2598 AJR Journal October 2011.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2598 AJR Journal October 2011.Indd VOLUMEAJR JOURNAL11 NO.10 OCTOBERBER 2011 The Habsburg twilight rchduke Otto von Habsburg, son Balkans obliged it to form an alliance with disintegrating into its national component of the last emperor of Austria- Bismarck’s Germany, and it was as the parts under the enormous strain of the A Hungary, died on 4 July 2011, at junior partner in that alliance that Austria war. For Austria-Hungary had become the age of 98. His passing broke the last entered the First World War, which was totally dependent on her German ally; living link with the Habsburg monarchy, to lead to the disintegration of the Austro- whether she lived or died would ultimately which had ruled Austria from 1278, when Hungarian Empire in 1918. be determined by the success of German Rudolf I defeated Ottokar II of Bohemia at In the Austro-Hungarian Empire, or arms on the battlefield. the Battle on the Marchfeld and assumed Dual Monarchy, that emerged in 1867, By 1916, Austria’s military weakness control of the Duchies of Austria, Styria the emperor (Kaiser) of Austria was also had become only too apparent. The and Carinthia, until 1918. The Habsburgs king (König) of Hungary; hence the title inability of her forces to resist the Russian were one of the great dynasties of Europe, armies without German support had an imperial house more ancient and been demonstrated early on, when the historic, one might argue, than the upstart Russians drove far into Galicia, capturing Hohenzollerns, who had been mere the key Austrian fortress of Przemysl; kings of Prussia and had only attained and the Austrian armies were further the dignity of German emperors in 1871. humiliated by their failure to overcome Amazingly, Otto von Habsburg had the resistance of Serbia, which collapsed as a boy shaken the hand of his great- only when Bulgarian forces invaded the great-uncle, the Emperor Franz Joseph. country from the east. Only on the Italian For Franz Joseph was born in 1830 and front did the Austrians hold their own, and had ascended to the imperial throne in even then they needed German backing 1848, after the revolution that had swept to achieve the victory of Caporetto (1917). away Chancellor Metternich and the The German army’s opinion of its ally was mentally unfit Emperor Ferdinand. But if expressed succinctly in the phrase ‘We Otto von Habsburg was a living link to a are fettered to a corpse.’ Internally, the past that extended back into the first half national and social conflicts besetting the of the nineteenth century, it was a past Otto von Habsburg, 1912-2011 empire had hollowed out such cohesion overshadowed by the twilight melancholy ‘kaiserlich und königlich’, or ‘k. und k.’, as it still possessed, bringing the spectre of apparently unstoppable decline. The that was regularly bestowed on the Habs- of its collapse ever closer. Austrian monarchy that had emerged burg administration, its institutions and In this extreme situation, Karl, a decent from the convulsions of 1848, having officials. This in turn gave rise to the and (by Habsburg standards) progressive crushed the uprisings in Hungary and imagi nary realm of Kakanien, a term man, sought, in the words of his accession northern Italy as well as the popular coined in Robert Musil’s novel Der Mann manifesto, ‘to win back for my peoples movement in Vienna, seemed to be ohne Eigenschaften (The Man without the sorely missed blessings of peace’; his strong enough to act as the great power in Qualities), a state administered through efforts to achieve peace earned him the Central Europe and among the German an impenetrably hierarchical and immo- title ‘Friedenskaiser’ (‘Friede’ meaning states; in 1850, under Schwarzenberg, bile bureaucracy. It was this lumbering ‘peace’). Karl was married to Princess Zita Metternich’s successor, Austria was able imperial monolith, incapable of resolving of Bourbon-Parma, and it was her elder to impose its will on Prussia, dictating either the national conflicts or the social brother, Prince Sixtus, a French national, terms to its German rival under the tensions that beset it, that in 1914 lurched that the emperor attempted to use in Punctation of Olmütz. into the conflagration that destroyed it. 1917 as an intermediary to initiate peace But appearances were deceptive. In A particularly sad figure in the final negotiations with the Allies, in the famous 1859, Austria was defeated by France act of this drama was the last emperor, ‘Sixtus Affair’. But the plan had little in the war in Italy, the first in a series of Karl I, great-nephew of the aged Franz chance of success in the face of French defeats and setbacks that dogged Franz Joseph and father of Otto von Habsburg. and Italian opposition, even though the Joseph throughout his reign. Defeat by When he succeeded Franz Joseph in British prime minister, Lloyd George, France was followed in 1866 by defeat November 1916, the 29-year-old Karl supported it. In the final