DOCSLIB.ORG

Emergency Plan of Action Operation Update Bangladesh: Population Movement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Emergency Plan of Action Operation Update Bangladesh: Population Movement Emergency Appeal n° MDRBD018 GLIDE n° OT-2017-000003-BGD EPoA update n° 8 Timeframe covered by this update: Date of issue: 9 July 2019 17 January 2017 to 31 May 2019 Operation timeframe: 39 months; end date 30 June 2020 Operation start date: 28 December 2016 (Emergency Appeal launched on 18 March 2017) DREF amount initially allocated: Total amount advanced Overall operation budget: CHF 51 million (revised); and replenished from DREF is CHF 1,063,858 - January Appeal coverage: 83 per cent (donor response). 2017: CHF 273,151; September 2017: CHF 690,707 and June 2018: CHF 100,000. No. of people being assisted: Approximately 200,000 displaced people and 60,000 from host communities Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners currently actively involved in the operation: Movement partners are supporting the Bangladesh Red Crescent Society (BDRCS) response through the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) Emergency Appeal, on bilateral arrangements with BDRCS, utilizing a One-Window Approach1 or through the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) appeal. Partners who have contributed to the IFRC Emergency Appeal are: American Red Cross, Australian Red Cross, Austrian Red Cross, Bahrain Red Crescent, Belgian Red Cross, British Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross, Red Cross Society of China Macau branch, Danish Red Cross, Finnish Red Cross, Hong Kong branch of the Red Cross Society of China, the Iranian Red Crescent, Italian Red Cross, Japanese Red Cross Society, Luxembourg Red Cross, Maldivian Red Crescent, Netherlands Red Cross, New Zealand Red Cross, Norwegian Red Cross, Red Cross of Monaco, Republic of Korea National Red Cross, Singapore Red Cross, Spanish Red Cross, Swedish Red Cross, Swiss Red Cross, Taiwan Red Cross Organization and Turkish Red Crescent. The German Red Cross, Italian Red Cross, the Iranian Red Crescent, Swiss Red Cross, Qatar Red Crescent and the United Arab Emirates Red Crescent contributed to the BDRCS activities through bilateral channels. Other partners contributing to this operation: The Governments of Australia, Austria, United Kingdom, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the Philippines, Sweden, Switzerland, the United States and Uzbekistan, and private donors from Malaysia and the Maldives have contributed financially to the operation. The Islamic Development Bank has also contributed financially to this Appeal. Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: The Government of Bangladesh, UN agencies, INGOs and local NGOs are involved. Specifically, the actors include WHO, WFP, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, IOM, ACF, Solidarity International (SI), Médecins Sans Frontièrs (MSF), Handicap International (HI), NGO Forum (NGOF), Save the Children, and local NGOs such as Codec, BRAC, MUKTI, BGS, SHED and RTMI. The Bangladesh Population Movement (PMO) Emergency Appeal and Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) fifth revision was published on 1 May 2019. The revised Emergency Appeal seeks an increased budget of CHF 51 million and a timeframe extension up to 30 June 2020. The extended operation will focus on four integrated approaches: 1. Continuing humanitarian assistance. 2. Enhancing preparedness for response. 3. Strengthening community resilience. 4. Fostering social cohesion. 1 One-window approach has been designed with flexibility to accommodate more partners’ contributions to the response through a common agreed plan and is regarded as the most acceptable, effective and efficient approach for this response. Continuing essential humanitarian assistance will include delivery of shelter; health; water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH); protection, gender and inclusion (PGI) services, with a target of 200,000 displaced people from Rakhine State and 60,000 people from host communities. The revised plan of action also addresses key cross cutting issues, including protection and community engagement and accountability. This update informs on the activities accomplished up to 31 May 2019 for the PMO according to the current needs and context of the crisis. A. SITUATION ANALYSIS Description of the disaster Since 25 August 2017, extreme violence in Rakhine State, Myanmar, drove over 727,000 people from Rakhine State across the border into Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Communities have crossed the border before, and Bangladesh has been hosting people from Rakhine since the 1970s. However, the influx in August 2017 has been the largest and fastest in its history. The situation of statelessness imposed over generations has rendered this population seriously vulnerable, even before the severe traumas of this most recent displacement. The number of people from Rakhine inside Bangladesh remains fluid as there is still a flow of population coming from Myanmar and other regional countries. Over 919,000 displaced people are still living in makeshift camps and other sites. The largest camp (Mega Camp) is the Kutupalong expansion site in Ukhia, hosting more than 610,000 refugees. The situation is also a protection crisis in that the protection needs for the displaced community are very high due to the extreme and systematic violence experienced. About 55 per cent of displaced people from Rakhine state are under 18 years of age. Over 30 per cent of households are classified as vulnerable due to the presence of disabilities, single parents, separated children, or older people. Women and girls account for 52 per cent of the population. The community from Rakhine continues to rely heavily on aid for securing their basic needs. Growing tension between the guest and the host community has been reported. The surrounding host communities have been also been heavily impacted by the scale and length of the crisis. The total population from Rakhine quadrupled within two months after the August influx (August to October 2017) which has severely impacted the public infrastructure and services in the area. At least 15,000 people from the displaced communities live with host communities, the majority in Sadar and Ramu in Cox's Bazar and in Teknaf. Considering the challenges faced by host communities, their needs, and also with the view of the protracted nature of the crisis, this operation aims to also provide assistance and support to the population living in surrounding areas of camps. The situation remains severe as the displaced population are facing additional threats. They live Camp Population (Source: JRP 2019) in congested sites that impact all aspects of living and are ill-equipped to handle the monsoon rains and cyclone seasons – with alarmingly limited options for evacuation. Many displaced have also expressed anxiety about their future, explaining that while they wish to return, they would not agree to do so until questions of citizenship, legal rights, and access to services, justice and restitution are addressed. In November 2018, the governments of Bangladesh and Myanmar announced that the repatriation process would start on 15 November 2018. As of April 2019, no repatriations back to Myanmar have taken place due to conditions not being conducive for return and no concrete evidence that any members of the displaced community are ready to return. UNHCR has repeatedly stated that conditions in Myanmar are not conducive for any returns and that they will not be able to facilitate the process at this time. However, the proposed repatriation process has caused unease and distress in the camps. Furthermore, in the month of November 2018, there were several strikes with demonstrations in the camp from community members rejecting the attempts for repatriation and presenting the following demands: (1) ensure durable solutions to end the refugee situation; (2) ensure quality education with a standard curriculum; (3) do not change any registration documents; (4) ensure proper treatment; (5) ensure proper safeguarding. Considering the uncertainty of how the situation will evolve, there are four different scenarios that has been taken into account in updating the operational strategy: 1. Relocation of a part of the affected population to an island - at least 100,000 people might be relocated. 2. Repatriation to Myanmar - this is less likely despite the political statements. 3. Mega camps continuation - this is the current situation and highly probable. 4. Resettlements in other countries - if it happens, only a small number of people might be affected. Summary of current response Overview of Host National Society Due to the crisis, the BDRCS has scaled up their assistance to support the operation since December 2016. On 29 December 2016, the Government of Bangladesh (GoB) requested the support of BDRCS to provide humanitarian assistance in Cox’s Bazar. This support was agreed by BDRCS after rapid assessments validated the humanitarian needs. The Cox’s Bazar Unit of BDRCS along with the Red Cross youth volunteers have been the backbone of the operation from the beginning and have been supporting the operation across all sectors of operation. The BDRCS National Headquarters (NHQ) has been supporting the operation by deploying staff and resources to ensure the smoothness of the operation. Furthermore, to address the immediate needs of the People from Rakhine, support is also received from the Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners through the multilateral and bilateral interventions. The response has received support of local donors, IFRC (via Emergency Appeal MDRBD018 to which various partners have contributed), ICRC and
Recommended publications
  • Volunteering in Emergencies: Practical Guidelines for Red Cross

