DOCSLIB.ORG

Tangent Vectors, Tangent Bundle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tangent Vectors, Tangent Bundle INTRODUCTION TO MANIFOLDS | II Tangent Bundles 1. Tangent vectors, tangent space. Let M n be a smooth n-dimensional manifold, endowed with an atlas of charts x: U ! Rn, y : V ! Rn, ::: , where M = U [ V [ ¢ ¢ ¢ are domains of the corre- sponding charts. ~ De¯nition. Two smooth curves 'i :(¡"; ") ! M, i = 1; 2, passing through the same point p 2 M, are said to be 1-equivalent, '1 » '2, if in some chart x: U ! Rn + kx('1(t)) ¡ x('2(t))k = o(t) as t ! 0 : (1) | Problem 1. Prove that the condition (1) is actually independent of the choice of the chart. ~ De¯nition. The tangent space to the manifold M at the point p is the quo- tient space C1(R1;M)= » by the equivalence (1). Notations: the equivalence class of a curve ' will be denoted by [']p. Instead of saying that a curve ' belongs to a certain equivalence class v = [¢]p, we say that the curve ' is tangent to the vector v. | Problem 2. Prove that the tangent space at each point is isomorphic to the arithmetic space Rn. Solution. Fix any chart x around the point p and consider the maps isof; iso de¯ned as n 1 ¡1 iso:f R ! C (R;M); v = (v1; : : : ; vn) 7! 'v(¢);'v(t) = x (x(p) + tv) (2) iso(v) = [iso(f v)]p: (3) This map is injective (prove!). To prove its surjectivity, for any smooth curve ' consider its x-coordinate representation, x('(t)) = x(p) + tv + ¢ ¢ ¢ ; existing by virtue of di®erentiability of the latter. Then iso(f v) » '. Remark. This is a good example of abstract nonsense! The idea is that you associate with each curve its linear terms, the coordinate system being ¯xed. Then any curve is uniquely de¯ned by its linear terms up to the 1-equivalence, since the de¯nition (1) was designed especially for this purpose! Typeset by AMS-TEX 1 2 TANGENT BUNDLES ~ De¯nition. The string of real numbers (v1; : : : ; vn) is called the coordinate representation of the tangent vector [']p in the coordinate system x. | Problem 3. If M n is a hypersurface in Rn+1, then the tangent space is well de- ¯ned by geometric means. Prove that this \geometric" tangent space is isomorphic to the one de¯ned by the abstract de¯nition above. A good exercise for practicing in abstract nonsense! Important note: The coordinate system x occurs in the construction of iso- morphisms (2), (3) in the most essential way! If another coordinate system is chosen, then the isomorphisms will be completely di®erent. | Problem 4. Let v = [']p 2 TpM be a tangent vector associated with a tuple (v1; : : : ; vn) in a coordinate system x, and y another coordinate system around the same point, with the transition functions h: y = h(x) () x = h¡1(y). Find the coordinate representation of the same vector in the new coordinates y. | Problem 5. Prove that the tangent space possesses the natural linear struc- ture. (Warning: you have to formalize, what does this mean!) Notations: the tangent space at a point p 2 M is denoted by TpM. Remark. If some two points p; q belong to the same coordinate neighborhood x and (v1; : : : ; vn) is a tuple of reals, then one can take two vectors with the same coordinates, but attached to di®erent points p and q. These two vectors must be considered as tt di®erent! In other words, TpM \TqM = ?, if p 6= q. This seemingly contradicts the geometric intuition, but is much more convenient for other means. | Problem 6. Prove that in general two vectors attached to di®erent points but having the same coordiantes in a certain chart, become di®erent in another coordinate system. ~ De¯nition. The tangent bundle of the manifold M is another manifold TM, which is de¯ned (as the point set) as [ TM = TpM: p2M The structure of a smooth manifold is de¯ned on TM explicitly. If f U® g is an ® n atlas of charts, x : U® ! R , with the transition functions h®¯, then we de¯ne the charts V® covering TM in the following way, [ V® = TpM ⊆ T M; p2U® ® 2n and introduce the coordinate functions X : V® ! R by the formulas ® ® ® ® ® v 2 TpM; p 2 U® =) X (v) = (x1 ; : : : ; xn; v1 ; : : : ; vn ); (4) ® ® where (v1 ; : : : ; vn ) is the coordinate representation of the vector v in the coordinate system x®. INTRODUCTION TO MANIFOLDS | II 3 