THE MINERALOGY of the Mapiml' MINING DISTRICT, DURANGO

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE MINERALOGY of the Mapiml' MINING DISTRICT, DURANGO The mineralogy of the Mapimí mining district, Durango, Mexico Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Hoffmann, Victor Joseph 1935- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 05/10/2021 08:35:35 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565169 THE MINERALOGY OF THE MAPIMl' MINING DISTRICT, DURANGO, MEXICO by Victor Joseph Hoffmann A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 8 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by _________ Victor Joseph Hoffmann____________________ entitled The Mineralogy of the Mapimi Mining District,______ Durango, Mexico______________________________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy_______________________________ ____________ ‘7/2 __________________ Dissertation Director^/ Date z / ~ After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* f , A> Q ~/ w n n rT 2.7, 7 / f / 7 u Z Z /9<$7 •fs---------- - ' -------7 This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination. STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author thanks Professors John W. Anthony, under whose direction this study was made, Evans B. Mayo, Spencer R. Titley and John M. Guilbert, for their many helpful suggestions, criticism, and detailed examination of the manuscript. The author also wishes to thank Drs. F. F. Apian, H. Schweigart and Mr. R. L. Labosky for their assistance with many of the mineralogical and chemical aspects of the study. The author is indebted to the Mexican Government for permission to collect at the mines and to take the samples from their country for study. Many of the residents of Mapimjf and miners were most helpful in obtaining samples from the mines and offered information on the mine locations and their access. Mr. Salvador Davila of Mapimi assisted the author with the collection of samples and acted as an interpreter and guide. The author is also indebted to Union Carbide Corporation for the use of their equipment and supplies and for many chemical analyses. iii Many mineral specimens were obtained from the Smithsonian Institution from both the collections of Ojuela mine specimens obtained by Foshag in 1934 and from the more recent acquisitions. Mr. John S. White of the Smithsonian staff was most helpful in locating these cataloged samples for use in the study. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS lx LIST OF TABLES XIU ABSTRACT XVI INTRODUCTION 1 Methods of Investigation 2 Previous Investigation 3 Location and Accessibility 4 Climate and Vegetation 6 Physiography .7 History 9 Production and Present Mining 12 STRUCTURE AND PETROLOGY 21 PRIMARY MINERALIZATION 31 ZONING 43 DESCRIPTION OF INDIVIDUAL MINERALS 46 bismuth 46 copper 46 gold 47 silver 48 sulfur 48 cerargyrite 49 fluorite 50 nantockite 51 bindheimite 51 braunite 54 chalcophanite 55 V vi TABLE OF CONTENTS— Continued Page DESCRIPTION OF INDIVIDUAL MINERALS (Contd.) cryptomelane 55 cuprite 55 delafossite 56 goethite 56 groutite 57 hausmannite 57 hematite 58 hydrohausmannite 59 hydrohetaerolite 59 lepidocrosite 60 litharge 60 magnetite 60 raanganite 61 minium 61 molybdic ochre 62 murdockite 62 plattnerite 62 psilomelane 63 pyrolusite 64 ramsdellite 64 stibiconite 64 tenorite 66 valentinite 66 cassiterite 67 arsenopyrite 67 berzelianite 69 clausthalite 71 bismuthinite 71 boulangerite 71 bornite 72 chalcocite 72 chalcopyrite 73 covellite 73 emplectite 75 enargite 75 galena 77 jamesonite 78 marcasite 80 molybdenite 80 pyargyrite 82 pyrite 82 pyrrhotite 83 vii TABLE OF CONTENTS— Continued Page DESCRIPTION OF INDIVIDUAL MINERALS (Contd.) sphalerite 83 stannite 84 stibnite 85 tetrahedrite 86 tennantite 86 umangite 87 ankerite 87 aragonite 87 aurichalcite 88 azurite 90 calcite 90 cerussite 91 dolomite 93 hydrozincite 93 malachite 94 rhodochrosite 95 rosasite 95 siderite 96 smithsonite 96 anglesite 98 barite 98 brochantite 99 celestite 100 chalcanthite 100 copiapite 102 gypsum 103 hydrous sulfates 104 jarosite 112 melanterite 114 plumbojarosite 114 adamite 116 apatite 121 arseniosiderite 123 austinite 125 carminite 126 chenevixite 128 conichalcite-cuprian austinite 129 crandellite 134 descloizite 134 duftite -j3 136 dussertite 138 ferrimolybdite 140 viii TABLE OF CONTENTS— Continued Page DESCRIPTION OF INDIVIDUAL MINERALS (Contd.) hedyphane 140 koettigite 142 