DOCSLIB.ORG

Bariatric Surgery and Procedures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bariatric Surgery and Procedures Medical Coverage Policy Effective Date ............................................12/15/2020 Next Review Date ....................................... 7/15/2021 Coverage Policy Number .................................. 0051 Bariatric Surgery and Procedures Table of Contents Related Coverage Resources Overview ................................................................... 2 Gastric Pacing/Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES) Coverage Policy ....................................................... 2 Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment Services Adults ..................................................................... 2 Panniculectomy and Abdominoplasty Bariatric Surgery Procedures (Adults) ................ 3 Sleep Testing Services Reoperation and Revisional Bariatric Surgery Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) (Adults) ............................................................... 4 Adolescents ............................................................ 5 Bariatric Surgery Procedures (Adolescents) ...... 5 Reoperation and Revisional Bariatric Surgery (Adolescents) ...................................................... 6 Adults and Adolescents.......................................... 6 Bariatric Surgery for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus ............................................................... 6 Cholecystectomy, Liver Biopsy, Herniorrhaphy, Prophylactic Vena Cava Filter Placement, or Upper Endoscopy ............................................... 6 General Background ............................................... 7 Bariatric Surgery Procedures ........................... 13 Other Bariatric Surgical Procedures ................. 18 Reoperation/Revisional Bariatric Surgery ........ 44 Bariatric Surgery for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) .................................................... 45 Cholecystectomy, Liver Biopsy, Herniorrhaphy, Prophylactic Vena Cava Filter Placement, or Upper Endoscopy ............................................. 50 Medicare Coverage Determinations .................... 57 Coding/Billing Information.................................... 57 References ............................................................. 62 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE The following Coverage Policy applies to health benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Certain Cigna Companies and/or lines of business only provide utilization review services to clients and do not make coverage determinations. References to standard benefit plan language and coverage determinations do not apply to those clients. Coverage Policies are intended to provide guidance in interpreting certain standard benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Please note, the terms of a customer’s particular benefit plan document [Group Service Agreement, Evidence of Coverage, Certificate of Coverage, Summary Plan Description (SPD) or similar plan document] may differ significantly from the standard benefit plans upon which these Coverage Policies are based. For example, a customer’s benefit plan document may contain a specific exclusion related to a topic addressed in a Coverage Policy. In the event of a conflict, a customer’s benefit plan document always supersedes the information in the Coverage Policies. In the absence of a controlling federal or state coverage mandate, benefits are ultimately determined by the terms of the applicable benefit plan document. Coverage determinations in each specific instance require consideration of 1) the terms of the applicable benefit plan document in effect on the date of service; 2) any applicable laws/regulations; 3) any relevant collateral source materials including Coverage Policies and; 4) the specific facts of the particular situation. Coverage Policies relate exclusively to the administration of health benefit plans. Coverage Policies are not recommendations for Page 1 of 84 Medical Coverage Policy: 0051 treatment and should never be used as treatment guidelines. In certain markets, delegated vendor guidelines may be used to support medical necessity and other coverage determinations. Overview This Coverage Policy addresses bariatric surgery and procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity. Coverage Policy Coverage for bariatric surgery or revision of a bariatric surgery procedure varies across plans and may be governed by state mandates. Refer to the customer’s benefit plan document for coverage details. This coverage policy statement is organized as follows: 1) Criteria that applies to Adults only 2) Criteria that applies to Adolescents only 3) Criteria that applies to Adults and Adolescents Adults Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity in an adult (age ≥ 18 years) using a covered procedure outlined below is considered medically necessary when ALL of the following criteria are met: • EITHER of the following: BMI (Body Mass Index) ≥ 40 BMI (Body Mass Index) 35–39.9 with at least one clinically significant obesity-related comorbidity, including but not limited to the following: o mechanical arthropathy in a weight-bearing joint (symptomatic degenerative joint disease in a weight bearing joint) o diabetes mellitus o poorly controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure at least 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure 90 mm Hg or greater, despite optimal medical management) o hyperlipidemia o coronary artery disease o lower extremity lymphatic or venous obstruction o obstructive sleep apnea o pulmonary hypertension o evidence of fatty liver disease (i.e., nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [NAFLD] or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH]) • A statement from a physician/physician