A Case Study of Christian Conservatives and Conflict

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Case Study of Christian Conservatives and Conflict THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DYNAMICS OF GROUP-BASED CONSIDERATIONS ON PARTISANSHIP: A CASE STUDY OF CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVES AND CONFLICT IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Erin Stamatia McAdams, B.A., M.A. **** The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Herbert F. Weisberg, Advisor Professor Paul Allen Beck _____________________________ Professor Kathleen M. McGraw Advisor Graduate Program in Political Science © Copyright by Erin Stamatia McAdams 2009 ABSTRACT Although party identification is generally long-lasting and stable, alterations to partisanship do occur. Because partisanship is a form of social identification, the social groups that comprise political parties serve as meaningful reference points for individuals. This study thus investigates the psychological dynamics underlying the ways in which group-based considerations shape partisanship to better understand the conditions under which individuals become disaffected with their own party – particularly to the extent that they potentially defect. Specifically, the project examines the conditions under which affect toward subgroups translates to affect toward the political party, thus shaping attitudes toward its presidential primary candidates, partisan identity and the strength of partisanship. The primary proposition of this study is that party images – or their perceptions of subgroup influence on the party – condition these effects, particularly for those who are not members of the subgroup in question. In other words, affective and cognitive reactions to these groups interact such that those who perceive that a negatively evaluated group is “taking over” the party should cause some partisans to weaken their attachments. This project utilizes the conflict occurring within the Republican Party‟s coalition as the result of the mobilization of Christian conservatives into its base as a case study. ii Over past 30 years, the core of the Republican Party has altered substantially. Once dominated by economic conservatives, the GOP has experienced considerable growth in its Christian conservative constituency. Although this group‟s financial and electoral support has provided many short-term gains for the party, some have questioned whether the inclusion of this group may have negative, long-term consequences for the party – as the increasing influence of Christian conservatives on the party may alienate the traditional core of the party and cause them to defect. Relying on data obtained from an original mail survey of registered voters in Franklin County, Ohio, during the 2008 presidential campaign, the project finds that the perception that Christian conservatives are too influential on the GOP does condition this relationship for non-evangelical Republicans‟ partisan attitudes and feelings toward its presidential primary candidates. These perceptions of influence also directly shape the strength of their partisan identity and determine whether they weaken their partisanship over the course of the 2008 campaign. iii FOR JUSTIN my monkey, my love and for my parents RONALD AND IRENE McADAMS who encouraged me to reach for “high apple pie, in the sky” hopes iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without a substantial amount of support from a variety of individuals. However, no single person has challenged – and encouraged – me on this project more than my advisor, Herbert Weisberg, who has taught me the true meaning of being a scholar. Since the start of my graduate career, he has offered invaluable intellectual and professional advice – and he still continues to do so. I am indebted to him for regularly meeting with me, which he offered even despite his busy schedule as department chair. On this project especially, he provided excellent guidance on both methodological and substantive issues and yet gave me enough latitude to explore my own ideas. His dedication, patience and professional example have helped me to become a better scholar and person, and I remain deeply fortunate to have encountered such a wonderful teacher, role model and friend. Every student should be so lucky as to have a mentor such as him! And I offer countless and very sincere thanks to him for his enduring support of my research, of my career and of me. I also owe a great deal of gratitude to my committee members Paul Beck and Kathleen McGraw for their guidance on this project. Both challenged me to move beyond my intellectual “comfort zone,” particularly with regard to the foundations of this v research. They helped to shape the initial ideas of this dissertation into fruition and also provided a great deal