Climate Change Impacts on Agricultural Weeds in

Pub no. 11/059

www.rirdc.gov.au

11-059 Covers.indd 1 25/10/2011 2:44:38 PM 11-059 Covers.indd 2 25/10/2011 2:44:38 PM

Climate Change Impacts on Agricultural Weeds in Western Australia

by Pippa J Michael, Paul B Yeoh, Noboru Ota and John K Scott

October 2011

RIRDC Publication No. 11/059 RIRDC Project No. AWRC 08-85

© 2011 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved.

ISBN 978-1-74254-243-0 ISSN 1440-6845

Climate change impacts on agricultural weeds in Western Australia Publication No. 11/059 Project No. AWRC 08-85

The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances.

While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication.

The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors.

The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication.

This publication is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. However, wide dissemination is encouraged. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the RIRDC Publications Manager on phone 02 6271 4165.

Researcher Contact Details

Dr Pippa J Michael Curtin University, Private Mailbag 1, P.O. Northam, W.A. 6401, Australia

Phone: +61 8 9690 1444 Fax: +61 8 9690 1500 Email: [email protected]

In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to RIRDC publishing this material in its edited form.

RIRDC Contact Details

Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 2, 15 National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600

PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604

Phone: 02 6271 4100 Fax: 02 6271 4199 Email: [email protected]. Web: http://www.rirdc.gov.au

Electronically published by RIRDC in October 2011 Print-on-demand by Union Offset Printing, Canberra at www.rirdc.gov.au or phone 1300 634 313

ii

Foreword

Weeds cost Australian agriculture over $4 billion annually through factors such as yield loss and management costs. Although not quantified, the impact of weeds on natural ecosystems has also been recognised as a serious threat to biodiversity. Consequently there is a significant need to understand the factors that influence the distribution, spread and abundance of invasive weed species in agriculture, under both current and future environmental and management conditions.

This project focuses on the weed risk in relation to climate change in the Northern Agricultural Region (NAR) of Western Australia. The region was chosen because it is predicted to experience considerable environmental impact from climate change. It is also one of Australia’s highly productive agricultural regions, generating approximately $1 billion annually.

From a complete list of species present within the NAR and buffer zones, the top 20 priority weeds were chosen by an expert panel and put through a detailed weed risk assessment (WRA) based on the ability of weeds to grow in different climates.

The main priority for future research is to extend this study to include an assessment applicable to the whole cropping region of Western Australia.

This project was funded in Phase 1 of the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program, which was managed by the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) from 2008 to 2010. The Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC) is now publishing the final reports of these projects.

Phase 2 of the Program, which is funded to 30 June 2012 by the Australian Government, is being managed by RIRDC with the goal of reducing the impact of invasive weeds on farm and forestry productivity as well as on biodiversity. RIRDC is commissioning some 50 projects that both extends on the research undertaken in Phase 1 and moves into new areas. These reports will be published in the second half of 2012.

This report is an addition to RIRDC’s diverse range of over 2000 research publications which can be viewed and freely downloaded from our website www.rirdc.gov.au. Information on the Weeds Program is available online at www.rirdc.gov.au/weeds

Most of RIRDC’s publications are available for viewing, free downloading or purchasing online at www.rirdc.gov.au. Purchases can also be made by phoning 1300 634 313.

Craig Burns Acting Managing Director Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation

iii

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the input of the following panel members during the prioritisation workshop: Andrew Reeves, Catherine Borger, Jon Dodd, Rod Randal, Sandy Lloyd (Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia), David Minkey (Western Australian No-Tillage Farmers Association), Mechelle Owen (University of Western Australia) and Kelly Agar (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation). Thanks also to Catherine Borger and Andrea Schatral (Curtin University) for their assistance with the detailed weeds risk assessments.

iv

Contents

Foreword ...... iii

Acknowledgments...... iv

Executive summary ...... vii

Introduction ...... 1

Objectives ...... 8

Methodology ...... 9

Results ...... 12

Implications...... 21

Recommendations ...... 23

Appendix: Weed species lists ...... 24

References ...... 33

v

Tables

Table 1. Shires used to define the Northern Agricultural Region, agricultural buffer and rangeland buffer ...... 2

Table 2. Surveys and databases used to collate a list of species present within the NAR and buffer zones ...... 9

Table 3. South Australian weed risk assessment guide management matrix (Virtue 2008) ...... 11

Table 4. Additional species included in the final ‘high risk agricultural weeds’ list ...... 14

Table 5. High risk agricultural weeds in the NAR. Species highlighted in yellow were deemed ‘too common’ for inclusion in the WRA...... 15

Table 6. Weed risk assessment category scores for top 20 ‘riskiest’ weeds ...... 19

Table 7. Comparative weed risk (CWR) and feasibility of containment (FOC) scores for the 20 riskiest weeds ...... 20

Figures

Figure 1. Shires included in the Northern Agricultural Region (NAR) of Western Australia, and shires designated as the agricultural buffer and the rangeland buffer ...... 3

Figure 2. Climate change projections for 2070 based on the ECHAM5/MPI-OM model, emissions scenario A1B and medium climate sensitivity (CSIRO 2009) ...... 4

Figure 3. Total rainfall and mean surface temperature change between 2010 and 2070 based on the ECHAM5/MPI-OM model, emissions scenario A1B and medium climate sensitivity (CSIRO 2009) .. 5

Figure 4. Map of the NAR indicating field locations from the summer (Michael et al. 2010) and GRDC weeds survey (Michael, unpublished) ...... 10

Figure 5. Flow chart showing the decision process for reduction of weed list (* indicates discrete species) ...... 13

Appendix tables

Appendix table 1. Agricultural weeds of high and medium weed risk present within the NAR and buffer zones ...... 25

Appendix table 2. Non-agricultural weeds of high and medium weed risk present within the NAR and buffer zones ...... 29

vi

Executive summary

What the report is about

This project focuses on the weed risk in relation to climate change in the Northern Agricultural Region (NAR) of Western Australia. The region was chosen because it is predicted to experience considerable environmental impact from climate change. It is also one of Australia’s highly productive agricultural regions, generating approximately $1 billion annually.

This project aimed to assess the impact of climate change on agricultural weed spread by building on the distribution data collected from field surveys of the NAR and neighbouring areas.

Based on the feasibility of containment scores generated by this report, it is possible to determine what course of action could be taken for control of the 20 riskiest weeds as in the NAR.

Where are the relevant industries located in Australia?

In the future, potentially large reductions in rainfall will reduce agricultural yields markedly. Experience has also shown that increased temperatures during the growing seasons of crops are likely to negatively affect yield. In such an eventuality, cropping will become more challenging at the current dry margins of regions with Mediterranean climate, such as south-west Australia, but may expand into areas currently generally too wet for regular cropping. A significant part of the challenge will be the weed regime, which will increase the level of stress faced by crops.

Aims/objectives

This project aimed to assess the impact of climate change on agricultural weed spread by building on the distribution data collected from field surveys of the NAR and neighbouring areas. The research objectives included:

• Applying a weed risk assessment (WRA) model to determine the relative weed threats posed by 20 high-priority species in the survey.

• Developing CLIMEX models for the five ‘riskiest’ species.

• A prediction of the distribution of each weed species in 2070 under an IPCC4 scenario relevant to Australia.

• Developing recommendations for adaptation responses to manage the changed weed threat.

Methods used

Several field surveys and databases were used to develop a complete list of plant species present within the NAR and buffer zones. Each species was then categorised according to its weed risk.

Weed risk assessments on the region’s 20 riskiest weeds were conducted using criteria based on the South Australian weed risk management guide, and a final five species were selected for CLIMEX modelling. The land use chosen for each WRA was a crop–pasture rotation within the NAR.

Results/key findings

Based on the feasibility of containment score, a course of action can be determined for control of each weed. For example, species that are currently widespread and difficult to control have a negligible rating, which suggests that containment is very unlikely and control should be based on ongoing

vii

management. Species which are not currently present within the NAR have a very high chance of containment; therefore, the course of action is to restrain the spread.

Implications for relevant stakeholdersr:

Under a future climate change scenario of annual temperature increases of 1.7–2.5°C and rainfall decreases of 5 mm (16%) in summer and 40 mm (23%) in winter, it is expected that each of the 20 species selected for detailed WRAs would have a significant impact on the crop–pasture rotation systems of the NAR.

Recommendations

The main priority for future research is to extend this study to include an assessment applicable to the whole cropping region of Western Australia.

The risk assessments are based on the ability of weeds to grow in different climates. Each risk assessment could be augmented by overlays of the weed’s response to different soil types, agricultural practices and other non-climatic factors. However, research would be needed to establish the relevance of those factors to the growth and survival of each weed species.

viii

Introduction

Weeds cost Australian agriculture over $4 billion annually through factors such as yield loss and management costs (Sinden et al. 2004). Although not quantified, the impact of weeds on natural ecosystems has also been recognised as a serious threat to biodiversity. Consequently there is a significant need to understand the factors that influence the distribution, spread and abundance of invasive weed species in agriculture, under both current and future environmental and management conditions.

In the future, potentially large reductions in rainfall will reduce agricultural yields markedly (Stokes and Howden 2008). Experience has also shown that increased temperatures during the growing seasons of crops are likely to negatively affect yield (Battisti and Naylor 2009). In such an eventuality, cropping will become more challenging at the current dry margins of regions with Mediterranean climate, such as south-west Australia, but may expand into areas currently generally too wet for regular cropping (Stokes and Howden 2008). A significant part of the challenge will be the weed regime, which will increase the level of stress faced by crops.

This project focuses on the weed risk in relation to climate change in the Northern Agricultural Region (NAR) of Western Australia. The region was chosen because it is predicted to experience considerable environmental impact from climate change. It is also one of Australia’s highly productive agricultural regions, generating approximately $1 billion annually.

The Northern Agricultural Region

The NAR is one of 56 natural resource management (NRM) regions identified by the Australian Government and state and territory governments based on catchments or bioregions. According to the Northern Agricultural Catchment Council (NACC), the coordinating body for the region, the NAR consists of approximately 7.5 million hectares, of which 70% has been developed for agricultural use, that is controlled by over 2000 landowners (>100 ha).

Currently, the defined boundary of the NAR is inconsistent between organisations such as the NACC, the Department of Agriculture and Food WA (DAFWA), Caring for Our Country and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. In this study, we have used data from Caring for Our Country (www.nrm.gov.au/apps/projects/town-search.html) to determine the 14 shires located within the NAR (Table 1, Figure 1).

We also retained a buffer zone, which consisted of three rangeland and five agricultural shires, around the NAR. The buffer was included in our study to allow any potential neighbouring weed species to be included, especially as they may be species associated with climates potentially similar to future climates of the NAR.

1

Table 1. Shires used to define the Northern Agricultural Region, agricultural buffer and rangeland buffer Region Shire Main town Northern Agricultural Region Carnamah Carnamah Chapman Valley Nabawa Coorow Coorow Dalwallinu Dalwallinu Dandaragan Dandaragan Geraldton–Greenough Geraldton Irwin Dongara Mingenew Mingenew Moora Moora Morawa Morawa Mullewa Mullewa Northampton Northampton Perenjori Perenjori Three Springs Three Springs Agricultural buffer Koorda Koorda Mount Marshall Bencubbin Wongan–Ballidu Wongan Hills Gingin Gingin Victoria Plains Calingiri Rangeland buffer Murchison (no town) Shark Bay Denham Yalgoo Yalgoo

2

Figure 1. Shires included in the Northern Agricultural Region (NAR) of Western Australia, and shires designated as the agricultural buffer and the rangeland buffer

Climate change in the Northern Agricultural Region

The NAR has not been the subject of specific analyses for climate change, and is usually included in studies covering a wider area, such as of the south-west of Australia. Weather records show a decline in early winter rains by up to 30% in the NAR (Hope et al. 2006); early winter is the time of crop seedling establishment. The most recent relevant analysis (Van Ommen & Morgan 2010) indicates that the significant decline of rainfall observed in the south-west is an unusual event most likely related to anthropogenic climate change affecting the meridional circulation south of Australia. However, that study did not include weather stations in the NAR, the nearest being Avondale (Figure S1 in supplementary data from Van Ommen & Morgan 2010). Temperatures in the south-west have increased over the past 50 years, particularly in autumn and winter (IOCI 2002). The OzCLIM Echam5 moderate CO2 scenario (CSIRO 2009) (Figure 2, Figure 3) illustrates the type of change expected by 2070. This model predicts temperature increases of 2.5°C in summer and 1.7°C in winter, and rainfall decreases of 5 mm (16%) in summer and 40 mm (23%) in winter.

3

A. Change in total winter rainfall (mm) by 2070 B. Change in total summer rainfall (mm) by 2070

C. Change in winter mean surface temperature D. Change in summer mean surface temperature (°C) by 2070 (°C) by 2070

Figure 2. Climate change projections for 2070 based on the ECHAM5/MPI-OM model, emissions scenario A1B and medium climate sensitivity (CSIRO 2009)

4

A. Summer total rainfall change (mm) between B. Winter total rainfall change (mm) between 2010 2010 and 2070 and 2070

C. Summer mean surface temperature change (°C) D. Winter mean surface temperature change (°C) between 2010 and 2070 between 2010 and 2070

Figure 3. Total rainfall and mean surface temperature change between 2010 and 2070 based on the ECHAM5/MPI-OM model, emissions scenario A1B and medium climate sensitivity (CSIRO 2009)

5

Selection of priority weeds from the Northern Agricultural Region

When confronted with a large number of detrimental weed species but with limited time and resources, there is a vital need for researchers to use a prioritisation system to make informed decisions on which weeds to investigate. Approaches such as that of Bebawi et al. (2002) and the Weeds of National Significance (WONS) (Thorp and Lynch 2000) have used input from stakeholder groups in order to shortlist large numbers of weeds and produce a reduced list that can be assessed in detail. In the case of Bebawi et al. (2002), an initial list of 246 weeds from the wet and dry tropics was reduced to a more manageable list of 50 weed species using a classification scoring system for priority: high (1.0), high/medium (0.75), medium (0.5), medium/low (0.25) and low (0.125). The scores produced by stakeholder groups were collated for each species, and the top 50 weeds proceeded to the next assessment stage. The WONS process involved each state or territory government nominating priority weeds through a series of workshops: a final list of 71 was assessed as potential WONS candidates (Thorp and Lynch 2000).

The next step in the prioritisation process is to quantitatively assess each weed from the shortlist in detail using a weed risk assessment (WRA) model. WRA is a decision support tool that uses standard, technical criteria to predict whether or not a plant species will become invasive. It compares the species invasiveness with the likely impacts of an invasion. WRA can not only be used to predict new weeds within a particular area, but can also enable researchers to prioritise control programs for existing weed species. Several models developed in Australia enable the ranking of existing weed species and the assessment of new potential weeds within a specific area, including:

• WONS (http://www.weeds.org.au/docs/WONS) • New South Wales Weed Risk Management System (http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/pests-weeds/weeds/wrm-system) • South Australian weed risk management guide (http://www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au/assets/files/SA_Weed_Risk_Management_Guide.pdf) • Northern Territory WRA system (http://www.nt.gov.au/nreta/natres/weeds/risk/index.html) • Victorian WRA method (http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/dpi/vro/vrosite.nsf/pages/lwm_pest_plants) • Future Farm Industries CRC Environmental Weed Risk Assessment Protocol (http://www.futurefarmcrc.com.au/weed_risks.html). These models are consistent with the National Post-Border Weed Risk Management Protocol (Virtue et al. 2006). They are also generally similar to one another, allowing comparability of individual species assessments. The Australian WRA process has been trialled in various countries and found to be widely suitable.

Our study used the 2008 South Australian weed risk management guide developed by the Animal and Plant Control Commission, in conjunction with the Animal and Plant Control Boards (Virtue 2008). The South Australian cropping system is climatically the most similar to that of the south-west of Australia and for that reason we considered that the guide was the most appropriate to use for weeds of the NAR. The guide uses a series of questions to determine the invasiveness, impact and potential distribution of a species, which are in turn multiplied to give a comparative weed risk from 0 to 1000. Invasiveness indicates the rate of spread, impacts determine the potential impact the weed has on economic, environmental and social factors, and potential distribution indicates the likely spread of the weed in the given land use. A feasibility of containment score is also determined from a series of questions combining the control cost, current distribution and persistence values of the species.

