TABLE 3.16 Enacting Legislation: Veto, Veto Override and Effective Date
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
WHTP-2009-06-National-Security-1.Pdf
ABOUT THE AUTHOR Louis Fisher is Specialist in Constitutional Law with the Law Library of the Library of Congress. The views expressed here are personal, not institutional. Earlier in his career at the Library of Congress, Fisher worked for the Congressional Research Service from 1970 to March 3, 2006. During his service with CRS he was Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers and research director of the House Iran-Contra Committee in 1987, writing major sections of the final report. Fisher received his doctorate in political science from the New School for Social Research and has taught at a number of universities and law schools. He is the author of eighteen books, including In the Name of National Security: Unchecked Presidential Power and the Reynolds Case (2006), Presidential War Power (2d ed. 2004), Military Tribunals and Presidential Power (2005), The Politics of Executive Privilege (2004), American Constitutional Law (with Katy J. Harriger, 8th ed. 2009), Constitutional Conflicts between Congress and the Presidency (5th ed. 2005), Nazi Saboteurs on Trial: A Military Tribunal and American Law (2003), and, most recently, The Constitution and 9/11: Recurring Threats to America’s Freedoms (2008). He has received four book awards. Fisher has been invited to testify before Congress on such issues as war powers, state secrets, CIA whistle-blowing, covert spending, NSA surveillance, executive privilege, executive spending discretion, presidential reorganization authority, Congress and the Constitution, the legislative veto, the item veto, the pocket veto, recess appointments, the budget process, the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act, the balanced budget amendment, biennial budgeting, presidential impoundment powers, and executive lobbying. -
League of Women Voters of Maine Study Report on Citizens' Initiatives
League of Women Voters of Maine Study Report on Citizens’ Initiatives and People’s Veto Referenda Study Committee Members: Beth Basham Barbara Kaufman Valerie Kelly Kim Peaslee Judy Whiting Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................... ii List of Appendices (see separate document) ............................................................................................ ii Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................. iii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ iv 1. Origin and Goals of the Study........................................................................................................... 1 2. “Participatory” (or “Direct”) Democracy within Representative Government ................................... 3 3. Maine Citizens’ Initiatives and People’s Veto Referenda: 1908–2018 ............................................... 8 A. How Many CI/PVR Have Maine Citizens Introduced? .................................................................... 8 B. What Are the Issues and Outcomes Associated with Maine’s CIs/PVRs? ....................................... 8 C. -
Settlement and 1796 Constitution • the Area That Became Tennessee
••••••••••••TENNESSEE CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY Settlement and 1796 Constitution • The area that became Tennessee was part of the 1663 land grant of North Carolina from Charles II. • In violation of the British Proclamation of 1763 prohibiting settlements west of the Appalachian Mountains, the Watauga settlement was founded in 1771. (T. R's "Great Leap Westward" He wrote that Robertson and Sevier were two of the three greatest leaders in the development west of the mountains, the third being George Rogers Clark) The Watauga Association adopted articles to govern their settlement in 1772—this was the first government west of the mountains. The last British Governor of Virginia, the Earl of Dunmore, wrote in 1774 that Watauga was "a dangerous example to the people of America of forming governments distinct from and independent of his majesty's authority." In 1775, Richard Henderson purchased a large area of Kentucky and Middle Tennessee from the Cherokees--20 million acres for 6 wagon loads of goods. The governments of Virginia and North Carolina refused to recognize it. It was Henderson who was behind the settlement of Nashville in 1779-80. James Robertson led most of the men and the livestock over land to the settlement. John Donelson led a flotilla by water, down the Tennessee River to the Ohio, up the Ohio to the Cumberland, and up the Cumberland to the settlement. The Cumberland Compact was signed in 1780. It provided for the government of the settlement. · After being ignored by North Carolina for many years, the eastern settlements attempt to form the state of Franklin in 1784. -
CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
Order Code RS22188 Updated January 4, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Regular Vetoes and Pocket Vetoes: An Overview Kevin R. Kosar Analyst in American National Government Government and Finance Division Summary The veto power vested in the President by Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution has proven to be an effective tool for the chief executive in his dealings with Congress. Since the founding of the federal government in 1789, 35 of 43 Presidents have exercised their veto authority a total of 2,550 times. Congress has overridden these vetoes on 106 occasions (4.2%). Presidents have vetoed 80 appropriations bills, and Congress has overridden 12 (15.0%) of these vetoes. This report will be updated at the beginning of each new Congress. Constitutional Basis and Importance To become law, the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 7) provides that all bills that have been approved by both houses of Congress must be presented to the President for his approval and signature.1 The President may sign a bill into law within the 10-day period (excluding Sundays) provided in the Constitution,2 let it become law without his signature, or veto it. The Constitution states that, when the President vetoes a bill, “he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated.” This type of action is called a “regular” or “return” veto. If, on the other hand, Congress has adjourned within the 10-day period after presentation of the bill to the President (thereby preventing the return of the bill to Congress), the President may simply withhold his signature, and the bill does not become law — a practice that has been dubbed a “pocket” veto.3 The President’s veto authority is among his most significant tools in legislative 1 These bills include joint resolutions, but do not include proposed amendments to the Constitution, which require a two-thirds vote in each house, and are sent directly to the states for approval. -
Constitution Of
MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) ,.,.... .... DOCUMENTS J'RINTE]) BY DIRECTION OF THE GOVERNOR, AND BY ORDER OF THE LEGISL!TURE, !'OB TBE YEAB. A. D. 1839. VOL. 1 . .ll.UGUST.11.: SMITH & ROBINSON1 PRINTERS TO THE STATE. 1839. RULES AND ORDERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, OF THE ST ATE OF MAINE. I - - - -~ ------------ -- aunusta: SMITH & ROBINSON, ........ PRINTERS. 1839. HousE OF REPRESENTATIVES,~ January 7, 1839. S ORDERED, That the Clerk of this House, cause eight hun~ dred copies of the Rules and Orders, together with the Con atitution of the United States, and of this State ; the names of the members of the House, and the number of their seats ; the names of the members of the Senate ; of the several officers of each House ; of the Governor and Council, and of the officers of the several Departments of the State Government ; with a list of tl1e Standing Committees of each House, and of the Joint Standing Committees, to be printed for the use of th~ House. [Extract from the Journal.] ATTEliiT: CHARLES WATERHOUSE, Cleric. OF THE UNITED ST ATES. WE, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquil lity, provide for the common defence, promote the general wel fare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. -
Constitution of Maine
MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) DOCUMENTS PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISJ~.A.TURE, OF TH:E STATE OF MAINE, JlUIUNG ITS StSSION A. :0. 1940. • JlU GUST.fl: WM. R. SMITH & CO., PRINTERS TO THE STA TE. 1840. RULES AND ORDERS OF THl!: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF MAINE . •JUGUST.Jl: S:\IITH & ROBINSON, PRINTERS TO THE STATE, 1840, STATE OF MAINE. HousE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 1 January 7, 1840. 5 ORDERED, That the Clerk of this House, cause eight hundred copies of the Rules and Orders, together with the Constitution of the United States, and of this Stafe; the names of the members of the House, and the number of their seats ; the names of the members of the Senate; of the several officers of each House; of the Governor and Council, ahd of the officers of the several Departments of the State Government; with a list of the Standing Committees of each House, and of the Joint Standing Commit• tees, to be printed for the use of the House. [Extract from the Journal.] ATTEST: ELBRIDGE GERRY, Clerk OF THE .UNITED STATES. WE, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquili ty, provide for the common defence, promote the general wel fare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. -
