DOCSLIB.ORG

From the Editors' Desks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

August 2012; 38(3) 57 European Science Editing Publications Committee From the Editors’ Desks Chief editor Armen Yuri Gasparyan The eleventh Annual General Meeting report that for the first time in several [email protected] was held in Tallinn: the President’s years we made a small surplus in 2011. Production editor full report is on the website. Several This was mainly due to rigorous cost Lynne Rowland [email protected] members of Council stepped down and control. Our membership, which is our Secretary we appreciate all their contributions main source of income, fell from 538 Mary Hodgson to EASE. So, my thanks to my two at the end of 2010 to 462 at the end of [email protected] Vice-Presidents, Alison Clayson, who 2011, but seems to have stabilized. If has done an excellent job coordinating you enjoy being a member of EASE, as European Science Editing Membership recruitment and retention, we hope you do, please spread the word Articles and correspondence and Reme Melero, who has organized to colleagues and help to make us an Armen Yuri Gasparyan many successful seminars and will even better organization. [email protected] continue to do so. I am also grateful It was a pleasure to announce the Book reviews to Petter Oscarsson for his work on award of an Honorary Life Fellowship Moira Johnson [email protected] the Handbook, Edward Towpik for to Elisabeth Heseltine for her services to EASE-Forum digest hosting courses in Warsaw and, of EASE and the scientific community in Elise Langdon-Neuner course, Mare-Anne Laane for facilitating teaching science writing (see p70). [email protected] such a fantastic Conference at Tallinn We also announced the launch of This site I like University of Technology. Regional Chapters of EASE to facilitate Silvia Maina [email protected] For the new Council, the Vice- interaction among editors within News notes Presidents, Ana Marušić and Eva countries or groups of countries. There John Hilton Baranyiová, were elected unopposed, is more information on the website [email protected] as were the five Ordinary Members of and anyone interested in establishing a Editor’s bookshelf Council: Paola DeCastro, Shirin Heidari, Regional chapter should contact Ana Anna Maria Rossi [email protected] Izet Masic, Chris Sterken and Sylwia Marušić or Eva Baranyiová. Production assistance Ufnalska. I was re-elected as President, Finally, EASE has now launched a Penny Hubbard which means that Arjan Polderman freely available online Author Toolkit [email protected] continues as Past-President. I am very and my thanks to Tom Babor and pleased that Rod Hunt will continue as Kerstin Stenius for driving this. The first Science Editors’ Handbook Treasurer (this is not an elected post) elements are on the website and more Pippa Smart and am looking forward to working will be added. [email protected] with this team for the next three years. Some good news was the Treasurer’s Joan Marsh Website Silvia Maina EASE Council 2012-2015 [email protected] President: Joan Marsh, UK; [email protected] EASE Council Vice-Presidents: Ana Marušić, Croatia; Eva Baranyiová, Czech Republic Joan Marsh (ex officio) Members: Paola DeCastro, Italy; Shirin Heidari, Switzerland; Izet Masic, Bosnia & Herzegovina; Chris Sterken, Belgium; Sylwia Ufnalska, Poland; Contributions should be sent to the Armen Yuri Gasparyan, UK (ex officio) Chief Editor or the appropriate section Past-President: Arjan K S Polderman, The Netherlands editor. See the Instructions to Authors on EASE’s website (www.ease.org.uk). Treasurer and Company Secretary: Roderick Hunt, UK The journal is published in February, Secretary: Mary Hodgson; West Trethellan, Trethellan Water, Lanner, Redruth, May, August and November, free to Cornwall, TR16 6BP; +44 (0)1209 860450; [email protected] paid-up members of EASE and available on annual subscription of £65 to libraries European Science Editing is indexed/listed in SCOPUS, SCImago Journal and Country and other non-members. Rank (SJR), SCIRUS, CAB International, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory, NewJour, Genamics Disclaimer: The views expressed JournalSeek, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Electronic Journals Library (EZB), J-Gate, by contributors are their own. The ZETOC, The British Library, The Library of Congress, Cornell University Library, The John Association does not necessarily Rylands Library of the University of Manchester, Geneva Foundation for Medical Education endorse the claims of advertisers. and Research (GFMER), Academic Index,VINITI of RAS, GeoRef, Google, Index Copernicus Journals Master List, NLM Catalog, NLM LocatorPlus, EBSCO, ProQuest: LISA, HINARI, WorldCat, and RIN ISSN 0258-3127 Printed by Qwerty Ltd, The Markham To advertise in this journal, or on the EASE website, please contact