6

Control costs are the costs of detection, access and application, current distribution represents how prevalent the weed is, and persistence indicates the length of time required for weed eradication. Further details on each criterion are in the South Australian weed risk management guide (Virtue 2008). Once the comparative weed risk and feasibility of containment score are determined, a matrix is used to recommend a particular weed management action to undertake.

Our aim in selecting a priority list for the NAR was to develop a comprehensive list of weed species present within the NAR based on all known plant species in the region, and then to use a priority- based approach similar to Bebawi et al. (2002) to produce a shortlist that can be assessed by an expert panel. The top 20 priority weeds chosen by the panel were then subjected to a detailed WRA using criteria based on the South Australian weed risk management guide (Virtue 2008), and a final five species were selected for CLIMEX modelling. This comprehensive approach was thus designed to be independent of the authors’ knowledge or interests and to include information from as many sources as possible.

7

Objectives

This project aimed to assess the impact of climate change on agricultural weed spread by building on the distribution data collected from field surveys of the NAR and neighbouring areas. The research objectives included:

1. Applying a WRA model to determine the relative weed threats posed by 20 high-priority species in the survey.

2. Developing CLIMEX models for the five ‘riskiest’ species.

3. A prediction of the distribution of each weed species in 2070 under an IPCC4 scenario relevant to Australia.

4. Developing recommendations for adaptation responses to manage the changed weed threat.

With these objectives, this project is consistent with both the Australian Weeds Strategy objectives 1.4.1 and 1.2.6, and regional strategies through ARWA regional plans for the NAR.

8

Methodology

Collation of plant species list

Several field surveys and databases produced by the Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC), Curtin University (Curtin) and DAFWA (Table 2; Figure 4) were used to develop a complete list of plant species present within the NAR and buffer zones. Each species was then categorised according to its weed risk (high, medium or low) using criteria from Groves et al. (2003), Randall (2007) or a weed expert. If the species was not recorded by either source or was deemed a low risk, it was excluded from the assessment process (Figure 5). Species were then categorised into primarily agricultural or natural system weeds using criteria from Groves et al. (2003) or a weed expert. Additional information was documented for each species, including common name, family, whether the species was native or naturalised to Western Australia, life cycle and reproductive type using relevant literature sources such as Hussey et al. (2007), Groves et al. (2003), Randall (2007) and FloraBase (Western Australian Herbarium 2009).

Table 2. Surveys and databases used to collate a list of species present within the NAR and buffer zones Survey/database Sites Organisation Land use Reference 1 Wetland vegetation DEC aquatic (Lyons et al. 2004) 2 Terrestrial plant survey DEC terrestrial (Gibson et al. 2004) 3 NatureMap DEC terrestrial (DEC 2007) 4 Summer weeds survey 41 Curtin & DAFWA agricultural (Michael et al. 2010) 5 Field survey 461 Curtin & DAFWA agricultural (Michael, unpublished)

9

Figure 4. Map of the NAR indicating field locations from the summer (Michael et al. 2010) and GRDC weeds survey (Michael, unpublished)

Workshop to determine priority weed species

A one-day workshop was held on 7 August 2009 to assess and rank the list of high and medium risk agricultural and non-agricultural weeds within the NAR and surrounding buffer zones. The ranking was undertaken by an 11-member weed expert panel comprising researchers and extension staff from DAFWA, the Western Australian No-Tillage Farmers Association, CSIRO, the University of Western Australia, Curtin University and DEC. Panel members were first asked to examine the ‘medium risk agricultural weeds’ and ‘non-agricultural weeds’ lists and indicate whether they thought any of those species should be elevated to the ‘high risk agricultural weeds’ list used for final assessment. Members then scored their 20 priority weed species from the final ‘high risk agricultural weeds’ list using either a number from 1 to 20 (1 being highest priority) or a general rating (high, medium or low priority). Ratings were converted to numbers such that high = 1, medium = 2, low = 3. All weeds nominated as top 20 weeds were tallied to see which were of most interest to the group. Nominations for top 20 weeds were also used to produce an average weed risk score and a top weed risk index score.

Each member then rated every species with a current and future severity score of 0 to 5 (0 = no impact, 5 = highest severity). The future severity was based on a climate change scenario using the OzCLIM Echam5 moderate CO2 model (CSIRO 2009) for the NAR, which predicts a temperature increase of 2.5°C in summer and 1.7°C in winter, and a rainfall decrease of 5 mm (16%) in summer

10

and 40 mm (23%) in winter. If a member did not have expertise in a particular weed, they were asked to leave the score blank. Species were ranked using the average future severity score to determine the 20 ‘riskiest’ weeds under the climate change scenario. Discussions were then held as to whether the nominated weeds were priority weeds within agricultural systems in the NAR. For example, a species was removed from consideration if its life cycle made it unlikely to be a weed under current agricultural practices (for example, trees). Weed species were also removed if they were considered currently too widespread and abundant, so that the effect of climate change was unlikely to significantly affect the weed or its management. The final list of 20 riskiest weeds was endorsed by the panel at the conclusion of the workshop.

Weed risk assessment on 20 riskiest weeds

Detailed WRAs were conducted on each of the 20 selected species using the 2008 South Australian weed risk management guide (Virtue 2008). The land use chosen for each WRA was a crop–pasture rotation within the NAR. Management for crops was assumed to be pre-sowing cultivation or knockdown herbicide, pre-emergent spraying at sowing for grasses and broadleaf weeds, and one post-emergent grass/broadleaf spray. No herbicides were assumed to be used in the pasture phase.

Information used to complete each WRA was sourced from a wide variety of sources, including databases such as ISI Web of Knowledge, JSTOR, Agricola, Biological Abstracts and CAB abstracts. If reputable peer-reviewed publications were limited, more general sources were used, such as textbooks (Hussey et al. 2007; Parsons & Cuthbertson 2001), government technical notes (AgMemo, E-weed) and websites (Florabase 2009; AVH 2009). Once all available information was collated for a particular species, a group discussion (Michael, Scott, Yeoh and, if available, a weed expert who had researched the weed in question) was held to review and score each question. Input from additional weed experts and NAR landowners was also incorporated in the discussion. Any questions which were unable to be answered were entered as ‘Don’t know’. This equated to ‘0’ for the comparative weed risk scoring and the maximum mark for feasibility of containment scoring. A final comparative weed risk (CWR) and feasibility of containment (FOC) score was then produced for each species. These scores were used to select one of nine recommended weed management strategies by means of a management matrix developed by Virtue (2008).

Table 3. South Australian weed risk assessment guide management matrix (Virtue 2008) Feasibility of containment Negligible Low Medium High Very high > 113 > 56 > 31 > 14 < 14

Negligible Limited action Limited action Limited action Limited action Monitor < 13

Low Limited action Limited action Limited action Monitor Monitor < 39 isk r Medium Manage sites Manage sites Manage sites Protect sites Contain spread < 101

Weed Weed Destroy High Manage weed Manage weed Protect sites Contain spread infestations < 192 Alert Protect sites & Destroy Very high Manage weed Contain spread Eradicate manage weed infestations > 192

11

Results

Plant species list and priority weed species of the NAR

A total of 5536 discrete plant species were recorded within the NAR and buffer zones, from an initial collation of 7636 species generated from three main sources (Figure 5). Of those, 54 high risk agricultural weeds, 58 medium risk agricultural weeds (Appendix table 1) and 99 high/medium non-agricultural weeds (Appendix table 2) were identified using criteria from Groves et al. (2003), Randall (2007) or a weed expert. The species on the shortlist of 211 high and medium risk agricultural and non-agricultural weed species were investigated during the prioritisation workshop.

Panel members nominated 11 medium risk agricultural weeds and 17 non-agricultural weeds for inclusion on the high risk agricultural weeds list. A further three species not on any list were also nominated: Chloris truncata, Oncosiphon piluliferum and Oncosiphon suffruticosum. After discussion, all additional 31 species (Table 4) were elevated to the high risk agricultural weeds list, so that 85 species were examined (Table 5).

A total of 50 weed species were nominated at least once as ‘top 20 weeds’; however, 19 species were subsequently removed from consideration because they were deemed already too widespread and abundant and thus not priority weeds for this study (for example, Lolium rigidum and Avena fatua). Of the remaining weeds, the five species considered by the panel to currently have the most severe impact on agricultural systems within the NAR were Carthamus lanatus (3.0), Echium plantagineum (2.9), Rapistrum rugosum (2.8), Cucumis myriocarpus (2.7) and Hordeum marinum (2.7). Under the predicted climate change scenario, the five species considered to potentially have the most severe future impact on agricultural systems within the NAR were Chloris truncata (4.0), Asphodelus fistulosus (3.8), Solanum hoplopetalum (3.6), Carthamus lanatus (3.5) and Tribulus terrestris (3.5). The five weed species thought likely to experience the greatest increase in severity were Oncosiphon piluliferum (1.8), Chloris truncata (1.7), Oncosiphon suffruticosum (1.7), Xanthium spinosum (1.6) and Asphodelus fistulosus (1.5).

12

No information (6738)

Species recorded in Weed expert/Randall Gibson et al. (2004) assess as not risky (199) (2609) Natives NOT in Groves BUT in Randall (170) Weed expert/Randall assess as risky (13)

Exotics NOT in Groves *High risk BUT in Randall (42) Species recorded in agricultural weeds NatureBase (4889) Groves: high risk (4+5) (159) (54)

*Medium risk All recorded in Groves: medium risk (2+3) (169) Groves (548) agricultural weeds (58) 13

Groves: low risk (0+1) (313) *High+medium risk non-agricultural All plants recorded in weeds (99) Groves (93) Weed expert: not risky (0)

Species recorded in Not in Groves BUT agricultural surveys deemed as risky by (138) farmer survey/Randall (9) Weed expert: risky (9)

Not in Groves OR farmer survey OR Randall (36)

Figure 5. Flow chart showing the decision process for reduction of weed list (* indicates discrete species)

Table 4. Additional species included in the final ‘high risk agricultural weeds’ list Nomin- Primarily Species Common name Native Initial risk ations agricultural? 1 Acetosa vesicaria rosy dock high no 1 Argemone ochroleuca Mexican poppy high no 2 Asphodelus fistulosus Onion weed high no 1 Boerhavia coccinea Tarvine Native medium yes 10 Brassica tournefortii wild turnip high no 8 Bromus diandrus Great brome high no 4 Bromus hordeaceus soft brome high no 6 Bromus rubens red brome high no 3 Carrichtera annua Ward’s weed high no 3 Cenchrus ciliaris buffel grass medium no 1 Chloris truncata windmill grass Native n/a n/a 8 Conyza bonariensis flaxleaf fleabane high no 1 Emex spinosa lesser jack medium no 3 Eragrostis curvula African lovegrass high no 3 Helianthus annuus sunflower medium yes 1 Hordeum glaucum northern barley grass medium no 7 Hordeum leporinum barley grass medium yes 2 Hordeum marinum sea barley grass medium yes 1 Lactuca serriola prickly lettuce medium yes 5 Lupinus cosentinii blue lupin high no 7 Malva parviflora marshmallow high no 4 Mesembryanthemum crystallinum iceplant medium no 1 Oncosiphon piluliferum matricaria n/a n/a 1 Oncosiphon suffruiticosum Calomba daisy n/a n/a 2 Solanum elaeagnifolium silverleaf nightshade medium yes 7 Solanum hoplopetalum Afghan thistle Native medium yes 5 Tribulus terrestris caltrop medium yes 1 Verbesina encelioides crown beard medium yes 5 Vulpia bromoides squirrel tail fescue medium yes 3 Vulpia muralis wall fescue medium yes 4 Vulpia myuros rat’s tail fescue high no

14

Table 5. High risk agricultural weeds in the NAR. Species highlighted in yellow were deemed ‘too common’ for inclusion in the WRA. Weed risk Top weed Current severity Future severity Change Common name Nominations Score Species Family risk index in (n = native) (top 20 weed) Av. Av. Av. (1–20) score Response Response severity (0–5) (0–5) Chloris truncata Poaceae windmill grass (n) 4 11.6 4.2 2.3 3 4.0 3 1.7 Asphodelus fistulosus Asphodelaceae onion weed 3 10.2 2.8 2.0 5 3.8 4 1.5 Solanum hoplopetalum Solanaceae Afghan thistle (n) 6 9.3 5.0 2.5 9 3.6 8 1.0 Carthamus lanatus saffron thistle 6 8.8 4.8 3.0 8 3.5 8 0.5 Tribulus terrestris Zygophyllaceae caltrop 4 8.8 3.2 2.4 8 3.5 7 0.9 Chondrilla juncea Asteraceae skeleton weed 7 9.4 6.0 2.0 7 3.4 7 1.4 Conyza bonariensis Asteraceae flaxleaf fleabane 5 15.0 6.8 2.1 7 3.3 6 1.3 Cucumis myriocarpus Cucurbitaceae prickly paddy melon 10 6.5 5.9 2.7 9 3.3 9 0.6 Hordeum marinum Poaceae sea barley 2 9.5 1.7 2.7 3 3.3 3 0.7 Oncosiphon suffruiticosum Asteraceae Calomba daisy 1 8.0 0.7 1.3 4 3.3 3 1.7

15 Rapistrum rugosum Brassicaceae turnipweed 8 9.7 7.0 2.8 9 3.3 9 0.6

Polygonum aviculare wireweed 7 6.0 3.8 2.3 9 3.3 9 0.9 Citrullus lanatus Cucurbitaceae Afghan melon 10 7.2 6.5 2.6 10 3.3 10 0.7 Oncosiphon piluliferum Asteraceae matricaria 5 9.5 4.3 1.5 4 3.3 4 1.8 Echium plantagineum Boraginaceae Paterson’s curse 6 9.2 5.0 2.9 7 3.2 6 0.4 Acetosa vesicaria Polygonaceae rosy dock 3 11.2 3.0 1.7 5 3.0 5 1.3 Carrichtera annua Brassicaceae Ward’s weed 1 14.5 1.3 1.6 4 3.0 3 1.0 Mesembryanthemum crystallinum Aizoaceae iceplant 6 8.8 4.8 2.3 6 2.9 4 1.0 Cenchrus ciliaris Poaceae buffel grass 1 14.0 1.3 2.0 5 2.7 5 0.7 Heliotropium europaeum Boraginaceae common heliotrope 3 6.8 1.9 1.7 7 2.6 7 0.9 Eragrostis cilianensis Poaceae stinkgrass none 0.0 1.9 4 2.6 4 0.8 Lupinus cosentinii Fabaceae blue lupin none 0.0 2.5 7 2.5 4 0.3 Amaranthus albus Amaranthaceae tumbleweed none 0.0 1.8 6 2.5 6 0.7 Malva parviflora Malvaceae marshmallow 4 10.5 3.8 2.1 9 2.4 8 0.4 Sisymbrium orientale Brassicaceae Indian hedge mustard 1 1.0 0.1 2.3 7 2.4 7 0.1 Verbesina encelioides Asteraceae crown beard 1 13.0 1.2 2.3 3 2.3 3 0.0

Weed risk Top weed Current severity Future severity Change Common name Nominations Score Species Family risk index in (n = native) (top 20 weed) Av. Av. Av. (1–20) score Response Response severity (0–5) (0–5) Cirsium vulgare Asteraceae spear thistle none 0.0 2.1 7 2.3 7 0.1 Emex spinosa Polygonaceae lesser jack 3 5.0 1.4 1.2 6 2.2 5 1.0 Xanthium spinosum Asteraceae Bathurst burr 3 8.3 2.3 0.6 5 2.2 5 1.6 Pennisetum clandestinum Poaceae kikuyu grass 1 2.0 0.2 1.6 6 2.0 6 0.4 Sisymbrium irio Brassicaceae London rocket 2 9.3 1.7 1.9 8 2.0 8 0.1 Amaranthus powellii Amaranthaceae Powell’s amaranth none 0.0 2.0 3 2.0 3 0.0 Amaranthus viridis Amaranthaceae green amaranth none 0.0 2.0 3 2.0 3 0.0 Avena sterilis Poaceae sterile oat none 0.0 1.7 3 2.0 3 0.3 Bromus hordeaceus Poaceae soft brome none 0.0 2.3 6 2.0 4 0.3 Carduus pycnocephalus Asteraceae slender thistle none 0.0 2.1 7 2.0 7 -0.1 Cirsium arvense Asteraceae Canada thistle none 0.0 1.5 2 2.0 2 0.5