analysis, Austria- by Prussia, which excluded Austria from faced a disastrous situation that he Hungary could not abandon Germany, Germany. By 1879, Austria’s weakness sought desperately to remedy. But he and Germany, effectively controlled by in the face of Russian ambitions in the lacked the means to prevent the empire continued overleaf 1 AJR JOURNAL OCTOBER 2011 The Habsburg twilight cont. from p1 The Ghetto Fund: A new directive its military leaders, Hindenburg and t the end of July the German the German Foundation Remembrance, Ludendorff, had no strategy other than government introduced a new Responsibility and Future are also entitled that of securing victory on the battlefield. A directive which significantly im- to apply. When US President Wilson included proves the entitlements of Holocaust Survivors who have already sub- survivors who worked in Nazi-controlled mitted an application form to the the principle of national self-determination ghettos during the Second World War. Bundesamt für zentrale Dienste und in his Fourteen Points of January 1918, Previously, former ghetto workers could offene Vermögens fragen (BADV), the the writing was on the wall for Habsburg receive either a ghetto pension (known in government department handling claims rule over its increasingly restive subject German by the acronym ZRBG) or a one- to the Ghetto Fund, do not need to submit nationalities. With the defeat of the time payment of €2,000 (approximately a new application form or to reapply, even German armies on the western front in £1,700) from the Ghetto Fund. Under if they have recently received another form autumn 1918, the Habsburg Empire lost the terms of the new directive, it is now in the post. its last underpinning. Austria-Hungary possible to receive both payments. Anyone who receives a ghetto pension disintegrated, leaving Austria as a small The Ghetto Fund was originally will automatically be sent details and an introduced in October 2007 due to long application form to claim the Ghetto Fund. rump state, and on 11 November the delays in processing applications for a The BADV can be contacted at 53221 emperor formally renounced power. ghetto pension. It was estimated that Bonn, Germany or by telephone on 0049 But this did not bring an end to Karl’s 50,000 Holocaust survivors worldwide 22899 7030 1324. The AJR can assist with imperial pretentions. In 1921, he twice were eligible to apply. Of the 70,000 claims completing and notarising these forms. attempted to seize power in Hungary, submitted for a ZRBG pension, 61,000 Claim forms and further information in somewhat bizarre bids to regain the were originally rejected. about the Ghetto Fund are also available imperial crown. The first attempt, the so- Because the Ghetto Fund provides com- at http://www.badv.bund.de/002_menue_ called ‘Easter Bid’, was thwarted when he pensation for work voluntarily performed oben/007_english/005_ghettowork/index. was outmanoeuvred in negotiations by in a ghetto, survivors who received awards html from slave labour compensation from Michael Newman the Regent of Hungary, Admiral Miklos Horthy, a former officer in the Austro- Hungarian navy, who had in November the populace added the appropriate rhyme 1918 sworn never to rest until he had ‘aber stier’ (‘but we’re broke’). ANNIVERSARY restored the emperor to his thrones in The disappearance of Austria-Hungary OF KRISTALLNACHT Vienna and Budapest. Then in October created a power vacuum in Central and Please join us for a service to 1921 the forces supporting Karl were Eastern Europe, where the small states commemorate the 73rd anniversary defeated by those loyal to Horthy in a that succeeded it fell under the sway of Kristallnacht skirmish in the suburbs of Budapest. first of Hitler, then of Stalin. It is often on Wednesday 9 November 2011 This fiasco spelt the end of Karl’s political argued that, had the Dual Monarchy at 2 pm career; a British warship conveyed him to survived, much of Europe would have at Belsize Square Synagogue Madeira, where he died in 1922. been spared the horrors visited upon it by Rabbi Stuart Altshuler will lead the The passing of the Habsburg Empire the two dictators. For the very existence memorial service and light refreshments was much mourned, not least by the of a powerful state in East Central Europe will be served at the conclusion Empire’s Jews, who knew that Franz after 1918 would have blocked Hitler’s For further details, please telephone Joseph had been sympathetic to them first extensions of German territory (into AJR Head Office on 020 8385 3070 throughout his long reign, intervening Austria and Czechoslovakia) as well as or email [email protected] to protect them from anti-Semitic actions the expansion of German influence into and refusing for two years to confirm the Eastern and South-Eastern Europe that one can argue that the monarchy, by rea- appointment of Karl Lueger, father of was so vital to the creation of a German- son of its inability to reform itself and to political anti-Semitism, as mayor of Vienna.
