The Analysis of the Mcf7 Cancer Model System And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Analysis of the Mcf7 Cancer Model System And THE ANALYSIS OF THE MCF7 CANCER MODEL SYSTEM AND THE EFFECTS OF 5-AZA-2’-DEOXYCYTIDINE TREATMENT ON THE CHROMATIN STATE USING A NOVEL MICROARRAY-BASED TECHNOLOGY FOR HIGH RESOLUTION GLOBAL CHROMATIN STATE MEASUREMENT APPROVED BY SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE Harold Garner, Ph.D. Elliott Ross, Ph.D. Thomas Kodadek, Ph.D. John Minna, M.D. Keith Wharton, M.D., Ph.D. DEDICATION Omnibus qui adiuverunt THE ANALYSIS OF THE MCF7 CANCER MODEL SYSTEM AND THE EFFECTS OF 5-AZA-2’-DEOXYCYTIDINE TREATMENT ON THE CHROMATIN STATE USING A NOVEL MICROARRAY-BASED TECHNOLOGY FOR HIGH RESOLUTION GLOBAL CHROMATIN STATE MEASUREMENT by MICHAEL RYAN WEIL DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas Dallas, Texas March, 2006 Copyright by Michael Ryan Weil All Rights Reserved THE ANALYSIS OF THE MCF7 CANCER MODEL SYSTEM AND THE EFFECTS OF 5-AZA-2’-DEOXYCYTIDINE TREATMENT ON THE CHROMATIN STATE USING A NOVEL MICROARRAY-BASED TECHNOLOGY FOR HIGH RESOLUTION GLOBAL CHROMATIN STATE MEASUREMENT Publication No. MICHAEL RYAN WEIL, B.S. The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 2006 Supervising Professor: Harold Ray (Skip) Garner, Ph.D. A microarray method to measure the global chromatin state of the human genome was developed in order to provide a novel view of gene regulation. The 'chromatin array' employs traditional methods of chromatin isolation, microarray technology, and advanced data analysis, and was applied to a cancer model system. Chromatin is first separated by its condensation state using chromatin fractionation. By probing with a comparative genomic hybridization-style microarray, the chromatin condensation state of thousands of individual loci in an MCF7 tumor model cell line was determined and correlated with transcriptional activity. The chromatin array showed a significant portion (>3,000) of the genes were in a condensation state that was neither condensed or relaxed as a result of heterogeneity in the v condensation states in the population. The utility of the chromatin array in deciphering gene regulation was demonstrated in a MCF7 cell line treated with 5 Aza dC, which disrupts genome methylation, and as a result causes global relaxation of chromatin structure. 5 Aza dC treatment results in strong changes in expression, and a normalized global chromatin relaxation of two-fold. A significant subset of 378 genes was condensed by 5 Aza dC treatment, indicating that a mechanism of chromatin regulation exists that can resist the effects of 5 Aza dC treatment. The genes with the largest changes in response to 5 Aza dC treatment showed a strong correlation with CpG island-based regulation (p < 0.0001), and a restoration of transcription patterns associated with normal mammary tissue. Analysis using splice-form specific microarray probes demonstrated that the chromatin state was not uniform across a gene. These findings indicate that certain gene regions exhibit differential sensitivity to 5 Aza dC treatment, and therefore may be regulated independently. Using functional annotation, expression microarray, and comparative genomic hybridization data, this work should provide a framework through which the biological implications of the relationship between chromatin accessibility and expression may be deciphered. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter One: Background 1-1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 20 1-2 The basics of chromatin............................................................................................ 22 1-2-1 The history of chromatin research: structural versus ...................................... 24 1-2-2 Modern chromatin research: The unification of structure and function.......... 26 1-2-3 Chromatin ImmunoPrecipitation..................................................................... 29 1-3 Microarray technology ............................................................................................. 30 1-3-1 A history of transcriptomics............................................................................ 30 1-3-2 A history of microarray technology ................................................................ 32 1-3-3 Spotted versus light-directed synthesis ............................................................35 1-3-4 Expression microarray methodology ...............................................................38 1-3-5 Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization ..................................42 1-3-6 Chromatin immunoprecipitation on microarrays .............................................44 1-4 Thesis and organization.............................................................................................47 1-5 References ................................................................................................................48 Chapter Two: Development of techniques for robust hybridization of human genomic DNA to cDNA microarrays 2-1 Specificity and sensitivity of cDNA versus BAC microarrays .................................54 2-2 Measurement of human genomic DNA coverage on cDNA microarrays.................56 2-3 Refinements to the high-resolution aCGH method ...................................................61 2-4 Materials and methods...............................................................................................64 vii 2-4-1 Genomic DNA Labeling ..................................................................................64 2-4-2 RNA Labeling ..................................................................................................65 2-4-3 Microarray Production .....................................................................................65 2-4-4 Microarray Clean Up and Hybridization..........................................................66 2-4-5 Washing and Scanning.....................................................................................66 2-4-6 Analysis............................................................................................................67 2-5 References ................................................................................................................68 Chapter Three: Development of a microarray-based assay to measure chromatin condensation state at a subgene resolution 3-1 Development of methods to recover chromatin by its condensation state in preparation for hybridization ...........................................................................................70 3-1-1 Fragment Length Selection .............................................................................71 3-1-2 Chromatin Fractionation .................................................................................74 3-2 Validation of the microarray-based method ..............................................................77 3-2-1 Validation by traditional methods of chromatin state measurement................77 3-2-2 Validation of the chromatin array method .......................................................78 3-2-3 Cross validation of the two chromatin state fractionation techniques .............82 3-3 Insight into transcriptional regulation revealed by global high resolution chromatin studies ..............................................................................................................................83 3-3-1 Combining chromatin array and expression data increases the robustness of the functional classification .............................................................................................84 viii 3-3-2 Novel information provided by high-throughput global chromatin state measurements of synchronized cell culture to resolve heterogeneity issues .............87 3-3-3 Novel information resulting from chromatin state measurements of genes with expression state too low for microarray-based measurement....................................89 3-3-4 The chromatin state data provides significant insight into the relationship between chromosomal alteration and transcription ...................................................91 3-4 Materials and methods...............................................................................................94 3-4-1 Cell culture .......................................................................................................94 3-4-2 Cell cycle synchronization by serum starvation and population analysis........95 3-4-3 DNase I digestion and fragment length selection.............................................95 3-4-4 Micrococcal nuclease digestion and the chromatin fractionation assay ..........96 3-4-5 Microarray characteristics................................................................................96 3-4-6 DNA labeling ...................................................................................................97 3-4-7 Chromatin hybridization ..................................................................................97 3-4-8 RNA extraction and hybridization ...................................................................98 3-4-9 Data extraction, normalization and analysis ....................................................98 3-4-10 Data interpretation..........................................................................................99 3-5 References ...............................................................................................................100
Recommended publications
  • BRCA1-Dependent Transcriptional Regulation: Implication in Tissue-Specific Tumor Suppression
    cancers Review BRCA1-Dependent Transcriptional Regulation: Implication in Tissue-Specific Tumor Suppression Xiaowen Zhang * and Rong Li * Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine & Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (X.Z.); [email protected] (R.L.) Received: 14 October 2018; Accepted: 11 December 2018; Published: 14 December 2018 Abstract: Germ-line mutations in breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) predominantly predispose women to breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1 is best known for its functions in maintenance of genomic integrity including repairing DNA double-strand breaks through homologous recombination and suppressing DNA replication stress. However, whether these universally important BRCA1 functions in maintenance of genomic stability are sufficient to account for its tissue-specific tumor-suppressing function remains unclear. Accumulating evidence indicates that there are previously underappreciated roles of BRCA1 in transcriptional regulation and chromatin remodeling. In this review, we discuss the functional significance of interactions between BRCA1 and various transcription factors, its role in epigenetic regulation and chromatin dynamics, and BRCA1-dependent crosstalk between the machineries of transcription and genome integrity. Furthermore, we propose a model of how transcriptional regulation could contribute to tissue-dependent tumor-suppressing function of BRCA1. Keywords: BRCA1; transcriptional regulation; epigenetic regulation; chromatin organization 1. Introduction Approximately 0.2% to 0.3% of the general population in the United States carries germ-line mutations in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 (BRCA1mut/+)[1,2]. Unlike tumor suppressors such as p53 that are implicated in a broad spectrum of cancers, BRCA1 functions in a gender- and tissue-specific manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Allele-Specific Expression of Ribosomal Protein Genes in Interspecific Hybrid Catfish
