DOCSLIB.ORG

Three Essays in Venture Capital

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Three Essays in Venture Capital Three Essays in Venture Capital A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities June 2015 Fan Wang Manchester Business School CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 6 Declaration ........................................................................................................................ 7 Copyright Statement ......................................................................................................... 8 Dedication ......................................................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation ................................................................................................................ 11 1.2 Thesis structure ......................................................................................................... 18 References ....................................................................................................................... 19 Chapter 2 Syndicated Venture Capital Investments: What's in it for Local Venture Capitalists? Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Literature and hypothesis development .................................................................... 25 2.2.1 Theoretical framework ....................................................................................... 25 2.2.2 Syndicate experience .......................................................................................... 30 2.2.3 Syndicate experience and investment selection .................................................. 31 2.2.4 Syndicate experience and investment performance ............................................ 33 2.3. Data and methodology ............................................................................................. 34 2.3.1 Data and sample ................................................................................................. 34 2 2.3.2 Dependent variables ........................................................................................... 37 2.3.3 Explanatory variables ........................................................................................ 38 2.3.4 Control variables ................................................................................................ 39 2.3.5 Estimation models .............................................................................................. 40 2.4 Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 44 2.4.1 Local VC firms’ foreign syndicate experience ................................................... 44 2.4.3 Univariate analysis of selection and performance ............................................. 45 2.4.2 Local VC firms with foreign syndicate experience ............................................. 47 2.4.4 Investment selection ........................................................................................... 49 2.4.5 Investment performance ..................................................................................... 50 2.4.6 Robustness check ................................................................................................ 51 2.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 53 References ....................................................................................................................... 55 Appendix ......................................................................................................................... 73 Chapter 3 Do Venture Capital Firms Benefit as Boards of Directors in Mature Public Companies? Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 74 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 75 3.2 Literature review and hypothesis development ........................................................ 77 3.2.1 VC characteristics and directorships ................................................................. 77 3.2.2 Directorships and VC fundraising ..................................................................... 79 3.2.3 Directorships and investment performance ....................................................... 81 3.3 Data and methodology .............................................................................................. 82 3.3.1 Data and sample ................................................................................................. 82 3 3.3.2 Dependent variables ........................................................................................... 85 3.3.3 Determinants of VC directorship ....................................................................... 86 3.3.4 Estimation models .............................................................................................. 88 3.4 Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 93 3.4.1. Directorship and VC firm characteristics ......................................................... 93 3.4.1.1 Univariate analysis ................................................................................................. 93 3.4.1.2 Multivariate analysis............................................................................................... 94 3.4.2 Directorship and fundraising ............................................................................. 96 3.4.2.1 Univariate analysis ................................................................................................. 98 3.4.2.2 Multivariate analysis............................................................................................... 99 3.4.3 Directorship and investment performance ....................................................... 