DOCSLIB.ORG

Research Integrity Corner

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research Integrity Corner Research integrity corner Scientific author names: errors, corrections, and identity profiles Armen Yuri Gasparyan*1, Marlen Yessirkepov2, Alexey N. Gerasimov3, Elena I. Kostyukova4, George D. Kitas1,5 1Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK 2Department of Biochemistry, Biology and Microbiology, South Kazakhstan State Pharmaceutical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan 3Department of Statistics and Econometrics, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russian Federation 4Department of Accounting Management, Faculty of Accounting and Finance, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russian Federation 5Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Authorship problems are deep-rooted in the field of science communication. Some of these relate to lack of specific journal instructions. For de- cades, experts in journal editing and publishing have been exploring the authorship criteria and contributions deserving either co-authorship or acknowledgment. The issue of inconsistencies of listing and abbreviating author names has come to the fore lately. There are reports on the diffi- culties of figuring out Chinese surnames and given names of South Indians in scholarly articles. However, it seems that problems with correct listing and abbreviating author names are global. This article presents an example of swapping second (father’s) name with surname in a ‘predatory’ journal, where numerous instances of incorrectly identifying and crediting authors passed unnoticed for the journal editors, and no correction has been published. Possible solutions are discussed in relation to identifying author profiles and adjusting editorial policies to the emerging problems. Correcting mistakes with author names post-publication and integrating with the Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) platform are among them. Key words: authorship; author names; science communication; identity; editorial policies Received: March 30, 2016 Accepted: May 07, 2016 Scale of the problem with author names identifying and crediting appropriate authors has Authorship problems are not new to the publish- been viewed as a daunting task for publishers and ing industry, and probably existed in the classical distributors of information. With the fast-growing writings long before the launch of the first schol- number of periodicals and ever-increasing num- arly journal, the Philosophical Transactions of the ber of co-authors in the current scholarly articles, Royal Society (1665). The notorious case of an Eng- authorship problems are becoming more complex lish poet and playwright William Shakespeare with and not easily discernible (3). ambiguous authenticity of his portraits, spellings The scale of the problem is reflected in the expo- of surname, and writing styles, which were record- nential increase of scholarly items tagged with the ed in the annals of history, teaches us a lesson. The term “authorship” in PubMed with the first record centuries-long uncertainties over his identity and appearing in 1895 and reaching a peak level of 372 debates over the authorship of his poems, claimed articles in 2014 (as of March 20, 2016). Overall, there by some to be ghost-written by noble people with are 5899 tagged items in PubMed, including 1891 exquisite language close to the royal court, contin- (32%) on the authorship criteria and only 129 ue well into the 21st century (1,2). For centuries, (2.2%) on author names. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2016.017 Biochemia Medica 2016;26(2):169–73 ©Copyright by Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 169 Gasparyan AY. et al. Scientific author names In fact, authorship criteria and contributorship are evaluating previous publications of prolific au- still widely discussed and are predominant topics thors, and particularly principal investigators. Fi- in the field. Recommendations are offered to all nally, authors’ names and their profiles are careful- those engaged in science communication to raise ly evaluated by editors, publishers, and represent- awareness of what constitutes ethical authorship atives of related academic institutions when dis- (4). Pointers on upgrading journal instructions putes arise over the authors’ contributions and in- have also been developed, though listing and ab- appropriate authorship, which may eventually breviating author names has been overlooked en- lead to retractions (10). tirely (5). In the era of digitization, the availability of various Properly listing scientific authors in an article is the platforms for archiving scholarly articles and build- first step toward ethical and successful writing (6). ing up individual profiles makes it easier to identi- Strict adherence to the journal authorship policy fy and evaluate academic records. Examples of and format of author names make the initial im- such platforms are the Scopus Author Identifier pression on the reviewers, editors, and other read- (Elsevier), ResearcherID (Thomson Reuters), Pub- ers of the article. Editors and publishers overlook- Med, Google Scholar Citations, ResearchGate, and ing the accuracy of adhering to the authorship LinkedIn. Eminent scientists with life-long achieve- regulations expose their journals to misconduct ments may also have Wikipedia profiles. Authors and limit their chances of post-publication com- who publish articles indexed by Scopus, Web of munication. Science, PubMed, and visible in Google Scholar Authors of scholarly articles deserve to be