DOCSLIB.ORG

De-Ranged Global Power and Air Mobility for the New Millennium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
De-Ranged Global Power and Air Mobility for the New Millennium De-Ranged Global Power and Air Mobility for the New Millennium ROBERT A. COLELLA, Lt Col, USAF School of Advanced Airpower Studies THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE SCHOOL OF ADVANCED AIRPOWER STUDIES, MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, ALABAMA, FOR COMPLETION OF GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS, ACADEMIC YEAR 2000–2001. Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6615 July 2002 This School of Advanced Airpower Studies thesis is available electronically at the Air University Research Web site http://research. maxwell.af.mil under “Research Papers” then “Special Collections.” Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: dis- tribution unlimited. ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii ABSTRACT . v ABOUT THE AUTHOR . vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . ix 1 GLOBAL POWER FOR AMERICA . 1 2 WORLD WAR II ORIGINS AND COLD WAR MATURITY . 5 3 GLOBAL POWER––POST–COLD WAR: ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE FUTURE . 21 4 CASE STUDIES IN GLOBAL POWER . 45 5 EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . 75 6 CONCLUSIONS . 89 Illustrations Figure 1 Operation Black Buck Refueling Plan . 57 Table 1 Tanker Off-load Capabilities . 81 2 Case Study Tanker Usage . 81 Maps Operation Nickel Grass Routing . 47 Routing through the Mediterranean . 50 Falkland Islands War Global Distances . 54 Operation Eldorado Canyon Overview . 64 iii Abstract This is a story of long-range airpower, from Gen Henry H. “Hap” Arnold’s vi- sion of a global mission to the Global Strike Task Force and expeditionary air forces of the year 2001. It examines global power from its origins as Strategic Air Command built a fleet of bombers and tankers to meet the needs of the global nuclear-deterrent policy of the Cold War. With the end of the Cold War and the changes in force structure that followed, USAF soon lost its historical roots in global power. This evolution is traced through the studies and commissions of the 1990s established to determine the force structure for the twenty-first cen- tury. The assumptions that were made to develop a force focused on expedi- tionary short-range airpower to project global power are established and then examined with four case studies in the application of airpower over long range. Operation Nickel Grass, the US airlift to Israel during the 1973 Yom Kippur War; the British airpower experience in the Falkland Islands War with its Vulcan Black Buck missions; Operation Eldorado Canyon; and Operation Desert Strike are used to provide evidence to support and refute the assumptions made dur- ing the 1990s to structure the USAF force structure around short-range expedi- tionary forces with the intention of forward deploying them in a crisis. These case studies are evaluated and recommendations are offered for the force struc- ture of the twenty-first century to ensure an adequate global power force capa- ble of executing a global power strategy. The conclusions of this study do not make recommendations for long- or short-range airpower but rather offer rec- ommendations for methods to enable those forces in the future with a sturdy in- flight refueling force capable of supporting long-range missions free from the en- tanglements of foreign support and reliance on forward basing. v About the Author Lt Col Robert A. Colella (BS, United States Air Force Academy [USAFA]; MS, Louisiana State University, Shreveport) received a regular commission from USAFA in May 1986. After graduation from undergraduate pilot training at Williams AFB, Arizona, in 1987, he was assigned as a pilot in the B-52G at Wurt- smith AFB, Michigan, from March 1988 to March 1992. During this tour he per- formed nuclear alert duties in the B-52 and upgraded to aircraft commander. He was reassigned to Castle AFB, California, in 1992 to the 34th Bomb Squadron attached to the 366th Composite Wing, Mountain Home AFB, Idaho. During this tour Colonel Colella upgraded to instructor pilot, B-52G, and was selected for the USAF Weapons Instructor Course. After graduation from Weapons School, he was assigned to B-52H Formal Training Unit duty at Barksdale AFB, Louisiana, from July 1994 to July 1996. He was selected for the B-2 program at Whiteman AFB, Missouri, in 1996. From June 1996 to June 1999, Colonel Colella was a B-2 mission commander, instructor pilot, and the