Immediately the following series of questions arises. | Problem 7. Prove that each of the maps X® is one-to-one, and all the charts V® constitute a covering of TM. | Problem 8. Write down explicitly the transition functions between the charts ® ¯ ® ¡1 X , H®¯ = X ± (X ) , and prove that they are di®erentiable. What is the guaranteed order of their smoothness? } Example. The tangent bundle to the Euclidean space Rn is the Euclidean space R2n. More generally, if U ⊆ Rn is an open domain, then TU ' U £ Rn. } Example. The tungent bundle T S1 to the circle S1 is the cylinder S1 £ R1. | Problem 9. Is it true that TM is always di®eomorphic to M £ Rn? 2. Tangent maps Let M m;N n be two smooth manifolds, TM and TN their tangent bundles, and f : M ! N a smooth map. | Problem 10. If there are two 1-equivalent curves, '1 and '2 passing through the same point p 2 M, then the two curves f ± 'i, i = 1; 2, are also 1-equivalent. Prove this. Is the converse true? ~ De¯nition. The differential of the map f at the point p 2 M is the map taking a tangent vector [']p 2 TpM to the vector [f ± ']q 2 TqN, where q = f(p) 2 N is the image of the point p. The di®erential is denoted by f¤p : TpM ! Tf(p)N; v 7! f¤pv: | Problem 11. Prove that the di®erential is a linear map (in which sense?). This explains why in the previous formula we did not use parentheses around the argument v. ~ De¯nition. The tangent map (sometimes it is also called di®erential) to (of) the map f is the map f¤ : TM ! T N; (p; v) 7! (f(p); f¤pv): @f 0 Another possible notations for the tangent map: Df, T f, @p , f , in short, almost all symbols used for derivatives in elementary calculus. | Problem 12. Prove that if f is a di®eomorphism between M and N, then f¤ is a di®eomorphism between the corresponding tangent bundles. | Problem 13. Let S1 ' f z 2 C: jzj = 1 g be the unit circle, and f : S1 ! S1 the map z 7! z2. Compute its di®erential. 4 TANGENT BUNDLES The tangent bundle is a certain way to associate with any point of a smooth manifold M, a linear space TpM which di®erentiably depends on the point p. The linear struc- ture on this space is canonical, that is, de¯ned without any reference to the coordinates. All additional geometric structures on manifolds (di®erential forms, Riemann met- ric, volumes, symplectic structure etc are based on such a fundamental structure associated with a manifold. 3. Vector fields There exists the natural projection ¼ : TM ! M, which is a smooth map (prove!) taking each pair (p; v); v 2 TpM into the point p at which the latter is attached. ~ De¯nition. A section of the tangent bundle is a smooth map u: M ! TM which satis¯es the identity ¼ ± u = idM . (Another excellent example of jabberwocky: a section u is a certain way to asso- ciate a vector u(p) with any point p in such a way that it would depend di®erentiably on the point p.) A section of the tangent bundle is usually called a vector ¯eld on the manifold M. The notion of a vector ¯eld is a substitute to the notion of an ordinary di®erential equation on manifolds. ~ De¯nition. An integral curve (sometimes phase curve) of a vector ¯eld u is a smooth map ': R1 ¶ I ! M; t 7! '(t); such that 8t 2 I [']p = u(p); where p = f(t): Again an abstract nonsense: an integral curve is a curve which is tangent to the vector ¯eld u at all points of the former. | Problem 14. Prove that a smooth vector ¯eld u in any coordinate neighbor- hood is determined by n smooth functions u1(x1; : : : ; xn); : : : ; un(x1; : : : ; xn), and a curve determined by its coordinate representation as t 7! x(t) = (x1(t); : : : ; xn(t)); t 2 I is integral if and only if it satis¯es the di®erential equation x_ i = ui(x1; : : : ; xn); i = 1; : : : ; n: (5) | Problem 15. How would you de¯ne a nonautonomous di®erential equation? INTRODUCTION TO MANIFOLDS | II 5 The same vector ¯eld in di®erent coordinates gives rise to di®erent di®erential equations, though proprties of these equations remain the same up to a di®eomorphism. So a great idea comes: one has to study vector ¯elds in a coordinate system in which the corresponding di®erential equations would have the simplest form. In short, it is useful to look for possible transformations of a given ODE. | Problem 16. Find a formula for change of variables in ordinary di®erential equations. The principal result concerning di®erential equations of the form (5) is the exis- tence/uniqueness theorem. Theorem. If the right hand side parts of a di®erential equation (5) in a certain domain U ⊆ Rn are su±ciently smooth, then for any point a 2 U and for all su±ciently small values of t 2 (R1; 0) there exists a unique solution to (5) starting at a, that is, a smooth vector function 'a : t 7! (x1(t); : : : ; xn(t)) 2 U satisfying the equation (5) and the initial condition 'a(0) = a: The function F : R £ U 3 (t; a) 7! 