Submission No.51 Received 21 December

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Submission No.51 Received 21 December PAT CONDINA & ASSOCIATES Consultants in waterway, wetland and lake management, Water quality monitoring and assessment, Community consultation and education Overview of Flood Drainage Capacity of the Dalmore Road Drain with reference to Drains in the Koo Wee Rup Longwarry Flood Protection District Report prepared for Landowners in the Dalmore locality August 2012 Aspromonte Enviro Pty Ltd (ABN 31 074 579 936), Trading as Pat Condina & Associates Director - Pat Condina, M. Env. Sc., Grad. Dip. Water Sc., Dip. App. Chem. 17 Olive Rd., Devon Meadows, Victoria 3977 Telephone & Fax. 03 5998 2034 Email: [email protected] Drainage Capacity of Dalmore Road Drain and KLFPD Drains TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 1. Introduction and Scope of Study .............................................................................................. 6 2. The Catchment and KLFPD Background ................................................................................... 7 2.1 The Westernport Catchment .................................................................................................. 7 2.2 The Koo Wee Rup District and the Great Swamp ................................................................. 8 2.3 Drainage in the Koo Wee Rup District ................................................................................ 10 2.3.1 Brief History of Drainage .............................................................................................. 10 2.3.2 Significant Flow Events in the District.......................................................................... 12 2.3.3 Flood Risk and Flood Protection ................................................................................... 16 2.3.4 Carrier Drains, Precept Drains and District Drainage Charges ..................................... 17 2.3.5 Maintenance of Carrier Drains and Precept Drains ....................................................... 19 2.3.6 Drainage impact of Upstream Development ................................................................. 20 3 The Dalmore Road Drain Catchment ......................................................................................... 22 3.1 Drainage area and land uses ................................................................................................. 22 4. Capacity and Condition of Dalmore Road Drain ...................................................................... 24 4.1 Factors Effecting Theoretical Flow Capacity ...................................................................... 24 4.2 Dalmore Road Drain Surveys .............................................................................................. 25 4.3 The Floodgates on Dalmore Road Drain ............................................................................. 28 4.4 Possible Sources of Drain Sediment .................................................................................... 29 5. Observation Following June 2012 Storm Event ....................................................................... 31 5.1 Dalmore Road Drain Condition and Levels ......................................................................... 32 5.2 The Diversion to Cardinia Catch Drain ............................................................................... 34 6 Potential Strategies to Improve Drainage ................................................................................... 38 6.1 Drainage Improvements by Landowners. ......................................................................... 38 6.2 Drainage Improvements by Councils. .............................................................................. 38 6.3 Drainage Improvements by Melbourne Water .................................................................. 38 6.3.1 Improve Drainage Capacity of Dalmore Road Drain and other Precept Drains ........... 38 6.3.2 Prepare 5 year plans for Carrier Drain and Precept Drain Maintenance ....................... 39 6.4 Clarification of Regulatory Restrictions .............................................................................. 39 6.5 Summary of Problems and Potential Responses .................................................................. 41 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 43 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................... 44 Appendix 1 Monthly Rainfalls ................................................................................................... 44 Appendix 2 Melbourne Water Community Newsletter ............................................................ 47 Pat Condina & Associates August 2012 2 Drainage Capacity of Dalmore Road Drain and KLFPD Drains Executive Summary Scope of Study This Report was commissioned by Landowners in the Dalmore Road Drain catchment who were adversely affected in the February 2011 and June 2012 floods, and by earlier flood events. The Landowners have contended for many years that, if proper maintenance and infrastructure is in place, the Dalmore Road Drain would service its catchment. This Report supports the Landowner’s contention with reference to data and the author’s physical observations. While partly technical, the Report aims to increase Landowner understanding of the drainage system in their locality, measures to improve that system, the risk of flooding, and how such risk could be managed. It also aims to: • Document observations of flow and condition in the Dalmore Road Drain during the June 2012 flood; • Identify potential mitigation measures for Melbourne Water’s consideration and assessment, to improve the drainage characteristics of the Dalmore Road Drain and other drains, and • Provide an overview of drainage in the Kooweerup Longwarry Flood Protection District (“KLFPD”) with reference to level of protection, flood drainage capacity and