16 Stachys arvensis Lamiaceae staggerweed none 0.0 1.8 3 2.0 3 0.2

Helianthus annuus Asteraceae sunflower 1 4.0 0.4 1.4 7 1.8 6 0.3 Sinapis alba Brassicaceae white mustard none 0.0 1.8 3 1.8 3 0.0 Juncus bufonius Juncaceae toadrush none 0.0 1.9 6 1.7 6 -0.3 Lactuca serriola Asteraceae prickly lettuce 1 2.0 0.2 1.3 7 1.7 6 0.3 Onopordum acaulon Asteraceae stemless onopordon none 0.0 0.8 5 1.6 5 0.8 Solanum elaeagnifolium Solanaceae silverleaf nightshade 1 18.5 1.7 1.4 4 1.5 3 0.0 Carduus tenuiflorus Asteraceae sheep thistle 1 10.0 0.9 1.7 6 1.5 6 -0.2 Euphorbia hirta Euphorbiaceae asthma plant none 0.0 0.3 3 1.5 2 1.0 Spergula arvensis Caryophyllaceae corn spurrey none 0.0 1.0 4 1.5 4 0.5 Moraea miniata Iridaceae two-leaf cape tulip 1 2.0 0.2 1.7 8 1.4 8 -0.3 Chenopodium album Chenopodiaceae fat hen none 0.0 1.6 7 1.4 7 -0.1 conglomeratus Polygonaceae clustered dock none 0.0 1.4 4 1.4 4 0.0 Sinapis arvensis Brassicaceae charlock none 0.0 1.3 3 1.3 3 0.0 Anagallis arvensis Primulaceae pimpernel 1 11.5 1.0 1.1 5 1.2 5 0.1 Acetosella vulgaris Polygonaceae sorrel none 0.0 1.2 5 1.0 5 -0.2

Weed risk Top weed Current severity Future severity Change Common name Nominations Score Species Family risk index in (n = native) (top 20 weed) Av. Av. Av. (1–20) score Response Response severity (0–5) (0–5) Buglossoides arvensis Boraginaceae corn gromwell none 0.0 1.0 3 1.0 3 0.0 Digitaria sanguinalis Poaceae crab grass none 0.0 1.0 4 1.0 4 0.0 Polygonum bellardii Polygonaceae none 0.0 1.0 1 1.0 1 0.0 Salvia reflexa Lamiaceae mintweed none 0.0 1.0 6 1.0 5 -0.2 Oxalis corniculata Oxalidaceae yellow wood sorrel none 0.0 1.1 5 0.9 5 -0.2 Boerhavia coccinea Nyctaginaceae tarvine (n) none 0.0 0.9 4 0.8 3 0.0 Cyperus brevifolius Cyperaceae kyllinga weed none 0.0 0.5 4 0.8 4 0.3 Alopecurus geniculatus Poaceae marsh foxtail none 0.0 0.3 3 0.7 3 0.3 Alopecurus pratensis Poaceae meadow foxtail none 0.0 0.3 3 0.7 3 0.3 Ammi majus Apiaceae Bishop’s weed none 0.0 0.7 3 0.7 3 0.0 Hypericum perforatum Clusiaceae St John’s wort none 0.0 0.7 6 0.7 6 0.0

17 Mentha pulegium Lamiaceae pennyroyal none 0.0 1.0 5 0.6 5 -0.4

Plantago major Plantaginaceae greater plantain none 0.0 0.4 4 0.4 4 0.0 Lolium rigidum Poaceae annual ryegrass 6 10.3 5.6 4.6 10 4.7 10 0.1 Raphanus raphanistrum Brassicaceae wild radish 7 11.9 7.5 4.6 10 4.5 10 -0.1 Bromus diandrus Poaceae great brome 5 6.3 2.9 3.4 8 4.3 7 0.8 Avena fatua Poaceae wild oat 6 11.3 6.1 3.6 10 4.0 10 0.4 Emex australis Polygonaceae doublegee 10 7.0 6.3 3.7 9 3.9 9 0.3 Hordeum leporinum Poaceae barley grass 6 8.3 4.5 3.3 10 3.8 9 0.7 Lupinus angustifolius Fabaceae narrowleaf lupin 1 3.0 0.3 3.5 6 3.6 6 0.1 Vulpia bromoides Poaceae squirrel tail fescue none 0.0 2.6 7 3.5 5 1.2 Brassica tournefortii Brassicaceae wild turnip 7 10.0 6.4 2.9 9 3.3 8 0.3 Arctotheca calendula Asteraceae capeweed 5 7.4 3.4 3.1 10 3.0 10 -0.1 Bromus rubens Poaceae red brome none 0.0 2.4 5 2.7 3 0.7 Hordeum glaucum Poaceae northern barley grass 1 12.0 1.1 2.0 4 2.6 4 0.6 Vulpia myuros Poaceae rat’s tail fescue 2 5.5 1.0 2.1 5 2.5 2 0.5 Dittrichia graveolens Asteraceae stinkwort 1 1.0 0.1 1.8 8 2.3 8 0.6

Weed risk Top weed Current severity Future severity Change Common name Nominations Score Species Family risk index in (n = native) (top 20 weed) Av. Av. Av. (1–20) score Response Response severity (0–5) (0–5) Acacia farnesiana Fabaceae mimosa bush 1 12.0 1.1 1.1 5 2.0 4 0.9 Vulpia muralis Poaceae wall fescue 1 9.0 0.8 2.3 4 2.0 2 0.5 Eragrostis curvula Poaceae African lovegrass 2 17.5 3.2 1.9 8 1.9 7 -0.1 Argemone ochroleuca Papaveraceae Mexican poppy 1 10.5 1.0 0.9 5 1.6 4 0.5 Sorghum halepense Poaceae Johnson grass 1 1.0 0.1 0.6 5 1.3 5 0.7 182 8.9 146.5 2.1 490 2.5 453 0.4 18

Table 6. Weed risk assessment category scores for top 20 ‘riskiest’ weeds Comparative Feasibility of Potential Current Species Invasiveness Impacts Control costs Persistence weed risk containment distribution distribution Don’t knows Don’t knows Acetosa vesicaria 5.3 1.6 4.0 3.3 1.7 6.4 0 0 Asphodelus fistulosus 4.7 3.2 4.0 3.3 0.4 6.4 1 1 Carrichtera annua 5.3 1.6 4.0 4.0 0.0 5.5 1 0 Carthamus lanatus 7.3 4.2 8.0 2.7 0.9 6.4 3 0 Cenchrus ciliaris 9.3 2.6 8.0 6.7 2.5 8.2 0 0 Chloris truncata 6.0 2.6 6.0 5.3 0.9 6.4 3 0 Chondrilla juncea 6.7 2.6 8.0 7.3 0.9 8.2 0 0 Citrullus lanatus 5.3 4.7 8.0 4.7 6.7 7.3 0 0 Conyza bonariensis 8.0 3.2 8.0 5.3 0.9 7.3 0 0 Cucumis myriocarpus 5.3 4.2 8.0 5.3 6.7 6.4 0 1 Echium plantagineum 6.7 2.6 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.4 0 0 19 Heliotropium europaeum 5.3 6.3 8.0 6.0 0.0 7.3 0 0

Hordeum marinum 5.3 1.6 4.0 5.3 1.3 4.5 4 0 Mesembryanthemum crystallinum 3.3 3.7 6.0 4.7 0.9 6.4 0 1 Oncosiphon piluliferum 6.7 1.6 8.0 4.7 0.0 6.4 2 0 Oncosiphon suffruticosum 5.3 1.6 8.0 5.3 0.0 5.5 2 0 Polygonum aviculare 6.0 2.6 8.0 5.3 2.5 7.3 0 0 Rapistrum rugosum 6.0 4.2 8.0 4.0 0.9 7.3 1 0 Solanum hoplopetalum 6.0 3.7 6.0 8.0 2.1 7.3 1 0 Tribulus terrestris 5.3 5.8 8.0 5.3 2.5 6.4 0 0

The final list of the 20 riskiest weeds (Table 5 highlighted) was endorsed by the panel at the conclusion of the workshop. These species belong to 10 different families, with the Asteraceae (five species) and Poaceae (three species) families being the most common.

Weed risk assessments on 20 riskiest weeds

The WRA determined that, within crop–pasture rotation systems of the NAR, Cenchrus ciliaris (9.7) and Conyza bonariensis (8.0) were the most invasive species and Heliotropium europaeum (6.3) and Tribulus terrestris (5.8) had the greatest potential impact (Table 6). The likely future distribution of each species under climate change ranged from 40% to 80% of the area, and most weeds were suitable to inhabit 80% of the land use. Species with the highest control costs were Solanum hoplopetalum (8.0) and Chondrilla juncea (7.3). Citrullus lanatus (6.7) and Cucumis myriocarpus (6.7) were the most widespread weed species, invading between 60% and 80% of the current land use. The most persistent species were Cenchrus ciliaris (8.2) and Chondrilla juncea (8.2). Several species (Carthamus lanatus, Chloris truncata and Hordeum marinum) recorded three or more ‘Don’t know’ scores.

Weed species that obtained a ‘very high’ comparative weed risk (CWR) score were Heliotropium europaeum (269), Carthamus lanatus (247), Tribulus terrestris (247), Citrullus lanatus (202), Conyza bonariensis (202), Rapistrum rugosum (202) and Cenchrus ciliaris (196) (Table 7). Weed species with a ‘negligible’ feasibility of containment (FOC) score were Citrullus lanatus (226), Cucumis myriocarpus (226), Echium plantagineum (191), Cenchrus ciliaris (136) and Solanum hoplopetalum (121).

Fully detailed WRAs for the 20 riskiest weeds are available from the authors.

Table 7. Comparative weed risk (CWR) and feasibility of containment (FOC) scores for the 20 riskiest weeds Species CWR Rating FOC Rating Action

Acetosa vesicaria 34 Low 35 Medium Limited action Asphodelus fistulosus 59 Medium 9 Very high Contain spread Carrichtera annua 34 Low 1 Very high Monitor Carthamus lanatus 247 Very high 16 High Destroy infestations Cenchrus ciliaris 196 Very high 136 Negligible Manage weed Chloris truncata 95 Medium 31 Medium Protect sites Chondrilla juncea 140 High 55 Medium Protect sites Citrullus lanatus 202 Very high 226 Negligible Manage weed Conyza bonariensis 202 Very high 36 Medium Contain spread Cucumis myriocarpus 180 High 226 Negligible Manage weed Echium plantagineum 105 High 191 Negligible Manage weed Heliotropium europaeum 269 Very high 0 Very high Eradicate Hordeum marinum 34 Low 30 High Limited action Mesembryanthemum crystallinum 74 Medium 27 High Protect sites Oncosiphon piluliferum 84 Medium 1 Very high Contain spread Oncosiphon suffruticosum 67 Medium 1 Very high Contain spread Polygonum aviculare 126 High 97 Low Manage weed Rapistrum rugosum 202 Very high 27 High Destroy infestations Solanum hoplopetalum 133 High 121 Negligible Manage weed Tribulus terrestris 247 Very high 85 Low Protect sites & manage weeds

20

Implications

An extensive range of flora is present in the NAR and surrounding buffer shires—a total of 5536 distinct species were identified from this study. Using this initial inventory, we developed a shortlist of 211 priority weed species for the NAR, in both agricultural and non-agricultural situations. This process used standardised quantitative criteria from two reputable Australian weed databases: The introduced flora of Australia and its weed status (Randall 2007) and Weed categories for natural and agricultural ecosystem management (Groves et al. 2003). A workshop involving local weed expertise with knowledge of the NAR further reduced the priority list to 85 ‘high risk agricultural weeds’ and ranked them based on future weed risk under the OzCLIM Echam5 moderate CO2 climate change scenario (CSIRO 2009) to produce a final list of the top 20 ‘riskiest’ weeds for the NAR.

Other similar studies such as Bebawi et al. (2002) and the WONS process (Thorp and Lynch 2000) have relied heavily on stakeholder input in order to produce both an initial weed inventory and a shortlist. This dependency on ‘expert input’ may have negatively affected results, as the process was wholly reliant on the current knowledge of the stakeholders involved, whereas using published databases such as those above allowed transparency and reduced subjectivity in the weed selection process. We believe that using expert input only after a shortlist of species was produced using objective criteria greatly improved our prioritisation process, as most experts had knowledge of the large majority of weeds considered. Future weed prioritisations would benefit from the inclusion of similar methodology to subjectively select species for detailed WRAs.

Generally, very few Australian weeds have originated from the native flora (Michael 1994). However, the shortlist of 85 high risk agricultural weeds included several native Western Australian species, Solanum hoplopetalum, Chloris truncata and Boerhavia coccinea. These opportunistic species have spread beyond their native range and invaded agricultural fields.

The South Australian WRA model allowed the use of transparent and objective criteria to comprehensively assess the selected 20 weed species. This model is also consistent with the National Post-Border Weed Risk Management Protocol (Virtue et al. 2006) and will enable comparisons of individual species assessments.

Under a future climate change scenario of annual temperature increases of 1.7–2.5°C and rainfall decreases of 5 mm (16%) in summer and 40 mm (23%) in winter, it is expected that each of the 20 species selected for detailed WRAs would have a significant impact on the crop–pasture rotation systems of the NAR. However, some species produced higher weed risk scores than others under this scenario, such as Heliotropium europaeum, Tribulus terrestris and Carthamus lanatus. Heliotropium europaeum is a highly toxic and competitive summer-growing weed (Lanigan et al. 1978; Howell et al. 1991; Hill et al. 1997) that can produce almost 1.5 million seeds per square metre (Sheppard et al. 1996a). Tribulus terrestris is also a summer-growing weed and can produce up 16,500 spiny burrs per square metre (Boydston 1990), which are readily disseminated by animals or rubber-tyred vehicles (Squires 1979). Summer fallow weeds can significantly reduce subsequent winter crop yields; for example, T. terrestris causes a minimum of 10% yield penalty if not controlled during the fallow period (Fromm and Grieger 2002). Carthamus lanatus is a competitive winter annual with high seed longevity (Quinlivan and Peirce 1968) and has been estimated to cost Australian agriculture around $111 million per year (Grace et al. 2004). It is currently a declared weed of Western Australia, so any movement of plants or seeds is prohibited (DAFWA 2008).

Detailed WRAs of Acetosa vesicaria, Carrichtera annua and Hordeum marinum indicated that they would have a low weed risk in crop–pasture rotations in the NAR under the projected climate change scenario. However, these species are not typically agricultural weeds, so the WRA may have underestimated their potential impact. Acetosa vesicaria is a weed of native vegetation and rehabilitated minesites in semi-arid and arid regions of Australia (Marchant et al. 1987; Schatral and

21

Osborne 2006; Schatral et al. 2008). Carrichtera annua is predominantly a weed of disturbed native areas, although it can ‘crowd out’ pasture species (Cunningham et al. 1992). Hordeum marinum is a little-known member of the Hordeum , which includes several widespread weedy species (for example, H. leporinum).

Based on the feasibility of containment score, we can determine what course of action could be taken for control of each weed. For example, species that are currently widespread and difficult to control, such as Citrullus lanatus and Cucumis myriocarpus, have a negligible rating, which suggests that containment is very unlikely and control should be based on ongoing management. Species such as Oncosiphon piluliferum and Heliotropium europaeum, which are not currently present within the NAR, have a very high chance of containment; therefore, the course of action is to restrain the spread.

Selection of five weed species for CLIMEX modelling

Due to project constraints, only five species could be selected for CLIMEX modelling. Although we were restricted to selecting species based on seed availability, we also wanted to study a diverse range of weed types. Therefore, we chose Chloris truncata (stoloniferous perennial grass), Conyza bonariensis (annual herb with limited or no seed dormancy), Citrullus lanatus (annual summer- growing fleshy-fruited climber), Rapistrum rugosum (annual winter-growing herb) and Solanum hoplopetalum (clonal perennial herb).

22

Recommendations

Priorities for future research include the following.

1. This report focuses on the Northern Agricultural Region of south-west Australia and developed methodologies for determining weed risk under future climates. The main priority for future research is to extend this study to include an assessment applicable to the whole cropping region of Western Australia.

2. The risk assessments are based on the ability of weeds to grow in different climates. Each risk assessment could be augmented by overlays of the weed’s response to different soil types, agricultural practices and other non-climatic factors. However, research would be needed to establish the relevance of those factors to the growth and survival of each weed species.