legrandite 142 mimetite-pyromorphite 146 paradamite 148 scorodite 151 vanadinite 153 whitlockite 154 wulfenite 155 chrysocolla 157 hemimorphite 158 kaolinite 160 quartz 161 sauconite 162 PARAGENESIS 163 MINE WATERS 173 STABILITY RELATIONS OF MINERALS IN THE 184 OXIDIZED ZONE SOURCE OF ELEMENTS IN THE OXIDATION ENVIRONMENT 217 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ' 223 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Location of study area 5 2. The Bufa de Mapimi as seen from the road 8 leading to the America Dos Mine showing the massive bedding of the Aurora Limestone 3. The city of Mapimi as seen from the prospect 8 pits near the El Padre Mine. (La Esperanza) 4. View of the suspension bridge that connects 11 the mines of Ojuela with those to the south 5. The abandoned town of Ojuela, looking north 15 6. The headframe and loading bins at the 15 America Dos Mine 7. A view of Ojuela and the headframe of the 18 Socavon shaft 8. A view of Ojuela during the period of 19 active mining (1908) 9• A similar view of Ojuela as above taken in 19 1965 10. The Sarnoso stock, looking south from the 25 northern contact with the limestone 11. The manganese ore deposits near San Pedro 25 12. Cross section - the 0juela-Paloma ore body 36 13. Cross section - the San Jorge-San Juan 36 ore bodies 14. Cross section - the Cumbres ore body 38 15. Cross section - the Cumbres ore body 38 16. Photomicrograph showing the alteration 53 of boulangerite to jamesonite to bindheimite and goethite ix X LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS— Continued Figure Page 17. Photomicrograph of arsenopyrite from lower 70 sulfide zone at America Dos mine. Uncrossed nicols 18a. Photomicrograph showing the alteration of chalcopyrite and galena to covellite. Nicols uncrossed-oil. immersion-green filter 18b. Same field as above - crossed nicols 19. Photomicrograph showing the replacement of clausthalite by emplectite • and bismuth, Nicols uncrossed-oil immersion-blue filter 20a. Photomicrograph showing the alteration of boulangerite to jamesonite along fractures. Nicols uncrossed-oil immersion-blue filter 20b. Same field as above. Crossed nicols-oil immersion- blue filter 21. Photomicrograph showing the pseudomorphic 81 replacement of enargite by marcasite 22. Photomicrograph showing umangite and chalcopyrite 81 in sphalerite 23. Aurichalcite on a matrix of goethite 89 24. Radiating clusters of aurichalcite growing on 89 hydrozincite 25. Photograph of cerussite twinned on {110 } and 92 {130} on a matrix of rosasite and nantpckite 26. Photograph of a cluster of adamite on 118 limonitic matrix 27. Photograph of cuprian adamite on calcite from 118 the America Dos mine 28. Photograph showing fibrous-appearing 124 arseniosiderite with hemimorphite 29. Photograph of a small pocket of carminite 124 crystals from a sample taken from a dump near the Socavon shaft xi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS— Continued Figure Page 30. Photograph of a crust of conichalcite 131 31. Photograph of botryoidal crusts of brownish- 131 green duftite-p with calcite 32. Photograph of small crystalline mass of 143 koettigite on a limonitic matrix 33. Photograph of a radiating cluster of 143 legrandite crystals in a small vug in goethite 34. Photograph of mimetite with cuprian 147 austinite 35. Photograph of paradamite 147 36. Photograph of a cluster of lath shaped 159 hemimorphite crystals 37. Paragenesis of Primary Minerals at Ojuela 166 38. Paragenesis of Secondary Minerals at Ojuela 167 39. Photomicrograph showing the alteration of 168 cryptomelane to pyrolusite 40. Photomicrograph showing euhedral 168 hydrohetaerolite crystals with small band of hydrohausmannite (?) 41. Photograph of veinlet of groutite in 169 pyrolusite 42. Paragenesis of Minerals from San Pedro 170 43. Photomicrograph showing pyrrhotite, stannite, 169 galena, enargite, bismuth, and bismuthinite 44. Paragenesis of Minerals from the Monterrey 172 mine 45. Plot of Eh vs. pH of mine waters 174 Xll LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS— Continued Figure Page 47. Eh-pH characteristics of natural mine waters 181 distinguishing between waters from the primary ores and those draining oxidized ores 48. Plot of SO^ vs. pH 182 49. Plot of CO2 vs. pH 183 50. Eh-pH diagram of the system. h 2o -c 188 51. Eh-pH diagram of the system, Hg-S-Og 189 52. Eh-pH diagram of the system, Cu-S—C—H2O 193 53. Eh-pH diagram of the system, Pb-S-C-H20 197 54.
