DOCSLIB.ORG

Paints for Exterior Masonry Walls

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paints for Exterior Masonry Walls Paints For Exterior Masonry Walls i I BUILDING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES REPORT BMSllO UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS BUILDING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES REPORTS On request, the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing OfiBce, Wash- ington 25, D. C, will place your name on a special mailing list to receive notices of new reports in this series as soon as they are issued. There will be no charge for receiving such notices. An alternative method is to deposit with the Superintendent of Documents the sum of $5, with the request that the reports be sent to you as soon as issued, and that the cost thereof be charged against your deposit. This will provide for the mailing of the pub- lications without delay. You will be notified v/hen the amount of your deposit has be- come exhausted. ' — If 100 copies or more of any report are ordered at one time, a discount of 25 percent is allowed. Send all orders and remittances to the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. The following publications in this series are available by purchase from the Superintendent of Documents at the prices indicated: BMSl Research on Building Materials and Structures for Use in Low-Cost Housing 10^ BMS2 Methods of Determining the Structural Properties of Low-Cost House Construc- tions 10^ BMS3 Suitability of Fiber Insulating Lath as a Plaster Base 16^ BMS4 Accelerated Aging of Fiber Building Boards 10^ BMS5 Structural Properties of Six Masonry Wall Constructions 15^ BMS6 Survey of Roofing Materials in the Southeastern States 15^ BMS7 Water Permeability of Masonry Walls* * BMS8 Methods of Investigation of Surface Treatment for Corrosion Protection of Steel.. 10^ BMS9 Structural Properties of the Insulated Steel Construction Co.'s "Frameless-Steel" Constructions for Walls, Partitions, Floors, and Roofs 10<f BMSIO Structural Properties of One of the "Keystone Beam Steel Floor" Constructions Sponsored by the H. H. Robertson Co 10^ BMSll Structural Properties of the Curren Fabrihome Corporation's "Fabrihome" Con- structions for Walls and Partitions 10^ BMS12 Structural Properties of "Steelox" Constructions for Walls, Partitions, Floors, and Roofs Sponsored by Steel Buildings, Inc - 15c BMS13 Properties of Some Fiber Building Boards of Current Manufacture 10^ BMS14 Indentation and Recovery of Low-Cost Floor Coverings 10^ BMS15 Structural Properties of "Wheeling Long-Span Steel Floor" Construction Spon- sored by the Wheeling Corrugating Co • 10^ BMS16 Structural Properties of a "Tilecrete" Floor Construction Sponsored by Tilecrete Floors, Inc • 10^ BMS17 Sound Insulation of Wall and Floor Constructions 204 Supplement to BMS17, Sound Insulation of Wall and Floor Constructions 5^ BMS18 Structural Properties of "Pre-fab" Constructions for Walls, Partitions, and Floors, Sponsored by the Harnischfeger Corporation 10^ BMS19 Preparation and Revision of Building Codes • • - BMS20 Structural Properties of "Twachtman" Constructions for Walls-and Floors Spon- sored by Connecticut Pre-Cast Buildiners Corporation 10^ BMS21 Structural Properties of a Concrete-Block Cavity-Wall Construction Sponsored by the National Concrete Masonry Association • • 10^ BMS22 Structural Properties of "Dun-Ti-Stone" Wall Construction Sponsored by the W. E. Dunn Manufacturinsr Co 10^ BMS23 Structural Properties of a Brick Cavity-Wall Construction Sponsored by the Brick Manufacturers Association of New York, Inc •4;"V","*m-r' BMS24 Structural Properties of a Reinforced-Brick Wall Construction and a Bnck-Tile Cavity-Wall Construction Sponsored by the Structural Clay Products Institute 15^ BMS25 Structural Properties of Conventional Wood-Frame Constructions for Walls, Par- titions. Floors, and Roofs ^^'^ SMS26 Structural Properties of "Nelson Pre-Cast Concrete Foundation" Wall Construe- tion Sponsored by the Nelson Cement Stone Co., Inc 10^ BMS27 Structural Properties of "Bender Steel Home" Wall Construction Sponsored by the