DOCSLIB.ORG

Surface Water Supply of the United States, 1933. Part 11, Pacific Slope Basins in California Nathan Clifford Grover

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surface Water Supply of the United States, 1933. Part 11, Pacific Slope Basins in California Nathan Clifford Grover Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons Federal Documents Government Documents 1935 Surface water supply of the United States, 1933. Part 11, Pacific slope basins in California Nathan Clifford Grover Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/federal_documents Part of the Water Law Commons UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HAROLD L. ICKES, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. MENDENHALL, Director Water-Supply Paper 751 SURFACE WATER SUPPLY of the UNITED STATES 1933 PART 11 PACIFIC SLOPE BASINS IN CALIFORNIA NATHAN C. GROVER, Chief Hydraulic Engineer H. D. McGLASHAN and G. H. CANPIELD District Engineers Prepared in cooperation with THE STATES OF CALIFORNIA AND OREGON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1935 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. - - - Price 30 cents (Paper cover) CONTENTS Page Authorization and scope of work____________---...-._________________ 1 Definition of terms_________________________________________ _ 2 Explanation of data.______________________________ 3 Accuracy of field data and computed results..____________________ _ 4 Publications. _______________________________________________ 5 Cooperation______________^.__ ___________________ ___ _ 10 Division of work ___________________________ _ 10 Gaging-station records.-. ______-________._____-___.._-__-____-_ 12 San Diego River Basin_______._._______________ 12 San Diego River near Santee, Calif________________________ 12 San Dieguito River Basin._________-_______-_____-_---___ 13 San Dieguito River at Lake Hodges, Calif 13 San Luis Rey River Basin_____________________________.. 13 San Luis Rey River at Lake Henshaw, near Mesa Grande, Calif. 13 San Luis Rey River near Bonsall, Calif______________________ 14 San Luis Rey River at Oceanside, Calif______________ _._ 15 Santa Margarita River Basin__ 16 Temecula Creek at Nigger Canyon, near Temecula, Calif. _____ 16 Temecula Creek at Railroad Canyon, near Temecula, Calif___ 17 Santa Margarita River near Fall Brook, Calif__________ _ 18 Santa Margarita River at Ysidora, Calif__-__--_- 19 Murrieta Creek at Temecula, Calif_____________________ 20 O'NeillDitchnear Ysidora, Calif ______________________... 21 San Juan Creek Basin. ___________________________ 22 San Juan Creek at San Juan Capistrano, Calif ______._. 22 Trabuco Creek near San Juan Capistrano, Calif_______ __ __ 23 Aliso Creek Basin______________________________ 23 Aliso Creek at El Toro, Calif _ 23 Santa Ana River Basin__._._________________________ 24 Santa Ana River near Mentone, Calif____________ _ 24 Santa Ana River near San Bernardino, Calif______ 25 Santa Ana River at Riverside Narrows, near Arlington, Calif 26 Santa Ana River at Hafnner Avenue, near Corona, Calif. _ 27 Santa Ana River at Auburndale Bridge, near Corona, Calif __ 28 Santa Ana River at Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway bridge near Prado, Calif____________________________ __ 29 Santa Ana River near Prado, Calif __ _______ _______ 30 Santa Ana River at Santa Ana, Calif. 31 Southern California Edison Co.'s canal and Greenspot pipe line near Mentone, Calif______ _______________ __ 32 Mill Creek near CraftonviUe, Calif___.____________ _ 34 Mill Creek power canals nos. 2 and 3 near Craftonville, Calif___ 36 Mill Creek power canal no. 1 near Craftonville, Calif ______ 37 Plunge Creek near East Highlands, Calif 38 San Timoteo Creek near Redlands, Calif_______--_.__ ____ 39 m IV CONTENTS Gaging-station records Continued. Santa Ana River Basin Continued. Page Warm Creek near Colton, Calif__________________._ 40 Strawberry Creek near Arrowhead Springs, Calif._____________ 42 Waterman Canyon Creek near Arrowhead Springs, Calif____. 43 City Creek near Highland, Calif.