DOCSLIB.ORG

George, Charlotte, Prince of Cambridge (2013–)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Kings and Queens of Canada: The Crown in The Canadian Royal Family History HENRY VII (1457–1509). Giovanni Caboto (John Cabot) crossed the Atlantic Ocean and explored the Charles d’Orléans, Comte d’Angoulême coast of Newfoundland in 1497. (1459–1496). Marguerite de Navarre (1492–1549). HENRY VIII (1491–1547). Married Henri II, King of Navarre. Wrote FRANÇOIS I (1494–1547). Margaret Tudor Commissioned John Rut to a collection of short stories, including Patron and sponsor of Verrazzano’s voyage (1489–1541). command a Northwest passage one based on the life of Marguerite to Newfoundland in 1524. Sent Cartier Married James IV, expedition in 1527. Rut explored de La Rocque de Robertval, who was to explore the St. Lawrence River in 1534 King of Scots the coast of Labrador in 1527. abandoned on an island off the and sent Roberval to settle Canada in 1541. (1503). coast of Québec. HENRI II (1519–1559). EDWARD VI (1537–1553). MARY I (1516–1558). ELIZABETH I, “The Virgin Jeanne II, André de Thevet, the Married Philip II of Spain, Queen” (1533–1603). James V, reine de Navarre first historian to describe ruler of the Spanish Empire Financed the first voyage of King of Scots (1528–1572). America, was appointed in North and South America. Sir Martin Frobisher in 1576. (1512–1542). Married Antoine royal cosmographer during Mary became the first female In 1578, Sir Humphrey Gilbert de Bourbon. Henri II reign and served four monarch of Canada to obtained letters-patent from consecutive French kings. reign in her own right Queen Elizabeth, empowering (Queen Regnant). him to discover and possess any lands in North America then unsettled. CHARLES IX (1550–1574). HENRI III (1551–1589). Philip II of Spain HENRI IV, “The Great” (1553–1610). Attempted to establish a Encouraged the exploration (1527–1598). Ruler of the Patron of Pierre Du Gua de Monts settlement in Florida in and development of New Mary, Spanish Empire in North Henry Stuart 1562 and 1565. World territories. Appointed François II (1544–1560). Queen of Scots and South America. and Samuel de Champlain’s voyages (1545–1567). to North America. Authorized the founding Troillus des Mesgoüets as Married Mary, Queen of Scots (1558). (1542–1587). of Québec in 1608. Viceroy of Canada in 1578. Granted Jacques Noël, Jacques Cartier’s nephew, privileged rights to fishing, fur trading, and mining in New France. JAMES I (1566–1625). King of Scotland, and of England and Ireland in 1603. Began English colonization of North America and founded Cuper’s Cove, Newfoundland, in 1610. Laid foundations of the British Empire from which Canada derived common law and constitutional structure. Ana Ana María Mauricia LOUIS XIII, “The Just” (1601–1643). de Austria y Austria (1601–1666). CHARLES I, “The Martyr” Henrietta Maria of France (1609–1669). Organised the development and Queen consort of France and Navarre, (1600–1649). Patron of George Queen consort of England, Scotland, st Elizabeth Stuart, administration of New France, expanding regent for her son, Louis XIV of France, Calvert, 1 Baron Baltimore, Henry Frederick Stuart, Prince of Wales and Ireland as the wife of King Charles I. Namesake th “The Winter Queen,” its settlements westward along the Saint 1643–1651. She chose to empower 8 Proprietary Governor of (1594–1612). Patron of Sir Thomas Button’s of the British colony of Maryland, established (1596-1662). Lawrence River from Québec City to a new company, the Community Newfoundland who established Hudson Bay expedition of 1612–1613. in 1632, and of Cape Henrietta Maria, located Married Frederick V. Montréal. of Habitants of New France, with a the first sustained English in Hudson’s Bay, Ontario. monopoly on the fur trade and the settlement in Avalon, Newfoundland. privilege of granting land claims. Mary, LOUIS XIV, “The Sun King” CHARLES II, “The Merrie Monarch” JAMES II (1633–1701). Namesake Sophia of the Rupert, Count of the Rhine, Duke Princess Royal (1638–1715). Created New France (1630–1685). Granted a trade of the Albany River in Northern Palatinate, Electress of Cumberland (1619–1682). (1631–1660). as a royal province in 1663 and Philippe I, monopoly over “Rupert’s Land” Ontario. Became Governor of the Princess Henrietta of Hanover, Namesake of Rupert’s Land, the largest Was the first reformed the colonial government. Duc d’Orléans to the Hudson’s Bay Company by Hudson’s Bay Company in 1683. of England Heiress Presumptive territory in British North America, daughter of a British Dispatched the filles du roi to New (1640–1701). royal charter in 1670 and named (1644–1670). (1630–1714). which encompassed Manitoba, parts of sovereign to hold France; appointed Jean Talon as the the territory Rupert’s Land, after Daughter of Elizabeth Saskatchewan, Alberta, Nunavut, Ontario, the title “Princess colony’s first active intendant and his cousin Prince Rupert of the “The Winter Queen”. Quebec, and parts of the United States. Royal.” Frontenac