DOCSLIB.ORG

International Maritime Security Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Maritime Security Law International Maritime Security Law International Maritime Security Law By James Kraska and Raul Pedrozo LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kraska, James. International maritime security law / by James Kraska and Raul Pedrozo. pages cm Includes index. ISBN 978-90-04-23356-0 (hardback : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-90-04-23357-7 (e-book) 1. Freedom of the seas. 2. Law of the sea. 3. Security, International. 4. Maritime terrorism— Prevention—Law and legislation. 5. Merchant marine—Security measures. I. Pedrozo, Raul A. II. Title. KZA1348.K73 2013 341.4’5—dc23 2012049101 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. ISBN 978-90-04-23356-0 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-23357-7 (e-book) Copyright 2013 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Global Oriental, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers and Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper. CONTENTS List of Tables .................................................................................................................... xxiii List of Annexes and Appendices ................................................................................ xxv Chapter One Introduction to Maritime Security Law ..................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 What is “Maritime Security Law”? ............................................................. 5 1.2.1 The Protean Nature of Maritime Security Law ........................ 7 1.2.2 The Influence of Law on Sea Power ............................................ 11 1.2.3 Influence of Law on Maritime Security ..................................... 12 1.3 Building a Public Order of the Oceans ..................................................... 15 1.3.1 From Westphalia to Montego Bay ............................................... 16 1.3.2 Building a Global Maritime Partnership .................................... 19 1.4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 23 Chapter Two American Maritime Security Policy and Strategy ................... 25 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 25 2.2 U.S. Maritime Security Policy ...................................................................... 27 2.3 National Strategy for Maritime Security .................................................. 30 2.4 National Strategy for Global Supply Chain Security ............................ 33 2.5 U.S. Maritime Strategy for Homeland Security ...................................... 35 2.6 Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Sea Power ................................. 36 2.6.1 Naval Operations Concept ............................................................. 38 2.6.2 Expeditionary Sea Power ................................................................ 40 2.6.3 Pivot to Asia and the Air-Sea Battle Concept .......................... 42 Chapter Three European Maritime Strategy and Policy ................................. 47 3.1 North Atlantic Treaty Organization .......................................................... 47 3.1.1 NATO Alliance Maritime Strategy ............................................... 49 3.1.1.1 Collective Defense .............................................................. 50 vi contents 3.1.1.2 Crisis Management ......................................................... 50 3.1.1.3 Cooperative Security ...................................................... 51 3.1.1.4 Maritime Security Operations ..................................... 52 a. Nato Maritime Organization .................................. 53 b. Operation Active Endeavor .................................... 54 c. Ocean Shield: Counter-piracy ................................. 55 3.1.1.5 Promotion of International Law ................................. 57 3.2 European Union .............................................................................................. 58 3.2.1 Blue Book—Integrated Maritime Policy .................................... 62 3.2.1.1 Maritime Surveillance .................................................... 62 3.2.1.2 Naval Capabilities ............................................................ 64 3.2.1.3 Anti-piracy Operations .................................................. 64 3.2.1.4 A Security Strategy for the Global Maritime Domain ............................................................................... 66 3.3 Chiefs of European Navies Maritime Operational Concept .............. 66 3.4 U.K. Future Maritime Operational Concept ........................................... 70 Chapter Four Peacetime Zones and Control Measures .................................. 75 4.1 Temporary Suspension of Innocent Passage .......................................... 75 4.2 Offshore Installation Safety Zones ............................................................. 76 4.2.1 IMO Safety Zones .............................................................................. 78 4.2.2 U.S. Safety Zones ............................................................................... 82 4.2.3 U.K. Safety Zones ............................................................................... 