EASE Centre, Theale RG7 4PE ©EASE 2012 Secretary, Mary Hodgson, [email protected] European Science Editing 58 August 2012; 38(3) August 2012; 38(3) 59 European Science Editing multi-authored articles of all types. In fact, recent evidence References Editorial from pharmacy and pharmacotherapy, a rapidly developing 1 EASE Guidelines for Authors and Translators of Scientific Articles to and influential field of science, indicates that the prevalence be Published in English. Available at http://www.ease.org.uk/sites/ Authorship and contributorship in scholarly journals of honorary authorship is 14.3%, reaching 29.4% with default/files/ease_guidelines-june2011c.pdf [accessed 2 June 2012]. articles authored by five or more individuals.8 2 Habibzadeh F, Marcovitch H. Authorship dispute among the League of Currently science editing is a discipline which covers each author should take responsibility for a specific part of Awarding undue credits to those who attain (honorary) Extraordinary Gentlemen. European Science Editing 2012;38(2):40–41. various issues in science writing, ethical editing, peer review, the work and, at the same time, should be familiar with authorship by merely holding a senior research post and 3 Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L. When authorship fails: a proposal publishing and scientometrics. Authorship in scholarly the whole paper.5 Collective responsibility may prevent obliging subordinates to put their names in potentially to make contributors accountable. JAMA 1997;278:579–585. doi: journals, and its abuses, is one of the key topics in this instances of research misconduct, such as plagiarism, early citable papers drives a circle of misconduct. Honorary 10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041 discipline and shapes its core values. The basic principles of in the process of research and writing. authors benefit from the paper by artificially boosting their 4 Smith R. Authorship is dying: long live contributorship. BMJ authorship underlie the foundations of research, academic Despite the undisputed advantages of the alternative scientometric profile, obtaining new funds and perpetuating 1997;315(7110):696. promotion and advancement in science. It’s hardly possible model, some principal issues with authorship remain the vicious circle. 5 Wager E, Kleinert S on behalf of COPE Council. Cooperation between to create knowledge and scientific products without unresolved. First of all, the extent of minimal and Is there a way out of the current situation? Authorship research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance following fair authorship criteria. substantive contributions warranting credits remains poorly issues may find a solution if all individuals and professional from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). March 2012. Though a universally acceptable definition of authorship distinguished. How do you credit those who do not meet bodies involved in scientific publishing stick to the rules Available at http://publicationethics.org/files/Research_institutions_ does not exist, there are two main components of any criteria of authors and substantive contributors but help of honest and transparent research reporting. Research guidelines_final.pdf [accessed 2 June 2012]. definition which have gained wide recognition – credit produce a good quality article? Originators of research institutions should accept policies encouraging fair 6 Smith R. Let’s simply scrap authorship and move to contributorship. and responsibility. Journal publications are the end result ideas give a start to the process of research. Laboratory authorship. Authors should avoid misconduct by BMJ 2012;344:e157. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e157 of creative work of individuals, or increasingly multi- technicians perform laboratory tests and supply a wealth of familiarising themselves with the accepted rules and 7 Bornmann L, Marx W. The h index as a research performance indicator. expert research teams, who are aiming to gain credit from essential raw data for original research papers, despite the by adhering to their institutions’ strategies. Editors and European Science Editing 2011;37(3):77–80. the scientific community and to contribute to knowledge lack of theoretical knowledge and capacity to interpret the reviewers are in a position to spot instances of inappropriate 8 Dotson B, Slaughter RL. Prevalence of articles with honorary and ghost creation. Traditional authorship models, largely based on data. Skilled statisticians merely analyse the raw data but authorship in journal submissions and suggest corrections. authors in three pharmacy journals. American Journal of Health- the criteria of the International Committee of Medical transform elementary facts into statistically significant
Recommended publications
  • The Unofficial Guide for Authors

