DOCSLIB.ORG

Deep-Space Opportunities for Smallsats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deep-Space Opportunities for Smallsats NASA’S SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM: DEEP-SPACE OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMALLSATS 4S Symposium Kimberly Robinson, Ph.D. Payloads Manager Carole McLemore, Ph.D. Secondary Payloads Integration Manager Space Launch System Program May 29, 2018 0496 0496 NASA’S EXPLORATION PLANS 0496 SLS – ENABLING HUMAN EXPLORATION EXPLORATION CLASS: DEEP SPACE CAPABILITIES • Five times more volume than any contemporary heavy lift vehicle VOLUME Orion 8m fairing • Only vehicle that can carry the Orion and a co- with with large manifested payload to the Moon Science aperture Missions telescope • Block 1: Can launch 60% more mass than any contemporary launch vehicle MASS • Block 2: Mars-enabling capability of greater than Contemporary SLS Block 1 SLS Block 2 Heavy Lift Exploration Exploration 45 metric tons to Trans Lunar Injection Class Class • Reduce transit times by half or greater to the outer DEPARTURE solar system ENERGY 0496 SLS BLOCK 1 CONFIGURATION FOR EM-1 Launch Abort System (LAS) Crew Module (CM) Service Module (SM) Encapsulated Service Module (ESM) Panels Spacecraft Adapter Orion Stage Adapter Orion Spacecraft Lockheed Martin 5 Segment Solid Rocket Boosters (2) Orbital ATK Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) Boeing/United Launch Alliance Launch Vehicle Stage Adapter Teledyne Brown Engineering Core Stage & Avionics Boeing RS-25 Engines (4) Aerojet Rocketdyne 0496 SOLID ROCKET BOOSTERS 0496 ENGINES 0496 CORE STAGE 0496 IN-SPACE STAGE AND ADAPTERS 0496 EXPLORATION MISSION-1 FULL SYSTEMS CHECKOUT PRIOR TO CREWED MISSIONS 0496 SAMPLE DEPLOYMENT LOCATIONS 0496 ONE LAUNCH, MULTIPLE DISCIPLINES SMALLSATS TO BE DEPLOYED FROM THE ORION STAGE ADAPTER MOON ASTEROID • Lunar Flashlight (NASA) • NEA Scout (NASA) • Lunar IceCube (Morehead State University) EARTH • LunaH-Map (Arizona State University) • EQUULEUS (JAXA) • OMOTENASHI (JAXA) • LunIR (Lockheed Martin) AND BEYOND • Biosentinel (NASA) SUN • ArgoMoon (ESA/ASI) • CuSP (Southwest • Cislunar Explorers Research Institute) (Cornell University) • CU-E3 (University of Colorado Boulder) • Team Miles (Miles Space) 0496 ONE LAUNCH, MULTIPLE DISCIPLINES 13 SMALLSATS TO BE DEPLOYED FROM THE ORION STAGE ADAPTER 0496 EM-1 SECONDARY PAYLOAD CAPABILITY Forward Ring Electrical Panels Secondary Payloads Cabling Avionics Box (2 places) OSA Diaphragm Secondary Payload Brackets (13) Isogrid Barrel Panels Access Cover Aft Ring (2 places) Orion Stage Adapter (OSA) 0496 SLS EVOLVABILITY Height 322 ft 364 ft 327 ft 364 ft 365 ft Launch Abort Launch Abort System System Orion Orion Launch Abort System Universal Universal Stage Adapter Cargo Fairing Stage Adapter Cargo Fairing Foundation Orion Exploration Exploration Exploration for a Interim Cryogenic Upper Stage Upper Stage Upper Stage Propulsion Stage Interstage Interstage Interstage generation Launch Vehicle of deep Stage Adapter Core Stage Core Stage Core Stage Core Stage space exploration Solid Solid Rocket Rocket Evolved Evolved Boosters Boosters Boosters Boosters RS-25 Engines SLS Block 1 SLS Block 1B Crew SLS Block 1B Cargo SLS Block 2 Crew SLS Block 2 Cargo 0496 FUTURE SLS EXPLORATION MISSION OPTIONS FOR SMALL PAYLOADS ~61 cm 10 1U Football 6U 12U 27U Ring Payload Interface (Notional) cm 14kg 25kg 54kg ~180kg VOLUME AND MASS RANGE 0496 SUMMARY • SLS provides unique opportunities for smallsats –Affordable access to the Moon and deep space –Payloads ranging from 6U/12U/27U to ESPA-class may be accommodated • EM-1 launching in fiscal year 2020, with 13 CubeSats manifested • Hardware for second mission in progress • Call for next SLS CubeSat payloads planned for this summer • Flexible architecture will meet demands of deep space exploration –Flight manifest may include multiple Block 1 flights More Information • SLS Mission Planner’s Guide (ESD 30000) –Provides future payload developers/users with information to support preliminary SLS mission planning –Copies can be requested via email: [email protected] –www.nasa.gov/opportunities for CubeSat payload opportunities and announcements 0496 0496 DEEP-SPACE OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMALLSATS 0496.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • [Paper Number]