Recommended publications
  • Mg2sio4) in a H2O-H2 Gas DANIEL TABERSKY1, NORMAN LUECHINGER2, SAMUEL S
    Goldschmidt2013 Conference Abstracts 2297 Compacted Nanoparticles for Evaporation behavior of forsterite Quantification in LA-ICPMS (Mg2SiO4) in a H2O-H2 gas DANIEL TABERSKY1, NORMAN LUECHINGER2, SAMUEL S. TACHIBANA1* AND A. TAKIGAWA2 2 2 1 , HALIM , MICHAEL ROSSIER AND DETLEF GÜNTHER * 1 Department of Natural History Sciences, Hokkaido 1ETH Zurich, Department of Chemistry and Applied University, N10 W8, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan. Biosciences, Laboratory of Inorganic Chemistry (*correspondence: [email protected]) (*correspondence: [email protected]) 2Carnegie Institution of Washington, Department of Terrestrial 2Nanograde, Staefa, Switzerland Magnetism, 5241 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington DC, 20015 USA. Gray et al. did first studies of LA-ICPMS in 1985 [1]. Ever since, extensive research has been performed to Forsterite (Mg2SiO4) is one of the most abundant overcome the problem of so-called “non-stoichiometric crystalline silicates in extraterrestrial materials and in sampling” and/or analysis, the origins of which are commonly circumstellar environments, and its evaporation behavior has referred to as elemental fractionation (EF). EF mainly consists been intensively studied in vacuum and in the presence of of laser-, transport- and ICP-induced effects, and often results low-pressure hydrogen gas [e.g., 1-4]. It has been known that in inaccurate analyses as pointed out in, e.g. references [2,3]. the evaporation rate of forsterite is controlled by a A major problem that has to be addressed is the lack of thermodynamic driving force (i.e., equilibrium vapor reference materials. Though the glass series of NIST SRM 61x pressure), and the evaporation rate increases linearly with 1/2 have been the most commonly reference material used in LA- pH2 in the presence of hydrogen gas due to the increase of ICPMS, heterogeneities have been reported for some sample the equilibrium vapor pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • L. Jahnsite, Segelerite, and Robertsite, Three New Transition Metal Phosphate Species Ll. Redefinition of Overite, an Lsotype Of
    American Mineralogist, Volume 59, pages 48-59, 1974 l. Jahnsite,Segelerite, and Robertsite,Three New TransitionMetal PhosphateSpecies ll. Redefinitionof Overite,an lsotypeof Segelerite Pnur BnnN Moone Thc Departmcntof the GeophysicalSciences, The Uniuersityof Chicago, Chicago,Illinois 60637 ilt. lsotypyof Robertsite,Mitridatite, and Arseniosiderite Peur BmaN Moonp With Two Chemical Analvsesbv JUN Iro Deryrtrnent of GeologicalSciences, Haraard Uniuersity, Cambridge, Massrchusetts 02 I 38 Abstract Three new species,-jahnsite, segelerite, and robertsite,-occur in moderate abundance as late stage products in corroded triphylite-heterosite-ferrisicklerite-rockbridgeite masses, associated with leucophosphite,hureaulite, collinsite, laueite, etc.Type specimensare from the Tip Top pegmatite, near Custer, South Dakota. Jahnsite, caMn2+Mgr(Hro)aFe3+z(oH)rlPC)oln,a 14.94(2),b 7.14(l), c 9.93(1)A, p 110.16(8)", P2/a, Z : 2, specific gavity 2.71, biaxial (-), 2V large, e 1.640,p 1.658,t l.6lo, occurs abundantly as striated short to long prismatic crystals, nut brown, yellow, yellow-orange to greenish-yellowin color.Formsarec{001},a{100},il2oll, jl2}ll,ft[iol],/tolll,nt110],andz{itt}. Segeierite,CaMg(HrO)rFes+(OH)[POdz, a 14.826{5),b 18.751(4),c7.30(1)A, Pcca, Z : 8, specific gaavity2.67, biaxial (-), 2Ylarge,a 1.618,p 1.6t5, z 1.650,occurs sparingly as striated yellow'green prismaticcrystals, with c[00], r{010}, nlll0l and qll2l } with perfect {010} cleavage'It is the Feg+-analogueofoverite; a restudy on type overite revealsthe spacegroup Pcca and the ideal formula CaMg(HrO)dl(OH)[POr]r. Robertsite,carMna+r(oH)o(Hro){Ponlr, a 17.36,b lg.53,c 11.30A,p 96.0o,A2/a, Z: 8, specific gravity3.l,T,cleavage[l00] good,biaxial(-) a1.775,8 *t - 1.82,2V-8o,pleochroismextreme (Y, Z = deep reddish brown; 17 : pale reddish-pink), @curs as fibrous massesand small wedge- shapedcrystals showing c[001 f , a{1@}, qt031}.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Minerals Checklist