23

Appendix: Weed species lists

24

Appendix table 1. Agricultural weeds of high and medium weed risk present within the NAR and buffer zones Ag Range Species Common name Family NAR Risk Lifecycle Reproduction buffer buffer Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. mimosa bush Fabaceae notfound notfound Low High tree Acetosella vulgaris Fourr. sorrel Polygonaceae notfound Med notfound High perennial herb Fl Jun-Dec Adonis microcarpa DC. pheasants eye Ranunculaceae notfound Med notfound Med annual herb Fl Aug-Oct Aerva javanica (Burm.f.) Schult. kapok bush Amaranthaceae notfound notfound Low Med perennial herb Fl Jan-Oct Alopecurus geniculatus L. marsh foxtail Poaceae Low notfound Low High perennial grass Fl Aug-Sep Alopecurus pratensis L. meadow foxtail Poaceae notfound notfound Low High perennial grass Fl Sep-Dec Amaranthus albus L. tumbleweed Amaranthaceae Med notfound notfound High annual herb Fl Dec-May Amaranthus mitchellii Benth. boggabri weed (n) Amaranthaceae notfound notfound Med Med annual herb Fl May Amaranthus powellii S.Watson Powell’s amaranth Amaranthaceae notfound notfound Low High annual herb Fl Feb-Mar Amaranthus viridis L. green amaranth Amaranthaceae Med notfound notfound High annual Fl Nov-Jun, monoecious Ambrosia psilostachya DC. perennial ragweed Asteraceae notfound Med notfound Med perennial herb Fl Feb-May, rhizomes Ammi majus L. Bishop’s weed Apiaceae Low notfound notfound High annual/biennial herb Fl Oct-Dec Anagallis arvensis L. pimpernel Primulaceae High High High High annual herb Fl Feb-Dec 25 Arctotheca calendula (L.) Levyns capeweed Asteraceae High High Med High annual herb Fl Aug-Nov

Asparagus officinalis L. asparagus Asparagaceae notfound Med notfound Med perennial herb Fl Oct-Jan, rhizomes, tuberous Avena fatua L. wild oat Poaceae High High Low High annual grass Fl Aug-Dec Avena sterilis L. sterile oat Poaceae Med notfound Low High annual grass Fl Jul-Oct Bartsia trixago L. Scrophulariaceae High Med notfound Med annual herb Fl Sep-Jan Boerhavia coccinea Mill. tarvine (n) Nyctaginaceae Med Med High Med annual/perennial herb Fl Jan-Dec Brassica napus L. volunteer canola Brassicaceae Med High notfound Med annual/biennial herb Fl Aug-Sep Buglossoides arvensis (L.) I.M.Johnst. corn gromwell Boraginaceae Med notfound notfound High annual herb Flv Jul-No Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. Sheppard’s purse Brassicaceae Med notfound notfound Med annual herb Fl Jul-Nov Carduus pycnocephalus L. slender thistle Asteraceae notfound Med notfound High annual herb Fl Oct-Dec Carduus tenuiflorus Curtis sheep thistle Asteraceae notfound Med notfound High annual/biennial herb Fl Sep-Nov Carthamus lanatus L. saffron thistle Asteraceae High Med notfound High annual herb Fl Dec-Apr Cenchrus echinatus L. Walkaway burr Poaceae High Med Low Med annual/perennial Fl Jan-Aug rhizomous Chenopodium album L. fat hen Chenopodiaceae Med Med Low High annual herb Fl Mar-Apr/Oct-Dec Chenopodium murale L. nettleleaf goosefoot Chenopodiaceae Med Med High Med annual herb Fl Apr-Dec Chondrilla juncea L. skeleton weed Asteraceae Med Med notfound High biennial/perennial herb Fl Oct-Feb, rhizomes

Ag Range Species Common name Family NAR Risk Lifecycle Reproduction buffer buffer Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Canada thistle Asteraceae Low notfound notfound High perennial herb rhizomous Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. spear thistle Asteraceae notfound Med notfound High biennial herb Fl Jan-Dec Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad. Cucurbitaceae Med High Low Med perennial herb/climber Fl Jan-Oct, tuberous Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai Afghan melon Cucurbitaceae High notfound notfound High annual herb/climber Fl Jan-Dec Cotula australis (Spreng.) Hook.f. common cotula Asteraceae High Med notfound Med annual herb Fl Feb/May-Nov Crepis capillaris (L.) Wallr. smooth hawksbeard Asteraceae Med notfound notfound Med annual/biennial herb Fl Dec-Jan Cucumis myriocarpus Naudin prickly paddy melon Cucurbitaceae High High Low High annual herb Fl Jan-May Cyperus brevifolius (Rottb.) Hassk. kyllinga weed Cyperaceae notfound Med notfound High perennial sedge Fl Jan-Dec, rhizomous Cyperus rotundus L. nutgrass Cyperaceae Low Med notfound Med perennial sedge Fl Apr-Jul, rhizomous, tuberous Dactylis glomerata L. cocksfoot Poaceae notfound Med notfound Med perennial grass Fl Jan-Mar Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willd. button grass Poaceae High notfound notfound Med annual grass Fl Mar/Jul-Sep Datura inoxia Mill. Solanaceae Low notfound notfound Med annual herb Fl Dec-Aug Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. crab grass Poaceae notfound Med notfound High annual grass Fl Dec-May Diplotaxis muralis (L.) DC. wall rocket Brassicaceae Med notfound Low Med annual/biennial herb Fl Jan-Aug 26 Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter stinkwort Asteraceae High Med notfound High annual herb Fl Jan-Nov

Echium plantagineum L. Paterson’s curse Boraginaceae High High Low High annual/biennial herb Fl Sep-Jan Emex australis Steinh. doublegee Polygonaceae High High High High annual herb Fl Jan-Dec Eragrostis cilianensis (All.) Janch. stinkgrass Poaceae Low Med notfound High annual herb Fl Nov-Jan/Apr-May Eremocarpus setiger (Hook.) Benth. doveweed Euphorbiaceae Med notfound notfound Med annual herb Euphorbia hirta L. asthma plant Euphorbiaceae Med notfound notfound High annual herb Fl Jan-Oct Euphorbia paralias L. sea spurge Euphorbiaceae notfound Med notfound Med perennial herb Fl Oct-Jun Festuca arundinacea Schreb. tall fescue Poaceae Low notfound notfound Med perennial grass rhizomous Foeniculum vulgare Mill. fennel Apiaceae notfound Med notfound Med perennial herb Fl Jul-Jan Gomphocarpus fruticosus (L.) W.T.Aiton narrowleaf cottonbush Asclepiadaceae notfound Med notfound Med perennial herb/shrub Fl Feb-Jul Helianthus annuus L. sunflower Asteraceae Med notfound Low Med annual herb Fl Aug-Apr Heliotropium europaeum L. common heliotrope Boraginaceae notfound notfound Low High annual herb Fl Jan-Dec Holcus lanatus L. Yorkshire fog Poaceae notfound Med notfound Med perennial grass Fl Oct-Mar/Aug Hordeum leporinum Link barley grass Poaceae High High Low Med annual grass Fl Sep-Oct Hordeum marinum Huds. Poaceae Med Med notfound Med annual grass Hypericum perforatum L. St John’s wort Clusiaceae notfound notfound Low High perennial herb Fl Nov-Dec

Ag Range Species Common name Family NAR Risk Lifecycle Reproduction buffer buffer Juncus bufonius L. toadrush Juncaceae High High High High annual herb Fl Sep-Jan Lactuca serriola L. prickly lettuce Asteraceae Med Med notfound Med annual/biennial herb Fl Oct-Feb Lamium amplexicaule L. deadnettle Lamiaceae Low notfound notfound Med annual herb Fl Aug-Oct Lolium multiflorum Lam. Italian ryegrass Poaceae Low Med notfound Med annual/perennial grass Fl Oct-Dec Lolium rigidum Gaudin annual ryegrass Poaceae High High notfound High annual grass Fl Sep-Nov Lupinus angustifolius L. narrowleaf lupin Fabaceae Med Med notfound High annual herb Fl Aug-Nov Melilotus indicus (L.) All. common melilot Fabaceae Med Med Low Med annual/biennial herb Fl Aug-May Mentha pulegium L. pennyroyal Lamiaceae notfound Med notfound High perennial herb Fl Sep/Dec-Mar, rhizomes Moraea miniata Andrews two-leaf cape tulip Iridaceae Med Med notfound High perennial herb Fl Jul-Nov, corms Onopordum acaulon L. stemless onopordon Asteraceae Low notfound notfound High biennial herb Fl Jul/Oct-Dec Orobanche minor Sm. lesser broom rape Scrophulariaceae High High Low Med parasitic herb Fl Sep-Dec Oxalis corniculata L. yellow wood sorrel Oxalidaceae Med Med Low High annual herb Fl May/Aug-Nov Parentucellia latifolia (L.) Caruel common bartsia Scrophulariaceae High High Low Med annual herb Fl Aug-Dec Parentucellia viscosa (L.) Caruel sticky bartsia Scrophulariaceae Med Med notfound Med annual/biennial herb Fl Aug-Feb 27 Paspalum dilatatum Poir. Poaceae Med Med notfound Med perennial grass Fl Oct-Apr, rhizomes

Pennisetum clandestinum Chiov. kikuyu grass Poaceae Low notfound notfound High perennial grass Fl Oct-Mar, rhizomes, stolons Pennisetum villosum Fresen. feathertop Poaceae Low notfound notfound Med perennial grass Fl Feb-Oct, rhizomes Plantago major L. greater plantain Plantaginaceae notfound Med notfound High perennial herb Fl Oct-Feb Poa annua L. winter grass Poaceae Med Med Low Med annual grass Fl Aug-Feb Polygonum aviculare L. wireweed Polygonaceae High High notfound High annual herb Fl Oct-May Polygonum bellardii All. Polygonaceae notfound Med notfound High herb Fl Nov-Mar Polygonum plebeium R. Br. small knotweed (n) Polygonaceae notfound notfound Low Med annual herb Fl Jun/Nov Raphanus raphanistrum L. wild radish Brassicaceae High High Med High annual herb Fl Apr-Nov Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All. turnipweed Brassicaceae High notfound notfound High annual/biennial herb Fl May/Aug-Nov Reseda lutea L. cutleaf mingonette Resedaceae Low notfound notfound Med perennial herb Fl Nov-Dec Rumex brownii Campd. swamp dock Polygonaceae Low notfound notfound Med perennial herb Fl Oct-Dec/Apr-May Rumex conglomeratus Murray clustered dock Polygonaceae notfound Med notfound High perennial herb Fl Oct-Feb Salsola australis R.Br. rolypoly (n) Chenopodiaceae High Med Med Med shrub Fl Mar-Sep Salvia reflexa Hornem. mintweed Lamiaceae Med notfound notfound High annual herb Fl Oct-Apr Sinapis alba L. white mustard Brassicaceae Med notfound notfound High annual herb

Ag Range Species Common name Family NAR Risk Lifecycle Reproduction buffer buffer Sinapis arvensis L. charlock Brassicaceae Low notfound notfound High annual herb Sisymbrium irio L. London rocket Brassicaceae Med High Med High annual/biennial herb Fl Jul-Dec Sisymbrium orientale L. Indian hedge mustard Brassicaceae High High Med High annual/biennial herb Fl Mar-Nov Solanum elaeagnifolium Cav. silverleaf nightshade Solanaceae notfound Med notfound Med perennial herb Fl Nov-Mar Solanum hoplopetalum Bitter & Summerh Afghan thistle (n) Solanaceae High High notfound Med perennial herb Fl Jan-Mar/Sep-Nov, clonal Solanum hystrix R.Br. Afghan thistle Solanaceae Low notfound notfound Med perennial herb clonal Solanum nigrum L. black berry nightshade Solanaceae Med Med High Med perennial herb/shrub Fl Jan-Dec Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Johnson grass Poaceae Low notfound notfound High perennial grass Fl Aug-Feb Spergula arvensis L. corn spurrey Caryophyllaceae Med Med notfound High annual herb Fl Jun-Nov Stachys arvensis L. staggerweed Lamiaceae Low notfound notfound High annual herb Fl Apr-Oct Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg. dandelion Asteraceae notfound Med notfound Med perennial herb Fl Jan-Dec Tribulus terrestris L. caltrop Zygophyllaceae High High Low Med annual herb Fl Jan-Dec Trifolium lappaceum L. Fabaceae notfound Med notfound Med annual herb Fl Nov-Dec Trifolium scabrum L. rough clover Fabaceae notfound Med notfound Med annual herb Fl Sep-Nov 28 Triticum aestivum L. volunteer wheat Poaceae High High notfound Med annual grass Fl Apr-Aug

Typha domingensis Pers. bulrush Typhaceae Med Med Low Med perennial herb Fl May-Sep, rhizomes Typha orientalis C.Presl bulrush Typhaceae Low notfound notfound Med perennial herb Fl Nov-Jan, rhizomes Urtica urens L. small nettle Urticaceae Med notfound notfound Med annual herb Fl Jul-Nov Verbascum virgatum Stokes twiggy mullein Scrophulariaceae Low Med notfound Med biennial herb Fl Jan-Dec Verbesina encelioides (Cav.) A.Gray crown beard Asteraceae Med Med notfound Med annual herb Fl Feb-Jul/Dec Vulpia bromoides (L.) Gray squirrel tail fescue Poaceae Med Med notfound Med annual grass Fl Sep-Dec Vulpia muralis (Kunth) Nees Poaceae Med Med Low Med annual grass Fl Aug-Dec Xanthium spinosum L. Bathurst burr Asteraceae Low notfound notfound High annual herb Fl Jan-Jun

Appendix table 2. Non-agricultural weeds of high and medium weed risk present within the NAR and buffer zones Common name Ag Range Species Family NAR Risk Lifecycle Reproduction (n = native) buffer buffer Acetosa vesicaria (L.) A.Love rosy dock Polygonaceae Med Med High High annual herb Fl Jul-Sep Alternanthera pungens Kunth khaki weed Amaranthaceae Med notfound notfound High annual/perennial herb Fl Dec-Jul, stolons Argemone ochroleuca Sweet Mexican poppy Papaveraceae Med notfound High High annual herb Fl Feb-Mar/Jul-Nov Asphodelus fistulosus L. onion weed Asphodelaceae Med Med Med High annual/biennial herb Fl Jun-Oct Avena barbata Link bearded oat Poaceae High High Low High annual grass Fl Aug-Dec Avena sativa L. common oat Poaceae Med Med notfound Medium annual grass Fl Oct Bidens bipinnata L. bipinnate beggartick Asteraceae Low notfound Low Medium annual herb Fl Mar-Sep Brassica tournefortii Gouan wild turnip Brassicaceae High High High High annual herb Fl Jun-Nov Briza maxima L. blowfly grass Poaceae High High notfound Medium annual grass Fl Sep-Oct Briza minor L. shivery grass Poaceae Med Med Med Medium annual grass Fl Sep-Oct Bromus catharticus Vahl prairie grass Poaceae Med Med notfound High annual/biennial grass Fl Sep-Jan Bromus diandrus Roth great brome Poaceae High High Low High annual grass Fl Aug-Nov Bromus hordeaceus L. soft brome Poaceae High Med notfound High annual grass Fl Aug-Nov 29 Bromus madritensis L. Madrid brome Poaceae High High notfound Medium annual grass Fl Sep-Nov

Bromus rubens L. red brome Poaceae High High Low High annual grass Fl Aug-Oct Carpobrotus edulis (L.) N.E.Br. hottentot fig Aizoaceae Med Med notfound Medium perennial herb Fl Jul-Oct Carrichtera annua (L.) DC. Ward’s weed Brassicaceae Med notfound notfound High annual herb Fl Sep-Nov Cenchrus ciliaris L. buffel grass Poaceae Med notfound Med Medium perennial grass Fl Feb-Oct Cenchrus longispinus (Hack.) Fernald spiny burrgrass Poaceae Low notfound notfound Medium perennial grass Cenchrus setiger Vahl birdwood grass Poaceae Med notfound Low Medium perennial grass Fl Apr-May Centaurium erythraea Rafn common centaury Gentianaceae Med Med notfound Medium annual/biennial herb Fl Oct-Apr Centaurium pulchellum (Sw.) Druce Gentianaceae Low Med notfound Medium annual herb Fl Oct-Nov Cerastium glomeratum Thuill. mouseear chickweed Caryophyllaceae High High Low Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Dec Chrysanthemum coronarium L. Asteraceae Med notfound notfound Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Nov Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist flaxleaf fleabane Asteraceae Med notfound Low High annual herb Fl Jan-Dec Crassula thunbergiana Schult. Crassulaceae Med notfound notfound High annual herb Fl Oct Ehrharta calycina Sm. perennial veld grass Poaceae High Med Low Medium perennial grass Fl Mar-Apr/Aug-Sep Ehrharta longiflora Sm. annual veld grass Poaceae High High Med Medium annual grass Fl Jul-Nov Emex spinosa (L.) Campd. lesser jack Polygonaceae Med notfound notfound Medium annual herb Fl Jul, Sep