    Allele-specific Expression of Ribosomal Protein Genes in Interspecific Hybrid Catfish by Ailu Chen A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama August 1, 2015 Keywords: catfish, interspecific hybrids, allele-specific expression, ribosomal protein Copyright 2015 by Ailu Chen Approved by Zhanjiang Liu, Chair, Professor, School of Fisheries, Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences Nannan Liu, Professor, Entomology and Plant Pathology Eric Peatman, Associate Professor, School of Fisheries, Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences Aaron M. Rashotte, Associate Professor, Biological Sciences Abstract Interspecific hybridization results in a vast reservoir of allelic variations, which may potentially contribute to phenotypical enhancement in the hybrids. Whether the allelic variations are related to the downstream phenotypic differences of interspecific hybrid is still an open question. The recently developed genome-wide allele-specific approaches that harness high- throughput sequencing technology allow direct quantification of allelic variations and gene expression patterns. In this work, I investigated allele-specific expression (ASE) pattern using RNA-Seq datasets generated from interspecific catfish hybrids. The objective of the study is to determine the ASE genes and pathways in which they are involved. Specifically, my study investigated ASE-SNPs, ASE-genes, parent-of-origins of ASE allele and how ASE would possibly contribute to heterosis. My data showed that ASE was operating in the interspecific catfish system. Of the 66,251 and 177,841 SNPs identified from the datasets of the liver and gill, 5,420 (8.2%) and 13,390 (7.5%) SNPs were identified as significant ASE-SNPs, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Molecular Linkers of the Genome: the First Decade of SMC Proteins
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 8, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW Dynamic molecular linkers of the genome: the first decade of SMC proteins Ana Losada1 and Tatsuya Hirano2,3 1Spanish National Cancer Center (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain; 2Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins in eukaryotes. The proposed actions of cohesin and con- are chromosomal ATPases, highly conserved from bac- densins offer a plausible, if not complete, explanation for teria to humans, that play fundamental roles in many the sudden appearance of thread-like “substances” (the aspects of higher-order chromosome organization and chromosomes) and their longitudinal splitting during dynamics. In eukaryotes, SMC1 and SMC3 act as the mitosis, first described by Walther Flemming (1882). core of the cohesin complexes that mediate sister chro- Remarkably, SMC proteins are conserved among the matid cohesion, whereas SMC2 and SMC4 function as three phyla of life, indicating that the basic strategy of the core of the condensin complexes that are essential chromosome organization may be evolutionarily con- for chromosome assembly and segregation. Another served from bacteria to humans. An emerging theme is complex containing SMC5 and SMC6 is implicated in that SMC proteins are dynamic molecular linkers of the DNA repair and checkpoint responses. The SMC com- genome that actively fold, tether, and manipulate DNA plexes form unique ring- or V-shaped structures with strands. Their diverse functions range far beyond chro- long coiled-coil arms, and function as ATP-modulated, mosome segregation, and involve nearly all aspects of dynamic molecular linkers of the genome.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptomic Analysis of the Aquaporin (AQP) Gene Family
    Pancreatology 19 (2019) 436e442 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Pancreatology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pan Transcriptomic analysis of the Aquaporin (AQP) gene family interactome identifies a molecular panel of four prognostic markers in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Dimitrios E. Magouliotis a, b, Vasiliki S. Tasiopoulou c, Konstantinos Dimas d, * Nikos Sakellaridis d, Konstantina A. Svokos e, Alexis A. Svokos f, Dimitris Zacharoulis b, a Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, UCL, London, UK b Department of Surgery, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, Larissa, Greece c Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, Larissa, Greece d Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, Larissa, Greece e The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA f Riverside Regional Medical Center, Newport News, VA, USA article info abstract Article history: Background: This study aimed to assess the differential gene expression of aquaporin (AQP) gene family Received 14 October 2018 interactome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using data mining techniques to identify novel Received in revised form candidate genes intervening in the pathogenicity of PDAC. 29 January 2019 Method: Transcriptome data mining techniques were used in order to construct the interactome of the Accepted 9 February 2019 AQP gene family and to determine which genes members are differentially expressed in PDAC as Available online 11 February 2019 compared to controls. The same techniques were used in order to evaluate the potential prognostic role of the differentially expressed genes. Keywords: PDAC Results: Transcriptome microarray data of four GEO datasets were incorporated, including 142 primary Aquaporin tumor samples and 104 normal pancreatic tissue samples.