    Division of Geology and Earth Resources MS 47007; Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Washington State 360-902-1450; 360-902-1785 fax E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geology Minerals Checklist Note: Mineral names in parentheses are the preferred species names. Compiled by Raymond Lasmanis o Acanthite o Arsenopalladinite o Bustamite o Clinohumite o Enstatite o Harmotome o Actinolite o Arsenopyrite o Bytownite o Clinoptilolite o Epidesmine (Stilbite) o Hastingsite o Adularia o Arsenosulvanite (Plagioclase) o Clinozoisite o Epidote o Hausmannite (Orthoclase) o Arsenpolybasite o Cairngorm (Quartz) o Cobaltite o Epistilbite o Hedenbergite o Aegirine o Astrophyllite o Calamine o Cochromite o Epsomite o Hedleyite o Aenigmatite o Atacamite (Hemimorphite) o Coffinite o Erionite o Hematite o Aeschynite o Atokite o Calaverite o Columbite o Erythrite o Hemimorphite o Agardite-Y o Augite o Calciohilairite (Ferrocolumbite) o Euchroite o Hercynite o Agate (Quartz) o Aurostibite o Calcite, see also o Conichalcite o Euxenite o Hessite o Aguilarite o Austinite Manganocalcite o Connellite o Euxenite-Y o Heulandite o Aktashite o Onyx o Copiapite o o Autunite o Fairchildite Hexahydrite o Alabandite o Caledonite o Copper o o Awaruite o Famatinite Hibschite o Albite o Cancrinite o Copper-zinc o o Axinite group o Fayalite Hillebrandite o Algodonite o Carnelian (Quartz) o Coquandite o o Azurite o Feldspar group Hisingerite o Allanite o Cassiterite o Cordierite o o Barite o Ferberite Hongshiite o Allanite-Ce o Catapleiite o Corrensite o o Bastnäsite
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovery of the Elements — a Historical Sketch of the Discoveries
    REDISCOVERY OF THE ELEMENTS — A HISTORICAL SKETCH OF THE DISCOVERIES TABLE OF CONTENTS incantations. The ancient Greeks were the first to Introduction ........................1 address the question of what these principles 1. The Ancients .....................3 might be. Water was the obvious basic 2. The Alchemists ...................9 essence, and Aristotle expanded the Greek 3. The Miners ......................14 philosophy to encompass a obscure mixture of 4. Lavoisier and Phlogiston ...........23 four elements — fire, earth, water, and air — 5. Halogens from Salts ...............30 as being responsible for the makeup of all 6. Humphry Davy and the Voltaic Pile ..35 materials of the earth. As late as 1777, scien- 7. Using Davy's Metals ..............41 tific texts embraced these four elements, even 8. Platinum and the Noble Metals ......46 though a over-whelming body of evidence 9. The Periodic Table ................52 pointed out many contradictions. It was taking 10. The Bunsen Burner Shows its Colors 57 thousands of years for mankind to evolve his 11. The Rare Earths .................61 thinking from Principles — which were 12. The Inert Gases .................68 ethereal notions describing the perceptions of 13. The Radioactive Elements .........73 this material world — to Elements — real, 14. Moseley and Atomic Numbers .....81 concrete basic stuff of this universe. 15. The Artificial Elements ...........85 The alchemists, who devoted untold Epilogue ..........................94 grueling hours to transmute metals into gold, Figs. 1-3. Mendeleev's Periodic Tables 95-97 believed that in addition to the four Aristo- Fig. 4. Brauner's 1902 Periodic Table ...98 telian elements, two principles gave rise to all Fig. 5. Periodic Table, 1925 ...........99 natural substances: mercury and sulfur.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Zincian Malachite Synthesis by Low Temperature Co
