DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2105.07866V2 [Hep-Ph] 31 May 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2105.07866V2 [Hep-Ph] 31 May 2021 FERMILAB-FN-1129-T Notes on Lepton Gyromagnetic Ratios Chris Quigg∗ Theoretical Physics Department, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510 USA (Dated: June 2, 2021) A compendium for outsiders. I. ORIGINS relativity and the general transformation theory leads to an explanation of all duplexity phenomena without fur- Dirac's quantum theory of the electron tells us what ther assumption [4]. an electron is [1]: a particle that carries half a quan- tum (~=2) of spin angular momentum, −1 unit of elec- tric charge, and magnetic moment µe of minus one Bohr II. MAGNETIC MOMENT AS A DIAGNOSTIC magneton, −µB ≡ −~e=2me. Here ~ is the quantum of action, −e the electron charge, and me the electron mass. The Bohr magneton is defined as the magnitude A. Generalities of the magnetic dipole moment of a point electron orbit- ing an atom with one unit (~) of orbital angular momen- Within quantum electrodynamics (QED), a renormal- tum. [The numerical value is µB = 5:788 381 8060(17) × izable local relativistic quantum field theory of photons −11 −1 10 MeV T [2].] On the classical level, an orbiting and electrons, the gyromagnetic ratio of a lepton, g`, point particle with electric charge e and mass m exhibits emerges unambiguously from the perturbation expan- a magnetic dipole moment given by sion. An extensive and interesting literature explores what makes g` = 2 the \natural value" for a structure- e~ less point particle of spin- 1 [5]. The requirement of good ~µL = L:~ (1) 2 2m high-energy behavior implies that g` − 2 must vanish at Dirac's prediction for the electron magnetic moment is tree level for any well-behaved theory [6]. thus twice the value that would arise for a half unit of Quantum corrections induce a deviation from the Dirac orbital angular momentum, if that were possible. The moment that is traditionally expressed as the magnetic 1 moment anomaly, ratio ge ≡ µe=(− 2 µB) is called the gyromagnetic ratio of the electron; the Dirac equation predicts ge = 2. These properties are precisely what is required to ac- g` − 2 a` ≡ : (2) count for what Dirac calls \duplexity phenomena," the 2 observed number of quantum states for an electron in an atom being twice the number given by the quantum the- The predicted value of a` can be confronted by experi- 1 ment. The model dependence of the magnetic anomaly ory of a spinless point particle. A spin- 2 electron with a magnetic moment of one Bohr magneton matches pre- makes it an incisive test of QED and a sensitive probe cisely what Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit [3] inferred from for new-physics contributions [7]. The interplay between their study of atomic spectra. theory and experiment played a decisive role in the devel- Dirac writes, The question remains as to why Nature opment and validation of quantum electrodynamics [8]. should have chosen this particular model for the elec- Beyond its role in challenging QED and probing for tron instead of being satisfied with the point-charge. One the virtual influence of undiscovered particles and forces, arXiv:2105.07866v2 [hep-ph] 31 May 2021 would like to find some incompleteness in the previous the anomalous magnetic moment provides stringent con- methods of applying quantum mechanics to the point- straints on lepton substructure [9]. For that purpose, we charge electron such that, when removed, the whole of the may examine the magnetic anomaly defect, defined as the duplexity phenomena follow without arbitrary assump- difference between theoretical prediction and experimen- tions. In the present paper it is