Common name Ag Range Species Family NAR Risk Lifecycle Reproduction (n = native) buffer buffer Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees African lovegrass Poaceae High High notfound High perennial grass Fl Aug/Nov-May Erodium botrys (Cav.) Bertol. long storksbill Geraniaceae Med High notfound Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Nov Erodium cicutarium (L.) L’Her. common storksbill Geraniaceae High High High High annual/biennial herb Fl May-Oct Euphorbia terracina L. Geraldton carnation weed Euphorbiaceae Med Med notfound High perennial herb Fl Aug-Dec Ferraria crispa Burm. black flag Iridaceae Med notfound notfound Medium perennial herb Fl Jul-Nov, corms Fumaria capreolata L. whiteflower fumitory Fumariaceae Med Med notfound Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Nov Fumaria densiflora DC. denseflower fumitory Fumariaceae Med notfound notfound Medium annual herb Geranium dissectum L. Geraniaceae Low notfound notfound Medium annual herb Fl Oct-Nov Geranium molle L. dove’s foot cranesbill Geraniaceae Low Med notfound Medium annual/perennial herb Fl Oct-Nov Gladiolus caryophyllaceus (Burm.f.) Poir. wild gladiolus Iridaceae Med Med notfound Medium perennial herb, corms Fl Aug-Nov Heliotropium curassavicum L. smooth heliotrope (n) Boraginaceae Med notfound High Medium annual/perennial herb Fl May-Jan Hordeum glaucum Steud. Northern barley grass Poaceae Med High Low Medium annual grass Fl Jul-Nov Hypochaeris glabra L. smooth catsear Asteraceae High High High High annual/perennial herb Fl Jan-Dec Juncus acutus L. spiny rush Juncaceae Med Med notfound Medium perennial herb Fl Aug-Nov/May, rhizomes 30 Juncus capitatus Weigel capitate rush Juncaceae High Med notfound High annual herb Fl Sep-Dec

Lepidium africanum (Burm.f.) DC. rubble peppercress Brassicaceae Med Med notfound Medium annual/perennial herb Fl Apr/Sep/Dec Limonium sinuatum (L.) Mill. perennial sea lavender Plumbaginaceae Med Med notfound Medium perennial herb Fl Jan–May/Sep–Dec Lupinus albus L. volunteer lupin Fabaceae Med notfound notfound High annual herb Fl Aug-Oct Lupinus cosentinii Guss. blue lupin Fabaceae High Med Low High annual herb Fl Aug-Nov Lythrum hyssopifolia L. lesser loosestrife Lythraceae Med Med Low Medium annual herb Fl Sep-Jan Malva parviflora L. marshmallow Malvaceae High Med High High annual/perennial herb Fl Mar/Jul-Nov Medicago laciniata (L.) Mill. Fabaceae Med notfound notfound High annual herb Fl Aug-Oct Medicago polymorpha L. burr medic Fabaceae Med High High High annual herb Fl Jan-Feb/May-Nov Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. iceplant Aizoaceae Med High Med Medium annual/biennial herb Fl Sep-Dec Moraea flaccida (Sweet) Steud. cape tulip Iridaceae Med Med notfound High perennial herb Fl Sep-Nov, corms Nothoscordum gracile (Aiton) Stearn Alliaceae Med notfound notfound Medium perennial herb Fl Oct-Jan, bulbs Opuntia stricta Haw. common prickly pear Cactaceae Low notfound notfound Medium shrub Oxalis glabra Thunb. Oxalidaceae Med Med notfound Medium perennial herb Fl May-Aug, bulbs Oxalis pes-caprae L. soursob Oxalidaceae Med Med Med High perennial herb Fl Jun-Oct, , bulbs, rhizomes Oxalis purpurea L. largeflower wood sorrel Oxalidaceae Med Med notfound High perennial herb Fl May-Sep, bulbs

Common name Ag Range Species Family NAR Risk Lifecycle Reproduction (n = native) buffer buffer Papaver rhoeas L. field poppy Papaveraceae Low notfound notfound High annual herb Fl Sep-Oct Parkinsonia aculeata L. parkinsonia Fabaceae Low notfound notfound High tree/shrub Paspalum distichum L. water couch Poaceae Med notfound notfound Medium perennial grass Fl Dec-Apr Pelargonium capitatum (L.) L’Her. rose pelargonium Geraniaceae Low Med notfound Medium perennial herb Fl Feb-Apr/Aug-Dec Petrorhagia dubia velvet pink Caryophyllaceae High High Low Medium annual herb Fl Mar/Jul-Dec Phalaris canariensis L. canary grass Poaceae Med notfound notfound High annual grass Fl Sep-Oct Phalaris minor Retz. lesser canary grass Poaceae Med Med High High annual grass Fl Aug-Nov Polypogon monspeliensis (L.) Desf. annual barbgrass Poaceae Med High High Medium annual grass Fl May-Nov Prosopis pallida (Willd.) Kunth algaroba Fabaceae Low High notfound High tree/shrub Reseda luteola L. wild mingonette Resedaceae Med Med notfound Medium perennial herb Fl May/Nov-Jan Romulea rosea (L.) Eckl. Guildford grass Iridaceae Med High notfound High perennial herb Fl Aug-Nov, corms Rumex crispus L. curled dock Polygonaceae Med Med notfound High perennial herb Fl Jun-Dec Rumex obtusifolius L. broadleaf dock Polygonaceae Low notfound notfound High perennial herb Fl Dec-Apr Rumex pulcher L. fiddle dock Polygonaceae Low Med notfound High perennial herb Fl Sep-Dec 31 Setaria verticillata (L.) P.Beauv. whorled pigeon grass Poaceae Med notfound Low Medium annual grass Fl Dec-Jun

Silene gallica L. Caryophyllaceae High High Med Medium annual herb Fl Jul-Dec Solanum linnaeanum Hepper & P.- Solanaceae Low notfound notfound High shrub Fl Jan-May/Aug/Oct M.L.Jaeger Sonchus oleraceus L. sowthistle Asteraceae High High Med High annual herb Fl Jan-Dec Stellaria media (L.) Vill. chickweed Caryophyllaceae Med Med notfound High annual herb Fl Jun-Oct Tamarix aphylla (L.) H.Karst. apple pine Tamaricaceae Low notfound Low Medium tree Trachyandra divaricata (Jacq.) Kunth Asphodelaceae Med Med notfound Medium perennial herb Fl Aug-Nov Trifolium angustifolium L. narrowleaf clover Fabaceae Low Med notfound Medium annual herb Fl Sep-Jan Trifolium arvense L. hare foot clover Fabaceae High Med notfound Medium annual herb Fl Jun-Jan Trifolium campestre Schreb. hop clover Fabaceae Med Med notfound Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Jan Trifolium cernuum Brot. drooping flower clover Fabaceae Med Med notfound Medium annual herb Fl Sep-Dec Trifolium cherleri L. cupped clover Fabaceae Med Med notfound Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Nov Trifolium dubium Sibth. suckling clover Fabaceae Med Med notfound Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Dec Trifolium glomeratum L. cluster clover Fabaceae Med Med notfound Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Dec Trifolium hirtum All. rose clover Fabaceae Med Med notfound Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Mar Trifolium repens L. white clover Fabaceae Med Med notfound Medium annual herb Fl Jul-Nov

Common name Ag Range Species Family NAR Risk Lifecycle Reproduction (n = native) buffer buffer Trifolium striatum L. knotted clover Fabaceae Low notfound notfound Medium annual herb Fl Oct-Mar Trifolium subterraneum L. subterranean clover Fabaceae High High notfound Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Nov Trifolium tomentosum L. Fabaceae High High notfound Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Nov/Feb-Mar Ursinia anthemoides (L.) Poir. ursinia Asteraceae High High Low Medium annual herb Fl Jul-Dec Vellereophyton dealbatum (Thunb.) white cudweed Asteraceae High Med notfound Medium annual/perennial herb Fl Jan-Dec Hilliard & B.L.Burtt Vicia benghalensis L. purple vetch Fabaceae Med notfound notfound Medium annual/perennial herb Fl Apr/Aug-Nov Vulpia fasciculata (Forssk.) Samp. Poaceae Low notfound notfound Medium annual grass Fl Sep-Dec Vulpia myuros (L.) C.C.Gmel. rat’s tail fescue Poaceae High High Low High annual grass Fl Jul-Nov Wahlenbergia capensis (L.) A.DC. cape bluebell Campanulaceae High High notfound Medium annual herb Fl Sep-Nov Zaluzianskya divaricata (Thunb.) Walp. spreading night phlox Scrophulariaceae High High Low Medium annual herb Fl Aug-Oct 32

References

Aboling S, Sternberg M, Perevolotsky A & Kigel J 2008, ‘Effects of cattle grazing timing and intensity on soil seed banks and regeneration strategies in a Mediterranean grassland’, Community Ecology, vol. 9, pp. 97–106. Adams P, Nelson DE, Yamada S, Chmara W, Jensen RG, Bohnert HJ & Griffiths H 1998, ‘Growth and development of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum (Aizoaceae)’, New Phytologist, vol. 138, pp. 171–190. Al-Rumaih MM, Al Saad FA & Warsy AS 2003, ‘Floral initiation and development in Rumex vesicarius L.’, Journal of King Saud University Science, vol. 15, pp. 123–134. Andersen MC 1992, ‘An analysis of variability in seed settling velocities of several wind-dispersed Asteraceae’, American Journal of Botany, vol. 79, pp. 1087–1091. Anikster Y 1989, ‘Host specificity versus plurivority in barley leaf rusts and their microcyclic relatives’, Mycological Research, vol. 93, pp. 175–181. APVMA (Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority) 2009, ‘Public Chemical Registration Information System—PUBCRIS’, Australian Government, Canberra, http://services.apvma.gov.au/PubcrisWebClient/lookup.do (accessed 17 December 2009). Asrar AWA 2000, ‘Seed germination and seedling growth and development of hommaidh (Rumex vesicarius L.)’, Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 31, pp. 95–104. Auld MA & Medd RW 1987, Weeds—an illustrated botanical guide to the weeds of Australia, Inkata Press, Melbourne. Austin MP, Groves RH, Fresco LMF & Kaye PE 1985, ‘Relative growth of six thistle species along a nutrient gradient with multispecies competition’, Journal of Ecology, vol. 73, pp. 667–684. AVH (Australia’s Virtual Herbarium) 2009, www.chah.gov.au/avh (accessed 8 August 2009). Babar BH, Tanveer A, Tahir M, Aziz A, Ahmad A-UH, Nadeem MA & Javaid MM 2009, ‘Allelopathic potential of wild onion (Asphodelus tenuifolius) on the germination and seedling growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum)’, Weed Biology and Management, vol. 9, pp. 146–151. Bachelard HS & Trikojus VM 1963, ‘Studies in endemic goitre’, Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 16, pp. 147–165. Baker GH & Hawke BG 1990, ‘Life history and population dynamics of Theba pisana (Mollusca: Helicidae) in a cereal–pasture rotation’, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 27, pp. 16–29. Battisti DS & Naylor RL 2009, ‘Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat’, Science, vol. 323, pp. 240–244. Bebawi FF, Campbell SD & Stanley TD 2002, ‘Priority lists for weed research in the wet- and dry- tropics of north Queensland’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 17, pp. 67–73. Bee S, Martin L, Devenish K & Piper T 2002, ‘Allelopathic effects of crop, pasture and weed residues on subsequent crop and pasture establishment’, in Crop updates, Department of Agriculture, Perth, Western Australia, pp. 124–125. Bell DT 1993, ‘The effect of light quality on the germination of eight species from sandy habitats in Western Australia’, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 41, pp. 321–326. Bohnert HJ & Cushman JC 2000, ‘The ice plant cometh: lessons in abiotic stress tolerance’, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 19, pp. 334–346. Borger C 2008, ‘Matricaria’, in Peltzer S (ed.), E-weed, Department of Agriculture and Food, Perth, Western Australia, pp. 5–6. Borger J & Madin RW 1993, ‘Paddy and Afghan melons’, AgMemo 91/93. Botha CJ & Penrith ML 2008, ‘Poisonous plants of veterinary and human importance in southern ’, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 119, pp. 549–558. Botha FC & Grobbelaar N 1981, ‘Germination inhibitors in the fruits of some indigenous species of the Cucurbitaceae’, South African Journal of Science, vol. 77, pp. 79–81. Botha FC, Grobbelaar N & Small JGC 1982, ‘Seed germination in Citrullus lanatus. Part 1. Effect of white light and growth substances on germination’, South African Journal of Botany, vol. 1, pp. 10–13. Bourke CA 1984, ‘Staggers in sheep associated with the ingestion of Tribulus terrestris’, Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 61, pp. 360–363.

33

Bourke CA, Stevens GR & Carrigan MJ 1992, ‘Locomotor effects in sheep of alkaloids identified in Australian Tribulus terrestris’, Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 69, pp. 163–165. Boydston RA 1990, ‘Time of emergence and seed production of longspine sandbur (Cenchrus longispinus) and puncturevine (Tribulus terrestris)’, Weed Science, vol. 38, pp. 16–21. Browicz K, Zielinski J & Tan K 2001, ‘Rumex vesicarius (Polygonaceae) in the eastern Mediterranean region’, Polish Botanical Journal, vol. 46, pp. 71–73. Brown SM & Whitwell T 1988, ‘Influence of tillage on horseweed, Conyza canadensis’, Weed Technology, vol. 2, pp. 269–270. Burnett VF & Moore J 2006, ‘Wireweed’, in McGillion T & Storrie A, Integrated weed management in cropping systems—a training resource for farm advisors, CRC for Australian Weed Management, Adelaide, South Australia, pp. 208–210. Burnett VF, Young KR, McLaren D, Norng S, Norton R, Lemerle D & Cousens R 2008, ‘Competitive effects of wireweed (Polygonum aviculare L.) in field and glasshouse studies’, Proceedings of the 16th Australian Weeds Conference, Cairns Convention Centre, North Queensland, Australia, 18–22 May 2008, pp. 199–201. Burry JN & Kloot PM 1982, ‘The spread of composite (Compositae) weeds in Australia’, Contact Dermatitis, vol. 8, pp. 410–413. Burt RL 1968, ‘Growth and development of buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris)’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, vol. 8, pp. 712–719. Cavagnaro TR, Smith FA, Kolesik P, Ayling SM & Smith SE 2001, ‘Arbuscular mycorrhizas formed by Asphodelus fistulosus and Glomus coronatum: three-dimensional analysis of plant nuclear shift using laser scanning confocal microscopy’, Symbiosis, vol. 30, pp. 109–121. CBH (Co-operative Bulk Handling) 2009, 2009/10 Co-operative Bulk Handling (CBH) grain receival standards, CBH, Perth, Western Australia. Chaboudez P 1994, ‘Patterns of clonal variation in skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea), an apomictic species’, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 42, pp. 283–295. CHAH (The Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria) 2009, ‘Solanum hoplopetalum’, Australia’s Virtual Herbarium, http://avh.dec.wa.gov.au (accessed 8 December 2009). Charles GW 1991, ‘A grower survey of weeds and herbicide use in the New South Wales cotton industry’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, vol. 31, pp. 387–392. Chauhan BS, Gill G & Preston C 2006a, ‘Factors affecting turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum) seed germination in southern Australia’, Weed Science, vol. 54, pp. 1032–1036. Chauhan BS, Gill G & Preston C 2006b, ‘Seedling recruitment pattern and depth of recruitment of 10 weed species in minimum tillage and no-till seeding systems’, Weed Science, vol. 54, pp. 658–668. Cheam AH 1984, ‘Allelopathy in buffel (Cenchrus ciliaris L.)’, Australian Weeds, vol. 3, pp. 133–136. Cheam AH, Storrie A, Koetz EA, Holding DJ, Bowcher AJ & Barker JA 2008, Managing wild radish and other brassicaceous weeds in Australian cropping systems, CRC for Australian Weed Management, Adelaide. Cocks PS 1994, ‘Colonization of a South Australian grassland by invading Mediterranean annual and perennial pasture species’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 45, pp. 1063–1076. Conn JS, Beattie KL & Blanchard A 2006, ‘Seed viability and dormancy of 17 weed species after 19.7 years of burial in Alaska’, Weed Science, vol. 54, pp. 464–470. Cooke J 2003, ‘Ecology of Carrichtera annua (L.) DC. in semi-arid Australia’, honours thesis, School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT. Cooke J, Ash J & Groves R 2004, ‘The ecology of Ward’s weed (Carrichtera annua): a weed of the southern rangelands of Australia’, Ecological Society of Australia Annual Conference, University of Adelaide, 7–10 December 2004. Costea M & Tardif FJ 2005, ‘The biology of Canadian weeds. 131. Polygonum aviculare L.’ Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 85, pp. 481–506. Cousens RD & Pheloung P 1996, ‘What limits geographic distributions of cruciferous weeds in Australia?’, Proceedings of the 2nd International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, 25–28 June 1996: volumes 1–4, pp. 55–59. Cousens R, Armas G & Baweja R 1994, ‘Germination of Rapistrum rugosum (L) All from New South Wales, Australia’ Weed Research, vol. 34, pp. 127–135.

