Strategies of Remembering In

GREECE UNDER ROME (100 BC - 100 AD) GREECE UNDER IN REMEMBERING OF STRATEGIES STRATEGIES OF REMEMBERING IN GREECE UNDER ROME (100 BC - 100 AD) At the beginning of the first century BC Athens was an independent city bound to Rome through a friendship alliance. By the end of the first century AD the city had been incorporated into the Roman province of Achaea. Along with Athenian independence perished the notion of Greek self-rule. The rest of Achaea was ruled by the governor of Macedonia already since 146 BC, but the numerous defections of Greek cities during the first century BC show that Roman rule was not yet viewed as inevitable. In spite of the definitive loss of self-rule this was not a period of decline. Attica and the Peloponnese were special regions because of their legacy as cultural and religious centres of the Mediterranean. Supported by this legacy communities and individuals engaged actively with the increasing presence of Roman rule and its representatives. The archaeological and epigraphic records attest to the continued economic vitality of the region: buildings, statues, and lavish tombs were still being constructed. There is hence need to counterbalance the traditional discourses of weakness on Roman Greece, and to highlight how acts of remembering were employed as resources in this complex political situation. The legacy of Greece defined Greek and Roman responses to the changing relationship. Both parties looked to the past in shaping their interactions, but how this was done varied widely. Sulla fashioned himself after the tyrant-slayers Harmodius and Aristogeiton, while Athenian ephebes evoked the sea-battles of the Persian Wars to fashion their valour. This interdisciplinary volume traces strategies of remembering in city building, funerary culture, festival and association, honorific practices, Greek literature, and political ideology. The variety of these strategies attests to the vitality of the region. In STRATEGIES OF REMEMBERING times of transition the past cannot be ignored: actors use what came before, in diverse and complex ways, in order to build the present. IN GREECE UNDER ROME (100 BC - 100 AD) VI edited by Tamara M. Dijkstra, Inger N.I. Kuin, ISBN 978-90-8890-480-6 Sidestone Press Sidestone Muriel Moser & David Weidgenannt ISBN: 978-90-8890-480-6 PUBLICATIONS OF THE PUBLICATIONS OF THE NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE AT ATHENS VI 9 789088 904806 NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE AT ATHENS VI Source reference: Dijkstra, T.M., I.N.I. Kuin, M. Moser & D. Weidgenannt (eds) 2017: Strategies of Remembering in Greece under Rome (100 BC - 100 AD), Publications of the Netherlands Institute at Athens VI, Leiden (Sidestone Press). SIDESTONE PRESS This is a free offprint – as with all our publications the entire book is freely accessible on our website, where you can also buy a printed copy or pdf E-book. WWW.SIDESTONE.COM STRATEGIES OF REMEMBERING IN GREECE UNDER ROME (100 BC - 100 AD) edited by Tamara M. Dijkstra, Inger N.I. Kuin, Muriel Moser & David Weidgenannt PUBLICATIONS OF THE NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE AT ATHENS VI © 2017 The individual authors Published by Sidestone Press, Leiden www.sidestone.com Publications of the Netherlands Institute at Athens VI Co-financed by the SFB 1095 “Discources of Weakness and Resource Regimes” of the Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft Imprint: Sidestone Press Lay-out & cover design: Sidestone Press Photograph cover: Akropolis, photo: byrefresh(PIX) (stock.adobe.com) ISBN 978-90-8890-480-6 (softcover) ISBN 978-90-8890-481-3 (hardcover) ISBN 978-90-8890-482-0 (PDF e-book) Contents Contents 5 About the editors 7 List of contributors 9 Preface: Relaunching the Publications of the Netherlands Institute at Athens Series 11 Introduction 13 Tamara M. Dijkstra, Inger N.I. Kuin, Muriel Moser, and David Weidgenannt Part I: Building Remembrance Roman Greece and the ‘Mnemonic Turn’. Some Critical Remarks 21 Dimitris Grigoropoulos, Valentina Di Napoli, Vasilis Evangelidis, Francesco Camia, Dylan Rogers and Stavros Vlizos Strategies of Remembering in the Creation of a Colonial Society in Patras 37 Tamara M. Dijkstra Contending with the Past in Roman Corinth: The Julian Basilica 49 Catherine de Grazia Vanderpool and Paul D. Scotton Part II: Competing with the Past Heritage Societies? Private Associations in Roman Greece 71 Benedikt Eckhardt Performing the Past: Salamis, Naval Contests and the Athenian Ephebeia 83 Zahra Newby Greek Panhellenic Agones in a Roman Colony: Corinth and the Return of the Isthmian Games 97 Lavinia del Basso Part III: Honoring Tradition Heroes of Their Times. Intra-Mural Burials in the Urban Memorial Landscapes of the Roman Peloponnese 111 Johannes Fouquet Public Statues as a Strategy of Remembering in Early Imperial Messene 125 Christopher Dickenson Shortages, Remembering and the Construction of Time: Aspects of Greek Honorific Culture (2nd