    Evolution of zincian malachite synthesis by low temperature co- precipitation and its catalytic impact on the methanol synthesis Leon Zwienera, Frank Girgsdiesa, Daniel Brenneckea, Detre Teschnera,b, Albert G.F. Machokeb, Robert Schlögla,b, and Elias Frei*a [a] Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, Faradayweg 4-6, 14195 Berlin, Germany. [b] Department of Heterogeneous Reactions, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Stiftstrasse 34 – 36, 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany. *E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: zincian malachite • co-precipitation • methanol synthesis Abstract: Low temperature co-precipitation enabled, for the first time, the preparation of phase pure zincian malachite precursors with Zn contents of up to 31 at.-%. The high Zn content was beneficial for maximizing the dispersion of Cu and oxygen defect sites on the ZnO surface. Further, an increase of the Zn loading from 10 to 31 at.-% doubled the specific surface areas obtained from N2O-RFC (Reactive Frontal Chromatography) and H2- TA (Transient Adsorption). As the Zn content was increased from 10 to 31 at.-%, the apparent activation energy for methanol formation was strongly decreased. Furthermore, water formation was reduced indicating a retardation of the rWGS in favor of methanol formation at high Zn loadings. Additionally, compared to high temperature co-precipitation, low temperature precipitated catalysts exhibited increased catalytic activities. 1. Introduction Rising global energy demand, relying on the ongoing consumption of fossil fuels, has led to a drastic increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration over the past century.[1] Since CO2 has been attributed to be the main anthropogenic source of the greenhouse effect, CO2 has become a valuable carbon source available for chemical conversion (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Koritnigite Zn(Aso3oh)•
    Koritnigite Zn(AsO3OH) • H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Triclinic, pseudomonoclinic. Point Group: 1. As imperfect platy crystals, to 5 mm, in aggregates. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {010}, perfect; cleavage traces k [001] and k [100], visible on {010}. Tenacity: Flexible. Hardness = 2 D(meas.) = 3.54 D(calc.) = 3.56 Optical Properties: Transparent. Color: Colorless, white, rose. Luster: Pearly on {010}. Optical Class: Biaxial (+). Orientation: X = b; Y ∧ a ' 28◦; Z ∧ c ' 22◦. α = 1.632(5) β = 1.652(3) γ = 1.693(3) 2V(meas.) = 70(5)◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P 1. a = 7.948(2) b = 15.829(5) c = 6.668(2) α =90.86(2)◦ β =96.56(2)◦ γ =90.05(2)◦ Z=8 X-ray Powder Pattern: Tsumeb, Namibia; very close to cobaltkoritnigite. 7.90 (10), 3.16 (9), 3.83 (7), 2.461 (6), 2.186 (5), 3.95 (4), 2.926 (4) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) As2O5 51.75 54.67 51.46 FeO + Fe2O3 trace 0.05 CoO 4.54 NiO 2.44 ZnO 35.97 25.83 36.44 MgO trace H2O [12.3] [12.47] 12.10 Total [100.0] [100.00] 100.00 2− (1) Tsumeb, Namibia; by electron microprobe, (AsO3OH) confirmed by IR, H2O by difference. • (2) J´achymov, Czech Republic; H2O by difference. (3) Zn(AsO3OH) H2O. Occurrence: A secondary mineral of the lower oxidation zone in a dolostone-hosted polymetallic hydrothermal ore deposit (Tsumeb, Namibia). Association: Tennantite, cuprian adamite, stranskiite, lavendulan, k¨ottigite,tsumcorite, prosperite, o’danielite (Tsumeb, Namibia); erythrite, arsenolite, sphalerite (J´achymov, Czech Republic).