Recommended publications
  • From Free Cinema to British New Wave: a Story of Angry Young Men
    SUPLEMENTO Ideas, I, 1 (2020) 51 From Free Cinema to British New Wave: A Story of Angry Young Men Diego Brodersen* Introduction In February 1956, a group of young film-makers premiered a programme of three documentary films at the National Film Theatre (now the BFI Southbank). Lorenza Mazzetti, Lindsay Anderson, Karel Reisz and Tony Richardson thought at the time that “no film can be too personal”, and vehemently said so in their brief but potent manifesto about Free Cinema. Their documentaries were not only personal, but aimed to show the real working class people in Britain, blending the realistic with the poetic. Three of them would establish themselves as some of the most inventive and irreverent British filmmakers of the 60s, creating iconoclastic works –both in subject matter and in form– such as Saturday Day and Sunday Morning, The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner and If… Those were the first significant steps of a New British Cinema. They were the Big Screen’s angry young men. What is British cinema? In my opinion, it means many different things. National cinemas are much more than only one idea. I would like to begin this presentation with this question because there have been different genres and types of films in British cinema since the beginning. So, for example, there was a kind of cinema that was very successful, not only in Britain but also in America: the films of the British Empire, the films about the Empire abroad, set in faraway places like India or Egypt. Such films celebrated the glory of the British Empire when the British Empire was almost ending.
    [Show full text]
  • The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema to Access Digital Resources Including: Blog Posts Videos Online Appendices
    Robert Phillip Kolker The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/8 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. Robert Kolker is Emeritus Professor of English at the University of Maryland and Lecturer in Media Studies at the University of Virginia. His works include A Cinema of Loneliness: Penn, Stone, Kubrick, Scorsese, Spielberg Altman; Bernardo Bertolucci; Wim Wenders (with Peter Beicken); Film, Form and Culture; Media Studies: An Introduction; editor of Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho: A Casebook; Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey: New Essays and The Oxford Handbook of Film and Media Studies. http://www.virginia.edu/mediastudies/people/adjunct.html Robert Phillip Kolker THE ALTERING EYE Contemporary International Cinema Revised edition with a new preface and an updated bibliography Cambridge 2009 Published by 40 Devonshire Road, Cambridge, CB1 2BL, United Kingdom http://www.openbookpublishers.com First edition published in 1983 by Oxford University Press. © 2009 Robert Phillip Kolker Some rights are reserved. This book is made available under the Cre- ative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 2.0 UK: England & Wales Licence. This licence allows for copying any part of the work for personal and non-commercial use, providing author
    [Show full text]
  • From Real Time to Reel Time: the Films of John Schlesinger
    From Real Time to Reel Time: The Films of John Schlesinger A study of the change from objective realism to subjective reality in British cinema in the 1960s By Desmond Michael Fleming Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2011 School of Culture and Communication Faculty of Arts The University of Melbourne Produced on Archival Quality Paper Declaration This is to certify that: (i) the thesis comprises only my original work towards the PhD, (ii) due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used, (iii) the thesis is fewer than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, maps, bibliographies and appendices. Abstract The 1960s was a period of change for the British cinema, as it was for so much else. The six feature films directed by John Schlesinger in that decade stand as an exemplar of what those changes were. They also demonstrate a fundamental change in the narrative form used by mainstream cinema. Through a close analysis of these films, A Kind of Loving, Billy Liar, Darling, Far From the Madding Crowd, Midnight Cowboy and Sunday Bloody Sunday, this thesis examines the changes as they took hold in mainstream cinema. In effect, the thesis establishes that the principal mode of narrative moved from one based on objective realism in the tradition of the documentary movement to one which took a subjective mode of narrative wherein the image on the screen, and the sounds attached, were not necessarily a record of the external world. The world of memory, the subjective world of the mind, became an integral part of the narrative.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture and the Arts Issue 09 | Autumn 2009