shown that this is the tal determination, case, the incompleteness of the previous theories lying th exp in their disagreement with relativity, or, alternatetively, δa` ≡ a` − a` : (3) with the general transformation theory of quantum me- chanics. It appears that the simplest Hamiltonian for a A very simple working hypothesis is that no cancellations point-charge electron satisfying the requirements of both or suppression factors due to symmetries in the underly- ing dynamics account for the small mass m` of the com- posite lepton itself. Alternatively, so-called chiral models provide more modest constraints. In either case, it is in- ∗ [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0002-2728-2445 ∗ formative to relate the compositeness scale M` and the 2 [4:µ] 2 2 radius R` of the lepton to the magnetic anomaly defect, so that ae ≈ 0:000 000 52 (α /π ). A form useful for evaluating fermion bubbles for all values of the mass ratio m` jδa`j = = m`R` no suppression, or (4a) is given in Ref. [15]. M ∗ ` Through heroic work over many decades, the calcula- 2 m` 2 2 tion of the electron's magnetic anomaly has been carried jδa`j = ∗ = m` R` chiral model. (4b) 3 M` out through five loops in QED. The three-loop O(α ) contribution is given in closed form in [16]; evaluated nu- Searches for quark and lepton compositeness in high- merically, it gives energy collisions, reviewed in §92 of Ref. [2], reach above 10 TeV, again assuming no dynamical conspiracies. α3 a[6] = (1:181 241 456 :::) : (10) e π B. The Electron Analytical calculations, reinforced by numerical evalua- tions, exist through four loops, i.e., up to O(α/π)4, or eighth order in the electron charge e. The coefficient of The electron was the focus of Dirac's theory and the (α/π)5 is known from numerical integrations. In addi- test case for the developing theory of quantum electro- tion, the contributions of weak and hadronic interactions dynamics in the late nineteen-forties. It is stable on have been estimated. The predicted value as of 2019 the time scale of any conceivable experiment; the cur- 28 is [17] rent bound on the electron lifetime, τe > 6:6 × 10 yr at 90% C.L. [10], greatly exceeds the age of the uni- th[Cs] −14 ae = 115 965 218 160:6(11)(12)(229) × 10 ; (11) verse. The electron mass is me = (0:510 998 946 1 ± 0:000 000 003 1) MeV. CPT invariance requires that the where the first two uncertainties are from the tenth- gyromagnetic ratios of electron and positron be identical: order QED term and the hadronic term, respectively. ge− = ge+ . The third and largest uncertainty comes from the value The anomalous magnetic moment of the electron was of the fine structure constant obtained from atom- discovered in 1947 by Kusch and Foley [11], who inferred interferometry measurements of the Cs atom, α−1(Cs) = 137:035 999 046(27) [18]. A more recent determination [KF] ae− = 0:001 19(5) (5) using matter-wave interferometry to measure the recoil velocity of a rubidium atom that absorbs a photon, leads from their study of hyperfine structure in gallium atoms. to α−1(Rb20) = 137:035 999 206(11) [19]. These two Julian Schwinger showed that the one-loop (O(e2)) quan- highly precise values differ by approximately 5:4 stan- tum correction to the electron's magnetic moment con- dard deviations [20]. tributes [12] To compare theory and experiment, it is efficient to combine the theoretical uncertainties of Eqn. (11), thus: [2] α ae = ≈ 0:001 162; (6) 2π th[Cs] −14 ae = 115 965 218 161(023) × 10 : (12) where the numerical value reflects the value of the fine- This represents a prediction at the level of 0.23 parts per structure constant as then known, α = 1=137. trillion (ppt) for g . Adopting instead the 2020 value of The two-loop contribution to