34

Cousens R, Baweja R, Vaths J & Schofield M 1993, ‘Comparative biology of cruciferous weeds: a preliminary study’, Proceedings I of the 10th Australian Weeds Conference and 14th Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 6–10 September, 1993, pp. 376–380. Coutts BA, Hawkes JR & Jones RAC 2006, ‘Occurrence of Beet western yellow virus and its aphid vectors in over-summering broad-leafed weeds and volunteer crop plants in the grainbelt region of south-western Australia’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 57, pp. 975–982. CRC for Weed Management 2008, ‘Buffel grass’ (Cenchrus ciliaris), Weed management guide, CRC for Weed Management. CSIRO 2009, OzCLIM, www.csiro.au/ozclim (accessed 6 August 2009). Culvenor CCJ, Jago MV, Peterson JE, Smith LW, Payne AL, Campbell DG, Edgar JA & Frahn JL 1984, ‘Toxicity of Echium plantagineum Patersons curse 1. Marginal toxic effects in merino wethers from long-term feeding’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 35, pp. 293–304. Cunningham GM, Mulham WE, Milthorpe PL & Leigh JH 1992, Plants of western New South Wales, NSW Government Printing Office, Sydney. Cuthbertson EG 1965, ‘Vernalization and flowering in skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea)’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, vol. 5, pp. 329–332. Cuthbertson EG 1972, ‘Chondrilla juncea in Australia: Part 4 Root morphology and regeneration from root fragments’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, vol. 12, pp. 528–534. DAFWA (Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia) 2007, Onion weed (Asphodelus fistulosus), DAFWA, Perth, http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/PC_93103.html (accessed 12 November 2009). DAFWA (Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia) 2008, List of declared plants: Agriculture and Related Resources Protection Act 1976, DAFWA, Perth. Dauer JT, Mortensen DA & Humston R 2006, ‘Controlled experiments to predict horseweed (Conyza canadensis) dispersal distances’, Weed Science, vol. 54, pp. 484–489. Davidson S 1990, ‘Goats help eliminate thistles’, Rural Research, vol. 147, pp. 16–19. DCLM (Department of Conservation and Land Management) 1999, Karijini National Park Management Plan 1999–2009, DCLM for the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority, Perth, Western Australia. Dean WRJ, Milton SJ & Siegfried WR 1990, ‘Dispersal of seeds as nest material by birds in semiarid karoo shrubland’, Ecology, vol. 71, pp. 1299–1306. DEC (Department of Environment and Conservation) 2007, NatureMap: mapping Western Australia’s biodiversity, DEC, http://naturemap.dec.wa.gov.au/. Delfosse ES 1990, ‘Biological control of weeds and the dried fruits industry’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 5, pp. 91–97. Delfosse ES & Cullen JM 1980, ‘New activities in biological control of weeds in Australia I. Common heliotrope Heliotropium europaeum’, 5th International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, Brisbane, Australia. Dellow JJ & Seaman JT 1985, ‘Distribution of Echium plantagineum L. and its association with pyrrolizidine alkaloid poisoning in horses in New South Wales’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 1, pp. 79–83. Dellow JJ & Seaman JT 1987, ‘Current status and distribution of common heliotrope (Heliotropium europaeum L.) in New South Wales’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 2, pp. 165–167. Dellow JJ, Storrie A, Cheam AH, King WM, Jacobs S & Kemp DR 2006, ‘Major brassicaceous weeds in Australian agriculture’, Proceedings of the Wild Radish and other Cruciferous Weeds Symposium, South Perth, Western Australia, pp. 1–10. Dodd J 1984, ‘Biology of the Western Australian weed Afghan thistle (Solanum hoplopetalum)’, Proceedings of the 7th Australian Weeds Conference, vol. 1, pp. 169–172. Dodd J 1990, ‘ (Oncosiphon) spp. in Western Australia: history, distribution and significance’, Proceedings of the 9th Australian Weeds Conference, Adelaide, South Australia, p. 451. Dodd J & Panetta FD 1987, ‘Seed production by skeleton weed Chondrilla juncea L. in Western Australia in relation to summer drought’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 38, pp. 689–706. Duffield GA & Bull CM 1998, ‘Seasonal and ontogenetic changes in the diet of the Australian skink Egernia stokesii’, Herpetologica, vol. 54, pp. 414–419. El-Ghareeb R 1991a, ‘Vegetation and soil changes induced by Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L in a Mediterranean desert ecosystem’, Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 20, pp. 321–330.

35

El-Ghareeb RM 1991b, ‘Suppression of annuals by Tribulus terrestris in an abandoned field in the sandy desert of Kuwait’, Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 2, pp. 147–154. Enyedy K 2006, Annual bastard-cabbage, Plant Conservation Alliance, Alien Plant Working Group, http://www.nps.gov/plants/ALIEN/fact/raru1.htm. Esquivel JF 2008, ‘Observations and implications of the cotton fleahopper (Heteroptera: Miridae) in Rapistrum rugosum (Capparales: Brassicaceae)’, Journal of Entomological Science, vol. 43, pp. 434–437. Esquivel JF & Mowery SV 2007, ‘Host plants of the tarnished plant bug (Heteroptera: Miridae) in Central Texas’, Environmental Entomology, vol. 36, pp. 725–730. Evans G 1971, ‘Influence of weed hosts on the ecology of Verticillium dahliae in newly cultivated areas of the Namoi Valley, New South Wales’, Annals of Applied Biology, vol. 67, pp. 169–175. Everett J 1992, ‘Conyza’, in Harden G (ed.), Flora of New South Wales, New South Wales University Press, Sydney, pp. 197–200. Everist SL 1974, Poisonous plants of Australia, Angus & Robinson, Sydney. Facelli JM & Chesson P 2008, ‘Cyclic dormancy, temperature and water availability control germination of Carrichtera annua, an invasive species in chenopod shrublands’, Austral Ecology, vol. 33, pp. 324–328. Facelli JM, Chesson P & Barnes N 2005, ‘Differences in seed biology of annual plants in arid lands: a key ingredient of the storage effect’, Ecology, vol. 86, pp. 2998–3006. Farley GJ 2007, ‘Germination and dormancy of Australian native grass species used for minesite rehabilitation’, PhD thesis, School of Land, Crop and Food Sciences, University of Queensland. Forcella F & Wood H 1986, ‘Sequential flowering of thistles (Cynareae, Asteraceae) in southern Australia’, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 34, pp. 455–461. Forcella F, Wood JT & Dillon SP 1986, ‘Characteristics distinguishing invasive weeds within Echium’, Weed Research, vol. 26, pp. 351–364. Foulds W 1993, ‘Nutrient concentrations of foliage and soil in south-western Australia’, New Phytologist, vol. 125, pp. 529–546. Friedel M, Puckey H, O’Malley C, Waycott M, Smyth A & Miller G 2006, Buffel grass: both friend and foe. An evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of buffel grass use, and recommendations for future research, Desert Knowledge CRC, Alice Springs. Fromm GM 1990, ‘Chemical control of saffron thistle (Carthamus lanatus L.) in pasture in the South Australian mallee’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 5, pp. 14–17. Fromm GM & Grieger VL 2002, ‘The effect of summer weed management on subsequent grain yield and quality’, 13th Australian Weeds Conference: weeds ‘threats now and forever?’, Sheraton Perth Hotel, Perth, Western Australia, 8–13 September 2002: papers and proceedings, pp. 63–66. Froud-Williams RJ, Drennan DSH & Chancellor RJ 1983, ‘Influence of cultivation regime on weed floras of arable cropping systems’, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 20, pp. 187–197. Gardner CA & Bennetts HW 1956, The toxic plants of Western Australia, West Australian Newspapers, Periodicals Division, Perth. Garthwaite AJ, Steudle E & Colmer TD 2006, ‘Water uptake by roots of Hordeum marinum: formation of a barrier to radial O2 loss does not affect root hydraulic conductivity’, Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 57, pp. 655–664. Gat-Tilman G 1995, ‘The accelerated germination of Carrichtera annua seeds and the simulating and inhibiting effects produced by the mucilage at supra-optimal temperatures’, Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 30, pp. 327–338. Ghosheh H & Al-Hajaj N 2005, ‘Weed seedbank response to tillage and crop rotation in a semi-arid environment’, Soil & Tillage Research, vol. 84, pp. 184–191. Gibson N, Keighery GJ, Lyons MN & Webb A 2004, ‘Terrestrial flora and vegetation of the Western Australian wheatbelt’, in Keighery G, Halse S, Harvey M & McKenzie N (eds), A biodiversity survey of the Western Australian agriculture zone: Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement 67, Western Australian Museum, Perth, pp. 139–202. Glastonbury JRW, Doughty FR, Whitaker SJ & Sergeant E 1984, ‘A syndrome of hepatogenous photosensitization, resembling geeldikkop, in sheep grazing Tribulus terrestris’, Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 61, pp. 314–316.

36

Goss WL 1931, ‘Viability of seed as shown by laboratory tests in soil’, California State Department Agricultural Monthly Bulletin, vol. 20, pp. 319–321. Goss WL 1939, ‘Germination of buried weed seeds’, California State Department Agricultural Monthly Bulletin, vol. 28, pp. 132–135. Grace B, Sindel BM, Sheppard AW & Whalley RDB 1999, ‘Ecology and management of saffron thistle (Carthamus lanatus L.) in New South Wales pastures’, 12th Australian Weeds Conference, 12–16 September 1999, Hobart, Tasmania, pp. 13–15. Grace BS, Whalley RDB, Sheppard AW & Sindel BM 2002, ‘Managing saffron thistle in pastures with strategic grazing’, Rangeland Journal, vol. 24, pp. 313–325. Grace BS, Sheppard AW, Whalley RDBW & Sindel BM 2004, ‘Recent news about saffron thistle (Carthamus lanatus L.)’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 19, pp. 36–39. Groves RH & Kaye PE 1989, ‘Germination and phenology of seven introduced thistle species in southern Australia’, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 37, pp. 351–359. Groves RH & Whalley RDB 2002, ‘Grass and grassland ecology in Australia’, in Flora of Australia. Poaceae 1. Introduction and atlas, Bureau of Flora and Fauna, Canberra. Groves RH & Williams JD 1975, ‘Growth of skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea L) as affected by growth of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L) and infection by Puccinia chondrillina Bubak and Syd’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 26, pp. 975–983. Groves RH, Hosking JR, Batianoff GN, Cooke DA, Cowie ID, Johnson RW, Keighery GJ, Lepschi BJ, Mitchell AA, Moerkerk MR, Randall RP, Rozefelds AC, Walsh NG & Waterhouse BM 2003, Weed categories for natural and agricultural ecosystem management, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. Grunzweig JM & Korner C 2003, ‘Differential phosphorus and nitrogen effects drive species and community responses to elevated CO2 in semi-arid grassland’, Functional Ecology, vol. 17, pp. 766–777. Gu HN 2009, ‘Cold tolerance and overwintering of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in southeastern Australia’, Environmental Entomology, vol. 38, pp. 524–529. Gutterman Y 1994, ‘Strategies of seed dispersal and germination in plants inhabiting deserts’, The Botanical Review, vol. 60, pp. 373–425. Hall TJ 2001, ‘History and development of buffel grass pasture lands in Queensland’, Buffel Grass Symposium: Proceedings of a workshop held at Theodore on 12–23 February 2000, Brisbane, pp. 2–12. Halvorson WL & Guertin P 2003, ‘Factsheet for Hordeum L. spp.’, in USGS Weeds in the West Project: status of introduced plants in southern Arizona Parks, US Geological Survey and Southwest Biological Science Centre, Tucson, Arizona, http://sdrsnet.srnr.arizona.edu/data/sdrs/ww/docs/hord_spp.pdf (accessed 7 December 2009). Harris MR & Facelli JM 2003, ‘Competition and resource availability in an annual plant community dominated by an invasive species, Carrichtera annua (L. Aschers.), in South Australia’, Plant Ecology, vol. 167, pp. 19– 29. Hartley MJ & Bimler KH 1975, ‘Barley grass damage to lambs’, Proceedings of the 28th New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference, pp. 2–6. Hasan S & Aracil E 1991, ‘Biology and effectiveness of Uromyce heliotropii, a potential biological control agent of Heliotropium europaeum L.’, New Phytologist, vol. 118, pp. 559–563. Hawkes JR & Jones RAC 2005, ‘Incidence and distribution of barley yellow dwarf virus and cereal yellow dwarf virus in over-summering grasses in a Mediterranean-type environment’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 56, pp. 257–270. Heap I 2009, The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds, www.weedscience.org (accessed 19 October 2009). Hill BD, Gaul KL & Noble JW 1997, ‘Poisoning of feedlot cattle by seeds of Heliotropium europaeum’, Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 75, pp. 360–361. Hill RD 1984, ‘Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in seedling crops of perennial ryegrass and tall fescue’, Proceedings of the 7th Australian Weeds Conference, 17–21 August, Perth, Western Australia, vol. 1, pp. 332– 334. Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV & Herberger JP 1977, The world’s worst weeds: distribution and biology, University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. Hoopes MF & Hall LM 2002, ‘Edaphic factors and competition affect pattern formation and invasion in a California grassland’, Ecological Applications, vol. 12, pp. 24–39.