____________________ 44 City Creek Water Go's, canal near Highland, Calif ________ 45 Devil Canyon Creek near San Bernardino, Calif._____________ 46 Lytle Creek near Fontana, Calif________-________________ 47 Fontana pipe line near Fontana, Calif_____-___________ 48 Lytle Creek (east channel) at San Bernardino, Calif________ 49 Lytle Creek (west channel) at Colton, Calif__ __ _ _____ 49 Cajon Creek near Keenbrook, Calif______________________ 50 Lone Pine Creek near Keenbrook, Calif__--___-_________ 51 Meeks & Daley Canal near Colton, Calif ________, 52 Day Creek near Etiwanda, Calif _ _ 53 Cucamonga Creek near Upland, Calif_______________________ 54 San Jacinto River near San Jacinto, Calif______________ 55 San Jacinto River near Elsinore, Calif. ____ 56 Elsinore Lake at Elsinore, Calif___ ._ _ 57 Temescal Creek near Corona, Calif____ ____ 57 Chino Creek near Prado, Calif .___ ______ 58 San Antonio Creek near Claremont, Calif__ _ ______ 59 Southern California Edison Go's, canal near Claremont, Calif. 61 Santiago Creek at Santiago Reservoir, near Villa Park, Calif__ 62 Santiago Creek near Villa Park, Calif ______ ________ 63 Santiago Creek at Santa Ana, Calif __ ________ 64 Irvine ranch drainage canal near Tustin, Calif. _____ 65 San Gabriel River Basin.__________________ «. _ 66 San Gabriel River near Camp Bonita, Calif_____ _ _________ 66 San Gabriel River near Azusa, Calif_____---__-______________ 67 San Gabriel River at Pico, Calif______1 _________ 69 West Fork of San Gabriel River at Camp Rincon, Calif ....___ 70 Bear Creek near Camp Rincon, Calif_____ __ ____ 71 North Fork of San Gabriel River at Camp Rincon, Calif. 72 Southern California Edison Go's, canal near Azusa, Calif....... 73 Rogers Creek near Azusa, Calif_-______---_- _____ 74 Fish Creek near Duarte, Calif 75 Sawpit Creek near Monrovia, Calif .-- 76 Monrovia pipe line near Monrovia, Calif ____ 78 San Dimas Creek near San Dimas, Calif _________ _______ 79 Dalton Creek near Glendora, Calif______--_ _ 80 Little Dalton Creek near Glendora, Calif- ____ .. ._. 81 San Jose Creek near Whittier, Calif ______ _____ 82 Brea Creek at Fullerton, Calif _____ _ 83 Carbon Creek at Olinda, Calif __________ 83 XOR Angeles River Basin,__________________ __. 84 Los Angeles River at Los Angeles, Calif , ____ 84 Los Angeles River near Downey, Calif - - _______ 85 Los Angeles River at Long Beach, Calif _____ ___ _____ 86 Pacoima Creek near San Fernando, Calif _______ 87 Tujunga Creek near Colby ranch, Calif ___.____. 88 Tujunga Creek near Sunland, Calif _______ ________ 89 Mill Creek near Colby ranch, Calif-- - 90 CONTENTS V Gaging-station records Continued. Los Angeles River Basin Continued. Page Fox Creek near Colby ranch, Calif-^___________ __________ 91 Little Tujunga Creek near San Fernando, Calif-_ ___________ 92 Haines Creek near Tujunga, Calif.___________---___-------_ 93 Arroyo Seco near Pasadena Calif__-______-___----__---_--_-_ 94 Santa Anita Creek near Sierra Madre, Calif __________________ 95 Little Santa Anita Creek near Sierra Madre, Calif ___________ 96- Eaton Creek near Pasadena, Calif_________________________ 97" Rio Hondo near Montebello, Calif______________________ 98 Rio Hondo near Downey, Calif______-____-___-_-_--__-_--_- 99* Rio Hondo Slough near Montebello, Calif._-__________--__--- 100* Ballona Creek Basin________________________________________ 101 Ballona Creek near Culver City, Calif._____________----__--- 101 Topanga Creek Basin _______________________________________ 102 Topanga Creek near Topanga Beach, Calif _____^_ ____________ 102 Malibu Creek Basin____-__-_--_-__--_-__-__-___--__-____--_-_- 103 Malibu Creek at Crater Camp, near Calabasas, Calif __________ 103 Santa Clara River Basin_------___--_-_--___-________________ 104 Santa Clara River near Saugus, Calif-__--__--____-______--__ 104 Santa Clara River at Montalvo, Calif_____________________ 105 Piru Creek at Piru, Calif_______________-________ 106 Sespe Creek at Sespe, Calif_____________________________ 107 Santa Paula Creek near Santa Paula, Calif ___________________ 108 Ventura River Basin____________________________________ 109 Matilija Creek at Matilija, Calif__________________________ 109 Ventura River near Ventura, Calif__________________________ 110 Santa Ynez River Basin_______________________________________ 111 Santa Ynez River at Juncal Reservoir, near Montecito, Calif___ 111 Santa Ynez River near Santa Barbara, Calif________________ 111 Santa Ynez River below Gibraltar Dam, near Santa Barbara, Calif_______-___-__-_---_----___.