the gyromagnetic ratio e α−1(Rb) [19], the standard-model prediction is of the electron is also known analytically [13]. It is th[Rb20] −14 α2 197 π2 3 π2 ae = 115 965 218 025:2(95) × 10 ; (13) a[4] = + + ζ(3) − ln 2 (7a) e π2 144 12 4 2 which carries an uncertainty of 0.1 ppt for ge and lies α2 [Cs] −1 = −0:328 ≈ −0:000 001 77: (7b) 5:5σ below ae . A smaller value of α , which is to say π a larger value of α, implies a larger calculated value of P1 −3 ae. The difference is very closely given by the Schwinger Here ζ(3) = i=1 i = 1:202 056 903 ::: is the Riemann zeta function of 3. The sum of Eqn. (6) and Eqn. (7) contribution, yields the theoretical prediction ca. 1957 (for a theory of α(Cs) − α(Rb20) photons and electrons only), ≈ 0:136(25) × 10−11; (14) 2π [2] [4] ae ≈ ae + ae = 0:001 159 6: (8) a shift to which modern measurements of ge are sensitive. An independent numerical evaluation of the O(e10) The contributions of heavier fermion (ff¯) bubbles are contribution of diagrams without lepton loops has been suppressed by mass ratios. The leading contribution carried out by Volkov [21], with a result that differs when the mass ratio (me=mf ) is small is [14] slightly from the result of Ref. [17]. Although the con- tending values differ by 4:8σ, the implications for ae are 2 2 [4:f] 1 α me not significant for current comparisons of theory and ex- ae ≈ 2 ; (9) 45 π mf periment; a resolution will be needed in the near future. 3 Today, experimental determinations of ge have at- The uncertainties are from the tenth-order QED term, tained sub-ppt precision|a stunning achievement. The [H08] hadronic term, and ae− , respectively. The inferred evolution of experimental technique up to 1972 is re- −1 value, α (ae) = 137:035 999 150(33), lies 0:104(43) × viewed in [22], which also contains a thorough historical 10−6 (2:4σ) above α−1(Cs) [18] and 0:056(35) × 10−6 summary of theoretical developments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Measurements of the Electron Magnetic Moment and the Fine Structure Constant
    S´eminaire Poincar´eXI (2007) 109 – 146 S´eminaire Poincar´e Probing a Single Isolated Electron: New Measurements of the Electron Magnetic Moment and the Fine Structure Constant Gerald Gabrielse Leverett Professor of Physics Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 1 Introduction For these measurements one electron is suspended for months at a time within a cylindrical Penning trap [1], a device that was invented long ago just for this purpose. The cylindrical Penning trap provides an electrostatic quadrupole potential for trapping and detecting a single electron [2]. At the same time, it provides a right, circular microwave cavity that controls the radiation field and density of states for the electron’s cyclotron motion [3]. Quantum jumps between Fock states of the one-electron cyclotron oscillator reveal the quantum limit of a cyclotron [4]. With a surrounding cavity inhibiting synchrotron radiation 140-fold, the jumps show as long as a 13 s Fock state lifetime, and a cyclotron in thermal equilibrium with 1.6 to 4.2 K blackbody photons. These disappear by 80 mK, a temperature 50 times lower than previously achieved with an isolated elementary particle. The cyclotron stays in its ground state until a resonant photon is injected. A quantum cyclotron offers a new route to measuring the electron magnetic moment and the fine structure constant. The use of electronic feedback is a key element in working with the one-electron quantum cyclotron. A one-electron oscillator is cooled from 5.2 K to 850 mK us- ing electronic feedback [5]. Novel quantum jump thermometry reveals a Boltzmann distribution of oscillator energies and directly measures the corresponding temper- ature.
