DOCSLIB.ORG

Connections on Bundles Md

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Connections on Bundles Md Dhaka Univ. J. Sci. 60(2): 191-195, 2012 (July) Connections on Bundles Md. Showkat Ali, Md. Mirazul Islam, Farzana Nasrin, Md. Abu Hanif Sarkar and Tanzia Zerin Khan Department of Mathematics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh, Email: [email protected] Received on 25. 05. 2011.Accepted for Publication on 15. 12. 2011 Abstract This paper is a survey of the basic theory of connection on bundles. A connection on tangent bundle , is called an affine connection on an -dimensional smooth manifold . By the general discussion of affine connection on vector bundles that necessarily exists on which is compatible with tensors. I. Introduction = < , > (2) In order to differentiate sections of a vector bundle [5] or where <, > represents the pairing between and ∗. vector fields on a manifold we need to introduce a Then is a section of , called the absolute differential structure called the connection on a vector bundle. For quotient or the covariant derivative of the section along . example, an affine connection is a structure attached to a differentiable manifold so that we can differentiate its Theorem 1. A connection always exists on a vector bundle. tensor fields. We first introduce the general theorem of Proof. Choose a coordinate covering { }∈ of . Since connections on vector bundles. Then we study the tangent vector bundles are trivial locally, we may assume that there is bundle. is a -dimensional vector bundle determine local frame field for any . By the local structure of intrinsically by the differentiable structure [8] of an - connections, we need only construct a × matrix on dimensional smooth manifold . each such that the matrices satisfy II. Connections on Vector Bundles = . + . (3) under a change of the local frame field, which is the A connection on a fiber bundle [7] is a device that defines transformation formula for a connection, a most important a notion of parallel transport on the bundle, that is, a way formula in differential geometry. to connect or identify fibers over nearby points. If the We may assume that {} is locally finite, and {} is a fiber bundle is a vector bundle, then the notion of parallel corresponding sub-ordinate partition of unity such that transport is required to be linear. Such a connection is supp ⊂ . When ∩ ≠ ∅, there naturally exists a equivalently specified by a covariant derivative, which is non-degenerate matrix of smooth functions on ∩ an operator that can differentiate sections of that bundle such that along tangent directions in the base manifold [3]. = . , ≠ 0 (4) Connections in this sense generalize, to arbitrary vector For every ∈ , choose an arbitrary × matrix of bundles, the concept of a linear connection on the tangent differential 1-forms on . Let bundle of a smooth manifold, and are sometimes known = . . as linear connections. Nonlinear connections are ∈ connections that are not necessarily linear in this sense. + . . (5) Definition 1. A connection on a vector bundle is a map where the terms in the sums over with ∩ = ∅ are ∶ Γ() → zero. Then is a matrix of differential 1-forms on . We Γ(∗ ⊗ ) (1) need only demonstrate the following transformation formula which satisfies the following conditions: for ∩ ≠ ∅: (i) For any , ∈ Γ(), = . + . (6) ( + ) = + This can be done by a direct calculation. First observe that (ii) For ∈ Γ () and any () , when ∩ ∩ ≠ ∅, the following is true in the () = ⊗ + intersection: Suppose is a smooth tangent vector fields on . = . and ∈ Γ (). Let Thus on ∩ ≠ ∅ we have 192 Md. Showkat Ali et.al Thus is the desired local frame field. □ . = . Theorem 3. Suppose , are two arbitrary smooth tangent ∩ ∩ ∅ vector fields on the manifold . Then + . . . (, ) = − − [ , ] (9) = − . Proof. Because the absolute differential quotient and the This is precisely (6). We see from the above that there is curvature operator are local operators, we need only consider much freedom in the choice of a connection. This the operations of both sides of (9) on a local section. completes the proof of the theorem. □ Suppose ∈ Γ() has the local expression Remark 1. In particular, if we let = 0 in (6), then = we obtain a connection on whose connection matrix on is Then = . = ∑( + ∑ < , >) , (10) By the