    [Show full text]
  • Aurichalcite (Zn, Cu)5(CO3)2(OH)6 C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Aurichalcite (Zn, Cu)5(CO3)2(OH)6 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic, pseudo-orthorhombic by twinning. Point Group: 2/m. As acicular to lathlike crystals with prominent {010}, commonly striated k [001], with wedgelike terminations, to 3 cm. Typically in tufted divergent sprays or spherical aggregates, may be in thick crusts; rarely columnar, laminated or granular. Twinning: Observed in X-ray patterns. Physical Properties: Cleavage: On {010} and {100}, perfect. Tenacity: “Fragile”. Hardness = 1–2 D(meas.) = 3.96 D(calc.) = 3.93–3.94 Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Pale green, greenish blue, sky-blue; colorless to pale blue, pale green in transmitted light. Luster: Silky to pearly. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Pleochroism: Weak; X = colorless; Y = Z = blue-green. Orientation: X = b; Y ' a; Z ' c. Dispersion: r< v; strong. α = 1.654–1.661 β = 1.740–1.749 γ = 1.743–1.756 2V(meas.) = Very small. Cell Data: Space Group: P 21/m. a = 13.82(2) b = 6.419(3) c = 5.29(3) β = 101.04(2)◦ Z=2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Mapim´ı,Mexico. 6.78 (10), 2.61 (8), 3.68 (7), 2.89 (4), 2.72 (4), 1.827 (4), 1.656 (4) Chemistry: (1) CO2 16.22 CuO 19.87 ZnO 54.01 CaO 0.36 H2O 9.93 Total 100.39 (1) Utah; corresponds to (Zn3.63Cu1.37)Σ=5.00(CO3)2(OH)6. Occurrence: In the oxidized zones of copper and zinc deposits. Association: Rosasite, smithsonite, hemimorphite, hydrozincite, malachite, azurite.
    [Show full text]
  • Mottramite Pbcu(VO4)(OH) C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1 Crystal Data: Orthorhombic
    Mottramite PbCu(VO4)(OH) c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Orthorhombic. Point Group: 2/m 2/m 2/m. As crystals, equant or dipyramidal {111}, prismatic [001] or [100], with {101}, {201}, many others, to 3 mm, in drusy crusts, botryoidal, usually granular to compact, massive. Physical Properties: Fracture: Small conchoidal to uneven. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 3–3.5 D(meas.) = ∼5.9 D(calc.) = 6.187 Optical Properties: Transparent to nearly opaque. Color: Grass-green, olive-green, yellow- green, siskin-green, blackish brown, nearly black. Streak: Yellowish green. Luster: Greasy. Optical Class: Biaxial (–), rarely biaxial (+). Pleochroism: Weak to strong; X = Y = canary-yellow to greenish yellow; Z = brownish yellow. Orientation: X = c; Y = b; Z = a. Dispersion: r> v,strong; rarely r< v.α= 2.17(2) β = 2.26(2) γ = 2.32(2) 2V(meas.) = ∼73◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P nma. a = 7.667–7.730 b = 6.034–6.067 c = 9.278–9.332 Z=4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Mottram St. Andrew, England; close to descloizite. 3.24 (vvs), 5.07 (vs), 2.87 (vs), 2.68 (vs), 2.66 (vs), 2.59 (vs), 1.648 (vs) Chemistry: (1) (2) (1) (2) CrO3 0.50 ZnO 0.31 10.08 P2O5 0.24 PbO 55.64 55.30 As2O5 1.33 H2O 3.57 2.23 V2O5 21.21 22.53 insol. 0.17 CuO 17.05 9.86 Total 100.02 100.00 (1) Bisbee, Arizona, USA; average of three analyses. (2) Pb(Cu, Zn)(VO4)(OH) with Zn:Cu = 1:1.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimsonite, Pbfe23+(PO4)
    Mineralogical Magazine, October 2016, Vol. 80(6), pp. 925–935 3+ Crimsonite, PbFe2 (PO4)2(OH)2, the phosphate analogue of carminite from the Silver Coin mine, Valmy, Nevada, USA 1,* 2 3 4 A. R. KAMPF ,P.M.ADAMS ,S.J.MILLS AND B. P. NASH 1 Mineral Sciences Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA 2 126 South Helberta Avenue #2, Redondo Beach, California 90277, USA 3 Geosciences, Museum Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne 3001, Victoria, Australia 4 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA [Received 28 May 2015; Accepted 10 September 2015; Associate Editor: Ian Graham] ABSTRACT 3þ Crimsonite (IMA2014-095), PbFe2 (PO4)2(OH)2, the phosphate analogue of carminite, is a new mineral from the Silver Coin mine, Valmy, Iron Point district, Humboldt County, Nevada, USA, where it occurs as a low-temperature secondary mineral in association with fluorwavellite, goethite, hematite, hentschelite, plumbogummite and variscite on quartz. Crimsonite occurs in subparallel aggregates of deep red blades or plates flattened on {100} and up to 0.1 mm in maximum dimension. The streak is light purplish orange. Crystals are transparent and have adamantine lustre. The Mohs hardness is ∼3½, the tenacity is brittle, the fracture is irregular to splintery and an imperfect cleavage is likely on {101}. The calculated density is 5.180 g/cm3. Crimsonite is optically biaxial (+), with 2V = 85.5(5)° and γ – α = 0.011. Using the Gladstone- Dale relationship, the calculated indices of refraction are α = 2.021, β = 2.026 and γ = 2.032.