    [Show full text]
  • Antihydrogen and the Antiproton Magnetic Moment
    Gabrielse ATRAP: Context and Status Antihydrogen and the Antiproton Magnetic Moment Gerald Gabrielse Spokesperson for TRAP and ATRAP at CERN Levere tt Pro fesso r o f Phys ics, Har var d Uni ver sit y Gabrielse Context CERN Pursues Fundamental Particle Physics at WWeveegySceseesghatever Energy Scale is Interesting A Long and Noble CERN Tradition 1981 – traveled to Fermilab “TEV or bust” 1985 – different response at CERN wh en I went th ere to try to get access to LEAR antiprotons for qqyg/m measurements and cold antihydrogen It is exciting that there is now • a dedicated storaggge ring for antih ygpydrogen experiments • four international collaborations • too few antiprotons for the demand Gabrielse Pursuing Fundamental Particle Physics atWhtt Whatever Energy Sca le is In teres ting A Long and Noble CERN Tradition 1986 – First trapped antiprotons (TRAP) 1989 – First electron-cooling of trapped antiprotons (TRAP) 1 cm magnetic field 21 MeV antiprotons slow in matter degrader _ + _ CERN’s AD, plus these cold methods make antihydrogen possible Gabrielse Pursuing Fundamental Particle Physics atWhtt Whatever Energy Sca le is In teres ting A Long and Noble CERN Tradition 1981 – traveled to Fermilab “TEV or bust” 1985 – different response at CERN when I went there to try to get access to LEAR antiprotons for q/m measurements and cold antihydrogen LHC: 7 TeV + 7 TeV AD: 5 MeV 100 times 5 x 1016 More trapped ELENA upgrade: 0.1 MeV antiprotons ATRAP: 0.3 milli-eV Gabrielse Physics With Low Energy Antiprotons First Physics: Compare q/m for antiproton
    [Show full text]
  • Trapped Antihydrogen in Its Ground State
    Trapped Antihydrogen in Its Ground State The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Richerme, Philip. 2012. Trapped Antihydrogen in Its Ground State. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10058466 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA ©2012 - Philip John Richerme All rights reserved. Thesis advisor Author Gerald Gabrielse Philip John Richerme Trapped Antihydrogen in Its Ground State Abstract Antihydrogen atoms (H) are confined in a magnetic quadrupole trap for 15 to 1000 s - long enough to ensure that they reach their ground state. This milestone brings us closer to the long-term goal of precise spectroscopic comparisons of H and H for tests of CPT and Lorentz invariance. Realizing trapped H requires charac- terization and control of the number, geometry, and temperature of the antiproton (p) and positron (e+) plasmas from which H is formed. An improved apparatus and implementation of plasma measurement and control techniques make available 107 p and 4 × 109 e+ for H experiments - an increase of over an order of magnitude. For the first time, p are observed to be centrifugally separated from the electrons that cool them, indicating a low-temperature, high-density p plasma. Determination of the p temperature is achieved through measurement of the p evaporation rate as their con- fining well is reduced, with corrections given by a particle-in-cell plasma simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard University Department of Physics Newsletter
    Harvard University Department of Physics Newsletter FALL 2014 COVER STORY Probing the Universe’s Earliest Moments FOCUS Early History of the Physics Department FEATURED Quantum Optics Where Physics Meets Biology Condensed Matter Physics NEWS A Reunion Across Generations and Disciplines 42475.indd 1 10/30/14 9:19 AM Detecting this signal is one of the most important goals in cosmology today. A lot of work by a lot of people has led to this point. JOHN KOVAC, HARVARD-SMITHSONIAN CENTER FOR ASTROPHYSICS LEADER OF THE BICEP2 COLLABORATION 42475.indd 2 10/24/14 12:38 PM CONTENTS ON THE COVER: Letter from the former Chair ........................................................................................................ 2 The BICEP2 telescope at Physics Department Highlights 4 twilight, which occurs only ........................................................................................................ twice a year at the South Pole. The MAPO observatory (home of the Keck Array COVER STORY telescope) and the South Pole Probing the Universe’s Earliest Moments ................................................................................. 8 station can be seen in the background. (Steffen Richter, Harvard University) FOCUS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Early History of the Physics Department ................................................................................ 12 AND CREDITS: Newsletter Committee: FEATURED Professor Melissa Franklin Professor Gerald Holton Quantum Optics ..............................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Newsletter – Wednesday, 29 July Neutrino Physics Flavour
    Daily Newsletter – Wednesday, 29 July The finale of a great conference in a wonderful related with the CKM-triangle. We expect city still has a lot to offer! Here comes the to see there the latest result published on overview. Monday in Nature Physics by the LHCb collaboration. The second presentation will summarise the rare decays and exotic Neutrino PhysiCs states, including information about the Sterile neutrinos with masses in different recently discovered pentaquark. Low energy ranges are physically very energy precision experiments, like interesting objects. Such neutrinos, with measurements of the lepton magnetic masses in the GeV range, could make an moment or studies using antihydrogen, important contribution to solving the will be summarised by Gerald Gabrielse. puzzle of matter-antimatter asymmetry in the universe, while keV-mass sterile neutrinos could constitute dark matter. Higgs and New PhysiCs The quest to find sterile neutrinos in the On the last day of the conference, two eV mass range, which might relieve talks will cover the experimental status of tensions in the findings of short baseline the search for new physics. experiments, is close to its end. The Supersymmetry is one of the best absolute neutrino mass scale of the three motivated extensions of the Standard standard neutrinos is still not known, Model and a first talk will provide though the possible range of the heaviest highlights of the searches for of the three has been narrowed down to supersymmetric particles performed so far the sub-eV range. The main objective of at the LHC. A second talk will give an experiments trying to find neutrinoless overview of the territory covered by the double beta decay is to discover whether LHC Run 1 searches for exotic neutrinos have Majorana nature, i.e., if experimental signatures in a large variety they are their own antiparticles.
