DOCSLIB.ORG

Predation on Nests of the European Pond Turtle (Emys Orbicularis): Remarks from Failed Field Experiments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Predation on Nests of the European Pond Turtle (Emys Orbicularis): Remarks from Failed Field Experiments Herpetology Notes, volume 14: 1067-1072 (2021) (published online on 09 August 2021) Predation on nests of the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis): remarks from failed field experiments Enikő Horváth1, Peter Kaňuch1,2, and Marcel Uhrin1,* Abstract. The viability of many turtle species, including the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis), is imperilled by nest depredation. Depredation rates of the E. orbicularis population in eastern Slovakia are high; therefore, we aimed to identify nest predators and to determine which sensory cues they use to find the nests. From the set of different experimental trials with artificial nests in the field, only the application of turtle-scented water imitating the female migration path to the nesting site suggested potential predation of turtle nests driven by olfactory cues. Although we did not observe depredation of the installed artificial nests, we identified badgers (Meles meles), wildcats (Felis silvestris), and wild boars (Sus scrofa) as potential predators. Our results also imply that the use of chemical repellents should be considered for nest protection of the study species in Tajba National Nature Reserve. Key words. Nest depredation, artificial nests, nest cues, conservation, Slovakia Introduction Populations of the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis) are mostly decreasing and considered Nest predation in chelonians is one of the leading endangered mainly due to habitat fragmentation and causes of mortality during their egg stage. The rate of nest isolation (Rogner, 2009). The species represents the depredation is generally high, and it negatively affects only autochthonous turtle species in Slovakia, with the viability of local populations (Stanford et al., 2020). two known reproducing populations in the eastern and Nest depredation can be influenced by multiple ecological western parts of the country (Jablonski et al., 2015). factors, including nest distance from the water habitat, Among other threats, the long-term studied population rainfall, as well as vegetation cover (Kolbe and Janzen, in Tajba (eastern Slovakia; Novotný et al., 2004, 2008; 2002; Dawson et al., 2014; Czaja et al., 2018). Signals Horváth et al., 2017, 2021) is facing high nest depredation used by predators to locate turtles’ nests may be species- rates. Altogether, more than 234 depredated nests were dependent (e.g., Strickland et al., 2010; Buzuleciu et al., recorded during 2011–2017 (Havaš et al., 2018). Racoons 2016), whereas most of the depredation events occur (Procyon lotor), badgers (Meles meles), red foxes (Vulpes within a week after oviposition, likely because cues left vulpes), and wild boars (Sus scrofa) are the most common behind by the nesting female are the most detectable during predators of pond turtle nests in the western part of the this time (Burke et al., 2005; Holcomb and Carr, 2013). species’ range (Zuffi, 2000; Schneeweiß and Breu, 2013); However, depredated nests can be observed throughout the latter three mammal species also commonly occur in the whole incubation period (Riley and Litzgus, 2014). eastern Slovakia (Krištofík and Danko, 2012). Thus, it Therefore, to protect chelonian populations from nest is crucial to understand the behaviour of nest predators predation, various predator-exclusion approaches have with the aim of improving the effectiveness of protective been used in conservation actions (Buhlmann and Osborn, management activities. Therefore, the goals of our study 2011; Riley and Litzgus, 2013; Schindler et al., 2017). were to identify the predators of E. orbicularis nests and to determine which sensory cues they use to find the turtles’ nests. For this reason, we examined the effect of 1 Department of Zoology, Institute of Biology and Ecology, different artificial nest settings on the activity of potential Faculty of Science, P.J. Šafárik University, Šrobárova 2, 041 nest predators. 80 Košice, Slovakia. 