___________________ 112 Santa Ynez River near Santa Ynez, Calif ____________________ 113 Santa Ynez River at Solvang, Calif_________________ 114 Santa Ynez River near Lompoc, Calif _______________________ 115 Santa Maria River Basin_____________________________________ 116 Cuyama River near Santa Maria, Calif________________ 116 Huasna River near Santa Maria, Calif___________________ 117 Sisquoc River near Sisquoc, Calif___________________________ 118 Salinas River Basin__ ___________________________ 119 ( Salinas River near Santa Margarita, Calif_ ___ ________ 119 Salinas River near Spreckels, Calif ________________._ 120 San Antonio River at Pleyto, Calif__________________ 121 Arroyo Seco near Soledad, Calif____________________ 122 Pajaro River Basin______________________...__________ 123 Uvas Creek near Morgan Hill, Calif_________________ 123 San Francisquito Creek Basin________________________ 124 San Francisquito Creek at Stanford University, Calif_______ 124 San Francisquito Creek at Palo Alto, Calif___________ 125 Los Trancos Creek at Stanford University, Calif..______ 126 Los Trancos Canal near Stanford University, Calif ________ 127 Lagunita Canal at Stanford University, Calif____________ 128 Stevens Creek Basin___ _______________________ 129 Stevens Creek
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses
    Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses Regulatory_Issues_Trends.doc CHAPTER 2 BENEFICIAL USES INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USES ..........................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE PORTER-COLOGNE WATER QUALITY CONTROL ACT ..1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT .................................................2 BENEFICIAL USE DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................3 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL BENEFICIAL USES ..................................................................................7 BENEFICIAL USES FOR SPECIFIC WATER BODIES ........................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF RARE BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF COLD FRESHWATER HABITAT BENEFICIAL USE ...............................................9 DESIGNATION OF SPAWNING, REPRODUCTION, AND/ OR EARLY DEVELOPMENT (SPWN) BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................................11 SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER POLICY ..................................................................................11 EXCEPTIONS TO THE "SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER" POLICY................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • When Black Plus White Equals Gray: the Nature of Variation in the Variable Seedeater Complex (Emberizinae: Sporophila)
    Volume 7 1996 No.2 ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 7: 75-107, 1996 CiJ'The Neotropical Ornithological Society WHEN BLACK PLUS WHITE EQUALS GRAY: THE NATURE OF VARIATION IN THE VARIABLE SEEDEATER COMPLEX (EMBERIZINAE: SPOROPHILA) F. Gary Stiles Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Apartado 7495, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. Resumen. Las afinidades taxon6micas del Espiguero Variable (Sporophila aurita) yel Espiguero Alifajeado (S. ameri- cana) han sido discutidos por más de 80 años. El descubrimiento de una zona de hibridizaci6n entre el primero y el Espiguero Gris (S. intermedia) -anteriormente no considerado como emparentado debido a que el plumaje definitivo del 0" es gris, no blanco y negro -me estimul6 a reexaminar esta cuesti6n. Mi hip6tesis de trabajo era que existiera una relaci6n estrecha entre todas estas formas. Esta hip6tesis fue apoyada por la gran similitud morfol6gica y las