    [Show full text]
  • 1073 New Insight in Cdk9 Function: from Tat to Myod
    [Frontiers in Bioscience 6, d1073-1082, September 1, 2001] NEW INSIGHT IN CDK9 FUNCTION: FROM TAT TO MYOD Cristiano Simone, 1,2 and Antonio Giordano1 1Dept. of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA, 2Dept. of Internal Medicine and Public Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Bari, Bari 70124 Italy TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract 2. Introduction 3. Cdk9-interacting proteins 4. Cdk9 and transcription 5. Cdk9 and HIV infection 6. Cdk9 and cellular differentiation 7. Conclusion 8. Acknowledgment 9. References 1. ABSTRACT Cdk9 is a serine-threonine cdc2-related kinase are the catalytic subunits of complexes whose regulatory and its activity is not cell cycle-regulated. Cdk9 function subunits are the cyclins. They are a family of proteins depends on its kinase activity and also on its regulatory named for their cyclic expression and degradation and they units: the T-family cyclins and cyclin K. Recently, several play an important role in regulating cell division. Cyclins studies confirmed the role of cdk9 in different cellular are synthesized immediately before they are used and their processes such as signal transduction, basal transcription, HIV- levels fall abruptly after their action because of degradation Tat- and MyoD-mediated transcription and differentiation. through ubiquitination (4). Interaction between the cyclins and the cdks occurs at specific stages of the cell cycle, and All the referred data strongly support the concept their activities are required for progression through the cell of a multifunctional protein kinase with specific cytoplasmic cycle. Unlike the cyclins, the protein levels of the cdks do and nuclear functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Steroid-Dependent Regulation of the Oviduct: a Cross-Species Transcriptomal Analysis
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Animal and Food Sciences Animal and Food Sciences 2015 Steroid-dependent regulation of the oviduct: A cross-species transcriptomal analysis Katheryn L. Cerny University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Cerny, Katheryn L., "Steroid-dependent regulation of the oviduct: A cross-species transcriptomal analysis" (2015). Theses and Dissertations--Animal and Food Sciences. 49. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/animalsci_etds/49 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Animal and Food Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Animal and Food Sciences by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytotoxic Effects and Changes in Gene Expression Profile
    Toxicology in Vitro 34 (2016) 309–320 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Toxicology in Vitro journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxinvit Fusarium mycotoxin enniatin B: Cytotoxic effects and changes in gene expression profile Martina Jonsson a,⁎,MarikaJestoib, Minna Anthoni a, Annikki Welling a, Iida Loivamaa a, Ville Hallikainen c, Matti Kankainen d, Erik Lysøe e, Pertti Koivisto a, Kimmo Peltonen a,f a Chemistry and Toxicology Research Unit, Finnish Food Safety Authority (Evira), Mustialankatu 3, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland b Product Safety Unit, Finnish Food Safety Authority (Evira), Mustialankatu 3, FI-00790 Helsinki, c The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Rovaniemi Unit, P.O. Box 16, FI-96301 Rovaniemi, Finland d Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 20, FI-00014, Finland e Plant Health and Biotechnology, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy, Høyskoleveien 7, NO -1430 Ås, Norway f Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency (Tukes), Opastinsilta 12 B, FI-00521 Helsinki, Finland article info abstract Article history: The mycotoxin enniatin B, a cyclic hexadepsipeptide produced by the plant pathogen Fusarium,isprevalentin Received 3 December 2015 grains and grain-based products in different geographical areas. Although enniatins have not been associated Received in revised form 5 April 2016 with toxic outbreaks, they have caused toxicity in vitro in several cell lines. In this study, the cytotoxic effects Accepted 28 April 2016 of enniatin B were assessed in relation to cellular energy metabolism, cell proliferation, and the induction of ap- Available online 6 May 2016 optosis in Balb 3T3 and HepG2 cells. The mechanism of toxicity was examined by means of whole genome ex- fi Keywords: pression pro ling of exposed rat primary hepatocytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Glypican-6 and Ng2 As Metastasis Promoting Factors
    UNIVERSITA’ DEGLI STUDI DI PARMA Dottorato di ricerca in Fisiopatologia Sistemica Ciclo XX ROLE OF GLYPICAN-6 AND NG2 AS METASTASIS PROMOTING FACTORS Coordinatore: Chiar.mo Prof. Ezio Musso Tutor: Chiar.mo Prof.Roberto Perris Dottoranda: Katia Lacrima Anni Accademici 2005-2008 To Indy L'anima libera e' rara, ma quando la vedi la riconosci: soprattutto perché provi un senso di benessere, quando gli sei vicino. (Charles Bukowski ) Index Summary ……………………………………………………..................................................... 3 1. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………… 5 1.1. Proteoglycans (PGs)………………………………………………………………......... 6 1.2. Membrane associated proteoglycans……………………………………………..…... 8 1.3. Syndecans……………………………………………………………………………..…. 9 1.4. Glypicans……………………………………………………………………………...….. 11 1.5. GPC6……………………………………………………………………………….…….. 13 1.6. NG2/CSPG4……………………………………………………………………….…….. 14 1.7. Metastasis………………………………………………………………………….….…. 16 1.8. Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS)…………………………………………………………….. 17 1.9. Membrane PGs and tumour……………………………………………………………. 18 1.10. Membrane PGs in sarcoma…………………………………………………………….. 24 2. Material and Methods ……………………………………………………………………… 26 2.1. Cell Culture……………………………………………………………………….………. 27 2.2. RNA extraction……………………………………………………………………….…. 28 2.3. Real Time quantitative PCR……………………………………………….………….. 28 2.4. DNA extraction…………………………………………….……………………………. 30 2.5. Plasmids and Transfection………………………………………….………………… 30 2.6. Western Blotting………………………………………………………………………... 31 2.7. Preparation of ECM substrates………………………………………….……………
