DOCSLIB.ORG

Hell: Eternal Punishment Or Total Annihilation?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hell: Eternal Punishment Or Total Annihilation? THEOLOGY EVANGEL Summer 1992 19 HELL: ETERNAL PUNISHMENT OR TOTAL ANNIHILATION? Gerald Bray Sheol in the Old Testament departed spirits (Sheol) was presented as a shadowy underworld about which little could be known for Any consideration of the subject of Hell ought certain. It is true that the wicked were consigned naturally to begin with the Biblical evidence. This is there after death (cf. Num. 16:33; Job 24:19; Psa. 9:17) more extensive than many people realise, though and there are even hints from time to time that they much of what is classified under the term 'hell' in the would be eternally punished (Isa. 66:24--a verse Authorized Version refers to a state of the dead alluded to by Jesus in Mark 9:48). which is by no means necessarily the same as the But the OT also suggests that the righteous go to condition of punishment which we naturally associate Sheol (Psa. 16:10; 30:3; Isa. 38:10), though there is with this term. This has recently led to a number of some evidence tht they were treated differently from attempts to reconsider the Biblical evidence for the the wicked (cf. Psa. 28:3). Certainly the idea that traditional picture of Hell. Almost invariably these Sheol should be reserved exclusively for the wicked, have modified it in a way which makes the place of the as the modem concept of Hell maintains, cannot be departed seem considerably less fearsome. Whether supported from the Old Testament. There is no this softening has led to general public indifference to suggestion, for instance, that it is the abode of Satan, the concept of Hell, or been caused by it, is difficult to an idea which first appears in the First (Ethiopic) say, but it is certainly true that belief in any sort of book of Enoch, where he is given the name 'Semyaza' negative afterlife is now very rare outside Christian (6:3). That book, which was composed out of diverse circles and not very common even within them. elements sometime between 250 and 50 BC, is the In some ways this modem vagueness is a return to first to dwell on Sheol as a place of torment for the the Old Testament picture, where the place of souls of the 'Sons of God' who rebelled against the 20 EVANGEL Summer 1992 THEOLOGY Lord and were cast out of His presence. In this with the beast and the false prophet into a lake of context, the ancient place of departed spirits has been burning sulphur, where 'they will be tormented day assimilated to the Valley of Hinnom (Gehinnom or and night for ever and ever'. It is curious but true that later, Gehenna) which was the rubbish tip of Jerusalem this passage, taken together with Rev. 20:14, is the and represents a place where whatever is cast into it only time that the Bible suggests that Satan and is burnt by fire. Hades are directly linked-and both are being con­ That this fate did not necessarily await human sumed by fire in a place not previously mentioned! sinners can be inferred from the fact that there is no The witness of Revelation is important for the belief mention anywhere that anything like this befell that Hades is a kind of intermediate state between Adam after his fall from grace. We are told in I Peter death and the last judgement. It is notoriously 3:18 that there were spirits who were imprisoned in difficult to square this with the promise of eternal life the days of Noah, but it is not clear what was made by Jesus and repeated by the Apostle Paul as happening to them when Jesus went to preach to his own personal hope (Phil. 1:21), but the usual them. They were obviously in prison, which must solution is to say that 'death and Hades' are to be have involved some kind of punishment, but nothing understood as temporal concepts, whereas eternal is said about the torments of the damned mentioned life is by definition outside time. If that is so, of in Enoch. Neither is it known whether the preaching course, Hades cannot be regarded as a place of of Christ released them from their imprisonment or eternal torment, since at the end of time it will cease merely confirmed the justice of it! to exist! Sheol (Hades) in the New Testament The Abyss The New Testament picture of Hell is considerably The closest we come in the NT to a dwelling-place for richer than anything found in the Old Testament, Satan roughly equivalent to our notion of Hell is in though the number of overall references is approxi­ the use of the term 'abyss', an adjective meaning mately the same in proportion to the text-22 or 23, 'bottomless' and generally used to translate the as compared with 65 in the OT, which is three times Hebrew word Tehom. In the OT it occurs as a as long. Particularly noticeable is the heavy concen­ synonym for Sheol (Psa. 71:20; 107:26), a usage which tration of these references in the Gospels, and on the is also found in Paul (Rom. 10:7f.). In the NT however lips of Jesus Himself (15 of the total, of which four are it can also designate a prison for demons (Luke 8:31) references to Hades and 11 to Gehenna). from which smoke rises, at least metaphorically (Rev. It is generally agreed by commentators that Hades 9:1). The ruler of the Abyss is an angel called