assistant/nurse practitioner/licensed mental health provider/registered dietician that the individual has failed previous attempts to achieve and maintain weight loss by medical management. • A thorough multidisciplinary evaluation within the previous six months which includes ALL of the following: a description of the proposed procedure(s) a recommendation for bariatric surgery from a physician/ physician assistant/nurse practitioner other than the requesting surgeon or associated staff unequivocal clearance for bariatric surgery by a mental health provider a nutritional evaluation by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner or registered dietician Page 2 of 84 Medical Coverage Policy: 0051 Bariatric Surgery Procedures (Adults) When the specific medical necessity criteria noted above for bariatric surgery for an adult have been met, ANY of the following open or laparoscopic bariatric surgery procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity is considered medically necessary: Procedure Open CPT® Codes Laparoscopic CPT® Codes Vertical band gastroplasty 43842 43659 Adjustable silicone gastric banding (e.g., LAP- 43843 43770 ® ™ BAND , REALIZE ) Sleeve gastrectomy as a stand-alone or 43843 43775 staged procedure Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 43846 43644 (roux limb less than 150 cm) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 43847 43645 (roux limb greater than 150 cm) Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal 43845 43659, 44799 Switch (BPD/DS) Billiopancreatic Diversion (BPD) without DS 43633 43659 Adjustment of a silicone gastric banding is considered medically necessary to control the rate of weight loss and/or treat symptoms secondary to gastric restriction following a medically necessary adjustable silicone gastric banding procedure. The following bariatric surgery procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity, when performed alone or in conjunction with another bariatric surgery procedure are considered experimental, investigational or unproven: Procedure CPT® Code(s) Band over bypass 43770, 43843, 43999 Band over sleeve 43770, 43843, 43999 Fobi-Pouch (limiting proximal gastric pouch) 43659, 43843, 43999 Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) or gastric pacing 64590 and 43881 OR 64590 and 43647 Gastroplasty (stomach stapling) 43659, 43843 Intestinal bypass (jejunoileal bypass) 44238, 44799 Intragastric balloon (e.g., Orbera™, ReShape™, Obalon) 43999 Laparoscopic greater curvature plication 43659 Loop gastric bypass 43659, 43843 Mini-gastric bypass 43659, 43843 Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery 43289, 43499 (NOTES)/endoscopic oral-assisted bariatric surgery procedures, including but not limited to the following: restorative obesity surgery, endoluminal (ROSE) StomaphyX™, duodenojejunal bypass liner (e.g., Endobarrier™) transoral gastroplasty (e.g., TOGA®) endoscopic closure devices (e.g., Apollo OverStitch™) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass combined with simultaneous 43644 or 43645 and 43770 gastric banding OR Page 3 of 84 Medical Coverage Policy: 0051 43846 or 43847 and 43843 or 43999 Single-anastomosis duodenal switch (DS) 43659, 43999, 44799 ® Stomach aspiration therapy (e.g., AspireAssist ) 43659, 43999 ® Vagus nerve blocking (e.g., Maestro ) 0312T, 0313T, 0316T, 0317T Vagus nerve stimulation 61885 and 64568 OR 61885 and 64553 Reoperation and Revisional Bariatric Surgery (Adults) Replacement of an adjustable silicone gastric band or separate or concurrent band removal and conversion to a second bariatric surgical procedure is considered medically necessary if there is evidence of band slippage or band component malfunction and the faulty component cannot be repaired. Gastric band removal is considered medically necessary for gastrointestinal symptomology (e.g., persistent nausea and/or vomiting, gastroesophageal reflux) with or without imaging evidence of obstruction. The following procedures are considered medically necessary when the individual develops a major complication from a primary bariatric surgery
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Duodenal Switch. a Switch to the Duodenal Switch. A
    Bariátrica & Metabólica Ibero-Americana (2019) 9.2.4: 2554-2563 Duodenal switch. A switch to the duodenal switch. A. Baltasar, N. Pérez, R. Bou, C. Serra Hospital "Virgen De Los Lirios De Alcoy”, Clínica San Jorge [email protected] 616.231.021 ABSTRACT: Background: The duodenal Switch (DS) combines a Sleeve-forming Keywords: gastrectomy (SFG) and a bilio-pancreatic diversion (BPD). Objectives: To report on 950 DS patients treated from 1994 to 2011. • Duodenal junction • Bariatric surgery Environment: Regional teaching hospital and private institution. • Vertical gastrectomy Methods: Prospective study of 950 consecutive patients treated with CD. • Bilio-pancreatic diversion • Poliphenols. Results: There were 518 open DS (ODS) and 432 laparoscopic DS (LDS). Surgical mortality of 0.73% (1.6% in CDA and 0.47% in CDL), 4.84% incidence of leakage, two liver failure (0.2%) and protein calorie malnutrition (PCM) in 3.1%. At 5 years, the %EWL drops by 80% and the Expected BMI by 100%. Conclusions: The CD is the most aggressive bariatric technique, with the best long-term weight loss. Operative complications and long-term follow-up guidelines are described. The aim is to change the bariatric techniques to accept the CD. 2555 Bariátrica & Metabólica Ibero-Americana (2019) 9.2.4: 2554-2563 Introduction Description of surgical techniques The Duodenal Switch (DS) is a mixed operation that consists Open DS (ODS) by transverse laparotomy of two techniques, a gastric surgery, the Sleeve-forming The patient is in Trendelenburg position. A transverse Vertical Gastrectomy (SFG) to reduce intake and also an supraumbilical incision is made between both costal intestinal surgery, the bilio-pancreatic diversion (BPD) that margins (Fig.2 a-b).