'a(t) 2 U is de¯ned on an open subset of Rn+1 and smooth on it (whenever de¯ned).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Geometric Take on Metric Learning
    A Geometric take on Metric Learning Søren Hauberg Oren Freifeld Michael J. Black MPI for Intelligent Systems Brown University MPI for Intelligent Systems Tubingen,¨ Germany Providence, US Tubingen,¨ Germany [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Multi-metric learning techniques learn local metric tensors in different parts of a feature space. With such an approach, even simple classifiers can be competitive with the state-of-the-art because the distance measure locally adapts to the struc- ture of the data. The learned distance measure is, however, non-metric, which has prevented multi-metric learning from generalizing to tasks such as dimensional- ity reduction and regression in a principled way. We prove that, with appropriate changes, multi-metric learning corresponds to learning the structure of a Rieman- nian manifold. We then show that this structure gives us a principled way to perform dimensionality reduction and regression according to the learned metrics. Algorithmically, we provide the first practical algorithm for computing geodesics according to the learned metrics, as well as algorithms for computing exponential and logarithmic maps on the Riemannian manifold. Together, these tools let many Euclidean algorithms take advantage of multi-metric learning. We illustrate the approach on regression and dimensionality reduction tasks that involve predicting measurements of the human body from shape data. 1 Learning and Computing Distances Statistics relies on measuring distances. When the Euclidean metric is insufficient, as is the case in many real problems, standard methods break down. This is a key motivation behind metric learning, which strives to learn good distance measures from data.
    [Show full text]
  • Connections on Bundles Md
    Dhaka Univ. J. Sci. 60(2): 191-195, 2012 (July) Connections on Bundles Md. Showkat Ali, Md. Mirazul Islam, Farzana Nasrin, Md. Abu Hanif Sarkar and Tanzia Zerin Khan Department of Mathematics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh, Email: [email protected] Received on 25. 05. 2011.Accepted for Publication on 15. 12. 2011 Abstract This paper is a survey of the basic theory of connection on bundles. A connection on tangent bundle , is called an affine connection on an -dimensional smooth manifold . By the general discussion of affine connection on vector bundles that necessarily exists on which is compatible with tensors. I. Introduction = < , > (2) In order to differentiate sections of a vector bundle [5] or where <, > represents the pairing between and ∗. vector fields on a manifold we need to introduce a Then is a section of , called the absolute differential structure called the connection on a vector bundle. For quotient or the covariant derivative of the section along . example, an affine connection is a structure attached to a differentiable manifold so that we can differentiate its Theorem 1. A connection always exists on a vector bundle. tensor fields. We first introduce the general theorem of Proof. Choose a coordinate covering { }∈ of . Since connections on vector bundles. Then we study the tangent vector bundles are trivial locally, we may assume that there is bundle. is a -dimensional vector bundle determine local frame field for any . By the local structure of intrinsically by the differentiable structure [8] of an - connections, we need only construct a × matrix on dimensional smooth manifold . each such that the matrices satisfy II.