101 3.4.3.1 Univariate analysis ............................................................................................... 101 3.4.3.2 Multivariate analysis............................................................................................. 102 3.5 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 104 References ..................................................................................................................... 107 Appendix ....................................................................................................................... 120 Chapter 4 Dead Investors: What do we Know about the Failure of Venture Capital Firms? Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 122 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 123 4.2 Literature and hypothesis development .................................................................. 125 4.2.1 VC activities and failure of VC firms ............................................................... 126 4.2.1.1 Fundraising ........................................................................................................... 126 4.2.1.2 Investment ............................................................................................................. 128 4 4.2.1.3 Exits ....................................................................................................................... 129 4.2.2 VC characteristics and failure of VC firms ...................................................... 131 4.2.2.1 VC firm location .................................................................................................... 132 4.2.2.2 VC firm year of incorporation .............................................................................. 133 4.3 Data and methodology ............................................................................................ 134 4.3.1 Data and sample ............................................................................................... 134 4.3.2 Identifying failed VC firms ............................................................................... 135 4.3.3 Dependent variables ......................................................................................... 136 4.3.4 Explanatory variables ...................................................................................... 137 4.3.5 Estimation model .............................................................................................. 139 4.4 Analysis and results ................................................................................................ 141 4.4.1 Summary statistics ............................................................................................ 141 4.4.2 Univariate analysis ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Private Equity Overview
    Private Equity Overview Faegre Drinker’s national private equity practice FOCUSED on the has the experience to deliver success in large, middle market sophisticated transactions, as well as the agility and rate structure to equally excel in smaller transactions. Our private equity team is a core part of our 175-lawyer M&A practice, which over the past three years has OVER 175 dedicated closed over 725 deals with an aggregate value of over $100 billion. M&A professionals We know the private equity deal market, and we understand and apply the latest structures, strategies and practices for private equity deals, with extensive OVER 725 M&A deals experience on both the buy-side and the sell-side. We deliver value in advising funds, management, over the past three years co-investors and portfolio companies throughout the private equity life cycle. From acquisitions, to minority and control investments, day-to-day counseling, add- on acquisitions, recapitalizations and restructurings, OVER $100 BILLION and ultimately to the array of exit events, we provide aggregate deal value practical guidance and solutions throughout the full over the past three years range of opportunities and issues. We team with our national-level fund formation and governance professionals to offer additional levels of insight and experience, and we capitalize on the knowledge of our over 1,300 attorneys, consultants and professionals to deliver top-level value and results. Our team represents clients and leads transactions across a wide range of industries, including Sources say the group is manufacturing, consumer and retail, insurance, food and beverages, sports and entertainment, industrials, ‘excellent technically and, from a transportation and logistics, communications and media, health care, life sciences, education, financial customer service perspective, goes services, and technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing the Role of the Finance Executive
    Advancing the role of the finance executive Built on the back of in-depth conversations with private equity CFOs, a 20-year heritage of our CFO community and the annual conference Contents » Connect. Evolve. Advance. » Past attendees list » Testimonials » Product offering » Messaging platform functionality » Unlock your networking opportunities with our virtual platform » Events 2 of 13 Advance your career Get direct access to industry peers and specialists who are tackling the same problems and obstacles you face. Benchmark your strategies and solutions to progress Connect. with confidence. Evolve. Advance your team Successful CFOs have a strong support team. Give Advance. your COO, CIO CCO, Finance Director and Controller The industry defining CFO & COO Forum All Access. Dive into a wide range of operational hot is now just one of the many essential topics from tax and compliance to recruitment, data updates we’ll give you throughout the year security management and cyber risk. with your CFO All Access subscription, designed around you to unlock: » Insider know-how – from CFO leaders at the top firms, to the innovators in the mid and lower market Advance your firm » Sector specific xpertisee – from technology to human capital to ESG The world is changing faster than ever – driven by macro issues such as climate change, a pandemic » Regulatory insight – direct from SEC global recession and political uncertainty. Progressive executives and directors strategies on ESG and diversity are no longer nice to » Authoritative market commentary – haves. LPs are directing capital to firms that take these from our acclaimed editorial team topics seriously and can show it.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report Q2 2009