    Volunteering in Emergencies: Practical Guidelines for Red Cross

    Volunteering in emergencies Practical guidelines for Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies managing volunteers in emergency situations How we work Strategy 2020 voices the collective determination of the IFRC to move forward in tackling the major challenges that confront humanity in the next decade. Informed by the needs and vulnerabilities of the diverse communities with whom we work, as well as the basic rights and freedoms to which all are entitled, this strategy seeks to benefit all who look to Red Cross Red Crescent to help to build a more humane, dignified, and peaceful world. Over the next ten years, the collective focus of the IFRC will be on achieving the following strategic aims: 1. Save lives, protect livelihoods, and strengthen recovery from disasters and crises 2. Enable healthy and safe living 3. Promote social inclusion and a culture of non-violence and peace © International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva, 2012 Any part of this publication may be cited, copied, translated into other languages or adapted to meet local needs without prior permission from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, provided that the source is clearly stated. Requests for commercial reproduction should be directed to the IFRC at [email protected] All photos used in this study are copyright of the IFRC unless otherwise indicated. Cover photo: IFRC During the Myanmar Cyclone Nargis, the winds and the tide lifted up the family’s boat and smashed it into their house, which collapsed. Myanmar Red Cross volunteer and community-based first aid trainer Nyi Nyi Zaw and his family jumped on board the boat, which then P.O.
  • Best Practices Turkish Red Crescent 2021