    [Show full text]
  • Gastric Bypass Surgeries in New Hampshire, 1996-2007
    CDC - Preventing Chronic Disease: Volume 9, 2012: 11_0089 Page 1 of 6 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Gastric Bypass Surgeries in New Hampshire, 1996-2007 Sai S. Cherala, MD, MPH Suggested citation for this article: Cherala SS. Gastric bypass surgeries in New Hampshire, 1996-2007. Prev Chronic Dis 2012;9:110089. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110089 . PEER REVIEWED Abstract Introduction Obesity is a national epidemic. Gastric bypass surgery may be the only option that provides significant long-term weight loss for people who are morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m2 ) or for people who have a BMI of 35 or higher and have an obesity-related comorbidity. The objective of this study was to assess trends in gastric bypass surgery in New Hampshire. Methods Data from 1996 to 2007 from the New Hampshire Inpatient Hospital Discharge data set were analyzed. Records for patients with a gastric bypass surgery code were identified, and data on patients and hospitalizations were collected. A joinpoint regression model was used to analyze trends in surgery rates. Differences between patients and payer types were analyzed by using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel χ2 test. Results The annual rate of gastric bypass surgery increased significantly from 3.3 to 22.4 per 100,000 adults between 1996 and 2007. The in-hospital death rate decreased significantly from 11% in 1996 to 1% in 2007. A greater proportion of women (78.1% during the study period) than men had this surgery. The average charge of a surgery decreased significantly from $44,484 in 1996 to $43,907 in 2007; by 2007, total annual charges were $13.9 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Laparoscopic Truncal Vagotomy and Gatrojejunostomy for Pyloric Stenosis
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE pISSN 2234-778X •eISSN 2234-5248 J Minim Invasive Surg 2015;18(2):48-52 Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery Laparoscopic Truncal Vagotomy and Gatrojejunostomy for Pyloric Stenosis Jung-Wook Suh, M.D.1, Ye Seob Jee, M.D., Ph.D.1,2 Department of Surgery, 1Dankook University Hospital, 2Dankook University School of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea Purpose: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) remains one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal diseases and Received January 27, 2015 an important target for surgical treatment. Laparoscopy applies to most surgical procedures; however Revised 1st March 9, 2015 its use in elective peptic ulcer surgery, particularly in cases of pyloric stenosis, has not been popular. 2nd March 28, 2015 The aim of this study was to describe the role of laparoscopic surgery and an easily performed Accepted April 20, 2015 procedure for pyloric stenosis. We accordingly performed laparoscopic truncal vagotomy with gastrojejunostomy in 10 consecutive patients with pyloric stenosis. Corresponding author Ye Seob Jee Methods: Data were collected prospectively from all patients who underwent laparoscopic truncal Department of Surgery, Dankook vagotomy with gastrojejunostomy from August 2009 to May 2014 and reviewed retrospectively. University Hospital, Dankook Results: A total of 10 patients underwent laparoscopic trucal vagotomy with gastrojejunostomy for University School of Medicine, 119, peptic ulcer obstruction from August 2009 to May 2014 in ○○ university hospital. The mean age was Dandae-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 62.6 (±16.4) years old and mean BMI was 19.3 (±2.5) kg/m2. There were no conversions to open 330-714, Korea surgery and no occurrence of intra-operative complications.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines Before & After Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass
    University of Missouri Health System Missouri Bariatric Services Guidelines Before & After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Table of Contents Topic Page Risks & Benefits of Weight Loss Surgery 3 Guidelines for Your Hospital Stay, Self-Care, & Medications 8 Day of Surgery Expectations 8 What to Expect During Your Hospital Stay 9 Taking Care of Yourself at Home 10 Nutrition Guidelines Before & After Weight Loss Surgery 14 Basic Nutrition Information all Patients Should Know 15 Guidelines for Success after Surgery 34 How to Prepare for Surgery 34 Portions after Weight Loss Surgery 35 Postoperative Dietary Goals 40 Diet Progression 42 Digestive Difficulties after Surgery 49 Understanding Vitamins & Minerals after Surgery 52 Tips for Dining out after Weight Loss Surgery 53 Food Record 55 Frequently