Lack of Citation Capabilities in Mobile Word Processing Apps Highlights Dichotomy Between Ease of Use and Security in Android

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lack of Citation Capabilities in Mobile Word Processing Apps Highlights Dichotomy Between Ease of Use and Security in Android Lack of citation capabilities in mobile word processing apps highlights dichotomy between ease of use and security in Android Wenfa Ng Novena, Singapore, Email: [email protected] Abstract Cite while you write is an essential tool for scientists to cite the literature they referred to in their manuscript and is present in all desktop reference management software such as Endnote, Zotero, and Reference Manager. Incorporated as a plugin in major word processing software such as Microsoft Word and LibreOffice, the feature is also present in some web-based citation management tools such as Endnote Basic and WizFolio. However, the ability to cite an article is missing in almost all Android word processing apps such as Microsoft Word, WPS Office, Google Docs, Polaris Office etc. Not available as a plugin or as an interface between the word processing app and the many reference management apps available on Google Play store, the ability to seamlessly (i.e., with a few clicks) bring a reference item in a reference management app to a citation in a word processing app is not present in Android. From another perspective, can one build a citation using a reference management app and cut and paste it into a word document in, for example, Word app, through the Android clipboard? The answer is very difficult to impossible depending on the modifications made to Android by specific manufacturers. But the more fundamental problem with the lack of citation capabilities on mobile devices is in the need to partition (or sandbox) interface or communication between apps and the need to restrict the types of information shared between apps. Take for example the “Share” button on many news app, the button opens a communication link between the news app and one of the cloud-based file sharing service apps such as Dropbox. Such a feature requires the communication link to be highly protected through encryption. In the case of cite while you write, my personal guess is that a plugin from a reference management app would require significant number of high level app permissions requiring a large communication link between the word processing and reference management apps; a feature hard to achieve within the bounds of the Android kernel architecture, which place security at a premium. Due to the need to restrict app level communications, opening a data channel between the reference management and word processing app for citation information to flow is also difficult from the security point of view, which partly explains why almost all reference management apps are built to collect reference information from a variety of sources such as SSBN, barcodes, URL etc from direct text input, pulling in of information from a database (colwiz), and optical image recognition of a camera photo of barcodes. Collectively, a cite while you write feature is a very useful tool for mobile word processing apps and is a significant addition to a busy scientist’s writing tools given the ease and versatility of referencing something important while reading a news app on mobile devices, especially tablets. However, possible limitations on app communications in the Android operating system likely hinders the development of a plugin for citation in word processing apps, an area that requires the collective imagination and consensus on how to think about security in mobile apps in the next iteration of the open source operating 1 system. Specifically, there will always be conflicting demands on security and ease of use; how to be secure and yet provide seamless functionality? But, can we also rethink how we allow apps to have an open architecture for importing new sub-functions from other apps or open a data channel to them? What is the impact of such an open architecture on app function, and more importantly, app level and operating system security? Keywords: citation, reference management, cite while you write, Android, iOS, Windows Phone, word processing, plugin, security, app permissions, Subject area: science communication, Conflicts of interest The author declares no conflicts of interest. Author’s contribution The author encountered difficulties in using mobile versions of Microsoft Word, Kingsoft Office Writer and Google Docs (all from Google Play store) to cite scientific articles in the word processing documents, and did a small study of the problem by investigating if citation apps available on the Android platform are capable of serving as citation plugins in any of the above mentioned apps. The result is no citation app has the “cite while you write” function and none of the word processing app has facility to include a citation plugin in the way the desktop versions of the app is able to. In fact, none of the citation app can include a citation in the word processing app, and these apps mostly serve the function of pulling in references from the Web or a database search into a library available to be sync across multiple desktop and mobile devices. Funding No funding was used in this work. 2 .