    Best Practices Turkish Red Crescent 2021

    TURKISH RED CRESCENT MIGRATION SERVICES DIRECTORATE BEST PRACTICES 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Foreword…………………………….............................................................……..3 II. Emergency Social Safety Net (ESSN) – KIZILAYKART.………......……4 III. Community Based Migration Programmes……………….…………….. 10 IV. Child Programmes…………………............................................................ 16 2 I. Foreword More than a century and a half of history, the Turkish Red Crescent (TRC) has been fighting against the global diseases, effects of war, natural disasters, earthquakes, famine, and poverty whilst representing mercy and compassion all over the world. One of the primary objectives of Turkish Red Crescent is to empower individuals, and thus the society to alleviate the human suffering caused by diseases, disasters and poverty. The Turkish Red Crescent is the largest humanitarian organization in Turkey with 541 branches and over 11000 staff countrywide. Turkish Red Crescent is the sole host and operational Movement actor in the country, and works closely with the relevant Turkish government ministries, local authorities, disaster response, and migration management agencies in line with its assigned mandate and duties. Due to the continuing conflict in Syria, Turkey remains host to some 5 million refugees within its borders, including nationals from Syria, Somalia, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan – making it the country with the largest refugee population in the world. Given the protracted nature of the crisis, interventions seek to
  • MRC Activities Update

    MRC Activities Update

    ANNUAL REPORT From 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2010 Issued: 16 April 2011 MRC ANNUAL REPORT 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Page 3 RECOGNITION BY ICRC AND IFRC MEMBERSHIP -----------------------------------Page 3 GOVERNANCE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------Page 3 SECOND GENERAL ASSEMBLY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Page 3 STATUTORY BODIES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Page 3 MANAGEMENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4 STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR MRC ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4 HUMAN RESOURCES AND CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT ---------------------------------------------- Page 4 FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 COMMUNICATIONS--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 RESOURCE MOBILIZATION------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 MEMBERSHIP AND VOLUNTEERS----------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 EXTERNAL RELATIONS AND PARTNERSHIPS---------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 BRANCH DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRAMMES------------------------------------------------------- Page 11
  • Movement Flood Response Fact Sheet No. 17

    Movement Flood Response Fact Sheet No. 17

    Movement flood response Fact sheet no. 17 28 March 2011 The following factsheet provides an overview of the assistance provided to flood-affected people up to 17 March by the Pakistan Red Crescent Society (PRCS) with the support of its Red Cross Red Crescent Movement (Movement) partners. The information presented is based on the reports shared by all partners and is compiled to present the overall achievements according to each sector. Highlights As of 17 March: · 2,830,275 people have received food and non-food items through relief distributions. · 219,739 people have been reached with health services and psychosocial support. · 704,803 have benefited from water and sanitation services. · Winterized transitional shelter distribution in KPK, as part of early recovery, reaching 63,021 people. · The Movement continues early recovery interventions. 421,260 people received agricultural assistance material in KPK, Sindh and Balochistan. Relief · The Red Cross Red Crescent Movement has reached 2,454,550 people with food and 1,649,109 people with non-food items, reaching its initial targets. · In FATA and KPK, the Movement has completed relief distributions. Based on further needs transitioning into recovery, more food distribution is planned for Balochistan, KPK, Gilgit Baltistan, AJK, Punjab and Sindh, with 375,725 people already reached. The following graph gives an overview of people reached so far with food distributions: Shelter · 358,465 tarpaulins, 25,483 tents and 66,882 shelter kits have been distributed under the non- food items relief distribution. This will cater for emergency shelter needs of the flood-affected people. · The Movement’s winterized shelter distribution is nearly completed in KPK.
  • Addresses of National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies