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of Chrysocolla and Secondary Copper Phosphates in the Highly Weathered Supergene Zones of Some Australian Deposits
    Records of the Australian Museum (2001) Vol. 53: 49–56. ISSN 0067-1975 Formation of Chrysocolla and Secondary Copper Phosphates in the Highly Weathered Supergene Zones of Some Australian Deposits MARTIN J. CRANE, JAMES L. SHARPE AND PETER A. WILLIAMS School of Science, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC NSW 1797, Australia [email protected] (corresponding author) ABSTRACT. Intense weathering of copper orebodies in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia has produced an unusual suite of secondary copper minerals comprising chrysocolla, azurite, malachite and the phosphates libethenite and pseudomalachite. The phosphates persist in outcrop and show a marked zoning with libethenite confined to near-surface areas. Abundant chrysocolla is also found in these environments, but never replaces the two secondary phosphates or azurite. This leads to unusual assemblages of secondary copper minerals, that can, however, be explained by equilibrium models. Data from the literature are used to develop a comprehensive geochemical model that describes for the first time the origin and geochemical setting of this style of economically important mineralization. CRANE, MARTIN J., JAMES L. SHARPE & PETER A. WILLIAMS, 2001. Formation of chrysocolla and secondary copper phosphates in the highly weathered supergene zones of some Australian deposits. Records of the Australian Museum 53(1): 49–56. Recent exploitation of oxide copper resources in Australia these deposits are characterized by an abundance of the has enabled us to examine supergene mineral distributions secondary copper phosphates libethenite and pseudo- in several orebodies that have been subjected to intense malachite associated with smaller amounts of cornetite and weathering.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mineral Names*,†
    American Mineralogist, Volume 106, pages 1360–1364, 2021 New Mineral Names*,† Dmitriy I. Belakovskiy1, and Yulia Uvarova2 1Fersman Mineralogical Museum, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy Prospekt 18 korp. 2, Moscow 119071, Russia 2CSIRO Mineral Resources, ARRC, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington, Western Australia 6151, Australia In this issue This New Mineral Names has entries for 11 new species, including 7 minerals of jahnsite group: jahnsite- (NaMnMg), jahnsite-(NaMnMn), jahnsite-(CaMnZn), jahnsite-(MnMnFe), jahnsite-(MnMnMg), jahnsite- (MnMnZn), and whiteite-(MnMnMg); lasnierite, manganflurlite (with a new data for flurlite), tewite, and wumuite. Lasnierite* the LA-ICP-MS analysis, but their concentrations were below detec- B. Rondeau, B. Devouard, D. Jacob, P. Roussel, N. Stephant, C. Boulet, tion limits. The empirical formula is (Ca0.59Sr0.37)Ʃ0.96(Mg1.42Fe0.54)Ʃ1.96 V. Mollé, M. Corre, E. Fritsch, C. Ferraris, and G.C. Parodi (2019) Al0.87(P2.99Si0.01)Ʃ3.00(O11.41F0.59)Ʃ12 based on 12 (O+F) pfu. The strongest lines of the calculated powder X-ray diffraction pattern are [dcalc Å (I%calc; Lasnierite, (Ca,Sr)(Mg,Fe)2Al(PO4)3, a new phosphate accompany- ing lazulite from Mt. Ibity, Madagascar: an example of structural hkl)]: 4.421 (83; 040), 3.802 (63, 131), 3.706 (100; 022), 3.305 (99; 141), characterization from dynamic refinement of precession electron 2.890 (90; 211), 2.781 (69; 221), 2.772 (67; 061), 2.601 (97; 023). It diffraction data on submicrometer sample. European Journal of was not possible to perform powder nor single-crystal X-ray diffraction Mineralogy, 31(2), 379–388.
    [Show full text]