transformation formula (3) for connection matrices, the vanishing of a connection matrix is not an and = ∑{ ( ) + ∑ ( < , > invariant property. In fact, for an arbitrary connection, we + < , >) can always find a local frame field with respect to which ∑ ( < , > + ∑ < , > < , >)} . the connection matrix is zero at some point. This fact is useful in calculations involving connections. Hence − = ∑{ [, ] + ∑ ( < Theorem 2. Suppose is a connection on a vector bundle [, ], > + < , > − ∑ >)} = , and ∈ . Then there exists a local frame field in a [ , ] + ∑, < , > (11) coordinate neighborhood of such that the corresponding connection matrix is zero at . That is, Proof. Choose a coordinate neighborhood (; ) of (, ) = − − [ , ] such that () = 0, 1 ≤ ≤ . Suppose is a local This completes the proof of the theorem. □ frame field on with corresponding connection matrix = (), Theorem 4. The curvature matrix satisfies the Bianchi identity where = − . Proof: Apply exterior differentiation [9] to both sides of = Γ (7) = − = − + = −( + ) + ( + ) and the Γ are smooth functions on . Let = − = − Γ (). This completes the proof of the theorem. □ Remark 2. If a section of a vector bundle satisfies the Then = ( ) is the identity matrix at . Hence there condition = 0, then is called a parallel section. exists a neighborhood ⊂ of such that is non- III. Affine Connections degenerate in . Thus Definition 2. Let be a smooth n-dimensional manifold, = . (8) be the set of smooth functions and Γ() be the vector space is a local frame field on . Since of smooth vector fields. An affine connection on is a map (denoted by ) () = −(), ∶ Γ() × Γ() → Γ() we can obtain from (3), ( , ) ↦ () = (. + . )() such that = − () + () () ( + ) = + = 0 () = + Connections on Bundles 193 () ( ) = () + Γ = + . (12) () = ; ∀ ∈ and , ∈ Γ() under a local change of coordinates. Therefore the Γ are the IV. Affine Connection in Two Coordinates Charts coefficients of some connection and is torsion-free. Let (, ) be a coordinate chart on a manifold , with Theorem 5. Suppose is a torsion-free affine connection on coordinates ( , , … , ). Then the vector fields and . Then for any point ∈ there exists a local coordinate can be expressed as system such that the corresponding connection coefficients Γ vanish at . = () Proof. Suppose (; ) is a local coordinating system at with connection coefficients Γ . Let ( ) = 1 = + Γ ()( − ()) ( 2 For some smooth functions () and (). In , − ()) (13) are smooth vector fields. ∇ is again a smooth Then, = , = Γ () (14) vector field. Thus Thus the matrix ( ) is non-degenerate near , and (13) = Γ provides for a change of local coordinates in a neighborhood of . From (12) we see that the connection coefficients Γ For some smooth functions Γ () . Here Γ () is a function. in the new coordinate system satisfy ⇒ = ∑ Γ ; where = , = ( ) Γ = 0 ; 1 ≤ , , ≤ and = This completes the proof of the theorem. □ Let us compute Theorem 6. Suppose is a torsion-free affine connection on = ∑ ∑ . Then we have the Bianchi identity: = ∑ ( ∑ ) [By axiom ()] , + , + , = 0 . = ∑ ∑ ( ) [By axiom ()] Proof. From Theorem 4, we have ∑ ∑ = − , = ( ) [By axiom ()] ∑ ∑ ( ) that is, = ( + ) [By axiom ()] ∑ ∑ ( ) ∑ = ( + Γ ) The functions Γ() are called coordinate symbols of the = Γ − Γ . affine connection . The vector field is often called covariant derivative of vector field along the vector Therefore field . , = Definition 3. If the torsion tensor of an affine connection − Γ − Γ = 0, is zero, then the connection is said to be torsion free. A torsion-free affine connection always exists. In fact, if where in the last equality we have used the torsion-free property of the connection. Hence the coefficients of a connection are Γ , then the set 1 (, + , + ,) = 0 (15) Γ = Γ + Γ . 2 Now since the coefficients of (15) are skew-symmetric with respect to , , ℎ , we have Obviously, Γ is symmetric with respect to the lower indices and satisfies , + , + , = 0 This completes the proof of the theorem. □ 194 Md. Showkat Ali et.al V. Connection Compatible with Tensors (u1,u2 ,u3 ) (u2 ,u1,u3 ) (u2 ,u3 ,u1 ) Let M be a smooth manifold and be any tensor in M. (u ,u ,u ), Mostly this can be interested in the case when = g is a 3 2 1 semi-Riemannian metric tensor on M, i.e., is a non-- so that is anti-symmetric in the first and the third variables. degenerate [1] symmetric (2, 0)- tensor, or when is On the other hand symplectic form on M, i.e., is a non-degenerate closed 2-form [7], [9]. If is a connection in M, i.e., a (u1 ,u2 ,u3 ) (u3 ,u2 ,u1 ) (u2 ,u3 ,u1 ) connection on the tangent bundle TM, then we have (u ,u ,u ), naturally induced connections on all tensor bundles on M, 1 3 2 all of which is denoted by the same symbol . so that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vector Bundles on Projective Space