Bender Body Co BMS28 Backflow Prevention in Over-Rim Water Supplies BMS29 Survey of Roofing Materials in the Northwestern States • 15^ BMS30 Structural Properties of a Wood-Frame Wall Construction Sponsored by the ••• '"^ Douglas Fir Plywood Association • BMS31 Structural Properties of "Insulite" Wall and "Insulite" Partition Constructions Sponsored by The Insulite Co • *0trt of print. [List continued on cover page Hi] Paints for Exterior Masonry Walls by * CLARA SENTEL ISSUED NOVEMBER 15, 1947 Building Materials and Structures Report BMSllO UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • W. Averell Harriman, Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS • E. U. Condon, Director I UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1947 FOR SALE BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS. U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 25, D. C. PRICE 15 CENTS Foreword Data on the relative durability and performance of four general classes of masonry paints are given in this report. Out-of-door weathering tests were conducted to determine the serviceability of paints applied to wall specimens constructed of new and used common brick; cast concrete; stone-, cinder-, and lightweight-ag- gregate-concrete block; and wood frame with cement-asbestos shingles. Formulas for the paints and erection of the wall sections are described, as well as methods for applying paint to the specimens. Ratings based on the weathering characteristics and performance of each type of paint and evaluation of painting methods for coat- ing diflferent surfaces are given. Painted specimens which are discussed in detail in the body of this report were exposed to atmospheric conditions in Washington, D. C, for a period of approximately three years. Results of the same tests for a 6-year period are shown graphically in the ap- pendix. Conclusions are for the conditions of test described. E. U. Condon, Director. [ill Paints for Exterior Masonry Walls by Clara Sentel ABSTRACT Four classes of masonry paints, cement-water, resin-emulsion, oil-base, and synthetic- rubber, and one whitewash were applied to test wall specimens of new and used com- mon brick; cast concrete; stone-, cinder, and lightweight-aggregate-concrete block; and wood frame with cement-asbestos shingles to determine the durability of such paints on masonry surfaces. Specimens, exposed to atmospheric conditions for approximately 3 years, were rated on weathering characteristics. Durability of the paints was deter- mined on the bases of type of paint used, type of surface coated, methods of applica- tion and curing, and conditions of casting and painting. Page CONTENTS Lightweight - aggregate - concrete Page (4) block 16 II Foreword (5) Cast concrete 16 (b) I. Introduction 1 Performance of coatings on surfaces not usually painted 16 II. 2 Materials (1) Used common brick wall speci- 1. Paints - 2 mens 16 (a) Cement-water paints 2 (2) New cement - asbestos shingle - (b) Resin-emulsion paints 3 faced wall specimens 17 (c) Oil-base paints 4 VI. Summary and recommendations 17 (d) Synthetic-rubber paints 5 (e) Whitewash 5 VII. Appendix 19 2. Wall specimens 6 (a) General description 6 I. INTRODUCTION (b) New common brick 6 (c) Used common brick 6 Tests to determine the comparative durabil- (d) Cast concrete 6 ity of four general types of paints and one (e) Stone-concrete block 6 (f) Cinder-concrete block 6 whitewash applied under practical painting con- (g) Lightweight-aggregate-concrete block-_ 6 ditions to wall specimens of porous masonry (h) Cement-asbestos shingles 6 were conducted at the National Bureau of III. Painting the wall specimens 6 Standards in an out-of-door test field. The speci- 1. General procedure 6 mens were exposed to weathering conditions for (a) Preparation of the surface 7 (b) Mixing of paints 7 periods of from 24 to 33 months during the (c) Application of paints 7 years from 1940 to 1943. As the use of porous 2. Cemen(>water paints 7 masonry products has increased, so has the 3. Resin-emulsion paints 7 need for 4. Oil-base paints 7 more knowledge of water-repellent and 5. Synthetic-rubber paints 7 decorative finishes for such surfaces.. 