distribuciones casi perfectamente complementarias de todas ellas, la identificaci6n de otra zona de solapamiento y hibridizaci6n limitada, y por la existencia de variaci6n previamente ignorada dentro de la especie intermedia. Concluyo que S. intermedia es un miembro integral del llamado "complejo del Espiguero Variable", y que ésto constituye un grupo monofilético reconocible al nivel de superespecie.Los patrones de distri- buci6n geográfica y divergencia morfol6gica me permiten reconocer los siguientes cuatro aloespecies: S. corvina (Espiguero Variable); S. intermedia (Espiguero Gris); S. murallae (Espiguero del Caquetá); y S. americana (Espigue- ro Alifajeado). Con base en un análises cuantitativo de la variaci6n dentro de S. intermedia, llego a la conclusi6n de que la subespecie agustini no es reconocibre, como tampoco lo es S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorospingus Flavovirens Rediscovered, with Notes on Other Pacific Colombian and Cauca Valley Birds
    CHLOROSPINGUS FLAVOVIRENS REDISCOVERED, WITH NOTES ON OTHER PACIFIC COLOMBIAN AND CAUCA VALLEY BIRDS STEVEN L. HILTY ABSTRACT.--Aspecimen of the Yellow-green Bush Tanager collectedin 1972 was the first Colombianand third known specimensince the previoustwo taken in Ecuadorin 1935,and the specieshas not been reported since. Presentsnotes and new recordsof 36 other speciesfrom this region of high endemismon the westernslopes of the westernAndes.--Department of Ecologyand Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson,Arizona 85721. Accepted2 June 1975. THE Pacific slope of Colombia records the highest annual rainfall in the Western Hemisphere (Rumney 1968), yet the distribution of many birds in this unique region of high endemism is still known chiefly through early collections(e.g. Cassin 1860; Bangs 1908, 1910; Chapman 1917) and the extensive collectionsof Von Sheidern (fide Meyer de Schauensee)during 1938, 1940, 1941, 1945, and 1946. This and other information has been compiledby Meyer de Schauensee(1948-52, 1964, 1966, 1970). Recent papers by Haffer (1967a, 1967b), Miller (1966), Olivares (1957a, 1957b, 1958), and Ralph and Chaplin (1973) contributeto our knowledgeof Pacific Colom- bian avifauna but the status of many speciesis still poorly known. The data reported here were obtained during portions of 1972, 1973 and 1975, chiefly in the AnchicayJ Valley at low to moderate elevationson the west slopeof the westernAndes and in the upper Cauca Valley near Cali, Department of Valle. Llano Bajo, Aguaclara, Saboletas,Danubio, and La Cascada, mentioned in text, are small villagesalong the Old BuenaventuraRoad, southof Buenaventura. Yatacu• is a site administered by the Corporaci6n Aut6noma del Valle del Cauca (C.V.C.) in the upper Anchicay/t Valley above the confluenceof the Rio Digua and Rio An- chicay/t.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary History of the Genus Rhamdia (Teleostei: Pimelodidae) in Central America
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25 (2002) 172–189 www.academicpress.com Evolutionary history of the genus Rhamdia (Teleostei: Pimelodidae) in Central America Anabel Perdices,a,b,* Eldredge Bermingham,a Antonia Montilla,b and Ignacio Doadriob a Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apto. 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama b Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Jose Gutierrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain Received 11 June 2001; received in revised form 2 January 2002 Abstract We constructed phylogenetic hypotheses for Mesoamerican Rhamdia, the only genus of primary freshwater fish represented by sympatric species across Central America. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred from analysis of 1990 base pairs (bp) of mito- chondrial DNA (mtDNA), represented by the complete nucleotide sequences of the cytochrome b (cyt b) and the ATP synthase 8 and 6 (ATPase 8/6) genes. We sequenced 120 individuals from 53 drainages to provide a comprehensive geographic picture of Central American Rhamdia systematics and phylogeography. Phylogeographic analysis distinguished multiple Rhamdia mtDNA lineages, and the geographic congruence across evolutionarily independent Rhamdia clades indicated that vicariance has played a strong role in the Mesoamerican diversification of this genus. Phylogenetic analyses of species-level relationships provide strong support for the monophyly of a trans-Andean clade of three evolutionarily equivalent Rhamdia taxa: R. guatemalensis, R. laticauda, and R. ciner- ascens. Application of fish-based mitochondrial DNA clocks ticking at 1.3–1.5% sequence divergence per million years (Ma), suggests that the split between cis- and trans-Andean Rhamdia extends back about 8 Ma, and the three distinct trans-Andean Rhamdia clades split about 6 Ma ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Tour
    2020 JANUARY 4TH – 12TH, 2020 [Birding Tour] DOMINICAN REPUBLIC (HISPANIOLA) - 'Caribbean's Best Birding' - three endemic families of birds! Both evolution and geography has been 'kind' to the Island of Hispaniola with more 300 species of birds; THREE ENDEMIC FAMILES; six endemic genera; TWENTY-NINE ENDEMIC BIRDS; and 25 endemic subspecies. This is the Caribbean's most important center of avian variety... a 'must-see' birder's destination. Tour Style [B] $3,495/pp [Tour Filled] FEBRUARY 29TH – MARCH 14TH, 2020 [Birding Tour] OAXACA - ‘The Endemics of Mexico’s Southern Highlands, Isthmus of Tehuantepec, & Sierra Los Tuxtlas, Vera Cruz’ More than 50 of Mexico’s endemics occur in Oaxaca’s ‘Southern Highlands.’ This is a stand-alone destination that should be embraced by every birder interested in seeing the key species of Mexico. Tour Style [C] $3,795/pp [Tour Filled] RED WARBLER (Race 'rowleyi' is a Mexican Endemic regularly seen in Oaxaca State) MARCH 16TH – 29TH, 2020 [Birding Tour] CENTRAL MEXICO - ‘Finest Birding Route in North America’ – 450 SPECIES/60 MEXICAN ENDEMICS FOR THE ROUTE Route includes: [1] West Mexican Pacific slope, [2] Sierra Madre del Sur de Guerrero, [3] Balsas River drainage, and [4] Transvolcanic Belt. Tour Style [C] $3,895/pp [Tour Filled] 2020 APRIL 19TH – MAY 3RD, 2020 [Birding Tour]; BULGARIA ‘Classic Spring Birding’ The 2018 Tour recorded 232 species; expect up to 22 warblers, 9 tits, 10 woodpeckers, 5 owls, and 24 raptors, vultures, and falcons. Rare migrant birds mostly arrive from East Africa or West Asia. Food is delightful, travel is easy, accommodations are cozy, and dozens of times each day the scenic countryside shouts ‘photo’.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Summaries
    Appendix A: Watershed Summaries Preface California’s watersheds supply water for drinking, recreation, industry, and farming and at the same time provide critical habitat for a wide variety of animal species. Conceptually, a watershed is any sloping surface that sheds water, such as a creek, lake, slough or estuary. In southern California, rapid population growth in watersheds has led to increased conflict between human users of natural resources, dramatic loss of native diversity, and a general decline in the health of ecosystems. California ranks second in the country in the number of listed endangered and threatened aquatic species. This Appendix is a “working” database that can be supplemented in the future. It provides a brief overview of information on the major hydrological units of the South Coast, and draws from the following primary sources: • The California Rivers Assessment (CARA) database (http://www.ice.ucdavis.edu/newcara) provides information on large-scale watershed and river basin statistics; • Information on the creeks and watersheds for the ESU of the endangered southern steelhead trout from the National Marine Fisheries Service (http://swr.ucsd.edu/hcd/SoCalDistrib.htm); • Watershed Plans from the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) that provide summaries of existing hydrological units for each subregion of the south coast (http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcbs/index.html); • General information on the ecology of the rivers and watersheds of the south coast described in California’s Rivers and Streams: Working
