STATUTUL Asociaţiei De Dezvoltare Intercomunitară „ECODES Sălaj”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
DATE DE CONTACT CSVA , SALAJ Nr . Crt. Circumscrip Tia Sanitar
AUTORITATEA NAŢIONALĂ SANITARĂ VETERINARĂ ŞI PENTRU SIGURANŢA ALIMENTELOR DIRECŢIA SANITARĂ VETERINARĂ ŞI PENTRU SIGURANŢA ALIMENTELOR SĂLAJ DATE DE CONTACT CSVA , SALAJ Nr . Circumscrip Concesionar Nr., data si Prestator Nr., data si Nume si crt. tia durata contractului durata prenume concesionar/ sanitar acordului cadru prestator, date de contact( adresa, veterinara de de servicii e-mail nr. asistenta de telefon) 1 CSVA Agrij SC BIOTIC SRL 66/26.08.2015 Ticus Gheorghe, Treznea nr.88, Salaj 0761668120 [email protected] 2 CSVA SC BBVET SRL 1 /20.01.2017 Ionac Andrei Beniamin, Cluj Napoca str Portile de Almas Fier, nr 8, Cluj, 0743597088 [email protected] 3 CSVA Babeni CMV COSMA 267/15.10.1999 19291/15.10.2014 Cosma Ioan, Babeni IOAN nr 275, Salaj 0744666569 [email protected] 4 CSVA Balan CMV NUT CALIN 50/22.05.2015 Nut Calin, Balan nr 77, Salaj 0765031632, , [email protected] 5 CSVA Banisor 6 CSVA SC VETIKET SRL 68/26.08.2015 Szekely Andras, Benesat Cehu Silvaniei, nr.13, str. Crisan 0744880016 [email protected] 7 CSVA Bobota SC MATIVET SRL 14/28.01.2015 Mak Attila Zoltan, Sarmasag, str Garoafelor, nr 3, 0760612206/746806845 [email protected] Adresa: Zalău , Str. Tipografilor , Nr. 4 , Cod Poştal 450145 ; Telefon: 0260612124, Fax: 0260660152 E-mail: [email protected], Web: http://www.ansvsa.ro/?pag=590&jud=Salaj 8 CSVA Bocsa CMV RUS IOAN 958/01.09.1999 16346/26.08.2014 Rus Ioan Dorin, Borla DORIN nr. 384, Salaj 0753023660 [email protected] 9 CSVA CMV RUS SERGIU12/28.01.2015 Rus Sergiu Virgil, Buciumi nr. -
Romania - Adopted on 22 June 2017 Published on 16 February 2018
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV(2017)005 Fourth Opinion on Romania - adopted on 22 June 2017 Published on 16 February 2018 Summary The authorities in Romania promote respect and understanding in society and representatives of most national minorities report an overall embracing attitude prevailing between the majority and the minorities. The authorities have made efforts to promote minority cultures and education, and particular steps which have been taken to facilitate representation of national minorities in parliament are widely recognised and appreciated. The Law on Education remains the main legislative basis for teaching in and of national minority languages. A consolidated and coherent legal framework related to the protection of minority rights is lacking and the draft Law on the Status of National Minorities, proposed in parliament in 2006, has still not been adopted. Existing legislation regulating different aspects of national minority protection is disjointed, piecemeal, full of grey zones and open to contradictory interpretation. A coherent policy to guarantee access to minority rights is still lacking and respect of rights of persons belonging to national minorities varies according to local conditions and the goodwill of the municipal or regional authorities. Persistence of negative attitudes and prejudice against the Roma and anti-Hungarian sentiment is of considerable concern. Despite the resolute stance of the National Council for Combating Discrimination, court rulings and statements from the authorities, racist incidents continue to be reported. The revised Strategy for the Inclusion of Romanian Citizens Belonging to the Roma Minority – 2012-2020, adopted in 2015, sets targets in the key areas of education, employment, health and housing and addresses also promotion and protection of Roma culture and participation in public and political life. -