    The Unofficial Guide for Authors

    Tomislav Hengl • Michael Gould • Wouter Gerritsma The Unofficial Guide for Authors From Research Design to Publication August 19, 2011 www.Lulu.com Wageningen Arnhem Legal Notice: The information presented herein is for informative purposes only and not to receive any com- mercial benefits. Under no circumstances shall the authors of this Guide be liable for any loss, damage, liability or expense incurred or suffered which is claimed to resulted from use of this Guide, including without limita- tion, any fault, error, omission, interruption or delay with respect thereto (reliance at User’s own risk). This is a self-published document that presents opinions of the authors only and not of the associated organizations and/or user communities. Neither Wageningen University nor any person acting on behalf of Wageningen University is responsible for the use which may be made of this publication. This is the second, extended edition of the EUR 22191 EN (ISBN: 92-79-01703-9) Scientific and Technical Research series report published by the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxem- bourg. This book will be periodically updated. To obtain the most recent version please visit: http://stores.lulu.com/t_hengl Contact Addresses: Tomislav Hengl, ISRIC — World Soil Information, P.O. Box 353, 6700 AJ Wageningen Tel.: +31-(0)317-484199 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.isric.org Michael Gould Associates BV, Apeldoornseweg 21 Tel.: +31-(0)26 3516750 E-mail: [email protected] Wouter Gerritsma, Wageningen UR Library Tel.: +31-(0)317 483052 E-mail: [email protected] http://library.wur.nl Josip Vranjkovic,´ Zagreb, Croatia E-mail: [email protected] http://zanimacije.net This document was prepared using LATEX software.
  • Correspondence Handicapped Research Institutions Winning the Global Research Competition: a Focus on Croatia

    Correspondence Handicapped Research Institutions Winning the Global Research Competition: a Focus on Croatia

    May 2014; 40(2) 53 European Science Editing Correspondence Handicapped research institutions winning the global research competition: A focus on Croatia We recently introduced a web application linked to spatial in their home country are highlighted. As a good example, visualization approaches and published academic ranking Figure 1 depicts some research institutions from Croatia lists (eg the Academic Ranking of World Universities that are included in the excellence mapping of medicine. The [ARWU]).1 This application maps and ranks academic country ranking is corrected for the Corruption Perception and research institutions by a statistical method which Index (CPI) which is set to a global mean. Controlling for integrates factors influencing research performance – Best the CPI results in a meaningful increase in the performance Paper and Best Journal Rates (see www.excellencemapping. of Croatian academic and research institutions; suggesting net). The best paper rate is the proportion of papers that that corruption handicaps scientific research. In fact, the belongs to 10% of the world’s most cited papers, while the University of Zagreb improves its ranking by 228 positions best journal rate is the proportion of papers published in after correcting for the CPI, or by excluding the potential 25% of the world’s most influential journals. influence of corruption. This university is viewed as a One of the potential confounders of research strong and winning global competition institution, with the performance is the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). adjusted Best Paper Rate reaching 13.2%, or approximately Countries with high GDP are generally better represented 3% greater than the expected Best Paper Rate.
  • Research Integrity Corner

