Thinking the Problematic

Oliver Leistert, Isabell Schrickel (eds.) Thinking the Problematic Philosophy Dedicated to all problems Oliver Leistert is a media and technologies researcher at Leuphana University Lü- neburg, Germany. He did his doctorate in media studies at University Paderborn and was a research fellow at Central European University in Budapest. Isabell Schrickel is a doctoral researcher at Leuphana University. Her main areas of research are the history of science, environmental humanities and media studies. Oliver Leistert, Isabell Schrickel (eds.) Thinking the Problematic Genealogies and Explorations between Philosophy and the Sciences Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche National- bibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http:// dnb.d-nb.de This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeri- vatives 4.0 (BY-NC-ND) which means that the text may be used for non-commercial pur- poses, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ To create an adaptation, translation, or derivative of the original work and for commercial use, further permission is required and can be obtained by contacting rights@transcript- publishing.com Creative Commons license terms for re-use do not apply to any content (such as graphs, figures, photos, excerpts, etc.) not original to the Open Access publication and further permission may be required from the rights holder. The obligation to research and clear permission lies solely with the party re-using the material. © 2020 transcript Verlag, Bielefeld Cover layout: Kordula Röckenhaus, Bielefeld Proofread by Selena Class Typeset by Justine Buri, Bielefeld Printed by Majuskel Medienproduktion GmbH, Wetzlar Print-ISBN 978-3-8376-4640-5 PDF-ISBN 978-3-8394-4640-9 https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839446409 Printed on permanent acid-free text paper. Contents Acknowledgements................................................................................................ 7 Introduction to Thinking the Problematic: Decentring as Method and Ethos Oliver Leistert & Isabell Schrickel .................................................................................9 The Problems of Modern Societies — Epistemic Design around 1970 Isabell Schrickel ..........................................................................................................35 The Problematic of Transdisciplinary Sustainability Sciences Esther Meyer................................................................................................................69 A Genealogical Perspective on the Problematic: From Jacques Martin to Louis Althusser Jean-Baptiste Vuillerod ...............................................................................................93 ‘The problem itself persists’: Problems as Missing Links between Concepts and Theories in Canguilhem’s Historical Epistemology Thomas Ebke ..............................................................................................................109 Compositional Methodology: On the Individuation of a Problematic of the Contemporary Celia Lury ...................................................................................................................127 From Critique to Problems and the Politics of the In-act with Bergson, Deleuze and James Christoph Brunner ......................................................................................................153 Pragmatics of a World To-Be-Made Martin Savransky ........................................................................................................179 About the Authors ...............................................................................................195 Acknowledgements This book emerged from a workshop initiated by Erich Hörl, Oliver Leistert and Martin Savransky called Thinking the Problematic, held at Leuphana Uni- versity Lüneburg in June 2017.1 The workshop was as part of a research theme of the research project CCP | Complexity or Control. Paradigms for Sustainable Development, funded by the Volkswagen Foundation from 2015 to 2019. Most of the contributions to this book had been presented initially at the workshop. The editors thank all participants for shaping an exciting discussion: Didier Debaise, Thomas Ebke, Craig Lundy, Celia Lury, Patrice Maniglier, Esther Meyer, Dimitris Papadopoulos – and in particular Erich Hörl for sparking the discussion and Martin Savransky, who we also had the pleasure to host as a visiting fellow at our project. We also thank Jeremias Herberg, Gregor Schmieg and the whole CCP team for their curiosity, openness and patience for the topic, Ina Dubberke for the smooth institutional support, and Selena Class for rapid, but nonetheless thorough, proofreadings. 1 For a full line-up and the programme see https://www.leuphana.de/zentren/cgsc/aktuell/ termine/ansicht/datum/2017/06/22/workshop-thinking-the-problematic.html. Introduction to Thinking the Problematic: Decentring as Method and Ethos Oliver Leistert & Isabell Schrickel Our occupation with problems (and of problems with us), the entanglement of problems and ideas, and their relations with thought, concepts and solutions, the universality, generosity and violence of problems, and the con- tinued problems we cultivate in order not to develop a sense of problems, a sense that would affirm their transformative offerings and expose us to a risk – these are the topics that the contributions to this volume revolve around in rather different spins. The book is a contribution to the problem of how, when, where and why problems matter, and for whom, and therefore to the inescapable and unmistakable catastrophic resonances that are occuring when modern societies continue to cultivate their amor fati with false problems, ‘that are only possible through various confusions between terms that had been previously separated and constructed, but whose modes of construction are no longer put into question’, as Didier Debaise recalls (2018: 20). Thinking the problematic might therefore as well mean an endeavour for decentring our thinking in order to think again, and to put the modes of construction of problems into question. This sounds quaint, as common sense has it that thinking is obviously part of everyday life. But when we look beyond the cognitive activity as such and understand thinking as a process in and after which a difference has been made – and this difference does not entail, for the moment, any limitations – it turns out that neither common sense nor everyday life help us to engage in the process of thinking. Quite to the contrary: their role is to stabilise, to make certain and to establish conti- nuity – a sound milieu for false problems to flourish in. The force of thinking to transform what it has captured is thus the topic here, and as such it is one way to explore what a problematic might turn out to be – a positive conception of a problem. Most of us know this force from 10 Oliver Leistert & Isabell Schrickel events that shook us and had an impact on how we situate ourselves in the world. In retrospect, however, the actual problematic tends to hide within historical narratives of progress that value the solutions of problems, but not their original stating. Many branches of science and discourses of science and technology, especially in their instrumental, solutionist and result-ori- ented reasonings, are still subject to this constraint. The term problematic is not fixed, and has never been.1 There are, in fact, significant variations in its use and description that prove the vitality of the term or, bluntly stated, its existence as a force on the plane of immanence, as Gilles Deleuze might have it. Whereas some philosophers, scientists, activ- ists and thinkers refer to problems, and tend to address a problematic, oth- ers refer to a problematisation and focus on an activity – the construction of a problem. In addition, an important strand of problematisation refers to ontology and ethos, to the living and how to live. Indeed, turning to the problematic implicates us in the problematisation of ontologies of thought/ thinking,2 a paradoxical phrase at first glance, as Western cultures tend to separate thinking and being, leading to a dramatic devaluation of ontology as a field of thought in general. The division of the two has enshrined ontology as being primarily studied in academic ivory towers by experts, without further consequences than a thesis without a readership. In light of this domestication of problems we attempt to contribute to a more recent intellectual engagement with several original and critical contributions to a positive understanding of problems and the problematic, cultivated primarily in the 20th century French philosophical and epistemo- logical traditions. In contrast to the various negative concepts of problems that are prevalent in particular disciplines or other philosophical traditions – problems as cognitive obstacles, as a relation between the known and the 1 For an etymological definition of the word problem, see Schrickel, this volume, p.50. 2 The historicisation of ontology gained profound traction in a truly pluralistic perspective not long ago when anthropologists started to study ontologies in comparative ways without recasting alien concepts onto abstract modern terms. Although the beginning of these efforts can be dated back to the

Load more