    PEARL HOLDING LIMITED QUARTERLY REPORT Q2 2009 Quarterly report for the period from 1 April 2009 to 30 June 2009 2 PEARL HOLDING LIMITED QUARTERLY REPORT Q2 2009 PEARL HOLDING LIMITED The convertible bond issued by Pearl Holding Limited provides access to the private equity asset class. For the fi rst time, investors have the opportunity to buy into the earnings poten- tial of a broadly diversifi ed private equity portfolio, while enjoying capital protection and a 2% coupon. Its tailor-made structure makes the convertible bond suitable for German pri- vate and institutional investors (i.e. “sicherungsvermögens- und spezialfondsfähig”). This document is not intended to be an investment ad- vertisement or sales instrument; it constitutes neither an offer nor an attempt to solicit offers for the product described herein. This report was prepared using fi nan- cial information contained in the company’s books and records as of the reporting date. This information is be- lieved to be accurate but has not been audited by any third party. This report describes past performance, which may not be indicative of future results. The com- pany does not accept any liability for actions taken on the basis of the information provided. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Investment manager´s report 4 2 Private equity market environment 8 3 Portfolio allocation 10 4 Portfolio 12 5 Portfolio overview 14 6 Financial figures 17 4 PEARL HOLDING LIMITED QUARTERLY REPORT Q2 2009 1 INVESTMENT MANAGER´S REPORT NAV in the context of the economic were offset to a certain extent by IFRS va- downturn luation methods used by the investment manager to refl ect the “fair value” of Pearl’s Against the backdrop of a persistently dif- portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • Anticipated Acquisition by Capital Radio Plc of GWR Group Plc
    Anticipated acquisition by Capital Radio Plc of GWR Group Plc The OFT's decision on reference under section 33(1) given on 22 December 2004 PARTIES 1. Capital Radio Plc (Capital) is a commercial radio group, providing 21 local analogue stations and 58 digital programme stations, including the Capital FM Network, Capital Gold, Century FM, Xfm and Choice FM. Capital owns outright four local digital multiplexes1, has a 50 per cent holding in three more and minority interests in a further seven. For the financial year to September 2004, Capital’s turnover was £119.9m. 2. GWR Group Plc (GWR) is a commercial radio group that owns Classic FM and 30 local analogue licences (providing 36 local stations) and 35 digital programme stations. It owns a controlling interest in the national commercial digital multiplex operator, controls 14 local digital multiplexes and has a minority investment in one London multiplex. GWR also has a minority shareholding in Classic Gold Digital Limited (CGDL), which owns 18 AM licences and digital services. For the financial year to March 2004, GWR’s turnover was £128.7m. 3. Both GWR and Capital Radio have shareholdings in Independent Radio News Limited (IRN) (Capital 45.64 per cent and GWR 8.97 per cent) and in Hit40UK Limited (Hit40UK) (Capital 38.1 per cent, GWR 34.2 per cent). These organisations, respectively, provide a national news service (Newslink) and a music chart show to radio stations of different groups across the UK in return for advertising space, which is currently sold by Capital (as an agent for IRN and Hit40UK).
    [Show full text]
  • Partners Group Private Equity
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM NPORT-P Filing Date: 2020-08-26 | Period of Report: 2020-06-30 SEC Accession No. 0001752724-20-174334 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Partners Group Private Equity (Master Fund), LLC Mailing Address Business Address 1114 AVENUE OF THE 1114 AVENUE OF THE CIK:1447247| IRS No.: 800270189 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 0331 AMERICAS AMERICAS Type: NPORT-P | Act: 40 | File No.: 811-22241 | Film No.: 201137479 37TH FLOOR 37TH FLOOR NEW YORK NY 10036 NEW YORK NY 10036 212-908-2600 Copyright © 2020 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document ITEM 1. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS. The Schedule(s) of Investments is attached herewith. Partners Group Private Equity (Master Fund), LLC (a Delaware Limited Liability Company) Consolidated Schedule of Investments — June 30, 2020 (Unaudited) The unaudited consolidated schedule of investments of Partners Group Private Equity (Master Fund), LLC (the “Fund”), a Delaware limited liability company that is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), as a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company, as of June 30, 2020 is set forth below: INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL NET ASSETS Copyright © 2020 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Partners Group Private Equity (Master Fund), LLC (a Delaware Limited Liability Company) Consolidated Schedule of Investments — June 30, 2020 (Unaudited) Acquisition Fair Industry Shares Date Value Common Stocks (2.38%) Asia - Pacific (0.06%) Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. Technology 06/19/20 4,439 $ 957,581 APA Group Utilities 02/11/16 360,819 2,765,432 Total Asia - Pacific (0.06%) 3,723,013 North America (1.09%) American Tower Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity Summary Report–July 2017