of thoughtful feedback on this project. Many individuals at Ohio State have also helped to shape my graduate career. I am thankful for the tutelage of Jan Box-Steffensmeier and Alan Wiseman, who helped me to develop critical skills in research and teaching. I also thank Larry Baum and Wayne DeYoung for helping me to understand the pedagogical and practical aspects of teaching political science, Bill Miller and Josh Morris for their generous assistance in printing surveys, and the front office staff for their kind support on administrative matters. I thank the Graduate School at Ohio State for providing partial financial support for my data collection through an Alumni Grant for Graduate Research and Scholarship. Of course, this dissertation would not have been possible if I had not been inspired to become a political scientist in the first place. My undergraduate experiences at Allegheny College made me realize my aspiration to become a scholar and teacher, and I continue to strive to be as intellectually stimulating, challenging and encouraging to my students as these professors were to me: Irwin Gertzog, Michael Maniates and Eric Pallant. I would also like to thank my colleague and friend Anand Sokhey, with whom I collaborated on the research for this project and who generously included my survey questions on the post-convention and election waves of this panel study. Although not our first collaborative research effort – and hopefully, not our last – this was the most fun. I am also grateful to have many friendships that were invaluable to provide the sanity – and often, moments of insanity – needed to complete this project. I offer many vi sincere thanks to Nicoleta Bazgan, Roman and Madeline Ivanchenko, Danielle Langfield, Patricia Mendez, Dag Mossige, Amanda Rosen, Anita Saha, Konstantin Vössing, Srdjan Vucetic, Mark Vuchenich and Lorenzo Zambernardi. Few individuals are as blessed to have family members who support you as unconditionally as I have. In particular, my parents, Ronald and Irene McAdams, have provided both financial and emotional support throughout my career. They instilled in me a love for American politics and history, a respect for the educational experience and the strength to accomplish my many dreams. They – as well as my sister, Stephanie – have encouraged me at each stage throughout graduate school, praising every minor accomplishment and comforting every setback. The constant love and support from them have helped me to move many “rubber tree plants” throughout my life, and this experience has been no different. I am eternally grateful to them for their support. Finally, and most importantly, I am indebted to my husband, Justin Earl Lance, without whom this research project literally would not have been successful. He stapled, folded and helped to stuff more than 10,000 surveys – without pay – over the course of this panel study. He read – and re-read – previous drafts of the project and spent endless hours discussing this research with me. But his support that led to the completion of this dissertation extends far beyond these tedious tasks. His encouragement carried me throughout each stage of this project, and his patience taught me the importance of believing – not just that I would finish this project – but in myself as well. His unwavering love and support render him the best husband, partner, colleague, officemate and friend that I could imagine. And for that, I am truly grateful. vii VITA July 11, 1977……………………………. Born – McKeesport, Pa. 1999……………………………………... B.A., magna cum laude, Political Science, Allegheny College 2004……………………………………... M.A., Political Science, The Ohio State University 2002 to 2009…………………………... Graduate Research and Teaching Associate, The Ohio State University PUBLICATIONS Weisberg, Herbert F., and Erin S. McAdams. “Change in the Components of the Electoral Decision: The Nature of Short-term Forces in Elections. Electoral Studies, forthcoming. FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Political Science viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract…………………………………………………………………………….. ii Dedication………………………………………………………………………….. iv Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………….. v Vita…………………………………………………………………………………. vii List of Tables………………………………………………………………………... x List of Figures………………………………………………………………………. xii CHAPTERS: 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………… 1 2. A Psychological Theory of the Group-based Nature of Partisanship……….. 17 3. The Extent of Conflict within the Republican Party……………………….. 46 4. The Impact of Group-based Considerations on Partisan and Candidate Attitudes……………………………………………………………………. 71 5. The Consequences for Republicans‟ Strength of Partisanship……………... 111 6. Democrats‟ Attitudes toward the Republican Party………………………... 135 7. Conclusion………………………………………………………………….
