DOCSLIB.ORG

Cubesat for Planetary Science and Exploration Breaking New Grounds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cubesat for Planetary Science and Exploration Breaking New Grounds CubeSat for Planetary Science and Exploration Breaking New Grounds Julie Castillo-Rogez, Research Scientist Jet Propulsion Laboratory Copyright 2015 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Classes of Applications Technology Demos Engineering/Ops Science INSPIRE (NASA/JPL MarCO (JPL) Europa CubeSats (NASA – Concepts) Use low-cost spacecraft For example telecom CubeSats that carry for technology testing relays during critical primary science, and validation in relevant operations for lander’s reconnaissance, or environment entry, descent, and opportunistic science landing; to support a investigations; by Human crew at Mars; to themselves or as facilitate teleoperations… daughtership INSPIRE, MarCO, and EM-1 CubeSats as Stepping Stones to Deep Space LEON 3 ‘Sphinx’ X-Band Transponder ‘Iris’ 3 Outline Science Pull for Planetary CubeSats 3U and 6U Planetary CubeSat Landscape Visions for Future Voyages Parting Thoughts Outline Science Pull for Planetary CubeSats NASA Strategic Goals Planetary Science Decadal Survey Priorities Multi-Scale Exploration Fields Science Pull for Planetary CubeSats IAA Planetary CubeSat Study (2015) . Science enablers . Distributed measurements for dynamic processes . Impactor/observer architecture (cooperating assets) . Alternative low-cost architectures . Fractionated payload for system science . High-risk, high-reward observations . Access to unique vantage points . Risk assessment by sacrificial probe . Breaking new grounds . Exploration of uncharted regions Outline Science Pull for Planetary CubeSats 3U and 6U Planetary CubeSat Landscape Science Applications Decadal Science Reconnaissance Pure Exploration LunaH -Map (NASA/ASU) Lunar Flashlight (NASA/JPL/MSFC) OCCAM (JPL – Concept) Addresses science Strategic knowledge gap Pure science exploration tracing from Vision and observations (e.g., of uncharted territories Voyages’ strategic BioSentinel, LF, NEAScout) (e.g., Earth’s Trojan questions (Origins, Reconnaissance prior to clouds), close comet or Habitability, Processes) sampling and landing NEA flyby e.g., LunaH-Map, AOSAT, Cu- (e.g., comet sample return) Cape CubeSat-Based Measurements that have been proposed so far • Fields and particles – Distributed/simultaneous magnetic field measurements – Dust and gas/plume composition – Radiation – Plasma characterization • Atmospheric Science – Distributed atmospheric measurements – Atmospheric composition (noble gases) • Reconnaissance – High-risk site study and reconnaissance (eg caves, landing sites, etc.) – Object characterization – Water search • In-Situ – Elemental, Isotopic & Mineralogical composition – Regolith mechanical properties – Surface dust dynamics State of Small Instruments <0.5 U available ~1 U available Miniaturization In Progress Magnetometer Miniaturization difficult (for science performance expectations) Use in Big Missions in Big Use Philae’s DIM (Dust Impact CSAC (atomic clock) Monitor) JPL’s Technology Demonstration CubeSats via Discovery Secondary Orbiter/Flyby Constellations ~48-72 hour operations with (semi-)autonomous operations and Mothership relay High Resolution Distributed, Simultaneous Particles Ice Prospecting Infrared Proximity Imaging & Fields Measurements Spectrometer Impactors/Landers Hitchhiking Deep Space Nano-Satellite ~48-72 hour surface science operations with mothership localization and relay Mothership-deployed s/c to other interplanetary support destinations Asteroid/Comet Instrumented Phobos Surface Landing w/ Deep Space Navigation & Radio Surface Penetrator Gamma Ray Spectrometer Science Demonstrations Copyright 2015 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged.13 Science has to Compete for Resources Deep Space Environment Challenges • Radiations require rad-hard subsystems and extra mass for shielding • Limited power beyond 1 AU impacts operations and science return Instrument volume is limited to 0.5-1 U o Small aperture/sampling drives integration time Long distance is severe limitation to science data retrieval o Data rates beyond the Moon are between 0.5 and 8 kbps o Long downlink times drive thermal issues 14 ?? SCIENCE PERFORMANCE METRICS Payload Sensitivity and Resolution - Scales