    Health Care Market Intelligence 2017 Private Equity Summary Report–July 2017 Table of Contents 1. A Mid-Year Review: 2017 Healthcare M&A 1. A Mid-Year Review: and Private Equity Landscape 2017 Healthcare M&A and PE Landscape A Look Back at the First Half of 2017 … 2. By the Numbers: Mid-Year At the midpoint of 2017, deal data suggests deal volume (both PE and M&A) 2017 M&A and PE Data continues to trend downward – a trend that started in 2016 – however, despite - Healthcare TEV/EBIDTA this, deal values are experiencing a surge. - M&A: Healthcare Services Activity Healthcare According to PwC, despite uncertainty on the healthcare reform - M&A: Healthcare M&A front, U.S. deal volume remained stable in the first half of 2017. Technology Activity HealthcareMandA.com, a unit of Irving Levin, found: - Digital Health Funding • M&A tapered off a bit in Q2 2017 compared to Q1 2017; deal volume fell 2011 – H1 2017 15% to 366 transactions (430 in Q1 2017). - Healthcare PE Deal Activity Volume Value • Deal volume was also down 14% from the same quarter in 2016. - Healthcare PE Exit Trends • That said, deal value reached $95.8 billion, an increase of 62% compared 3. 2017 H1 Activity: to Q1 2017 ($59.1 billion). Notable Developments Q2’s surge in deal value was in part attributed to investors’ acceptance 4. Looking Ahead: that healthcare reform would be a longer process than initially Remainder of 2017 anticipated. Healthcare PitchBook data suggests a significant increase in the value of PE PE investments in the first half of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast Bulletin Issue Number
    O fcom Broadcast Bulletin Issue number 126 26 January 2009 1 Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin, Issue 126 26 January 2009 Contents Introduction 3 Notice of Sanction ITV Broadcasting Limited Breach of Channel 3 licence conditions in respect of ‘Out of London’ production in 2006 and 2007 4 Channel Television Ltd STV Central Ltd and STV North Ltd UTV Ltd Breach of Channel 3 licence conditions in respect of ‘Out of London’ production in 2006 and 2007 5 Standards cases In Breach Beat: Life on the Street ITV1, Series 1: 29 October - 3 December 2006, 18:00 and Series 2: 27 January - 2 March 2008, 18:00 6 Now That’s What I Call Music Chart Chart Show TV, 18 November 2008, 16:00 12 Pizza Man by Cisco Kid Clubland TV, 4 November 2008, 19:30 13 Not In Breach Steve Sutherland Galaxy Birmingham, 29 November 2008, 21:55 14 Fairness & Privacy cases There are no Fairness and Privacy cases in this issue of the bulletin Other programmes not in breach/resolved 16 2 Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin, Issue 126 26 January 2009 Introduction The Broadcast Bulletin reports on the outcome of investigations into alleged breaches of those Ofcom codes which broadcasting licensees are required to comply. These include: a) Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code (“the Code”) which took effect on 25 July 2005 (with the exception of Rule 10.17 which came into effect on 1 July 2005). This Code is used to assess the compliance of all programmes broadcast on or after 25 July 2005. The Broadcasting Code can be found at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/codes/bcode/ b) the Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising (“COSTA”) which came into effect on 1 September 2008 and contains rules on how much advertising and teleshopping may be scheduled in programmes, how many breaks are allowed and when they may be taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Birmingham Should Not Be Allowed to Make the Changes to The
    Spence, Mr Consultation question: Should regional radio station Capital FM (Birmingham) be permitted to make the changes to its Character of Service as proposed with particular regard to the statutory criteria as set out in the summary? (The Broadcasting Act 1990 Section 106 (1A) (b) and (d) relating to Format changes). Capital Birmingham should not be allowed to make the changes to the Character of Service as this would essentially change the station from am urban/black music station to a hit music station format which can potentially stop playing urban music if they wanted to if in the future it becomes less mainstream. The format change represents a real danger to the radio landscape in Birmingham as it can so significantly reduce the choice of music available in the area over time. It will make the station sound too similar to it's main competitors in the area on FM. I am not happy with the decision in particular to remove the commitment to listeners of African or Afro-Caribbean origin in terms of content and music. I do not believe the music output of Capital Birmingham should be allowed to be aligned to that of Yorkshire or London without a readvertisement of the license as the change requested is far too significant. I believe that the format must retain the words 'URBAN CONTEMPORARY BLACK MUSIC' and 'REGGAE, RnB AND HIP HOP' in order to be an acceptable request. The new requested format is already provided in much better quality by BBC Radio 1. I am not happy with the way the station has been allowed to gradually change from Choice FM in the mid 90s to the present day Capital FM with such a dramatic change in music output despite only slight changes to the official OFCOM agreed station format, while Choice London and Capital FM co-exist in London providing 2 very different sounding services.
