Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae) RADAR Research Archive and Digital Asset Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Note if anything has been removed from thesis. Map on p233 When referring to this work, the full bibliographic details must be given as follows: Hogan, J. E. (2012) Taxonomy, Systematics and Biogeography of the Scaritinae (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae). PhD Thesis. Oxford Brookes University. WWW.BROOKES.AC.UK/GO/RADAR Taxonomy, Systematics and Biogeography of the Scaritinae (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae) James Edward Hogan Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the award of Doctor of Philosophy Oxford Brookes University December 2012 Abstract Scaritinae are a subfamily of ground beetles (Carabidae), containing about 1900 species and 125 genera. They share a distinctive body shape linked to a burrowing lifestyle. The diversity of Scaritinae is concentrated in the tropics and warmer regions of the southern hemisphere, particularly Southern Africa, Madagascar and Australia. The evolutionary history (phylogeny) of scaritines is unknown, leading to conflicting classification schemes and uncertainty over the definition of genera, especially in one sub- group of scaritines, the tribe Scaritini. In particular, it is unclear whether Scaritinae are descended from a common ancestor (monophyletic) or whether they are an artificial group defined by convergent adaptations to burrowing. Phylogenetic relationships of the Scaritinae were investigated in detail for the first time using morphological and molecular data. Analysis of morphological characters resulted in multiple equally parsimonious trees. Bayesian analysis supported a monophyletic Scaritinae and within Scaritini, a basal position of subtribes Carenina and Pasimachina. Relationships of subtribe Scaritina were impossible to reconstruct due to a complex pattern of convergent evolution and character reversals. 18S rRNA gene sequences were aligned using ClustalX and by incorporating secondary structure information using MAFFT. Consistent results were obtained by Bayesian analysis of the MAFFT alignments, supporting the clades Scaritinae and Scaritini, Carenina and Scaritina. The Australian scaritines (Carenina) were found to be sister to all remaining Scaritini. An historical biogeographic reconstruction of the Scaritini was undertaken by incorporating evidence from extant distributions, fossils and the phylogenetic data. It is likely that evolution of the basal lineages of Scaritini occurred before the fragmentation of Gondwana and that the present-day distributions of the later radiation of Scaritina are due to dispersal. As with most groups of Carabidae, the lack of fossil evidence and molecular clock dating precludes any firm biogeographical conclusions. Acknowledgements It is no exaggeration to say this work would have been impossible without the help and tolerance of my family Rae, Maeve and Eddie. Steve Simpson, George McGavin and my supervisor Tim Shreeve have encouraged me from the very beginning. David Maddison and George Ball offered sound advice during the early stages and Petr Bulirsch shared his great knowledge of scaritine taxonomy. Special thanks must go to Darren Mann for help and advice on probably every aspect of this project and for gathering rare beetles from around the world. I also must thank my colleagues Zoë Simmons, Amoret Spooner and Katherine Child who were very supportive during the final stages of this work. For help with translation I am indebted to my family, John Hogan (French), Pat Frith (Italian) and Sophie Hayes (German). Alfried Vogler and John Day were very generous in providing facilities for DNA sequencing. Specimens for DNA work were graciously provided by Jose Galián, Mike Caterino, David Pryce, Daegan Inward and Dan Duran. Max Barclay, Christine Taylor and Beulah Garner kindly arranged loans of specimens from the Natural History Museum, London. This thesis is dedicated to Elaine Hogan, who above all others wished to see its completion. Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.1.1 Classification of the Scaritinae 4 1.1.2 Evolution of the Carabidae 12 1.1.3 Evolution of the Scaritinae 14 1.1.4 Reconstructing the evolutionary history of scaritines 20 1.1.5 Morphology and scaritine phylogeny 26 1.1.6 Molecular systematics and scaritine phylogeny 29 1.1.7 Biogeography of the Scaritini 32 1.2. Aims 36 2. Phylogeny of the Scaritinae inferred from morphological data 37 2.1 Characters and character states 37 2.2 Methods 39 2.2.1 Taxon sampling 39 2.2.2 Character definition and coding 43 2.2.2.1 Character definition 43 2.2.2.2 Character coding 49 2.2.2.3 Ordering of character states 49 2.2.2.4 Missing and inapplicable data 50 2.2.2.5 Convergent and parallel evolution 51 2.2.2.6 Convergent and parallel evolution in the Scaritini 53 2.2.2.7 Characters associated with flight 55 2.2.3 The morphological characters 61 2.2.3.1 Dorsal surface of the head 62 2.2.3.2 Mouthparts 70 2.2.3.3 Ventral surface of the head 80 2.2.3.4 Thorax 81 2.2.3.5 Legs 86 2.2.3.6 Elytra 90 2.2.3.7 Abdomen 96 2.2.4 Phylogenetic analysis 97 2.2.4.1 Maximum parsimony methods 98 2.2.4.2 Bayesian inference methods 101 2.3 Results 104 2.3.1 Results of the character scoring 104 2.3.2 Results of the parsimony analysis 107 2.3.3 Results of the character ordering 113 2.3.4 Results of the Bayesian analysis 114 2.3.5 Per-character statistics 117 2.3.6 Phylogenetic relationships 119 2.4 Discussion 131 2.4.1 Homoplasy and multiple equally parsimonious trees 131 2.4.2 Genera defined by labile characters 133 2.4.3 Ecological convergence 136 2.5 Conclusions and future directions 140 3. A study of the male genitalia of Scaritini 142 3.1 Introduction 142 3.1.1 Internal structure of the aedeagus 142 3.2 Method 144 3.3 Results 145 3.4 Conclusions 152 4. Phylogeny of the Scaritinae inferred from molecular data 154 4.1 Introduction 154 4.1.1 The small subunit 18S rRNA gene 154 4.1.2 Structure of the 18S rRNA molecule 155 4.1.3 Sequence alignment 157 4.1.3.1 Incorporating secondary structure information 159 4.1.3.2 The problem of ambiguous alignment 163 4.2 Methods 164 4.2.1 Taxon Sampling 164 4.2.2 DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing 168 4.2.2.1 DNA extraction 168 4.2.2.2 DNA Amplification 169 4.2.2.3 DNA Sequencing 170 4.2.2.4 DNA sequence editing 170 4.2.3 Analysis methods 170 4.2.3.1 The ‘multiple analysis’ method 170 4.2.3.2 Multiple sequence alignment 171 4.2.3.3 Data partitioning 173 4.2.3.4 Phylogenetic analysis 175 4.2.3.5 Phylogenetic analysis with PAUP* 175 4.2.3.6 Phylogenetic analysis with MrBayes 176 4.2.3.7 Gap coding 177 4.2.3.8 Construction of the combined consensus trees |178 4.3 Results 180 4.3.1 The sequence data 180 4.3.2 The alignments and parameters 180 4.3.3 The data partitions 188 4.3.3.1 Phylogenetic signal of the length-conserved regions 188 4.3.3.2 Phylogenetic signal of the length-variable regions 194 4.3.4 Phylogeny inferred from the full length 18S sequence 200 4.3.5 Reversible jump MCMC and substitution models 212 4.3.6 Phylogenetic relationships 212 4.3.6.1 The mid-grade Carabidae outgroups 212 4.3.6.2 Scaritine relationships 214 4.4 Discussion 219 4.4.1 The data partitions 219 4.4.2 Alignment methods 220 4.4.3 Phylogenetic methods 221 4.4.4 Relationships of the Scaritinae 222 4.5 Conclusions and future directions 224 5. Biogeography of the Scaritini 226 5.1 The present distribution of Scaritini 226 5.2 The fossil record of Carabidae and Scaritinae 230 5.3 Vicariance and the distribution of Scaritini 232 5.4 Biogeography of the basal subtribes of Scaritini: Carenina and Pasimachina 235 5.5 Dispersal and the distribution of Scaritina 239 5.6 Biogeography and taxonomy 243 5.7 Conclusions and future directions 244 6. Conclusions and directions for further work 246 6.1 Morphological versus molecular data 246 6.2 Evolution of the mid-grade Carabidae and Scaritinae 250 6.3 Classification of the Scaritinae 252 6.4 Biogeography 253 6.5 Concluding remarks 254 References 255 Appendix 288 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction. The family Carabidae, commonly known as ground beetles, is one of the larger families of Coleoptera, comprising about 35,000 species (Lorenz, 2005). The focus of this research is on the Scaritinae, a subfamily of the Carabidae comprising about 1850 species and 125 genera (Lorenz, 2005). Scaritinae are specialised for burrowing and are easily distinguished from other ground beetles both by their distinctive body shape and by their front legs modified for digging (figure 1.1). Scaritines occur in a wide variety of habitats, from lowland tropical forest to semi-desert and from ocean beaches to the tops of mountains. They are present on all continents except Antarctica and are most numerous in the tropics and warmer regions of the Southern Hemisphere. Some areas, such as Madagascar and Australia, have a large and diverse endemic fauna.