    [Show full text]
  • Patient-Based Cross-Platform Comparison of Oligonucleotide Microarray Expression Profiles
    Laboratory Investigation (2005) 85, 1024–1039 & 2005 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0023-6837/05 $30.00 www.laboratoryinvestigation.org Patient-based cross-platform comparison of oligonucleotide microarray expression profiles Joerg Schlingemann1,*, Negusse Habtemichael2,*, Carina Ittrich3, Grischa Toedt1, Heidi Kramer1, Markus Hambek4, Rainald Knecht4, Peter Lichter1, Roland Stauber2 and Meinhard Hahn1 1Division of Molecular Genetics, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany; 2Chemotherapeutisches Forschungsinstitut Georg-Speyer-Haus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; 3Central Unit Biostatistics, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany and 4Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Universita¨tsklinik, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universita¨t Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany The comparison of gene expression measurements obtained with different technical approaches is of substantial interest in order to clarify whether interplatform differences may conceal biologically significant information. To address this concern, we analyzed gene expression in a set of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients, using both spotted oligonucleotide microarrays made from a large collection of 70-mer probes and commercial arrays produced by in situ synthesis of sets of multiple 25-mer oligonucleotides per gene. Expression measurements were compared for 4425 genes represented on both platforms, which revealed strong correlations between the corresponding data sets. Of note, a global tendency towards smaller absolute ratios was observed when
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion Genes Data Set
    Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion genes data set PROBE Entrez Gene ID Celera Gene ID Gene_Symbol Gene_Name 160832 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 223658 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 212988 102 hCG40040.3 ADAM10 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 133411 4185 hCG28232.2 ADAM11 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 11 110695 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 195222 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 165344 8751 hCG20021.3 ADAM15 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 (metargidin) 189065 6868 null ADAM17 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (tumor necrosis factor, alpha, converting enzyme) 108119 8728 hCG15398.4 ADAM19 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19 (meltrin beta) 117763 8748 hCG20675.3 ADAM20 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 20 126448 8747 hCG1785634.2 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 208981 8747 hCG1785634.2|hCG2042897 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 180903 53616 hCG17212.4 ADAM22 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 22 177272 8745 hCG1811623.1 ADAM23 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 23 102384 10863 hCG1818505.1 ADAM28 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 28 119968 11086 hCG1786734.2 ADAM29 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 29 205542 11085 hCG1997196.1 ADAM30 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 30 148417 80332 hCG39255.4 ADAM33 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 33 140492 8756 hCG1789002.2 ADAM7 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 7 122603 101 hCG1816947.1 ADAM8 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 8 183965 8754 hCG1996391 ADAM9 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9 (meltrin gamma) 129974 27299 hCG15447.3 ADAMDEC1 ADAM-like,
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 NOTE TO USERS Page(s) missing in number only; text follows. Microfilmed as received. 222-229 This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI MOLECULAR GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF THE HUMAN AND MOUSE MHC COMPLEMENT GENE CLUSTERS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Zhenyu Yang, M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Program Book
    PROGRAM BOOK Note that TAGC was cancelled and held online with a different schedule and program. This document serves as a record of the original program designed for the in-person meeting. April 22–26, 2020 Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center Metro Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS About the GSA ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Conference Organizers ...........................................................................................................................................4 General Information ...............................................................................................................................................7 Mobile App ....................................................................................................................................................7 Registration, Badges, and Pre-ordered T-shirts .............................................................................................7 Oral Presenters: Speaker Ready Room - Camellia 4.......................................................................................7 Poster Sessions and Exhibits - Prince George’s Exhibition Hall ......................................................................7 GSA Central - Booth 520 ................................................................................................................................8 Internet Access ..............................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]