proper- have their records, which are visible to the data- ly identified with their real names and credited to base users. The database indexers process author continuously contribute to science communica- names in the first place and link to their articles. tion (7). The issue of identification often arises The authors who correctly spell and list their own when research fellows search for highly skilled in- names in the author by-lines from their very first ternational mentors for their under- and post- publication contribute to the expedient recording graduate studies and research. Journal editors also of academic output and build-up of the individual encounter the same issue when they process sub- platforms. The Scopus Author Identifier incorpo- missions and pick potential reviewers by evaluat- rates different name formats of the same author ing the corresponding authors’ profiles. They may within a single digital identifier, which partly re- also need photographs of the authors to credit solves the issue of author name disambiguation. In and preserve profiles of the most influential schol- case of different, automatically created author pro- ars for the future (8). On the positive side, by re- files in Scopus, the scholars, representatives of cording authors’ correct names and linking to their their institutions, and other interested persons affiliations, editors simultaneously credit academic may request merges. institutions and other organizations where schol- To correctly identify authors, indexers refer to the ars conduct research. On the negative side, track- submissions from current and previous primary ing the most prolific authors’ records and analysing sources (journals), linked affiliations, and geo- their conflicting relationships with pharmaceutical graphical locations, to name just a few identifying companies enabled questioning the trustworthi- options. Affiliations and geographic origin may ness of some ‘evidence-based’ publications influ- change throughout an academic career, which is encing diagnostic and curative standards (9). Here why many other factors should be considered to we are reminded of numerous practice guidelines maintain profile of an individual scientific author where authors are “big” names with extensive re- in a database. lationships with pharmaceutical companies. For research purposes, and particularly for distin- Funding agencies processing grant applications guishing the gender of the main contributors, the pay due attention to the names of the listed inves- authors’ scholarly profiles may be evaluated along- tigators and predict potential academic output by side their records on the institutional websites and Biochemia Medica 2016;26(2):169–73 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2016.017 170 Gasparyan AY. et al. Scientific author names social networking platforms to find photographs There have been numerous instances of journal and biographical notes (11). However, even such a editors’ unawareness of their international authors’ detailed processing of author records fails to identi- traditions and carelessness of both editors and au- fy gender in 3% of cases, which points to the need thors throughout the manuscript processing, for more advanced and complex author identifiers. proofreading and publishing that perpetuated er- rors with abbreviation and placement of names. Confusion with author names One of the striking incidents of swapping surnames and middle (fathers’) names took place in the For decades, the issue of incorrectly abbreviated, ‘predatory’ journals. Predatory journals are known misspelled,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Correspondence Handicapped Research Institutions Winning the Global Research Competition: a Focus on Croatia
    May 2014; 40(2) 53 European Science Editing Correspondence Handicapped research institutions winning the global research competition: A focus on Croatia We recently introduced a web application linked to spatial in their home country are highlighted. As a good example, visualization approaches and published academic ranking Figure 1 depicts some research institutions from Croatia lists (eg the Academic Ranking of World Universities that are included in the excellence mapping of medicine. The [ARWU]).1 This application maps and ranks academic country ranking is corrected for the Corruption Perception and research institutions by a statistical method which Index (CPI) which is set to a global mean. Controlling for integrates factors influencing research performance – Best the CPI results in a meaningful increase in the performance Paper and Best Journal Rates (see www.excellencemapping. of Croatian academic and research institutions; suggesting net). The best paper rate is the proportion of papers that that corruption handicaps scientific research. In fact, the belongs to 10% of the world’s most cited papers, while the University of Zagreb improves its ranking by 228 positions best journal rate is the proportion of papers published in after correcting for the CPI, or by excluding the potential 25% of the world’s most influential journals. influence of corruption. This university is viewed as a One of the potential confounders of research strong and winning global competition institution, with the performance is the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). adjusted Best Paper Rate reaching 13.2%, or approximately Countries with high GDP are generally better represented 3% greater than the expected Best Paper Rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Integrity Corner