    NASA’s Space Launch System: Deep-Space Delivery for Smallsats Dr. Kimberly F. Robinson1 and George Norris2 NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, 35812 ABSTRACT Designed for human exploration missions into deep space, NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) represents a new spaceflight infrastructure asset, enabling a wide variety of unique utilization opportunities. While primarily focused on launching the large systems needed for crewed spaceflight beyond Earth orbit, SLS also offers a game-changing capability for the deployment of small satellites to deep-space destinations, beginning with its first flight. Currently, SLS is making rapid progress toward readiness for its first launch in two years, using the initial configuration of the vehicle, which is capable of delivering 70 metric tons (t) to Low Earth Orbit (LEO). On its first flight test of the Orion spacecraft around the moon, accompanying Orion on SLS will be small-satellite secondary payloads, which will deploy in cislunar space. The deployment berths are sized for “6U” CubeSats, and on EM-1 the spacecraft will be deployed into cislunar space following Orion separate from the SLS Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage. Payloads in 6U class will be limited to 14 kg maximum mass. Secondary payloads on EM-1 will be launched in the Orion Stage Adapter (OSA). Payload dispensers will be mounted on specially designed brackets, each attached to the interior wall of the OSA. For the EM-1 mission, a total of fourteen brackets will be installed, allowing for thirteen payload locations. The final location will be used for mounting an avionics unit, which will include a battery and sequencer for executing the mission deployment sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cubesat Mission to Study Solar Particles (Cusp) Walt Downing IEEE Life Senior Member Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society President (2020-2021)
    The CubeSat Mission to Study Solar Particles (CuSP) Walt Downing IEEE Life Senior Member Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society President (2020-2021) Acknowledgements – National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and CuSP Principal Investigator, Dr. Mihir Desai, Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) Feature Articles in SYSTEMS Magazine Three-part special series on Artemis I CubeSats - April 2019 (CuSP, IceCube, ArgoMoon, EQUULEUS/OMOTENASHI, & DSN) ▸ - September 2019 (CisLunar Explorers, OMOTENASHI & Iris Transponder) - March 2020 (BioSentinnel, Near-Earth Asteroid Scout, EQUULEUS, Lunar Flashlight, Lunar Polar Hydrogen Mapper, & Δ-Differential One-Way Range) Available in the AESS Resource Center https://resourcecenter.aess.ieee.org/ ▸Free for AESS members ▸ What are CubeSats? A class of small research spacecraft Built to standard dimensions (Units or “U”) ▸ - 1U = 10 cm x 10 cm x 11 cm (Roughly “cube-shaped”) ▸ - Modular: 1U, 2U, 3U, 6U or 12U in size - Weigh less than 1.33 kg per U NASA's CubeSats are dispensed from a deployer such as a Poly-Picosatellite Orbital Deployer (P-POD) ▸NASA’s CubeSat Launch initiative (CSLI) provides opportunities for small satellite payloads to fly on rockets ▸planned for upcoming launches. These CubeSats are flown as secondary payloads on previously planned missions. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/home/CubeSats_initiative What is CuSP? NASA Science Mission Directorate sponsored Heliospheric Science Mission selected in June 2015 to be launched on Artemis I. ▸ https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/heliophys ics-cubesat-to-launch-on-nasa-s-sls Support space weather research by determining proton radiation levels during solar energetic particle events and identifying suprathermal properties that could help ▸ predict geomagnetic storms.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Flashlight & NEA Scout