as Governor of New France. Rhine, the company’s first Governor. Founder and first Governor of the Hudson’s Bay Company (1670–1682). Philippe II, Duc d’Orléans ANNE (1665–1714). Namesake MARY II (1662–1694). William III (1694–1702). (1674–1723). Charles Lennox, of various Canadian geographic Married William III (1677). Joint ruler with his wife, Mary II, Duke of Richmond GEORGE I (1660–1727). Acted as Regent for features, including Annapolis James Stuart, and alone after her death. He and Duke of Lennox Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Louis de France, Louis XV, 1715–1723. Royal in Nova Scotia. Held “The Old Pretender” appointed commissioners to (1672–1723). was named after his family line. “Le Grand Dauphin” Commissioned audience with the Four Mohawk (1688-1766) promote trade in the American (1661–1711). Pierre François Illegitimate son Kings of the Six Nations in 1710. plantations and elsewhere. Xavier de Charlevoix of Charles II. Queen Anne’s War (1702–1713) to survey the historic ended with the French cession boundaries of of Hudson’s Bay, Acadia, Acadia, newly lost and Newfoundland to Britain. to the British. Charlevoix travelled across North America Charles Lennox, GEORGE II (1683–1760). between 1720 and nd Ordered the construction of Louis de France, 2 Duke of 1722, and kept a Halifax in 1749 and was the “Le Petit Dauphin” Richmond and record of the entire nd Royal Founder of St. Paul’s Church (1682–1712). 2 Duke of Lennox voyage. In 1744 (1701–1750). in downtown Halifax. he published “History Charles Stuart, Henry Stuart, of New France.” “The Young Pretender” Cardinal “Bonnie Duke of York Prince Charlie” (1725–1807). LOUIS XV, “The Well-Beloved” (1710– (1720–1788). 1774). During his reign, Louisbourg was Charles Lennox, founded (1720) and Pierre Gaultier de 3rd Duke of General Lord Varennes, sieur de La Vérendrye helped Richmond and 3rd George Lennox Frederick Louis, Prince of Wales (1707–1751). to expand New France’s fur trade by Duke of Lennox (1737–1805). Fort Frederick Kingston, Ontario and of establishing various posts west of Quebec. (1735–1806). Fought in the Seven Fort Frederick in Fredericton, New Brunswick, Under the Treaty of Paris, France ceded Namesake of Years’ War. were named after him. sovereignty over Canada to Britain Lennox, Ontario. at the end of the Seven Years War. Louis, Dauphin de th GEORGE III (1738–1820). The first sovereign France (1729–1765). Charles Lennox, 4 Duke of Richmond and 4th Duke of Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz (1744 –1818). to reign over all of Canada due to the Royal Son of Louis XV; Queen Consort Namesake of the Queen Charlotte Proclamation of 1763; significantly impacted Crown Dauphin from Lennox (1764–1819). In 1818 he was appointed Governor Islands in British Columbia (present Haida Gwaii). and Aboriginal peoples’ relationship for centuries. 1729 to 1765. General Namesake of Charlottetown, Prince Edward Granted a royal charter to Saint John, New Brunswick Namesake of of British North America. Island (1865), the “Birthplace of Confederation” in 1785; New Brunswick was named after his family Dauphin, Manitoba, and site of the 1864 Charlottetown Conference. line (1784). established in 1741. Frederick, Duke Prince Edward, GEORGE IV (1762–1830). Granted WILLIAM IV (1765–1837). First member of the Royal Duke of Kent and Lady Mary Lennox (1792–1847). Lady Sarah Lennox of York and Albany Prince Adolphus, Charles Lennox, 5th Duke Lord William Pitt Lennox a royal charter in 1827 for the Family to visit Canada. Travelled extensively through Strathearn (1767– Ernest, Duke of Married Sir Charles Augutus Fitzroy, (1792–1873). (1763–1827). Duke of Cambridge of Richmond and 5th Duke (1799–1881). Served as establishment of a university in Quebec, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland as a captain 1820). Commander- Cumberland and Prince Augustus who travelled to Lower Canada Married Sir Peregrine Maitland, Namesake of (1774–1850). of Lennox (1791–1860). aide-de-camp to the 4th Upper Canada, King’s College in the Royal Navy 1786–1787. His 1832 Great Reform in-Chief of British Teviotdale Frederick, with the 4th Duke of Richmond who served as Lieutenant- Fredericton, Namesake of Responsible for establishing Duke of Richmond, Governor (present University of Toronto). Act significantly impacted Canada’s electoral system. forces in North (1771– 1851). Duke of Sussex in 1818. Fitzroy was appointed Governor of Upper Canada New Brunswick Adolphustown, the Military General Service General of British North In 1814 the then Prince Regent America in 1799. Namesake of what (1773– 1843). as the 11th Governor of 1818–1828 and of Nova Scotia (1785). The Duke of located in Greater Medal in 1847. America 1818–1819. signed and ratified the Treaty of He was the first was Cumberland, Prince Edward Island in 1837. 1828–1834. York Bay was named Napanee, Ontario. Ghent, ending the War of 1812.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix a PCC Protocol Death Senior National Figure.Pdf