    Research integrity corner What’s in a name, anyway? Farrokh Habibzadeh* Past President of the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) Editor and Founder of the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (IJOEM) *Corresponding author: [email protected] Key words: authorship; journal software system; editorial policy Received: May 1, 2016 Accepted: May 2, 2016 In prehistoric matrifocal societies, children were thor. However, some records belonging to other identified by their mothers, not their fathers. This researchers, for similarity of authors’ names are re- did not last long and the era of patriarchy began. trieved and factitiously may be counted for the au- Thereafter, people were recognized by their fa- thor under question. In some countries, some thers. This shift in genealogy has clearly been re- names are very prevalent and finding two or more flected in Greek mythology – the defeat of the people with similar names is not uncommon. Find- goddess Gaia and Titans by Zeus and Olympian ing out what record really belongs to “who” some- gods. times is very difficult and time-consuming (1). Dif- We have used names, particularly surnames, to ferent spelling of names makes the situation even identify people who are related. However, this has worse – some records may not be retrieved at all been done in various ways in different societies. by a simple search. While in many western countries we use a given Several proposals to solve this “authority control” (first) name and a surname (family name) to iden- issue have so far been proposed. In 2009, we pro- tify a person, in Arab countries, there are in fact no posed a unique identifier, the so-called “AID”, to be surnames; people use their given name followed assigned to researchers (1).
    [Show full text]
  • PREVALENCE of POTENTIALLY PREDATORY PUBLISHING in SCOPUS on the COUNTRY LEVEL 1 Prevalence of Potentially Predatory Publishing in Scopus on the Country Level
    PREVALENCE OF POTENTIALLY PREDATORY PUBLISHING IN SCOPUS ON THE COUNTRY LEVEL 1 Prevalence of Potentially Predatory Publishing in Scopus on the Country Level Tatiana Savinay∗ Ivan Sterligovy y National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia ∗Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Moscow, Russia. [email protected] [email protected] F Abstract—We present results of a large-scale study of po- of various degree of competence as well as by tentially predatory journals (PPJ) represented in the Scopus researchers themselves [Leydesdorff et al., 2016]. database, which is widely used for research evaluation. Both In short, research evaluation has become substan- journal metrics and country/disciplinary data have been evalu- tially more formalized relying on various indicators, ated for different groups of PPJ: those listed by Jeffrey Beall which are mostly based on publication and citation and those discontinued by Scopus because of “publication con- counts. This metrics explosion is partially attributed cerns”. Our results show that even after years of discontinuing, hundreds of active potentially predatory journals are still highly to the priorities of many nations and organizations visible in the Scopus database. PPJ papers are continuously to reproduce the success of world leaders in science produced by all major countries, but with different prevalence. and technology. Most ASJC (All Science Journal Classification) subject areas In this paper, we provide a bird’s eye view of the are affected. The largest number of PPJ papers are in engineer- growth of articles in potentially predatory journals ing and medicine. On average, PPJ have much lower citation (PPJ), a global phenomenon stemming from both metrics than other Scopus-indexed journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Integrity Corner: Special Issue on Predatory Journals Review
    Research integrity corner: Special issue on predatory journals Review Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals Lorraine E. Ferris*1, Margaret A Winker2 1Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 2Secretary, World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Predatory journals, or journals that charge an article processing charge (APC) to authors, yet do not have the hallmarks of legitimate scholarly jour- nals such as peer review and editing, Editorial Boards, editorial offices, and other editorial standards, pose a number of new ethical issues in journal publishing. This paper discusses ethical issues around predatory journals and publishing in them. These issues include misrepresentation; lack of editorial and publishing standards and practices; academic deception; research and funding wasted; lack of archived content; and undermining confidence in research literature. It is important that the scholarly community, including authors, institutions, editors, and publishers, support the legitimate scholarly research enterprise, and avoid supporting predatory journals by not publishing in them, serving as their editors or on the Edito- rial Boards, or permitting faculty to knowingly publish in them without consequences. Key words: predatory journals; publication ethics; medical publishing Received: March 12, 2017 Accepted: May 11, 2017 Introduction Predatory journals, or journals that charge an arti- nals (3), making ways to identify them increasingly cle processing charge (APC) to authors, yet do not important. Several authors have suggested useful have the hallmarks of legitimate scholarly journals approaches and authors should apply such sug- such as peer review and editing, Editorial Boards, gestions before submitting their work to a journal editorial offices, and other editorial standards, that may be predatory (4-8).