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Steelhead Populations Are in Danger of Extinction Within the Next 25-50 Years, Due to Anthropogenic and Environmental Impacts That Threaten Recovery
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA STEELHEAD Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus Critical Concern. Status Score = 1.9 out of 5.0. Southern steelhead populations are in danger of extinction within the next 25-50 years, due to anthropogenic and environmental impacts that threaten recovery. Since its listing as an Endangered Species in 1997, southern steelhead abundance remains precariously low. Description: Southern steelhead are similar to other steelhead and are distinguished primarily by genetic and physiological differences that reflect their evolutionary history. They also exhibit morphometric differences that distinguish them from other coastal steelhead in California such as longer, more streamlined bodies that facilitate passage more easily in Southern California’s characteristic low flow, flashy streams (Bajjaliya et al. 2014). Taxonomic Relationships: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) historically populated all coastal streams of Southern California with permanent flows, as either resident or anadromous trout, or both. Due to natural events such as fire and debris flows, and more recently due to anthropogenic forces such as urbanization and dam construction, many rainbow trout populations are isolated in remote headwaters of their native basins and exhibit a resident life history. In streams with access to the ocean, anadromous forms are present, which have a complex relationship with the resident forms (see Life History section). Southern California steelhead, or southern steelhead, is our informal name for the anadromous form of the formally designated Southern California Coast Steelhead Distinct Population Segment (DPS). Southern steelhead occurring below man-made or natural barriers were distinguished from resident trout in the Endangered Species Act (ESA) listing, and are under different jurisdictions for purposes of fisheries management although the two forms typically constitute one interbreeding population.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
    4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Establishment of Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus
    Revista Chilena de Historia Natural ISSN: 0716-078X [email protected] Sociedad de Biología de Chile Chile SOTO, DORIS; ARISMENDI, IVÁN; PRINZIO, CECILIA DI; JARA, FERNANDO Establishment of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in Pacific basins of southern South America and its potential ecosystem implications Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, vol. 80, núm. 1, 2007, pp. 81-98 Sociedad de Biología de Chile Santiago, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=369944281007 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative CHINOOK SALMON IN SOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICARevista Chilena de Historia Natural81 80: 81-98, 2007 Establishment of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in Pacific basins of southern South America and its potential ecosystem implications Establecimiento del salmón Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) en cuencas del Pacífico sur de Sudamérica y sus potenciales implicancias ecosistémicas DORIS SOTO1, 2, IVÁN ARISMENDI1, CECILIA DI PRINZIO3 & FERNANDO JARA4 1 Laboratorio de Ecología Acuática, Instituto de Acuicultura, Universidad Austral de Chile, Campus Puerto Montt y Núcleo Milenio FORECOS 2 Present address: Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Service (FIRI), Fisheries Department, FAO of United Nations, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100, Rome, Italy 3 Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Ecología y Sistemática Animal (UNPAT)-CONICET Esquel (Chubut), Argentina 4 Universidad San Sebastián, Puerto Montt, Chile ABSTRACT Salmon and trout species are not native to the southern hemisphere, however rainbow and brown trout have been established a century in southern South America.