other challenges in both “Carrier” drains and “special Precept” drains. The Westernport Catchment and District Background The KLFPD covers an area of approximately 420 km2, and is totally within the wider 2980 km2 catchment draining to Westernport Bay. It is one of the most important food production areas in the state. The 40,000 hectare Kooweerup Swamp was drained in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s, by construction of over 500 km of major and minor channels to convey stream flows from the upstream catchment, and local runoff through the Swamp, to Westernport Bay. The draining and clearing of the Kooweerup Swamp was the largest swamp reclamation scheme undertaken in Victoria and resulted in major hydrological changes, accompanied by equally significant changes in the generation, transport and export of stormwater pollutants to Western Port Bay. The extraordinary flood of 30 November/1 December 1934 resulted in flows never seen before or since with great loss of property and stock. The subsequent Royal Commission noted the deficiencies in the drainage system and recommended that substantial improvements be made. The completion of the spillway at Cora Lynn in 1962 to divert floodwater into the Yallock outfall and so protect the township of Koo Wee Rup was the last major work to take place in the KLFPD until the Main Drain rehabilitation works in 2001. Pat Condina & Associates August 2012 3 Drainage Capacity of Dalmore Road Drain and KLFPD Drains The key issue for the continuing sustainability of the KLFPD is the level of flood protection provided, and the level of drain maintenance to achieve required protection. While residents and farmers may be accepting of losses from major flood events every 30, 50 or 100 years they will not be accepting of losses every 10 or 15 years. Loss of crops is not just related to size of the flood, it is probably even more dependent on duration of high levels in drains for long periods after rainfall ceases, as this prevents effective drainage of surrounding land. In recent years District landowners have expressed concern over perceived lack of adequate maintenance on Carrier and Precept drains and the consequent increased risk of overtopping, longer periods of land inundation, and crop losses. Landowners in the KLFPD pay a special “Precept” rate rather than the normal Metropolitan waterways and drainage rate. The Precept rate is to cover flood mitigation and maintenance services carried out by Melbourne Water on the extensive network of drains and channels within the District. In 2009/10, $980,907 was collected from 3544 properties within the District boundaries. The District is subject to external influences which may impact on the overall flood risk. This includes sea level rise and increased stormwater flows from the expansion of the urban growth areas to the north in the Shire of Pakenham and the City of Casey. The Dalmore Road Drain in the June 2012 flood event The Dalmore Drain catchment comprises a drainage area of 1075 hectares from Cardinia Road north of Cardinia to the outlet at Westernport Bay. By reference to site observations and past surveys this Report concludes that drain flow capacity has been diminished by sedimentation and the growth of bed and bank vegetation. The recent 21/22 June 2012 storm event highlighted the inability of the Dalmore Road Drain to effectively drain its contributing catchment within a reasonable period of time to ensure that pastures
Recommended publications
  • Rivers Monitoring and Evaluation Plan V1.0 2020
    i Rivers Monitoring and Evaluation Plan V1.0 2020 Contents Acknowledgement to Country ................................................................................................ 1 Contributors ........................................................................................................................... 1 Abbreviations and acronyms .................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Background and context ........................................................................................................ 3 About the Rivers MEP ............................................................................................................. 7 Part A: PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................... 18 Habitat ................................................................................................................................. 24 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................ 29 Engaged communities .......................................................................................................... 45 Community places ................................................................................................................ 54 Water for the environment ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019–20
    Cardinia Shire Council Annual Report 2019–20 www.cardinia.vic.gov.au Our inclusive statement Prepared by: Cardinia Shire Council encourages a sense of belonging Cardinia Shire Council within our shire. We support an inclusive community Acknowledgment comprised of people from diverse backgrounds, including and not limited to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Council wishes to acknowledge all who contributed people, people from cultural and linguistically diverse to this annual report. (CALD) backgrounds, those identifying as LGBTIQ+, people Published October 2020 of faith, and people of all ages, genders and abilities. © Cardinia Shire Council 2020 ABN: 32 210 906 807 20 Siding Avenue, Officer PO Box 7, Pakenham Vic 3810 (DX 81006) Phone: 1300 787 624 Email: [email protected] Web: www.cardinia.vic.gov.au Cardinia Shire Council 2 Annual Report 2019–20 Contents Report of operations Our performance Planning and accountability framework 70 Introduction Our Council Plan 71 Mayor’s foreword 6 Our people performance 72 CEO’s report 8 Our community performance 91 Fast facts 10 Our environment performance 99 Your rates at work 11 Our economy performance 115 Council snapshot 12 Our governance performance 124 Performance indicators 130 Year in review Our people 14 Our community 19 Performance statement Our environment 24 Description of municipality Our economy 27 Impact of COVID-19 on municipality Our governance 29 Sustainable capacity indicators Description of operation 31 Service performance indicators Financial summary 37 Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Environmental Flows Monitoring and Assessment Program (VEFMAP) Stage 6