Recommended publications
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report
    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera Carabidae) in the Ramsar Wetland: Dayet El Ferd, Tlemcen, Algeria
    Biodiversity Journal , 2016, 7 (3): 301–310 Diversity of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera Carabidae) in the Ramsar wetland: Dayet El Ferd, Tlemcen, Algeria Redouane Matallah 1,* , Karima Abdellaoui-hassaine 1, Philippe Ponel 2 & Samira Boukli-hacene 1 1Laboratory of Valorisation of human actions for the protection of the environment and application in public health. University of Tlemcen, BP119 13000 Algeria 2IMBE, CNRS, IRD, Aix-Marseille University, France *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT A study on diversity of ground beetle communities (Coleoptera Carabidae) was conducted between March 2011 and February 2012 in the temporary pond: Dayet El Ferd (listed as a Ramsar site in 2004) located in a steppe area on the northwest of Algeria. The samples were collected bimonthly at 6 sampling plots and the gathered Carabidae were identified and coun - ted. A total of 55 species belonging to 32 genera of 7 subfamilies were identified from 2893 collected ground beetles. The most species rich subfamilies were Harpalinae (35 species, 64%) and Trechinae (14 species, 25.45%), others represented by one or two species. Accord- ing to the total individual numbers, Cicindelinae was the most abundant subfamily compris- ing 38.81% of the whole beetles, followed by 998 Harpalinae (34.49%), and 735 Trechinae (25.4%), respectively. The dominant species was Calomera lunulata (Fabricius, 1781) (1087 individuals, 37.57%) and the subdominant species was Pogonus chalceus viridanus (Dejean, 1828) (576 individuals, 19.91%). KEY WORDS Algeria; Carabidae; Diversity; Ramsar wetland “Dayet El Ferd”. Received 28.06.2016; accepted 31.07.2016; printed 30.09.2016 INTRODUCTION gards to vegetation and especially fauna, in partic- ular arthropods.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia County Ground Beetle Species (There May Be Some Dutchess County Floodplain Forest Records Still Included)
    Columbia County Ground Beetle Species (There may be some Dutchess County floodplain forest records still included). Anisodactylus nigerrimus Amara aenea Apristus latens Acupalpus canadensis Amara angustata Apristus subsulcatus Acupalpus partiarius Amara angustatoides Asaphidion curtum Acupalpus pauperculus Amara apricaria Badister neopulchellus Acupalpus pumilus Amara avida Badister notatus Acupalpus rectangulus Amara chalcea Badister ocularis Agonum aeruginosum Amara communis Badister transversus Agonum affine Amara crassispina Bembidion Agonum canadense Amara cupreolata Bembidion aenulum Agonum corvus Amara exarata Bembidion affine Agonum cupripenne Amara familiaris Bembidion antiquum Agonum errans Amara flebilis Bembidion basicorne Agonum extensicolle Amara lunicollis Bembidion carolinense Agonum ferreum Amara neoscotica Bembidion castor Agonum fidele Amara otiosa Bembidion chalceum Agonum galvestonicum Amara ovata Bembidion cheyennense Agonum gratiosum Amara pennsylvanica Bembidion frontale Agonum harrisii Amara rubrica Bembidion immaturum Agonum lutulentum Amara sp Bembidion impotens Agonum melanarium Amphasia interstitialis Bembidion inaequale Agonum metallescens Anatrichis minuta Bembidion incrematum Agonum moerens Anisodactylus discoideus Bembidion inequale Agonum muelleri Anisodactylus harrisii Bembidion lacunarium Agonum mutatum Anisodactylus kirbyi Bembidion levetei Agonum palustre Anisodactylus nigrita Bembidion louisella Agonum picicornoides Anisodactylus pseudagricola Bembidion mimus Agonum propinquum Anisodactylus rusticus
    [Show full text]
  • Descent of Man