The Szeklers and Hungarians from Romania
STUDIA UBB GEOGRAPHIA, LX, 2, 2015, pp. 53-68 (RECOMMENDED CITATION) THE SZEKLERS AND HUNGARIANS FROM ROMANIA GR. P. POP1, A. NIŢĂ1 ABSTRACT. – The Szeklers and Hungarians from Romania. This study regards, as its main topic, the possibility of establishing at present, a geodemographical entity on Romania’s territory, since certain representatives of the Hungarian ethnical minority in our country, and with a particular insistence of those in the vicinity of the western border, always remember to bring into view the problem of establishing an autonomy, common to a Székely Land, located in the central area of our country, which would include Mureş, Harghita and Covasna counties. Without carrying out a detailed account of this situation, it needs to be mentioned, just as it will emerge of the following presentation, that such an approach has neither the most reduced geodemographical support, since the Szeklers, after being assimilated by the Hungarian ethnic group, are no longer present at the census of 20 October 2011. By taking into account the above mentioned aspects, in order to be able to respond to the insistent requests for autonomy in Transylvania, we proceeded to highlight, through a fairly detailed approach of the Hungarian ethnical minority, obviously in point of the number of inhabitants and of their distribution on Romania’s territory, resulting of this the fact that the number of Hungarians is of 1,227,623 people, value which related to those 20,121,641 inhabitants of Romania, means 6.10%. The total number of mentioned Hungarians is characterized by a pronounced concentration on Romania’s territory, standing out by creating a corridor with a diagonal aspect, on the northwest- southeast direction, consisting of seven counties, the first four (Satu Mare, Bihor, Sălaj and Cluj) being registered with 2.01% (404,561 inhabitants) of those 6.10% Hungarians, the following three (Mureş, Harghita and Covasna) accounting for 3.03% (609,033 inhabitants), and hence in the corridor are present 5.04% (1,013,594 Hungarians) of 6.10% at the level of the entire country. -
Beetles from Sălaj County, Romania (Coleoptera, Excluding Carabidae)
Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldiş”, Seria Ştiinţele Vieţii Vol. 26 supplement 1, 2016, pp.5- 58 © 2016 Vasile Goldis University Press (www.studiauniversitatis.ro) BEETLES FROM SĂLAJ COUNTY, ROMANIA (COLEOPTERA, EXCLUDING CARABIDAE) Ottó Merkl, Tamás Németh, Attila Podlussány Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum ABSTRACT: During a faunistical exploration of Sǎlaj county carried out in 2014 and 2015, 840 beetle species were recorded, including two species of Community interest (Natura 2000 species): Cucujus cinnaberinus (Scopoli, 1763) and Lucanus cervus Linnaeus, 1758. Notes on the distribution of Augyles marmota (Kiesenwetter, 1850) (Heteroceridae), Trichodes punctatus Fischer von Waldheim, 1829 (Cleridae), Laena reitteri Weise, 1877 (Tenebrionidae), Brachysomus ornatus Stierlin, 1892, Lixus cylindrus (Fabricius, 1781) (Curculionidae), Mylacomorphus globus (Seidlitz, 1868) (Curculionidae) are given. Key words: Coleoptera, beetles, Sǎlaj, Romania, Transsylvania, faunistics INTRODUCTION: László Dányi, LF = László Forró, LR = László The beetle fauna of Sǎlaj county is relatively little Ronkay, MT = Mária Tóth, OM = Ottó Merkl, PS = known compared to that of Romania, and even to other Péter Sulyán, VS = Viktória Szőke, ZB = Zsolt Bálint, parts of Transsylvania. Zilahi Kiss (1905) listed ZE = Zoltán Erőss, ZS = Zoltán Soltész, ZV = Zoltán altogether 2,214 data of 1,373 species of 537 genera Vas). The serial numbers in parentheses refer to the list from Sǎlaj county mainly based on his own collections of collecting sites published in this volume by A. and partially on those of Kuthy (1897). Some of his Gubányi. collection sites (e.g. Tasnád or Hadad) no longer The collected specimens were identified by belong to Sǎlaj county. numerous coleopterists. Their names are given under Vasile Goldiş Western University (Arad) and the the names of beetle families. -
Draft Map and the List of Administrative Units
Defining the Scope of Application for the Strategy for Development of Sustainable Tourism of the Carpathians: Draft map and the list of administrative units The Carpathian Convention Working Group on Sustainable Tourism at its meeting on 12-14 May 2014, Bratislava, Slovakia, discussed the map presented below. The Working Group concluded that along with administrative units, the map should include the geographical scope of the Carpathians as it is currently defined by the Party. The geographical scope of the Carpathians defines the core area for implementing the actions outlined in the strategy, while the administrative borders are useful for decision making, resource allocation and monitoring purposes. The Working Group decided to develop two maps that may be useful during the implementation of the strategy: 1. A map of local administrative units on LAU1 level in EU countries, “raions” in Ukraine and municipalities in Serbia that also features the geographical scope of the Carpathians. Such map may be helpful when involving the authorities and stakeholders into project development and implementation and when action is needed for decision making and implementation on the smallest administrative level. 2. A map of administrative units at NUTS3 or NUTS2 level, “oblast” in Ukraine and districts in Serbia that also features the geographical scope of the Carpathians. Such map would be useful when action is needed on the regional decision level, and whenever the interlinkage of the Carpathians with surrounding areas is important (e.g. for optimizing -
HOTĂRÂREA Nr. 48 Din 30 Iunie 2020 Privind Aprobarea Planului Judeţean De Analiză Şi Acoperire a Riscurilor, Actualizat
ROMÂNIA JUDEŢUL SĂLAJ CONSILIUL JUDEŢEAN HOTĂRÂREA nr. 48 din 30 iunie 2020 privind aprobarea Planului Judeţean de Analiză şi Acoperire a Riscurilor, actualizat Consiliul Judeţean Sălaj, întrunit în şedinţă ordinară; Având în vedere: - referatul de aprobare nr. 8321 din 17.06.2020 al preşedintelui Consiliului judeţean; - raportul de specialitate nr. 8322 din 17.06.2020 al Direcţiei juridice și administrație locală; - prevederile art. 15 lit. a) din Legea nr. 307/2006, republicată, privind apărarea împotriva incendiilor, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare; - art. 6 alin. (1) din Anexa nr. 1 la Ordinul ministrului administrației și internelor nr. 132/2007 pentru aprobarea Metodologiei de elaborare a Planului de analiză şi acoperire a riscurilor şi a Structurii-cadru a Planului de analiză şi acoperire a riscurilor; - prevederile art. 173 alin. (1) lit. f) din Ordonanţa de Urgenţă a Guvernului nr.57/2019 privind Codul administrativ, cu completările şi modificările ulterioare; În baza prevederilor art. 97 alin. (1) din Ordonanţa de Urgenţă a Guvernului nr.57/2019 privind Codul administrativ, cu completările şi modificările ulterioare, HOTĂRĂŞTE: Art. 1. Se aprobă Planul Judeţean de Analiză şi Acoperire a Riscurilor, actualizat, conform anexei care face parte