    [Show full text]
  • OPERF Private Equity Portfolio
    Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund Private Equity Portfolio As of December 31, 2019 ($ in millions) Vintage Capital Total Capital Total Capital Fair Market Total Value Partnership IRR2 Year Commitment Contributed Distributed Value Multiple 1,2 2000 2000 Riverside Capital Appreciation Fund $50.0 $45.7 $80.4 $0.0 1.80x 19.1% 2003 2003 Riverside Capital Appreciation Fund $75.0 $80.7 $157.2 $0.0 2.06x 17.2% 2012 A&M Capital Partners $100.0 $68.8 $82.9 $50.2 2.16x 28.8% 2018 A&M Capital Partners Europe I $151.5 $17.9 $0.0 $13.4 0.75x NM 2018 A&M Capital Partners II $200.0 $33.5 $0.0 $32.9 0.98x NM 2016 ACON Equity Partners IV $112.5 $58.9 $7.7 $42.4 0.83x ‐10.8% 2019 Advent Global Technology $50.0 $0.0 $0.0 ($0.6) 0.00x NM 2019 Advent International GPE IX $100.0 $11.5 $0.0 $10.4 0.91x NM 2008 Advent International GPE VI A $100.0 $100.0 $195.2 $15.8 2.11x 16.8% 2012 Advent International GPE VII C $50.0 $47.1 $45.7 $39.7 1.82x 15.7% 2015 Advent Latin American Private Equity Fund VI C $75.0 $56.8 $15.0 $61.4 1.35x 17.3% 2019 Advent Latin American Private Equity Fund VII $100.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 0.00x NM 2018 AEP IV OPERS Co‐Investments $37.5 $21.5 $0.0 $24.9 1.15x NM 2006 Affinity Asia Pacific Fund III $100.0 $95.3 $124.6 $10.9 1.42x 9.0% 2007 Apax Europe VII $199.5 $220.7 $273.6 $6.0 1.29x 4.5% 2016 Apax IX $250.0 $231.0 $6.6 $317.6 1.42x NM 2012 Apax VIII‐B $150.4 $158.8 $149.7 $115.5 1.70x 14.9% 2018 Apollo Investment Fund IX $480.0 $88.4 $0.9 $77.8 0.89x NM 2006 Apollo Investment Fund VI $200.0 $257.4 $385.2 $3.8 1.69x 8.7% 2008 Apollo
    [Show full text]
  • Global Industrials Trend Report: Q1 2014
    Global Industrials Trend Report: Q1 2014 Data analysis Quarterly Industrials M&A trend Even though the overall global M&A value saw an uptick in Q1 2014 (US$ 623.2bn) – up 10.1% on Q4 2013 and 38.6% on Q1 2013, – the Industrials sector (US$ 20.9bn in Q1 2014) did not manage to keep up with the growth. One of only two main sectors not to have a mega-deal announced during the quarter, it dropped by 44.3% from Q4 2013 (US$ 37.5bn) and by 7.6% from Q1 2013 (US$ 22.6bn) As a result, the sector’s combined deal value accounted for only 3.4% of global M&A in Q1 2014, and its share fell to the lowest levels since Q2 2009 (2%), with the sector losing almost half of its market share from Q4 2013 (6.6%). In contrast, TMT’s share of global M&A jumped from 23.5% in Q1 2013 and 16.5% in Q4 2013 to almost a third (28.5%) of all M&A in the first quarter of 2014 With the Technology sector gaining traction, the one Industrials sub-sector that appears to show strong performance is that with potential technology applications, Industrial automation. In fact, the sub-sector (US$ 1.3bn in Q1 2014) almost doubled from Q4 2014 (US$ 0.7bn), making Q1 2014’s value the sub-sector’s largest first-quarter value since Q1 2011 (US$ 1.3bn). The top Industrial automation deal this quarter was a US$ 548m-acquisition of Octo Telematics by Renova Group Industrials as a proportion of global M&A At the same time, the Industrial products and services sub-sector (US$ 17.3bn) slowed down, losing almost half of its value (48.5%) from Q4 2013 (US$ 33.6bn) and decreasing by 17.6% from Q1 2013 (US$ 21bn) The geography landscape of Industrials’ deals seems to be changing as well.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY SUMMARY of RADIO LISTENING Survey Period Ending 27Th March 2011