Constitution of Maine
MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) DOClU~IENTS PRL"i'.TED BY ORDER OF THE JLEGrISLA11 URE OF TUE STATE OF MAINE, DCitDiG ITS SESSION A. D. 1856. PART FIRST. §lttgnstn: FULLER&:: FULLER, PRINTERS TO THE STATE. 1 8 5 G. RULEiS AND ORDERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF MAINE, 18 5 6. FULLER & FULLER, PRINTERS. 18 5 6. JQSIAH ~: LITT~~' Rortlan4, SP1;:.A.1rn~ [ill®(!!J~~ ®lf 00[.g[f)rfil@~@~u IA uawrn~~ PA YJD DJJNN, f,0Ja11iJ1 WH.,liUl\! L,. !'UTNJ CLER!j:, A~sISTAMT Cua ,.;.,,· .. 'r"---- -" ~ ... c:: 12 11 10 9 8 7 JOHN C. TALBOT, JR., I SAMUEL S. DAKIN, WM. S. COCHRAN, KOAH BARKER, JOHN W. COFFIN, JOHN N. SWAZEY, Lubec. Carmel, Waldo borough. Exeter. Chenyfie!d. Bucksport. i Rep"'"' J 28 27 25 25 24 23 22 21 20 JEREMIAH FOSTER,\ THOS. PATTERSON, JOSEPH IRISH, DANCEL HOWES, EDMUND DA)TA, ISAAC W. BRITTON, SAMUEL S. VYING, P. P. BURLEIGH, C. C. CUSH!v East Machias. Madison. Union. New Sharon. vViscasset. VFinslow. Brunswick. Linneus. Hebron. I ~~ ~~~I~~ 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 H. W. JOHNSON, THOS . .l\f. MORROW, JOHN m:;:vrn, JAMES TRICKEY, ALBERT MOORE, THOiWAS OWEN, E. PEARSON, Ja., ISAAC HOBART, JOHN R. SW Bluebill. Searsmont. Robbinston. Cape Elizabeth. North Anson. Leeds. Machias. Edmunds. -
History of Maine - History Index - MHS Kathy Amoroso
The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine History Documents Special Collections 2019 History of Maine - History Index - MHS Kathy Amoroso Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistory Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Amoroso, Kathy, "History of Maine - History Index - MHS" (2019). Maine History Documents. 220. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistory/220 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Index to Maine History publication Vol. 9 - 12 Maine Historical Society Newsletter 13 - 33 Maine Historical Society Quarterly 34 – present Maine History Vol. 9 – 51.1 1969 - 2017 1 A a' Becket, Maria, J.C., landscape painter, 45:203–231 Abandonment of settlement Besse Farm, Kennebec County, 44:77–102 and reforestation on Long Island, Maine (case study), 44:50–76 Schoodic Point, 45:97–122 The Abenaki, by Calloway (rev.), 30:21–23 Abenakis. see under Native Americans Abolitionists/abolitionism in Maine, 17:188–194 antislavery movement, 1833-1855 (book review), 10:84–87 Liberty Party, 1840-1848, politics of antislavery, 19:135–176 Maine Antislavery Society, 9:33–38 view of the South, antislavery newspapers (1838-1855), 25:2–21 Abortion, in rural communities, 1904-1931, 51:5–28 Above the Gravel Bar: The Indian Canoe Routes of Maine, by Cook (rev.), 25:183–185 Academy for Educational development (AED), and development of UMaine system, 50(Summer 2016):32–41, 45–46 Acadia book reviews, 21:227–229, 30:11–13, 36:57–58, 41:183–185 farming in St. -
Pocket Veto ‑ General” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R
The original documents are located in Box 1, folder “Pocket Veto ‑ General” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Exact duplicates within this folder were not digitized. Digitized from Box 1 of the White House Records Office Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library 1/30/76 Mr. Jones: FYI and retentiono Original was sent to Mr. Schmults today for appropriate handling. Katie ®ffin' of tqr .Attomry <Grnrral llht.s~ingtnn, D.<!:. 20~30 January 29, 1976 The President The White House Washington, D. C. Dear Mr. President: The Department of Justice is presently involved in a case which raises the question whether a President may lawfully use . a pocket veto during intra-session an6 inter-session adjournments of Congress. That case, Kennedy v. Jones, is now pending in the District Court for the District of Columbia and concerns two bills uhich were pocket vetoed, the first by President Nixon during the sine die adjournment of the 1st Session of the 93rd Congress, which lastea-19 days, and the other by you during a 32-day intra-session recess taken by both Houses of the 93rd Congress. -
Basic Training