    Addresses of National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies

    ADDRESSES OF NATIONAL RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES AFGHANISTAN — Afghan Red Crescent Society, Puli COLOMBIA — Colombian Red Cross Society, Hartan, Kabul. Avenida 68, No. 66-31, Apartado Aereo 11-10, ALBANIA — Albanian Red Cross, Rue Qamil Bogotd D.E. Guranjaku No. 2, Tirana. CONGO — Congolese Red Cross, place de la Paix, ALGERIA (People's Democratic Republic of) — B.P. 4145, Brazzaville. Algerian Red Crescent, 15 bis, boulevard COSTA RICA — Costa Rica Red Cross, Calle 14, Mohamed W.Algiers. Avenida 8, Apartado 1025, San Jost. ANGOLA — Angola Red Cross, Av. Hoji Ya COTE D'lVOKE — Red Cross Society of Cote Henda 107,2. andar, Luanda. dlvoire, B.P. 1244, Abidjan. ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA — The Antigua and CUBA — Cuban Red Cross, Calle Prado 206, Coldn y Barbuda Red Cross Society, P.O. Box 727, St. Johns. Trocadero, Habana 1. ARGENTINA — The Argentine Red Cross, H. DENMARK — Danish Red Cross, 27 Blegdamsvej, Yrigoyen 2068, 7089 Buenos Aires. Postboks 2600,2100 Ktbenhavn 0. AUSTRALIA — Australian Red Cross Society, 206, DJIBOUTI — Red Crescent Society of Djibouti, Clarendon Street, East Melbourne 3002. B.P. 8, Djibouti. AUSTRIA — Austrian Red Cross, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 32, Postfach 39,1041, Vienna 4. DOMINICA — Dominica Red Cross Society, P.O. Box 59, Roseau. BAHAMAS — The Bahamas Red Cross Society, P.O. BoxN-8331,/Vajjau. DOMINICAN REPUBLIC — Dominican Red Cross, Apartado postal 1293, Santo Domingo. BAHRAIN — Bahrain Red Crescent Society, P.O. Box 882, Manama. ECUADOR — Ecuadorean Red Cross, Av. Colombia y Elizalde Esq., Quito. BANGLADESH — Bangladesh Red Crescent Society, 684-686, Bara Magh Bazar, G.P.O. Box No. 579, EGYPT — Egyptian Red Crescent Society, 29, El Galaa Dhaka.
  • Action by Red Cross and Red Crescent National Societies To

    Action by Red Cross and Red Crescent National Societies To

    Action by Red Cross and Red Crescent National Societies to prevent and respond to child marriage Case Study Report The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) is the world’s largest volunteer-based humanitarian network. With our 190-member National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies worldwide, we are in every community reaching 160.7 million people annually through long-term services and development programmes, as well as 110 million people through disaster response and early recovery programmes. We act before, during and after disasters and health emergencies to meet the needs and improve the lives of vulnerable people. We do so with impartiality as to nationality, race, gender, religious beliefs, class and political opinions. Guided by Strategy 2020 – our collective plan of action to tackle the major humanitarian and development challenges of this decade – we are committed to saving lives and changing minds. Our strength lies in our volunteer network, our community-based expertise and our independence and neutrality. We work to improve humanitarian standards, as partners in development, and in response to disasters. We persuade decision-makers to act at all times in the interests of vulnerable people. The result: we enable healthy and safe communities, reduce vulnerabilities, strengthen resilience and foster a culture of peace around the world. © International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva, 2019 Any part of this publication may be cited, copied, translated into other languages or adapted to meet local needs without prior permission from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, provided that the source is clearly stated.
  • International Review of the Red Cross, May-June 1989, Twenty

    International Review of the Red Cross, May-June 1989, Twenty

    MAY - JUNE 1989 "TWENTY-NINTH YEAR No. 270 INTERNATIONAL • OF THE RED CROSS JAG CHOOl SEP 0 c 19'0; LIBRARY +c Published every twO months by the International Commiltee of the Red Cross for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement " +, INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS Mr. CORNELIO SOMMARUGA, Doctor of Laws of Zurich University, Doctor h.c. rer. pol. of Fribourg University (Switzerland), President (member since 1986) Mrs. DENISE BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, Doctor of Laws, Honorary Professor at the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, Judge at the European Court of Human Rights, Vice-President (1967) Mr. MAURICE AUBERT, Doctor of Laws, Vice-President (1979) Mr. ULRICH MIDDENDORP, Doctor of Medicine, head of surgical department of the Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur (1973) Mr. ALEXANDRE HAY, Honorary doctorates from the Universities of Geneva and St. Gallen, Lawyer, former Vice-President of the Governing Board of the Swiss National Bank, President from 1976 to 1987 (1975) Mr. ATHOS GALLINO, Doctor h.c. of Zurich University, Doctor of Medicine, former mayor of Bellinzona (1977) Mr. ROBERT KOHLER, Master of Economics (1977) Mr. RUDOLF JACKLI, Doctor of Sciences (1979) Mr. DIETRICH SCHINDLER, Doctor of Laws, Professor at the University of Zurich (1961-1973) (1980) Mr. HANS HAUG, Doctor of Laws, Honorary Professor at the University of St. Gallen for Business Administration, Economics, Law and Social Sciences, former President of the Swiss Red Cross (1983) Mr. PIERRE KELLER, Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations (Yale), Banker (1984) Mr. RAYMOND R. PROBST, Doctor of Laws, former Swiss Ambassador, former Secretary of State at the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Berne (1984) Mr.
  • The Red Cross Approach to Resilience