with instrument size Delta-V - A few 100 m/s to km/s Pointing (control and stability) Loose (fields), up to 7.2 arcsec accuracy, 1 arcsec stability in 1 sec. Position Control – km-scale per radio-tracking; <100m with optical navigation Data Volume - 10s Mb for fields/particles; 100s Mb for geology and chemistry Mission Architectures (1/2) Independent CubeSat LEO Observatory CubeSat at the Moon And Beyond AOSAT (ASU) Lunar IceCube (MSU, GSFC) NEAScout (AES – MSFC/JPL/LaRC/JSC/GSFC) e.g., low-cost, low- e.g., Radiation e.g., physics, chemistry, gravity laboratories, monitoring, search for and processes meteor observatories, water, surface characterization for continuous Jupiter reconnaissance many objects photometry P/L DV Ptg Pos Data P/L DV Ptg Pos Data P/L DV Ptg Pos Data GOALS Near Earth Asteroid Scout Characterize one candidate NEA Marshall Space Flight Center/Jet Propulsion with an imager to address key Lab/LaRC/JSC/GSFC/NASA Strategic Knowledge Gaps (SKGs) One of three 6U Cubesats Demonstrates low cost capability sponsored by Advanced for HEOMD for NEA detection Exploration System, Joint and reconnaissance Robotic Program to fly on SLS EM-1 Measurements: NEA volume, spectral type, spin and orbital properties, address key physical and regolith mechanical SKGs Science Performance of NEAS 6U • Payload introduces IntelliCam • Meets resolution requirement of 10cm/pix at >500m distance • Meets sensitivity requirement to detect H=28 target at >10,000 km distance • Pointing control/stability is met • Pointing knowledge is limited by current technology • 0.5 to 1.7 km/s DV: Will definitely go places!! •Target pool is limited by camera aperture • Biggest limitation is data volume vs power/thermal •Mitigated with operational strategies •Science software to increase data acquisition robustness StrategiesData forHandling Science Imaging with with “Agile Constrained Science” Resources Target Reference stars ACTIVITIES Target Detection and approach Target Reconnaissance with Close Proximity Imaging with wide field imaging medium field imaging Local scale morphology, terrain Ephemeris determination Shape, spin, and local environment properties, landing site survey Downlink rate <1 kbps Short flyby time (<30 min) Short time at closest approach Large target position Uncertain environment (<10 min.) uncertainty Downlink rate <1 kbps past C/A CHALLENGES Autonomous sky scanning sequence Autonomous target pointing and gain setting Image co-adding Thumbnails, triage, lossless compression, subwindowing subwindowing Compression APPROACH Mission Architectures (2/2) Carrier/Relay Mother-Daughter Fractionated Architectures ESPA-Ring Hayabusa-2 and MASCOT Constellation (Concept) NanoSwarm (UCSC/Tyvak) Complementary vantage Distributed sensors for Ring provides most of points; remote vs. in situ field, atmosphere, or the DV and telecom exploration; cooperation system-wide exploration; relay; can reach asteroid for motion planning, etc. constellation networks main belt, potentially Can accommodate for event triangulation outer Solar system; various form factors P/L DV Ptg Pos Data P/L DV Ptg Pos Data P/L DV Ptg Pos Data In Situ Exploration with MASCOT On Hayabusa-2 µOmega MAG MASCOT’s Science Performance Mid-IR thermal Wide Angle Camera sensor Provides geological context • ~10 kg incl. 3 kg payload • Includes hopping mechanism • Lifetime of ~15 hr CAM • Data relay to mothership MARA altitude Home Position 20 km 3-axis fluxgate Imaging Spectrometer Deployment Magnetometer Altitude Regolith mineralogy at m-scale 100 m Remnant mag field Relocation Up-Righting Limited lifetime but efficient operational SDL-Phase On-Surface Operation timeline – will meet focused but important 1 asteroid day objectives to characterize NEO surface 1st Science Cycle D N N D 2nd Science Cycle Outline Science Pull for Planetary CubeSats 3U and 6U Planetary CubeSat Landscape Visions for Future Voyages New Deep Space Tailored CubeSat Subsystems X-Band 0.5m HGA Transponder ‘Iris’ LEON 3 Computer ‘Sphinx’ Hybrid Propulsion Copyright 2015 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. 