FAQ-Secondary Market Department
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Analysis of Securitized Asset Liquidity June 2017 an He and Bruce Mizrach1
Analysis of Securitized Asset Liquidity June 2017 An He and Bruce Mizrach1 1. Introduction This research note extends our prior analysis2 of corporate bond liquidity to the structured products markets. We analyze data from the TRACE3 system, which began collecting secondary market trading activity on structured products in 2011. We explore two general categories of structured products: (1) real estate securities, including mortgage-backed securities in residential housing (MBS) and commercial building (CMBS), collateralized mortgage products (CMO) and to-be-announced forward mortgages (TBA); and (2) asset-backed securities (ABS) in credit cards, autos, student loans and other miscellaneous categories. Consistent with others,4 we find that the new issue market for securitized assets decreased sharply after the financial crisis and has not yet rebounded to pre-crisis levels. Issuance is below 2007 levels in CMBS, CMOs and ABS. MBS issuance had recovered by 2012 but has declined over the last four years. By contrast, 2016 issuance in the corporate bond market was at a record high for the fifth consecutive year, exceeding $1.5 trillion. Consistent with the new issue volume decline, the median age of securities being traded in non-agency CMO are more than ten years old. In student loans, the average security is over seven years old. Over the last four years, secondary market trading volumes in CMOs and TBA are down from 14 to 27%. Overall ABS volumes are down 16%. Student loan and other miscellaneous ABS declines balance increases in automobiles and credit cards. By contrast, daily trading volume in the most active corporate bonds is up nearly 28%. -
Mirae Asset NYSE FANG+ ETF an Open Ended Scheme Replicating/Tracking NYSE FANG+ Total Return Index
SCHEME INFORMATION DOCUMENT Mirae Asset NYSE FANG+ ETF An open ended scheme replicating/tracking NYSE FANG+ Total Return Index Offer for Sale of Units at 1/10,000th value of the NYSE FANG+ closing Index (Converted to INR) as on the date of allotment for applications received during the New Fund Offer (“NFO”) period and at order execution based prices (along with applicable charges and execution variations) during the Ongoing Offer for applications directly received at AMC. New Fund Offer opens on :19/04/2021 New Fund Offer closes on : 30/04/2021 Scheme re-opens for continuous Sale and Repurchase from 07/05/2021 The subscription list may be closed earlier by giving at least one day’s notice in one daily newspaper. The Trustee reserves the right to extend the closing date of the New Fund Offer Period, subject to the condition that the subscription list of the New Fund Offer Period shall not be kept open for more than 15 days. The units of the Scheme are listed on the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) and BSE Limited (BSE). All investors including Authorized Participants and Large Investors can subscribe (buy) / redeem (sell) units on a continuous basis on the NSE/BSE on which the Units are listed during the trading hours on all the trading days. In addition, Authorized Participants and Large Investors can directly subscribe to / redeem units of the Scheme on all Business Days with the Fund in ‘Creation Unit Size’ at order execution based prices (along with applicable charges and execution variations). -
Initial Public Offerings
November 2017 Initial Public Offerings An Issuer’s Guide (US Edition) Contents INTRODUCTION 1 What Are the Potential Benefits of Conducting an IPO? 1 What Are the Potential Costs and Other Potential Downsides of Conducting an IPO? 1 Is Your Company Ready for an IPO? 2 GETTING READY 3 Are Changes Needed in the Company’s Capital Structure or Relationships with Its Key Stockholders or Other Related Parties? 3 What Is the Right Corporate Governance Structure for the Company Post-IPO? 5 Are the Company’s Existing Financial Statements Suitable? 6 Are the Company’s Pre-IPO Equity Awards Problematic? 6 How Should Investor Relations Be Handled? 7 Which Securities Exchange to List On? 8 OFFER STRUCTURE 9 Offer Size 9 Primary vs. Secondary Shares 9 Allocation—Institutional vs. Retail 9 KEY DOCUMENTS 11 Registration Statement 11 Form 8-A – Exchange Act Registration Statement 19 Underwriting Agreement 20 Lock-Up Agreements 21 Legal Opinions and Negative Assurance Letters 22 Comfort Letters 22 Engagement Letter with the Underwriters 23 KEY PARTIES 24 Issuer 24 Selling Stockholders 24 Management of the Issuer 24 Auditors 24 Underwriters 24 Legal Advisers 25 Other Parties 25 i Initial Public Offerings THE IPO PROCESS 26 Organizational or “Kick-Off” Meeting 26 The Due Diligence Review 26 Drafting Responsibility and Drafting Sessions 27 Filing with the SEC, FINRA, a Securities Exchange and the State Securities Commissions 27 SEC Review 29 Book-Building and Roadshow 30 Price Determination 30 Allocation and Settlement or Closing 31 Publicity Considerations -
