Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften / Austrian Academy of Sciences AAS WORKING PAPERS IN SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY Volume 19 Najwa Adra TRIBAL MEDIATION IN YEMEN AND ITS IMPLICATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT Band 19 ÖAW ARBEITSPAPIERE ZUR SOZIALANTHROPOLOGIE AAS Working Papers in Social Anthropology / ÖAW Arbeitspapiere zur Sozialanthropologie ISSN: 1998–507X doi: 10.1553/wpsa19 ISBN: 978-3-7001-6944-4 Wien 2011 Editors / Herausgeber: Andre Gingrich & Guntram Hazod © Institut für Sozialanthropologie Zentrum Asienwissenschaften und Sozialanthropologie Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften Apostelgasse 23 A-1030 Wien Fax: 01/ 51581-6450 E-Mail:
[email protected] TRIBAL MEDIATION IN YEMEN AND ITS IMPLICATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT* NAJWA ADRA 1. Introduction An international phenomenon that has captured the interest of scholars and international development organizations is a continued tendency to resolve confl ict through indigenous methods rather than in state courts (Chirayath et al.; Corrin Care 2000; Syria-News.com; UNDP). In Yemen, as in countries as diverse as Kenya and the Solomon Islands, traditional justice is often perceived as familiar, transparent, and participatory. Its focus is reconciliation rather than punishment (Dempsey and Coburn 2010; Dimitrijevic 2006). Specifi cally in Yemen there is considerable fl exibility and adaptability in indigenous tribal procedures and decisions, more so than one usually fi nds in state justice systems, and decisions are restitutive rather than coercive. Furthermore, indigenous dispute mediation, where fi nes are shared by the entire community, is less costly than the formal legal system. On the other hand, there are concerns that traditional justice may perpetuate social hierarchies by favoring the powerful or discriminating against women (Corrin Care 2000; Kameri-Mbote 2005; Kollapen 2005; Tripp n.d.).