HOME D STATE :Volume 30, No.4 WESTERVILLE, OHIO, APRIL 1929 $1.00 Per Year
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HOME D STATE :Volume 30, No.4 WESTERVILLE, OHIO, APRIL 1929 $1.00 Per Year even search for the evidence in the case. A very W. C. WOODWARD, Coleman. SIDE LIGHTS FROM THE DISCUSSION OVER THE unreasonable demand. TOM POLLARD, Tyler (paired) , WIRTZ PARTY LASH BILL The decision was reached by emphasis upon the JULIAN HYER, Ft. Worth (paired) .. word "show." The two who wrote the decision con 1\.fARGIE NEAL, Carthage (paired). Senator W. C. WooDWARD declared that to those tended that it had the above meaning. Judge 0. S. PINK L. PARRISH, Lubbock (paired). who voted in the Democratic primary, last year, but Lattimore contended that it had no such meaning, The bootleggers are safe for another two years, who did not participate in the presidential conven and vigorously opposed the decision. but certain politicians will have the good women tions there was no obligation to support the presi The Graves bill was written to restore the law to after them. Though the bootleggers need not worry, dential nomi.nee, that he had swallowed a bitter its old meaning. It passed the House and reached certain Senators and Representatives will need to dose to maintain his party regularity when he voted the Senate on March 8. Our report here is based worry much. for Mrs. Ferguson, and for Earle B. Mayfield. He upon the press reports. · · denounced the Wirtz bill roundly, and lamented the MRS. WATTS' STATEMENT The bill had been unfavorably reported by the Mrs. Claude De Van Watts, President of the Texas fact that throughout the debate the names of the wet Senate Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. ''Lieutenant Governor from Dallas" and the "Sena Woman's Christia» Temperance Union, handed out But Senators JuLIAN HYER, of Ft. Worth, and W. E. a statement as follows: tor from Dallas" has resounded, adding: "An out THOMAssoN, of Nacogdoches, brought in ·a minority sider listening in this debate would conclude that "We, the W. C. T. U. representing thousands, are report. SENATOR LovE moved to substitute the mi disappointed but only more determined to dissemi we were legislating for one or against the other of nority for the majority report. SENATOR CLINT C. these men." nate information concerning· the viciousness of the SMALL, of Wellington, moved to lay the Love motion law; how it retards law enforcement and protects That SENATOR WOODWARD was right in t~'liS ob on the table, and Small's motion received 13 votes the criminal at the cost of menacing society. Un servation seemed to be the current opinions of those and there were 13 votes against it. Lieutenant Gov fortunately, the wets of the Senate exerted such who witnessed the debate, strengthened by the fact ernor Barry Miller, saying that he did not like to see influence that our dry ideals and the bill went that Lieutenant Governor BARRY MILLER remained a bill killed in that way, voted ·against tabling it. down. The duty before dry Texas is to see to it in out of the chair most of the time, after making notes THE VOTE the future that our Senate shall be dry. .Women on the speeches, especially those of Senator Love. Those voting for Senator Small's motion to table must rally and have a house cleaning in politics." Senator J. \V. HoRNSBY defended the bill, and Sen Love's motion, were (according to press reports): ator PINK L. PARRISH, who supported Al Smith, spoke J. W. E. H. BECK, DeKalb. against the bill. SENATOR W. R. COUSINS spoke OLIVER CUNNINGHAM,\ Abilene. BILL TO PUNISH ANTI-SMITH DEMOCRATS agains tthe bill. Senator W. E. THOMASSON spoke for C. S. GAINER, Bryan. the bill and rebuked the leadership that "would At the opposite extreme from SENATOR LovE's bill W. J. HOLBROOK, Galveston. in behalf of ((Freedom of Conscience," was SENATOR stand within the ranks and strike at our party and W. N. MARTIN, Hillsboro. affiliate with outside influences in an attempt to MARTIN's (of·Hillsboro) bill to punish those whore EUGENE MILLER, Weatherford. fused to vote for AI Smith. His bill provided that-it tear down our party for their own selfish purposes." ARCHIE PARR, San Diego. Those to whom he evidently referred contented that should be unlawful for any executive, or other party, NAT PATTON, Crockett. committee to print on the ballot the name of those they were endeavoring to save the party from wreck Gus RussEK, Schulenburg. by alien influences, refused to follow the Republican who refused to vote for any party nominee. Its CLINT C. SMALL, Wellington. companion bill in the House was introduced by leader, John J. Raskob, or the nominee who