2 Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľ. Materials and Methods Štúra 2, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia. * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] General experimental design. At three sites in eastern © 2021 by Herpetology Notes. Open Access by CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Slovakia, we constructed artificial nests by hand-digging 1068 Enikő Horváth et al. ~10–12 cm deep holes, a depth similar to natural E. at a distance of 2 m from the two nests, situated ~1.5 orbicularis nests (Novotný et al., 2004). During the m from each other, and arranged with the camera in a construction, we wore surgical gloves and clean rubber triangle (Fig. 1A). Nest sets were filled by two different boots to minimise the contamination of the construction substances that should stimulate interest of potential site by human scent. All equipment used was placed predators. One of the nests contained turtle-scented sand, on a clean plastic sheet spread out on the ground, and water from the Tajba oxbow, and a chicken egg. We we did not kneel on the ground while digging. We placed the chicken egg into the excavated hole and refilled designed three experiments with different combinations the hole with turtle-scented sand mixed with water from of settings (Table 1), and all of them were monitored the Tajba marsh. Additionally, we applied water to the by wildlife cameras (Spromise S308 940nm) to record top of the artificial nests (~60 ml) using a sterile syringe. predator species and the frequency of their occurrence. Water from the Tajba oxbow was obtained on the day of Cameras were set to rapid-fire (five photos after every the nest construction using a clean glass. To obtain turtle- detected stimulus) at various heights and distances from scented sand, we placed adult turtles into a box filled with the artificial nests, depending on the experimental design sand from the nesting site for 24 h. Because we did not (see below; Fig. 1). All artificial nests were monitored have access to E. orbicularis individuals at that time, we for three consecutive days after construction since nearly replaced them by two privately kept adult Trachemys all predation events on E. orbicularis nests occur on the sp. The other artificial nest contained the excavated soil same day of oviposition or on the following day (Najbar from the nest hole mixed with human urine (~60 ml) as and Szuszkiewicz, 2005; Havaš and Danko, 2009). an olfactory stimulus. Cameras were checked only at the end of the experimental Experiment 2. Artificial nest sets organised in the field period to avoid any intermittent disturbance of the area. in the same way as in Experiment 1 were constructed near We declared artificial nests as depredated if any sign of another frequently used nesting site (Tajba; 48.367°N, digging was visible. Different experimental trials were 21.767°E). Nests were filled by two different but variant conducted in April, June, and November 2020. stimuli at both sites. Ten nest holes were filled with Experiment 1. Ten artificial nest pairs (i.e., a total of turtle-scented sand only, and ten nest holes were filled 20 nests) were constructed near Tajba National Nature with chicken eggs only. To obtain turtle-scented sand, Reserve, Slovakia (ca. 48.367°N, 21.783°E), on the six adult Emys orbicularis (one male, five females) were edge of the most frequently used nesting site in the area isolated for 72 h at ZOO Košice in a terrarium filled with (Novotný et al., 2004). Nest pairs were randomly placed sand from the nesting site. After 72 h, the sand was used at a distance of at least 5 m from each other and monitored for the construction of the artificial nests. by one wildlife camera each. The cameras were mounted Experiment 3. Ten randomly placed artificial nests ~1.2 m above the ground on trees or vineyard poles, were constructed near the village of Poľany (48.450°N, Table 1. List of experiments showing the different designs. Tajba is an area of permanent turtle nesting activity, whereas in Poľany nesting activity is observed only occasionally. Experiment Artificial Nest Content n Site Dates nest hole filled with turtle-scented 1 10 sand + chicken egg Tajba 9–12 April 2020 nest hole filled with human urine 10 nest hole filled with turtle-scented 2 10 sand from ZOO Tajba 11–15 June 2020 nest hole containing chicken egg 10 disturbed soil with turtle-scented 3 water on the top + 10 m long turtle 10 Poľany 19–21 November 2020 scented trail Studies on Emys orbicularis Nest Predation 1069 Figure 1. Arrangements of the artificial nest sets (indicated by the clutch of eggs) and camera traps in Experiments 1 and 2 (A) and Experiment 3 (B). 