84 4.3 World-Wide Navigational Warning Service ............................................ 85 4.3.1 U.S. Navigational Warnings ............................................................ 88 4.3.1.1 HYDROPAC: Strait of Hormuz—Iranian Naval Exercises ............................................................................. 88 4.3.1.2 HYDROLANT: Mediterranean Sea—Hazardous Operations ......................................................................... 89 4.3.1.3 Special Warning: Cuba ................................................... 90 4.3.1.4 Special Warning: Papua New Guinea—Political Unrest .................................................................................. 90 4.3.1.5 Special Warning: Morocco—Aggressive Maritime Enforcement ...................................................................... 91 4.3.1.6 Special Warning: Persian Gulf—UN Security Council Enforcement Action ....................................... 91 4.3.1.7 Special Warning: Sri Lanka—Combating Terrorist Threats ................................................................................ 92 4.3.1.8 Special Warning: Yemen—Threats to U.S. Citizens 93 4.3.1.9 Special Warning: Iran—Danger to Shipping .......... 93 4.3.1.10 Special Warning: Sierra Leone—Dangerous Port ... 94 4.3.1.11 Special Warning: United States—Worldwide Defensive Measures ........................................................ 94 contents vii 4.3.1.12 Special Warning: Persian Gulf—Military Operations .......................................................................... 95 4.3.1.13 Special Warning: East Africa—Terrorist Threat .... 96 4.3.1.14 Special Warning: Yemen—Terrorist Threat ............ 96 4.3.1.15 Special Warning: Somalia—Piracy ............................ 97 4.3.2 U.S. Maritime Administration Advisories .................................. 97 4.3.2.1 Reporting Terrorist Incidents ...................................... 98 4.3.2.2 Regional Terrorist and Piracy Threat ........................ 98 4.3.2.3 Vessels Transiting High Risk Waters (HRW)— Maritime Piracy ................................................................ 99 4.3.2.4 Japan Tsunami Radiological Threat and Debris Field ..................................................................................... 102 4.4 Aeronautical Information Services ............................................................ 103 4.4.1 ICAO Aeronautical Information Service .................................... 103 4.4.2 U.S. Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) .................................................. 105 Chapter Five Marine Environmental Protection and Control Measures ... 113 5.1 The Marine Environment ............................................................................. 113 5.1.1 Evolution of Marine Environmental Law .................................. 113 5.1.2 Framework Agreements to Protect the Marine Environment ....................................................................................... 116 5.2 Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas ................................................................. 117 5.2.1 Western Europe PSSA and the 2005 Guidelines ..................... 121 5.2.2 Malpelo Island PSSA (Colombia)—Regulation without Protection ............................................................................................ 126 5.2.3 Baltic Sea Area PSSA—Regulation without Concurrence .... 130 5.2.4 Papahānaumokuākea
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2014 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy
    AIRCRAFT CARRIER DDG 1000 AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) THE U.S. NAvy’s next-GENERATION MULTI-MISSION DESTROYER Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN Tarawa Class LHA Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 USS Peleliu LHA-5 John F. Kennedy CVN-79 Enterprise CVN-80 Nimitz Class CVN Wasp Class LHD USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S. Truman CVN-75 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C. Stennis CVN-74 USS George H.W. Bush CVN-77 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 SUBMARINE Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) America Class LHA America LHA-6 SURFACE COMBATANT Los Angeles Class SSN Tripoli LHA-7 USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Pittsburgh SSN-720 USS Albany SSN-753 USS Santa Fe SSN-763 Guided Missile Cruiser USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Chicago SSN-721 USS Topeka SSN-754 USS Boise SSN-764 USS Dallas SSN-700 USS Key West SSN-722 USS Scranton SSN-756 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS La Jolla SSN-701 USS Oklahoma City SSN-723 USS Alexandria SSN-757 USS Charlotte SSN-766 Ticonderoga Class CG USS City of Corpus Christi SSN-705 USS Louisville SSN-724 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Albuquerque SSN-706 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Hartford SSN-768 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Princeton CG-59 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Lake Erie CG-70 USS San Francisco SSN-711 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Toledo SSN-769 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Normandy CG-60 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Cape St.
