes the Hebrew language, the Jewish religion, a complex legal code, national and religious holidays, common cultural icons, a body of literature, a shared historical narrative and a continuing sense of common destiny and people-hood. The Bible was written in Hebrew and is mostly set in the territory of modern day Israel. The Jews have a history of independence and self rule in the land of Israel going back thousands of years. During the long period of 1 ROGER FISHER, POINTS OF CHOICE: INTERNATIONAL CRISES AND THE ROLE OF LAW 12 (1978). 2 The right is recognized in both the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights “( ICCPR”) and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights “( ICESCR”). 3 AURELIU CRITESCU, THE RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/404/Rev.1 U.N. Sales No. E.80.XIV.3 (1980), and HECTOR GROS ESPIELL, THE RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/405/Rev.1. U.N. Sales No. E.79.XIV.5 (1980). Ⅲ KFBJM¤3¤)3121* Jtsbfm 409 time, the territory has been subjugated by various empires but no people, other than the Jewish people, has ever had an independent state in the area. Jewish independence continued till 135 A.D. when the Roman Empire suppressed the Jewish revolt, exiled most of the Jewish population and renamed the area Palestine.4 Throughout the centuries that followed there always remained a Jewish population in Palestine and the majority of the population of Jerusalem has been Jewish for the last 200 years.5 The latter part of the 19th century and early part of the 20th century saw the growth of both Arab and Jewish nationalism.6 Arab nationalism was encouraged by the British Government as part of its campaign against Ottoman Turkey during the First World War.7 After the war, the independent Arab states of Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Saudi-Arabia and Transjordan (now Jordan) were created. Palestinian nationalism, as a distinct aspect of Arab nationalism developed later; at first the Palestinian Arabs regarded themselves as part of Southern Syria.8 Although there were some manifestations of Palestinian nationalism at the beginning of the twentieth century, Palestinian nationalism fully formed after 1948 and further developed after 1967. The Palestinian Arabs are, however, nowadays universally accepted as a people entitled to the right of self-determination. Zionism, that is, the Jewish national movement, sought to rebuild the Jewish national home within Palestine which at the time was a neglected corner of the Ottoman Empire.9 Large scale Jewish immigration to Palestine began in the 1880’s. The Jews settled mostly on purchased wasteland, sand-dunes and malarial marshes.10 Between 1919 and 1939, about 360,000 Jewish people immigrated. In addition, over 50,000 Arabs immigrated to Palestine from nearby Arab states, attracted by the improving agricultural conditions and growing job opportunities, mostly created by Jewish 4 The area has been alternately known as‘ Canaan,‘’Judea,‘’The Land of Israel,‘’Israel,‘’Eretz Yisrael,’and‘ The Holy Land.’After suppressing the Jewish revolt of 135 A.D., the Romans renamed the area as‘ Palestine’after the previous coastal inhabitants the Philistines (who bear no relation to the modern day Palestinians.) See BENNY MORRIS, 1948: A HISTORY OF THE FIRST ARAB-ISRAELI WAR 1 (2008). 5 Israel Central Bureau of Statistics Jerusalem’s Population, available at http://www.jewishvirtual library.org/jsource/ History/jerupop.html (last visited on Aug 15, 2010), recited at J. OESTERREICHER & A. SINAI, (EDS), JERUSALEM 1 (1974). 6 JOHN NORTON MOORE (ED.), I THE ARAB ISRAELI CONFLICT 6 (1974). 7 In 1915, the British High Commissioner, in Egypt, Sir Henry McMahon promised Hussein the Sharif of Mecca to support Arab independence in the areas that would be liberated from the Ottomans, with certain areas being excluded. There is controversy over whether Palestine was part of the excluded area. The British Government’s position has been stated as“ The whole of Palestine west of the Jordan was thus excluded from Sir. Henry McMaho’s pledge.”See The British White Paper (June, 1922), available at http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/ brwh1922.asp (last visited on Aug. 15, 2010). McMahon himself has confirmed that he intended to exclude Palestine from the pledge (Letter from Henry McMahon to the Times of London, July 23, 1937) quoted in JULIUS STONE, ISRAEL AND PALESTINE: ASSAULT ON THE LAW OF NATIONS 146 (1981). 8 STONE, supra note 7, at 10 (1981). 9 For a description of how desolate Palestine was at the time, see MARK TWAIN, THE INNOCENTS ABROAD (1869). 10 Much of the land now carrying orange groves was sand dunes or swamps and uncultivated when it was bought. See U.K. Secretary of State for the Colonies, Report of The Palestine Royal Commission Ch. IX, (July 1937). 410 S/¤Tbcfm development of the land.11 3. Origin and Evolution of the Middle East Conflict A. Sovereignty over Palestine and the Proposed Jewish National Home The Turkish Ottoman Empire ruled Palestine from the Sixteenth Century until World War I. In its peace treaty with the Allied Powers following the war, Turkey relinquished any claim to Palestine.12 In accordance with international law, as it was at the beginning of the Twentieth Century, the victorious allies had the right to dispose of territory ceded from the Ottoman Empire. Following an ideological shift away from colonialism and towards recognition of the rights of peoples to self-determination, however, the allies did not annex the territories but rather agreed to administer them according to a mandate to be negotiated with the League of Nations. The Council of the League of Nations, in its 1922 Mandate for Palestine,13 incorporated the principle of establishing a Jewish national