6. Whitewash . 7 Permeability of masonry walls to water has IV. Painting the field office 7 been discussed in other reports of the Building V. Test results 9 Materials and Structures series.' This paper 1. Basis of evaluation 9 discusses the condition of specimens of porous (a) Appearance and durability 9 masonry after exposure to the weathering per- (b) General rating 9 (c) Reflectance 9 iod and reports the behavior of coatings of vari- (d) Spreading rate 10 ous types which were applied to these speci- 2. Paints 10 mens. (a) Cement-water paints 11 Masonry specimens, to which the (b) Resin-emulsion paints 11 paints (c) Oil-base paints 11 herein discussed were applied, were constructed (d) Synthetic-rubber paints 14 of new and used common brick; cast concrete; (e) Whitewash 15 3. Wall specimens 15 Building Matei'ials and Structures Reports BMS55, Effects of Wetting and Drying (a) Performance of coatings on commonly on the Permeability of Masonry Walls ; BMS76, Effect of Outdoor Exposure on the Water Permeability of painted surfaces 15 Masonry Walls ; BMS82. Water Permeability of Walls Built of (1) Stone-concrete block 15 Masonry Units; BMS94. Water Permeability and Weathering Re- Cinder-concrete block 15 sistance of Stucco-Faced. Gunite- Faced, and "Knap Concrete-Unit" (2) Walls ; and BMS95, Tests of Cement-Water Paints and Other (3) brick 16 New common Waterproofings for Unit-Masonry Walls. [1] — stone-, cinder-, and lightweight-aggregate-con- II. MATERIALS crete block ; and wood frame with cement-asbes- tos shingle facing. 1. Paints Paints used in the tests were of the types (a) Cement-ivater Paints commonly applied to masonry surfaces. They were white in color and included 20 cement- Cement-water paints are water-dilutable water paints, 4 resin-emulsion paints, 4 oil-base paints in which portland cement is the binder. paints, 5 synthetic-rubber paints, and 1 white- They are especiaUy suitable for use on porous wash. Some were proprietary brands while masonry walls that are damp at the time of others were experimental mixes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PLUMBING DICTIONARY Sixth Edition
    as to produce smooth threads. 2. An oil or oily preparation used as a cutting fluid espe cially a water-soluble oil (such as a mineral oil containing- a fatty oil) Cut Grooving (cut groov-ing) the process of machining away material, providing a groove into a pipe to allow for a mechani cal coupling to be installed.This process was invented by Victau - lic Corp. in 1925. Cut Grooving is designed for stanard weight- ceives or heavier wall thickness pipe. tetrafluoroethylene (tet-ra-- theseveral lower variouslyterminal, whichshaped re or decalescensecryolite (de-ca-les-cen- ming and flood consisting(cry-o-lite) of sodium-alumi earthfluo-ro-eth-yl-ene) by alternately dam a colorless, thegrooved vapors tools. from 4. anonpressure tool used by se) a decrease in temperaturea mineral nonflammable gas used in mak- metalworkers to shape material thatnum occurs fluoride. while Usedheating for soldermet- ing a stream. See STANK. or the pressure sterilizers, and - spannering heat resistantwrench and(span-ner acid re - conductsto a desired the form vapors. 5. a tooldirectly used al ingthrough copper a rangeand inalloys which when a mixed with phosphoric acid.- wrench)sistant plastics 1. one ofsuch various as teflon. tools to setthe theouter teeth air. of Sometimesaatmosphere circular or exhaust vent. See change in a structure occurs. Also used for soldering alumi forAbbr. tightening, T.F.E. or loosening,chiefly Brit.: orcalled band vapor, saw. steam,6. a tool used to degree of hazard (de-gree stench trap (stench trap) num bronze when mixed with nutsthermal and bolts.expansion 2. (water) straightenLOCAL VENT.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitewash for Farms and Homes