wing weapons officer for the 509th Bomb Wing. He was the strike planning chief for all B-2 sor- ties flown in Operation Allied Force and was a member of one of the first crews to fly the B-2 into combat during a 30-hour combat mission. As a senior pilot with more than 3,000 flying hours, he was awarded the Air Force Air Medal for his missions over Kosovo and has also been awarded the Meritorious Service Medal. Colonel Colella is a distinguished graduate of Squadron Officers School and a graduate of Air Command and Staff College and the School of Advanced Airpower Studies. In July 2001, he was reassigned to the Pentagon, AF/XOOC––Checkmate. Colonel Colella is married to the former Katherine Page, and they have two children, Allison and Sam. vii Acknowledgments I thank my research advisor, Maj John Terino, and my reader, Col Stephen Chiabotti, for their inspiration and guidance. In addition, I thank all faculty members of the School for Advanced Airpower Studies (SAAS) for their dedica- tion to the mission of educating tomorrow’s airpower strategists. I am grateful to them for their in-depth knowledge and for their dedication as teachers. Last, but certainly not least, I thank my wife and family for their continued support and prayers throughout this year. Katy not only gave birth to our second child, Sam, but was the glue that held our family together over this past year through the academic rigors of SAAS. ix Chapter 1 Global Power for America Russia . does fear our long-range Strategic Air Force, which she cannot as yet match, or as yet understand. In the Strategic Air Force, coupled with our atomic bomb, at this writing we hold the balance of power in the world. —Gen Henry H. “Hap” Arnold —Global Mission Vision for Global Power Gen Henry H. “Hap” Arnold envisioned a “global mission” for airpower where the force structure would meet the challenges of “range, fire power, [and] bombload” to provide what “we [Arnold and Brig Gen William “Billy” Mitchell] all preached and hoped for . the [strategic] independent func- tion of airpower in which we had so long believed.”1 The force structure born under General Arnold in World War II matured within Strategic Air Command (SAC) to provide the global mission of nuclear deterrence throughout the remainder of the twentieth century. Although SAC dis- solved in June 1992, the Air Force did not lose its vision of a global mis- sion for airpower. Secretary of the Air Force Donald B. Rice’s Global Reach—Global Power white paper in 1990 was the vision for the future without the Soviet Union as a focus for the global mission. With the dis- banding of the Soviet Union, a New World Order emerged where threats, conflicts, and obstacles shared uncertainty as their most common attrib- ute. In the United States, pressure to downsize and the promise of a peace dividend led to smaller military budgets that supported a shrinking force burdened by a mission clouded by uncertainty. Although downsizing meant the withdrawal of forward-deployed units around the world, the strategy outlined in Global Reach—Global Power committed America to both the presence and the ability to influence events militarily across the globe. The end of the Cold War also brought demands for thrift and limits on the research, development, and acquisition of new weapon systems to meet the undefined challenges of the New World Order. It is within this context that the strategy contained in Global Reach—Global Power and the force structure to support it evolved as the United States entered the twenty-first century. Global Reach—Global Power detailed a post–Cold War strategy to rapidly deploy forces and assume a forward presence to assure regional stability and firepower wherever required. Within this strategy, long-range forces were central to satisfying “global responsibilities requir[ing] capabilities independent of the need for mobilization and the political baggage some- times inherent in that process.”2 Strategy, however, as Carl H. Builder 1 points out in his book The Masks of War, “is not the only determinant of the purposes and kinds of military force. Institutional preferences, tech- nological developments, [and] opposing forces [all] influence . the ac- quisition of military capabilities.” Builder also points out that strategy should be an honest broker and work outside of the external influences of its “formulation and application.”3 As Builder explains, “If strategy does not adequately take into account or allow for service predilections or dif- fering interpretations of the threat, the military forces will be driven to some degree by