25 Characterizing Europa’s Deep Ocean Distributed Magnetometer Network at Europa Particle detector (0.5 U) Flux gate magnetometer (0.5 U) • Based on INSPIRE’s design upgraded with electronics vault – fits in 3 U • Life time requirement is < 48 hours • Particle detector is combined with magnetometer and provides additional shielding 27 Landing Site Reconnaissance Explorer CubeSat for Student Involvement in Travels to Europa Attitude control is 10 cm/pix achieved via reaction wheels and thrusters • “Ranger-Style” probe relays images down to 1 km to the surface Pointing < 0.5 deg Best resolution < 10 cm/px • Based on INSPIRE’s design upgraded Impact angle > 70 deg, with electronics vault – fits in 3 U Illumination direction 45-70 deg. • Life time requirement is < 10 hours Comet Volatile Isotopic Composition for Origin Science To obtain a high-precision oxygen isotopic measurement from a Jupiter-family comet Mission to 46P/Wirtanen in December 2018 (<0.1 AU) • WISPER uses a millimeter wave spectrometer (cf. MIRO) • Mission would fly by <1000 km from Wirtanen • Performance requirement exceeded by ~50% Mission Concept - Pre-Decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Date Goes Here 31 Outline Science
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Moon Explorer Mission Concept
    New Moon Explorer Mission Concept Les JOHNSONa,*, John CARRa,Jared Jared DERVANa, Alexander FEWa, Andy HEATONa, Benjamin Malphrusd, Leslie MCNUTTa, Joe NUTHb, Dana Tursec, and Aaron Zuchermand aNASA MSFC, Huntsville, AL USA bNASA GSFC, Huntsville, AL USA cRoccor, Longmont, CO USA dMorehead State University, Morehead, KY USA Abstract New Moon Explorer (NME) is a smallsat reconnaissance mission concept to explore Earth’s ‘New Moon’, the recently discovered Earth orbital companion asteroid 469219 Kamoʻoalewa (formerly 2016HO3), using solar sail propulsion. NME would determine Kamoʻoalewa’s spin rate, pole position, shape, structure, mass, density, chemical composition, temperature, thermal inertia, regolith characteristics, and spectral type using onboard instrumentation. If flown, NME would demonstrate multiple enabling technologies, including solar sail propulsion, large-area thin film power generation, and small spacecraft technology tailored for interplanetary space missions. Leveraging the solar sail technology and mission expertise developed by NASA for the Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) Scout mission, affordably learning more about our newest near neighbor is now a possibility. The mission is not yet planned for flight. Keywords: Kamoʻoalewa, solar sail, moon, Apollo asteroid 1. Introduction The emerging capabilities of extremely small spacecraft, coupled with solar sail propulsion, offers an opportunity for low-cost reconnaissance of the recently- discovered asteroid 469219 Kamoʻoalewa (formerly 2016HO3). While Kamoʻoalewa is not strictly a new moon, it is, for all practical purposes, an orbital companion of the Earth as the planet circles the sun. Kamoʻoalewa’s orbit relative to the Earth can be seen in Figure 1. Using the technologies developed for the NASA Fig. 1 The orbit of Earth’s companion, Kamoʻoalewa Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) Scout mission, a 6U as both it and the Earth orbit the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cubesat Mission to Study Solar Particles (Cusp) Walt Downing IEEE Life Senior Member Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society President (2020-2021)
    The CubeSat Mission to Study Solar Particles (CuSP) Walt Downing IEEE Life Senior Member Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society President (2020-2021) Acknowledgements – National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and CuSP Principal Investigator, Dr. Mihir Desai, Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) Feature Articles in SYSTEMS Magazine Three-part special series on Artemis I CubeSats - April 2019 (CuSP, IceCube, ArgoMoon, EQUULEUS/OMOTENASHI, & DSN) ▸ - September 2019 (CisLunar Explorers, OMOTENASHI & Iris Transponder) - March 2020 (BioSentinnel, Near-Earth Asteroid Scout, EQUULEUS, Lunar Flashlight, Lunar Polar Hydrogen Mapper, & Δ-Differential One-Way Range) Available in the AESS Resource Center https://resourcecenter.aess.ieee.org/ ▸Free for AESS members ▸ What are CubeSats? A class of small research spacecraft Built to standard dimensions (Units or “U”) ▸ - 1U = 10 cm x 10 cm x 11 cm (Roughly “cube-shaped”) ▸ - Modular: 1U, 2U, 3U, 6U or 12U in size - Weigh less than 1.33 kg per U NASA's CubeSats are dispensed from a deployer such as a Poly-Picosatellite Orbital Deployer (P-POD) ▸NASA’s CubeSat Launch initiative (CSLI) provides opportunities for small satellite payloads to fly on rockets ▸planned for upcoming launches. These CubeSats are flown as secondary payloads on previously planned missions. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/home/CubeSats_initiative What is CuSP? NASA Science Mission Directorate sponsored Heliospheric Science Mission selected in June 2015 to be launched on Artemis I. ▸ https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/heliophys ics-cubesat-to-launch-on-nasa-s-sls Support space weather research by determining proton radiation levels during solar energetic particle events and identifying suprathermal properties that could help ▸ predict geomagnetic storms.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Flashlight & NEA Scout
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lunar Flashlight & NEA Scout A NanoSat Architecture for Deep Space Exploration Payam Banazadeh (JPL/Caltech) Andreas Frick (JPL/Caltech) EM-1 Secondary Payload Selection • 19 NASA center-led concepts were evaluated and 3 were down-selected for further refinement by AES toward a Mission Concept Review (MCR) planned for August 2014 • Primary selection criteria: - Relevance to Space Exploration Strategic Knowledge Gaps (SKGs) - Life cycle cost - Synergistic use of previously demonstrated technologies - Optimal use of available civil servant workforce Payload Strategic Knowledge Gaps Mission Concept NASA Centers Addressed BioSentinel Human health/performance in high- Study radiation-induced DNA ARC/JSC radiation space environments damage of live organisms in cis- • Fundamental effects on biological systems lunar space; correlate with of ionizing radiation in space environments measurements on ISS and Earth Lunar Flashlight Lunar resource potential Locate ice deposits in the Moon’s JPL/MSFC/MHS • Quantity and distribution of water and other permanently shadowed craters volatiles in lunar cold traps Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) NEA Characterization Slow flyby/rendezvous and Scout • NEA size, rotation state (rate/pole position) characterize one NEA in a way MSFC/JPL How to work on and interact with NEA that is relevant to human surface exploration • NEA surface mechanical properties 2 EM-1: Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) Scout concept WHY NEA Scout? – Characterize a NEA with an imager to address key Strategic
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Sail Propulsion for Deep Space Exploration
    Solar Sail Propulsion for Deep Space Exploration Les Johnson NASA George C. Marshall Space Flight Center NASA Image We tend to think of space as being big and empty… NASA Image Space Is NOT Empty. We can use the environments of space to our advantage NASA Image Solar Sails Derive Propulsion By Reflecting Photons Solar sails use photon “pressure” or force on thin, lightweight, reflective sheets to produce thrust. 4 NASA Image Real Solar Sails Are Not “Ideal” Billowed Quadrant Diffuse Reflection 4 Thrust Vector Components 4 Solar Sail Trajectory Control Solar Radiation Pressure allows inward or outward Spiral Original orbit Sail Force Force Sail Shrinking orbit Expanding orbit Solar Sails Experience VERY Small Forces NASA Image 8 Solar Sail Missions Flown Image courtesy of Univ. Surrey NASA Image Image courtesy of JAXA Image courtesy of The Planetary Society NanoSail-D (2010) IKAROS (2010) LightSail-1 & 2 CanX-7 (2016) InflateSail (2017) NASA JAXA (2015/2019) Canada EU/Univ. of Surrey The Planetary Society Earth Orbit Interplanetary Earth Orbit Earth Orbit Deployment Only Full Flight Earth Orbit Deployment Only Deployment Only Deployment / Flight 3U CubeSat 315 kg Smallsat 3U CubeSat 3U CubeSat 10 m2 196 m2 3U CubeSat <10 m2 10 m2 32 m2 9 Planned Solar Sail Missions NASA Image NASA Image NASA Image Near Earth Asteroid Scout Advanced Composite Solar Solar Cruiser (2025) NASA (2021) NASA Sail System (TBD) NASA Interplanetary Interplanetary Earth Orbit Full Flight Full Flight Full Flight 100 kg spacecraft 6U CubeSat 12U CubeSat 1653 m2 86
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Life Sciences Payload Assessment