    Appendix a PCC Protocol Death Senior National Figure.Pdf

    Appendix A: PCC Protocol Death of Senior National Figure PORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL PROTOCOL FOR MARKING THE DEATH OF A SENIOR NATIONAL FIGURE OR LOCAL HOLDER OF HIGH OFFICE This protocol sets out the action to be taken in the event of the death of: H.M. The Queen H.R.H. The Duke of Edinburgh H.R.H. The Prince of Wales H.R.H. The Duchess of Cornwall H.R.H. The Duke of Cambridge H.R.H. The Duchess of Cambridge H.R.H. Prince George of Cambridge H.R.H. Princess Charlotte of Cambridge H.R.H. Prince Henry (Harry) of Wales H.R.H. The Duke of York H.R.H. The Earl of Wessex H.R.H. The Princess Royal H.R.H. The Countess of Wessex o The Prime Minister o The Members of Parliament for the constituencies of which the City of Portsmouth forms a part o A serving Mayor or Leader of the Council o A serving member of the Council Contact details for all those with responsibilities under this protocol are set out in Annexe 5 This protocol was agreed by the Chief Executive on 8th July 2016 This protocol was ratified the Leader of the Council on 8th July 2016 It is due for review not later than September 2017 1 Appendix A: PCC Protocol Death of Senior National Figure PART 1 Implementation of the Protocol on hearing of the death Action required Authorised by Other Notes Portsmouth City Council’s Implementation will be The implementing officer mourning Protocol will be authorised by the Chief will arrange for flags to be implemented on the formal Executive or Assistant lowered immediately and announcement of the Chief Executive for books of condolence to be death of any one of those implementation by Claire opened on the next persons named on page 1 Looney, Partnership & working day.
  • Guidance on the Use of Royal Arms, Names and Images