factors omitted from strategy. Strategy should drive the forces; if it does not it may reflect the inadequacies of a particular strat- egy rather than the proper role of strategy.”4 This study asks whether the strategy contained in Global Reach—Global Power has evolved credibly with a force structure to project power globally in the twenty-first century. Do the needs of the global power strategy drive the force structure or, as Builder warned, do the “externalities” of institu- tional preference play too large a role in shaping the force structure? Definition Global power is rooted in the World War II and Cold War images of waves of aircraft conducting the long-range strategic attacks described in Gen- eral Arnold’s Global Mission.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes
    US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes BRAD ELWARD ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD 211 US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes BRAD ELWARD ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 ORIGINS OF THE CARRIER AND THE SUPERCARRIER 5 t World War II Carriers t Post-World War II Carrier Developments t United States (CVA-58) THE FORRESTAL CLASS 11 FORRESTAL AS BUILT 14 t Carrier Structures t The Flight Deck and Hangar Bay t Launch and Recovery Operations t Stores t Defensive Systems t Electronic Systems and Radar t Propulsion THE FORRESTAL CARRIERS 20 t USS Forrestal (CVA-59) t USS Saratoga (CVA-60) t USS Ranger (CVA-61) t USS Independence (CVA-62) THE KITTY HAWK CLASS 26 t Major Differences from the Forrestal Class t Defensive Armament t Dimensions and Displacement t Propulsion t Electronics and Radars t USS America, CVA-66 – Improved Kitty Hawk t USS John F. Kennedy, CVA-67 – A Singular Class THE KITTY HAWK AND JOHN F. KENNEDY CARRIERS 34 t USS Kitty Hawk (CVA-63) t USS Constellation (CVA-64) t USS America (CVA-66) t USS John F. Kennedy (CVA-67) THE ENTERPRISE CLASS 40 t Propulsion t Stores t Flight Deck and Island t Defensive Armament t USS Enterprise (CVAN-65) BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS FORRESTAL, KITTY HAWK AND ENTERPRISE CLASSES INTRODUCTION The Forrestal-class aircraft carriers were the world’s first true supercarriers and served in the United States Navy for the majority of America’s Cold War with the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uss Liberty Story
    THE USS LIBERTY STORY The USS Liberty – the most decorated Navy ship (single action) 1 PURPOSE -- The USS Liberty Veterans Association (LVA) has tried for over 45 years to expose the true story of the deliberate Israeli attack on the US S Liberty to the American people through books, news media, movies, and letters to the President of the United States and congressmen. The mission of the LVA is to pursue the publication of the true story. While we have encountered politicians and news m edia personnel who were willing to help, they have been unable to interest their superiors or others in supporting our cause. Due to political correctness, many people believe it is just too risky to say anything negative about Israel. FYI: The USS Li berty is the most decorated US Navy ship in the history of the Navy for a single action. THE ISSUE -- The Israelis and the US Government do not want the truth to be told. It is obvious that they fear that America may be less of a supportive ally if the t ruth were known. The truth of their deeds and the Johnson Administration require an objective and complete investigation. Congress has never officially investigated the attack and so the attack continues to be a cover - up of the worst magnitude. The Hous e has a constitutional mandate to “define and punish Pirates and Felonies committed on the high seas and offenses against the Law of Nations (Article 1, section 8)”. Regarding the Arab/Israeli ’67 War, we believe the operational plan was Operation Cyanide .
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Air League Newsletter