    [Show full text]
  • NAVY AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Cost-Effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-Powered Carriers
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters August 1998 NAVY AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Cost-Effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-Powered Carriers GAO/NSIAD-98-1 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-259298 August 27, 1998 The Honorable Ted Stevens Chairman The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Defense Committee on Appropriations United States Senate The Honorable C.W. Bill Young Chairman The Honorable John P. Murtha Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on National Security Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives The aircraft carrier forms the building block of the Navy’s forward deployed peacetime presence, crisis response, and war-fighting forces. The nuclear-powered carrier is the most expensive weapon system in the Nation’s arsenal and represents a significant portion of the Navy’s shipbuilding and conversion future years defense program. As requested, this report discusses the cost-effectiveness to the Navy of using conventionally and nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. As the Defense Department and the Navy assess design concepts for a new class of carriers, they will evaluate a number of factors, including different propulsion types. This report contains information and analysis that you may find useful in the process of allocating future defense resources. We are sending copies of this report to the Secretaries of Defense, Navy, Energy, and State and the Director, Office of Management and Budget. Copies will also be made available to others on request. Please contact me on (202) 512-3504 if you or your staff have any questions concerning this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Simulation for Training in the U.S. Navy Surface Force
    Use of Simulation for Training in the U.S. Navy Surface Force Roland J. Yardley • Harry J. Thie • John F. Schank • Jolene Galegher • Jessie L. Riposo Prepared for the United States Navy Approved for public release; distribution unlimited R NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Navy. The research was conducted in RAND’s National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center supported by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the unified commands, and the defense agencies under Contract DASW01-01-C-0004. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Use of simulation for training in the U.S. Navy surface force / Roland J. Yardley ... [et al.]. p. cm. “MR-1770.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8330-3481-2 (pbk. : alk paper) 1. Naval education—United States—Simulation methods. 2. Sailors—Training of—United States. I. Yardley, Roland J. VA11.U84 2003 359.5'078—dc22 2003022269 Cover photograph: United States Navy photo by Photographer's Mate 1st Class Michael W. Pendergrass (www.news.navy.mil) RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Stephen Bloodsworth © Copyright 2003 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2003 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2016 and the Future Years Defense Program
    S. HRG. 114–28, PT. 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 1356 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 2 SEAPOWER MARCH 11, 18 AND 25, 2015 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:33 Aug 02, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 C:\PDF\OUT\20642.TXT WILDA DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM—PART 2 VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:33 Aug 02, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 C:\PDF\OUT\20642.TXT WILDA S. HRG. 114–28 PT. 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON S. 1356 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 2 SEAPOWER MARCH 11, 18, 25, 2015 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov/ U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Key US Aircraft and Ships for Strikes on Iraq
    CSIS_______________________________ Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 775-3270 Key US Aircraft and Ships for Strikes on Iraq Anthony H. Cordesman CSIS Middle East Dynamic Net Assessment February 16, 1998 Copyright Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. Key US Ships and Aircraft for Strikes on Iraq 3/2/98 Page 2 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................................................... 2 F-15 EAGLE ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................. 5 F-16 FIGHTING FALCON................................................................................................................................. 7 FEATURES.......................................................................................................................................................... 7 BACKGROUND...................................................................................................................................................... 7 B-1B LANCER..................................................................................................................................................... 9 MISSION.............