    IV"V The Texas A&M University System L-190 Daniel C. Pfannstlel. Texas Director Agricultural College Slalion Extension Service Whitewash for Farms and Homes B. R. Stewart and H. P. O'Neal* Cold water paints such as whitewash, calcimine ing is finished, additional water can be added until the paints and cement washes are used occasionally to im­ whitewash is the proper brushing or spraying consis­ prove the appearance of fences and some farm outbuild­ tency. ings when factory prepared paints are too expensive. Use about 1 gallon of water for each 5 pounds of These cold water paints or washes are not as durable as quicklime. Lumpy slaked lime indicates that not enough oil base or latex base paints, but they protect surfaces for water was added to complete the hydration or slaking up to 2 years if properly prepared and applied. process. Remove any old oil base or latex paint before apply­ Whitewash may be made with commercial hydrated ing whitewashes. Normally, repainting with the same lime, but it will not adhere as well as that made with type of paint will be more economical than removing the quicklime. old paint. The basis of whitewash is lime. Water is a thinner Whitewash Formulas and carrier which evaporates as the wash dries. Unless Factory whitewash for interior use on walls, ceilings and some substance is added which will provide continued posts. adherence, the lime will flake off quickly. Materials used to provide this quality include flour paste, milk, (1) 62 pounds (I bushel) of quicklime; slake with casein, glue, molasses, sodium silicate (water glass) and 12 gallons of hot water.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Repellent Cement Paint
    CSI Div. 07100 WATER REPELLENT COATINGS CEMENT PAINT WATER REPELLENT Unsanded Water Repellent Masonry Coating MANUFACTURER: Empire Blended Products, Inc. 250 Hickory Lane C Bayville, NJ 08721 (732) 269-4949 C Fax (732) 269-0497 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: applying WATER REPELLENT CEMENT PAINT. If WATER REPELLENT CEMENT PAINT is a Portland active water leaks or general seepage exists, repair Cement based paint with added water repellent these areas with EMPIRE BLENDED STOP IT. If agents. It is designed as a brush on coating for active seepage is present, weep holes may be drilled interior or exterior porous cement and masonry in the wall at the floor line. Dampen the wall surfaces to produce both a protective as well as a thoroughly before applying WATER REPELLENT decorative coating. CEMENT PAINT and maintain dampness ahead of application. After WATER REPELLENT CEMENT USES: PAINT has been allowed to cure for 48 hours, patch the weep holes with STOP IT. Paint over the weep < Interior or exterior porous cement and masonry holes with WATER REPELLENT CEMENT PAINT. surfaces < Above or below grade < Basement walls, foundations, garages and curbs Mixing: < Swimming pools, retaining walls, stone and brick In a clean container, add WATER REPELLENT walls CEMENT PAINT to clean water in the ratio of 10 pounds of material for every 2½ quarts of water. Stir ADVANTAGES: until mixture is free from lumps, then thin with 2½ quarts of additional clean water for brush on < Easy to use, just add water application. Allow mix to stand for 15 minutes, remix < Long lasting, will not shrink or peel and apply.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Government Publishing Office Style Manual
    Style Manual An official guide to the form and style of Federal Government publishing | 2016 Keeping America Informed | OFFICIAL | DIGITAL | SECURE [email protected] Production and Distribution Notes This publication was typeset electronically using Helvetica and Minion Pro typefaces. It was printed using vegetable oil-based ink on recycled paper containing 30% post consumer waste. The GPO Style Manual will be distributed to libraries in the Federal Depository Library Program. To find a depository library near you, please go to the Federal depository library directory at http://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/public.jsp. The electronic text of this publication is available for public use free of charge at https://www.govinfo.gov/gpo-style-manual. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: United States. Government Publishing Office, author. Title: Style manual : an official guide to the form and style of federal government publications / U.S. Government Publishing Office. Other titles: Official guide to the form and style of federal government publications | Also known as: GPO style manual Description: 2016; official U.S. Government edition. | Washington, DC : U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2016. | Includes index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016055634| ISBN 9780160936029 (cloth) | ISBN 0160936020 (cloth) | ISBN 9780160936012 (paper) | ISBN 0160936012 (paper) Subjects: LCSH: Printing—United States—Style manuals. | Printing, Public—United States—Handbooks, manuals, etc. | Publishers and publishing—United States—Handbooks, manuals, etc. | Authorship—Style manuals. | Editing—Handbooks, manuals, etc. Classification: LCC Z253 .U58 2016 | DDC 808/.02—dc23 | SUDOC GP 1.23/4:ST 9/2016 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016055634 Use of ISBN Prefix This is the official U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Limewash: Compatible Coverings for ∗ Masonry and Stucco
    International Building Lime Symposium 2005 Orlando, Florida, March 9 -11, 2005 LIMEWASH: COMPATIBLE COVERINGS FOR ∗ MASONRY AND STUCCO Peter Mold1& Richard Godbey2 Abstract Limewash is a versatile, accommodating, and robust surface covering that is compatible with a variety of building surfaces. It is maintainable, beautiful, stable, and long lasting. It is an aesthetic statement to many cultures, from the white houses of Greece, to earth tones of the southwest United States. This paper takes an on-site look at the practical aspects of limewashing on a wide variety of substrates and in a wide range of climates, including: • Types of compatible substrates; • Preparation of the substrate for lime washing; • Use of pigments and additives; • Application techniques on different substrates; • Application techniques in different climates; and • Maintenance. The authors combine their experiences from both the science of lime and the practical application of lime, stone, and earth construction in Europe, America, and Australia--from lime plastering the Globe Theatre in London, England to lime washing modern three-coat stucco in Las Vegas, Nevada. ∗ © Copyright NLA Building Lime Group 2005 The views presented in this paper are solely those of the authors. The National Lime Association (NLA) and the Building Lime Group assume no liability or responsibility for any errors, omissions, or other limitations in this paper or for any products, services, or methods presented. This paper is intended for use by professional personnel competent to evaluate the significance and limitations of the information provided and who will accept full responsibility for the application of this information. NLA and the Building Lime Group do not intend to infringe on any patent or other intellectual property right or induce any other party to do so, and thus users of this document are responsible for determining whether any method, technique, or technology described herein is protected by patent or other legal restriction.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Extension Soovice Washington State University
    ~ COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SOOVICE WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY PULLMAN, WASHINGTON 99163 January, 196 7 E«!M() 2753 lVHITEWASH AND ITS USE There are probably as many methods of making whitewash as there are uses for ito The principal ingredient in whitewash is lime pasteo A satis­ factory paste can be made with hydrated limej but better results are obtained by using quicklime that has been slaked with enough water to make a moderately stiff paste and has been kept in a loosely covered container for several days, or preferably monthso Eight gallons of stiff lime paste are produced by slaking 25 lbso of quicklime in 10 galso of water or by soaking 50 lbso of hydrated lime in 6 galso of watero The paste should then be strained through a fine screen to remove lumps or foreign mattero If casein, t risodium phosphate~ or formaldehyde are not r eadily obtainable, casein glue may be substituted f or these three ingredient s in the propor­ tion of 5 lbso of casein glue to 8 galso of lime pasteo The casein glue should be dissolved in water according to manufacturer 0s directions, diluted to a thin consistency~ and mixed thoroughly with the lime paste just before usingo Do not make more of this mixture than can be used in one day, as it may deteriorateo Casein glue may be obtained in most paint and hardware storeso The inability to obtain casein f or use in any of the formulas where it is recommended also can be compensated for, in part at l east, by substituting skimmed milk f or the water o Skimmed milk contains approximately