Recommended publications
  • Multiple Dimensions of the Moral Majority Platform: Shifting Interest Group Coalitions
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 1986 Multiple Dimensions of the Moral Majority Platform: Shifting Interest Group Coalitions Helen A. Moore University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Hugh P. Whitt University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Sociology Commons Moore, Helen A. and Whitt, Hugh P., "Multiple Dimensions of the Moral Majority Platform: Shifting Interest Group Coalitions" (1986). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 105. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/105 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in The Sociological Quarterly 27:3 (1986), pp. 423-439. Copyright 1986 by JAI Press, Inc. Published by Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the Midwest Sociological Society. Used by permission. Multiple Dimensions of the Moral Majority Platform: Shifting Interest Group Coalitions Helen A. Moore Hugh P. Whitt University of Nebraska–Lincoln Corresponding author — Helen A . Moore, Department of Sociology, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln Nebraska 68588-0324 Abstract The issues raised by the New Political Right and the Moral Majority have over- lapped in recent political history. Researchers have assumed that a single additive scale across conservative issues can identify the base of support for the Moral Majority as an organization. We examine general support for the Moral Majority separately from sup- port for six specific issues: teaching creationism, voluntary public school prayer, mil- itary defense spending, gun control, pornography and abortion.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
    The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • The New Right
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 The New Right Elizabeth Julia Reiley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Reiley, Elizabeth Julia, "The New Right" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625286. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-mnnb-at94 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW RIGHT 'f A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Sociology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Elizabeth Reiley 1984 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Elizabeth Approved, May 1984 Edwin H . Rhyn< Satoshi Ito Dedicated to Pat Thanks, brother, for sharing your love, your life, and for making us laugh. We feel you with us still. Presente! iii. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................... v ABSTRACT.................................... vi INTRODUCTION ................................ s 1 CHAPTER I. THE NEW RIGHT . '............ 6 CHAPTER II. THE 1980 ELECTIONS . 52 CHAPTER III. THE PRO-FAMILY COALITION . 69 CHAPTER IV. THE NEW RIGHT: BEYOND 1980 95 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION ............... 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................. 130 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express her appreciation to all the members of her committee for the time they gave to the reading and criticism of the manuscript, especially Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christian Coalition in the Life Cycle of the Religious Right
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1997 Defying the odds: The Christian Coalition in the life cycle of the Religious Right Kathleen S Espin University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Espin, Kathleen S, "Defying the odds: The Christian Coalition in the life cycle of the Religious Right" (1997). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 3321. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/CQHQ-ABU5 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text direct^ from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter fiic^ udnle others may be fix>m any type o f computer printer. The qnalityr of this reproduction is dependent npon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversety afikct reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Rendered Fri Aug 30 11:59:44 EDT 2013
    Paul M. Weyrich Scrapbooks A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2013 Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms013081 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm2010085568 Prepared by Nan Thompson Ernst with the assistance of Rosa Hernandez and Brian McGuire Collection Summary Title: Paul M. Weyrich Scrapbooks Span Dates: 1942-2009 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1960-2008) ID No.: MSS85568 Creator: Paul M. Weyrich Extent: 15,000 items ; 44 containers ; 17.6 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Political activist and commentator. Correspondence, speeches and writings, photographs, press passes, media scripts and programming guides, news clippings, political cartoons, news releases and newsletters, agenda, conference schedules, programs, minutes of meetings, advertisements, posters and flyers, brochures and booklets, as well as rail transit, family, school, and church records. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. People Allott, Gordon, 1907-1989. Curtis, Carl T. (Carl Thomas), 1905-2000. Weyrich family. Weyrich, Paul M. Organizations Amtrak Reform Council (U.S.) Amtrak. Board of Directors. Catholic Church--Byzantine rite, Melchite. Catholic Church. Free Congress Research and Education Foundation. Heritage Foundation (Washington, D.C.) Holy Transfiguration Melkite Greek-Catholic Church. Krieble Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Movement
    Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilizing the Moral Majority
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 225 886 SO 014 441 AUTHOR Liebman, Robert C. TITLE Mobilizing the Moral Majority. PUB DATE Apr 82 NOTE 23p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting ofthe American Sociological Association (San Francisco, CA, September 1982). Financial support providedby the Princeton University, Dept. of Sociology. PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Comparative Analysis; Organizational Effectiveness; Political Influences; *Political Power;*Religious Organizations; Social Networks; *Success IDENTIFIERS Mobilization; *Moral Majority; Social,Movements ABSTRACT The Moral Majority has been more successful in mobilizing conservative Christians than three otherevangelical groups--Third Century Publishers, Christian Voice, and theReligious Roundtable. According to the literature on socialmovements, four Oossible explanations for the success of such groups arethat they have access to financial resources, canmaintain an exfensive network of communications between organizers