    Vector Bundles on Projective Space Takumi Murayama December 1, 2013 1 Preliminaries on vector bundles Let X be a (quasi-projective) variety over k. We follow [Sha13, Chap. 6, x1.2]. Definition. A family of vector spaces over X is a morphism of varieties π : E ! X −1 such that for each x 2 X, the fiber Ex := π (x) is isomorphic to a vector space r 0 0 Ak(x).A morphism of a family of vector spaces π : E ! X and π : E ! X is a morphism f : E ! E0 such that the following diagram commutes: f E E0 π π0 X 0 and the map fx : Ex ! Ex is linear over k(x). f is an isomorphism if fx is an isomorphism for all x. A vector bundle is a family of vector spaces that is locally trivial, i.e., for each x 2 X, there exists a neighborhood U 3 x such that there is an isomorphism ': π−1(U) !∼ U × Ar that is an isomorphism of families of vector spaces by the following diagram: −1 ∼ r π (U) ' U × A (1.1) π pr1 U −1 where pr1 denotes the first projection. We call π (U) ! U the restriction of the vector bundle π : E ! X onto U, denoted by EjU . r is locally constant, hence is constant on every irreducible component of X. If it is constant everywhere on X, we call r the rank of the vector bundle. 1 The following lemma tells us how local trivializations of a vector bundle glue together on the entire space X.
    [Show full text]
  • Curvature Tensors in a 4D Riemann–Cartan Space: Irreducible Decompositions and Superenergy
    Curvature tensors in a 4D Riemann–Cartan space: Irreducible decompositions and superenergy Jens Boos and Friedrich W. Hehl [email protected] [email protected]"oeln.de University of Alberta University of Cologne & University of Missouri (uesday, %ugust 29, 17:0. Geometric Foundations of /ravity in (artu Institute of 0hysics, University of (artu) Estonia Geometric Foundations of /ravity Geometric Foundations of /auge Theory Geometric Foundations of /auge Theory ↔ Gravity The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: redundancy conserved e2ternal current 5 ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: Complex spinor 6eld: redundancy invariance conserved e2ternal current 5 conserved #7,8 current ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: Complex spinor 6eld: redundancy invariance conserved e2ternal current 5 conserved #7,8 current Complete, gauge-theoretical description: 9 local #7,) invariance ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: iers Complex spinor 6eld: rce carr ry of fo mic theo rrent rosco rnal cu m pic en exte att desc gredundancyiv er; N ript oet ion o conserved e2ternal current 5 invariance her f curr conserved #7,8 current e n t s Complete, gauge-theoretical description: gauge theory = complete description of matter and 9 local #7,) invariance how it interacts via gauge bosons ,3,. Curvature tensors electrodynamics :ang–Mills theory /eneral Relativity 0oincaré gauge theory *3,. Curvature tensors electrodynamics :ang–Mills theory /eneral Relativity 0oincaré gauge theory *3,. Curvature tensors electrodynamics :ang–Mills theory /eneral Relativity 0oincar; gauge theory *3,.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Non-Degenerate 2-Forms with Riemannian Metrics
    EXPOSITIONES Expo. Math. 20 (2002): 329-343 © Urban & Fischer Verlag MATHEMATICAE www.u rba nfischer.de/journals/expomath Analyzing Non-degenerate 2-Forms with Riemannian Metrics Philippe Delano~ Universit~ de Nice-Sophia Antipolis Math~matiques, Parc Valrose, F-06108 Nice Cedex 2, France Abstract. We give a variational proof of the harmonicity of a symplectic form with respect to adapted riemannian metrics, show that a non-degenerate 2-form must be K~ihlerwhenever parallel for some riemannian metric, regardless of adaptation, and discuss k/ihlerness under curvature assmnptions. Introduction In the first part of this paper, we aim at a better understanding of the following folklore result (see [14, pp. 