    [Show full text]
  • Precision Pins Down the Electron's Magnetism
    CCOctELECTRON35-37 20/9/06 11:14 Page 35 PHYSICAL CONSTANTS Precision pins down the electron’s magnetism A measurement of the electron magnetic Dear Gerald…As one of the inventors [of QED], I remember that we thought of QED in 1949 as a temporary and jerry-built moment using the combination of several structure, with mathematical inconsistencies and renormalized leading-edge techniques has achieved new infinities swept under the rug. We did not expect it to last more than 10 years before some more solidly built theory would levels of accuracy, yielding a more precise replace it...Now, 57 years have gone by and that ramshackle structure still stands...It is amazing that you can measure her value for the fine structure constant. dance to one part per trillion and find her still following our beat. Gerald Gabrielse and David Hanneke With congratulations and good wishes for more such beautiful experiments, yours ever, Freeman Dyson. (Dyson 2006). describe this remarkable experiment. The electron’s magnetic moment has recently been measured to an of its low energy and by locating the electron in the centre of a accuracy of 7.6 parts in 1013 (Odom et al. 2006). As figure 1a microwave cavity. The damping time is typically about 10 seconds, (p36) indicates, this is a six-fold improvement on the last measure- about 1024 times slower than for a 104 GeV electron in the Large ment of this moment made nearly 20 years ago (Van Dyck et al. Electron–Positron collider (LEP). To confine the electron weakly we 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Phys. Rev. a (Rapid Comm.) 40, 481 (1989)
    Gabrielse 2006 Setting a Trap for Antimatter Gerald Gabrielse, ATRAP Spokesperson (CERN) Leverett Professor of Physics, Harvard Science and science fiction Warning: This Talk is Not About Science Fiction. Gabrielse Setting a Trap for Antimatter Support from NSF, AFOSR Matter and Antimatter? Particle and Atoms of Matter and Antimatter Annihilation Challenges Traps: Containers Without Walls Making Antimatter Atoms? Why Should We Do This? Gabrielse Where Did You Learn About Antimatter? Dr. Spock “knew” Antimatter annihilation Æ powered Star Trek space ship “Enterprise” “going boldly where no one had gone before” Gabrielse Generations of Trekies hardware: android software: hologram We study antimatter. How close are we to the Star Trek imagination? Gabrielse The Science Reality Behind the Science Fiction Imagination What is Matter? What is Antimatter? Gabrielse We Are Made of Matter Gabrielse Particles of Matter and Antimatter: Opposite and Identical charge mass Only measurements tell how identical Gabrielse Matter and Antimatter Atoms uncharged uncharged atom anti-atom Particle and antiparticle charges are opposite Both atoms are uncharged Æ same charge Gabrielse Gabrielse According to Physics as We Understand It Æ Looks Like the Whole Universe Could Have Been Made of Antimatter How would an antimatter universe be different? Why is our universe made of matter rather than antimatter? Gabrielse What Would I Look Like If I Were Made of Antimatter? • protons Æ antiprotons • neutrons Æ antineutrons • electrons Æ anti-electrons (positrons) ? Less
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Trapped Positrons and Progress to Cold Antihydrogen John Karl Estrada
    Cold Trapped Positrons and Progress to Cold Antihydrogen by John Karl Estrada Submitted to the Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY January 2002 c John Karl Estrada, MMII. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Author . ............................................................ Department of Physics January 31, 2002 Certified by. ....................................................... Gerald Gabrielse Professor of Physics, Harvard University Thesis Supervisor Certified by. ....................................................... Daniel Kleppner Lester Wolfe Professor of Physics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . ..................................................... Thomas J. Greytak Chairman, Department of Physics Graduate Committee Cold Trapped Positrons and Progress to Cold Antihydrogen by John Karl Estrada Submitted to the Department of Physics on January 31, 2002, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract A new physical mechanism for positron accumulation is explained and demonstrated. Strongly magnetized Rydberg positronium is formed and then ionized, allowing us to trap equal numbers of either positrons or electrons over a wide range of conditions. Antiprotons are trapped, cooled, and stacked from the new Antiproton Decelerator facility for the first time. Combining positrons and antiprotons, we have demonstrated the first positron cooling of antiprotons. The cooling takes place in a 4.2 K, nested Penning trap where conditions are ideal for the eventual goal of the formation of antihydrogen. Thesis Supervisor: Gerald Gabrielse Title: Professor of Physics, Harvard University Thesis Supervisor: Daniel Kleppner Title: Lester Wolfe Professor of Physics 2 Acknowledgments Iam grateful to have worked on an exciting and interesting research project.
    [Show full text]
  • Trapped Antihydrogen in Its Ground State
    Trapped Antihydrogen in Its Ground State A thesis presented by Philip John Richerme to The Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Physics Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2012 ©2012 - Philip John Richerme All rights reserved. Thesis advisor Author Gerald Gabrielse Philip John Richerme Trapped Antihydrogen in Its Ground State Abstract Antihydrogen atoms (H) are confined in a magnetic quadrupole trap for 15 to 1000 s - long enough to ensure that they reach their ground state. This milestone brings us closer to the long-term goal of precise spectroscopic comparisons of H and H for tests of CPT and Lorentz invariance. Realizing trapped H requires charac- terization and control of the number, geometry, and temperature of the antiproton (p) and positron (e+) plasmas from which H is formed. An improved apparatus and implementation of plasma measurement and control techniques make available 107 p and 4 × 109 e+ for H experiments - an increase of over an order of magnitude. For the first time, p are observed to be centrifugally separated from the electrons that cool them, indicating a low-temperature, high-density p plasma. Determination of the p temperature is achieved through measurement of the p evaporation rate as their con- fining well is reduced, with corrections given by a particle-in-cell plasma simulation. New applications of electron and adiabatic cooling allow for the lossless reduction in p temperature from thousands of Kelvin to 3.5 K or colder, the lowest ever reported. The sum of the 20 trials performed in 2011 in which p and e+ mix to form H in the presence of a magnetic quadrupole trap reveals a total of 105 ± 21 trapped H, or 5 ± 1 per trial on average.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Magnetic Dipole Moment
    Gabrielse Most Precise Tests of the Standard Model, Its Extensions and its Symmetries Gerald Gabrielse, Leverett Professor of Physics, Harvard University Spokesperson of the CERN ATRAP Collaboration Testing the Most Precise Prediction of the Standard Model Electron magnetic moment Testing standard model extensions Electron electric dipole moment Testing the Symmetries of the Standard Model Q/M for the antiproton and proton Antiproton and proton magnetic moments Positron and electron magnetic moments (underway) Antihydrogen and hydrogen structure (still in far future) Comparing Antimatter and Mater Gravity Gravitational Redshift of the Antiproton and Proton Supported by US NSF and AFOSR Gabrielse Low Energy Particle Physics AMO Physics, Particle Physics, Plasma Physics methods and funding goals and facility can’t avoid 2 2Mp c LEAR and AD 1010 TRAP 4.2 K 0.3 meV 70 mK, lowest storage energy for any charged particles Gabrielse Gabrielse Electron Magnetic Dipole Moment • Most precise prediction of the standard model • Most precisely measured property of an elementary particle • Most precise confrontation of theory and experiment • Greatest triumph of the standard model Gabrielse The Amazing Electron Electron orbits give atoms their size, but the electron itself may actually have no size 20000 electron masses 20 2 R2 10 m m* 10.3 TeV / c of binding energy for “ingredients” Electron has angular momentum (spin) even though it has no size and nothing is rotating: 2 S m R IA~ R2 Magnetic dipole moment: What about electric dipole? S S d d / 2 / 2 Gabrielse Standard Model of Prediction 2 3 4 5 e 1 CCCCC2 4 6 8 10 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Improved Test of the Standard Model's Most Precise Prediction