Asked Questions 56 Weight Loss Surgery Patient Resources 57 Exercise Guidelines Before & After Weight Loss Surgery 58 Warm Up & Cool Down Stretches 63 Home Strength Training Program 66 Stretch Band Exercises 68 Psychological Considerations after Weight Loss Surgery 71 My Personal Relapse Plan 74 Problem Solving 75 Daily Food Record 76 Guidelines For Preconception & Prenatal Care after Surgery 77 2 | P a g e Risk and Benefits of Weight Loss Surgery All surgery, no matter how minor, carries some risk. Weight loss surgery is major surgery; you are put to sleep with a general anesthetic, carbon dioxide is blown into your abdominal cavity, and we work around the major organs and operate on the stomach and intestines (this area of the body is known as the gastrointestinal tract). National statistics report there is a one to two percent risk of dying after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoracoscopic Truncal Vagotomy Versus Surgical Revision of the Gastrojejunal Anastomosis for Recalcitrant Marginal Ulcers
    Surgical Endoscopy (2019) 33:607–611 and Other Interventional Techniques https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6386-7 2018 SAGES ORAL DYNAMIC Thoracoscopic truncal vagotomy versus surgical revision of the gastrojejunal anastomosis for recalcitrant marginal ulcers Alicia Bonanno1 · Brandon Tieu2 · Elizabeth Dewey1 · Farah Husain3 Received: 1 May 2018 / Accepted: 10 August 2018 / Published online: 21 August 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Introduction Marginal ulcer is a common complication following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with incidence rates between 1 and 16%. Most marginal ulcers resolve with medical management and lifestyle changes, but in the rare case of a non-healing marginal ulcer there are few treatment options. Revision of the gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis carries significant morbidity with complication rates ranging from 10 to 50%. Thoracoscopic truncal vagotomy (TTV) may be a safer alternative with decreased operative times. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of TTV in comparison to GJ revision for treatment of recalcitrant marginal ulcers. Methods A retrospective chart review of patients who required surgical intervention for non-healing marginal ulcers was performed from 1 September 2012 to 1 September 2017. All underwent medical therapy along with lifestyle changes prior to intervention and had preoperative EGD that demonstrated a recalcitrant marginal ulcer. Revision of the GJ anastomosis or TTV was performed. Data collected included operative time, ulcer recurrence, morbidity rate, and mortality rate. Results Twenty patients were identified who underwent either GJ revision (n = 13) or TTV (n = 7). There were no 30-day mortalities in either group.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Surgery to Remove Fat Has Long Been a Quest Of
    I have these deposits offat where I really hate them, especially on my thighs. Dieting hasn't helped. -Ginny, 34, secretary sing surgery to remove fat has long been a quest of Ucosmetic surgeons, but the journey toward that dream has been slow until recently. About twenty years ago, physicians in Italy scraped out fat through a relatively small incision using a sharp, circular-ended knife called a curette. Because severe complications often resulted, this technique did not gain widespread acceptance. Seizing on that idea, doctors in France began using a blunt-ended canula, a metal tube with openings along the sides that looks a bit like an oversized straw, to remove fat more gently while preserving the important connections between the skin and muscle. This fat-removal method minimized the chances of damage to surrounding tissue. In a variation on the technique, doctors began infusing into the fat small amounts of saline (salt water), which was identical in composition to the water in our body. This helped break up the fat globules, making them easier to remove. © Copyright 2000, David J. Leffell. MD. All rights reserved. 172 Look Your Best After the technique was introduced to the United States in 1982, lipo­ suction rapidly gained popularity, though the potential for complications, many related mostly to the use of general anesthesia, remained. Three years later, American dermatologist Jeffrey Klein introduced tumescent anesthesia. The tumescent technique involves injecting low-concentration anesthetic solution (lidocaine) into the fat combined with epinephrine (to reduce bleeding and prolong the anesthetic effect) and saline. Large vol­ umes of this solution are injected into the fat before surgery, thus swelling the area to approximately two to three times its normal size.