century BC – 1st century AD) 143 David Weidgenannt Part IV: History in Athens Anchoring Political Change in Post-Sullan Athens 157 Inger N.I. Kuin Reused Statues for Roman Friends: The Past as a Political Resource in Roman Athens 169 Muriel Moser Strategies of Remembering in Greece under Rome: Some Conclusions 183 Inger N.I. Kuin and Muriel Moser Index 187 Reused Statues for Roman Friends: The Past as a Political Resource in Roman Athens Muriel Moser Abstract A number of public honorific monuments dedicated by the Athenian demos to Roman politicians between the sack of Sulla and the reign of Nero consisted of old, reused statue monuments. This article explores the history of these statues by looking at the role they played in the relationship between Athens and Rome and in inner-Athenian debates about the management of the public space on the Acropolis, where these reused monuments were located. I hence explore the political strategies that were pursued in this manipulation of the Athenian past. The first part of the article locates the statues in the context of the relation between Athens and Rome. I argue that the Athenian polity used old statue monuments as a means of gaining support and favour from Roman politicians. The second section then considers the reused statues as an expression of the assertion of democratic control over public space. Keywords: Athens, Roman empire, political resources, honorific statues, Greek polis 1. Introduction Athens’ position was a difficult one in the last decades of the 1st century BC. Financially, the city suffered from the disruptions caused by the sack of Sulla. Her situation was also complex in political terms following the Roman civil wars: the city had supported several Roman generals who had been unable to assert their authority in Rome, including Marc Antony in his battle against Augustus (Tac. Ann. 2.55). As a result, it was necessary to secure powerful friends in Rome willing to assist the city with financial and political support. Due to several regime changes, there was also need for political stability and a strong political authority within the city. The present article discusses one key strategy that was used by Athens in this context: the reuse of old statue monuments. Between the mid-1st century BC and the mid-1st century AD, 21 statue monuments set up in Classical or Hellenistic times on the Athenian Acropolis were being rededicated to foreign benefactors, in particular Roman politi- in: Dijkstra, T.M., I.N.I. Kuin, M. Moser & D. Weidgenannt (eds) 2017. Strategies of Remembering in Greece under Rome (100 BC - 100 AD), Leiden (Sidestone Press). 169 cians.1 Their reuse, which peaked under Augustus, has and Cic. Att. 6.1.46 which are often cited in this context). been interpreted as evidence for the weakness of Athens These old statues were rededicated to some of the most under Rome or as an attempt to preserve the Greek aspect influential men in Rome, including the grandfather of of her Acropolis.2 Some of such readings were heavily Nero and Augustus’ son in law.5 This means that unless we influenced by a speech by Dio Chrysostom (Dio Chrys. want to concede that the Athenians wanted to jeopardize Or. 31), who criticizes the cheapening of public honours their relationship with these men by honouring them with through the reuse of honorific statues in Roman Rhodes, cheap, old statues, there must be some grounded explana- as well as by an inscription from Roman Lindos (I.Lindos tion to account for the award of old statues to the most II, no. 419) which documents the auction of old statues powerful senators in Rome. in the sanctuary. It is also informed by the traditional As I show in what follows, a careful reuse of old view of Athens as a weak city under Roman rule engaged statues by the Athenian demos allowed manipulating in (cultural) resistance against Roman dominance these survivals of the past as a means to represent new (e.g. Graindor 1927; Day 1942; Touloumakos 1967; Roman honorands as dynamic, resourceful supporters of Bernhardt 1985, 39-49; Deininger 1971, esp. 242-261; Athens. They were hence perfectly suited to function as Geagan 1997; Spawforth 2012). prestigeous honours to ask for support and favour from A closer analysis of the material quickly reveals that influential Roman politicians. The second part of the the reuse cannot be explained only with reference to lack article proposes to consider the statues in polis culture and of time, power or financial means: the 21 preserved reused society. I argue that the reuse of statues enabled political monuments constituted only 13% of the monuments dynamism in Athens: in the process the Athenian demos dedicated to Romans on the Acropolis in this period; asserted its agency in the relationship with Rome, while at 87% were new monuments made for the occasion.3 It also the same time also establishing its authority over public remains to be proven that old statues were better suited space on the memory-charged Acropolis.

Load more