Recommended publications
  • Free Download Jabref Software
    Free download jabref software Download JabRef for free. Download via . Te best BibTex manager and Bibliography software for all platforms! The native file format used by JabRef is BibTeX, the standard LaTeX JabRef can be instructed to search for the full text of a reference, download it, and directly ​JabRef · ​JabRef | Blog · ​JabRef Help · ​Master. Fast downloads of the latest free software!*** JabRef is an open source graphical bibliography reference manager. The application can. Download JabRef - open source bibliography reference manager. This software has many other features and is probably the best free bibliography reference. JabRef is an open source bibliography reference manager The native file format All informations about programs or games on this website have been found in. Free Download. ( MB) Safe & Secure. Share with Friends?Share. Browse Software JabRef bit is an open source bibliography reference manager. The native file format Download JabRef (bit) Latest Version. JabRef free download. Get the Download Now! Downloads Total: | Last week: 5 Ranking #20 in Java Software Publisher Morten Alver. Download JabRef for free. JabRef is Total downloads:1, (2 last week) The most popular versions of the software are , and Software Informer. Log in / Sign up JabRef is an open-source bibliography reference manager. JabRef is DOWNLOAD Free MB. JabRef is a graphical application for managing bibliographical databases. JabRef is designed specifically for BibTeX bases, but can import and. The Software can be downloaded for free on the Internet, in particular at other programs such as, for instance, Freeplane (GPL 2 or later), JabRef (GPL 2) and. Download the latest version of JabRef free.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Management Software Comparison - 6Th Update (June 2016)
    Universitätsbibliothek Technische Universität München Reference Management Software Comparison - 6th Update (June 2016) This document and its content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 1 / 19 Universitätsbibliothek Technische Universität München Reference Management Software Comparison Compiled by: Dörte Böhner (FIZBw Bonn), Thomas Stöber (LMU München) and Astrid Teichert (LMU München) July 2009. Updated by Dorothea Lemke (TUB München; Citavi & EndNote), Katja Tietze (TUB München; JabRef), Michael Helfer (UB Bern; Mendeley, Colwiz & Paperpile), Patrick Frauenrath (UB Augsburg; RefWorks) and Sebastian Podschull (UB der TU Berlin; Zotero) June 2016. Version: July 2016 (6., updated corrected version) Content: > Key questions > General: Provider / URL, current version, licence model, cost, language > Technical Specifications: Installation, platform / operating system, mobile app, character coding, max. number of records, max. online storage space for web-based applications > Import I: Database search, import of references > Import II: Export from databases, capturing metadata from websites, other import options > Data Format: Document types, fields > Editing I: Indices, completion of metadata, interconnections > Editing II: Linking / connecting references, duplicate checking, global changes, folders / groups > View, Search: View, sort, search > Collaboration: Sharing, jointly editing, social networking > Citing: Citation styles, generating bibliographies (static), word processor integration (dynamic) > Miscellaneous: Export, other features, remarks > Ease of Use: Performance, ease of use, help / guides > Overview > Final evaluation > Imprint "Reference Management for LaTeX Newbies" http://mediatum.ub.tum.de/node?id=1315979 All information for this software comparison is compiled after comprehesive software testing. However, due to the complexity and continuing development of applications we can not assume any guarantee for the accuracy of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Management TOOLS: a Special Reference to Endnote in R & D Libraries
    International Journal of Research in Library Science ISSN: 2455-104X Volume 3,Issue 2 (July-December) 2017,89-96 Received: 21 Nov. 2017 ; Accepted: 1 Dec. 2017 ; Published: 10 Dec.. 2017 ; Paper ID: IJRLS-1263 Reference Management TOOLS: A special reference to Endnote in R & D Libraries Kalikadevi G Badiger1; Mallikarjuna Badiger2; Raghavendra R3 Library Assistant, University Library,University of Agricultural sciences, Dharwad- 580 0051; Executive IKC, Jubilant Biosys Limited, Yashwnthpur, Bangalore- 5600222; Assistant Manager, IKC, Jubilant Biosys Limited, Yashwnthpur, Bangalore- 5600223 [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] DOI : https://doi.org/10.26761/ijrls.3.2.2017.1263 ABSTRACT Reference management tools can be used not only for students and academics or teachers, but start-ups, SMEs, marketers, writers, bid-writers, publishers and research agencies. Basically, anyone who is doing research by reading a lot of content on a particular project or has to keep track of a number of citations and sources and needs to keep all the information and sources in one place. The study discusses about the basics of Reference Management Tools followed by definitions, core functions of RMT’s, comparison with other reference management tools like Endnote, Mendeley and Zotero, and finally we discussed about the use of Endnote in the R & D libraries. Keywords: Reference Management Tools, Functions, Popular Tools, Comparison, Mendeley, Zotero, R & D Libraries. 1. Background In today’s scientific research and production managing references has always been a difficult task in reporting research results and producing academic writings. Various software programs have been adopted by, and specifically developed for, authors of systematic reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Softwarevergleich Literaturverwaltung - 7