integrantă din prezenta hotărâre. Art. 2. Cu data intrării în vigoare a prezentei, Hotărârea Consiliului Judeţean Sălaj nr. 64 din 31 mai 2019 privind aprobarea Planului Judeţean de Analiză şi Acoperire a Riscurilor, actualizat, îşi încetează aplicabilitatea. Art. 3. Cu ducerea la îndeplinire a prezentei hotărâri se încredinţează: - Preşedintele Consiliului Judeţean Sălaj; - Inspectoratul pentru Situaţii de Urgenţă „Porolissum” al Judeţului Sălaj. Art. 4. Prezenta hotărâre se comunică la: - Direcţia juridică şi administraţie locală; - Inspectoratul pentru Situaţii de Urgenţă „Porolissum” al Judeţului Sălaj. -
Uniunea Democrată Maghiară Din România
Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania “Mikó Imre” Minority Rights Legal Aid Service REPORT on the problems concerning the commitments made by Romania on the protection of and the right to use the Hungarian language, in the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages adopted at Strasbourg on 5 November 19921 drawn up at the time of the 2nd Regular Report submitted by Romania to the General Secretary of the European Council Submitted to the General Secretary of the European Council and the Committee of Experts of the European Council Cluj Napoca 2016 1 Ratified by Romania by Law No. 282 of 24 October 2007, published in the Official Journal of Romania No. 752 of 6 November 2007 I. Introduction 1. Romania has ratified the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages,2 adopted at Strasbourg on 5 November 1992 (hereinafter referred to as „the Charter”), and undertook a number of obligations on the protection of regional and minority languages used on its territory. By Article 2(k) of the ratifying Law No. 282/2007, Romania has assumed the implementation of the provisions of the Charter for the Hungarian language within the limits set out by Article 5(e) of the ratifying Law. 2. Hungarian is the mother tongue of the Hungarian community in Romania which represents 6.5% of the stable population of Romania, 1.259.914 of citizens declared Hungarian as their mother tongue, according to the census of the population of Romania in 2011. The Hungarian population is the majority in Harghita (85%) and Covasna (74%) counties, and a significant proportion of the population in Mureș (38%), Satu Mare (35%), Bihor (25%) and Sălaj (23%) counties is also Hungarian. -
Raport De Bilanţ
RAPORT DE BILANŢ Asupra activităţii desfăşurată la Judecătoria Jibou în anul 2015 1 2 INTRODUCERE SCURTE CONSIDERAŢII PRIVIND SITUAŢIA INSTANŢEI ÎN ANUL 2015 Judecătoria Jibou îşi are sediul în oraşul Jibou, jud. Sălaj, şi se găseşte în circumscripţia Tribunalului Sălaj, alături de Judecătoria Zalău şi Judecătoria Şimleu Silvaniei. Judecătoria Jibou este instanţă relativ nouă, fiind înfiinţată la data de 01.12.2008, potrivit Ordinului Ministrului Justiţiei nr. 2910/C din 12 noiembrie 2008. Până la data intrării în vigoare a Hotărârii nr. 794/2015 din 23 septembrie 2015, emisă de Guvernul României, competenţa teritorială a Judecătoriei Jibou a cuprins oraşul Jibou şi comunele Băbeni, Bălan, Benesat, Creaca, Cristolţ, Dragu, Gîlgău, Gîrbou, Hida, Ileanda, Letca, Lozna, Năpradea, Poiana Blenchii, Rus, Şimişna, Someş-Odorhei, Surduc, Zalha, deservind aproximativ 55 de mii de persoane, din 119 localităţi. Prin Hotărârea nr. 794/2015 din 23 septembrie 2015, emisă de Guvernul României, publicată în Monitorul Oficial nr. 735 din 1 octombrie 2015, s-a modificat şi completat anexa la Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 337/1993 pentru stabilirea circumscripţiilor judecătoriilor şi parchetelor de pe lângă judecătorii, competenta teritorială a Judecătoriei Jibou fiind astfel mărită. 