    Research Integrity Corner

    Research integrity corner What’s in a name, anyway? Farrokh Habibzadeh* Past President of the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) Editor and Founder of the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (IJOEM) *Corresponding author: [email protected] Key words: authorship; journal software system; editorial policy Received: May 1, 2016 Accepted: May 2, 2016 In prehistoric matrifocal societies, children were thor. However, some records belonging to other identified by their mothers, not their fathers. This researchers, for similarity of authors’ names are re- did not last long and the era of patriarchy began. trieved and factitiously may be counted for the au- Thereafter, people were recognized by their fa- thor under question. In some countries, some thers. This shift in genealogy has clearly been re- names are very prevalent and finding two or more flected in Greek mythology – the defeat of the people with similar names is not uncommon. Find- goddess Gaia and Titans by Zeus and Olympian ing out what record really belongs to “who” some- gods. times is very difficult and time-consuming (1). Dif- We have used names, particularly surnames, to ferent spelling of names makes the situation even identify people who are related. However, this has worse – some records may not be retrieved at all been done in various ways in different societies. by a simple search. While in many western countries we use a given Several proposals to solve this “authority control” (first) name and a surname (family name) to iden- issue have so far been proposed. In 2009, we pro- tify a person, in Arab countries, there are in fact no posed a unique identifier, the so-called “AID”, to be surnames; people use their given name followed assigned to researchers (1).
  • Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: a Review of Approaches and Experiences David J

    Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: a Review of Approaches and Experiences David J

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2016 Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: A Review of Approaches and Experiences David J. Solomon Michigan State University Mikael Laakso Hanken School of Economics Bo-Christer Björk Hanken School of Economics Peter Suber editor Harvard University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Solomon, David J.; Laakso, Mikael; Björk, Bo-Christer; and Suber, Peter editor, "Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: A Review of Approaches and Experiences" (2016). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 27. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/27 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: A Review of Approaches and Experiences By David J. Solomon, Mikael Laakso, and Bo-Christer Björk With interpolated comments from the public and a panel of experts Edited by Peter Suber Published by the Harvard Library August 2016 This entire report, including the main text by David Solomon, Bo-Christer Björk, and Mikael Laakso, the preface by Peter Suber, and the comments by multiple authors is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 1 Preface Subscription journals have been converting or “flipping” to open access (OA) for about as long as OA has been an option.
  • PREVALENCE of POTENTIALLY PREDATORY PUBLISHING in SCOPUS on the COUNTRY LEVEL 1 Prevalence of Potentially Predatory Publishing in Scopus on the Country Level

    PREVALENCE of POTENTIALLY PREDATORY PUBLISHING in SCOPUS on the COUNTRY LEVEL 1 Prevalence of Potentially Predatory Publishing in Scopus on the Country Level

    PREVALENCE OF POTENTIALLY PREDATORY PUBLISHING IN SCOPUS ON THE COUNTRY LEVEL 1 Prevalence of Potentially Predatory Publishing in Scopus on the Country Level Tatiana Savinay∗ Ivan Sterligovy y National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia ∗Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Moscow, Russia. [email protected] [email protected] F Abstract—We present results of a large-scale study of po- of various degree of competence as well as by tentially predatory journals (PPJ) represented in the Scopus researchers themselves [Leydesdorff et al., 2016]. database, which is widely used for research evaluation. Both In short, research evaluation has become substan- journal metrics and country/disciplinary data have been evalu- tially more formalized relying on various indicators, ated for different groups of PPJ: those listed by Jeffrey Beall which are mostly based on publication and citation and those discontinued by Scopus because of “publication con- counts. This metrics explosion is partially attributed cerns”. Our results show that even after years of discontinuing, hundreds of active potentially predatory journals are still highly to the priorities of many nations and organizations visible in the Scopus database. PPJ papers are continuously to reproduce the success of world leaders in science produced by all major countries, but with different prevalence. and technology. Most ASJC (All Science Journal Classification) subject areas In this paper, we provide a bird’s eye view of the are affected. The largest number of PPJ papers are in engineer- growth of articles in potentially predatory journals ing and medicine. On average, PPJ have much lower citation (PPJ), a global phenomenon stemming from both metrics than other Scopus-indexed journals.
  • Research Integrity Corner: Special Issue on Predatory Journals Review