    Guidance on the Use of Royal Arms, Names and Images

    GUIDANCE ON THE USE OF ROYAL ARMS, NAMES AND IMAGES 1 The following booklet summarises the legal position governing the use, for commercial purposes, of the Royal Arms, Royal Devices, Emblems and Titles and of photographs, portraits, engravings, effigies and busts of The Queen and Members of the Royal Family. Guidance on advertising in which reference is made to a Member of the Royal Family, and on the use of images of Members of the Royal Family on articles for sale, is also provided. The Lord Chamberlain’s Office will be pleased to provide guidance when it is unclear as to whether the use of “Arms” etc., may give the impression that there is a Royal connection. 2 TRADE MARKS Section 4 (1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 states: “A trade mark which consists of or contains – (a) the Royal arms, or any of the principal armorial bearings of the Royal arms, or any insignia or device so nearly resembling the Royal arms or any such armorial bearing as to be likely to be mistaken for them or it, (b) a representation of the Royal crown or any of the Royal flags, (c) a representation of Her Majesty or any Member of the Royal Family, or any colourable imitation thereof, or (d) words, letters or devices likely to lead persons to think that the applicant either has or recently has had Royal patronage or authorisation, shall not be registered unless it appears to the registrar that consent has been given by or on behalf of Her Majesty or, as the case may be, the relevant Member of the Royal Family.” The Lord Chamberlain's Office is empowered to grant the consent referred to in Section 4(1) on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen.
  • Roman-Barbarian Marriages in the Late Empire R.C

    Roman-Barbarian Marriages in the Late Empire R.C

    ROMAN-BARBARIAN MARRIAGES IN THE LATE EMPIRE R.C. Blockley In 1964 Rosario Soraci published a study of conubia between Romans and Germans from the fourth to the sixth century A.D.1 Although the title of the work might suggest that its concern was to be with such marriages through- out the period, in fact its aim was much more restricted. Beginning with a law issued by Valentinian I in 370 or 373 to the magister equitum Theodosius (C.Th. 3.14.1), which banned on pain of death all marriages between Roman pro- vincials and barbarae or gentiles, Soraci, after assessing the context and intent of the law, proceeded to discuss its influence upon the practices of the Germanic kingdoms which succeeded the Roman Empire in the West. The text of the law reads: Nulli provineialium, cuiuscumque ordinis aut loci fuerit, cum bar- bara sit uxore coniugium, nec ulli gentilium provinciales femina copuletur. Quod si quae inter provinciales atque gentiles adfinitates ex huiusmodi nuptiis extiterit, quod in his suspectum vel noxium detegitur, capitaliter expietur. This was regarded by Soraci not as a general banning law but rather as a lim- ited attempt, in the context of current hostilities with the Alamanni, to keep those barbarians serving the Empire (gentiles)isolated from the general Roman 2 populace. The German lawmakers, however, exemplified by Alaric in his 63 64 interpretatio,3 took it as a general banning law and applied it in this spir- it, so that it became the basis for the prohibition under the Germanic king- doms of intermarriage between Romans and Germans.
  • To Download Magna Carta FAQ Answers .PDF