    atoms Article Towards an Improved Test of the Standard Model’s Most Precise Prediction G. Gabrielse 1,*, S. E. Fayer 1, T. G. Myers 1 and X. Fan 1,2 1 Center for Fundamental Physics, Northwestern University, 2233 Tech Drive, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; [email protected] (S.E.F.); [email protected] (T.G.M.); [email protected] (X.F.) 2 Department of Physics, Harvard University, 17 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA 01238, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 6 March 2019; Accepted: 10 April 2019; Published: 25 April 2019 Abstract: The electron and positron magnetic moments are the most precise prediction of the standard model of particle physics. The most accurate measurement of a property of an elementary particle has been made to test this result. A new experimental method is now being employed in an attempt to improve the measurement accuracy by an order of magnitude. Positrons from a “student source” now suffice for the experiment. Progress toward a new measurement is summarized. Keywords: standard model; electron; positron; magnetic moment; g value; fine structure constant; Penning trap 1. Introduction The Standard Model of Particle Physics (SM) is the great triumph and the great frustration of modern physics [1]. It is a great triumph because all laboratory tests of the SM have so far agreed with its predictions within measurement and calculation uncertainties. It is a great frustration because the SM and its symmetries are unable to account for basic properties of our universe. According to the SM, for example, the big bang would produce essentially equal numbers of matter and antimatter particles which would then annihilate as the universe cools.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinguished Alumni Award - Gera
    Calvin College - Spark - Fall 2006 - Distinguished Alumni Award - Gera... http://www.calvin.edu/publications/spark/2006/fall/gabrielse-gerald.htm Distinguished Alumni Award • Gerald Gabrielse '73 "Gerald Gabrielse's research specialty, antimatter, sounds more like the stuff of science fiction than nuclear physics. In fact, it is the combination of matter and antimatter that propels Star Trek 's fictional Starship Enterprise from galaxy to galaxy. Yet, Gabrielse '73 points out, his experimentation is actually the study of the simplest of particles. "We study just one electron or one antiproton or a few helium atoms at a time," he said. As simple as Gabrielse makes that sound, creating, separating, collecting and slowing the particles is about as complex a science venture as one can imagine. That's why it is performed in only a few places in the world. The Center for European Nuclear Research near Geneva, Switzerland, is one of those places and is where Gabrielse conducts his antimatter research. It is here that Gabrielse, the Leverett Professor of Physics at Harvard University, leads an international team of researchers called ATRAP (for antihydrogen trap). They study antimatter particles at about 455 degrees below zero. "We make antimatter and then look at it really closely to see if we can detect any differences between a proton and an antiproton (which has the opposite electrical charge)," he said. "In experiments at Harvard, we suspend one electron in empty space while we measure its properties." Gabrielse and his co-researchers' most recent achievement is the measuring of one electron's magnetic moment. "If you imagine that inside of each electron is a little bar magnet, then we were able to measure 1 of 3 5/26/2009 11:23 PM Calvin College - Spark - Fall 2006 - Distinguished Alumni Award - Gera..
    [Show full text]