    Lunar Surface Science Workshop 2020 (LPI Contrib. No. 2241) 5077.pdf LUNAR LIFE SCIENCES PAYLOAD ASSESSMENT. S. C. Sun1, F. Karouia2, M. P. Lera3, M. P. Parra1, H. E. Ray4, A. J. Ricco1, S. M. Spremo1. 1NASA Ames Research Center, 2Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, 3KBR, 4ASRC Federal Space and Defense, Inc. Introduction: The Moon provides a unique site to ISS, including systems that integrate into EXPRESS study living organisms. The fractional gravity and (EXpedite the PRocessing of ExperimentS for Space) unique radiation environment have similarities to Mars Racks or are external space exposure research facilities. and will help us understand how life will respond to These same systems can be the basis for future payload conditions on the red planet. Martian and lunar envi- systems for experiments to be performed beyond Low ronments can be simulated on the ground but not to high Earth Orbit. Such facilities would need to be adapted to fidelity. Altered gravity and increased radiation are dif- be compatible with the new research platforms and ficult to replicate simultaneously, which makes study- function in the harsher radiation environment found out- ing their combined effect difficult. The International side the magnetosphere. If Gateway and a lunar based- Space Station, and previously, the Space Shuttle, pro- lab could provide EXPRESS-compatible interfaces, lev- vided a microgravity environment, and could simulate eraging hardware developed for ISS would be more fea- fractional-g only via an onboard centrifuge. Because sible. the ISS and Space Shuttle orbits were within the Earth’s Gaps in Capabilities: Many of the payload systems magnetosphere, experiments on those platforms have that have been developed require human tending.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Technologies for Biological Experiments in Deep Space
    Developing technologies for biological experiments in deep space Sergio R. Santa Maria Elizabeth Hawkins Ada Kanapskyte NASA Ames Research Center [email protected] NASA’s life science programs STS-1 (1981) STS-135 (2011) 1973 – 1974 1981 - 2011 2000 – 2006 – Space Shuttle International Skylab Bio CubeSats Program Space Station Microgravity effects - Nausea / vomit - Disorientation & sleep loss - Body fluid redistribution - Muscle & bone loss - Cardiovascular deconditioning - Increase pathogenicity in microbes Interplanetary space radiation What type of radiation are we going to encounter beyond low Earth orbit (LEO)? Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs): - Interplanetary, continuous, modulated by the 11-year solar cycle - High-energy protons and highly charged, energetic heavy particles (Fe-56, C-12) - Not effectively shielded; can break up into lighter, more penetrating pieces Challenges: biology effects poorly understood (but most hazardous) Interplanetary space radiation Solar Particle Events (SPEs) - Interplanetary, sporadic, transient (several min to days) - High proton fluxes (low and medium energy) - Largest doses occur during maximum solar activity Challenges: unpredictable; large doses in a short time Space radiation effects Space radiation is the # 1 risk to astronaut health on extended space exploration missions beyond the Earth’s magnetosphere • Immune system suppression, learning and memory impairment have been observed in animal models exposed to mission-relevant doses (Kennedy et al. 2011; Britten et al. 2012) • Low doses of space radiation are causative of an increased incidence and early appearance of cataracts in astronauts (Cuccinota et al. 2001) • Cardiovascular disease mortality rate among Apollo lunar astronauts is 4-5-fold higher than in non-flight and LEO astronauts (Delp et al.
    [Show full text]
  • KPLO, ISECG, Et Al…
    NationalNational Aeronautics Aeronautics and Space and Administration Space Administration KPLO, ISECG, et al… Ben Bussey Chief Exploration Scientist Human Exploration & Operations Mission Directorate, NASA HQ 1 Strategic Knowledge Gaps • SKGs define information that is useful/mandatory for designing human spaceflight architecture • Perception is that SKGs HAVE to be closed before we can go to a destination, i.e. they represent Requirements • In reality, there is very little information that is a MUST HAVE before we go somewhere with humans. What SKGs do is buy down risk, allowing you to design simpler/cheaper systems. • There are three flavors of SKGs 1. Have to have – Requirements 2. Buys down risk – LM foot pads 3. Mission enhancing – Resources • Four sets of SKGs – Moon, Phobos & Deimos, Mars, NEOs www.nasa.gov/exploration/library/skg.html 2 EM-1 Secondary Payloads 