140-141] and references therein): Theorem 1 . Let a be a non-degenerate 2-form on a manifold M and g, a riemannian metric adapted to it. If a is closed, it is co-closed for g. Let us specify at once a bit of terminology. We say a riemannian metric g is adapted to a non-degenerate 2-form a on a 2m-manifold M, if at each point Xo E M there exists a chart of M in which g(Xo) and a(Xo) read like the standard euclidean metric and symplectic form of R 2m. If, moreover, this occurs for the first jets of a (resp. a and g) and the corresponding standard structures of R 2m, the couple (~r,g) is called an almost-K~ihler (resp. a K/ihler) structure; in particular, a is then closed. Given a non-degenerate, an adapted metric g can be constructed out of any riemannian metric on M, using Cartan's polar decomposition (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES in This Section We Will Introduce The
    LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES In this section we will introduce the interesting class of fibrations given by fiber bundles. Fiber bundles play an important role in many geometric contexts. For example, the Grassmaniann varieties and certain fiber bundles associated to Stiefel varieties are central in the classification of vector bundles over (nice) spaces. The fact that fiber bundles are examples of Serre fibrations follows from Theorem ?? which states that being a Serre fibration is a local property. 1. Fiber bundles and principal bundles Definition 6.1. A fiber bundle with fiber F is a map p: E ! X with the following property: every ∼ −1 point x 2 X has a neighborhood U ⊆ X for which there is a homeomorphism φU : U × F = p (U) such that the following diagram commutes in which π1 : U × F ! U is the projection on the first factor: φ U × F U / p−1(U) ∼= π1 p * U t Remark 6.2. The projection X × F ! X is an example of a fiber bundle: it is called the trivial bundle over X with fiber F . By definition, a fiber bundle is a map which is `locally' homeomorphic to a trivial bundle. The homeomorphism φU in the definition is a local trivialization of the bundle, or a trivialization over U. Let us begin with an interesting subclass. A fiber bundle whose fiber F is a discrete space is (by definition) a covering projection (with fiber F ). For example, the exponential map R ! S1 is a covering projection with fiber Z. Suppose X is a space which is path-connected and locally simply connected (in fact, the weaker condition of being semi-locally simply connected would be enough for the following construction).
    [Show full text]
  • Proper Affine Actions and Geodesic Flows of Hyperbolic Surfaces
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS Proper affine actions and geodesic flows of hyperbolic surfaces By William M. Goldman, Franc¸ois Labourie, and Gregory Margulis SECOND SERIES, VOL. 170, NO. 3 November, 2009 anmaah Annals of Mathematics, 170 (2009), 1051–1083 Proper affine actions and geodesic flows of hyperbolic surfaces By WILLIAM M. GOLDMAN, FRANÇOIS LABOURIE, and GREGORY MARGULIS Abstract 2 Let 0 O.2; 1/ be a Schottky group, and let † H =0 be the corresponding D hyperbolic surface. Let Ꮿ.†/ denote the space of unit length geodesic currents 1 on †. The cohomology group H .0; V/ parametrizes equivalence classes of affine deformations u of 0 acting on an irreducible representation V of O.2; 1/. We 1 define a continuous biaffine map ‰ Ꮿ.†/ H .0; V/ R which is linear on 1 W ! the vector space H .0; V/. An affine deformation u acts properly if and only if ‰.; Œu/ 0 for all Ꮿ.†/. Consequently the set of proper affine actions ¤ 2 whose linear part is a Schottky group identifies with a bundle of open convex cones 1 in H .0; V/ over the Fricke-Teichmüller space of †. Introduction 1. Hyperbolic geometry 2. Affine geometry 3. Flat bundles associated to affine deformations 4. Sections and subbundles 5. Proper -actions and proper R-actions 6. Labourie’s diffusion of Margulis’s invariant 7. Nonproper deformations 8. Proper deformations References Goldman gratefully acknowledges partial support from National Science Foundation grants DMS- 0103889, DMS-0405605, DMS-070781, the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute and the Oswald Veblen Fund at the Insitute for Advanced Study, and a Semester Research Award from the General Research Board of the University of Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Spinors and Connections with Skew-Symmetric Torsion in String Theory*