    [Show full text]
  • Childhood Obesity During the 1960S Are Available for Certain Age Groups
    NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS SEPTEMBER Health E-Stats 2018 Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Severe Obesity Among Children and Adolescents Aged 2–19 Years: United States, 1963–1965 Through 2015–2016 by Cheryl D. Fryar, M.S.P.H., Margaret D. Carroll, M.S.P.H., and Cynthia L. Ogden, Ph.D., Division of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys Results from the 2015–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), using measured heights and weights, indicate that an estimated 18.5% of U.S. children and adolescents aged 2–19 years have obesity, including 5.6% with severe obesity, and another 16.6% are overweight. Body mass index (BMI), expressed as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2), is commonly used to classify obesity among adults and is also recommended for use with children and adolescents. Cutoff criteria are based on the sex-specific BMI-for-age 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States (available from: https://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/cdc_charts.htm). Based on current recommendations from expert committees, children and adolescents with BMI values at or above the 95th percentile of the growth charts are categorized as having obesity. This differs from previous years in which children and adolescents above this cutoff were categorized as overweight. This change in terminology reflects the category labels used by organizations such as the National Academy of Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics. For more information, see “Changes in Terminology for Childhood Overweight and Obesity,” available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr025.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Description
    OhioHealth Mansfield Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication is a surgical procedure intended to cure Esophagus gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Reflux disease is a disorder of the lower esophageal sphincter (the circular muscle at the base of the esophagus that serves as a barrier between the esophagus and stomach). When the LES malfunctions, acidic stomach contents are able to inappropriately reflux into the esophagus causing undesirable symptoms. The laparoscopic Nissen Esophageal Fundoplication involves wrapping a small portion of the stomach around the sphincter junction between the esophagus and stomach to augment the function of the Tightened LES. The operation effectively cures GERD with recurrence rates ranging from hiatus 5-10 percent over the life of the patient. Patients who experience a recurrence can be treated medically or undergo a redo laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication. The most common postoperative side effect of a laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication is gas bloating. A small percentage of patients (10-20 percent) will not be able to belch or vomit after surgery. Some patients may experience temporary difficult swallowing after surgery. Some patients may experience intermittent episodes of “dumping syndrome” due to Vagus nerve irritation or Top of stomach being excessive acid production in the stomach. wrapped around esophagus Patients are typically on a modified diet for a few weeks after surgery to allow time for healing of the surgical repair and recovery of the function of the esophagus and stomach. Top of stomach fully wrapped around esophagus and sutured Nissen fundoplication © OhioHealth Inc. 2018. All rights reserved. Laparoscopic. 05/18..
    [Show full text]
  • Adjustable Gastric Banding
    7 Review Article Page 1 of 7 Adjustable gastric banding Emre Gundogdu, Munevver Moran Department of Surgery, Medical School, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey Contributions: (I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: All authors; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: All authors; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: All authors; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Emre Gündoğdu, MD, FEBS. Assistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]. Abstract: Gastric banding is based on the principle of forming a small volume pouch near the stomach by wrapping the fundus with various synthetic grafts. The main purpose is to limit oral intake. Due to the fact that it is a reversible surgery, ease of application and early results, the adjustable gastric band (AGB) operation has become common practice for the last 20 years. Many studies have shown that the effectiveness of LAGB has comparable results with other procedures in providing weight loss. Early studies have shown that short term complications after LAGB are particularly low when compared to the other complicated procedures. Even compared to RYGB and LSG, short-term results of LAGB have been shown to be significantly superior. However, as long-term results began to emerge, such as failure in weight loss, increased weight regain and long-term complication rates, interest in the procedure disappeared. The rate of revisional operations after LAGB is rapidly increasing today and many surgeons prefer to convert it to another bariatric procedure, such as RYGB or LSG, for revision surgery in patients with band removed after LAGB.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Policy: Bariatric Surgery Reference Number: NH
    Clinical Policy: Bariatric Surgery Reference Number: NH. CP.MP.37 Coding Implications Effective Date: 06/09 Revision Log Last Review Date: 04/18 See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description There are two categories of bariatric surgery: restrictive procedures and malabsorptive procedures. Gastric restrictive procedures include procedures where a small pouch is created in the stomach to restrict the amount of food that can be eaten, resulting in weight loss. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are examples of restrictive procedures. Malabsorptive procedures bypass portions of the stomach and intestines causing incomplete digestion and absorption of food. Duodenal switch is an example of a malabsorptive procedure. Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), and biliopancreatic diversion with gastric reduction duodenal switch (BPD-GRDS) are examples of restrictive and malabsorptive procedures. LAGB devices are currently not FDA approved for adolescents less than 18 years, but an industry- sponsored prospective study is in progress, and numerous retrospective studies of adolescents have been published with favorable results. Policy/Criteria It is the policy of NH Healthy Families that the bariatric surgery procedures LAGB, LSG, and laparoscopic RYGB for adolescents and adults and laparoscopic BPD-DS/BPD-GRDS for adults are medically necessary when meeting the following criteria under section I through III: I. Participating providers that are MBSAQIP (Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program for the American College of Surgeons) accredited have demonstrated a commitment to excellence in ethics, quality and patient care.