13 CUBESATS SELECTED TO FLY ON INTERIM EM-1 CRYOGENIC PROPULSION • Lunar Flashlight STAGE • Near Earth Asteroid Scout • Bio Sentinel • LunaH-MAP • CuSPP • Lunar IceCube • LunIR • EQUULEUS (JAXA) • OMOTENASHI (JAXA) • ArgoMoon (ESA) • STMD Centennial Challenge Winners 3 3 3 Lunar Flashlight Overview Looking for surface ice deposits and identifying favorable locations for in-situ utilization in lunar south pole cold traps Measurement Approach: • Lasers in 4 different near-IR bands illuminate the lunar surface with a 3° beam (1 km spot). Orbit: • Light reflected off the lunar • Elliptical: 20-9,000 km surface enters the spectrometer to • Orbit Period: 12 hrs distinguish water
    [Show full text]
  • Payload Design for the Lunar Flashlight Mission
    Lunar and Planetary Science XLVIII (2017) 1709.pdf Payload Design For The Lunar Flashlight Mission. B. A. Cohen1, P. O. Hayne2, B. T. Greenhagen3, D. A. Paige4, J. M. Camacho2, K. Crabtree5, C. Paine2, R. G. Sellar5; 1NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville AL 35812 ([email protected]), 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena CA 91109, 3Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel MD 20723, 4UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, 5 Photon Engineering, Tucson AZ 85711. Introduction: Recent reflectance data from LRO lengths in rapid sequence, while a receiver system de- instruments suggest water ice and other volatiles may tects the reflected light. Derived reflectance and water be present on the surface in lunar permanently- ice band depths will be mapped onto the lunar surface shadowed regions, though the detection is not yet de- in order to identify locations where H2O ice is present finitive [1-3]. Understanding the composition, quanti- at or above 0.5 wt% concentration. ty, distribution, and form of water and other volatiles In the past year, we have advanced the design for associated with lunar permanently shadowed regions the Lunar Flashlight payload to meet our measurement (PSRs) is identified as a Strategic Knowledge Gap requirement within the limited mass and power availa- (SKG) for NASA’s human exploration program. These ble for the instrument system. We optimized the laser polar volatile deposits are also scientifically interest- wavelengths for maximum sensitivity to water ice ab- ing, having potential to reveal important information sorption bands. The selected wavelengths are 1.064 (- about the delivery of water to the Earth-Moon system.
    [Show full text]
  • AES-Secondaries-FS-V508b.Pdf
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Hitchhiking Into the Solar System: Launching NASA’s First Deep-Space CubeSats Introduction NASA is pioneering space through common capability and technology developments, enabling exploration and human STRATEGIC expansion across multiple solar system destinations, including to KNOWLEDGE GAPS an asteroid and Mars. This journey into deep space has begun with exploration systems testing and demonstrations on Earth and in space. Although uncrewed, the first flight of the Orion spacecraft in December 2014 was an initial step in demonstrating its ability to safely ferry astronauts beyond Earth into deep space. Strategic Knowledge Gaps, or SKGs, The next critical demonstration of NASA’s deep space exploration represent gaps in knowledge or capabilities will be on Exploration Mission (EM)-1 in 2018. This information required to reduce risk, first flight of NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket will increase effectiveness and improve launch an uncrewed Orion spacecraft to a stable orbit beyond the facts the design of robotic and human moon and return it to Earth. In addition to demonstrating NASA’s space exploration missions. NASA new heavy-lift capability, SLS has the capacity to accommodate uses SKGs to help inform research 11 6U-sized CubeSats, which will deploy once Orion spacecraft and investment strategies, and separation is confirmed and on a specified timeline based on their prioritize technology development for mission objectives. human and robotic exploration. NASA’s Advanced Exploration Systems Division has selected three secondary payloads for further development to launch on SLS — hitchhiking into deep space. The major driver for selection of these CubeSats was the risk reduction they enable by addressing key Strategic Knowledge Gaps (SKGs).