    [Show full text]
  • FOLIATIONS Introduction. the Study of Foliations on Manifolds Has a Long
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 80, Number 3, May 1974 FOLIATIONS BY H. BLAINE LAWSON, JR.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Definitions and general examples. 2. Foliations of dimension-one. 3. Higher dimensional foliations; integrability criteria. 4. Foliations of codimension-one; existence theorems. 5. Notions of equivalence; foliated cobordism groups. 6. The general theory; classifying spaces and characteristic classes for foliations. 7. Results on open manifolds; the classification theory of Gromov-Haefliger-Phillips. 8. Results on closed manifolds; questions of compact leaves and stability. Introduction. The study of foliations on manifolds has a long history in mathematics, even though it did not emerge as a distinct field until the appearance in the 1940's of the work of Ehresmann and Reeb. Since that time, the subject has enjoyed a rapid development, and, at the moment, it is the focus of a great deal of research activity. The purpose of this article is to provide an introduction to the subject and present a picture of the field as it is currently evolving. The treatment will by no means be exhaustive. My original objective was merely to summarize some recent developments in the specialized study of codimension-one foliations on compact manifolds. However, somewhere in the writing I succumbed to the temptation to continue on to interesting, related topics. The end product is essentially a general survey of new results in the field with, of course, the customary bias for areas of personal interest to the author. Since such articles are not written for the specialist, I have spent some time in introducing and motivating the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION to ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY 1. Preliminary Of
    INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEI-PING LI 1. Preliminary of Calculus on Manifolds 1.1. Tangent Vectors. What are tangent vectors we encounter in Calculus? 2 0 (1) Given a parametrised curve α(t) = x(t); y(t) in R , α (t) = x0(t); y0(t) is a tangent vector of the curve. (2) Given a surface given by a parameterisation x(u; v) = x(u; v); y(u; v); z(u; v); @x @x n = × is a normal vector of the surface. Any vector @u @v perpendicular to n is a tangent vector of the surface at the corresponding point. (3) Let v = (a; b; c) be a unit tangent vector of R3 at a point p 2 R3, f(x; y; z) be a differentiable function in an open neighbourhood of p, we can have the directional derivative of f in the direction v: @f @f @f D f = a (p) + b (p) + c (p): (1.1) v @x @y @z In fact, given any tangent vector v = (a; b; c), not necessarily a unit vector, we still can define an operator on the set of functions which are differentiable in open neighbourhood of p as in (1.1) Thus we can take the viewpoint that each tangent vector of R3 at p is an operator on the set of differential functions at p, i.e. @ @ @ v = (a; b; v) ! a + b + c j ; @x @y @z p or simply @ @ @ v = (a; b; c) ! a + b + c (1.2) @x @y @z 3 with the evaluation at p understood.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Tensor Fields
    3.1 The tangent bundle. So far we have considered vectors and tensors at a point. We now wish to consider fields of vectors and tensors. The union of all tangent spaces is called the tangent bundle and denoted TM: TM = ∪x∈M TxM . (3.1.1) The tangent bundle can be given a natural manifold structure derived from the manifold structure of M. Let π : TM → M be the natural projection that associates a vector v ∈ TxM to the point x that it is attached to. Let (UA, ΦA) be an atlas on M. We construct an atlas on TM as follows. The domain of a −1 chart is π (UA) = ∪x∈UA TxM, i.e. it