    THE DESCENT OF MAN, AND SELECTION IN RELATION TO SEX, BY CHARLES DARWIN, M.A., F.R.S., &c. IN TWO VOLUMES.—VOL. II. WITH ILLUSTRATIONS. LONDON: JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET. 1871. [The right of Translation is reserved.] ERRATA. CONTENTS. PART II. SEXUAL SELECTION-continued. CHAPTER XII. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS OF FISHES, AMPHIBIANS, AND REPTILES. FISHES : Courtship and battles of the males — Larger size of the females — Males, bright colours and ornamental appendages; other strange characters — Colours and appendages acquired by the males during the breeding-season alone — Fishes with both sexes brilliantly coloured — Protective colours — The less con- spicuous colours of the female cannot be accounted for on the principle of protection — Male fishes building nests, and taking charge of the ova and young. AMPHIBIANS : Differences in structure and colour between the sexes — Vocal organs. REP- TILES : Chelonians — Crocodiles — Snakes, colours in some cases protective — Lizards, battles of — Ornamental appendages — Strange differences in structure between the sexes — Colours — Sexual differences almost as great as with birds .. Page 1-37 CHAPTER XIII. SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS OF BIRDS. Sexual differences — Law of battle — Special weapons — Vocal organs—Instrumental music — Love-antics and dances — Deco- rations, permanent and seasonal — Double and single annual moults—Display of ornaments by the males .. .. .. 38-98 vi CONTENTS OF VOL. II. CHAPTER XIV. BIRDS—continued. Choice exerted by the female — Length of courtship — Unpaired birds — Mental qualities and taste for the beautiful — Preference or antipathy shewn by the female for particular males — Vari- ability of birds — Variations sometimes abrupt—Laws of varia- tion — Formation of ocelli — Gradations of character — Case of Peacock, Argus pheasant, and Urosticte .
    [Show full text]
  • Manual De Identificação De Invertebrados Cavernícolas
    MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMIENTE INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DO MEIO AMBIENTE E DOS RECURSOS NATURAIS RENOVÁVEIS DIRETORIA DE ECOSSISTEMAS CENTRO NACIONAL DE ESTUDO, PROTEÇÃO E MANEJO DE CAVERNAS SCEN Av. L4 Norte, Ed Sede do CECAV, CEP.: 70818-900 Telefones: (61) 3316.1175/3316.1572 FAX.: (61) 3223.6750 Guia geral de identificação de invertebrados encontrados em cavernas no Brasil Produto 6 CONSULTOR: Franciane Jordão da Silva CONTRATO Nº 2006/000347 TERMO DE REFERÊNCIA Nº 119708 Novembro de 2007 MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMIENTE INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DO MEIO AMBIENTE E DOS RECURSOS NATURAIS RENOVÁVEIS DIRETORIA DE ECOSSISTEMAS CENTRO NACIONAL DE ESTUDO, PROTEÇÃO E MANEJO DE CAVERNAS SCEN Av. L4 Norte, Ed Sede do CECAV, CEP.: 70818-900 Telefones: (61) 3316.1175/3316.1572 FAX.: (61) 3223.6750 1. Apresentação O presente trabalho traz informações a respeito dos animais invertebrados, com destaque para aqueles que habitam o ambiente cavernícola. Sem qualquer pretensão de esgotar um assunto tão vasto, um dos objetivos principais deste guia básico de identificação é apresentar e caracterizar esse grande grupo taxonômico de maneira didática e objetiva. Este guia de identificação foi elaborado para auxiliar os técnicos e profissionais de várias áreas de conhecimento nos trabalhos de campo e nas vistorias técnicas realizadas pelo Ibama. É preciso esclarecer que este guia não pretende formar “especialista”, mesmo porque para tanto seriam necessários muitos anos de dedicação e aprendizado contínuo. Longe desse intuito, pretende- se apenas que este trabalho sirva para despertar o interesse quanto à conservação dos invertebrados de cavernas (meio hipógeo) e também daqueles que vivem no ambiente externo (meio epígeo).