    [Show full text]
  • Editing a Scientific Journal in Croatia: the Case of Biochemia Medica
    European Science Editing 69 August 2012; 38(3) Editing a scientific journal in Croatia: the case of Biochemia Medica Ana-Maria Simundic Editor in chief, Biochemia Medica; Clinical Institute of Chemistry, University Hospital Center “SESTRE MILOSRDNICE”, Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] Seven years ago, I attract great authors and encourages them to submit their joined the editorial work to Biochemia Medica. We frequently invite presenters at board of Biochemia relevant conferences, PhD students, residents and Croatian Medica, the English- scientists abroad to contribute to the journal. To assist our language, peer- authors, we published a series of articles on biostatistics reviewed journal of and research methodology.3 Moreover, we established the Croatian Society of constructive, comprehensive and author-supportive peer Medical Biochemists review to further increase the quality of the journal. (CSMB). Its 16th anniversary coincided Quality of the editorial work with a major re-design1 Biochemia Medica is an open-access journal. All articles when two co-editors in are freely available in HTML and PDF format. A signed chief were appointed, authorship statement and a copyright transfer form are and I was offered a post required for any submission. The authors are responsible of an assistant editor. for research integrity and ethical authorship. They should Our editorial policy was to gain international recognition ensure that all contributors listed as authors made a in the field of laboratory medicine. For a journal from a small significant contribution to the work. scientific community, this recognition could be earned by All submissions to the journal are handled by the editor adhering to internationally acceptable publishing standards in chief and assistant editors.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editors' Desks
    August 2012; 38(3) 57 European Science Editing Publications Committee From the Editors’ Desks Chief editor Armen Yuri Gasparyan The eleventh Annual General Meeting report that for the first time in several [email protected] was held in Tallinn: the President’s years we made a small surplus in 2011. Production editor full report is on the website. Several This was mainly due to rigorous cost Lynne Rowland [email protected] members of Council stepped down and control. Our membership, which is our Secretary we appreciate all their contributions main source of income, fell from 538 Mary Hodgson to EASE. So, my thanks to my two at the end of 2010 to 462 at the end of [email protected] Vice-Presidents, Alison Clayson, who 2011, but seems to have stabilized. If has done an excellent job coordinating you enjoy being a member of EASE, as European Science Editing Membership recruitment and retention, we hope you do, please spread the word Articles and correspondence and Reme Melero, who has organized to colleagues and help to make us an Armen Yuri Gasparyan many successful seminars and will even better organization. [email protected] continue to do so. I am also grateful It was a pleasure to announce the Book reviews to Petter Oscarsson for his work on award of an Honorary Life Fellowship Moira Johnson [email protected] the Handbook, Edward Towpik for to Elisabeth Heseltine for her services to EASE-Forum digest hosting courses in Warsaw and, of EASE and the scientific community in Elise Langdon-Neuner course, Mare-Anne Laane for facilitating teaching science writing (see p70).