21.967°E), where the last nesting activity of E. Results orbicularis was observed in 2018. This local population Over 3000 images were analysed during the study. In is probably now extinct, as the turtles’ water habitat has Experiments 1 and 2 no predators found the artificial been dried out since 2015 (Havaš et al., 2018). In this nests. In Experiment 1, besides the presence of some experiment, nests were simulated as disturbed soil with roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and European hares turtle-scented water on the top of the nests to imitate (Lepus europaeus), an American mink (Neovison vison) the odour of bladder water leaked by female turtles probably crossed the monitored area, but none of the during the excavation of the nest hole (Rogner, 2009). In artificial nests were destroyed and all remained intact. addition, to simulate the path of the turtles to the nesting In Experiment 2, no predators were recorded by the site, a 10-m-long artificial trail was sprayed from each installed cameras, and only some roe deer and European nest using the same turtle-scented water (Fig. 1B). The hares crossed the cameras near the E. orbicularis nesting turtle-scented water originated from a 20-l tank, where site.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Competing Generic Concepts for Blanding's, Pacific and European
    Zootaxa 2791: 41–53 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Competing generic concepts for Blanding’s, Pacific and European pond turtles (Emydoidea, Actinemys and Emys)—Which is best? UWE FRITZ1,3, CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT1 & CARL H. ERNST2 1Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Dresden, A. B. Meyer Building, D-01109 Dresden, Germany 2Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, MRC 162, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, USA 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We review competing taxonomic classifications and hypotheses for the phylogeny of emydine turtles. The formerly rec- ognized genus Clemmys sensu lato clearly is paraphyletic. Two of its former species, now Glyptemys insculpta and G. muhlenbergii, constitute a well-supported basal clade within the Emydinae. However, the phylogenetic position of the oth- er two species traditionally placed in Clemmys remains controversial. Mitochondrial data suggest a clade embracing Actinemys (formerly Clemmys) marmorata, Emydoidea and Emys and as its sister either another clade (Clemmys guttata + Terrapene) or Terrapene alone. In contrast, nuclear genomic data yield conflicting results, depending on which genes are used. Either Clemmys guttata is revealed as sister to ((Emydoidea + Emys) + Actinemys) + Terrapene or Clemmys gut- tata is sister to Actinemys marmorata and these two species together are the sister group of (Emydoidea + Emys); Terra- pene appears then as sister to (Actinemys marmorata + Clemmys guttata) + (Emydoidea + Emys). The contradictory branching patterns depending from the selected loci are suggestive of lineage sorting problems. Ignoring the unclear phy- logenetic position of Actinemys marmorata, one recently proposed classification scheme placed Actinemys marmorata, Emydoidea blandingii, Emys orbicularis, and Emys trinacris in one genus (Emys), while another classification scheme treats Actinemys, Emydoidea, and Emys as distinct genera.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Spring 2020 The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States Grover Brown Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Grover, "The Ecology and Evolutionary History of Two Musk Turtles in the Southeastern United States" (2020). Dissertations. 1762. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/1762 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF TWO MUSK TURTLES IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES by Grover James Brown III A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School, the College of Arts and Sciences and the School of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved by: Brian R. Kreiser, Committee Co-Chair Carl P. Qualls, Committee Co-Chair Jacob F. Schaefer Micheal A. Davis Willian W. Selman II ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ Dr. Brian R. Kreiser Dr. Jacob Schaefer Dr. Karen S. Coats Committee Chair Director of School Dean of the Graduate School May 2020 COPYRIGHT BY Grover James Brown III 2020 Published by the Graduate School ABSTRACT Turtles are among one of the most imperiled vertebrate groups on the planet with more than half of all species worldwide listed as threatened, endangered or extinct by the International Union of the Conservation of Nature.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN NE Terrapin Conservation Strategy