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • From Characters of the Female Reproductive Tract
    Phylogeny and Classification of Caraboidea Mus. reg. Sci. nat. Torino, 1998: XX LCE. (1996, Firenze, Italy) 107-170 James K. LIEBHERR and Kipling W. WILL* Inferring phylogenetic relationships within Carabidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) from characters of the female reproductive tract ABSTRACT Characters of the female reproductive tract, ovipositor, and abdomen are analyzed using cladi­ stic parsimony for a comprehensive representation of carabid beetle tribes. The resulting cladogram is rooted at the family Trachypachidae. No characters of the female reproductive tract define the Carabidae as monophyletic. The Carabidac exhibit a fundamental dichotomy, with the isochaete tri­ bes Metriini and Paussini forming the adelphotaxon to the Anisochaeta, which includes Gehringiini and Rhysodini, along with the other groups considered member taxa in Jeannel's classification. Monophyly of Isochaeta is supported by the groundplan presence of a securiform helminthoid scle­ rite at the spermathecal base, and a rod-like, elongate laterotergite IX leading to the explosion cham­ ber of the pygidial defense glands. Monophyly of the Anisochaeta is supported by the derived divi­ sion of gonocoxa IX into a basal and apical portion. Within Anisochaeta, the evolution of a secon­ dary spermatheca-2, and loss ofthe primary spermathcca-I has occurred in one lineage including the Gehringiini, Notiokasiini, Elaphrini, Nebriini, Opisthiini, Notiophilini, and Omophronini. This evo­ lutionary replacement is demonstrated by the possession of both spermatheca-like structures in Gehringia olympica Darlington and Omophron variegatum (Olivier). The adelphotaxon to this sper­ matheca-2 clade comprises a basal rhysodine grade consisting of Clivinini, Promecognathini, Amarotypini, Apotomini, Melaenini, Cymbionotini, and Rhysodini. The Rhysodini and Clivinini both exhibit a highly modified laterotergite IX; long and thin, with or without a clavate lateral region.
    [Show full text]
  • New and Interesting <I>Laboulbeniales</I> From
    ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2014. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/129.439 Volume 129(2), pp. 439–454 October–December 2014 New and interesting Laboulbeniales from southern and southeastern Asia D. Haelewaters1* & S. Yaakop2 1Farlow Reference Library and Herbarium of Cryptogamic Botany, Harvard University 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, U.S.A. 2Faculty of Science & Technology, School of Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia * Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract — Two new species of Laboulbenia from the Philippines are described and illustrated: Laboulbenia erotylidarum on an erotylid beetle (Coleoptera, Erotylidae) and Laboulbenia poplitea on Craspedophorus sp. (Coleoptera, Carabidae). In addition, we present ten new records of Laboulbeniales from several countries in southern and southeastern Asia on coleopteran hosts. These are Blasticomyces lispini from Borneo (Indonesia), Cantharomyces orientalis from the Philippines, Dimeromyces rugosus on Leiochrodes sp. from Sumatra (Indonesia), Laboulbenia anoplogenii on Clivina sp. from India, L. cafii on Remus corallicola from Singapore, L. satanas from the Philippines, L. timurensis on Clivina inopaca from Papua New Guinea, Monoicomyces stenusae on Silusa sp. from the Philippines, Ormomyces clivinae on Clivina sp. from India, and Peyritschiella princeps on Philonthus tardus from Lombok (Indonesia). Key words — Ascomycota, insect-associated fungi, morphology, museum collection study, Roland Thaxter, taxonomy Introduction One group of microscopic insect-associated parasitic fungi, the order Laboulbeniales (Ascomycota, Pezizomycotina, Laboulbeniomycetes), is perhaps the most intriguing and yet least studied of all entomogenous fungi. Laboulbeniales are obligate parasites on invertebrate hosts, which include insects (mainly beetles and flies), millipedes, and mites.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2008) 255–269 www.elsevier.de/ode A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G. Beutela,Ã, Ignacio Riberab, Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emondsa aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, Germany bMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain Received 14 October 2005; accepted 17 May 2006 Abstract A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+ Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboulbeniomycetes, Eni... Historyâ