    To Download Magna Carta FAQ Answers .PDF

    Magna Carta FAQ: Answers Produced with the support of the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEX) Answers provided by: Professor Nigel Saul Magna Carta FAQ: Answers Q1) WHAT’S MAGNA CARTA DONE FOR ME? Quite simple - it’s because of Magna Carta that we well whatever he liked – and did. After the making of the live in a free country today. Magna Carta affirmed the Charter he was subject to the law like everyone else. In vital principle of freedom under the law. Clause 39 of the mid thirteenth century the lawyer Henry Bracton was the Charter said: ‘no free man shall be imprisoned or to write, ‘in England the king is below God and below the deprived of his lands except by judgement of his peers or law’. by the law of the land’. Clause 40 said: ‘To no one shall we sell, delay or deny right or justice’. Before the making of Magna Carta the king had been able to do pretty Q2) HOW MUCH OF MAGNA CARTA IS STILL ON THE STATUTE BOOK? Very little, in fact. To be precise, just four clauses of the matters? Most definitely not. All great documents are the original 1215 version of the Charter. These are: clause product of specific historical circumstances and lose their 1, guaranteeing the liberties of the Church; clause 13, immediate relevance over time. But that does not mean guaranteeing the liberties of the City of London; and that they can be forgotten or consigned to the historical the famous clauses 39 and 40, guaranteeing due legal waste paper bin.
  • Introduction, the Constitution of the State of Connecticut

    Introduction, the Constitution of the State of Connecticut

    Sacred Heart University DigitalCommons@SHU Government, Politics & Global Studies Faculty Government, Politics & Global Studies Publications 2011 Introduction, The onsC titution of the State of Connecticut Gary L. Rose Sacred Heart University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/gov_fac Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Rose, Gary L., "Introduction, The onC stitution of the State of Connecticut" (2011). Government, Politics & Global Studies Faculty Publications. Paper 2. http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/gov_fac/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Government, Politics & Global Studies at DigitalCommons@SHU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Government, Politics & Global Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SHU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Connecticut license plates boldly bear the inscription, “the Constitution State.” This is due to Connecticut’s long and proud tradition of self-government under the protection of a written constitution. Connecticut’s constitutional tradition can be traced to the Fundamental Orders of 1639. Drafted by repre- sentatives from the three Connecticut River towns of Hartford, Wethersfi eld and Windsor, the Fundamental Orders were the very fi rst constitution known to humankind. The Orders were drafted completely free of British infl uence and established what can be considered as the fi rst self-governing colony in North America. Moreover, Connecticut’s Fundamental Orders can be viewed as the foundation for constitutional government in the western world. In 1662, the Fundamental Orders were replaced by a Royal Charter. Granted to Connecticut by King Charles II, the Royal Charter not only embraced the principles of the Fundamental Orders, but also formally recognized Connecticut’s system of self-government.
  • The American Actress, the English Duchess, and the Privacy Litigation by Amber Melville-Brown

    The American Actress, the English Duchess, and the Privacy Litigation by Amber Melville-Brown

    The American Actress, the English Duchess, and the Privacy Litigation By Amber Melville-Brown First Brexit, Now Megzit... trip back to the motherland In a move more resonant with players of the TV were dashed with the event show “Survival” than with members of the British royal postponed amid the CO- family, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex—Prince Harry VID-19 coronavirus pan- and Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex—blindsided demic, even ironically as his senior royals with a unilateral announcement that they father HRH Prince Charles intended to “carve out a progressive new role”1 within the himself actually succumbed royal family, and by the surprise launch of their own and tested positive for the independent website. The relatively sparsely populated virus. www.sussexroyal.com—including a personal statement The couple’s new social about their recently launched media litigation, reference media sites also suffered a to the Royal Rota media system that they are rejecting, blow; the new relationship and to the Information Commissioner’s Office public carved out in negotiations interest test under the Freedom of Information Act—sug- between the royal fam- gests strongly that it is the couple’s tense relationship ily and the couple as they venture out on their own saw with the media that has led them to seek a new “working them having to abandon use of the “Sussex Royal” brand model” in 2020. with which they heralded the new them, before the ink on Indeed, if this announcement was intended to foster the new branding was really even dry.
  • A Historical and Legal Study of Sovereignty in the Canadian North : Terrestrial Sovereignty, 1870–1939

    A Historical and Legal Study of Sovereignty in the Canadian North : Terrestrial Sovereignty, 1870–1939

    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
  • Miss Lisa Brown's Guide to Dressing for a Regency Ball – Gentlemen's