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lunar Flashlight & NEA Scout A NanoSat Architecture for Deep Space Exploration Payam Banazadeh (JPL/Caltech) Andreas Frick (JPL/Caltech) EM-1 Secondary Payload Selection • 19 NASA center-led concepts were evaluated and 3 were down-selected for further refinement by AES toward a Mission Concept Review (MCR) planned for August 2014 • Primary selection criteria: - Relevance to Space Exploration Strategic Knowledge Gaps (SKGs) - Life cycle cost - Synergistic use of previously demonstrated technologies - Optimal use of available civil servant workforce Payload Strategic Knowledge Gaps Mission Concept NASA Centers Addressed BioSentinel Human health/performance in high- Study radiation-induced DNA ARC/JSC radiation space environments damage of live organisms in cis- • Fundamental effects on biological systems lunar space; correlate with of ionizing radiation in space environments measurements on ISS and Earth Lunar Flashlight Lunar resource potential Locate ice deposits in the Moon’s JPL/MSFC/MHS • Quantity and distribution of water and other permanently shadowed craters volatiles in lunar cold traps Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) NEA Characterization Slow flyby/rendezvous and Scout • NEA size, rotation state (rate/pole position) characterize one NEA in a way MSFC/JPL How to work on and interact with NEA that is relevant to human surface exploration • NEA surface mechanical properties 2 EM-1: Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) Scout concept WHY NEA Scout? – Characterize a NEA with an imager to address key Strategic
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Sail Propulsion for Deep Space Exploration
    Solar Sail Propulsion for Deep Space Exploration Les Johnson NASA George C. Marshall Space Flight Center NASA Image We tend to think of space as being big and empty… NASA Image Space Is NOT Empty. We can use the environments of space to our advantage NASA Image Solar Sails Derive Propulsion By Reflecting Photons Solar sails use photon “pressure” or force on thin, lightweight, reflective sheets to produce thrust. 4 NASA Image Real Solar Sails Are Not “Ideal” Billowed Quadrant Diffuse Reflection 4 Thrust Vector Components 4 Solar Sail Trajectory Control Solar Radiation Pressure allows inward or outward Spiral Original orbit Sail Force Force Sail Shrinking orbit Expanding orbit Solar Sails Experience VERY Small Forces NASA Image 8 Solar Sail Missions Flown Image courtesy of Univ. Surrey NASA Image Image courtesy of JAXA Image courtesy of The Planetary Society NanoSail-D (2010) IKAROS (2010) LightSail-1 & 2 CanX-7 (2016) InflateSail (2017) NASA JAXA (2015/2019) Canada EU/Univ. of Surrey The Planetary Society Earth Orbit Interplanetary Earth Orbit Earth Orbit Deployment Only Full Flight Earth Orbit Deployment Only Deployment Only Deployment / Flight 3U CubeSat 315 kg Smallsat 3U CubeSat 3U CubeSat 10 m2 196 m2 3U CubeSat <10 m2 10 m2 32 m2 9 Planned Solar Sail Missions NASA Image NASA Image NASA Image Near Earth Asteroid Scout Advanced Composite Solar Solar Cruiser (2025) NASA (2021) NASA Sail System (TBD) NASA Interplanetary Interplanetary Earth Orbit Full Flight Full Flight Full Flight 100 kg spacecraft 6U CubeSat 12U CubeSat 1653 m2 86
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Life Sciences Payload Assessment
    Lunar Surface Science Workshop 2020 (LPI Contrib. No. 2241) 5077.pdf LUNAR LIFE SCIENCES PAYLOAD ASSESSMENT. S. C. Sun1, F. Karouia2, M. P. Lera3, M. P. Parra1, H. E. Ray4, A. J. Ricco1, S. M. Spremo1. 