Secondary Market Trading Infrastructure of Government Securities
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Balogh, Csaba; Kóczán, Gergely Working Paper Secondary market trading infrastructure of government securities MNB Occasional Papers, No. 74 Provided in Cooperation with: Magyar Nemzeti Bank, The Central Bank of Hungary, Budapest Suggested Citation: Balogh, Csaba; Kóczán, Gergely (2009) : Secondary market trading infrastructure of government securities, MNB Occasional Papers, No. 74, Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Budapest This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/83554 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu MNB Occasional Papers 74. 2009 CSABA BALOGH–GERGELY KÓCZÁN Secondary market trading infrastructure of government securities Secondary market trading infrastructure of government securities June 2009 The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official view of the central bank of Hungary (Magyar Nemzeti Bank). -
Massive Delisting on the Prague Stock Exchange
CAN THE MARKET FIX A WRONG ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION? MASSIVE DELISTING ON THE PRAGUE STOCK EXCHANGE Zuzana Fungáčová CERGE-EI Charles University Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Economics Institute WORKING PAPER SERIES (ISSN 1211-3298) Electronic Version 335 Working Paper Series 335 (ISSN 1211-3298) Can the Market Fix a Wrong Administrative Decision? Massive Delisting on the Prague Stock Exchange Zuzana Fungáčová CERGE-EI Prague, August 2007 ISBN 978-80-7343-134-1 (Univerzita Karlova. Centrum pro ekonomický výzkum a doktorské studium) ISBN 978-80-7344-123-4 (Národohospodářský ústav AV ČR, v.v.i.) Can the Market Fix a Wrong Administrative Decision? Massive Delisting on the Prague Stock Exchange Zuzana Fungáčová* CERGE-EI† Abstract This research contributes to the investigation of the emerging stock markets in transition economies, namely in the Czech Republic. We estimate the impact of the various determinants of shares delisting e.g. exclusion from public trading on the Prague Stock Exchange (PSE) during the period 1993 – 2004. Unlike its counterparts in Poland or Hungary, exceptionally large amounts of shares were delisted from the PSE. Using the data on listed and delisted companies we show that the pre-privatization and privatization characteristics of the companies were decisive for delisting. This further indicates that it would have been possible to prevent massive delisting if these factors had been taken into account when deciding which companies to place on the stock exchange for public trading. Moreover, therefore companies that were not suitable for public trading were also not suitable for voucher privatization. -
Capital Market Theory, Mandatory Disclosure, and Price Discovery Lawrence A
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 51 | Issue 3 Article 3 Summer 6-1-1994 Capital Market Theory, Mandatory Disclosure, and Price Discovery Lawrence A. Cunningham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Lawrence A. Cunningham, Capital Market Theory, Mandatory Disclosure, and Price Discovery, 51 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 843 (1994), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol51/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Capital Market Theory, Mandatory Disclosure, and Price Discovery Lawrence A. Cunningham* L Introduction The once-venerable "efficient capital market hypothesis" (ECMH) crashed along with world capital markets in October 1987, but its resilience has nearly matched the resilience of those markets. Despite another market break in 1989, for example, the ECMH has continued to be reflexively heralded by numerous corporate and securities law scholars as an accurate account of public capital market behavior. Together with overwhelming evidence of excessive market volatility, however, these catastrophic market breaks revealed instinct infirmities m the ECMH that could hardly be shrugged off as mere anomalies. In response to the ECMH's eroding descriptive and prescriptive power, capital market theorists found in noise theory an auxiliary explanation for these otherwise inexplicable catastrophes. -
Research Communication PUBLIC AWARENESS TOWARDS CAPITAL