    [Show full text]
  • “Whitewash”: USDA Milk Powde Dear Readers: Oversees the Federal Milk Marketing Order Program, Which Prices Milk Values to Nearly 50,000 U.S
    “Whitewash”: USDA Milk Powde Dear readers: oversees the federal milk marketing order program, which prices milk values to nearly 50,000 U.S. dairy farmers. AMS uses NASS dairy commodity weekly price MISSING Let’s be direct. Bad enough that The Milk- data to determine monthly prices paid to dairy farmers. weed had to unveil the “Missing Milk Powder Mil- Bottom line: AMS estimated that revised NASS data for nonfat dry milk sales/volumes caused a loss of only four cents per cwt. on producers’ milk sales, MILK POWDERlions” story in March 2007—long before USDA admitted there was a milk powder-pricing problem. Now we’ve got dating back to April 2006. AMS projected the economic impact of NASS’ milk to go back and break off USDA’s newly-affixed whitewash. powder reporting errors was only about $50 million in lost producer milk revenue. MILLION$ - PART II AMS projected ZERO impact on Class I (fluid) milk prices. For the past two and a half months, USDA personnel have been Hopefully, this pair of USDA whitewashes will not be the final word on the overseeing a year’s worth of back nonfat dry milk powder data, trying “Missing Milk Powder Millions” scandal. The Milkweed has estimated that U.S. to determine the severity and impact of those reporting errors. dairy producers, whose milk is priced by USDA’s federal milk order system, lost close to $1 billion in milk revenue, from August 2006 through April 2007. The two On June 28, USDA issued two reports on the milk powder price report- recent USDA reports do not substantiate this publication’s estimates of “lost” pro- ing problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Paints for Exterior Masonry Walls
    Paints For Exterior Masonry Walls i I BUILDING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES REPORT BMSllO UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS BUILDING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES REPORTS On request, the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing OfiBce, Wash- ington 25, D. C, will place your name on a special mailing list to receive notices of new reports in this series as soon as they are issued. There will be no charge for receiving such notices. An alternative method is to deposit with the Superintendent of Documents the sum of $5, with the request that the reports be sent to you as soon as issued, and that the cost thereof be charged against your deposit. This will provide for the mailing of the pub- lications without delay. You will be notified v/hen the amount of your deposit has be- come exhausted. ' — If 100 copies or more of any report are ordered at one time, a discount of 25 percent is allowed. Send all orders and remittances to the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. The following publications in this series are available by purchase from the Superintendent of Documents at the prices indicated: BMSl Research on Building Materials and Structures for Use in Low-Cost Housing 10^ BMS2 Methods of Determining the Structural Properties of Low-Cost House Construc- tions 10^ BMS3 Suitability of Fiber Insulating Lath as a Plaster Base 16^ BMS4 Accelerated Aging of Fiber Building Boards 10^ BMS5 Structural Properties of Six Masonry Wall Constructions 15^ BMS6 Survey of Roofing Materials in the Southeastern States 15^ BMS7 Water Permeability of Masonry Walls* * BMS8 Methods of Investigation of Surface Treatment for Corrosion Protection of Steel.