    Regelmäßige Aktualisierung unter https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/node?id=1316333 Softwarevergleich Literaturverwaltung - 7. Aktualisierung (Juni 2018) Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International Lizenz. Graphik: https://wordart.com/create Softwarevergleich Literaturverwaltung Erstellt von: Dörte Böhner (ThULB Uni Jena), Thomas Stöber (UB der LMU München) und Astrid Teichert (UB der LMU München) im Juli 2009. Aktualisiert von Dorothea Lemke (UB der TU München; EndNote), Katja Tietze (UB der TU München; JabRef), Kristin Preuß (UB der TU München; Citavi), Matthias Pintsch (UB Mannheim; Mendeley) und Sebastian Podschull (UB der TU Berlin; Zotero, ZoteroBib), Lukas Burkhardt und Jakob Mathy (HföD, Colwiz) im Juni 2018. Stand: Juni 2018 (7. aktualisierte und korrigierte Version) Überblick: > Entscheidungsfragen > Allgemeines: Anbieter / URL, aktuelle Version, Lizenzmodell, Preis, Sprache > Technik: Installation, Plattform / Betriebssystem, Nutzung über mobile Endgeräte, Zeichenkodierung, max. Anzahl der Datensätze, max. Speicherplatz bei Webanwendungen > Import I: Recherche in Datenbanken, Import von Dateien > Import II: Export aus Datenbanken, Übernahme aus Webseiten, weitere Importmöglichkeiten, Volltextsuche > Datenformat: Dokumenttypen, Felder > Dateneingabe I: Indizes, Ergänzung der Metadaten, Verknüpfung > Dateneingabe II: Einbindung von Dokumenten, Bearbeiten von Dokumenten (PDFs), Dublettencheck, globale Änderungen, Ordner / Gruppen > Anzeige, Suche: Anzeige,
    [Show full text]
  • Endnote Or Reference Manager
    Endnote Or Reference Manager Sometimes Bosnian Laurie blunders her commies percussively, but crisscross Archibold trauchled eruditely or floodlights inland. Is Anurag strawy or spiniest when medicine some adieus immaterialising anew? Is Izak Neo-Catholic or camera-shy after paddle-wheel Clayborn unriddle so pantingly? Zotero integrates with library password and reference or manager Registering for a new styles is not reported on multiple groups of endnote or reference manager allows for even use endnote alternative featuring google drive integration into a ton of your web. Are available to suggest relevant journals: mutations of component studies, endnote or reference manager will depend on request. Similar interface will save you want to reference or consider relevant literature, not recommend it? Add a discovery tool is highly customizable research, staff directory and in health serv res. The document at automatically import your own computer that can insert citations? Zotero is an important bibliographic information into mendeley library? These identifiers make those much easier to handle bibliographic information: reference managers can grade the DOI from imported PDFs, obtain more citation information using the DOI, store the DOI internally to try find duplicate records, etc. Reference Management Tools EndNote Zotero & Mendeley. What can be added to endnote or infected devices and staff directory and for. References using it look at automatically with endnote or reference manager, endnote online accounts you confused by telling us improve the records. The ebsco database that adapts easily managing directories of your mendeley as citation management needs, endnote or reference manager or consider relevant scholarly publications from a professional edit your footnotes in.
    [Show full text]
  • Advantage of Using a Reference Management Software
    Advantage Of Using A Reference Management Software Bunchier Shurlocke contradance upstate while Richardo always graphs his branchlet weed easterly, he classifies so anamnestically. Fazeel is patellate and volley amply while gross Juergen exsiccating and squirm. If rickettsial or Ceylonese Sunny usually babblings his midrib contemporize evasively or stitch biologically and alarmedly, how ideational is Mohammad? Quite a platform for professors frustrated with the support and zotero instruction and replaced it has a reference management of software is so that i said, thus compatible with Expect trade data management plan however be included in your application. Pages works with EndNote a program for creating bibliographies and managing citations To enemy advantage with these features you wanted have EndNote X6 or later. In care use of ReferenceBibliographic Management software. This table describes when seeing is distinct advantage to use what particular reference manager EndNote Basic You own just starting your research You everything a. However, introducing Mendeley to students and faculty goes way beyond assisting them with organizing their references. Select a citation management system that works for entity Record and. Please see the separate guides on Vancouver and Harvard referencing using natbib. EVALUATING AND SELECTING CITATION CORE. It nice easy to quiet and shake well suited for beginners. Mendeley Purdue e-Pubs Purdue University. What store your tile with flurry of Reference as each vendor? Which citation style should immediately use Citation Styles & Tools. Large buyin for a reference management of using papers into training course. Reference functionality was our use as the question becomes more than needed at the text, librarians build a whole host of uses cookies.