consists of all vectors attached to points that belong to UA. The local coordinates of a vector v are (x1,...,xn, v1,...,vn) where (x1,...,xn) are the coordinates of x and v1,...,vn are the components of the vector with respect to the coordinate basis (as in (2.2.7)). One can easily check that a smooth coordinate trasformation on M induces a smooth coordinate transformation on TM (the transformation of the vector components is given by (2.3.10), so if M is of class Cr, TM is of class Cr−1). In a similar way one defines the cotangent bundle ∗ ∗ T M = ∪x∈M Tx M , (3.1.2) the tensor bundles s s TMr = ∪x∈M TxMr (3.1.3) and the bundle of p-forms p p Λ M = ∪x∈M Λx . (3.1.4) 3.2 Vector and tensor fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 2 Tangent Space, Differential Forms, Riemannian Manifolds
    Lecture 2 tangent space, differential forms, Riemannian manifolds differentiable manifolds A manifold is a set that locally look like Rn. For example, a two-dimensional sphere S2 can be covered by two subspaces, one can be the northen hemisphere extended slightly below the equator and another can be the southern hemisphere extended slightly above the equator. Each patch can be mapped smoothly into an open set of R2. In general, a manifold M consists of a family of open sets Ui which covers M, i.e. iUi = M, n ∪ and, for each Ui, there is a continuous invertible map ϕi : Ui R . To be precise, to define → what we mean by a continuous map, we has to define M as a topological space first. This requires a certain set of properties for open sets of M. We will discuss this in a couple of weeks. For now, we assume we know what continuous maps mean for M. If you need to know now, look at one of the standard textbooks (e.g., Nakahara). Each (Ui, ϕi) is called a coordinate chart. Their collection (Ui, ϕi) is called an atlas. { } The map has to be one-to-one, so that there is an inverse map from the image ϕi(Ui) to −1 Ui. If Ui and Uj intersects, we can define a map ϕi ϕj from ϕj(Ui Uj)) to ϕi(Ui Uj). ◦ n ∩ ∩ Since ϕj(Ui Uj)) to ϕi(Ui Uj) are both subspaces of R , we express the map in terms of n ∩ ∩ functions and ask if they are differentiable.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. the Inverse Function Theorem We Now Want to Aim for a Version of the Inverse Function Theorem
    5. The inverse function theorem We now want to aim for a version of the Inverse function Theorem. In differential geometry, the inverse function theorem states that if a function is an isomorphism on tangent spaces, then it is locally an isomorphism. Unfortunately this is too much to expect in algebraic geometry, since the Zariski topology is too weak for this to be true. For example consider a curve which double covers another curve. At any point where there are two points in the fibre, the map on tangent spaces is an isomorphism. But there is no Zariski neighbourhood of any point where the map is an isomorphism. Thus a minimal requirement is that the morphism is a bijection. Note that this is not enough in general for a morphism between al- gebraic varieties to be an isomorphism. For example in characteristic p, Frobenius is nowhere smooth and even in characteristic zero, the parametrisation of the cuspidal cubic is a bijection but not an isomor- phism. Lemma 5.1. If f : X −! Y is a projective morphism with finite fibres, then f is finite. Proof. Since the result is local on the base, we may assume that Y is affine. By assumption X ⊂ Y × Pn and we are projecting onto the first factor. Possibly passing to a smaller open subset of Y , we may assume that there is a point p 2 Pn such that X does not intersect Y × fpg. As the blow up of Pn at p, fibres over Pn−1 with fibres isomorphic to P1, and the composition of finite morphisms is finite, we may assume that n = 1, by induction on n.