1NASA Ames Research Center, 2Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, 3KBR, 4ASRC Federal Space and Defense, Inc. Introduction: The Moon provides a unique site to ISS, including systems that integrate into EXPRESS study living organisms. The fractional gravity and (EXpedite the PRocessing of ExperimentS for Space) unique radiation environment have similarities to Mars Racks or are external space exposure research facilities. and will help us understand how life will respond to These same systems can be the basis for future payload conditions on the red planet. Martian and lunar envi- systems for experiments to be performed beyond Low ronments can be simulated on the ground but not to high Earth Orbit. Such facilities would need to be adapted to fidelity. Altered gravity and increased radiation are dif- be compatible with the new research platforms and ficult to replicate simultaneously, which makes study- function in the harsher radiation environment found out- ing their combined effect difficult. The International side the magnetosphere. If Gateway and a lunar based- Space Station, and previously, the Space Shuttle, pro- lab could provide EXPRESS-compatible interfaces, lev- vided a microgravity environment, and could simulate eraging hardware developed for ISS would be more fea- fractional-g only via an onboard centrifuge. Because sible. the ISS and Space Shuttle orbits were within the Earth’s Gaps in Capabilities: Many of the payload systems magnetosphere, experiments on those platforms have that have been developed require human tending.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Technologies for Biological Experiments in Deep Space
    Developing technologies for biological experiments in deep space Sergio R. Santa Maria Elizabeth Hawkins Ada Kanapskyte NASA Ames Research Center [email protected] NASA’s life science programs STS-1 (1981) STS-135 (2011) 1973 – 1974 1981 - 2011 2000 – 2006 – Space Shuttle International Skylab Bio CubeSats Program Space Station Microgravity effects - Nausea / vomit - Disorientation & sleep loss - Body fluid redistribution - Muscle & bone loss - Cardiovascular deconditioning - Increase pathogenicity in microbes Interplanetary space radiation What type of radiation are we going to encounter beyond low Earth orbit (LEO)? Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs): - Interplanetary, continuous, modulated by the 11-year solar cycle - High-energy protons and highly charged, energetic heavy particles (Fe-56, C-12) - Not effectively shielded; can break up into lighter, more penetrating pieces Challenges: biology effects poorly understood (but most hazardous) Interplanetary space radiation Solar Particle Events (SPEs) - Interplanetary, sporadic, transient (several min to days) - High proton fluxes (low and medium energy) - Largest doses occur during maximum solar activity Challenges: unpredictable; large doses in a short time Space radiation effects Space radiation is the # 1 risk to astronaut health on extended space exploration missions beyond the Earth’s magnetosphere • Immune system suppression, learning and memory impairment have been observed in animal models exposed to mission-relevant doses (Kennedy et al. 2011; Britten et al. 2012) • Low doses of space radiation are causative of an increased incidence and early appearance of cataracts in astronauts (Cuccinota et al. 2001) • Cardiovascular disease mortality rate among Apollo lunar astronauts is 4-5-fold higher than in non-flight and LEO astronauts (Delp et al.
    [Show full text]
  • KPLO, ISECG, Et Al…
    NationalNational Aeronautics Aeronautics and Space and Administration Space Administration KPLO, ISECG, et al… Ben Bussey Chief Exploration Scientist Human Exploration & Operations Mission Directorate, NASA HQ 1 Strategic Knowledge Gaps • SKGs define information that is useful/mandatory for designing human spaceflight architecture • Perception is that SKGs HAVE to be closed before we can go to a destination, i.e. they represent Requirements • In reality, there is very little information that is a MUST HAVE before we go somewhere with humans. What SKGs do is buy down risk, allowing you to design simpler/cheaper systems. • There are three flavors of SKGs 1. Have to have – Requirements 2. Buys down risk – LM foot pads 3. Mission enhancing – Resources • Four sets of SKGs – Moon, Phobos & Deimos, Mars, NEOs www.nasa.gov/exploration/library/skg.html 2 EM-1 Secondary Payloads 13 CUBESATS SELECTED TO FLY ON INTERIM EM-1 CRYOGENIC PROPULSION • Lunar Flashlight STAGE • Near Earth Asteroid Scout • Bio Sentinel • LunaH-MAP • CuSPP • Lunar IceCube • LunIR • EQUULEUS (JAXA) • OMOTENASHI (JAXA) • ArgoMoon (ESA) • STMD Centennial Challenge Winners 3 3 3 Lunar Flashlight Overview Looking for surface ice deposits and identifying favorable locations for in-situ utilization in lunar south pole cold traps Measurement Approach: • Lasers in 4 different near-IR bands illuminate the lunar surface with a 3° beam (1 km spot). Orbit: • Light reflected off the lunar • Elliptical: 20-9,000 km surface enters the spectrometer to • Orbit Period: 12 hrs distinguish water