    Victorian Environmental Flows Monitoring and Assessment Program (VEFMAP) Stage 6 Project Update – 2018 Southern Victorian Rivers - Fish Background 2017/18 Survey Sites and Timing The Victorian Environmental Flows Monitoring and In 2017/18, surveys were undertaken to investigate Assessment Program (VEFMAP) was established by processes associated with KEQ 1 and 2 in the following the Victorian Government in 2005 to monitor and sites: assess ecosystem responses to environmental watering in priority rivers across Victoria. The program’s results • Immigration - the lower reaches of the Barwon, help inform decisions for environmental watering by Bunyip, Glenelg, Tarwin and Werribee rivers and Victoria’s Catchment Management Authorities (CMAs), Cardinia Creek (Sept-Dec 2017). Melbourne Water and the Victorian Environmental • Dispersal - the Glenelg and Moorabool rivers Water Holder (VEWH). Over the past 12 years, the (Jan-Feb 2018). information collected through VEFMAP has provided valuable data and informed significant changes to the • Distribution and recruitment - the Glenelg and program. VEFMAP is now in its sixth stage of delivery Thomson rivers (Feb-Mar 2018). and includes a strong focus on “intervention” or “flow event” type questions, for vegetation and fish. Fish Monitoring - Southern Victorian Rivers The core objective for fish monitoring in VEFMAP Stage 6 for coastal rivers is to examine the importance of environmental flows in promoting immigration, dispersal and subsequent recruitment of diadromous fish. There are two key evaluation questions for fish in coastal Victorian rivers, which were developed in collaboration with CMAs. KEQ 1 Do environmental flows enhance immigration of diadromous fishes in coastal streams? Figure 1: A juvenile (top) and adult (bottom) Tupong KEQ 2 Do environmental flows enhance dispersal, (Photo: ARI) distribution and recruitment of diadromous fishes in coastal streams? delwp.vic.gov.au VEFMAP Stage 6 Southern Victorian Rivers - Fish Methods January following a rain event in late December.
    [Show full text]
  • EMERALD District Strategy
    EMERALD District Strategy Adopted by Council Road 15 June 2009 Road Monbulk Emerald Golf Club acclesfield Road Emerald Gembro Belgrave Wright Forest L Road Wellington Beaconsfield Emerald Road Prepared by: Cardinia Shire Council Strategic Planning Unit in association with Emerald Strategy Review Steering Committee SMEC Urban and Land Design Partnership Published June 2009 © Cardinia Shire Council 2009 (ABN: 32 210 906 807) Henty Way, Pakenham PO Box 7, Pakenham Vic 3810 Phone: 1300 787 624 Fax: (03) 5941 3784 Email: [email protected] Web: www.cardinia.vic.gov.au TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................1 1.1. Purpose of the Strategy................................................................................................1 1.2. Strategy Area .................................................................................................................1 2. SNAPSHOT OF EMERALD ............................................................................ 3 2.1. History............................................................................................................................3 2.2. Demographic Profile....................................................................................................4 2.3. Policy Context...............................................................................................................5 3. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND FRAMEWORK PLAN ............................. 7 3.1. Key trends .....................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL RIVERS AND STREAMS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS June 1991 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 7 July 1992, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origins of the changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D.H.F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R.W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.A.; Director - Natural Resource Systems, Department of Conservation and Environment (Deputy Chairman) D.M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. W.A. Chamley, B.Sc., D.Phil.; Director - Fisheries Management, Department of Conservation and Environment S.M. Ferguson, M.B.E. M.D.A. Gregson, E.D., M.A.F., Aus.I.M.M.; General Manager - Minerals, Department of Manufacturing and Industry Development A.E.K. Hingston, B.Behav.Sc., M.Env.Stud., Cert.Hort. P. Jerome, B.A., Dip.T.R.P., M.A.; Director - Regional Planning, Department of Planning and Housing M.N. Kinsella, B.Ag.Sc., M.Sci., F.A.I.A.S.; Manager - Quarantine and Inspection Services, Department of Agriculture K.J. Langford, B.Eng.(Ag)., Ph.D , General Manager - Rural Water Commission R.D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director - National Parks and Public Land, Department of Conservation and Environment K.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Supply Area–Extractive Industry Interest Areas Review
    DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Melbourne Supply AreaExtractive Industry Interest Areas Review Geological Survey of Victoria Technical Record 2003/2 A. Olshina & P. Burn Bibliographic reference: Olshina, A. & Burn, P., 2003. Melbourne Supply AreaExtractive Industry Interest Areas Review. Geological Survey of Victoria. Technical Record 2003/2. Geological Survey of Victoria. Ó Crown (State of Victoria) Copyright 2003 Geological Survey of Victoria ISSN 1324 0307 ISBN 1 74106 838 X Keywords: extractive industry, quarry, planning, Melbourne, Victoria, stone resources, sand resources This report may be purchased from: The authors would like to thank Gayle Ellis for Business Centre, proofreading and typesetting this report. Department of Primary Industries Eighth Floor, 240 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, 3002 Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the Or accessed at: State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/ that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and For further technical information contact: therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or Manager, other consequences which may arise from you relying Geological Survey of Victoria, on any information in this publication. P O Box 500 East Melbourne 3002. Acknowledgments: Many of the original concepts and planning policies used in this report were developed by Barbara Guerin and the Environment and Natural Resources Committee (ENRC) and by Frank Jiricek, formerly of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment. The following MPD staff contributed to this document: Ben White provided significant assistance to the consultation process for this report. Roger Buckley and Linda Bibby provided valuable input to the contents of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Village Bell"
    re-created copy 2 UNDERAGE CAFE The following letter was received by the "Village Bell". It was written by the kids from the Underage Cafe and signed by 68 people, including proprietors of neighbouring shops. An article in the "Pakenham Gazette" (Jan 23rd 1991) also addresses this issue. "This letter is in response to the untrue anonymous letter which was sent by the so-called concerned parent in Upper Beaconsfield concerning Jenny Elsby and the Underage Cafe. It is quite obvious this person who has the nerve to write such a slanderous letter does not know Jenny, her family, or how she runs the Underage Cafe. Being regular customers of the Cafe we feel that if people take note of the letter that was written to the Council and local newspapers it will damage Jenny's reputation and all the good that the cafe does. Jenny has helped many of us and is always prepared to give us moral support. "As for the lies about her supplying us with alcohol and being a bad mother, this person obviously gets their kicks out of involving themselves in other peoples private affairs and making up lies that could ruin reputations and could close down Underage Cafe. No matter what any-one says the Cafe has given kids of Upper Beaconsfield a place where we can enjoy each others company in an alcohol and drug free environment." "Village Bell" has heard no adverse comments about the Cafe since it opened. One comment made to us was that the Cafe was very well supervised and provided a much needed meeting place for teenagers.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Names of Casey and Cardinia
    Place Names of Casey and Cardinia Casey Cardinia Libraries have compiled this list of place names and their meanings from the City of Casey and Cardinia Shire and related neighbouring areas. It includes early schools in the area, as school names often reflected the fluidity of town names in the early days. They also indicate the locations of towns that no longer exist. Army Road, Pakenham Army Road marks the location of the Salvation Army boy's home established in Pakenham in 1900. It subsequently became a home for Girls and then an Old Men's Home. The home closed in the 1920s. The Army Road School. No.3847, operated intermittently form 1914 until 1947. (W, V) Avonsleigh John (J.W) and Anna wright owned a guesthouse called Avonsleigh House at the corner of Emerald-Macclesfield and Emerald Roads. The name was adopted in 1911. The area was previously known as East Emerald. See also Wright Railway Station. (C) Balla Balla The Balla Balla run on Rutherford inlet was taken up in 1839 by Robert Innes Allan. The meaning is uncertain. Ballarat is aboriginal for resting or camping place from balla 'resting on one's elbow; and arat 'place', so it could mean 'resting'. Another possible meaning is 'mud'.There is a Balla Balla river, near Whim Creek, in the Pilbara Western Australia which was first recorded by Surveyor, Alexander Forrest in 1879. The name is thought to be derived from the Aboriginal word parla, from the Kariyarra language, meaning 'mud'. (B) Ballarto Road John Bakewell retained ownership of the Tooradin run in 1856 when his partnership with John Mickle and William Lyall dissolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Region
    Section 3 Central Region 49 3.1 Central Region overview .................................................................................................... 51 3.2 Yarra system ....................................................................................................................... 53 3.3 Tarago system .................................................................................................................... 58 3.4 Maribyrnong system .......................................................................................................... 62 3.5 Werribee system ................................................................................................................. 66 3.6 Moorabool system .............................................................................................................. 72 3.7 Barwon system ................................................................................................................... 77 3.7.1 Upper Barwon River ............................................................................................... 77 3.7.2 Lower Barwon wetlands ........................................................................................ 77 50 3.1 Central Region overview 3.1 Central Region overview There are six systems that can receive environmental water in the Central Region: the Yarra and Tarago systems in the east and the Werribee, Maribyrnong, Moorabool and Barwon systems in the west. The landscape Community considerations The Yarra River flows west from the Yarra Ranges