37

Hope PK, Drosdowsky W & Nicholls N 2006, ‘Shifts in the synoptic systems influencing southwest Western Australia’, Climate Dynamics, vol. 26, pp. 751–764. Howell JM, Deol HS & Dorling PR 1991, ‘Experimental copper and Heliotropium europaeum intoxication in sheep—clinical syndromes and trace element concentrations’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 42, pp. 979–992. Humphries SE, Mitchell DS & Groves RH 1991, Plant invasions of Australian ecosystems: a status review and management directions, CSIRO, Canberra. Hunt J, Cousens R & Knights S 2004, ‘The ecology of common heliotrope in a Mediterranean dryland cropping system’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 19, pp. 126. Hunt JR, Cousens RD & Knights SE 2006, ‘The germination ecology of common heliotrope (Heliotropium europaeum L.)’, 15th Australian Weeds Conference, Managing weeds in a changing climate, Adelaide, South Australia, 24–28 September 2006, pp. 126–129. Hunt J, Cousens R & Knights S 2008, ‘The biology of Australian weeds. 51. Heliotropium europaeum L.’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 23, pp. 146–152. Hunt JR, Cousens RD & Knights SE 2009, ‘Heliotropium europaeum only germinates following sufficient rainfall to allow reproduction’, Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 73, pp. 602–610. Hussey BMJ, Keighery GJ, Dodd J, Lloyd SG & Cousens RD 2007, Western weeds: a guide to the weeds of Western Australia, The Weeds Society of Western Australia Inc., Perth. Huwer RK, Briese DT, Dowling PM, Kemp DR, Lonsdale WM, Michalk DL, Neave MJ, Sheppard AW & Woodburn TL 2005, ‘Can an integrated management approach provide a basis for long-term prevention of weed dominance in Australian pasture systems?’, Weed Research, vol. 45, pp. 175–192. Huxtable CHA & Whalley RDB 1999, ‘Emergence and survival of three native grass species sown on roadsides on the Northern Tablelands, New South Wales, Australia’, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 47, pp. 221–235. IOCI (Indian Ocean Climate Initiative) 2002, Climate variability and change in south west Western Australia, IOCI, Perth. Jackson J 2005, ‘Is there a relationship between herbaceous species richness and buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris)?’, Austral Ecology, vol. 30, pp. 505–517. Jacob RH & Peet RL 1987, ‘Poisoning of sheep and goats by Tribulus terrestris (caltrop)’, Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 64, pp. 288–289. Jacob RH & Peet RL 1989, ‘Acute oxalate toxicity of sheep associated with slender iceplant (Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum)’, Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 66, pp. 91–92. Johnson DH & Talbert RE 1993, ‘Imazethapyr and imazaquin control puncturevine (Tribulus terrestris) but carry over to spinach (Spinacia oleracea)’, Weed Technology, vol. 7, pp. 79–83. Johnson E 1932, ‘The puncture vine in California’, University of California College Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin, pp. 528. Johnstone RB 1990, ‘Control of Emex, Tribulus and Cenchrus in vineyards’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 5, pp. 84. Jurado E, Westoby M & Nelson D 1991, ‘Diaspore weight, dispersal, growth form and perenniality of central Australian plants’, Journal of Ecology, vol. 79, pp. 811–828. Kawasaki S, Miyake C, Kohchi T, Fujii S, Uchida M & Yokota A 2000, ‘Responses of wild watermelon to drought stress: accumulation of an ArgE homologue and citrulline in leaves during water deficits’, Plant & Cell Physiology, vol. 41, pp. 864–873. Kempen HM & Graf J 1981, ‘Weed seed production’, Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science, vol. 34, pp. 78–81. Khan AH & Qaiser M 2006, ‘Halophytes of Pakistan: characteristics, distribution and potential economic usages’, in Khan M, Kust G, Barth H & Boer B (eds), Sabka ecosystems, Springer, Netherlands, pp. 129–153. Kinter CL, Mealor BA, Shaw NL & Hild AL 2007, ‘Postfire invasion potential of rush skeletonweed (Chondrilla juncea)’, Rangeland Ecology & Management, vol. 60, pp. 386–394. Kloot PM 1983, ‘The role of common iceplant (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum) in the deterioration of medic pastures’, Australian Journal of Ecology, vol. 8, pp. 301–306. Kloot PM & Boyce KG 1982, ‘Allelopathic effects of wire weed (Polygonum aviculare)’, Australian Weeds, vol. 1, pp. 11–14. Lamp C & Collet F 1984, A field guide to weeds in Australia, Inkata Press, Melbourne.

38

Lanigan GW, Payne AL & Peterson JE 1978, ‘Anti-methanogenic drugs and Heliotropium europaeum poisoning in penned sheep’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 29, pp. 1281–1292. Lapidge SJ 2000, ‘Dietary adaptation of reintroduced yellow-footed rock-wallabies, Petrogale xanthopus xanthopus (Marsupialia: Macropodidae), in the northern Flinders Ranges, South Australia’, Wildlife Research, vol. 27, pp. 195–201. Lawson BE, Bryant MJ & Franks AJ 2004, ‘Assessing the potential distribution of buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) in Australia using a climate–soil model’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 19, pp. 155–163. Lazarides M 2002, ‘Economic attributes of Australian grasses’, in Flora of Australia. Poaceae 1. Introduction and atlas, Bureau of Flora and Fauna, Canberra. Lewis T, Clarke PJ, Whalley RDB & Reid N 2009, ‘What drives plant biodiversity in the clay floodplain grasslands of NSW?’, The Rangeland Journal, vol. 31, pp. 329–351. Leys AR, Amor RL, Barnett AG & Plater B 1990, ‘Evaluation of herbicides for control of summer-growing weeds on fallows in south-eastern Australia’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, vol. 30, pp. 271–279. Lodge GM 1979, ‘Effect of fertility level on the yield of some native perennial grasses on the North-West Slopes, New South Wales’, Australian Rangeland Journal, vol. 1, pp. 327–333. Lodge GM & Whalley RDB 1981, ‘Establishment of warm- and cool-season native perennial grasses on the north-west slopes of New South Wales. I. Dormancy and germination’, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 29, pp. 111–119. Lodge GM & Whalley RDB 1983, ‘Seasonal variations in herbage mass, crude protein and in-vitro digestibility of native perennial grasses on the north-west slopes of New South Wales’, Australian Rangeland Journal, vol. 5, pp. 20–27. Lyons MN, Gibson N, Keighery GJ & Lyons SD 2004, ‘Wetland flora and vegetation of the Western Australian wheatbelt’, in Keighery G, Halse S, Harvey M & McKenzie N (eds), A biodiversity survey of the Western Australian agriculture zone, Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement 67, Western Australian Museum, Perth. McBarron EJ 1976, Medical and veterinary aspects of plant poisons in New South Wales, New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Sydney. McDonald G, New TR & Farrow RA 1995, ‘Geographical and temporal distribution of the common armyworm, Mythimna convecta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in Eastern Australia: larval habitats and outbreaks’, Australian Journal of Zoology, vol. 43, pp. 601–629. McGillion T & Storrie A (eds) 2006, Integrated weed management in cropping systems: a training resource for farm advisors, CRC for Australian Weed Management, Adelaide, South Australia. McIntyre RE 2009, ‘Soil biogeochemistry and flooding in intermittent streams of the semi-arid Pilbara region’, PhD thesis, University of Western Australia, Perth. McIvor JG 2003, ‘Competition affects survival and growth of buffel grass seedlings—is buffel grass a coloniser or invader?’, Tropical Grasslands, vol. 37, pp. 176–181. McKenzie RA, Newman RD, Rayner AC & Dunster PJ 1988, ‘Prickly paddy melon (Cucumis myriocarpus) poisoning of cattle’, Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 65, pp. 167–170. McKeown NR & McCulloch RN 1962, ‘The effect of burning and cultivating residual wheat stubble on the yield of oats and associated plants’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, vol. 2, pp. 197–203. McVean DN 1966, ‘Ecology of Chondrilla juncea L. in south-eastern Australia’, Journal of Ecology, vol. 54, pp. 345–365. Mahmood A & Athar M 2006, ‘Scanning electron microscopic observations on micro-organisms in the root nodules of Tribulus terrestris L. (Zygophyllaceae)’, Scanning, vol. 28, pp. 233–235. Maia JGS & da Silva MHL, Zoghbi MDB, Andrade EHA 2002, ‘Composition of the essential oils of Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist’, Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 14, pp. 325–326. Malo JE & Suarez F 1995, ‘Herbivorous mammals as seed dispersers in a Mediterranean dehesa’, Oecologia, vol. 104, pp. 246–255. Marchant NG, Wheeler JR, Rye BL, Bennett EM, Lander NS & Macfarlane TD 1987, Flora of the Perth region, Part 2, Western Australian Herbarium, Perth.

39

Martin RJ & McMillan MG 1984, ‘Some results of a weed survey in northern New South Wales’, Australian Weeds, vol. 3, pp. 115–116. Mauchline AL, Watson SJ, Brown VK & Froud-Williams RJ 2005, ‘Post-dispersal seed predation of non-target weeds in arable crops’, Weed Research, vol. 45, pp. 157–164. Maze KM & Goodridge MR 1991, ‘The effect of four broadleaf herbicides on seedlings of five native and one introduced grass species’, Rangeland Journal, vol. 13, pp. 91–95. Maze KM, Koen TB & Watt LA 1993, ‘Factors influencing the germination of six perennial grasses of central New South Wales’, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 41, pp. 79–90. Meadley GRW 1965, ‘Afghan thistle (Solanum hystrix R. Br.)’, in Weeds of Western Australia, Department of Agriculture Western Australia, Perth, pp. 130–131. Meadly GRW 1957, ‘Weeds of Western Australia: saffron thistle (Carthamus lanatus (Tourn.) L.)’, Journal of the Department of Agriculture for Western Australia, vol. 6, pp. 197–201. Medd R & Wilson BJ 1984, ‘Towards managing weed populations in winter cereals’, Proceedings of the 7th Australian Weeds Conference, Perth, Western Australia, 17–21 August, 1984, vol. 1, pp. 164–168. Michael PW 1994, ‘Alien plants’, in Groves RH (ed.), Australian vegetation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57–83. Michael PJ, Owen MJ & Powles SB 2010, ‘Herbicide resistant weed seeds contaminate grain sown in the Western Australian grainbelt’, Weed Science, vol. 58, pp. 466–472. Michael PJ, McLeod B, Borger C & Douglas A 2008, ‘A survey of summer weed incidence and distribution across the WA wheatbelt’, Agribusiness Crop Updates 2008, Perth, Western Australia, pp. 72–73. Milne M & Walter GH 1998, ‘Host species and plant part specificity of the polyphagous onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), in an Australian cotton-growing area’, Australian Journal of Entomology, vol. 37, pp. 115–119. Mishra JS, Singh VP & Yaduraju NT 2006, ‘Wild onion (Asphodelus tenuifolius Cav.) interference in lentil and chickpea crops and its management through competitive cropping’, Weed Biology & Management, vol. 6, pp. 151–156. Mishra JS, Swain D & Singh VP 2001, ‘Allelopathic effect of Asphodulus tenuifolius on wheat, mustard, lentil and chickpea’, Pestology, vol. 25, pp. 48–50. Molfino RH 1947, ‘Argentine plants which produce changes in the characters and properties of milk and its derivatives’, Comunicacion del Instituto Agrario Argentino [Argentinian Agrarian Institute Report], vol. 7, pp. 23–34. Morrison SM & Scott JK 1993, ‘Assessment of the origins of Tribulus terrestris in Australia’, Proceedings I of the 10th Australian Weeds Conference and 14th Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 6–10 September 1993, pp. 388–391. Neave MJ & Huwer RK 2003, ‘Post-dispersal seed predation of three major pasture weeds in southern Australia’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 102–106. Nicholls AO, Williams JD & Moore RM 1987, ‘Competition between Chondrilla juncea and Trifolium subterraneum: the influence of canopy areas and heights’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 38, pp. 329–338. Nurdin, Fulbright TE 1990, ‘Germination of two legumes in leachate from introduced grasses’, Journal of Range Management, vol. 43, pp. 466–467. Orchard HE 1946, ‘Weeds which taint food’, Journal of the Department of Agriculture South Australia, vol. 50, pp. 173–180. Osten V, Hashem A, Koetz E, Lemerle D, Pathan S & Wright G 2006, ‘Impacts of summer fallow weeds on soil nitrogen and wheat in the southern, western and northern Australian grain regions’, 15th Australian Weeds Conference, Adelaide, South Australia, pp. 395–398. Owen MJ, Owen RK & Powles SB 2009, ‘A survey in the southern grain belt of Western Australia did not find Conyza spp. resistant to glyphosate’, Weed Technology, vol. 23, pp. 492–494. Paczkowska G 1993a, ‘Cenchrus ciliaris L.’, FloraBase, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia, http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au, accessed 19 November 2009. Paczkowska G 1993b, ‘Chloris truncata R.Br.’, FloraBase, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia, http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au (accessed 24 November 2009).

40

Paczkowska G 1995, ‘Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L.’, FloraBase, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia, http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au (accessed 3 December 2009. Paczkowska G 1996, ‘Solanum hoplopetalum Bitter & Summerh.’, FloraBase, Department of Environment and Conservation, http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au (accessed 10 November 2009). Panetta FD & Dodd J 1995, ‘Chondrilla juncea L.’, in Groves R, Shepherd R & Richardson R (eds), The biology of Australian weeds, vol. 1, RG and FJ Richardson, Frankston, Victoria, pp. 67–86. Parsons WT & Cuthbertson EG 2001, Noxious weeds of Australia, 2nd edition, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. Patterson DT 1996, ‘Temperature and photoperiod effects on onionweed (Asphodelus fistulosus) and its potential range in the United States’, Weed Technology, vol. 10, pp. 684–688. Peirce JR 1990, ‘Morphological and phenological variation in three populations of saffron thistle Carthamus lanatus L. from Western Australia’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 41, pp. 1193–1202. Peirce JR 1995, ‘Carthamus lanatus L.’, in Groves R, Shepherd R & Richardson R (eds), The biology of Australian weeds, vol. 1, RG and FJ Richardson, Frankston, Victoria, pp. 51–66. Peirce J, Reeves A & Rayner B 2008, Saffron thistle and its control, Farmnote 326, Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth. Peltzer S 2008, ‘Windmill grass—a native grass, a pasture plant or a weed?’, in E-weed, Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth, pp. 4–5. Peterson JE & Jago MV 1984, ‘Toxicity of Echium plantagineum Patersons curse 2. Pyrrolizidine alkaloid poisoning in rats’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 35, pp. 305–316. Piggin CM 1976, ‘Factors affecting seed germination of Echium plantagineum L and Trifolium subterraneum L.’, Weed Research, vol. 16, pp. 337–344. Piggin CM 1977, ‘Nutritive value of Echium plantagineum L and Trifolium subterraneum L’, Weed Research, vol. 17, pp. 361–365. Piggin CM 1978a, ‘Dispersal of Echium plantagineum L by sheep’, Weed Research, vol. 18, pp. 155–160. Piggin CM 1978b, ‘Flowering and seed production of Echium plantagineum L’, Weed Research, vol. 18, pp. 83– 87. Piggin CM & Sheppard AW 1995, ‘Echium plantagineum’, in Groves R, Shepherd R & Richardson R (eds), The biology of Australian weeds, RG and FJ Richardson, Frankston, Victoria, pp. 87–110. Pitt J 2004, ‘Current distribution and strategic management options for buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) in South Australia’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 19, pp. 73–74. Pitt JL, Virtue JG & Feuerherdt LJ 2006, ‘Onion weed: pest or perception?’, 15th Australian Weeds Conference, Papers and Proceedings, Adelaide, South Australia, 24–28 September 2006: Managing weeds in a changing climate, pp. 454–457. Planfarm Pty Ltd 2009, Herbicide guide 2009, Planfarm Pty Ltd, Perth, Western Australia. Popay AI 1981, ‘Germination of seeds of 5 annual species of barley grass’, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 18, pp. 547–558. Preston C 2006, ‘Resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in Echium plantagineum L’, 15th Australian Weeds Conference, Papers and Proceedings, Adelaide, South Australia, 24–28 September 2006: Managing weeds in a changing climate, pp. 530–533. Prieur-Richard A-H, Lavorel S, Grigulis K & Dos Santos A 2000, ‘Plant community diversity and invasibility by exotics: invasion of Mediterranean old fields by Conyza bonariensis and Conyza canadensis’, Ecology Letters, vol. 3, pp. 412–422. Procopio SO, Ferreira EA, Silva EAM, Silva AA, Rufino RJN & Santos JB 2003, ‘Leaf anatomical studies in weed species widely common in Brazil. III—Galinsoga parviflora, Crotalaria incana, Conyza bonariensis and Ipomoea cairica’, Planta Daninha, vol. 21, pp. 1–9. Puckey H & Albrecht D 2004, ‘Buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.): presenting the arid Northern Territory experience to our South Australian neighbours’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 19, pp. 69–72. Quinlivan BJ & Peirce JR 1968, ‘The long-term field germination of saffron thistle (Carthamus lanatus) and life span of dormant seeds in the Geraldton region, WA’, Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, vol. 34, pp. 231–232. Quinn LD, Kolipinski M, Coelho VR, Davis B, Vianney JM, Batjargal O, Alas M & Ghosh S 2008, ‘Germination of invasive plant seeds after digestion by horses in California’, Natural Areas Journal, vol. 28, pp. 356–362.

41

Ramachar P & Rao AS 1984, ‘Uromyces longipedicellaris: new species on Rumex vesicarius, Kavaka, vol. 12, pp. 71–72. Randall RP 2007, The introduced flora of Australia and its weed status, CRC for Weed Management, Glen Osmond, South Australia. Roark B 1955, ‘The autecology of Asphodelus fistulosus L’, PhD thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide.