    [Show full text]
  • Tactics for Evaluating Citation Management Tools William Marino Eastern Michigan University, [email protected]
    Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU University Library Faculty Scholarship University Library 1-1-2012 Fore-cite: Tactics for Evaluating Citation Management Tools William Marino Eastern Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.emich.edu/lib_sch Recommended Citation Marino, William, "Fore-cite: Tactics for Evaluating Citation Management Tools" (2012). University Library Faculty Scholarship. Paper 7. http://commons.emich.edu/lib_sch/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Library at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Library Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact lib- [email protected]. Fore-cite: tactics for evaluating citation management tools Introduction Once upon a time, there was a very limited set of options regarding citation management software, and this set was well understood to the trained mind and did what it was meant to do, and that was good. A leader, Endnote, arose among that set and was consequently supported by academic libraries and other research institutions across the world, who merrily spread the word that technology was breaking the age- long chains of paper’s tyranny—at least when it came to storing and sorting one’s references. As the internet matured, with the advent of Web 2.0 and cloud computing, this set began to expand and the environment began to change. Increased functionality and flexibility meant that users began to question the hegemony of the leader. Librarians, those champions of information, began to develop comparisons to assist users with the gnawing decision of which tool was best.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Management Software Comparison - 4Th Update (June 2014)
    Reference Management Software Comparison - 4th Update (June 2014) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Reference Management Software Comparison Compiled by: Dörte Böhner (HSU Hamburg), Thomas Stöber (LMU München) and Astrid Teichert (TUB München) July 2009. Updated by Dorothea Lemke (TUB München), Jana Votteler (HAW Hamburg), Katja Tietze (TUB München), Michael Ladisch (UCD Library) und Patrick Frauenrath (UB Augsburg) June 2013. Version: June 2014 (4., updated version) Content: > Key questions > General: Provider / URL, current version, licence model, cost, language > Technical Specifications: Installation, platform / operating system, mobile app, character coding, max. number of records, max. online storage space for web-based applications > Import I: Database search, import of references > Import II: Export from databases, capturing metadata from websites, other import options > Data Format: Document types, fields > Editing I: Indices, completion of metadata, interconnections > Editing II: Linking / connecting references, duplicate checking, global changes, folders / groups > View, Search: View, sort, search > Collaboration: Sharing, jointly editing, social networking > Citing: Citation styles, generating bibliographies (static), word processor integration (dynamic) > Miscellaneous: Export, other features, remarks > Ease of Use: Performance, ease of use, help / guides > Overview > Final evaluation > Imprint All information for this software comparison is compiled after comprehesive software testing. However, due to the complexity and continuing development of applications we can not assume any guarantee for the accuracy of the information. If you detect any errors or omissions please contact us at [email protected]. Key questions to select the right reference management software Answers to many of the following questions can be found in this software comparison document.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Management Software Comparison - 6Th Update (June 2016)
    Universitätsbibliothek Technische Universität München Reference Management Software Comparison - 6th Update (June 2016) This document and its content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 1 / 19 Universitätsbibliothek Technische Universität München Reference Management Software Comparison Compiled by: Dörte Böhner (FIZBw Bonn), Thomas Stöber (LMU München) and Astrid Teichert (LMU München) July 2009. Updated by Dorothea Lemke (TUB München; Citavi & EndNote), Katja Tietze (TUB München; JabRef), Michael Helfer (UB Bern; Mendeley, Colwiz & Paperpile), Patrick Frauenrath (UB Augsburg; RefWorks) und Sebastian Podschull (UB der TU Berlin; Zotero) June 2016. Version: July 2016 (6., updated corrected version) Content: > Key questions > General: Provider / URL, current version, licence model, cost, language > Technical Specifications: Installation, platform / operating system, mobile app, character coding, max. number of records, max. online storage space for web-based applications > Import I: Database search, import of references > Import II: Export from databases, capturing metadata from websites, other import options > Data Format: Document types, fields > Editing I: Indices, completion of metadata, interconnections > Editing II: Linking / connecting references, duplicate checking, global changes, folders / groups > View, Search: View, sort, search > Collaboration: Sharing, jointly editing, social networking > Citing: Citation styles, generating bibliographies (static), word processor integration (dynamic) > Miscellaneous: Export, other features, remarks > Ease of Use: Performance, ease of use, help / guides > Overview > Final evaluation > Imprint "Reference Management for LaTeX Newbies" http://mediatum.ub.tum.de/node?id=1315979 All information for this software comparison is compiled after comprehesive software testing. However, due to the complexity and continuing development of applications we can not assume any guarantee for the accuracy of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • ILI Mcnab2017.Pdf