    [Show full text]
  • Cedars, Sloops and Slaves: the Development of the Bermuda Shipbuilding Industry, 1680-1750
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1992 Cedars, Sloops and Slaves: The Development of the Bermuda Shipbuilding Industry, 1680-1750 Michael J. Jarvis College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Economic History Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Jarvis, Michael J., "Cedars, Sloops and Slaves: The Development of the Bermuda Shipbuilding Industry, 1680-1750" (1992). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625759. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-j5qa-2a98 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CEDARS, SLOOPS, AND SLAVES: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BERMUDA SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY, 1680 - 1750 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment O f the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Michael J. Jarvis 1992 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Michael^-Jafvis Approved, October 1992 Chandos Brown Marley R. Brown III James Axtell John Sands Table of Contents List of Figures v Acknowledgments vi Abstract vii Introduction 1 Shipbuilding Under The Somers Island Company 5 The Foundations of an Industry 15 The Bermuda Cedar 17 The Bermuda Sloop 22 Bermudian Slavery 39 Sloop Construction 44 Conclusion 54 Appendix 80 Bibliography 82 V ita 88 IV List of Figures Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • By M. Michael Miller
    LIME By M. Michael Miller Domestic survey data and tables were prepared by Lisa D. Miller, statistical assistant, and the world production table was prepared by Glenn J. Wallace, international data coordinator. Lime is an important chemical with numerous chemical, determined by calculating the average value per metric ton of industrial, and environmental uses in the United States. Some quicklime sold or used for each respondent and then multiplying evidence of its use as a lime mortar has been found at a site in it by the quantity of quicklime that the respondent reported sold what is now eastern Turkey that dates from 7,000 to 14,000 or used for each end use. The same calculation is performed for years ago. More definite evidence of its use in mortars in the hydrated lime sold or used. Table 4 displays the total quantity Near East and in the former Yugoslavia dates from 8,000 years sold or used for an end use and the total value of the quicklime ago. In Tibet, it was used to stabilize clays in the construction and hydrate sold or used for that end use calculated as described of the pyramids of Shersi, which were built 5,000 years ago. above. The ancient Egyptians used lime as an ingredient in mortar and The USGS maintains a list of operations classified as plaster. The Chinese, Greek, Roman, and other ancient producing or idle; in 1999, there were 115 operations listed. civilizations used lime for construction, agriculture, bleaching, Two of these operations are not surveyed at the producers’ and tanning (Oates, 1998, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Slavery's Architectural Finishes: the Importance of Interdisciplinary Investigations of Humble Spaces
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2018 Examining Slavery's Architectural Finishes: The Importance of Interdisciplinary Investigations of Humble Spaces Rebekah Zubaida Yousaf University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Yousaf, Rebekah Zubaida, "Examining Slavery's Architectural Finishes: The Importance of Interdisciplinary Investigations of Humble Spaces" (2018). Theses (Historic Preservation). 655. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/655 Suggested Citation: Yousaf, Rebekah Zubaida (2018). Examining Slavery's Architectural Finishes: The Importance of Interdisciplinary Investigations of Humble Spaces (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/655 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Examining Slavery's Architectural Finishes: The Importance of Interdisciplinary Investigations of Humble Spaces Abstract This thesis studies the evidence of architectural finishes in slave dwellings as a vehicle for understanding their lives, experiences and culture. Reviewing the finishes analyses of slave quarters in eight case studies, the author examines evidence of original finishes and observes how they can inform our understanding of slavery, including the possibility of a transfer of color traditions from Africa. The author
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Substances on Concrete and Guide to Protective Treatments
    CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY Effects of Substances on Concrete and Guide to Protective Treatments by Beatrix Kerkhoff Introduction Proper maintenance—including regularly scheduled cleaning or sweeping, and immediate removal of spilled materials—is a simple Portland cement concrete is durable in most natural environments; way to maximize the useful service life of both coated and uncoated however, concrete is sometimes used in areas where it is exposed to concrete surfaces. substances that can attack and deteriorate it. This publication discusses the effects of many substances on concrete and provides guidelines to protective treatments. Improving the Chemical Resistance of Concrete The first line of defense against chemical attack is to use quality concrete with maximum chemical resistance. This is enhanced by the Quality concrete must be assumed in any discussion on how application of protective treatments in severe environments to keep various substances affect concrete. In general, achievement of corrosive substances from contacting the concrete or to improve the adequate strength and sufficiently low permeability to withstand chemical resistance of the concrete surface. Protective surface treat- many exposures requires proper proportioning, placing, and curing. ments are not infallible, as they can deteriorate or be damaged Fundamental principles and special techniques that improve the during or after construction, leaving the durability of the concrete chemical resistance of concrete follow. Refer to Design and element up to the chemical resistance of the concrete itself. Control of Concrete Mixtures (Kosmatka et al. 2002) for further information. Fig. 1. Aggressive substances can compromise the durability of concrete. Shown are concrete beams exposed to high-concentration sulfate soils/solutions.
    [Show full text]