    The Red Cross Approach to Resilience

    Fact Sheet The Red Cross Approach to Resilience REF. RCEU 04/2014 – 004 02 April 2014 This are the recommendations of the National Red Cross Societies of the Member Resilience States of the European Union and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC)(1) Since its creation, the Red Cross has been guided by a clear set of humanitarian principles and values that aims, in one way or another, to effectively contribute to building resilience. IFRC’s Strategy 2020 asserts that our specific contribution to sustainable development is through Our Principles strengthening community resilience. We are guided at all times by our Fundamental Principles: To meet these ambitions the Red Cross is developing guidelines and trainings for the formulation Humanity and implementation of community resilience projects. Impartiality The Red Cross has a unique auxiliary role to the Public Authorities. It is composed by a vast net Neutrality of grass root volunteers integrated in their communities. Its universal presence and its neutrality Independence provide them a unique capacity to work in fragile contexts. For all these reasons, the Red Cross has Voluntary Services a comparative advantage to support community resilience in Fragile States. The guidelines and Unity trainings under development are taking this advantage into consideration. Universality A Broad Definition The Red Cross defines resilience as: the ability of individuals, communities, organizations, or coun- tries exposed to disasters and crises and underlying vulnerabilities to anticipate, reduce the impact of, cope with and recover from the effects of adversity without compromising their long term pros- pects. Resilience is not just the immediate ability to respond to negative events but rather a process of positive adaptation before, during and after adversity.
  • Movement Flood Response Fact Sheet No. 15

    Movement Flood Response Fact Sheet No. 15

    Movement flood response Fact sheet no. 15 4 February 2011 The following factsheet provides an overview of the assistance provided to flood-affected people up to 2 February by the Pakistan Red Crescent Society (PRCS) with the support of its Red Cross Red Crescent Movement (Movement) partners. The information presented is based on the reports shared by all partners and is compiled to present the overall achievements according to each sector. Highlights As of 2 February: 2,589,608 people have received food and non-food items through relief distributions. 195,172 people have been reached with health services and psychosocial support. 670,742 people have benefited from water and sanitation services. Winterized transitional shelter distribution in KPK, as part of early recovery, reaching 56,868 people. The Movement continues early recovery interventions. 421,260 people received agricultural assistance material in KPK, Sindh and Balochistan. Relief The Red Cross Red Crescent Movement has reached 2,397,465 people with food and 1,552,068 people with non-food items, reaching its initial targets. In FATA and KPK, the Movement has completed relief distributions. Based on further needs transitioning into recovery, more food distribution is planned for Balochistan, KPK, Gilgit Baltistan, AJK, Punjab and Sindh, with 192,143 people already reached. The following graph gives an overview of people reached so far with food distributions: Shelter 358,465 tarpaulins, 25,483 tents and 66,882 shelter kits have been distributed under the non- food items relief distribution. This will cater for emergency shelter needs of the flood-affected people. The Movement’s winterized shelter distribution is nearly completed in KPK.
  • Donor Response Refreshed on 02-Oct-2021 at 08:16