    University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture and the Arts Issue 09 | Autumn 2009 Title ‘Whatever people say I am…’: Multiple voices on screen and page in Saturday Night and Sunday Morning. Author David Forrest Publication FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture and the Arts Issue Number 09 Issue Date Autumn 2009 Publication Date 12/12/2009 Editors Lena Wanggren & Ally Crockford FORUM claims non-exclusive rights to reproduce this article electronically (in full or in part) and to publish this work in any such media current or later developed. The author retains all rights, including the right to be identified as the author wherever and whenever this article is published, and the right to use all or part of the article and abstracts, with or without revision or modification in compilations or other publications. Any latter publication shall recognise FORUM as the original publisher. ‘Whatever people say I am…’: Multiple voices on screen and page in Saturday Night and Sunday Morning . David Forrest, University of Sheffield The British New Wave in cinema, which ran from 1958 to 1962, was built around the adaptation of a number of literary texts that derived their ‘newness’ by vocalising working-class protagonists, hitherto largely suppressed in popular visions of British society. As a knock-on-effect, British screen culture refreshed, suffering as it did from the same level of under-representation that blighted literature. In a wider context, the films’ freshness and vigour can also be seen to be identified in a new approach to film style and aesthetics which had more in common with the European art cinema than the staid traditions of British filmmaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Madness in the Films of Karel Reisz, Lindsay Anderson, Sam Peckinpah and Nicolas Roeg
    Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences (2020) Volume 10 No 4, 1413-1442 Images of Modernity: Madness in the Films of Karel Reisz, Lindsay Anderson, Sam Peckinpah and Nicolas Roeg Paul Cornelius—taught film studies and film and TV production at Mahidol University International College (Thailand), film studies and history at the University of Texas at Dallas, American studies at the University of Oldenburg (Germany), and communication arts at Southern Methodist University. Douglas Rhein—is Chair of the social science division at Mahidol University International College (Thailand), where he teaches classes in psychology and media. Abstract: This article will examine the work of four filmmakers-- Karel Reisz, Lindsay Anderson, Sam Peckinpah and Nicolas Roeg— whom have produced milestone works in the cinema that address one of the central concerns of modernity, the loss of individual identity and its replacement with a figurative disembodiment in an increasingly complex, technocratic, and specialized world. Preoccupation with the struggle for the soul and the resulting madness and the blurring and collapsing of boundaries, is what unites the four film makers. Three of the four--Reisz, Anderson and Roeg--originated in the British cinema, and thus automatically found themselves somewhat on the margins of the industry, yet the fourth, Peckinpah, is the sole American of the group. This article argues that his primary concerns in the cinema may place him more with his British counterparts than with other Hollywood filmmakers of the same era. The methodology chosen for this analysis firmly secures the films and their makers within their particular social and historical contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Shail, Robert, British Film Directors
    BRITISH FILM DIRECTORS INTERNATIONAL FILM DIRECTOrs Series Editor: Robert Shail This series of reference guides covers the key film directors of a particular nation or continent. Each volume introduces the work of 100 contemporary and historically important figures, with entries arranged in alphabetical order as an A–Z. The Introduction to each volume sets out the existing context in relation to the study of the national cinema in question, and the place of the film director within the given production/cultural context. Each entry includes both a select bibliography and a complete filmography, and an index of film titles is provided for easy cross-referencing. BRITISH FILM DIRECTORS A CRITI Robert Shail British national cinema has produced an exceptional track record of innovative, ca creative and internationally recognised filmmakers, amongst them Alfred Hitchcock, Michael Powell and David Lean. This tradition continues today with L GUIDE the work of directors as diverse as Neil Jordan, Stephen Frears, Mike Leigh and Ken Loach. This concise, authoritative volume analyses critically the work of 100 British directors, from the innovators of the silent period to contemporary auteurs. An introduction places the individual entries in context and examines the role and status of the director within British film production. Balancing academic rigour ROBE with accessibility, British Film Directors provides an indispensable reference source for film students at all levels, as well as for the general cinema enthusiast. R Key Features T SHAIL • A complete list of each director’s British feature films • Suggested further reading on each filmmaker • A comprehensive career overview, including biographical information and an assessment of the director’s current critical standing Robert Shail is a Lecturer in Film Studies at the University of Wales Lampeter.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollywood Abroad: Audiences and Cultural Exchange