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress (name redacted) Specialist in Naval Affairs June 5, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33745 Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program Summary The Aegis ballistic missile defense (BMD) program, which is carried out by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and the Navy, gives Navy Aegis cruisers and destroyers a capability for conducting BMD operations. Under the FY2017 budget submission, the number of BMD-capable Navy Aegis ships was scheduled to grow from 33 at the end of FY2016 to 49 at the end of FY2021. The figure for FY2020 may have included up to four BMD-capable Aegis cruisers in reduced operating status as part of a program to modernize 11 existing Aegis cruisers. Under the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) for European BMD operations, BMD- capable Aegis ships are operating in European waters to defend Europe from potential ballistic missile attacks from countries such as Iran. BMD-capable Aegis ships also operate in the Western Pacific and the Persian Gulf to provide regional defense against potential ballistic missile attacks from countries such as North Korea and Iran. The Aegis BMD program is funded mostly through MDA’s budget. The Navy’s budget provides additional funding for BMD-related efforts. MDA’s proposed FY2018 budget requests a total of $1,710.5 million in procurement and research and development funding for Aegis BMD efforts, including funding for two Aegis Ashore sites in Poland and Romania that are to be part of the EPAA. MDA’s budget also includes operations and maintenance (O&M) and military construction (MilCon) funding for the Aegis BMD program.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs November 10, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33745 Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program Summary The Aegis ballistic missile defense (BMD) program, which is carried out by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and the Navy, gives Navy Aegis cruisers and destroyers a capability for conducting BMD operations. Under MDA and Navy plans, the number of BMD-capable Navy Aegis ships is scheduled to grow from 33 at the end of FY2015 to 48 at the end of FY2020. The figure for FY2020 may include up to four BMD-capable Aegis cruisers in reduced operating status as part of a program to modernize 11 existing Aegis cruisers. Under the Administration’s European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) for European BMD operations, BMD-capable Aegis ships are operating in European waters to defend Europe from potential ballistic missile attacks from countries such as Iran. BMD-capable Aegis ships also operate in the Western Pacific and the Persian Gulf to provide regional defense against potential ballistic missile attacks from countries such as North Korea and Iran. The Aegis BMD program is funded mostly through MDA’s budget. The Navy’s budget provides additional funding for BMD-related efforts. MDA’s proposed FY2016 budget requests a total of $1,843.4 million in procurement and research and development funding for Aegis BMD efforts, including funding for two Aegis Ashore sites in Poland and Romania that are to be part of the EPAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Readiness—Underlying Problems Associated with the Uss Fitzgerald and Uss John S
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 115–57] NAVY READINESS—UNDERLYING PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USS FITZGERALD AND USS JOHN S. McCAIN JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS MEETING JOINTLY WITH SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEAPOWER AND PROJECTION FORCES OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARING HELD SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–560 WASHINGTON : 2018 SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS JOE WILSON, South Carolina, Chairman ROB BISHOP, Utah MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut STEVE RUSSELL, Oklahoma TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii MIKE ROGERS, Alabama CAROL SHEA-PORTER, New Hampshire VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri A. DONALD MCEACHIN, Virginia ELISE M. STEFANIK, New York SALUD O. CARBAJAL, California MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona, Vice Chair ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee STEPHANIE N. MURPHY, Florida TRENT KELLY, Mississippi RO KHANNA, California MIKE GALLAGHER, Wisconsin MARGARET DEAN, Professional Staff Member BRIAN GARRETT, Professional Staff Member MIKE GANCIO, Clerk SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEAPOWER AND PROJECTION FORCES ROBERT J. WITTMAN, Virginia, Chairman K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri SUSAN A. DAVIS, California BRADLEY BYRNE, Alabama, Vice Chair JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam MIKE GALLAGHER, Wisconsin JOHN GARAMENDI, California DUNCAN HUNTER, California DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey PAUL COOK, California SETH MOULTON, Massachusetts JIM BRIDENSTINE, Oklahoma COLLEEN HANABUSA, Hawaii STEPHEN KNIGHT, California A. DONALD MCEACHIN, Virginia RALPH LEE ABRAHAM, Louisiana DAVID SIENICKI, Professional Staff Member PHIL MACNAUGHTON, Professional Staff Member DANIELLE STEITZ, Clerk (II) C O N T E N T S Page STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Bordallo, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • USS Carney (DDG 64) Began Its North-Bound Transit to the Black Sea June 29, 2019, to Enhance Regional Maritime Stability by Participating in Exercise Sea Breeze 2019
