Biliopancreatic Diversion with a Duodenal Switch
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Obesity Surgeuy, 8, 267-282 Biliopancreatic Diversion with a Duodenal Switch Douglas S. Hess MD, FACS; Douglas W. Hess MD Wood County Hospital, Bowling Green, OH, USA Background: This paper evaluates biliopancreatic BPD without some of the associated problems. diversion combined with the duodenal switch, form- This operation is now used by us for all our ing a hybrid procedure which is a combination of bariatric patients, both in primary surgical proce- restriction and malabsorption. Methods: The evaluation is of the first 440 patients dures and reoperations. undergoing this procedure who had had no previous The difficulty of establishing an operation that bariatric surgery. The mean starting weight was has both long- and short-term success is well 183 kg, with 41% of our patients considered super known. Bariatric surgery is either restrictive or morbidly obese (BMI > 50). malabsorptive in nature, each with its own ad- Results: There was an average maximum weight loss of 80% excess weight by 24 months post- vantages, disadvantages and complications. While operation; this continued at a 70% level for 8 years. trying to find a procedure that would produce Major complications were found in almost 9% of the better long-term results and fewer failures, i.e. cases. There were two perioperative deaths, one regain of weight, we began to look at the from pulmonary embolism and one from acute Scopinaro BPD.l First of all we considered it pulmonary obstruction. There were 36 type II dia- betics, all of whom have discontinued medication only for reoperations on failed restrictive proce- following the surgery. Seventeen revisions were dures. Our first cases were reoperations with the performed to correct excess weight loss and low standard Scopinaro BPD and a few without a protein levels. There have been no marginal ulcers, distal gastrectomy. However, the dense adhesions no cases of dumping syndrome, no foreign material found in the upper gastric area of previously used, and the procedure is a pyloric saving proce- dure which is functionally reversible. stapled patients caused difficulty in placing the Conclusions: This operation has vastly improved anastomosis and we were troubled with marginal the lives of seriously obese patients with many co- ulcer formation. We considered a method to morbidities. All type II diabetics have essentially anastomose the ileum to the duodenum away been cured of their disease. The procedure was from the site of the previous surgery. While tolerated well and patients are quite satisfied. There was minimal regain of weight with this method. o searching the literature on the subject of duode- 1998 Lippincott-Raven Publishers. nogastric reflux, we found DeMeester’s article about the duodenal switch procedure* and Key words: Biliopancreatic bypass, duodenal switch adapted it to our use. procedure, malabsorption, morbid obesity, vertical The first patient to have a BPD with a duode- gastrectomy, pylorus preservation. nal switch procedure was a male patient who had had a transverse gastroplasty 9 years earlier, in 1979. He was 190 cm tall and at the time of his Introduction surgery in 1979 he had weighed 166 kg. That surgery eventually failed due to staple-line dis- In 1988, using a combination of Dr. Scopinaro’s ruption, and his weight had increased to 206 kg biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and Dr. DeMees- by the time of his reoperation in March, 1988. He ter’s duodenal switch procedures, we developed a also had developed chronic heart failure, short- hybrid operation which has the advantages of the ness of breath, and was no longer able to perform many daily activities. Presently, he is approxi- mately 9.5 years after the conversion to a duode- Correspondence to: Douglas S. Hess, MD, 640 South Winter- garden Rd., Bowling Green, Ohio 43402, USA. Tel: (+l) 419 nal switch with a BPD, weighs 125 kg, and is free 352 1452; Fax: (+l) 419 352 1244. from problems associated with his obesity. Due 0 1998 Lippincott-Raven Publishers Obesity Suqey, 8, 1998 267 Hess and Hess to the success of our reoperations, we decided to Rationale for Duodenal Switch use this procedure for our primary operation for both the morbidly and super morbidly obese Examining the experimental work on dogs of Dr. patients. DeMeester et aZ.’ as described in the Figure 1, it is Our first duodenal switch primary procedure evident that a small segment of proximal duode- was performed on a morbidly obese male patient num protects against marginal ulceration. The (BMI, 46) in May, 1988. At his most recent surgical procedures for all groups are basically the weighing on October 29 1997, his excess weight same, except that the dogs in groups C and D had loss was 88%, BMI was 26, and his percent of ideal a short segment of proximal duodenum left in weight (% IW) was 112. The first super morbidly place before the jejunostomy. The dogs in groups obese patient (BMI 58.7) was a female operated in A and B had a high incidence of ulcers, perfora- June, 1988. At her last weighing on June 10 1997, tion and weight loss. Groups C and D had her excess weight loss was 78%, BMI was 30, and signifcantly fewer ulcers and almost no perfora- her % IW 137. Both of these patients are more than tions; however, the weight loss did not change. 