ISSN 2394-2762(Print) e-ISSN 2394-2770(Online) Research Communication PUBLIC AWARENESS TOWARDS CAPITAL MARKET INVESTMENT WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO JRF SECURITIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD *Dr. R. Ganapathi *Corresponding author: Assistant Professor, Directorate of Distance Education, Alagappa University Karaikudi. Pin Code – 630 004. (Tamil Nadu) E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] Abstract: The growth of the capital market has acquired momentum in the Indian sub-continent for the past 3 decades. The present work highlights the salient features of the capital market investment. It gives much importance to the awareness of the public towards capital market investment with special reference to JRF securities of Hyderabad. One of the objectives of the study identifies the key factors influencing the investment decision of the people. The study is based on both primary and secondary data. The researcher selected 150 investors and from them collected needed information by a questionnaire. Though the study was limited to Hyderabad city only the study did definitely yield the expected results. The researcher has given a number of suggestions towards the end which will open new / vistas for future study. Introduction The main components of capital market are securities market and financial intermediaries. A formal capital market was present in our country from early 1900’s but remained very inactive at that time. The inactiveness of capital market has continued even after independence. The growth of capital market has acquired momentum only from mid-eighties. Till then debt instruments were more popular and the investors have not shown much interest in direct investment. Besides the Government’s policy towards promotion of capital market was also not much encouraging. -
Navigating the Municipal Securities Market Website
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION COMMISSION EXCHANGE AND SECURITIES U.S. The Securities and Exchange Commission, as a matter of policy, disclaims responsibility for any private publication or statement by any of its employees. The views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of the SEC, its Commissioners, or other members of the SEC’s staff. U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WHO WE ARE: MUNICIPAL SECURITIES MARKET REGULATORS SEC • Rules • Industry oversight • Enforcement • Examination IRS • Enforcement • Rules • Education • Market Leadership • Examination • Enforcement State Regulators • Examination • Examination • Enforcement • Enforcement (Broker-dealers) U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 2 • Primary Market Regulation Securities Act of 1933 What is the Legal Framework• Section 17(a) Anti-fraud for • Establishes the SEC Municipal Securities• Secondary? Market Regulation Securities Exchange Act • Section 10(b) Anti-fraud of 1934 • Rule 10b-5 • Section 15B Municipal Securities • Rule 15c2-12 Securities Acts • Establishes the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Amendments of 1975 Board (“MSRB”) • Prohibits the SEC and MSRB from requiring issuers Tower Amendment to register offerings and prohibits the MSRB from requiring issuer filings • Expands the SEC and MSRB’s jurisdiction and Dodd-Frank Act mission U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 3 WHY ARE WE HERE TODAY? To Bridge The Gap Between Officials In Municipalities That Infrequently Access The Municipal Bond Markets And to Provide Them With The Information They Need To Know Before Entering Into the Bond Market. We will cover: § Options for entering the bond market § Putting together your financial team § How to avoid fraud and abuse § Best practices U.S. -
The Professional Obligations of Securities Brokers Under Federal Law: an Antidote for Bubbles?
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law LAW eCommons Faculty Publications & Other Works 2002 The rP ofessional Obligations of Securities Brokers Under Federal Law: An Antidote for Bubbles? Steven A. Ramirez Loyola University Chicago, School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs Part of the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Ramirez, Steven, The rP ofessional Obligations of Securities Brokers Under Federal Law: An Antidote for Bubbles? 70 U. Cin. L. Rev. 527 (2002) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PROFESSIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF SECURITIES BROKERS UNDER FEDERAL LAW: AN ANTIDOTE FOR BUBBLES? Steven A. Ramirez* I. INTRODUCTION In the wake of the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed legislation specifically designed to extend greater protection to the investing public and to elevate business practices within the securities brokerage industry.' This legislative initiative ultimately gave birth to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the '34 Act).' The '34 Act represented the first large scale regulation of the nation's public securities markets. Up until that time, the securities brokerage industry4 had been left to regulate itself (through various private stock exchanges). This system of * Professor of Law, Washburn University School of Law. Professor William Rich caused me to write this Article by arranging a Faculty Scholarship Forum at Washburn University in the'Spring of 2001 and asking me to participate. -
Speculation in the United States Government Securities Market
Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 2/25/2020 Se t m e 1, 958 p e b r 1 1 To Members of the Federal Open Market Committee and Presidents of Federal Reserve Banks not presently serving on the Federal Open Market Committee From R. G. Rouse, Manager, System Open Market Account Attached for your information is a copy of a confidential memorandum we have prepared at this Bank on speculation in the United States Government securities market. Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 2/25/2020 C O N F I D E N T I AL -- (F.R.) SPECULATION IN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SECURITIES MARKET 1957 - 1958* MARKET DEVELOPMENTS Starting late in 1957 and carrying through the middle of August 1958, the United States Government securities market was subjected to a vast amount of speculative buying and liquidation. This speculation was damaging to mar- ket confidence,to the Treasury's debt management operations, and to the Federal Reserve System's open market operations. The experience warrants close scrutiny by all interested parties with a view to developing means of preventing recurrences. The following history of market events is presented in some detail to show fully the significance and continuous effects of the situation as it unfolded. With the decline in business activity and the emergence of easier Federal Reserve credit and monetary policy in October and November 1957, most market elements expected lower interest rates and higher prices for United States Government securities. There was a rapid market adjustment to these expectations. -
SEBI-Annual-Report-2017-18
ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18 This Report is in conformity with the format as per the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Annual Report) Rules, 1994, notified in Official Gazette on April 7, 1994 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD (As on March 31, 2018) Appointed under Section 4(1)(a) of the SEBI Act, 1992 (15 of 1992) AJAY TYAGI CHAIRMAN Appointed under Section 4(1)(d) of the SEBI Act, 1992 (15 of 1992) G. MAHALINGAM WHOLE TIME MEMBER MADHABI PURI BUCH WHOLE TIME MEMBER ARUN P. SATHE PART TIME MEMBER Nominated under Section 4(1)(b) of the SEBI Act, 1992 (15 of 1992) SUBHASH CHANDRA GARG Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Aairs, Government of India INJETI SRINIVAS Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Aairs, Government of India Nominated under Section 4(1)(c) of the SEBI Act, 1992 (15 of 1992) N. S. VISHWANATHAN Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India MEMBERS OF THE BOARD AJAY TYAGI Chairman G. MAHALINGAM MADHABI PURI BUCH ARUN P. SATHE Whole Time Member Whole Time Member Part Time Member SUBHASH CHANDRA GARG INJETI SRINIVAS N. S. VISHWANATHAN Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Deputy Governor, Department of Economic Aairs, Aairs, Government of India Reserve Bank of India Government of India Chairman, Whole Time Members and Executive Directors (Left to Right) Sitting: Shri G. Mahalingam, Whole Time Member; Shri Ajay Tyagi, Chairman; Ms. Madhabi Puri Buch, Whole Time Member Standing: Shri S. Ravindran, Executive Director; Shri Nagendraa Parakh, Executive Director; Shri Ananta Barua, Executive Director; Shri S K Mohanty, Executive Director; Shri SVMD Rao, Executive Director; Shri Sujit Prasad, Executive Director; Shri P. -
An Observational Study on Financial Jungle with Sharekhan As Your Guide
SUMMER TRAINING PROJECT REPORT SHAREKHAN LTD. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement of Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) Guru Jambeshwar University, Hissar AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY ON FINANCIAL JUNGLE WITH SHAREKHAN AS YOUR GUIDE Training Supervisor Submitted By: MR. RAVI VERMA ANUJ DIWAKAR (AREA ASSISTANT MANAGER) (2007-2010) ROLL NO: 07511242131 Session (2007-2010) GURU JAMBESHWAR UNIVERSITY HISSAR-125001 PREFACE No professional curriculum is considered complete without work experience. It is well evident that work experience is an indispensable part of every professional course. In the same manner practical work in any organization is must for each an every individual, who is undergoing management course. Without the practical exposure one cannot consider himself as a qualified capable manager. Entering in the organization is like stepping into altogether a new world. At first, everything seems strange and unheard but as the time passes one can understand the concept and working of the organization thereby develop professional relationship. Initially I felt that as if classroom study was irrelevant and it is useless in any working concern. But gradually I realized that all fundamental basic concepts studied are linked in one or in another way to the organization. But how and what can be done with fundamentals, depend upon the intellectual and applicability skills of an individual. During my summer training, a specific customer survey was assigned to me which helped me to have a full market exposure. This project helped me to understand and cope up with different types of people and there diversified opinions or needs. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The completion of my summer training and project would not have been possible without the constant and timely encouragement of MR.