    [Show full text]
  • A Matched Cohort Analysis of Single Anastomosis Loop Duodenal Switch Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass with 18-Month Follow-Up - Springer
    A matched cohort analysis of single anastomosis loop duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 18-month follow-up - Springer Search Submit Article Surgical Endoscopy pp 1-7 First online: 22 December 2015 A matched cohort analysis of single anastomosis loop duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 18-month follow-up Austin Cottam, Daniel Cottam , Walter Medlin, Christina Richards, Samuel Cottam, Hinali Zaveri, Amit Surve 10.1007/s00464-015-4707-7 Copyright information Abstract Background The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) has been considered the gold standard for many years. The loop duodenal switch (LDS) is a relatively new procedure that simplifies the complexity of the duodenal switch (BPDDS) by making it a single anastomosis procedure while at the same time giving it more intestinal absorption to reduce the rates of malnutrition associated with traditional BPDDS. This paper seeks to compare the 18-month weight loss outcomes and complications of the more standard GBP with the newer LDS in a single US center. Methods A retrospective matched cohort was analyzed on 108 patients who had either GBP (54 patients) or LDS (54 patients). Regression analysis was used to compare weight loss outcomes as measured by BMI and weight loss percentages. Complications gathered included bleeds, reoperations, diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopy (EGD), ulcers and chronic nausea. Results GBP and LDS have statistically similar weight loss at 18 months (39.6 vs 41 % weight loss, respectively). However, there were significantly more nausea complaints (26 vs 5), diagnostic endoscopies (EGD) (21 vs 3) and ulcers (6 vs 0) with the GBP than the LDS.
    [Show full text]
  • Biliopancreatic Diversion with a Duodenal Switch
    Obesity Surgeuy, 8, 267-282 Biliopancreatic Diversion with a Duodenal Switch Douglas S. Hess MD, FACS; Douglas W. Hess MD Wood County Hospital, Bowling Green, OH, USA Background: This paper evaluates biliopancreatic BPD without some of the associated problems. diversion combined with the duodenal switch, form- This operation is now used by us for all our ing a hybrid procedure which is a combination of bariatric patients, both in primary surgical proce- restriction and malabsorption. Methods: The evaluation is of the first 440 patients dures and reoperations. undergoing this procedure who had had no previous The difficulty of establishing an operation that bariatric surgery. The mean starting weight was has both long- and short-term success is well 183 kg, with 41% of our patients considered super known. Bariatric surgery is either restrictive or morbidly obese (BMI > 50). malabsorptive in nature, each with its own ad- Results: There was an average maximum weight loss of 80% excess weight by 24 months post- vantages, disadvantages and complications. While operation; this continued at a 70% level for 8 years. trying to find a procedure that would produce Major complications were found in almost 9% of the better long-term results and fewer failures, i.e. cases. There were two perioperative deaths, one regain of weight, we began to look at the from pulmonary embolism and one from acute Scopinaro BPD.l First of all we considered it pulmonary obstruction. There were 36 type II dia- betics, all of whom have discontinued medication only for reoperations on failed restrictive proce- following the surgery.
    [Show full text]