    The Northern Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin terrapin) in the Northeast United States: A Regional Conservation Strategy Prepared by: Stephanie Egger, Wildlife Biologist Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey, Inc. with Contributions from the Diamondback Terrapin Working Group Prepared for: Northeast Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Northeast Regional Conservation Needs Grant Program 2016 Made possible by State Wildlife Grants and funded by the Northeast Regional Conservation Needs Grant Program. REGIONAL CONSERVATION NEEDS GRANT PROGRAM The Northern Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin terrapin) in the Northeastern United States: A Regional Conservation Strategy was supported by State Wildlife Grant funding awarded through the Northeast Regional Conservation Needs (RCN) Grant Program (RCN Grant 2013-02). The RCN Grant Program joins thirteen northeast States, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in a partnership to address landscape-scale, regional wildlife conservation issues. Progress on these regional issues is achieved through combining resources, leveraging funds, and prioritizing conservation actions identified in the State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs). See http://RCNGrants.org. COVER IMAGE: Female Northern diamondback terrapin © Brian Tang i STATE AGENCY PROJECT LEADS AND/OR CONTRIBUTORS New Hampshire (for technical support) Michael Marchand, New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, Concord, New Hampshire Massachusetts Dr. Jonathan Regosin, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Diamondback Terrapin
    Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund Allows Teachers to Broaden Awareness of the Plight of the Diamondback Terrapin Maggie Dugan: Upper Township Elementary School Jane Krajewski: Quinton Township School Mary Lyons and Lynn Tyskas: Millville Public Schools Our Mission • Gain greater insight into the Terrapin Conservation Project through direct participation with scientists/interns at the Wetlands Institute • Create lessons and activities that can be used throughout the state (and beyond ) to help enlighten others about the terrapin crisis • Provide instruction about the diamondback terrapin at upcoming conferences and disseminate our units to help enhance core standard teaching by incorporating terrapin education within objectives that are already in place in the classroom SAVING THE DIAMONDBACK TERRAPIN Jane Krajewski Quinton Township Elementary School ISN’T SHE CUTE? Diamondback terrapins are the only turtles that live in brackish (a mix of salt and fresh) water. Terrapin Fast Facts! • Females are usually bigger than males. Do you know why? •Females are larger because they are responsible for carrying the eggs. •They also have smaller tails that don’t get in the way when laying the eggs. • Females leave the water to nest above the high tide line. • They lay about 8-12 eggs. • Females will dig a nest with their back leg. • This plaster mold shows the size and shape of a nest. Egg chamber WHY IS THE FEMALE TERRAPIN MORE ENDANGERED? • Most turtles that cross the road are females. • Females enter the roadway because they are looking for suitable nesting sites. Because males do not have to do this, they are usually not the ones to get hit by cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement and Habitat Use of Two Aquatic Turtles (Graptemys Geographica and Trachemys Scripta) in an Urban Landscape
    Urban Ecosyst DOI 10.1007/s11252-008-0049-8 Movement and habitat use of two aquatic turtles (Graptemys geographica and Trachemys scripta) in an urban landscape Travis J. Ryan & Christopher A. Conner & Brooke A. Douthitt & Sean C. Sterrett & Carmen M. Salsbury # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract Our study focuses on the spatial ecology and seasonal habitat use of two aquatic turtles in order to understand the manner in which upland habitat use by humans shapes the aquatic activity, movement, and habitat selection of these species in an urban setting. We used radiotelemetry to follow 15 female Graptemys geographica (common map turtle) and each of ten male and female Trachemys scripta (red-eared slider) living in a man-made canal within a highly urbanized region of Indianapolis, IN, USA. During the active season (between May and September) of 2002, we located 33 of the 35 individuals a total of 934 times and determined the total range of activity, mean movement, and daily movement for each individuals. We also analyzed turtle locations relative to the upland habitat types (commercial, residential, river, road, woodlot, and open) surrounding the canal and determined that the turtles spent a disproportionate amount of time in woodland and commercial habitats and avoided the road-associated portions of the canal. We also located 21 of the turtles during hibernation (February 2003), and determined that an even greater proportion of individuals hibernated in woodland-bordered portions of the canal. Our results clearly indicate that turtle habitat selection is influenced by human activities; sound conservation and management of turtle populations in urban habitats will require the incorporation of spatial ecology and habitat use data.