    Research Integrity Corner: Special Issue on Predatory Journals Review

    Research integrity corner: Special issue on predatory journals Review Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals Lorraine E. Ferris*1, Margaret A Winker2 1Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 2Secretary, World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Predatory journals, or journals that charge an article processing charge (APC) to authors, yet do not have the hallmarks of legitimate scholarly jour- nals such as peer review and editing, Editorial Boards, editorial offices, and other editorial standards, pose a number of new ethical issues in journal publishing. This paper discusses ethical issues around predatory journals and publishing in them. These issues include misrepresentation; lack of editorial and publishing standards and practices; academic deception; research and funding wasted; lack of archived content; and undermining confidence in research literature. It is important that the scholarly community, including authors, institutions, editors, and publishers, support the legitimate scholarly research enterprise, and avoid supporting predatory journals by not publishing in them, serving as their editors or on the Edito- rial Boards, or permitting faculty to knowingly publish in them without consequences. Key words: predatory journals; publication ethics; medical publishing Received: March 12, 2017 Accepted: May 11, 2017 Introduction Predatory journals, or journals that charge an arti- nals (3), making ways to identify them increasingly cle processing charge (APC) to authors, yet do not important. Several authors have suggested useful have the hallmarks of legitimate scholarly journals approaches and authors should apply such sug- such as peer review and editing, Editorial Boards, gestions before submitting their work to a journal editorial offices, and other editorial standards, that may be predatory (4-8).
  • Avoiding Predatory Journals and Publishers: a Cross-Sectional Study

    Avoiding Predatory Journals and Publishers: a Cross-Sectional Study

    Kinde AA. Avoiding predatory journals and publishers: a cross-sectional study. European Science Editing 2021;47. DOI: 10.3897/ese.2021.e54523 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Avoiding predatory journals and publishers: a cross-sectional study Alehegn Adane Kinde Department of Information Science, Faculty of Informatics, Lecturer, Director, Library and Documentation Services, University of Gondar, Ethiopia; [email protected]; ORCID 0000-0001-6839-5019 DOI: 10.3897/ese.2021.e52348 Abstract Background: Predatory journals (PJs) are journals that receive and publish articles through unethical publishing practices. Due to the boom of PJs, researchers face a wide range of journals from which to choose. Non-peer reviewed and low-quality articles can ruin the trustworthiness of science and have a damaging impact on decision-makers. Objective: To assess the level of awareness among Ethiopian researchers of PJs and to improve the awareness level through training. Method: The participants were professors, associate professors, assistant professors, and lecturers from different disciplines. The study included 18 statements for participants to indicate their level of awareness on the Likert scale, questions on knowledge resources on PJs, and open-ended questions about ways of avoiding PJs. A one-day programme trained the participants in detecting and avoiding PJs. Results: 43 participants completed the pre-assessment online survey and 37 participants completed the post-assessment survey. Many researchers were unaware of PJs and found it somewhat difficult to differentiate PJs from legitimate journals. However, during the post-assessment, the awareness level improved and the participants’ rating of the task of differentiating PJs from legitimate journals changed from ‘Somewhat difficult’ to ‘Easy’.
  • Editing a Scientific Journal in Croatia: the Case of Biochemia Medica

    Editing a Scientific Journal in Croatia: the Case of Biochemia Medica

    European Science Editing 69 August 2012; 38(3) Editing a scientific journal in Croatia: the case of Biochemia Medica Ana-Maria Simundic Editor in chief, Biochemia Medica; Clinical Institute of Chemistry, University Hospital Center “SESTRE MILOSRDNICE”, Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] Seven years ago, I attract great authors and encourages them to submit their joined the editorial work to Biochemia Medica. We frequently invite presenters at board of Biochemia relevant conferences, PhD students, residents and Croatian Medica, the English- scientists abroad to contribute to the journal. To assist our language, peer- authors, we published a series of articles on biostatistics reviewed journal of and research methodology.3 Moreover, we established the Croatian Society of constructive, comprehensive and author-supportive peer Medical Biochemists review to further increase the quality of the journal. (CSMB). Its 16th anniversary coincided Quality of the editorial work with a major re-design1 Biochemia Medica is an open-access journal. All articles when two co-editors in are freely available in HTML and PDF format. A signed chief were appointed, authorship statement and a copyright transfer form are and I was offered a post required for any submission. The authors are responsible of an assistant editor. for research integrity and ethical authorship. They should Our editorial policy was to gain international recognition ensure that all contributors listed as authors made a in the field of laboratory medicine. For a journal from a small significant contribution to the work. scientific community, this recognition could be earned by All submissions to the journal are handled by the editor adhering to internationally acceptable publishing standards in chief and assistant editors.
  • The Unofficial Guide for Authors