    [Show full text]
  • AES-Secondaries-FS-V508b.Pdf
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Hitchhiking Into the Solar System: Launching NASA’s First Deep-Space CubeSats Introduction NASA is pioneering space through common capability and technology developments, enabling exploration and human STRATEGIC expansion across multiple solar system destinations, including to KNOWLEDGE GAPS an asteroid and Mars. This journey into deep space has begun with exploration systems testing and demonstrations on Earth and in space. Although uncrewed, the first flight of the Orion spacecraft in December 2014 was an initial step in demonstrating its ability to safely ferry astronauts beyond Earth into deep space. Strategic Knowledge Gaps, or SKGs, The next critical demonstration of NASA’s deep space exploration represent gaps in knowledge or capabilities will be on Exploration Mission (EM)-1 in 2018. This information required to reduce risk, first flight of NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket will increase effectiveness and improve launch an uncrewed Orion spacecraft to a stable orbit beyond the facts the design of robotic and human moon and return it to Earth. In addition to demonstrating NASA’s space exploration missions. NASA new heavy-lift capability, SLS has the capacity to accommodate uses SKGs to help inform research 11 6U-sized CubeSats, which will deploy once Orion spacecraft and investment strategies, and separation is confirmed and on a specified timeline based on their prioritize technology development for mission objectives. human and robotic exploration. NASA’s Advanced Exploration Systems Division has selected three secondary payloads for further development to launch on SLS — hitchhiking into deep space. The major driver for selection of these CubeSats was the risk reduction they enable by addressing key Strategic Knowledge Gaps (SKGs).
    [Show full text]
  • Three Editions of the Star Catalogue of Tycho Brahe*
    A&A 516, A28 (2010) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014002 & c ESO 2010 Astrophysics Three editions of the star catalogue of Tycho Brahe Machine-readable versions and comparison with the modern Hipparcos Catalogue F. Verbunt1 andR.H.vanGent2,3 1 Astronomical Institute, Utrecht University, PO Box 80 000, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 URU-Explokart, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80 115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands 3 Institute for the History and Foundations of Science, PO Box 80 000, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands Received 6 January 2010 / Accepted 3 February 2010 ABSTRACT Tycho Brahe completed his catalogue with the positions and magnitudes of 1004 fixed stars in 1598. This catalogue circulated in manuscript form. Brahe edited a shorter version with 777 stars, printed in 1602, and Kepler edited the full catalogue of 1004 stars, printed in 1627. We provide machine-readable versions of the three versions of the catalogue, describe the differences between them and briefly discuss their accuracy on the basis of comparison with modern data from the Hipparcos Catalogue. We also compare our results with earlier analyses by Dreyer (1916, Tychonis Brahe Dani Scripta Astronomica, Vol. II) and Rawlins (1993, DIO, 3, 1), finding good overall agreement. The magnitudes given by Brahe correlate well with modern values, his longitudes and latitudes have error distributions with widths of 2, with excess numbers of stars with larger errors (as compared to Gaussian distributions), in particular for the faintest stars. Errors in positions larger than 10, which comprise about 15% of the entries, are likely due to computing or copying errors.