PARLIAMENTARY PROCESS, BASIC FACTS, AND STRATEGIES Parliamentary BOOt camp TRAINING The Final Steps: Enrollment, Enactment, and Vetoes After legislation passes both Houses of Congress in the same form, the Constitution provides that it be “presented” to the President for his signature. The process of preparing the bill, known as “enrollment,” ensures that the version given to the President for signing is the true and correct representation of the legislation passed by Congress. Upon presentment, the President may either sign the bill, enacting it into law, or refuse to sign it, vetoing the legislation. ENROLLMENT houses must pass a concurrent resolution After a bill or joint resolution passes both requesting that the President return the the House and Senate and reaches its final enrolled bill prior to enactment. form, the chamber that the legislation The more commonly arising issue, how- originated in enrolls the bill for pre- sentment to the President for either his ever, occurs when the bill is correctly signature or veto. The enrollment process enrolled by the Clerk and the Secretary, includes both the careful examination of yet is done so with an error in the underly- the official text to ensure it is the exact ing legislative language passed by both text passed by both houses, and the print- Houses. In this case, both Houses must ing of the dually -adopted final version pass a concurrent resolution directing on parchment paper. In the House, the the enrolling official (either the Clerk or Clerk oversees this process; in the Senate, the Secretary, as the case may be) to “cor- the Secretary of the Senate sustains the rect” the enrollment of the bill. -
The Legislature, -~:2!?#-:7
MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) DOCUMENTS PRl~TED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISLATURE, -~:2!?#-:7. STATE OF MAINEi DURING ITS SESSIOl.'I' A.. D. 1841. ~UJJUlta: SEVERANCE AND DORR, PRINTERS TO THE STATE. I 8 4 1. RULES AN]) OltDERS OP THE OF THE STATE OF MAINE, I 8 41. aunu~ta: SJ1:n:RANCE & DORR, .... PRINTEJlS .. 1 84 l, HousE OF REPRESENTATIVES, ( January 15, 1841. 5 ORDERED, That the Clerk of this House, cause eight hun dred copies of the Rules and Orders, together with the Constitution of the United States, and of this State ; the names of the members of the House,and the number of their seats ; the names of the members of the Senate ; of the sev eral officers of each House ; of the Governor and Council, and of the officers of the several Departments of the State Government ; with a list of the Standing Committees of each House, and of the Joint Standing Committees ; with the Census of this State ; to be printed for the use of the House. [Extract from the Journal.] ATTEST: GEORGE C. GETCHELL, Clerk. OF THE UNITED STATES. WE, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tran quillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselveia, and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. -
Lincoln's Reconstruction Plan Vs. the Radical Republicans
Lincoln's Reconstruction Plan vs. the Radical Republicans Annotation Reconstruction was the period during which the United States began to rebuild after the Civil War, lasting from 1865 to 1877, although some historians use 1863 (Emancipation Proclamation) as the starting point. The term also refers to the process the federal government used to readmit the Confederate states. Complicating the process was that Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson (President after Lincoln), and both the moderate and Radical Republicans in Congress had differing views on how to handle the situation. Lincoln, prior to his assassination by John Wilkes Booth (5 days after the war ended), had made it clear that he favored a lenient Reconstruction policy. In December of 1863 (well before the war ended) Lincoln announced his Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction, also known as the 10 Percent Plan. Lincoln’s moderate Reconstruction plan angered both moderate and Radical Republicans in Congress. Led by Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts and Representative Thaddeus Stevens of Pennsylvania, the Radicals wanted to ensure complete social and political equality for the freed blacks, while the moderates desired much of the same, but were less willing to use the law to grant that equality. In July 1864, the Radicals responded to the 10 Percent Plan by passing the Wade-Davis Bill, which proposed that Congress, not the President, be responsible for Reconstruction. The Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction, December 8, 1863. (a.k.a… the 10% Bill) http://www.history.umd.edu/Freedmen/procamn.htm WHEREAS…by the Constitution of the United States, it is provided that the President "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offences against the United States…" and …Whereas, a rebellion now exists … the loyal state governments of several states have for a long time been subverted, and many persons have committed, and are now guilty of, treason against the United States; and Whereas, with reference to said rebellion and treason [i.e.