    Miss Lisa Brown's Guide to Dressing for a Regency Ball – Gentlemen's

    MMiissss LLiissaa BBrroowwnn’’ss GGuuiiddee ttoo DDrreessssiinngg ffoorr aa RReeggeennccyy BBaallll –– GGeennttlleemmeenn’’ss EEddiittiioonn (and remove string!) Shave Jane Austen & the Regency face every Wednesday and The term “Regency” refers to years between 1811 Sunday as per regulations. and 1820 when George III of the United Kingdom was deemed unfit to rule and his son, later George Other types of facial hair IV, was installed as his proxy with the title of were not popular and were “Prince Regent”. However, “Regency Era” is often not allowed in the military. applied to the years between 1795 and 1830. This No beards, mustaches, period is often called the “Extended Regency” goatees, soul patches or because the time shared the same distinctive culture, Van Dykes. fashion, architecture, politics and the continuing Napoleonic War. If you have short hair, brush it forward into a Caesar cut style The author most closely associated with the with no discernable part. If your Regency is Jane Austen (1775-1817). Her witty and hair is long, put it into a pony tail engaging novels are a window into the manners, at the neck with a bow. lifestyle and society of the English gentry. She is the ideal connexion to English Country Dancing as Curly hair for both men and each of her six books: Pride and Prejudice , Sense women was favored over straight and Sensibility , Emma , Persuasion , Mansfield Par k hair. Individual curls were made and Northanger Abbey, feature balls and dances. with pomade (hair gel) and curling papers. Hair If you are unable to assemble much of a Regency wardrobe, you can still look the part by growing your sideburns The Minimum and getting a Caesar cut If you wish to dress the part of a country gentleman hairstyle.
  • Anecdotes of Celebrities of London and Paris [Electronic Resource]: To

    Anecdotes of Celebrities of London and Paris [Electronic Resource]: To

    TWO SHILLINGS Captain cSro.noto's Celebrities /m <^I \\BB& ba<*YB S^SSS &eon«ianj»niEk. of UorvtujTi'anti Mam «N. SMITH,. ELBER, i G0. ANECDOTES OF CELEBRITIES OF LONDON AND PARIS, TO WHICH ARE ADDED THE LAST RECOLLECTIONS OF CAPTAIN GRONOW, FORMERLY OF THE FIRST FOOT GUARDS. A NEW EDITION. LONDON: SMITH, ELDER & CO., 15, WATERLOO PLACE. 1870. CONTENTS. PAGE Almack'a in 1815, .... 1 The Duke of Wellington and the Cavalry, 2 The Duke at Carlton House, 4 The Duke and the Author, 4 Wellington's First Campaign, . 8 The Guards and the Umbrellas, 1(J Colonel Freemantle and the Duke's Quarters, 11 A Word for Brown Bess, 12 A Strange Rencontre, .... 13 English and French Soldiers on the Boulevards, 15 " Date obolum Belisario," 16 "Hats off," 16 Hatred of the Prussians by the French Peasantry, 18 Severe Discipline in the Russian Army, 19 The Emperor Alexander in Paris, 2(1 A Fire-Eater Cowed, .... 21 An Insult Rightly Redressed, . 22 A Duel between Two Old Friends, 23 A Duel between Two Officers in the Life Guards, 23 Fayot, the Champion of the Legitimists, 24 The Gardes du Corps, .... 24 The late Marshal Castellane, 28 The late General Gabriel, 31 Admiral de la Susse, .... VI Contents. I'AOK Marshal Lobau, . 34 Montrond, 35 Chateaubriand, . 36 Parson Ambrose, 36 Captain Wilding, 37 The Church Militant, . 38 Louis XVIII., . 38 The Bridge of Jena Saved, 39 Louis XVIII. and Sosth&nes de la Rochefoucauld, 40 The Due de Grammont, 40 The Montmorencies, 42 Ouvrard the Financier, 45 Madame de Stael, 48 A Feminine Foible, 52 Mademoiselle le Xormand, 52 An Ominous Fall, 55 Louis Philippe and Marshal Soult, 55 Decamps and the Duke of Orleans, 56 Fashion in Paris, 57 Literary Salons in France, 64 Sir John Elley, .
  • Captain Andrew Aspden the Private Secretary to the Earl of Wessex, Bagshot Park, Bagshot, Surrey, GU19 5PL