    Another example of a mission ready ship because of a U.S. Navy Port Engineer USS Carney en Route to Exercise Sea Breeze 2019 Story Number: NNS190629-01Release Date: 6/29/2019 4:36:00 PM From U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/U.S. 6th Fleet Public Affairs MEDITERRANEAN SEA (NNS) -- The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Carney (DDG 64) began its north-bound transit to the Black Sea June 29, 2019, to enhance regional maritime stability by participating in exercise Sea Breeze 2019. This is the fifth U.S. ship to visit the Black Sea since the beginning of 2019. Nations scheduled to participate in Sea Breeze 2019 include: Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, France, Georgia, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Norway, Poland, Romania, Sweden, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and the United States. This challenging and complex exercise builds on Sea Breeze 2018 to provide a multitude of unique training opportunities designed to enhance our readiness and improve collaboration and interoperability. Carney, forward-deployed by Naval Station Rota, Spain, is conducting naval operations in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of operations in support of U.S. national security interests in Europe. Webmaster’s Note: USS Carney (DDG-64) is the 14th Arleigh Burke-class destroyer in the United States Navy. The ship is the first to be named after Admiral Robert Carney who served as Chief of Naval Operations during President Eisenhower’s administration. USS Carney was laid down 3 August 1993 at Bath Iron Works in Bath, Maine. She was launched 23 July 1994 with Betty Taussig, daughter of Admiral Carney, as sponsor.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2016 and the Future Years Defense Program
    S. HRG. 114–204, PT. 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 1376 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 7 STRATEGIC FORCES MARCH 4, 25; APRIL 15, 22, 29, 2015 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:09 Jan 24, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 C:\USERS\WR47328\DESKTOP\22950.TXT WILDA DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM—Part 7 VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:09 Jan 24, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 C:\USERS\WR47328\DESKTOP\22950.TXT WILDA S. HRG. 114–204, PT. 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 1376 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 7 STATEGIC FORCES MARCH 4, 25; APRIL 15, 22, 29, 2015 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov/ U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy
    , AIRCRAFT CARRIER ENTERPRISE AIR SURVEILLANCE RADAR AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) EXTENDING AN/SPY-6(V) Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN ACROSS THE FLEET America Class LHA USS Gerald R Ford CVN-78 USS America LHA-6 John F Kennedy CVN-79 Tripoli LHA-7 Enterprise CVN-80 Bougainville LHA-8 Nimitz Class CVN Wasp Class LHD USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S Truman CVN-75 USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Dwight D Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C Stennis CVN-74 USS George HW Bush CVN-77 USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 SUBMARINE SURFACE COMBATANT Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) Amphibious Transport Dock Guided Missile Cruiser Los Angeles Class SSN San Antonio Class LPD USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS San Antonio LPD-17 USS Anchorage LPD-23 USS Somerset LPD-25 Ticonderoga Class CG USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Charlotte SSN-766 USS New Orleans LPD-18 USS Arlington LPD-24 USS John P Murtha LPD-26 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Monterey CG-61 USS Cowpens CG-63 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Olympia SSN-717 USS San Juan SSN-751 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Mesa Verde LPD-19 USS Portland LPD-27 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Chancellorsville CG-62 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Hue City CG-66
    [Show full text]
  • (MCDA) Toolkit to Aid in Ranking Naval Mission Vessel Combinations with Uncertainty
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Engineering Management & Systems Engineering Management & Systems Engineering Theses & Dissertations Engineering Fall 2017 Implementation of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Toolkit to Aid in Ranking Naval Mission Vessel Combinations With Uncertainty Andrew R. Miller Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/emse_etds Part of the Industrial Engineering Commons, and the Operational Research Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Andrew R.. "Implementation of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Toolkit to Aid in Ranking Naval Mission Vessel Combinations With Uncertainty" (2017). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Engineering Management & Systems Engineering, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/chev-zj06 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/emse_etds/23 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Engineering Management & Systems Engineering at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Engineering Management & Systems Engineering Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IMPLEMENTATION OF A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS (MCDA) TOOLKIT TO AID IN RANKING NAVAL MISSION VESSEL COMBINATIONS WITH UNCERTAINTY by Andrew R. Miller B.S. May 2009, Old Dominion University M.E. May 2012, Old Dominion University A Doctoral Project Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS ENGINEERING OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December 2017 Approved by: Resit Unal (Chairman) Charles Keating (Member) Adrian Gheorghe (Member) Ariel Pinto (Member) ii ABSTRACT IMPLEMENTATION OF A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS (MCDA) TOOLKIT TO AID IN RANKING NAVAL MISSION VESSEL COMBINATIONS WITH UNCERTAINTY Andrew R.
    [Show full text]