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT IS a CONNECTION, and WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR? Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. the Search for a Good Directional Derivative 3 3. F
    WHAT IS A CONNECTION, AND WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR? TIMOTHY E. GOLDBERG Abstract. In the study of differentiable manifolds, there are several different objects that go by the name of \connection". I will describe some of these objects, and show how they are related to each other. The motivation for many notions of a connection is the search for a sufficiently nice directional derivative, and this will be my starting point as well. The story will by necessity include many supporting characters from differential geometry, all of whom will receive a brief but hopefully sufficient introduction. I apologize for my ungrammatical title. Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. The search for a good directional derivative 3 3. Fiber bundles and Ehresmann connections 7 4. A quick word about curvature 10 5. Principal bundles and principal bundle connections 11 6. Associated bundles 14 7. Vector bundles and Koszul connections 15 8. The tangent bundle 18 References 19 Date: 26 March 2008. 1 1. Introduction In the study of differentiable manifolds, there are several different objects that go by the name of \connection", and this has been confusing me for some time now. One solution to this dilemma was to promise myself that I would some day present a talk about connections in the Olivetti Club at Cornell University. That day has come, and this document contains my notes for this talk. In the interests of brevity, I do not include too many technical details, and instead refer the reader to some lovely references. My main references were [2], [4], and [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Topology
    Differential Topology: Homework Set # 3. 1) Basic on tangent bundles. Recall that the tangent bundle TM to an extrinsicly defined manifold M k ⊂ Rn is defined to be: n n k n ∼ n TM := {(p, v) ∈ R × R | p ∈ M , v ∈ TpM ⊂ TpR = R } This exercise is designed to give you some practice working with tangent bundles. (i) Show that for a manifold M, the tangent bundle TM is well-defined, i.e. does not depend on the embedding M k ⊂ Rn. (ii) If M, N are a pair of smooth manifolds, show that T (M × N) is diffeomorphic to TM × TN. (iii) If f : M → R is a smooth, positive function, show that the corresponding scaling map φ : TM → TM defined by φ(p, v) = (p, f(p) · v) is a diffeomorphism. (iv) Show that the tangent bundle to S1 (the unit sphere) is diffeomorphic to the cylinder S1 × R. (v) Show that if Sn is an arbitrary sphere, then there exists a diffeomorphism between (TSn) × R and Sn × Rn+1. 2) Relatives of the tangent bundle. Closely associated to the tangent bundle are some other manifolds: (i) For an extrinsicly defined manifold M k ⊂ Rn, define the normal bundle as follows: n n k ⊥ n ∼ n N(M) := {(p, v) ∈ R × R | p ∈ M , v ∈ TpM ⊂ TpR = R } Show that N(M) is an n-dimensional manifold. (ii) Show that for the standard n-sphere Sn ⊂ Rn+1, the normal bundle N(Sn) is diffeomorphic to Sn × R. (iii) Consider the subset T 1M of TM consisting of pairs (p, v) ∈ TM with ||v|| = 1 (where || · || denotes the standard norm on Rn).