    ASIAN J. MATH. © 2002 International Press Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 303-336, June 2002 005 PARALLEL SPINORS AND CONNECTIONS WITH SKEW-SYMMETRIC TORSION IN STRING THEORY* THOMAS FRIEDRICHt AND STEFAN IVANOV* Abstract. We describe all almost contact metric, almost hermitian and G2-structures admitting a connection with totally skew-symmetric torsion tensor, and prove that there exists at most one such connection. We investigate its torsion form, its Ricci tensor, the Dirac operator and the V- parallel spinors. In particular, we obtain partial solutions of the type // string equations in dimension n = 5, 6 and 7. 1. Introduction. Linear connections preserving a Riemannian metric with totally skew-symmetric torsion recently became a subject of interest in theoretical and mathematical physics. For example, the target space of supersymmetric sigma models with Wess-Zumino term carries a geometry of a metric connection with skew-symmetric torsion [23, 34, 35] (see also [42] and references therein). In supergravity theories, the geometry of the moduli space of a class of black holes is carried out by a metric connection with skew-symmetric torsion [27]. The geometry of NS-5 brane solutions of type II supergravity theories is generated by a metric connection with skew-symmetric torsion [44, 45, 43]. The existence of parallel spinors with respect to a metric connection with skew-symmetric torsion on a Riemannian spin manifold is of importance in string theory, since they are associated with some string solitons (BPS solitons) [43]. Supergravity solutions that preserve some of the supersymmetry of the underlying theory have found many applications in the exploration of perturbative and non-perturbative properties of string theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Riemannian Geometry and Multilinear Tensors with Vector Fields on Manifolds Md
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 9, September-2014 157 ISSN 2229-5518 Riemannian Geometry and Multilinear Tensors with Vector Fields on Manifolds Md. Abdul Halim Sajal Saha Md Shafiqul Islam Abstract-In the paper some aspects of Riemannian manifolds, pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, Lorentz manifolds, Riemannian metrics, affine connections, parallel transport, curvature tensors, torsion tensors, killing vector fields, conformal killing vector fields are focused. The purpose of this paper is to develop the theory of manifolds equipped with Riemannian metric. I have developed some theorems on torsion and Riemannian curvature tensors using affine connection. A Theorem 1.20 named “Fundamental Theorem of Pseudo-Riemannian Geometry” has been established on Riemannian geometry using tensors with metric. The main tools used in the theorem of pseudo Riemannian are tensors fields defined on a Riemannian manifold. Keywords: Riemannian manifolds, pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, Lorentz manifolds, Riemannian metrics, affine connections, parallel transport, curvature tensors, torsion tensors, killing vector fields, conformal killing vector fields. —————————— —————————— I. Introduction (c) { } is a family of open sets which covers , that is, 푖 = . Riemannian manifold is a pair ( , g) consisting of smooth 푈 푀 manifold and Riemannian metric g. A manifold may carry a (d) ⋃ is푈 푖푖 a homeomorphism푀 from onto an open subset of 푀 ′ further structure if it is endowed with a metric tensor, which is a 푖 . 푖 푖 휑 푈 푈 natural generation푀 of the inner product between two vectors in 푛 ℝ to an arbitrary manifold. Riemannian metrics, affine (e) Given and such that , the map = connections,푛 parallel transport, curvature tensors, torsion tensors, ( ( ) killingℝ vector fields and conformal killing vector fields play from푖 푗 ) to 푖 푗 is infinitely푖푗 −1 푈 푈 푈 ∩ 푈 ≠ ∅ 휓 important role to develop the theorem of Riemannian manifolds.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal GAGA for Good Moduli Spaces