    Hollywood Abroad: Audiences and Cultural Exchange By Melvyn Stokes and Richard Maltby (eds.) London, British Film Institute 2004. ISBN: 1-84457-018-5 (hbk), 1-84457-051-7 (pbk). 164 pp. £16.99 (pbk), £50 (hbk) A review by Martin Barker, University of Wales, Aberystwyth This is the fourth in a line of excellent books to have come out of two conferences held in London, on Hollywood and its audiences. This fourth collection deals specifically with the reception of Hollywood films in some very different counties and cultural contexts. The quality and the verve of the essays in here (they are all, without exception, beautifully written) is testimony to the rise and the potentials of the new historical approaches to audiences (which has, I am pleased to see, sedimented into some on-going cross-cultural research projects on local film exhibition histories). I recommend this book, unreservedly. Its contributors demonstrate so well the potential for many kinds of archival research to extend our understanding of film reception. In here you will find essays on the reception of the phenomenon of Hollywood, and sometimes of specific films, in contexts as different as a mining town in Australia in the 1920s (Nancy Huggett and Kate Bowles), in and through an upmarket Japanese cinema in the aftermath of Japan's defeat in 1946 (Hiroshi Kitamura), in colonial Northern Rhodesia in the period leading up to independence (Charles Ambler), and in and around the rising nationalist movements in India in the 1920-30s (Priya Jaikumar). It is important, in understanding this book, that we pay attention to the specificities of these contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Frenchlieutenantswom
    Virtual April 6, 2021 (42:10) Karel Reisz: THE FRENCH LIEUTENANT’S WOMAN (1981, 124 min) Spelling and Style—use of italics, quotation marks or nothing at all for titles, e.g.—follows the form of the sources. Cast and crew name hyperlinks connect to the individuals’ Wikipedia entries Vimeo link for ALL of Bruce Jackson’s and Diane Christian’s film introductions and post-film discussions in the virtual BFS Vimeo link for our introduction to The French Lieutenant’s Woman Zoom link for all Spring 2021 BFS Tuesday 7:00 PM post-screening discussions: Meeting ID: 925 3527 4384 Passcode: 820766 Directed by Karel Reisz Based on the novel by John Fowles Screenplay by Harold Pinter Produced by Leon Clore Original Music by Carl Davis Cinematography by Freddie Francis Liz Smith....Mrs. Fairley The film was nominated for five Oscars, including Patience Collier....Mrs. Poulteney Best Actress in a Leading Role (Meryl Streep) and David Warner....Murphy Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material from Another Medium (Harold Pinter), at the 1982 Karel Reisz (21 July 1926, Ostrava, Academy Awards. Czechoslovakia—25 November 2002, London, England) directed 13 theatrical and tv films: “Act Meryl Streep....Sarah/Anna Without Words I” (2000), The Deep Blue Sea (1994), Jeremy Irons....Charles Henry Smithson/Mike Everybody Wins (1990), Sweet Dreams (1985), The Hilton McRae....Sam French Lieutenant's Woman (1981), Who'll Stop the Emily Morgan....Mary Rain (1978), The Gambler (1974), Isadora (1968), Charlotte Mitchell....Mrs. Tranter Morgan (1966), Night Must Fall (1964), Saturday Lynsey Baxter....Ernestina Night and Sunday Morning (1960), We Are the Jean Faulds....Cook Lambeth Boys (1958) and Momma Don't Allow Peter Vaughan ....Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Lieutenant's Woman
    1993/ /2014 Whose Story?: The Screen Adaptation of John Fowles’s The French Lieutenant’s Woman Sara Martín Alegre Tesina/(MA) Dissertation Programa de Doctorat en Filologia Anglesa Departament de Filologia Anglesa i de Germanística Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction: Establishing the Ownership of Stories ................................................... 1 1.1. Reconsidering the Role of the Screen Playwright ................................................ 4 1.2. Reconsidering Screen Adaptations .................................................................... 13 2.The Novel and the Novelist: Obsessive Authorial Control ......................................... 19 2.1. Vindicating the Victorian Author: The Problem of Controlling the Female Protagonist .............................................................................................................. 19 2.2. The French Lieutenant’s Woman in Conversation with Other Texts: Overcoming the Need for a Husband ........................................................................................... 30 3. The Novel and the Screenwriter: Rewriting from Scratch......................................... 41 3.1. Between Stage and Screen: Harold Pinter ......................................................... 41 3.2. From Project to Film: Selling The French Lieutenant’s Woman to American Audiences ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Working-Class and Post-War Britain in Pete Townshend's