Rudmann SG, Milham PJ & Conroy JP 2001, ‘Influence of high CO2 partial pressure on nitrogen use efficiency of the C4 grasses Panicum coloratum and Cenchrus ciliaris’, Annals of Botany, vol. 88, pp. 571–577. Sankhla N & Ziegler H 1975, ‘Eco-physiological studies on Indian arid zone plants. V. A screening of some species for the C4 pathway of photosynthetic CO2 fixation’, Oecologia 21, pp. 123–129. Saqib M, Jones MGK & Jones RAC 2006, ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma australiense is associated with diseases of red clover and paddy melon in south-west Australia’, Australasian Plant Pathology, vol. 35, pp. 283–285. Schatral A & Osborne JM 2006, ‘Germination and dormancy states of seeds in the environmental weed Rumex vesicarius (Polygonaceae). I. Seed polymorphism and germination of extracted seeds’, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 54, pp. 773–782. Schatral A, Short N, Osborne JM, Andreoli E & Hansen M 2008, ‘Studies on the soil seed bank of the environmental weed Rumex vesicarius (Fam.: Polygonaceae) at a rehabilitated mine site in semi-arid Western Australia’, Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 72, pp. 2075–2081. Scott JK 1990, ‘Tribulus terrestris L. Zygophyllaceae in southern Africa: an outline of biological and potential biological control agents for Australia’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 5, pp. 103–106. Scott JK & Morrison SM 1996, ‘Variation in populations of Tribulus terrestris (Zygophyllaceae). 1. Burr morphology’, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 44, pp. 175–190. Shepherd RCH 1990, ‘Past Victorian work on Emex australis Stenheil and Tribulus terrestris L’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 5, pp. 100–102. Sheppard A & Smyth M 2002, ‘Predicting seedbank decay rates: the effects of field conditions on seed longevity and seedling recruitment in Echium plantagineum L’, 13th Australian Weeds Conference: weeds ‘threats now and forever?’, 8–13 September 2002, Perth, Western Australia, pp. 541–544. Sheppard AW, Brun LA & Lewis RC 1996a, ‘A demographic comparison of common heliotrope, Heliotropium europaeum L.: Southern Australia and Southern France’, in Proceedings of the 11th Australian Weeds Conference, 30 September – 3 October 1996, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 286–290. Sheppard AW, Brun LA & Lewis RC 1996b, ‘A demographic comparison of common heliotrope, Heliotropium europaeum L.: Southern Australia and Southern France. Proceedings of the 11th Australian Weeds Conference, 30 September – 3 October 1996, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 286–290. Sheppard AW, Smyth MJ & Swirepik A 2001, ‘The impact of a root-crown weevil and pasture competition on the winter annual Echium plantagineum’, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 38, pp. 291–300. Simmons MT 2005, ‘Bullying the bullies: the selective control of an exotic, invasive annual (Rapistrum rugosum) by oversowing with a competitive native species (Gaillardia pulchella)’, Restoration Ecology, vol. 13, pp. 609–615. Sindel BM 1991, ‘A review of the ecology and control of thistles in Australia’, Weed Research, vol. 31, pp. 189– 201. Sinden J, Jones R, Hester S, Odom D, Kalisch C, James R & Cacho O 2004, ‘The economic impact of weeds in Australia’, technical series no. 8, CRC for Australian Weed Management. Smyth A, Friedel M & O’Malley C 2009, ‘The influence of buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) on biodiversity in an arid Australian landscape’, Rangeland Journal, vol. 31, pp. 307–320. Smyth MJ, Sheppard AW & Swirepik A 1997, ‘The effect of grazing on seed production in Echium plantagineum’, Weed Research, vol. 37, pp. 63–70. Somervaille A 2004, ‘Control of flax-leaf fleabane with fallow herbicides near Jondaryan’, Fleabane: Proceedings of a workshop held at DPI&F in Toowoomba, Australia, 25th February 2004, p. 28. Spooner A 1999, ‘Heliotropium europaeum L.’, FloraBase, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia, http://florabase.dec.wa.gov.au (accessed 17 November 2009). Spooner A 2000, ‘Carthamus lanatus L.’, FloraBase, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia, http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au (accessed 17 November 2009). Spooner A 2004a, ‘Oncosiphon piluliferum (L.f.) Kallersjo’, FloraBase, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia, http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au (accessed 2 December 2009).

42

Spooner A 2004b, ‘Oncosiphon suffruticosum (L.f.) Kallersjo’, FloraBase, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia, http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au (accessed 2 December 2009). Spooner A 2007, ‘Polygonum aviculare L.’, FloraBase, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia, http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au (accessed 8 December 2009). Spooner A, Carpenter J, Smith G & Spence K 2009, ‘Acetosa vesicaria (L.) A. Love’, FloraBase, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia, http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au (accessed 11 November 2009). Squires VR 1965, ‘A note on Aristotelia sp. (Lep., Gelechiidae) attacking Tribulus terrestris L’, Entomological Society of Australia, vol. 2, pp. 43–44. Squires VR 1968, Autoecological studies on Tribulus terrestris L. (Zygophyllaceae), University of New England. Squires VR 1979, ‘Biology of Australian weeds. 1. Tribulus terrestris L’, Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, vol. 45, pp. 75–82. St John-Sweeting RS & Morris KA 1990, ‘Seed transmission through the digestive tract of the horse’, Proceedings of the 9th Australian Weeds Conference, pp. 137–139. Stephenson DW 1987, ‘Biology of Calomba daisy, Pentzia suffruticosa’, Proceedings of the 8th Australian Weeds Conference, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 21–25 September 1987, pp. 156–158. Stevens OA 1932, ‘The number and weight of seeds produced by weeds’, American Journal of Botany, vol. 19, pp. 784–794. Stewart V 2002a, ‘Herbicide options for melon control’, Crop updates, Department of Agriculture, Perth, Western Australia, pp. 119–121. Stewart V 2002b, ‘Herbicide options for the control of Chloris truncata (windmill grass)’, Crop updates, Department of Agriculture, Perth, Western Australia, pp. 122–123. Stewart V 2002c, ‘Herbicide options for the control of Chloris truncata (windmill grass)’, Crop updates, Department of Agriculture, Perth, Western Australia, pp. 122–123. Stocks DC, Dunster PJ & Gibson JA 1984, ‘Observations of the effects of Rapistrum rugosum on thyroid function’, Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 61, pp. 264–265. Stokes CJ & Howden SM (eds) 2008, An overview of climate change adaptation in Australian primary industries—impacts, options and priorities, prepared for Land & Water Australia by the CSIRO Climate Adaptation National Research Flagship, CSIRO, Canberra. Storrie A 2006, ‘Turnip weed’, in McGillion T & Storrie A (eds), Integrated weed management in Australian cropping systems: a training resource for farm advisors, CRC for Australian Weed Management, Adelaide, South Australia, pp. 196–198. Storrie A, Moylan P & Cook T 2006, ‘Seed set control of charlock and turnip weed in chickpeas’, Proceedings of the wild radish and other cruciferous weeds symposium, South Perth, Western Australia, pp. 57–65. Stovold G 1973, ‘Phytophthora drechsleri Tucker and Pythium spp. as pathogens of safflower in New South Wales’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, vol. 13, pp. 455–459. Swirepik A & Smyth M 2002, ‘Biological control of broad-leafed pasture weeds (Paterson’s curse, Onopordum and nodding thistles). What have we achieved and where to from here?’, 13th Australian Weeds Conference: weeds ‘threats now and forever?’, Sheraton Perth Hotel, Perth, Western Australia, 8–13 September 2002: papers and proceedings, pp. 373–376. Syme H, Acuna TLB, Abrecht D & Wade LJ 2007, ‘Nitrogen contributions in a windmill grass (Chloris truncata)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system in south-western Australia’, Australian Journal of Soil Research, vol. 45, pp. 635–642. Symon DE 1986, ‘A survey of Solanum prickles and marsupial herbivory in Australia’, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, vol. 73, pp. 745–754. Thebaud C & Abbott RJ 1995, ‘Characterization of invasive Conyza species (Asteraceae) in Europe: quantitative trait and isozyme analysis’, American Journal of Botany, vol. 82, pp. 360–368. Thomas M 2004, ‘Perennial grasses—potential grazing problems’, Farmnote 29/2004, Department of Agriculture and Food, Perth, Western Australia. Thorn S 2004, ‘Fleabane—implications for current farming systems in Goondiwindi region’, Fleabane: Proceedings of a workshop held at DPI&F in Toowoomba, Australia, 25 February 2004, pp. 25–26. Thorp JR & Lynch R 2000, The determination of weeds of national significance, National Weeds Strategy Executive Committee, Launceston.

43

Tripathi RS 1968a, ‘Certain autoecological observations on Asphodelus tenuifolius: a troublesome weed of Indian agriculture’, Tropical Ecology, vol. 9, pp. 208–219. Tripathi RS 1968b, ‘Comparison of competitive ability of certain common weed species: Anagallis arvensis, Asphodelus tenuifolius and Euphorbia dracunculoides’, Tropical Ecology, vol. 9, pp. 37–41. van der Vossen HAM, Denton OA & El Tahir IM 2004, ‘Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai’, in Grubben G & Denton O (eds), PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa / Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale), PROTA, Wageningen, Netherlands, http://database.prota.org/search.htm (accessed 17 November 2009). Van Ommen TD & Morgan V 2010, ‘Snowfall increase in coastal East Antarctica linked with southwest Western Australian drought’, Nature Geoscience, published online 7 February 2010. Verdu AMC & Mas MT 2006, ‘Cohort-dependent seedling recruitment, survival and reproductive capacity of Tribulus terrestris’, Weed Research, vol. 46, pp. 371–378. Virtue J 2008, South Australian weed risk management guide, February 2008, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, Adelaide, http://www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au/assets/files/SA_Weed_Risk_Management_Guide.pdf. Virtue J, Cunningham D, Hanson C, Hosking J, Miller I, Panetta D, Pheloung P, Randall RP, Timmins S, Walton C, Weiss J & Williams P 2006, National Post-Border Weed Risk Management Protocol, Standards Australia, Standards New Zealand and the CRC for Australian Weed Management. Vivrette NJ & Muller CH 1977, ‘Mechanism of invasion and dominance of coastal grassland by Mesembryanthemum crystallinum’, Ecological Monographs, vol. 47, pp. 301–318. Von Bothmer R, Flink J, Jacobsen N & Jorgensen RB 1989, ‘Variation and differentiation in Hordeum marinum (Poaceae)’, Nordic Journal of Botany, vol. 9, pp. 1–10. Walker SR 2006, ‘Suppression of turnip weed with crop competition’, Proceedings of the Wild Radish and other Cruciferous Weeds Symposium, South Perth, Western Australia, pp. 111–112. Walker S, Werth J & Widderick M 2007, ‘Management of flaxleaf fleabane’, Fleabane: Proceedings of a workshop held at DPI&F, 7th February 2007, Toowoomba, Qld. Walker S, Osten V, Storrie A, Robinson G, Cook T & Galea K 2002, ‘Weeds at risk of developing herbicide resistance in the different cropping systems of the northern region’, 13th Australian Weeds Conference: weeds ‘threats now and forever?’, Sheraton Perth Hotel, Perth, Western Australia, 8–13 September 2002: papers and proceedings, pp. 620–621. Walker S, Wilson B, Wu H, Widderick M & Taylor I 2006, ‘Weed seed persistence with changing farming practices in southern Queensland’, 15th Australian Weeds Conference, Papers and Proceedings, Adelaide, South Australia, 24–28 September 2006: Managing weeds in a changing climate, pp. 343–346. Weaver SE 2001, ‘The biology of Canadian weeds: Conyza canadensis’, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 81, pp. 867–875. Weber E 2003, Invasive plant species of the world: a reference guide to environmental weeds, CABI Publishing, Wallingford. Wells GJ 1969, ‘Skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea) in the Victorian mallee: 1 Competition with legumes’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, vol. 9, pp. 521–527. Wells GJ 1970, ‘Skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea) in the Victorian mallee: 2 Effect of legumes on soil fertility, subsequent wheat crop and weed population’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, vol. 10, pp. 622–629. Wells GJ 1971, ‘Ecology and control of skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea) in Australia’, Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, vol. 37, pp. 122–125. Wells MJ, Balsinhas AA, Joffe H, Engelbrecht VM, Harding G & Stirton CH 1986, ‘A catalogue of problem plants in Southern Africa’, in Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa, Botanical Research Institute, South Africa, no. 53, p. 405. Werth J & Walker S 2007, ‘Tillage effect on fleabane emergence’, Fleabane: Proceedings of a workshop held at DPI&F in Toowoomba, Australia, 25 February 2004, pp. 22–23. Western Australian Herbarium 2009, FloraBase, Department of Environment and Conservation, Perth, http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au. Whish JPM, Sindel BM, Jessop RS & Felton WL 2002, ‘The effect of row spacing and weed density on yield loss of chickpea’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 53, pp. 1335–1340.

44

Whittet JN 1968, Weeds, Government Printing, Sydney. Widderick M & Wu H 2007, ‘Weed 10. Fleabane’, in Integrated weed management in Australian cropping systems: a training resource for farm advisors, CRC for Australian Weed Management, pp. 178–182 Wilson BJ 1981, ‘Effect of time of seedling emergence on seed production and time to flowering of eight weeds’, Proceedings of the 6th Australian Weeds Conference, City of Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 13–18 September 1981, vol. 1, pp. 35–38. Wilson BJ & Duff AA 1984, ‘Dynamics of weed seedling emergence in wheat growing soils’, Proceedings of the 7th Australian Weeds Conference, Perth, Western Australia, 17–21 August 1984, vol. 1, pp. 162–163. Winkworth RE 1971, ‘Longevity of buffel grass seed sown in an arid Australian range’, Journal of Range Management, vol. 24, pp. 141–145. Winter K & Ziegler H 1992, ‘Induction of crassulacean acid metabolism in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum increases reproductive success under conditions of drought and salinity stress’, Oecologia, vol. 92, pp. 475– 479. Wu H 2007, ‘The biology of Australian weeds. 49. Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 22, pp. 122–131. Wu H & Walker S 2004, ‘Fleabane biology and control’, Fleabane: Proceedings of a workshop held at DPI&F in Toowoomba, Australia, 25 February 2004, pp. 5–6. Wu H, Walker S & Robinson G 2008, ‘Chemical control of flaxleaf fleabane (Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist) in winter fallows’, Plant Protection Quarterly, vol. 23, pp. 162–165. Wu H, Walker S, Taylor I & Robinson G 2006, ‘Biology and management of flaxleaf fleabane (Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist)’, 15th Australian Weeds Conference, Papers and Proceedings, Adelaide, South Australia, 24–28 September 2006: Managing weeds in a changing climate, pp. 137–140. Wu H, Walker S, Rollin MJ, Tan DKY, Robinson G & Werth J 2007, ‘Germination, persistence, and emergence of flaxleaf fleabane (Conyza bonariensis [L.] Cronquist)’, Weed Biology and Management, vol. 7, pp. 192– 199. Yadav RP, Shrivastava UK & Dwivedi SC 1999, ‘Comparative efficiency of herbicides in controlling Asphodelus tenuifolius and other weeds in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)’, Indian Journal of Agronomy, vol. 44, pp. 151–155.

45 11-059 Covers.indd 3 25/10/2011 2:44:38 PM 11-059 Covers.indd 3 25/10/2011 2:44:38 PM Climate Change Impacts on Agricultural Weeds in Western Australia by Pippa J Michael, Paul B Yeoh, Noboru Ota and John K Scott

This project focuses on the weed risk in relation to climate change in that both extends on the research undertaken in Phase 1 and moves into the Northern Agricultural Region (NAR) of Western Australia. The new areas. These reports will be published in the second half of 2012. region was chosen because it is predicted to experience considerable This report is an addition to RIRDC’s diverse range of over 2200 research environmental impact from climate change. It is also one of Australia’s publications which can be viewed and freely downloaded from our highly productive agricultural regions, generating approximately $1 website www.rirdc.gov.au. Information on the Weeds Program is available billion annually.This project was funded in Phase 1 of the National online at www.rirdc.gov.au/weeds Weeds and Productivity Research Program, which was managed by the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Most of RIRDC’s publications are available for viewing, free Forestry (DAFF) from 2008 to 2010. The Rural Industries Research and downloading or purchasing online at www.rirdc.gov.au. Purchases can Development Corporation (RIRDC) is now publishing the final reports also be made by phoning 1300 634 313. of these projects. Phase 2 of the Program, which is funded to 30 June 2012 by the Australian Government, is being managed by RIRDC with the goal of reducing the impact of invasive weeds on farm and forestry productivity as well as on biodiversity. RIRDC is commissioning some 50 projects

This publication can be viewed at our website—www.rirdc.gov.au. Contact RIRDC: Ph: 02 6271 4100 All RIRDC books can be purchased from: Level 2, 15 National Circuit Fax: 02 6271 4199 Barton ACT 2600 Email: [email protected] web: www.rirdc.gov.au www.rirdc.gov.au PO Box 4776 Kingston ACT 2604

www.rirdc.gov.au

11-059 Covers.indd 4 25/10/2011 2:44:38 PM