    [Show full text]
  • “Non-Predatory” Journals: a Discussion and Notes from Experts Askhat Myngbay,1 Zulfiya Orynbayeva,2 Kuat Oshakbayev,3 Abduzhappar Gaipov4
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE OF KAZAKHSTAN Бас Мақала / Передовая Статья / Editorial DOI: 10.23950/1812-2892-JCMK-00577 How to publish biomedical research in “non-predatory” journals: a discussion and notes from experts Askhat Myngbay,1 Zulfiya Orynbayeva,2 Kuat Oshakbayev,3 Abduzhappar Gaipov4 1Private Institution “National Laboratory Astana”, БИОМЕДИЦИНАЛЫҚ ЗЕРТТЕУЛЕРДІ «ЖЫРТҚЫШ Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan; ЕМЕС» ЖУРНАЛДАРДА ҚАЛАЙ ЖАРИЯЛАУҒА БОЛАДЫ: 2Department of Surgery, Drexel University College of САРАПШЫЛАРДАН ТАЛҚЫЛАУ ЖӘНЕ ЕСКЕРТУЛЕР Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Асхат Мыңбай, Зүлфия Орынбаева, Қуат Ошақбаев, Абдужаппар Гаипов 3Metabolic Syndrome Department, Nazarbayev University Medical Center, Astana, Kazakhstan; 4Department of Extracorporeal Hemocorrection, КАК ПУБЛИКОВАТЬ БИОМЕДИЦИНСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ В National Scientific Medical Center, Astana, Kazakhstan. «НЕ ХИЩНИЧЕСКИХ» ЖУРНАЛАХ: ОБСУЖДЕНИЕ И ЗАМЕТКИ On behalf of Editorial and Advisory Board of Journal of ЭКСПЕРТОВ Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan. Асхат Мынбай, Зульфия Орынбаева, Куат Ошакбаев, Абдужаппар Гайпов Received: 2018-03-15 Accepted: 2018-04-18 UDC: 616.12-008.313.2-07 J Clin Med Kaz 2018;2(48):6-8 It has become a trend among Kazakhstani researches “Journal of Environmental and Science Education” and “Man to publish in “Predatory” journals, which are, while initially in India”. About 200 and 100 articles were published in these indexed, then retracted from the peer-reviewed literature journals in 2016 correspondingly [3]. These numbers are large databases. The featured Beall’s list of Predatory Publishers enough to alarm researchers on the overall misunderstanding established by Jeffrey Beall from the University of Colorado in of the publishing practice. The objective of this letter is to help Denver, USA since 2008 annually analyzed and revealed potential researchers understand the concept of scholarly publishing and predatory journals from various publishers based on 48 criteria navigate them through choosing the right journals for submitting [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Journal List of Scopus.Xlsx
    Sourcerecord id Source Title (CSA excl.) (Medline-sourced journals are indicated in Green). Print-ISSN Including Conference Proceedings available in the scopus.com Source Browse list 16400154734 A + U-Architecture and Urbanism 03899160 5700161051 A Contrario. Revue interdisciplinaire de sciences sociales 16607880 19600162043 A.M.A. American Journal of Diseases of Children 00968994 19400157806 A.M.A. archives of dermatology 00965359 19600162081 A.M.A. Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology 00965979 19400157807 A.M.A. archives of industrial health 05673933 19600162082 A.M.A. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Medicine 00966703 19400157808 A.M.A. archives of internal medicine 08882479 19400158171 A.M.A. archives of neurology 03758540 19400157809 A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry 00966886 19400157810 A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology 00966339 19400157811 A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology 00966894 19400157812 A.M.A. archives of pathology 00966711 19400157813 A.M.A. archives of surgery 00966908 5800207606 AAA, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 01715410 28033 AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication 07434618 50013 AACE International. Transactions of the Annual Meeting 15287106 19300156808 AACL Bioflux 18448143 4700152443 AACN Advanced Critical Care 15597768 26408 AACN clinical issues 10790713 51879 AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing 10467467 26729 AANA Journal 00946354 66438 AANNT journal / the American Association of Nephrology Nurses and Technicians 07441479 5100155055 AAO Journal 27096 AAOHN
    [Show full text]
  • BM 22-1.Indd