9 years post-operation and are doing well. This Using this data and DeMeester’s report of patient operation is now our procedure of choice for cases (i.e. duodenal switch) we believed that the surgical correction of morbid and super morbid combination of the BPD and the duodenal switch obesity. is a logical progression of this procedure. To This paper will be limited to our first 440 achieve the gastric restriction required by Scopi- patients and to primary procedures only. Reopera- naro’s BPD a vertical gastrectomy is performed; tions are not included. this removes a large portion of the fundus and Mann-Williamson Duodenal switch n=7 n=5 n=7 n= 10 Ulcer* 86% (6/7) 100% (5/5) 29% (2/7) 10% (1 /I 0) Perforation 43% (3/7) 60% (3/5) 14% (l/7) 0% (O/l 0) Weight loss 33% 7% 33% 5% Follow-up 3 months 3 months 3 months 1 year *AvsC P=O.O5 BvsD P=O.O02 AvsD P=O.O03 Figure 1. Results of four diversion procedures with their effect on ulcer incidence, perforation and weight loss (reproduced, with permission, from reference 2). 268 Obesity Surgery, 8, 1998 BPD with Duodenal Switch also reduces acid formation, thus helping to Table 1. Preoperative data: morbid obese patients prevent marginal ulceration (Figure 2). Average values (n=440) Patient Selection and Sex (M/F) 951345 Age (years) 40 Preoperative Evaluation Weight (kg) 136.3 Height (cm) 166.1 Patients selected for surgery in this cohort were Body mass index (kg/m2) 50 aged 16-62 years (average 39 years). All patients Percent ideal weight 222 Excess weight (kg) were 45.5 kg or more above their ideal weight 76 using the 1983 Metropolitan height and weight tables. The presence of co-morbidities is an addi- tional indication for surgery. Patients with combi- later seen by the physician for an extended inter- nations of co-morbidities with a lower excess view and second explanation of the procedure, weight are occasionally candidates for surgery. including expectations. They have the usual pre- However, most patients are more than twice their operative complete blood count, chemistry pro- ideal weight at the time of surgery (Table 1). files, cardiac evaluation, and X-rays. They are then All patients view a video explaining the surgical seen by an internist for a medical evaluation. The procedure and possible complications. They are patients are encouraged to attend one of the monthly support meetings before surgery, which is also attended by a physician. The meetings allow the prospective patients to acquire addi- tional information and talk to patients who have had this surgery. Procedure Under general and epidural anesthesia a midline incision is used in the upper abdomen from the xyphoid to the umbilicus. A Gomez retractor is put in place, and the abdomen is explored. We start with an appendectomy, and complete meas- urement of the small bowel along the antimesen- teric border with a mild stretch between two Babcock clamps, from the cecum to the ligament of Treitz. A silk suture is placed in the margin of the bowel at the estimated proximal common channel and the proximal end of the alimentary limb. These measurements may be changed after complete measurement of the bowel. The length of the alimentary limb is calculated by multiplying the bowel length by 40% to determine the distance from the cecum to the ligament of Treitz. Using 25 cm increments, the final length of the alimen- tary canal is the nearest to the 40% area. Gener- ally, the alimentary canal will be 250 cm, 275 cm or 300 cm. Occasionally 225 cm or 325 cm will be used in patients with an unusually short or long small bowel. Since the epidural anesthesia may cause spasm of the small bowel, it is not used until after the measurements are completed. Figure 2. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch The position of the table is changed to reverse procedure. Trendelenberg as our attention is focused on the Obesity Surgery, 8, 1998 269 Hess ad Hess upper abdomen. The left triangler and Falciform and is anastomosed to this duodenum with a ligaments of the liver are incised to allow retrac- Valtrac anastomosing ring end-to-end using a tion of the liver away from the stomach and it is 1.5 mm gap and a 25 mm diameter Valtrac.