    [Show full text]
  • The Orientation Manifesto (For Undergraduates)
    The Orientation Manifesto (for undergraduates) Timothy E. Goldberg 11 November 2007 An orientation of a vector space is represented by an ordered basis of the vector space. We think of an orientation as a twirl, namely the twirl that rotates the first basis vector to the second, and the second to the third, and so on. Two ordered bases represent the same orientation if they generate the same twirl. (This amounts to the linear transformation taking one basis to the other having positive determinant.) If you think about it carefully, there are only ever two choices of twirls, and hence only two choices of orientation. n Because each R has a standard choice of ordered basis, fe1; e2; : : : ; eng (where ei is has 1 in the ith coordinates and 0 everywhere else), each Rn has a standard choice of orientation. The standard orientation of R is the twirl that points in the positive direction. The standard orientation of R2 is the counterclockwise twirl, moving from 3 e1 = (1; 0) to e2 = (0; 1). The standard orientation of R is a twirl that sweeps from the positive x direction to the positive y direction, and up the positive z direction. It's like a directed helix, pointed up and spinning in the counterclockwise direction if viewed from above. See Figure 1. An orientation of a curve, or a surface, or a solid body, is really a choice of orientations of every single tangent space, in such a way that the twirls all agree with each other. (This can be made horribly precise, when necessary.) There are several ways for a manifold to pick up an orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector Bundles and Connections
    VECTOR BUNDLES AND CONNECTIONS WERNER BALLMANN The exposition of vector bundles and connections below is taken from my lecture notes on differential geometry at the University of Bonn. I included more material than I usually cover in my lectures. On the other hand, I completely deleted the discussion of “concrete examples”, so that a pinch of salt has to be added by the customer. Standard references for vector bundles and connections are [GHV] and [KN], where the interested reader finds a rather comprehensive discussion of the subject. I would like to thank Andreas Balser for pointing out some misprints. The exposition is still in a preliminary state. Suggestions are very welcome. Contents 1. Vector Bundles 2 1.1. Sections 4 1.2. Frames 5 1.3. Constructions 7 1.4. Pull Back 9 1.5. The Fundamental Lemma on Morphisms 10 2. Connections 12 2.1. Local Data 13 2.2. Induced Connections 15 2.3. Pull Back 16 3. Curvature 18 3.1. Parallel Translation and Curvature 21 4. Miscellanea 26 4.1. Metrics 26 4.2. Cocycles and Bundles 27 References 28 Date: December 1999. Last corrections March 2002. 1 2 WERNERBALLMANN 1. Vector Bundles A bundle is a triple (π,E,M), where π : E → M is a map. In other words, a bundle is nothing else but a map. The term bundle is used −1 when the emphasis is on the preimages Ep := π (p) of the points p ∈ M; we call Ep the fiber of π over p and p the base point of Ep.
    [Show full text]
  • On Manifolds of Negative Curvature, Geodesic Flow, and Ergodicity
    ON MANIFOLDS OF NEGATIVE CURVATURE, GEODESIC FLOW, AND ERGODICITY CLAIRE VALVA Abstract. We discuss geodesic flow on manifolds of negative sectional curva- ture. We find that geodesic flow is ergodic on the tangent bundle of a manifold, and present the proof for both n = 2 on surfaces and general n. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Riemannian Manifolds 1 2.1. Geodesic Flow 2 2.2. Horospheres and Horocycle Flows 3 2.3. Curvature 4 2.4. Jacobi Fields 4 3. Anosov Flows 4 4. Ergodicity 5 5. Surfaces of Negative Curvature 6 5.1. Fuchsian Groups and Hyperbolic Surfaces 6 6. Geodesic Flow on Hyperbolic Surfaces 7 7. The Ergodicity of Geodesic Flow on Compact Manifolds of Negative Sectional Curvature 8 7.1. Foliations and Absolute Continuity 9 7.2. Proof of Ergodicity 12 Acknowledgments 14 References 14 1. Introduction We want to understand the behavior of geodesic flow on a manifold M of constant negative curvature. If we consider a vector in the unit tangent bundle of M, where does that vector go (or not go) when translated along its unique geodesic path. In a sense, we will show that the vector goes \everywhere," or that the vector visits a full measure subset of T 1M. 2. Riemannian Manifolds We first introduce some of the initial definitions and concepts that allow us to understand Riemannian manifolds. Date: August 2019. 1 2 CLAIRE VALVA Definition 2.1. If M is a differentiable manifold and α :(−, ) ! M is a dif- ferentiable curve, where α(0) = p 2 M, then the tangent vector to the curve α at t = 0 is a function α0(0) : D ! R, where d(f ◦ α) α0(0)f = j dt t=0 for f 2 D, where D is the set of functions on M that are differentiable at p.
    [Show full text]