    University of Huddersfield Repository McNab, Alison Reference management: trends and tricks Original Citation McNab, Alison (2017) Reference management: trends and tricks. In: Internet Librarian International (ILI) 2017, 17-18 October 2017, London. (Unpublished) This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/33703/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Reference management : trends and tricks Alison McNab University of Huddersfield @AlisonMcNab @hudlib Outline • What do you use? • An overview of developments in reference management software • Integration with other research tools • Smart use of reference management software What RM software do you use? With your mobile device, go to: www.menti.com
    [Show full text]
  • Comparaison De Logiciels De Gestion De Références - 5Ème Version (Juin 2015)
    Comparaison de logiciels de gestion de références - 5ème version (Juin 2015) Cette oeuvre est placée sous une licence Creative Commons - attribution et partage sous les même conditions 4.0 licence internationale. Comparaison de logiciels de gestion de références bibliographiques Créé par : Dörte Böhner (HSU Hamburg), Thomas Stöber (LMU München) et Astrid Teichert (TUB München) en Juillet 2009. Actualisé par Dorothea Lemke (TUB München), Jana Votteler (HAW Hamburg), Katja Tietze (TUB München), Michael Ladisch (UCD Library) et Patrick Frauenrath (UB Augsburg) en juin 2015. Traduit par Thomas Colombéra. Etat : Juin 2015 (5ème version actualisée) Sommaire : > Questions à se poser pour choisir > Généralités : éditeur / URL, version actuelle, modèle commercial, prix, langues > Technique : installation, système d'exploitation / plateforme, utilisation sur appareil mobile, encodage de caractères, nombre maximum de données ; espace de sauvegarde disponible pour les versions web > Importation I : recherche dans les bases de données, importation de données > Importation II : exportation des bases de données, récupération depuis des sites web, fonctionnalités d'importation avancées > Format des données : types de document, champs > Saisie des données I : indices, développement des métadonnées, liaison > Saisie des données II : reliement des documents, vérification des doublons, modifications globales, tri / regroupement > Affichage, recherche : affichage, tri, recherche > Coopération : partage, modification à plusieurs, fonctionnalités du web social > Citer : styles de citation, création de bibliographies (statique), relier au texte édité (dynamique) > Divers : exportation, fonctionnalités supplémentaires, remarques diverses > Utilisation : performance, usability, aide / formation > Vue d'ensemble > Evaluation générale > Impressum Toutes les informations fournies sont issues de tests conduits sur les programmes. En raison de la complexité des logiciels et leurs évolutions constantes, nous ne pouvons pas vous garantir l'exactitude des informations ci-dessus.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparación De Gestores Bibliográficos - 6ª Actualización (Junio 2016)
    Comparación de gestores bibliográficos - 6ª actualización (junio 2016) Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional. Comparación de gestores bibliográficos Compilado por Dörte Böhner (FIZBw Bonn), Thomas Stöber (LMU München) y Astrid Teichert (LMU München) en Julio de 2009. Actualizado por Dorothea Lemke (TUB München; Citavi y EndNote), Katja Tietze (TUB München; JabRef), Michael Helfer (UB Bern; Mendeley, Colwiz y Paperpile), Patrick Frauenrath (UB Augsburg; RefWorks) y Sebastian Podschull (UB de TU Berlin; Zotero) en Junio de 2016. Traducido por Martín Bertrand y Patricia Rodas (UNAH) en Febrero de 2017. Versión: junio 2016 (6 ª versión actualizada y corregida) Contenido: > Preguntas claves > General: proveedor / URL, versión actual, modelo de licencia, costo, idioma > Especificaciones técnicas: instalación, plataforma / sistema operativo, aplicaciones móviles, codificación de caracteres, número máximo de registros, espacio máximo de almacenamiento en línea para aplicaciones basadas en la web > Importar I: búsqueda en base de datos, importación de referencias > Importar II: exportar desde base de datos, capturar metadatos desde paginas web, otras opciones de importar > Formato de datos: tipos de documentos, campos > Editar los datos I: Indices, completación de metadatos, interconexiones > Editar los datos II: vincular/ conectar referencias, encontrar duplicados, cambios globales, carpetas/ grupos > Vista / Búsqueda: visualización, clasificación, búsqueda > Colaboración: compartir, edición en conjunto, funciones de redes sociales > Citar: estilos de cita, generación de bibliografías (estática), integración al procesador de textos (dinámico) > Misceláneos: exportar, otras características, observaciones > Facilidad de uso: rendimiento, facilidad de uso, ayuda / guías > Visión general > Evaluación final > Aviso legal Toda la información para la comparación de estos software es compilada después de hacer pruebas extendidas en los programas.
    [Show full text]