    FORMAL GAGA FOR GOOD MODULI SPACES ANTON GERASCHENKO AND DAVID ZUREICK-BROWN Abstract. We prove formal GAGA for good moduli space morphisms under an assumption of “enough vector bundles” (which holds for instance for quotient stacks). This supports the philoso- phy that though they are non-separated, good moduli space morphisms largely behave like proper morphisms. 1. Introduction Good moduli space morphisms are a common generalization of good quotients by linearly re- ductive group schemes [GIT] and coarse moduli spaces of tame Artin stacks [AOV08, Definition 3.1]. Definition ([Alp13, Definition 4.1]). A quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphism of locally Noetherian algebraic stacks φ: X → Y is a good moduli space morphism if • (φ is Stein) the morphism OY → φ∗OX is an isomorphism, and • (φ is cohomologically affine) the functor φ∗ : QCoh(OX ) → QCoh(OY ) is exact. If φ: X → Y is such a morphism, then any morphism from X to an algebraic space factors through φ [Alp13, Theorem 6.6].1 In particular, if there exists a good moduli space morphism φ: X → X where X is an algebraic space, then X is determined up to unique isomorphism. In this case, X is said to be the good moduli space of X . If X = [U/G], this corresponds to X being a good quotient of U by G in the sense of [GIT] (e.g. for a linearly reductive G, [Spec R/G] → Spec RG is a good moduli space). In many respects, good moduli space morphisms behave like proper morphisms. They are uni- versally closed [Alp13, Theorem 4.16(ii)] and weakly separated [ASvdW10, Proposition 2.17], but since points of X can have non-proper stabilizer groups, good moduli space morphisms are gen- erally not separated (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • FOLIATIONS Introduction. the Study of Foliations on Manifolds Has a Long
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 80, Number 3, May 1974 FOLIATIONS BY H. BLAINE LAWSON, JR.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Definitions and general examples. 2. Foliations of dimension-one. 3. Higher dimensional foliations; integrability criteria. 4. Foliations of codimension-one; existence theorems. 5. Notions of equivalence; foliated cobordism groups. 6. The general theory; classifying spaces and characteristic classes for foliations. 7. Results on open manifolds; the classification theory of Gromov-Haefliger-Phillips. 8. Results on closed manifolds; questions of compact leaves and stability. Introduction. The study of foliations on manifolds has a long history in mathematics, even though it did not emerge as a distinct field until the appearance in the 1940's of the work of Ehresmann and Reeb. Since that time, the subject has enjoyed a rapid development, and, at the moment, it is the focus of a great deal of research activity. The purpose of this article is to provide an introduction to the subject and present a picture of the field as it is currently evolving. The treatment will by no means be exhaustive. My original objective was merely to summarize some recent developments in the specialized study of codimension-one foliations on compact manifolds. However, somewhere in the writing I succumbed to the temptation to continue on to interesting, related topics. The end product is essentially a general survey of new results in the field with, of course, the customary bias for areas of personal interest to the author. Since such articles are not written for the specialist, I have spent some time in introducing and motivating the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Control of Mechanical Systems Modeling, Analysis, and Design for Simple Mechanical Control Systems
    Francesco Bullo and Andrew D. Lewis Geometric Control of Mechanical Systems Modeling, Analysis, and Design for Simple Mechanical Control Systems – Supplementary Material – August 1, 2014 Contents S1 Tangent and cotangent bundle geometry ................. S1 S1.1 Some things Hamiltonian.......................... ..... S1 S1.1.1 Differential forms............................. .. S1 S1.1.2 Symplectic manifolds .......................... S5 S1.1.3 Hamiltonian vector fields ....................... S6 S1.2 Tangent and cotangent lifts of vector fields .......... ..... S7 S1.2.1 More about the tangent lift ...................... S7 S1.2.2 The cotangent lift of a vector field ................ S8 S1.2.3 Joint properties of the tangent and cotangent lift . S9 S1.2.4 The cotangent lift of the vertical lift ............ S11 S1.2.5 The canonical involution of TTQ ................. S12 S1.2.6 The canonical endomorphism of the tangent bundle . S13 S1.3 Ehresmann connections induced by an affine connection . S13 S1.3.1 Motivating remarks............................ S13 S1.3.2 More about vector and fiber bundles .............. S15 S1.3.3 Ehresmann connections ......................... S17 S1.3.4 Linear connections and linear vector fields on vector bundles ....................................... S18 S1.3.5 The Ehresmann connection on πTM : TM M associated with a second-order vector field→ on TM . S20 S1.3.6 The Ehresmann connection on πTQ : TQ Q associated with an affine connection on Q→.......... S21 ∗ S1.3.7 The Ehresmann connection on πT∗Q : T Q Q associated with an affine connection on Q ..........→ S23 S1.3.8 The Ehresmann connection on πTTQ : TTQ TQ associated with an affine connection on Q ..........→ S23 ∗ S1.3.9 The Ehresmann connection on πT∗TQ : T TQ TQ associated with an affine connection on Q ..........→ S25 ∗ S1.3.10 Representations of ST and ST ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Math 704: Part 1: Principal Bundles and Connections
    MATH 704: PART 1: PRINCIPAL BUNDLES AND CONNECTIONS WEIMIN CHEN Contents 1. Lie Groups 1 2. Principal Bundles 3 3. Connections and curvature 6 4. Covariant derivatives 12 References 13 1. Lie Groups A Lie group G is a smooth manifold such that the multiplication map G × G ! G, (g; h) 7! gh, and the inverse map G ! G, g 7! g−1, are smooth maps. A Lie subgroup H of G is a subgroup of G which is at the same time an embedded submanifold. A Lie group homomorphism is a group homomorphism which is a smooth map between the Lie groups. The Lie algebra, denoted by Lie(G), of a Lie group G consists of the set of left-invariant vector fields on G, i.e., Lie(G) = fX 2 X (G)j(Lg)∗X = Xg, where Lg : G ! G is the left translation Lg(h) = gh. As a vector space, Lie(G) is naturally identified with the tangent space TeG via X 7! X(e). A Lie group homomorphism naturally induces a Lie algebra homomorphism between the associated Lie algebras. Finally, the universal cover of a connected Lie group is naturally a Lie group, which is in one to one correspondence with the corresponding Lie algebras. Example 1.1. Here are some important Lie groups in geometry and topology. • GL(n; R), GL(n; C), where GL(n; C) can be naturally identified as a Lie sub- group of GL(2n; R). • SL(n; R), O(n), SO(n) = O(n) \ SL(n; R), Lie subgroups of GL(n; R).
    [Show full text]
  • Minimal and Totally Geodesic Unit Sections of the Unit Sphere Bundles
    Вiсник Харкiвського нацiонального унiверситету iменi В.Н. Каразiна Серiя "Математика, прикладна математика i механiка" УДК 514 № 1030, 2012, с.54–70 Minimal and totally geodesic unit sections of the unit sphere bundles. A. Yampolsky Харкiвський нацiональный унiверситет механiко-математичний факультет, кафедра геометрiї, майдан Свободи, 4, 61022, Харкiв, Україна [email protected] We consider a real vector bundle E of rank p and a unit sphere bundle E1 ⊂ E n over the Riemannian M with the Sasaki-type metric. A unit section of E1 gives rise to a submanifold in E1. We give some examples of local minimal unit sections and present a complete description of local totally geodesic unit sections of E1 in the simplest non-trivial case p = 2 and n = 2. Keywords: Sasaki metric, unit sphere bundle, totally geodesic unit section. Ямпольський О. Л., Мiнiмальнi i цiлком геодезичнi одиничнi перерiзи сферичних розшарувань. Ми розглядаємо векторне розшарування E рангу p та одиничне розшарування E1 ⊂ E над рiмановим многовидом M n з метрикою Сасакi. Ми наводимо приклади мiнiмальних перерiзiв i надаємо повне вирiшення задачi про цiлком геодезичнi перерiзи E1 у найпростiшому нетривiальному випадку, коли p = 2 i n = 2. Ключовi слова: метрика Сасакi, одиничне розшарування, цiлком геодезичний одиничний перерiз. Ямпольский А. Л., Минимальные и вполне геодезические сечения единичных сферических расслоений. Мы рассматриваем вещественное векторное расслоение E ранга p и единичное расслоение n E1 над римановым многообразием M с метрикой Сасаки. Мы приводим примеры локальных минимальных единичных сечений и даем полное решение задачи существования локальных вполне геодезических сечений E1 в простейшем нетривиальном случае, когда p = 2 и n = 2. Ключевые слова: метрика Сасаки, сферическое расслоение, вполне геодезическое единичное сечение.
    [Show full text]