andconstituents, can draw upon the expertise and skills of social movemententrepreneurs, and can mobilize during a period in time in'which thersis a favorable conjunction of issues. None of these factors proveswholly satisfactory in accounting for differences among thefour organizations in their mobilization of supporters.The Moral Majority was more successfulbecause its leadership provided it with access to pre-existing networks which were unavailable toother Christian groups. For example, JerryFalwell's "Old Time Gospel Hour" provided a communications linkvia television to a large national audience. The Moral Majority's genius lay in linkingwith a national network of nservative clergymen and in championing issues ofmajor concern to this group. While taking advantage of thesepre-existing associations, the Moral Majority did have to accommodatetheir previously organized constituenciesk (RM) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that canbe made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Evangelical Support For, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 9-1-2020 Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election Joseph Thomas Zichterman Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Political Science Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Zichterman, Joseph Thomas, "Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5570. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7444 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election by Joseph Thomas Zichterman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Thesis Committee: Richard Clucas, Chair Jack Miller Kim Williams Portland State University 2020 Abstract This thesis addressed the conundrum that 81 percent of evangelicals supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election, despite the fact that his character and comportment commonly did not exemplify the values and ideals that they professed. This was particularly perplexing to many outside (and within) evangelical circles, because as leaders of America’s “Moral Majority” for almost four decades, prior to Trump’s campaign, evangelicals had insisted that only candidates who set a high standard for personal integrity and civic decency, were qualified to serve as president.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moral Majority: the Fundamental1st-Christian's Fight Against Humanism and Pluralism in American Politics
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1983 The Moral Majority: The Fundamental1st-Christian's Fight Against Humanism and Pluralism in American Politics James A. Kruis Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kruis, James A., "The Moral Majority: The Fundamental1st-Christian's Fight Against Humanism and Pluralism in American Politics" (1983). Master's Theses. 1586. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1586 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MORAL MAJORITY: THE FUNDAMENTAL1ST-CHRISTIAN'S FIGHT AGAINST HUMANISM AND PLURALISM IN AMERICAN POLITICS by James A. Kruis A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of P o litica l Science Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1983 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE MORAL MAJORITY: THE FUNDAMENTALIST-CHRISTIAN’S FIGHT AGAINST HUMANISM AND PLURALISM IN AMERICAN POLITICS James A. Kruis, M.A. Western Michigan University, 1983 The Moral Majority claims to be nonreligious but they are actually a very religious reaction against humanism and pluralism, fighting their battle from behind a facade of legitimate moral issues. Their reaction against humanism is due to their failure to distinguish properly between religion and morality.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. For example: • Manuscript pages may have indistinct print. In such cases, the best available copy has been filmed. • Manuscripts may not always be complete. In such cases, a note will indicate that it is not possible to obtain missing pages. • Copyrighted material may have been removed from the manuscript. In such cases, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or as a 17”x 23” black and white photographic print. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or microfiche but lack the clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, 35mm slides of 6”x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography. Order Number 8726686 Fa 1 we 11 and fantasy: The rhetoric of a religious and political m ovem en t McDonald, Becky Ann, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1987 UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fellowship of the Crooked Cross: Trump's Evangelical Hounds of Hell
    Postdigital Science and Education https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00074-7 ORIGINAL ARTICLES The Fellowship of the Crooked Cross: Trump’s Evangelical Hounds of Hell Peter McLaren1,2 & Petar Jandrić3 # Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Abstract This critical rage pedagogy article explores intersections between Alt-Right movements and Christian fundamentalist prosperity theology. Starting from The Fellowship Foundation founded in the USA in the 1930s and looking at similar and interconnected developments in various countries from South America, Africa, and Europe, the article explores theological foundations of today's world- wide ascend of fascism. Using the example of Anders Behring Breivik’sfamous terrorist attack in Norway, it explores theoretical background for Alt-Right attacks on political correctness and ‘cultural Marxism’. Looking into the 'end of the world' theology and its morality, the article explains deep relationships between Christian fundamentalist prosperity theology and Israel. The article connects Christianity’s forward-looking, linear view of history with ‘end of the world’ theology and capitalism. It explores the postdigital and post-truth nature of evangelical Christians’ public communications and links them to various anti- intellectualist tendencies such as the anti-vaccination movement. Using insights from Marxism, critical pedagogy, and liberation theology, the article demystifies Christian fundamentalist theology and points towards opportunites for resistance. Keywords Criticalpedagogy. Liberation theology. Christian fundamentalism. Prosperity theology. Alt-Right . Linear time . Marxism * Peter McLaren [email protected] Petar Jandrić [email protected] 1 Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA 2 Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China 3 Zagreb University of Applied Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia Postdigital Science and Education Glorious news, everyone! Donald Trump is God! Everything makes sense now, and the final purpose of all things is at last clear.
    [Show full text]