had W. A. WILLIAMSON, San Antonio. repudiated the party's platform, and were doing it LuKE MANKIN. The House killed this bill and there A. J. WIRTZ, Seguin. fore it became useless to bring up MARTIN,~ bill in for wl1oily unselfish purposes. SENATOR Tol'II PoL .. WALTER WOODUL, ·Houston. LARD, who praised those in East Texas who voted for the Senate, for had it passed· the ·senate, it could Al Smith, spoke against the bill. AGAINST TABLING LOVE'S MOTION not have been considered in the House after its a.c .. W. R. COUSINS, Beaumont. tion on the MANKIN bill. BRING DR. STRATON'S NAME IN TOM DEBERRY, Bogata. In the Committee SENATOR LoVE vigorously op SENATOR WIRTZ, author of the bill, and wet leader JULIAN GREER, Athens. posed MARTIN's bill. He contended that the enact of the Senate brought in the name of Dr. John JuLIAN HYER, Ft. Worth. ment of it would transform the Democratic party in Roach Straton, insinuating, or possibly flatly THOMAS B. LOVE, Dallas. Texas into a wet party by driving from the Demo stating, that Dr. Straton had been stirring up "re ·w. D. McFARLANE, Graham. cratic party 300,000 dry Democrats who voted for ligious hatred." Dr. Straton never discussed any PINK L. PARRISH, Lubbock. Hoover. He expressed sympathy for Senator C. C. phase of the "religious question" on his tour of TOM POLLARD, Tyler. SMALL, of Wellington, who favored the MARTIN bill, Texas, but practically every wet leader makes that W. E. THOMASSON, Nacogdoches. when the majority of the voters in his district ·had charge and many wet newspapers do likewise. · ED WESTBROOK, Sherman. followed their conscience and voted for Hoover. He E. E. WITT, Waco. also expressed his sympathy for SENATOR EuGENE THE GOVERNOR'S RACE INVOLVED MILLER, of Weatherford, who retorted, "I'll get along As SENATOR WOODWARD suggested the discussion W. C. WOODWARD, Coleman. PAIRED alone all right if you and Atticus Webb will leave me over the Wirtz bill, indicated that the bill had two alone." ' purposes in view. One to punish those who balked J. W. STEVENSON was for tabling but was paired at swallowing Al Smith and the other to exclude the with MARGIE NEAL who was against tabling the mo dry Democrats from the primary in order to insure tion. BARRY MILLER voted against tabling the mo the nomination of the wet leader, Barry Miller, over tion. THE WIRTZ BILL TO EXCLUDE DRY DEMOCRATS Tom Love for Governor in 1930. THE BILL KILLED ON MOTION OF Failing in putting over the Martln-Mankin bill to SENATOR SMALL punish the Anti-S~ith Democrats, Senator Wirtz, wet leader of the Senate, and who, with J. J. Boyle, Senator Small moved indefinitely to postpone the of San Antonio, led the wets at the State Demo THE GRAVES BILL ON SEARCH AND SEIZURE bill, which killed it. The vote (from press reports) cratic Convention last year at Beaumont, intro was as follows: duced another bill to accomplish the same end. IN SENATE INDEFINITELY TO POSTPON~ OR KILL Wirtz's bill was introduced so late that had it been In this issue we are reporting only on the record J. W. E. H. BECK, DeKalb. favorable to prohibition, it would not have got past of the Senate. A bill had come over to the Senate C. S. GAINER, Bryan. the wet committee in time for consideration. But from the House relating to Search and Seizure. It CARL C. HARDIN, Stephenville. the committee reported it favorably within half an was known as the Graves Bill. This was not the W. J. HOLBROOK, Galveston. hour after it was introduced and it has passed both Graves bill adversely discussed in the February is W. N. MARTIN, Hillsboro. Houses, and now awaits the Governor's signature. sue of HoME AND STATE, but relates entirely to a dif EUGENE MILLER, Weatherford. He can veto it and kill it. He can sign it, or refuse ferent phase of the question. NAT PATTON, Crockett. to do either and allow it to become a law. At this The Dean act has an expression to the effect that Gus RussEK, Schulenburg. writing no one seems to know what he will do. Many before a search warrant can be issued to search a CLINT C. SMALL, Crockett. AI Smith Democrats are urging him to kill the bill private residence, there must be affidavits by two W. A. WILLIAMSON, San Antonio. and save the party. Others urge him to sign the bill reputable citizens showing that the law was being A. J. WIRTZ, Seguin. and punish the Anti-Smith Democrats. violated in that residence. Throl.lgh all previous WALTER WOODUL, Houston. HISTORY OF THE BILL history of Texas affidavits to the effect that the OLIVER CUNNINGHAM, Abilene (paired) • The bill looks innocent to those who do not know affiants "had reason to believe and did believe" that E. E. WITT, Waco (paired) . its purposes.