3 În prezent, Judecătoria Jibou cuprinde Oraşul Jibou şi Oraşul Cehu Silvaniei, precum şi comunele Almaşu, Băbeni, Bălan, Benesat, Creaca, Cristolţ, Cuzăplac, Dragu, Fildu de Jos, Gîlgău, Gîrbou, Hida, Ileanda, Letca, Lozna, Mirşid, Năpradea, Poiana Blenchii, Românaşi, Rus, Sălăţig, Sânmihaiu Almaşului, Someş-Odorhei, Surduc, Şimişna, Zalha şi Zimbor, deservind aproximativ 72. 500 de persoane, din 169 localităţi. De la înfiinţarea instanţei, anul 2008, statul de funcţii şi de personal al instanţei prevedea un număr de 4 posturi de judecători, din care un post aferent funcţiei de preşedinte. -
Minority Politics of Hungary and Romania Between 1940 and 1944
ACTA UNIV. SAPIENTIAE, EUROPEAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES, 16 (2019) 59–74 DOI: 10 .2478/auseur-2019-0012 Minority Politics of Hungary and Romania between 1940 and 1944. The System of Reciprocity and Its Consequences1 János Kristóf MURÁDIN PhD, Assistant Professor Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) Faculty of Sciences and Arts e-mail: muradinjanos@sapientia .ro Abstract . The main objective of the paper is to highlight the changes in the situation of the Hungarian minority in Romania and the Romanian minority in Hungary living in the divided Transylvania from the Second Vienna Arbitration from 30 August 1940 to the end of WWII . The author analyses the Hungarian and Romanian governments’ attitude regarding the new borders and their intentions with the minorities remaining on their territories . The paper offers a synthesis of the system of reciprocity, which determined the relations between the two states on the minority issue until 1944. Finally, the negative influence of the politics of reciprocity is shown on the interethnic relations in Transylvania . Keywords: Transylvania, Second Vienna Arbitration, border, minorities, politics of reciprocity, refugees Introduction According to the Second Vienna Arbitration of 30 August 1940, the northern part of Transylvania, the Szeklerland, and the Máramaros (in Romanian: Maramureş, in German: Maramuresch) region, which had been awarded to Romania twenty years earlier, were returned to Hungary (L . Balogh 2002: 5) . According to the 1941 census, the population of a total of 43,104 km2 of land under Hungarian jurisdiction (Thrirring 1940: 663) was 2,557,260, of whom 53 .6% were Hungarian and 39 .9% were Romanian speakers . -
1/5 Anexa Nr. 1 NESECRET LISTA AUTORITĂŢILOR ŞI FACTORILOR
Anexa nr. 1 NESECRET LISTA AUTORITĂŢILOR ŞI FACTORILOR CARE AU RESPONSABILITĂŢI ÎN ANALIZA ŞI ACOPERIREA RISCURILOR ÎN UNITATEA ADMINISTRATIV TERITORIALĂ Nr. Denumire autoritate Coordonate Persoană de contact Atribuţii în PAAR crt. autoritate conform fişei nr. 1. Primăria Agrij 0727/755001 BERAR PAMFIL Fişa nr. 1, din anexa nr. 2 2. Primăria Almaşu 0728856141 ŢURUCA DĂNUŢ Fişa nr. 1, EMIL din anexa nr. 2 3. Primăria Băbeni 0747290636 VANCEA DOREL Fişa nr. 1, din anexa nr. 2 4. Primăria Bălan 0752/133998 MAGHIAR ISAIA Fişa nr. 1, 0760238066 din anexa nr. 2 5. Primăria Bănişor 0746/245910 POP GHEORGHE Fişa nr. 1, din anexa nr. 2 6. Primăria Benesat 0733064801 ROMOCEA SORIN Fişa nr. 1, 0744567385 din anexa nr. 2 7. Primăria Bobota 0744173287 SARCA AUREL Fişa nr. 1, din anexa nr. 2 8. Primăria Bocşa 0723250613 BAROU IOAN Fişa nr. 1, din anexa nr. 2 9. Primăria Boghiş 0724205039 MARINA IDA Fişa nr. 1, MAGDOLNA din anexa nr. 2 10. Primăria Buciumi 0724057051 HOLHOŞ IOAN Fişa nr. 1, din anexa nr. 2 11. Primăria Camăr 0766/373074 SZABO LEVENTE Fişa nr. 1, din anexa nr. 2 12. Primăria Carastelec 0766/612019 FALUVEGI Fişa nr. 1, FRANCISC din anexa nr. 2 13. Primăria Cehu Silvaniei 0744/381991 VARGA ANDREI Fişa nr. 1, din anexa nr. 2 14. Primăria Chieşd 0766750221 CĂTANĂ IOAN Fişa nr. 1, din anexa nr. 2 15. Primăria Cizer 0753077622 CRISTEA NICOLAE Fişa nr. 1, din anexa nr. 2 16. Primăria Coşeiu 0741580708 MESEŞAN IOAN Fişa nr. 1, din anexa nr. 2 0744-637647 17. Primăria Crasna POP EMERIC Fişa nr. -