    The Air League Newsletter Issue 6: November/December 2015 (Photo RAF Crown Copyright 2015) FINAL VULCAN TRIBUTE TO BOMBER COMMAND eteran aircraft of past and present RAF combat missions paid tribute in October to the memory of Bomber Command by performing a spectacular mid-air link-up over Lincolnshire. Tornado GR4 fighter bomber crews, whose colleagues are currently taking part in the campaign against Islamic StateV militants over Iraq, flew in formation with former Cold War V-Bomber, Vulcan XH558, to mark the unveiling of the Bomber Command Memorial spire in Lincoln. A 12 (Bomber) Squadron pilot who flew on the sortie the Falklands in the famous ‘Operation Black Buck’ said: “It was a real privilege to fly one last time with mission to deny the Argentines use of the airfield. such a historic and magnificent aircraft. It was a fitting Vulcan pilot Wing Commander Bill Ramsey (retired), tribute that the RAF’s current bomber, the Tornado who flew the delta-winged icon for nine years, said: “I GR4, escorted the old Vulcan bomber, a once in a am really pleased the RAF and Vulcan To The Sky team lifetime opportunity which we were very proud to be came together to set up a Vulcan and Tornado ‘Past a part of.” and Present’ flight; especially on the occasion of the The RAF Marham-based squadron, which this year dedication of the new Bomber Command Memorial in celebrated its centenary, has a distinguished list of Lincoln that commemorates the service and sacrifice of battle honours including combat operations in Iraq, so many brave people.” being the first GR4 unit to operate in Afghanistan, and In addition to the formation spectacular, October saw a supporting long-range bombing raids against Gaddafi- final farewell tour by XH588 over the weekend of 10th and regime targets in Libya.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons in Undersea and Surface Warfare from the Falkland Islands Conflict
    Beyond the General Belgrano and Sheffield: Lessons in Undersea and Surface Warfare from the Falkland Islands Conflict MIDN 4/C Swartz Naval Science 2—Research Paper Instructor: CDR McComas 8 April 1998 1 Beyond the General Belgrano and Sheffield: Lessons in Undersea and Surface Warfare from the Falkland Islands Conflict 425 miles off the coast of Argentina lie the Falkland Islands, a string of sparsely inhabited shores home to about 1500 people and far more sheep. The Falklands (or the Malvinas, as the Argentineans call them) had been in dispute long before Charles Darwin incubated his theory of evolution while observing its flora and fauna. Spain, France, Britain, and Argentina each laid claim to the islands at some point; ever since 1833, the Falklands have been a British colony, although ever since 1833, the Argentineans have protested the British “occupation.” In April of 1982, an Argentine military dictatorship made these protests substantial with a full-scale invasion of the islands. The British retaliated, eventually winning back the islands by July. Militarily, this entirely unexpected war was heralded as the first “modern” war—a post- World War II clash of forces over a territorial dispute. “Here at last was a kind of war [military planners] recognized”; unlike Vietnam, this was “a clean, traditional war, with a proper battlefield, recognizable opponents in recognizable uniforms and positions, and no messy, scattered civil populations or guerrilla groups to complicate the situation.”1 Here, the “smart” weapons developed over 40 years of Cold War could finally be brought to bear against real targets. Likewise, the conflict provided one of the first opportunities to use nuclear submarines in real combat.
    [Show full text]
  • Hms Sheffield Commission 1975
    'During the night the British destroyers appeared once more, coming in close to deliver their torpedoes again and again, but the Bismarck's gunnery was so effective that none of them was able to deliver a hit. But around 08.45 hours a strongly united attack opened, and the last fight of the Bismarck began. Two minutes later, Bismarck replied, and her third volley straddled the Rodney, but this accuracy could not be maintained because of the continual battle against the sea, and, attacked now from three sides, Bismarck's fire was soon to deteriorate. Shortly after the battle commenced a shell hit the combat mast and the fire control post in the foremast broke Gerhard Junack, Lt Cdr (Eng), away. At 09.02 hours, both forward heavy gun turrets were put out of action. Bismarck, writing in Purnell's ' A further hit wrecked the forward control post: the rear control post was History of the Second World War' wrecked soon afterwards... and that was the end of the fighting instruments. For some time the rear turrets fired singly, but by about 10.00 hours all the guns of the Bismarck were silent' SINK the Bismarck' 1 Desperately fighting the U-boat war and was on fire — but she continued to steam to the picture of the Duchess of Kent in a fearful lest the Scharnhorst and the south west. number of places. That picture was left Gneisenau might attempt to break out in its battered condition for the re- from Brest, the Royal Navy had cause for It was imperative that the BISMARCK be mainder of SHEFFIELD'S war service.