    Editorial Biomedical research platforms and their infl uence on article submissions and journal rankings: An update. Giuseppe Lippi1, Emmanuel J Favaloro2, Ana-Maria Simundic3 1U.O. Diagnostica Ematochimica, Dipartimento di Patologia e Medicina di Laboratorio, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy 2Department of Haematology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research (ICPMR), Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia 3University Department of Chemistry, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract After being indexed in 2006 in EMBASE/Excerpta Medica and Scopus, and later in Science Citation Index Expanded and Journal Citation Reports/ Science Edition citation databases, Biochemia Medica launched a new web page and online manuscript submission system in 2010, and celebrated its fi rst Impact Factor in the same year. Now, starting from the end of the 2011, the journal will also be indexed in PubMed/Medline, and this will contribute to increase the journal’s exposure and accessibility worldwide. This is an important breakthrough, which is expected to further increase the popularity of the journal, as well as the submission rate and citations. Although several tools are currently available as Web resources to retrieve scientifi c articles, whose functioning and basic criteria are thought to be rather similar, the functionality, coverage, notoriety and prominence may diff er widely. The recent indexing ofBiochemia Medica in PubMed/Medline has thereby
    [Show full text]
  • Biochemia Medica“
    PRIMJER KRAĐE IDENTITETA I SADRŽAJA ČASOPISA Prof. dr. sc Daria Pašalić Časopis „Biochemia Medica“ od 2006. godine do zaslugom danas postaje izdaje Hrvatsko dugogodišnje međunarodno društvo za urednice Ana-Marie izlazi u različitim prepoznat i medicinsku Šimundić dosegao oblicima još od indeksiran u svim biokemiju i najvišu razinu koju 1991. značajnim laboratorijsku ima jedan međunarodnim medicinu, znanstveni časopis u bibliografskim Republici Hrvatskoj. bazama Brzi napredak u citiranosti časopisa Politika časopisa Stroga pravila etičnosti Sustav otkrivanja plagijata Reviewer invitation Međunarodne recenzije-dvostruko slijepi pristup Otvoreni pristup člancima, CC-BY Objava članak je besplatna za autore Politika časopisa Glavni Urednik za Glavni urednik znanstveno- urednik istraživačku • “Scope”? • Šalje u daljnju Najmanje • Kvaliteta? čestitost procedure Pomoćni dva Pomoćni Glavni • Autorstvo • Vraća autoru na korekcije urednik neovisna urednik urednik • “Cross-check” • odbacuje recenzenta • Etičko, … informirani pristnak U listopadu 2019. lansirna je nova web stranica https://www.biochemia-medica.com/en/ Cjelokupni sadržaj članaka sa prethodne web-stranice prebačen je na novu 21.12.2019. postavljam obavijest o odsutnosti na obje svoje adrese elektroničke pošte [email protected] [email protected] vezana za [email protected] JCR, SCOPUS, PUBMED 26.12. 2018. Biochemia Medica: JCR (Impact Factor: • Na adresu elektronske pošte 3.653), Scopus and Pubmed [email protected] dolazi mail Dear Colleague, Best of the
    [Show full text]
  • Research Integrity Corner
    Research integrity corner Evaluation of articles in metabolism research on the basis of their citations Yi Xiang Zhan*1, D’arcy Turner1, Daniela Tritz2, Kelly Natarajan2, Mo Som2, Matt Vassar2 1Department of Research, Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, USA 2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Tulsa, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Introduction: The number of research papers and journals each year is increasing and millions of dollars are spent. Despite this there is evidence to suggest that many publications do not impact clinical practice. We used citation analysis to measure the influence of metabolism publications from 2003-2013. Those papers with lower citation rates are likely to be of the least value and high rates of such publications may be a marker of research waste. Materials and methods: We analysed 67 journals with 81,954 articles related to metabolism indexed on the Scopus station database from 2003- 2013. We identified those articles with less than 5 citations within 5 years from publication date as poorly cited. Journals were ranked by the percen- tage of articles that were poorly cited or uncited. Results: Over the 10-year period, the number of total articles increased by 127%. We found that 24% of articles were poorly cited within 5 years of publication. Journals in the bottom 25% and top 25% of rankings by citation rates accounted for a similar proportion of poorly cited articles. Most of the open access journals were ranked in the top 25% for citation rates. Conclusions: Our analysis contradicts concerns over increasing amounts of publications with little impact.
    [Show full text]