    [Show full text]
  • ( Malaclemys Terrapin Littoralis) at South Deer Island in Galveston Bay
    DistrictCover.fm Page 1 Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:19 PM In cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Occurrence of the Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin littoralis) at South Deer Island in Galveston Bay, Texas, April 2001–May 2002 Open-File Report 03–022 TEXAS Galveston Bay GULF OF EXICO M U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Drawing of Diamondback terrapin by L.S. Coplin, U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Occurrence of the Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin littoralis) at South Deer Island in Galveston Bay, Texas, April 2001–May 2002 By Jennifer L. Hogan U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 03–022 In cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin, Texas 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 8027 Exchange Dr. Austin, TX 78754–4733 E-mail: [email protected] Copies of this report can be purchased from U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225–0286 E-mail: [email protected] ii CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys
    Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) in the Central Appalachians A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Steven P. Krichbaum May 2018 © 2018 Steven P. Krichbaum. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) in the Central Appalachians by STEVEN P. KRICHBAUM has been approved for the Department of Biological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Willem Roosenburg Professor of Biological Sciences Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract KRICHBAUM, STEVEN P., Ph.D., May 2018, Biological Sciences Ecology and Conservation Biology of the North American Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) in the Central Appalachians Director of Dissertation: Willem Roosenburg My study presents information on summer use of terrestrial habitat by IUCN “endangered” North American Wood Turtles (Glyptemys insculpta), sampled over four years at two forested montane sites on the southern periphery of the species’ range in the central Appalachians of Virginia (VA) and West Virginia (WV) USA. The two sites differ in topography, stream size, elevation, and forest composition and structure. I obtained location points for individual turtles during the summer, the period of their most extensive terrestrial roaming. Structural, compositional, and topographical habitat features were measured, counted, or characterized on the ground (e.g., number of canopy trees and identification of herbaceous taxa present) at Wood Turtle locations as well as at paired random points located 23-300m away from each particular turtle location.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Biology of the European Pond Turtle Emys Orbicularis (L) in Italy 219-228 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Stapfia Jahr/Year: 2000 Band/Volume: 0069 Autor(en)/Author(s): Zuffi Marco A. L. Artikel/Article: Conservation biology of the European pond turtle Emys orbicularis (L) in Italy 219-228 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Conservation biology of the European pond turtle Emys orbicularis (L) in Italy M.A.L. ZUFFI Abstract Key words The updated situation and knowledge Emys orbicularis, distribution, ecology, of the biology, ecology, behaviour and pro- conservation, Italy, tection of the European pond turtle, Emys orbicularis (L.) in Italy is presented and discussed in the light of conservation bio- logical issues. Stapfia 69, zugleich Kataloge des OÖ. Landesmuseums, Neue Folge Nr. 149 (2000), 219-228 219 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Introduction In this last decade, a "Big Bang" of interest in Italian populations of E. orbiculans enabled Populations of Emys orbicularis in Italy are to build up a consistent data set. Information distributed mainly in coastal areas and inter- on biometry (Zum & GARIBOLDI 1995a, b), nal plains. Most regions of Italy have been systematics (FRITZ & OBST 1995; FRITZ 1998), mapped, but in some cases the information is population structure (KELLER et al. 1998; KEL- incomplete (Fig. 1, Societas Herpetologica LER 1999), space usage (LEBBOROM & CHELA - Italica 1996). An uncomplete knowledge of ZZI 1991), reproductive biology (ZUFFI & habitat use leads to a biased view on the ODETTI 1998; ZUFFI et al. 1999; KELLER 1999), and thermal ecology (Dl TRAM & ZUFFI 1997), have become available.
    [Show full text]
  • Diamondback Terrapin Malaclemys Terrapin Contributors: Dubose Griffin, David Owens and J
    Diamondback Terrapin Malaclemys terrapin Contributors: DuBose Griffin, David Owens and J. Whitfield Gibbons DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description The diamondback terrapin is a small, long-lived estuarine turtle endemic to coastal marshes, estuarine bays, lagoons and creeks ranging from Cape Cod, Massachusetts to the Gulf Coast of Texas. Currently, there are five (Hartsell 2001) or seven (Ernst et al. 1994) subspecies. More recently, Hart (2004) identified six management units. The subspecies found in South Carolina is Malaclemys terrapin centrata. Terrapins have varied coloration from black to spotted patterns on the soft tissue and dark or light-colored scutes with strong concentric layers on the carapace. The hind margin of the carapace curls up instead of flaring. Hind legs are large and toes have extensive webs. These turtles are strong, fast swimmers that feed on a variety of mollusks, crustaceans and other invertebrates. In South Carolina, salt marsh periwinkles (Littoraria irrorata) and blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) are among the terrapin’s primary food sources (Tucker et al. 1995; Levesque 2000). Terrapins are sexually dimorphic. Females are much larger than males and reach 15 to 18 cm (6 to7 inches) in length; males reach 10 to 13 cm (4 to 5 inches) in length. Adult females also have enlarged heads. Terrapins hibernate in the mud during winter and mate in the spring. Eggs are laid May through early August and clutches have 5 to 12 eggs (Pritchard 1979). The number of clutches laid per female in South Carolina is undocumented; however two clutches may be common (David Owens, College of Charleston, pers.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON MAP TURTLE Scientific Name: Graptemys Geographica Le