    [Show full text]
  • Ongoing Opportunities to Fly to the Moon
    4th IAA Latin American CubeSat Workshop Ongoing opportunities to fly to the Moon Mikhail Ovchinnikov & Sergey Trofimov Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics [email protected] Motivation Staff of the Space Systems Dynamics Department at KIAM 2/21 On the shoulders of giants Luna 3 trajectory Luna 3 (1959) is the first minispacecraft (~279 kg) which flew by the Moon in a free-return trajectory Credit: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luna3- trajectory-eng.svg To get to a lunar orbit, large space probes (e.g., Apollo 11) have to perform a high ∆V lunar Credit: https://www.mpoweruk.com/Apollo_Moon_Shot.htm orbit insertion (LOI) maneuver 3/21 Two routes to the Moon CubeSats and other nano/microspacecraft have two options to get to the Moon: Low-thrust transfer from a near-Earth orbit (GTO, MEO, or even LEO) • No spacecraft of a nano or micro class has been launched yet (SMART-1, launched in 2003, had a mass of 300+ kg) Piggyback launch with a large mission • Artemis 1 (Orion + 13 CubeSats, including Lunar IceCube, Lunar Flashlight, EQUULEUS, Near-Earth Asteroid Scout etc.) 4/21 Low-thrust spiraling A spacecraft is ejected into the parking orbit (GTO or MEO is usually considered), then it starts spiraling, raises the orbit above the radiation belts, and continues thrusting till the lunar capture Lunar resonant encounters greatly assist in the perigee raising process 5/21 Pros and cons of spiraling + Launch opportunities are relatively frequent: there are a lot of GTO and MEO missions; many of them offer a secondary payload to be installed on board – Long thrusting arcs require both sophisticated pre- launch optimization and challenging post-launch operations (high accuracy of attitude stabilization, regular control updates etc.) – Extensive spacecraft bus shielding and/or expensive radiation-tolerant electronics (up to 50 krad or even higher) required – Very long transfer times (about 1.5 years) 6/21 SMART-1 low-thrust transfer Credit: J.
    [Show full text]
  • 25Th IAA SYMPOSIUM on SMALL SATELLITE MISSIONS (B4) Small Spacecraft for Deep-Space Exploration (8)
    Paper ID: 45356 69th International Astronautical Congress 2018 oral 25th IAA SYMPOSIUM ON SMALL SATELLITE MISSIONS (B4) Small Spacecraft for Deep-Space Exploration (8) Author: Dr. Stefano Campagnola National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Jet Propulsion Laboratory, United States, [email protected] Mr. Javier Hernando-Ayuso The University of TOKYO, Graduate school, Japan, [email protected] Mr. Kota Kakihara Japan, [email protected] Dr. Yosuke Kawabata The University of TOKYO, Graduate school, Japan, [email protected] Mr. Takuya Chikazawa University of Tokyo, Japan, [email protected] Prof. Ryu Funase University of Tokyo, Japan, [email protected] Dr. Naoya Ozaki Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), ISAS, Japan, [email protected] Dr. Nicola Baresi Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Japan, [email protected] Prof. Tatsuaki Hashimoto Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Japan, [email protected] Dr. Yasuhiro Kawakatsu Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Japan, [email protected] Mr. Toshinori Ikenaga Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Japan, [email protected] Mr. Kenshiro Oguri University of Colorado Boulder, United States, [email protected] Dr. Kenta Oshima National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Japan, [email protected] MISSION DESIGN OF THE EQUULEUS AND OMOTENASHI CUBESATS Abstract EQUULEUS and OMOTENASHI are two JAXA deep-space Cubesat, that would be launched into cis-lunar orbit by the first test flight of NASA's new Space Launch System. The mission design tasks and related research activities are carried by a team of students at The University of Tokyo and at the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (JAXA), under the guidance of JAXA and NASA/JPL researchers and engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, June 14, 2013 Odds on Equuleus Is Ready to Fire in North Like Everyone Else, Schadt Respects America Cup Captaintreacherous, but She Isn't Intimidated by Him
    Friday, June 14, 2013 Odds On Equuleus is Ready To Fire in North Like everyone else, Schadt respects America Cup Captaintreacherous, but she isn't intimidated by him. She By Bill Finley thinks the field is so deep that the race may not be won by This is not exactly how trainer Robin Schadt and owner the most talented horse but by the talented horse who gets the best trip. Dana Parham wanted the year to start for their stable star, "I like our chances," she said. "It's all going to come Odds On Equuleus (Art Major). The colt heads into down to how the race unfolds. I know it sounds like a Saturday's $1 million North America Cup winless on the year cliche but any horse can get beat on any given day. This is with just $12,500 in earnings. But the story of Odds On not going to be an easy test for any of these colts. It will be Equuleus can't be found in his past performance lines. This the biggest test any of them have ever had. No one is is a colt who might just be ready for the one of the best races of his career. going to get to the quarter, get a breather, be able to back Among the better 2-year-old it down. That's not going to happen. They're all going to face something they haven't faced yet." pacers in training last year when Schadt said the best thing about winning the race would earning $413,665, the son of Art be what it would mean to Parham.
    [Show full text]