    [Show full text]
  • San Dieguito Double Track and Special Events Platform Project Frequently Asked Questions San Dieguito Double Track and Special Events Platform Project
    San Dieguito Double Track and Special Events Platform Project Frequently Asked Questions San Dieguito Double Track and Special Events Platform Project Updated December 13, 2013 Frequently Asked Questions ■ OVERVIEW OF PROJECT 1. What is the purpose of the project? The project will improve a critical part of the 351-mile Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) rail corridor that serves as a vital link for passenger and freight movements in the San Diego region. The San Dieguito Double Track and Special Events Platform Project will increase capacity and improve system reliability by adding a one-mile segment of double track between Solana Beach and Del Mar, resulting in a continuous 2.8-mile-long segment of double track. The project also includes the replacement of the existing 97-year-old San Dieguito River wooden trestle rail bridge and the construction of a new special events platform that would directly serve the Del Mar Fairgrounds. Additional improvements include construction of new turnouts, signals, retained embankments, and drainage facilities. 2. What is the scope of the project? The project’s engineering and environmental analysis process is underway. The environmental compliance is subject to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is the Lead Agency under NEPA. This project is funded through environmental and design, although not funded for construction. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) works to make all projects shovel ready. Although the start date for construction has yet to be determined, the project is planned to be constructed prior to 2030 according to the SANDAG 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Inventory
    Cultural Resources Inventory Santa Ana River Trail Project Phase IV Reaches B & C Redlands San Bernardino County, California Prepared For: San Bernardino County Department of Public Works 825 E. 3rd Street San Bernardino, California 92415 Prepared By: Wendy Blumel, RPA ECORP Consulting, Inc. 215 North 5th Street Redlands, California 92374 Under the direction of Principal Investigator: Roger Mason, Ph.D., RPA September 2018 ECORP Consulting, Inc. has assisted public and private land owners with environmental regulation compliance since 1987. We offer full service capability, from initial baseline environmental studies through environmental planning review, permitting negotiation, liaison to obtain legal agreements, mitigation design, and construction monitoring and reporting. Citation: ECORP Consulting, Inc. 2018. Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the Santa Ana River Trail Project Phase IV, Reaches B and C, Redlands, San Bernardino County. Prepared for the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works, San Bernardino, California. Inventory Report for the Santa Ana River Trail Project Phase IV, Reaches B and C, Redlands MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The County of San Bernardino Regional Parks Department (County) proposes to construct an approximately 3.3-mile-long section of the Santa Ana River Trail (SART) near the southern bank of the Santa Ana River. An archaeological survey was conducted of the Project Area, as determined from project plans, which includes the existing street rights-of-way and portions of undeveloped (vacant) parcels of land in the City of Redlands and in an unincorporated area in San Bernardino County. The cultural study included a cultural resources records search, Sacred Lands File search, field survey, and California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by O Number 414 Thu Axmucanmuum"Ne Okcitynatural HITORY March 24, 1930
    AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by o Number 414 THu AxmucANMuum"Ne okCityNATURAL HITORY March 24, 1930 59.82 (728.1) STUDIES FROM THE DWIGHT COLLECTION OF GUATEMALA BIRDS. II BY LUDLOW GRISCOM This is the second' preliminary paper, containing descriptions of new forms in the Dwight Collection, or revisions of Central American birds, based almost entirely on material in The American Museum of Natural History. As usual, all measuremenits are in millimeters, and technical color-terms follow Ridgway's nomenclature. The writer would appreciate prompt criticism from his colleagues, for inclusion in the final report. Cerchneis sparveria,tropicalis, new subspecies SUBSPECIFIC CHARACTERS.-Similar to typical Cerchneis sparveria (Linnleus) of "Carolina," but much smaller and strikingly darker colored above in all ages and both sexes; adult male apparently without rufous crown-patch and only a faint tinge of fawn color on the chest; striping of female below a darker, more blackish brown; wing of males, 162-171, of females, 173-182; in size nearest peninularis Mearns of southern Lower California, which, however, is even paler than phalena of the southwestern United States. TYPE.-No. 57811, Dwight Collection; breeding male; Antigua, Guatemala; May 20, 1924; A. W. Anthony. MATERIAL EXAMINED Cerchneis sparveria spar'eria.-Several hundred specimens from most of North America, e.tern Mexico and Central America, including type of C. s. guatemalenis Swann from Capetillo, Guatemala. Cerchneis sparveria phalkna.-Over one hundred specimens from the south- western United States and western Mexico south to Durango. Cerchneis sparveria tropicalis.-Guatemala: Antigua, 2 e ad., 1 6" imm., 2 9 ad., 1 9 fledgeling.
    [Show full text]