    Captain Andrew Aspden the Private Secretary to the Earl of Wessex, Bagshot Park, Bagshot, Surrey, GU19 5PL

    Captain Andrew Aspden The Private Secretary to the Earl of Wessex, Bagshot Park, Bagshot, Surrey, GU19 5PL 14th April 2021 Dear Earl of Wessex, I was deeply saddened to learn of the death of His Royal Highness The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, and I join with the nation in mourning his loss. I write to express my deepest sympathy to you and The Countess of Wessex. On behalf of the Rayner farming family of Royal Berkshire, the whole family gives thanks for His Royal Highness’ dedicated service to the nation, and commitment to making a difference via so many charitable causes. His Royal Highness’ constant support to her Majesty throughout seven decades of marriage has been a true inspiration. I was extremely privileged that His Royal Highness was able to attend my Mayor’s ball in May 2013 at Guards Polo Club. His Royal Highness made it an incredibly special evening, as he took time to speak to the three school choirs, including the choir from St Mary’s School Ascot, and all our guests. With His Royal Highness The Prince Philip’s help, we raised a lot of money for The Prince Philip Trust Fund that night. His Royal Highness offered great support and wise words while my team was building the Carriage Driving Courses in the grounds of Windsor Castle. We will miss seeing His Royal Highness driving in his carriages and Land Rover around Home Park Private while we are preparing for the Royal Windsor Horse Show. I have many fond memories and encounters to remember His Royal Highness Prince Philip by.
  • THE PRINCE of WALES and the DUCHESS of CORNWALL Background Information for Media

    THE PRINCE of WALES and the DUCHESS of CORNWALL Background Information for Media

    THE PRINCE OF WALES AND THE DUCHESS OF CORNWALL Background Information for Media May 2019 Contents Biography .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Seventy Facts for Seventy Years ...................................................................................................... 4 Charities and Patronages ................................................................................................................. 7 Military Affiliations .......................................................................................................................... 8 The Duchess of Cornwall ............................................................................................................ 10 Biography ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Charities and Patronages ............................................................................................................... 10 Military Affiliations ........................................................................................................................ 13 A speech by HRH The Prince of Wales at the "Our Planet" premiere, Natural History Museum, London ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Address by HRH The Prince of Wales at a service to celebrate the contribution
  • Referral for Kidney Transplantation in Canadian Provinces

    Referral for Kidney Transplantation in Canadian Provinces

    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY www.jasn.org Referral for Kidney Transplantation in Canadian Provinces S. Joseph Kim,1,a John S. Gill,2,3,a Greg Knoll,4,5 Patricia Campbell,6 Marcelo Cantarovich,7 Edward Cole ,1 and Bryce Kiberd8 1University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; 2University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; 3Division of Nephrology, Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, Canada; 4University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; 5Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; 6University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; 7McGill University, Montreal, Canada; and 8Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada ABSTRACT Background Patient referral to a transplant facility, a prerequisite for dialysis-treated patients to access kidney transplantation in Canada, is a subjective process that is not recorded in national dialysis or trans- plant registries. Patients who may benefit from transplant may not be referred. Methods In this observational study, we prospectively identified referrals for kidney transplant in adult patients between June 2010 and May 2013 in 12 transplant centers, and linked these data to information on incident dialysis patients in a national registry. Results Among 13,184 patients initiating chronic dialysis, the cumulative incidence of referral for trans- plant was 17.3%, 24.0%, and 26.8% at 1, 2, and 3 years after dialysis initiation, respectively; the rate of transplant referral was 15.8 per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval, 15.1 to 16.4). Transplant re- ferral varied more than three-fold between provinces, but it was not associated with the rate of deceased organ donation or median waiting time for transplant in individual provinces.