    [Show full text]
  • And Then… (Accounts of Life After Halton 1963-2013)
    And Then… (Accounts of Life after Halton 1963-2013) Compiled & Edited by Gerry (Johnny) Law And Then… CONTENTS Foreword & Dedication 3 Introduction 3 List of aircraft types 6 Whitehall Cenotaph 249 St George’s 50th Anniversary 249 RAF Halton Apprentices Hymn 251 Low Flying 244 Contributions: John Baldwin 7 Tony Benstead 29 Peter Brown 43 Graham Castle 45 John Crawford 50 Jim Duff 55 Roger Garford 56 Dennis Greenwell 62 Daymon Grewcock 66 Chris Harvey 68 Rob Honnor 76 Merv Kelly 89 Glenn Knight 92 Gerry Law 97 Charlie Lee 123 Chris Lee 126 John Longstaff 143 Alistair Mackie 154 Ivor Maggs 157 David Mawdsley 161 Tony Meston 164 Tony Metcalfe 173 Stuart Meyers 175 Ian Nelson 178 Bruce Owens 193 Geoff Rann 195 Tony Robson 197 Bill Sandiford 202 Gordon Sherratt 206 Mike Snuggs 211 Brian Spence 213 Malcolm Swaisland 215 Colin Woodland 236 John Baldwin’s Ode 246 In Memoriam 252 © the Contributors 2 And Then… FOREWORD & DEDICATION This book is produced as part of the 96th Entry’s celebration of 50 years since Graduation Our motto is “Quam Celerrime (With Greatest Speed)” and our logo is that very epitome of speed, the Cheetah, hence the ‘Spotty Moggy’ on the front page. The book is dedicated to all those who joined the 96th Entry in 1960 and who subsequently went on to serve the Country in many different ways. INTRODUCTION On the 31st July 1963 the 96th Entry marched off Henderson Parade Ground marking the conclusion of 3 years hard graft, interspersed with a few laughs. It also marked the start of our Entry into the big, bold world that was the Royal Air Force at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Newport Paper 39
    NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS 39 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE WAR NAVAL Influence without Boots on the Ground Seaborne Crisis Response NEWPORT PAPERS NEWPORT N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O L N L U E E G H E T I VIRIBU OR A S CT MARI VI 39 Larissa Forster U.S. GOV ERN MENT Cover OF FI CIAL EDI TION NO TICE This per spective ae rial view of New port, Rhode Island, drawn and pub lished by Galt & Hoy of New York, circa 1878, is found in the Amer i can Mem ory On line Map Collec tions: 1500–2003, of the Li brary of Con gress Ge og ra phy and Map Di vi sion, Wash ing ton, D.C. The map may be viewed at http://hdl.loc.gov/ loc.gmd/g3774n.pm008790. Use of ISBN Pre fix This is the Offi cial U.S. Govern ment edi tion of this pub li ca tion and is herein iden ti fied to cer tify its au then tic ity. ISBN 978-1-935352-03-7 is for this U.S. Gov ern ment Print ing Of fice Of fi cial Edi tion only. The Su per in ten dent of Doc u ments of the U.S. Gov ern ment Print ing Of fice re quests that any re printed edi tion clearly be la beled as a copy of the authen tic work with a new ISBN. Legal Status and Use of Seals and Logos The logo of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing the Defeat of Argentine Air Power in the Falklands War the Royal Canadian Air Force Journal Vol
    FACTORSTHE ROYAL CANADIAN AIR FOrcE JOURNAL INVOL. 1 | NFO. 4 LUENC FALL 2012 ING THE DEFEAT OF ARGENTINE AiR POWER IN THE FALKLANDS WAR BY OffiCER CADET COLIN CLANSEY, CD A column of No. 45 Royal Marine Commandos march toward Port Stanley. Royal Marine Peter Robinson, carrying the Union Jack flag on his backpack as identification, brings up the rear. © Crown copyright. Imperial War Museum (IWM) www.iwm.org.uk/sites/default/files/ public-document/IWM_NonCommercial_Licence_1.pdf 8 Factors Influencing the Defeat of Argentine Air Power in the Falklands War THE ROYAL CANADIAN AIR FOrcE JOURNAL VOL. 1 | NO. 4 FALL 2012 he Argentine defeat in the Falkland takeover, leave, and negotiate to one of defend Islands War was due in part to the over- the islands at all costs. The invasion precipi- whelming superiority of the Royal Navy tated a furious British response in the form of T (RN).1 Most of the action, however, a large-scale military mobilization to retake involved the air powers of the Royal Air Force the Islands. Forced now to adopt a defensive (RAF), the Fleet Air Arm of the RN, the posture, Galtieri unilaterally ordered the Fuerza Aérea Argentina (FAA) or Argentine airlift of the entire 10th Mechanised Brigade Air Force, and the Commando de Aviación and the 3rd Brigade (a total well over 10,000 Naval Argentina (CANA) or Argentine Naval troops) to the Islands for their defence, a Air Command.2 This paper will analyse the drastic increase from the initial 500 used strategy and tactics of the Argentine air forces for the invasion.8 That he took this decision as the most effective arm of the Argentine without consulting his own senior staff shows military junta.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Safety of Aluminum and Its Alloys