    [Show full text]
  • Darley-Power-Fight.Pdf
    Response to the Renewable Energy Zone Development Plan Directions Paper I am contacting you to provide feedback on the State Government of Victoria REZ Development Plan Directions Paper with specific reference to the Western: V3 Project, the Western Victoria Transmission Network Project (WVTNP) North Ballarat to Bulgana. This project involves constructing a 500kV overhead transmission line from North Ballarat to Sydenham. The project has been identified in the REZ Development Plan Directions Paper as having a ‘High Risk’ of delivery for the following reasons: • Project within greenfield area therefore vegetation clearing required. • Infrastructure close to sensitive areas • Conflicting land use • Potential conflicting regarding future residential development. • Potential community concerns regarding increased visual impacts and environmental impacts. The proponent for the WVTNP, AusNet Services, has identified an Area of Interest (AoI) and has further narrowed potential corridors, one of these is immediately north of Darley between existing residential and the Lerderderg State Park. I am the spokesperson for Darley Power Fight, a group representing communities in Darley, Coimadai and Merrimu, Victoria. We are in full support of Renewable Energy Zones provided associated projects are delivered through effective stakeholder consultation with consideration of communities, the environment, and economic impacts. The current regulatory framework does not consider the projects disbenefit and only considers project cost versus economic benefit
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Guidelines for River Management Works
    ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR RIVER MANAGEMENT WORKS FOR THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON RIVERS AND CATCHMENTS 8571(F1) Published for the Standing Committee on Rivers and Catchments by the Department of Conservation & Environment Edited by Georgina Katsantoni Designed and Typeset by Dead Set, Fitzroy Printed by Victorian Government Printing Office ISBN 07306 2062 X © 1990 GUIDELINES Gu IDELINES FOREWORD INTRODUCTION TO RIVER MORPHOLOGY AND ECOLOGY 1 RIVER MORPHOLOGY 1 RIVER ECOLOGY 6 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES 11 STREAM MORPHOLOGY 11 PROTECTING THE STREAM ENVIRONMENT 12 RECREATION 14 GUIDELINES Guidelines Foreword The Department of Conservation and Environment is involved in river management activities throughout Victoria. Most river management works are undertaken by statutory river management authorities which receive funding through the Office of Water Resources. The Department recognizes its responsibility to ensure that stream works take adequate steps to protect or enhance the aquatic and streamside environment. This report is one in a series prepared for the Standing Committee on Rivers and Catchments to assist government agencies and other authorities involved in river management. It provides a basic introduction to river morphology and ecology and describes the environmental effects of river management works. It also brings together a number of case studies and suggests ways in which major types of river management works should be carried out to protect stream environments. Horrie Poussard Convenor Standing Committee on Rivers and Catchments GUIDELINES Introduction to River Morphology and Ecology When Europeans settled in Victoria less than River morphology two centuries ago, these natural instabilities were This introduction to river morphology briefly regarded as incompatible with the way the land was describes and explains the processes which have to be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 6.4: Melbourne Water Flood
    Page 1 of 58 Report to the Future Melbourne (Environment) Committee Agenda item 6.4 Melbourne Water Flood Management Strategy – Port Phillip and 15 March 2016 Westernport Presenter: Geoff Robinson, Manager Engineering Services Purpose and background 1. Melbourne Water has requested that the Melbourne City Council formally endorse its Flood Management Strategy (the Strategy) – Port Phillip and Westernport released in December 2015 (Attachment 2). 2. Endorsement of the Strategy is intended to support the delivery of the Strategy through the establishment of collaborative working relationships across the various agencies to ensure effective flood management across the catchment. 3. The Strategy is aligned with the Victorian Government’s state wide revised draft Floodplain Management Strategy, emergency management arrangements and planning policy. Key issues 4. The Strategy was developed by Melbourne Water through extensive community and stakeholder consultation. It builds on the many years of flood management experience within Melbourne Water and local government to improve the planning and management of flood risks within the Port Phillip and Westernport catchment. The catchment covers an area of 13,000 kM2 and includes 38 Melbourne metropolitan Councils and Government agencies, a current population of over four million people and 232,000 vulnerable properties within the current 1 in 100 year flood zone. The catchment’s population is forecast to almost double in size by 2050. 5. The catchment has a history of regular flooding and property inundation. The major rivers and creeks within the catchment include the Yarra River and its main tributaries including the Maribyrnong River, Moonee Ponds Creek, Gardiners and Merri Creeks, plus the Werribee River, Dandenong Creek and Bunyip River sub-catchments.
    [Show full text]