Caravana Culturii Caravana Culturii
CONSILIUL JUDEŢEAN SĂLAJ CARAVANA CULTURII SĂLĂJENE Personalități ale comunei Surduc Surduc, 30 martie 2014 Organizatori CONSILIUL JUDEȚEAN SĂLAJ CENTRUL DE CULTURĂ ȘI ARTĂ AL JUDEȚULUI SĂLAJ ASOCIAȚIA CULTURALĂ JAD PRIMĂRIA COMUNEI SURDUC LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC NR.1, SURDUC Sponsori S.C. CORAMET SRL BAIA-MARE S.C. DAMOS TRANS SRL SURDUC S.C. PANI PRODEX SRL ZALĂU S.C. DARIS TRANS SRL SURDUC S.C. PRIMEX SRL CLUJ Redactori: Ioan Dîngă, Mădălina Rus, Ioan Petran, Mihai Zaharia, Emanuel Petran Tehnoredactori: Ioan Dîngă, Mădălina Rus Supliment al revistei „Caiete Silvane”, apărut cu sprijinul financiar al Centrului de Cultură și Artă al Județului Sălaj www.culturasalaj.ro, www.caietesilvane.ro - se distribuie gratuit - CARAVANA CULTURII SĂLĂJENE Colectivul de redacţie Prof. Ioan Dîngă Prof. Mădălina Rus Prof. Ioan Petran ... mai tânăr! Prof. Mihai Zaharia CARAVANA CULTURII SĂLĂJENE Personalități ale comunei Surduc Surduc, 30 martie 2014 2 Cuprins Introducere Scurtă prezentare istorico-geografică pp. 4-6 Intelectualul şi satul românesc p .7 Dascăli de altădată! pp. 7-9 Spiritual și material p. 10 Ananie Fărcaș p. 11 Irina Grigorescu (n. Heindl) pp. 12-13 Ion Maxim pp. 14-15 Ca pe vremea lui VANCEA … pp. 15-18 Ana Pop (n. Câmpean) pp. 19-21 Alexandru Fărcaș p. 22 Gheorghe Both pp. 23-25 Ioan Jugrestan pp. 25-28 Crâmpeie de viaţă pp. 29-31 Laura Bacali (Dezmerean) pp. 31-34 Nicolae Both pp. 35-36 Vasile Pușcaș pp. 37-40 Viorel Mureşan pp. 41-44 Un gând pentru un om pp. 45-47 3 CARAVANA CULTURII SĂLĂJENE Daniel Săuca, Director - Centrul de Cultură şi Artă al Judeţului Sălaj Centrul de Cultură şi Artă al Judeţului Sălaj este o instituţie de cultură în subordinea Consiliului Judeţean Sălaj. -
Historic Jewish Sites in Romania Samuel D
Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2010 Historic Jewish Sites in Romania Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission of the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Heritage Sites of Bosnia-Herzegovina" (2011). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 97. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/97 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HISTORIC JEWISH SITES IN ROMANIA United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2010 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Linda L. Addison Michael B. Levy New York, NY Washington, DC Ned W. Bandler Rachmiel Liberman Bridgewater, CT Brookline, MA Ronald H. Bloom Harley Lippman Beverly Hills, CA New York, NY William C. Daroff Michael Menis Washington, DC Inverness, IL Tyrone C. Fahner Larry Pressler Evanston, IL Washington, DC Emil A. Fish Jonathan J. Rikoon Pasadena, CA Far Rockaway, NY Jules Fleischer Harriet Rotter Brooklyn, NY Bingham Farms, MI Martin B. Gold Lee R. Seeman Washington, DC Great Neck, NY Peter Hawryluk Lawrence E. Steinberg Zionsville, IN Dallas, TX Andrew M. Klein Robert Zarnegin Parkland, FL Beverly Hills, CA 1400 K Street, NW, Suite 401 Washington, DC 20005 Tel.: (202) 254-3824, Fax: (202) 254-3934 [email protected] Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................