    Laboulbeniomycetes, Enigmatic Fungi With a Turbulent Taxonomic History☆ Danny Haelewaters, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States; Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Universidad Autónoma ̌ de Chiriquí, David, Panama; and University of South Bohemia, Ceské Budejovice,̌ Czech Republic Michał Gorczak, University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland Patricia Kaishian, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States and State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, United States André De Kesel, Meise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium Meredith Blackwell, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States and University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States r 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From Roland Thaxter to the Present: Synergy Among Mycologists, Entomologists, Parasitologists Laboulbeniales were discovered in the middle of the 19th century, rather late in mycological history (Anonymous, 1849; Rouget, 1850; Robin, 1852, 1853; Mayr, 1853). After their discovery and eventually their recognition as fungi, occasional reports increased species numbers and broadened host ranges and geographical distributions; however, it was not until the fundamental work of Thaxter (1896, 1908, 1924, 1926, 1931), who made numerous collections but also acquired infected insects from correspondents, that the Laboulbeniales became better known among mycologists and entomologists. Thaxter set the stage for progress by describing a remarkable number of taxa: 103 genera and 1260 species. Fewer than 25 species of Pyxidiophora in the Pyxidiophorales are known. Many have been collected rarely, often described from single collections and never encountered again. They probably are more common and diverse than known collections indicate, but their rapid development in hidden habitats and difficulty of cultivation make species of Pyxidiophora easily overlooked and, thus, underreported (Blackwell and Malloch, 1989a,b; Malloch and Blackwell, 1993; Jacobs et al., 2005; Gams and Arnold, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Grove Tabled Paper
    RESOURCES PROJECT NUMBER: PNC142-0809 OCTOBER 2012 Persistence of mature forest biodiversity elements in a production forest landscape managed under a Regional Forest Agreement This report can also be viewed on the FWPA website www.fwpa.com.au FWPA Level 4, 10-16 Queen Street, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia T +61 (0)3 9927 3200 F +61 (0)3 9927 3288 E [email protected] W www.fwpa.com.au Persistence of mature-forest biodiversity elements in a production-forest landscape managed under a Regional Forest Agreement Prepared for Forest & Wood Products Australia By Tim Wardlaw, Simon Grove, Jayne Balmer, Andrew Hingston, Lynette Forster, Christina Schmuki and Steve Read Publication: Persistence of mature forest biodiversity elements in a production forest landscape managed under a Regional Forest Agreement Project No: PNC142-0809 © 2012 Forest & Wood Products Australia Limited. All rights reserved. Forest & Wood Products Australia Limited (FWPA) makes no warranties or assurances with respect to this publication including merchantability, fitness for purpose or otherwise. FWPA and all persons associated with it exclude all liability (including liability for negligence) in relation to any opinion, advice or information contained in this publication or for any consequences arising from the use of such opinion, advice or information. This work is copyright and protected under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). All material except the FWPA logo may be reproduced in whole or in part, provided that it is not sold or used for commercial benefit and its source (Forest & Wood Products Australia Limited) is acknowledged. Reproduction or copying for other purposes, which is strictly reserved only for the owner or licensee of copyright under the Copyright Act, is prohibited without the prior written consent of Forest & Wood Products Australia Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]