    Common Name: COMMON MAP TURTLE Scientific Name: Graptemys geographica Le Sueur Other Commonly Used Names: none Previously Used Scientific Names: none Family: Emydidae Rarity Ranks: G5/S1 State Legal Status: Rare Federal Legal Status: none Description: Like other species of map turtles, the common map turtle exhibits strong sexual dimorphism in both total size and head size. While males reach a carapace length of only 15 cm (6 inches), females may attain a carapace length of up to 27 cm (10½ inches). In addition, females have a much broader head than do males. The carapace is olive-green, with fine, lighter green or yellow lines that form a reticulated pattern, similar in appearance to the contour lines of a topographic map. A low, vertebral keel is present, though not nearly as prominent as the keel found on other species of map turtles. Absent on adult females, low vertebral spines may be evident on the posterior portion of the carapace in both juveniles and adult males. The cream to yellow plastron is unmarked in adults, though the bridge and lower marginal scutes have longitudinal dark lines and circular dark markings, respectively. The skin is olive to dark-brown or black with many narrow yellow to light green stripes. Behind each eye is a small yet distinctive yellow spot, not connected to any of the stripes. Juveniles have dark markings along the seams of the plastron and a more intricate carapace pattern. Similar Species: Common map turtles may be found in association with Alabama map turtles (Graptemys pulchra) within the Coosa River drainage, but the latter can be distinguished by their prominent spiny keel on the carapace (except old adult females) and the large yellow or light-green blotch present on the head between and behind the eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • In AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): Species in Red = Depleted to the Point They May Warrant Federal Endangered Species Act Listing
    Southern and Midwestern Turtle Species Affected by Commercial Harvest (in AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): species in red = depleted to the point they may warrant federal Endangered Species Act listing Common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) – AR, GA, IA, KY, MO, OH, OK, SC, TX Florida common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina osceola) - FL Southern painted turtle (Chrysemys dorsalis) – AR Western painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) – IA, MO, OH, OK Spotted turtle (Clemmys gutatta) - FL, GA, OH Florida chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia chrysea) – FL Western chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia miaria) – AR, FL, GA, KY, MO, OK, TN, TX Barbour’s map turtle (Graptemys barbouri) - FL, GA Cagle’s map turtle (Graptemys caglei) - TX Escambia map turtle (Graptemys ernsti) – FL Common map turtle (Graptemys geographica) – AR, GA, OH, OK Ouachita map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis) – AR, GA, OH, OK, TX Sabine map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis sabinensis) – TX False map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) – MO, OK, TX Mississippi map turtle (Graptemys pseuogeographica kohnii) – AR, TX Alabama map turtle (Graptemys pulchra) – GA Texas map turtle (Graptemys versa) - TX Striped mud turtle (Kinosternon baurii) – FL, GA, SC Yellow mud turtle (Kinosternon flavescens) – OK, TX Common mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum) – AR, FL, GA, OK, TX Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) – AR, FL, GA, LA, MO, TX Diamond-back terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) – FL, GA, LA, SC, TX River cooter (Pseudemys concinna) – AR, FL,
    [Show full text]
  • Western Pond Turtle Summer Habitat Use in a Coastal Watershed
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Spring 2010 Western Pond Turtle Summer Habitat Use in a Coastal Watershed Jae Abel San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Abel, Jae, "Western Pond Turtle Summer Habitat Use in a Coastal Watershed" (2010). Master's Theses. 3741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.bp29-6fvm https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3741 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WESTERN POND TURTLE SUMMER HABITAT USE IN A COASTAL WATERSHED A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Biology San Jose State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Jae Abel May 2010 i © 2010 Jae Abel ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled WESTERN POND TURTLE SUMMER HABITAT USE IN A COASTAL WATERSHED By Jae Abel APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY May 2010 Dr. Jerry J. Smith Department of Biological Sciences Dr. Nishanta Rajakaruna Department of Biological Sciences Dr. Paula Messina Department of Geology Dr. Sean Hayes NOAA-National Marine Fisheries Service iii ABSTRACT WESTERN POND TURTLE SUMMER HABITAT USE IN A COASTAL WATERSHED by Jae Abel Western pond turtle ( Actinemys marmorata ) habitat use was studied in a coastal pond, lagoon, and stream system during the summer of 1995 and 1996 at Waddell Creek, Santa Cruz County, California.
    [Show full text]