    FIRE SAFETY OF ALUMINUM & ITS ALLOYS Acknowledgement The Aluminum Association gratefully acknowledges the efforts of the task group of the Technical Committee on Product Standards in developing this report: Albert Wills, Hydro Brandon Bodily, Arconic Michael Niedzinski, Constellium Aluminum Association Staff This report was authored by the following Aluminum Association staff: Alex Lemmon, Systems Analyst John Weritz, VP Standards & Technology Use of this Information The use of any information contained herein by any member or non-member of The Aluminum Association is entirely voluntary. The Aluminum Association has used its best efforts in compiling the information contained in this paper. While the Association believes that its compilation procedures are reliable, it does not warrant, either expressly or impliedly, the accuracy or completeness of this information, or that it is fit for any particular purpose. The Aluminum Association assumes no responsibility or liability for the use of the information herein. Introduction As one of the most abundant elements on Earth, aluminum can be found in nearly every industry in our modern world. It is light, inexpensive, and easy to work with, making it ideal for a wide variety of applications ranging from electronics and machinery to aircraft structures and tableware. Aluminum is easily combined with several different elements to produce hundreds of alloys with a dizzying array of properties, making aluminum one of the most versatile materials in industry. Depending on the alloying elements, it can be soft and malleable, or exceedingly strong and rigid. It is also prized for its excellent thermal and electrical properties as well as corrosion resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • SA OP15-18 Björklund Gabriel
    Självständigt arbete (15hp) Författare Program/Kurs Gabriel Björklund OP SA 15-18 Handledare Antal ord: 11 645 Arash Heydarian Pashakhanlou Beteckning Kurskod 1OP415 Robert Pape och Falklandskriget - En teoriprövande enfallsstudie ABSTRACT: Robert A. Pape, an American political scientist, has created a universally known theory about how to successfully conduct military coercion. In his comprehensive quantitative research from multiple cases of coercion Pape’s conclusion is that the denial strategy of air power is what historically have been working. From his cases where he draws his conclusion there is one case missing. Pape has excluded the case of the Falklands war. According to some researchers, the Falklands war which was won by Great Britain, had a successful outcome due to their utility of air power. This essay aims to test if Papes theory of military coercion has the potential to explain the victory of Great Britain in the Falklands War. By conducting a single case study by means of a qualitative text analysis, the answer is to be found. The results shows that Great Britain mainly used a denial strategy with air powers. The Falklands war could have been predicted by this usage. Although it is a conventional conflict, involving both the navy, army and the airforce, it is hard to believe it was only because of the air powers the war was won. The use of a denial strategy can therefore not explain the victory for Great Britain, but it can be a part of the explanation. Nyckelord Robert Pape, Falklandskriget, tvångsmakt, luftmakt, nekande strategi Gabriel Björklund 2017-06-12 223qrzn Innehållsförteckning 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding Thucydides' Trap in the Western Pacific Through the Air Domain
    DIGITAL-ONLY CADET PERSPECTIVE Avoiding Thucydides’ Trap in the Western Pacific through the Air Domain CADET COLONEL GRANT T. WILLIS Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the United States has arguably exercised the most powerful global military imbalance the world has ever seen. This domination; however, is perceived to be fading in the wake of a new possible contender. The tension and likelihood of conflict between the United States and the People’s Re- public of China (PRC) has risen in recent decades. The inevitability of conflict has taken root in many academic and strategic forums such as 92nd Street Y with Graham Allison and Gen David Petraeus (US Army, retired), The Belfer Center, the US Army War College, and many others. The term “Thucydides’ Trap” has echoed in many discussions among leading strategic, military, intelligence, and political science analysts. This is the notion of one rising power seeking to take its place in the sun by replacing the perceived declining power, which has caused many to fear a new kind of war. Dr. Graham Allison identified 16 scenarios over the past 500 years in which two nations competed within the parameters of “Thucydides’ Trap,” and of those scenarios, 12 have resulted in war.1 At a war likeli- hood of 75 percent, the odds do not seem to be in Washington’s or Beijing’s favor. The Pivot Under the Obama administration, the United States formulated the “Pivot” policy, but these strategic redeployments have not fully taken shape. This strategic shift out of Europe and into the Indo- Pacific have shown the strategic danger China has represented, and many would argue resulted in a swift buildup of Chi- nese military capability unlike ever before.
    [Show full text]