    The Unofficial Guide for Authors

    Tomislav Hengl • Michael Gould • Wouter Gerritsma The Unofficial Guide for Authors From Research Design to Publication January 31, 2012 www.Lulu.com Wageningen Arnhem Legal Notice: The information presented herein is for informative purposes only and not to receive any com- mercial benefits. Under no circumstances shall the authors of this Guide be liable for any loss, damage, liability or expense incurred or suffered which is claimed to resulted from use of this Guide, including without limita- tion, any fault, error, omission, interruption or delay with respect thereto (reliance at User’s own risk). This is a self-published document that presents opinions of the authors only and not of the associated organizations and/or user communities. Neither Wageningen University nor any person acting on behalf of Wageningen University is responsible for the use which may be made of this publication. This is the second, extended edition of the EUR 22191 EN (ISBN: 92-79-01703-9) Scientific and Technical Research series report published by the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxem- bourg. This book will be periodically updated. To obtain the most recent version please visit: http://stores.lulu.com/t_hengl Contact Addresses: Tomislav Hengl, ISRIC — World Soil Information, P.O. Box 353, 6700 AJ Wageningen Tel.: +31-(0)317-484199 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.isric.org Michael Gould Associates BV, Apeldoornseweg 21 Tel.: +31-(0)26 3516750 E-mail: [email protected] Wouter Gerritsma, Wageningen UR Library Tel.: +31-(0)317 483052 E-mail: [email protected] http://library.wur.nl Josip Vranjkovic,´ Zagreb, Croatia E-mail: [email protected] http://zanimacije.net This document was prepared using LATEX software.
  • Read Ijbh-2020-2

    Read Ijbh-2020-2

    ISSN 1805-8698 International Journal on Biomedicine IJBH and Healthcare YEAR 2020, VOLUME 8, ISSUE 2 Special issue on the Occasion of the 11th “Days of AMNuBiH 2020” and “SWEP 2020” www.ijbh.org Aim and scope Scope of the journal Founder and the First Editor-in-Chief of the journal has been Professor Jana Zvarova, Prague, Czech Republic who establieshed this journal in the year 2013.. The International Journal on Biomedicine and Healthcare (IJBH) is an online journal publishing submis- sions in English language. The journal aims to inform the readers about the latest developments in the field of biomedicine and healthcare, focusing on multidisciplinary approaches, new methods, results and innovations. It will publish original articles, short original articles, review articles, case reports, and short format articles reporting about advances of biomedicine and healthcare, abstracts of conference submissions, case-studies and articles that explore how science, education and policy are shaping the world and vice versa, editorial commentary, opinions from experts, information on projects, new equipment and innovations. Editorial Board Editor-in-Chief (University of Skopje, North Macedonia, http//orcid.org/0000-0000- Izet Masic (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, ORCID ID: http// 0000-0000), Prof. Mirko Grujic (University of Sarajevo, B&H, http//orcid. org/0000-0002-3130), Prof. Braco Hajdarevic (Mostar, B&H, http//www. www.orcid.org/0000-0002-90805456) orcid.org/0000-0002-7412-9312), Prof. Edward Hammond (WAAS, Statistical Editor Washington, USA, http//orcid.org/0000-0000-0000), Prof. Sefik Hasukic Slobodan Jankovic (Kragujevac, Serbia, ORCID ID: http://www. (University of Tuzla, B&H, http//orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-3745), Prof.
  • “Non-Predatory” Journals: a Discussion and Notes from Experts Askhat Myngbay,1 Zulfiya Orynbayeva,2 Kuat Oshakbayev,3 Abduzhappar Gaipov4