    QUARTERLY SUMMARY OF RADIO LISTENING Survey Period Ending 27th March 2011 PART 1 - UNITED KINGDOM (INCLUDING CHANNEL ISLANDS AND ISLE OF MAN) Adults aged 15 and over: population 51,618,000 Survey Weekly Reach Average Hours Total Hours Share in Period '000 % per head per listener '000 TSA % ALL RADIO Q 47266 92 20.5 22.4 1058098 100.0 ALL BBC Q 35074 68 11.3 16.6 581870 55.0 ALL BBC 15-44 Q 15955 63 7.6 12.1 193775 43.1 ALL BBC 45+ Q 19120 73 14.8 20.3 388095 63.7 All BBC Network Radio1 Q 31889 62 9.5 15.3 488535 46.2 BBC Local/Regional Q 10197 20 1.8 9.2 93335 8.8 ALL COMMERCIAL Q 34046 66 8.7 13.3 451178 42.6 ALL COMMERCIAL 15-44 Q 18556 73 9.5 13.0 241582 53.8 ALL COMMERCIAL 45+ Q 15490 59 8.0 13.5 209596 34.4 All National Commercial1 Q 15943 31 2.4 7.7 123363 11.7 All Local Commercial (National TSA) Q 27305 53 6.4 12.0 327815 31.0 Other Listening Q 3255 6 0.5 7.7 25051 2.4 Source: RAJAR/Ipsos MORI/RSMB 1 See note on back cover. For survey periods and other definitions please see back cover. Embargoed until 00.01 am Enquires to: RAJAR, 2nd floor, 5 Golden Square, London W1F 9BS 12th May 2011 Telephone: 020 7292 9040 Facsimile: 020 7292 9041 e mail: [email protected] Internet: www.rajar.co.uk ©Rajar 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Radio Is Very Much in Touch with ‘Love of Life Round Here’
    1 2 With Key 103 & Magic 1152’s weekly audience of 532,000 we can fill the Manchester Arena capacity 25 times! Source: RAJAR, Key 103 TSA. 6 Months, PE Sep 2012. Key 103 & Magic 1152 = Bauer Manchester 3 AUDIENCE POTENTIAL : 2,445,000 Male = 1,211,000 Female = 1,234,000 Source: RAJAR, Key 103 TSA. 6 Months, PE Sep 2012. 4 “Key 103 & Magic 1152 – Still Manchester’s Number One” • Key 103 and Magic 1152 retain their position as the commercial market leader in Greater Manchester with 532,000 listeners tuning into the stations each week. • Key 103’s Mike and Chelsea is Manchester’s most listened to commercial Breakfast show with 320,000 listeners tuning in each week, and OJ Borg’s Home time show continues to grow, increasing the station’s share in the afternoon to 8.9% (from 8) • In our core 25–44 demographic Key 103 remains number 1 for reach & share commercially, with a 17% higher share than Capital and 97.2% higher share for the demo than Smooth Source: RAJAR, Key 103 TSA. 6 Months, PE Sep 2012. Key 103 & Magic 1152 = Bauer Manchester 5 Combined Audience Mixed of adult contemporary music with unrivalled news and sports coverage, phone-ins and local information 61% 53% 47% 44% 39% 34% 22% Men Wome n 15 -24 25- 44 45+ ABC1 C2DE This shows a breakdown of our demographic here at Key103 & Magic 1152 to show a representation of the type of listeners we have and potential customers you could have. Breakdown by gender, age & social class in percentages respectively.
    [Show full text]