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar and Lagrangian Point L1/L2 Cubesat Communication and Navigation Considerations
    SSC17-V-02 Lunar and Lagrangian Point L1/L2 CubeSat Communication and Navigation Considerations Scott Schaire, Yen F Wong, Serhat Altunc, George Bussey, Marta Shelton, Dave Folta, Cheryl Gramling NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 (757) 824-1120, [email protected] Peter Celeste, Mike Anderson, Trish Perrotto Booz Allen Hamilton, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701 Ben Malphrus, Jeff Kruth Morehead State University, Morehead, KY 40351 ABSTRACT CubeSats have grown in sophistication to the point that relatively low-cost mission solutions could be undertaken for planetary exploration. There are unique considerations for lunar and L1/L2 CubeSat communication and navigation compared with low earth orbit CubeSats. This paper explores those considerations as they relate to the Lunar IceCube Mission. The Lunar IceCube is a CubeSat mission led by Morehead State University with participation from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the Busek Company and Vermont Tech. It will search for surface water ice and other resources from a high inclination lunar orbit. Lunar IceCube is one of a select group of CubeSats designed to explore beyond low-earth orbit that will fly on NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) as secondary payloads for Exploration Mission (EM) 1. Lunar IceCube and the EM-1 CubeSats will lay the groundwork for future lunar and L1/L2 CubeSat missions. This paper discusses communication and navigation needs for the Lunar IceCube mission and navigation and radiation tolerance requirements related to lunar and L1/L2 orbits. Potential CubeSat radios and antennas for such missions are investigated and compared. Ground station coverage, link analysis, and ground station solutions are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lunar Icecube Mission Design: Construction of Feasible Transfer Trajectories with a Constrained Departure
    AAS 16-285 THE LUNAR ICECUBE MISSION DESIGN: CONSTRUCTION OF FEASIBLE TRANSFER TRAJECTORIES WITH A CONSTRAINED DEPARTURE David C. Folta*, Natasha Bosanac†, Andrew Cox‡, and Kathleen C. Howell§ Lunar IceCube, a 6U CubeSat, will prospect for water and other volatiles from a low-periapsis, highly inclined elliptical lunar orbit. Injected from Exploration Mission-1, a lunar gravity assisted multi-body transfer trajectory will capture into a lunar science orbit. The constrained departure asymptote and value of trans-lunar energy limit transfer trajectory types that re-encounter the Moon with the necessary energy and flight duration. Purdue University and Goddard Space Flight Center’s Adaptive Trajectory Design tool and dynamical system research is applied to uncover cislunar spatial regions permitting viable transfer arcs. Numerically integrated transfer designs applying low-thrust and a design framework are described. INTRODUCTION With the increasing miniaturization of spacecraft technologies and availability of rides for secondary payloads onboard larger spacecraft supporting various missions, small spacecraft such as CubeSats offer a significantly reduced cost and development time over conventional, larger spacecraft. These benefits enable public and private entities, as well as educational institutions, to actively participate in space exploration. In fact, twelve CubeSats are intended to be launched onboard the second stage of the upcoming Exploration Mission-1 vehicle (EM-1)1. Following deployment, each secondary payload is injected into a translunar trajectory and must navigate to various destinations by leveraging the natural dynamics and any onboard propulsion. These missions will achieve various scientific and technology demonstration objectives, such as testing solar sail technology, investigating near-Earth asteroids, surveying the Moon for water ice, and measuring the effects of deep-space radiation on living organisms2.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosentinel: ! DNA Damage-And-Repair Experiment ! Beyond Low Earth Orbit!
    BioSentinel: ! DNA Damage-and-Repair Experiment ! Beyond Low Earth Orbit! Tony Ricco! Chief Technologist, Small Payloads! NASA Ames Research Center! BioSentinel! Mission Goals and Objectives • Demonstrate simple model organisms as “biosentinels” o Biologically based sensors for hazards to humans Particularly for radiation, beyond low Earth orbit (LEO) Compare/correlate to physical radiation measurements st o DNA damage: 1 space demo. of biosentinel concept o Validate radiation damage models for biology o Develop “transfer standards” from biosentinels to humans o Support development of radiation protection o Inform mitigation strategies, actions • Conduct life science studies in multiple space environments relevant to human exploration o Deconvolute effects on biological systems 2" BioSentinel! Implementation • 6U autonomous nanosatellite ADCS*" o 4U payload, including radiation sensors Biosen)nel" o ≥ 2U for bus + ADCS including µ-propulsion P/L*" o ~ 14 kg total mass Bus" o ~ 23 W average power (deployable solar panels) o Mission duration: 18 months • Identical BioSentinel payload developed for ISS o similar µ-gravity but LEO radiation environment • Identical P/L for delayed-sync. ground control o 1 xg; low radiation • Radiation exposure ground studies (e.g. BNL) o 1 xg; acute, defined radiation doses BioSen2nel!spacecra?! design!concept! *ADCS!=!a)tude!determina2on4and4control!system;!P/L!=!payload! 3" BioSentinel! Launch Orbit • Launched as a secondary payload on EM-1 – Exploration Mission 1: 1st flight of NASA’s Space Launch System
    [Show full text]