    “Non-Predatory” Journals: a Discussion and Notes from Experts Askhat Myngbay,1 Zulfiya Orynbayeva,2 Kuat Oshakbayev,3 Abduzhappar Gaipov4

    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE OF KAZAKHSTAN Бас Мақала / Передовая Статья / Editorial DOI: 10.23950/1812-2892-JCMK-00577 How to publish biomedical research in “non-predatory” journals: a discussion and notes from experts Askhat Myngbay,1 Zulfiya Orynbayeva,2 Kuat Oshakbayev,3 Abduzhappar Gaipov4 1Private Institution “National Laboratory Astana”, БИОМЕДИЦИНАЛЫҚ ЗЕРТТЕУЛЕРДІ «ЖЫРТҚЫШ Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan; ЕМЕС» ЖУРНАЛДАРДА ҚАЛАЙ ЖАРИЯЛАУҒА БОЛАДЫ: 2Department of Surgery, Drexel University College of САРАПШЫЛАРДАН ТАЛҚЫЛАУ ЖӘНЕ ЕСКЕРТУЛЕР Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Асхат Мыңбай, Зүлфия Орынбаева, Қуат Ошақбаев, Абдужаппар Гаипов 3Metabolic Syndrome Department, Nazarbayev University Medical Center, Astana, Kazakhstan; 4Department of Extracorporeal Hemocorrection, КАК ПУБЛИКОВАТЬ БИОМЕДИЦИНСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ В National Scientific Medical Center, Astana, Kazakhstan. «НЕ ХИЩНИЧЕСКИХ» ЖУРНАЛАХ: ОБСУЖДЕНИЕ И ЗАМЕТКИ On behalf of Editorial and Advisory Board of Journal of ЭКСПЕРТОВ Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan. Асхат Мынбай, Зульфия Орынбаева, Куат Ошакбаев, Абдужаппар Гайпов Received: 2018-03-15 Accepted: 2018-04-18 UDC: 616.12-008.313.2-07 J Clin Med Kaz 2018;2(48):6-8 It has become a trend among Kazakhstani researches “Journal of Environmental and Science Education” and “Man to publish in “Predatory” journals, which are, while initially in India”. About 200 and 100 articles were published in these indexed, then retracted from the peer-reviewed literature journals in 2016 correspondingly [3]. These numbers are large databases. The featured Beall’s list of Predatory Publishers enough to alarm researchers on the overall misunderstanding established by Jeffrey Beall from the University of Colorado in of the publishing practice. The objective of this letter is to help Denver, USA since 2008 annually analyzed and revealed potential researchers understand the concept of scholarly publishing and predatory journals from various publishers based on 48 criteria navigate them through choosing the right journals for submitting [1].
  • Research Integrity Corner

    Research Integrity Corner

    Research integrity corner Scientific author names: errors, corrections, and identity profiles Armen Yuri Gasparyan*1, Marlen Yessirkepov2, Alexey N. Gerasimov3, Elena I. Kostyukova4, George D. Kitas1,5 1Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK 2Department of Biochemistry, Biology and Microbiology, South Kazakhstan State Pharmaceutical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan 3Department of Statistics and Econometrics, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russian Federation 4Department of Accounting Management, Faculty of Accounting and Finance, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russian Federation 5Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Authorship problems are deep-rooted in the field of science communication. Some of these relate to lack of specific journal instructions. For de- cades, experts in journal editing and publishing have been exploring the authorship criteria and contributions deserving either co-authorship or acknowledgment. The issue of inconsistencies of listing and abbreviating author names has come to the fore lately. There are reports on the diffi- culties of figuring out Chinese surnames and given names of South Indians in scholarly articles. However, it seems that problems with correct listing and abbreviating author names are global. This article presents an example of swapping second (father’s) name with surname in a ‘predatory’ journal, where numerous instances of incorrectly identifying and crediting authors passed unnoticed for the journal editors, and no correction has been published. Possible solutions are discussed in relation to identifying author profiles and adjusting editorial policies to the emerging problems. Correcting mistakes with author names post-publication and integrating with the Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) platform are among them.