    Donor Response Refreshed on 02-Oct-2021 at 08:16

    Page 1 of 2 Selected Parameters Appeal Code MDRBD018 Year / Range 1900-2100 Donor response Refreshed on 02-Oct-2021 at 08:16 MDRBD018 - Bangladesh - Population Movement FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: 82,200,000 APPEAL LAUNCH DATE: 18-Mar-2017 RECEIVED TO DATE: 66,027,591 APPEAL COVERAGE TO DATE: 80% TIMEFRAME: 13-Jan-2017 to 31-Dec-2021 LOCATION: Bangladesh Bilateral Cash Inkind Goods Inkind Other Income Contributions Total contributions & Transport Personnel * CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF FUNDING REQUIREMENTS 82,200,000 FUNDING Opening Balance Income American Red Cross 179,521 73,250 13,940 266,711 Australian Red Cross 826,382 361,650 1,188,032 Australian Red Cross (from Australian Government*) 1,194,930 1,194,930 Australian Red Cross (from Swedish Red Cross*) 24,644 24,644 Austrian Red Cross (from Austrian Government*) 399,617 399,617 Bahrain Red Crescent Society 88,672 88,672 Belgian Red Cross (Flanders) 51,780 51,780 Belgian Red Cross (Francophone) 51,780 51,780 British Red Cross 2,443,596 288,785 154,847 644,234 3,531,463 British Red Cross (from British Government*) 2,565,312 890 2,566,202 British Red Cross (from DEC (Disasters Emergency 269,459 269,459 Committee)*) China Red Cross, Hong Kong branch 169,712 131,521 301,232 China Red Cross, Macau Branch 250 250 Danish Red Cross 82,000 82,000 Danish Red Cross (from Danish Government*) 147,500 147,500 European Commission - DG ECHO 165,896 165,896 Finnish Red Cross 1,486,573 1,486,573 Finnish Red Cross (from Finnish Government*) 120,678 120,678 German Red Cross 23,908 23,908 IFRC at the UN Inc 977
  • Emergency Appeal Operations Update Regional Coordination: Food Crisis in Africa

    Emergency Appeal Operations Update Regional Coordination: Food Crisis in Africa

    Emergency appeal operations update Regional Coordination: Food Crisis in Africa Emergency appeal n° MDR60003 Operations update n° 1 covered by this update: 19 April to 12 May 2017 Emergency Appeal start date:19 April 2017 Timeframe: 18 months Appeal budget: Appeal coverage: N° of people being assisted: 1,600,691 CHF 3,877,335 13% (in-kind) Host National Society presence: This regional appeal focuses on immediate regional support to those countries with existing country level appeals and responses. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the country-level operations: American Red Cross, Austrian Red Cross, Belgian Red Cross, British Red Cross, Danish Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross, Finnish Red Cross, German Red Cross, Icelandic Red Cross, Iran Red Crescent Society, Luxembourg Red Cross, Swiss Red Cross, Spanish Red Cross, Netherlands Red Cross, Norwegian Red Cross, and ICRC. Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: In many of the countries under the umbrella of the Regional Coordination Food Crisis in Africa Emergency Appeal, the IFRC have ongoing programs with the following: World Food Program (WFP) operates in Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Puntland and Zimbabwe in the areas of Livelihoods and Food Security and in Water Sanitation and Hygiene. Care International is partnering in Mozambique, Somalia (Somaliland), and Zimbabwe in the areas of Livelihoods and Food Security and Water, Sanitation and Hygiene. UNICEF is present in Kenya, Malawi and Somalia (Puntland) supporting Water, Sanitation and Hygiene programs. Others – partners such as Norwegian refugee Council, FAO, Save the children, Oxfam, IRC, Caritas are also partnering with National Societies in the region.
  • Red Cross Red Crescent Quiet Killer Issue 2

    Red Cross Red Crescent Quiet Killer Issue 2

    Lessons of war How the Syrian Arab Red Crescent rose to the challenges of civil war We need to talk about volunteering A new study questions the strength and reach of our volunteer network Red Cross Red Crescent Quiet killer Issue 2 . 2014 www.redcross.int Once on the decline, dengue fever has made a deadly comeback When the International Prisoners-of-War Agency was established by the ICRC 100 years ago this August, its objective was to trace people who had been separated from loved ones during the First World War. It was a huge task: during and after the war, agency volunteers processed tracing requests concerning nearly 2.5 million prisoners of war. With no form of mechanized data management then available, all requests were analysed, sorted, typed on index cards and filed for future use. For more, see our list of links at www.redcross.int. Lost in migration THE MAGAZINE OF THE INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT MOVEMENT Editorial The International Red Cross and A new chapter in Movement’s family links story retired air commodore with the years later, during the First World War, Indian armed forces, J.L. Bhargava the practice took on greater proportions, Red Crescent Movement is made up of the remembers his first encounter when some 7 million POWs were detained withA the Red Cross Red Crescent Move- and more than 20 million people were dis- ment. It was during the 1971 India–Paki- placed. The International Prisoners-of-War International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the stan war, when an ICRC delegate brought Agency, set up by the ICRC 100 years ago letters to the prisoner-of-war (POW) this August, ultimately delivered more camp where Bhargava was detained.