    Class, Youth, and Dirty Jobs: the working-class and post-war Britain in Pete Townshend’s Quadrophenia This chapter examines Pete Townshend’s Quadrophenia (1973) and the way in which it depicts continuity and change in the lives of the British working-class in the period that the album documents (1964/5), the political milieu in which it was written (1972/3), and the legacy of the concept that was depicted in the screen version directed by Franc Roddam (1978/9).1 Quadrophenia was recorded and released in a fraught period of industrial militancy in Britain that had not been witnessed since the general strike of 1926.2 The album can be ‘read’ as both a social history of an element of youth culture in the mid-1960s, but also a reflection on contemporary anxieties relating to youth, class, race, and national identity in the period 1972/3.3 Similarly, the cinematic version of Quadrophenia was conceived and directed in 1978/9 in the months prior to and after Margaret Thatcher was swept to power, ushering in a long period of Conservative politics that economically, socially, and culturally reshaped British society.4 Quadrophenia is a significant historical source for ‘reading’ these pivotal years and providing a sense of how musicians and writers were both reflecting and dramatizing a sense of ‘crisis’, ‘continuity’, and ‘change’ in working-class Britain.5 Along with the novels and films of the English ‘new wave’ and contemporary sociological examinations of working-class communities and youth culture, Quadrophenia represents a classic slice of ‘social realism’, social history, and political commentary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of a Scottish National Cinema Through Short Fiction Films 1930-2016 Zach Finch University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations May 2017 A’ Oor Ain: the Making of a Scottish National Cinema Through Short Fiction Films 1930-2016 Zach Finch University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons Recommended Citation Finch, Zach, "A’ Oor Ain: the Making of a Scottish National Cinema Through Short Fiction Films 1930-2016" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 1469. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1469 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A’ OOR AIN: THE MAKING OF A SCOTTISH NATIONAL CINEMA THROUGH SHORT FICTION FILMS 1930-2016 by Zach Finch A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee May 2017 ABSTRACT A’ OOR AIN: THE MAKING OF A SCOTTISH NATIONAL CINEMA THROUGH SHORT FICTION FILMS 1930-2016 by Zach Finch The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2017 Under the Supervision of Professor Tami Williams This dissertation tells a story of Scottish national cinema through Scotland’s short fiction films from 1930 to 2016. As a small nation within the United Kingdom, Scotland’s film culture has played a subordinate role in relation to England’s, and has struggled for decades to create its own thriving film industry. However, in the mid-1990s, critics and scholars began to talk of a uniquely Scottish national cinema, rather than the traditional and all-encompassing “British cinema,” because of the success of films like Shallow Grave (1994) and Trainspotting (1996).
    [Show full text]
  • English S24. British New Wave Film Steve Dillon Office Hours: Tuesday
    English s24. British New Wave Film Steve Dillon Office hours: Tuesday 9-10 and by appointment Pettigrew 307 Course Description: This course studies significant achievements in British cinema from the late 1950s to the early 1970s. Many national cinemas underwent a liberating change in the 1960s, usually called by the name, “New Wave.” British cinema in the 60s is not as influential as the French New Wave (nouvelle vague) exemplified by Godard, Truffaut, Rivette, Chabrol, and others. Yet there are many important and interesting British films from this period, by directors such as Joseph Losey, Lindsay Anderson, and John Schlesinger. In this course we will look at films by auteurs such as Michael Powell, “kitchen sink” films by Jack Clayton and Karel Reisz, “swinging London” films by Richard Lester and Nicolas Roeg, in addition to masterpieces by foreign artists such as Stanley Kubrick and Michelangelo Antonioni. Schedule M April 26 Robert Hamer, Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949) T 27 Mike Hodges, Get Carter (1971) W 28 Michael Powell, Peeping Tom (1960) Th 29 Joseph Losey, The Servant (1963) M May 3 Richard Lester, A Hard Day’s Night (1964) T 4 Richard Lester, The Knack. And How to Get It (1965) W 5 Nicolas Roeg, Performance (1970) Th 6 Michelangelo Antonioni, Blow-Up (1966) M May 10 Jack Clayton, Room at the Top (1958) T 11 Karel Reisz, Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (1960) W 12 John Schlesinger, Billy Liar (1963) Th 13 Desmond Davis, Girl With Green Eyes (1964) F 14 (Final Project Proposals Due) M May 17 Stanley Kubrick, Dr.
    [Show full text]