is the nearest equivalent to the OT Shea!, though it is Abaddon in Hebrew and A pollyon in Greek (Rev. not at all clear how this differs in practice from 9:11). Whether this angel is to be identified with Gehenna, which is a place of torment. Luke 16:23 Satan or not is a matter of controversy, particularly as refers to Hades as the place from which Dives, in his he is protrayed as being bound in the Abyss for a agony, glimpses the blessedness of Lazarus in Heaven, thousand years (Rev. 20:1,3). There is no doubt that and Matt. 11:23 (paralleled in Luke 10:15) refers to it the abyss is a prison which suits his true character, as the place of punishment for the unbelief of and which prevents him from roaming freely to and Capernaum. The only other reference to Hades in the fro in the earth. But as the point of the passage is that Gospels comes in Matt. 16:18, where Jesus tells us believers are protected from Satan's power only for that 'the gates of Hell' will not prevail against the the duration of the thousand-year reign, the Abyss is Church. This might be taken to mean that Hell has an unlikely spot for his permanent residence. If Satan some kind of adversarial role vis-a-vis the Church, is the prince of this world, who is normally free to which would make it an appropriate dwelling-place deceive men and women within it, it is hard to see for Satan, but this is not clear from the text. It is more how he can be relegated permanently to the Abyss, likely to be saying that death and destruction will which is a place cut off from this world, and whose have no power over the Church, which will stand as angel-prince is a destroyer, not merely a deceiver. an eternal witness to the power and majesty of God. The link between Hades and death is brought out Gehenna clearly in the remaining NT references. Acts 2:27 and 2:31 are simply a quotation from Psa. 16:10, and This word occurs 12 times in the NT, all but once portray Hades as a place of decay and corruption. (Jam. 3:6) in the Gospels. The 11 Gospel references The same can be said of I Cor. 15:55 (where the can be reduced to five, once repetitions are taken into reading 'Hades' is inferior to 'death', the word which account, but all of these clearly indicate a place of is now preferred in most translations of the NT) and punishment and destruction, mainly by fire. This is by the four references in Revelation (1:18; 6:8; 20:13 clear for example in the three references in Matt. 5 and 20:14) all of which are formulaic-'death and (vv. 22, 29 and 30, the last two of which are paralleled Hell', which start off as a condition of imprisonment in Mark 9:43 and 45), as well as in Matt. 10:28 for the dead, give them up for judgement and are (paralleled in Luke 12:5) and Matt. 18:9 (paralleled in themselves condemned to 'the lake of fire'. What is Mark 9:47). The remaining two references mention this? The image of fire would suggest Gehenna, but the Pharisees, who are described as 'sons of Hell' that is not clearly stated. An alternative interpetation (Matt. 23:15) to which they will be condemned (Matt. is that the fire is one of total annihilation, though that 23:33). It will be seen from the above that Matthew's contradicts Rev. 20:10, where Satan is thrown along is the Gospel which contains the full range of THEOLOGY EVANGEL Summer 1992 21 references to Gehenna, and that the three references build a doctrine of eternal punishment! Nor is it clear in Mark all occur in the same passage.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Limbo's Not a Thing, Right?
    Limbo’s Not a Thing, Right? Is Limbo just another name for purgatory? Nope! So what is Limbo, and what does the Church say about it? Let’s find out! Purgatory and Limbo can sound like the same Church teaching—but they’re not. Purgatory is a state of purification for those who have died imperfect but in a state of grace. Once they are purified, they enter the joy of heaven. This is a doctrine of the Church—which means that all Catholics are required to believe it. So what’s Limbo? Limbo is a speculation that some theologians began to suggest as early as the Medieval Ages, as a “place” where the souls of unbaptized infants might go after death. This theory honored two fundamental Catholic teachings: 1) that God desires salvation for all and 2) that to enter heaven, one must be free from original sin. Because Limbo was speculation, not doctrine, the Church never defined it as official teaching nor does she officially use the term “Limbo” in any of her documents. In his book What Catholics Really Believe: 52 Answers to Common Misconceptions About the Catholic Faith, Karl Keating says that most theologians today (Pope Benedict XVI, for example) “see no need for limbo, suggesting that God provides some way for unbaptized infants to make a decision for or against him immediately after death.” What we do know for certain is that our God is a God of mercy and love who wants every one of His children to join Him in Heaven. We can trust everything and everyone to Him.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradise - Purgatory - Perdition
    PARADISE - PURGATORY - PERDITION A short time before the Lord Jesus Christ went to the cross of Calvary to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself, He said, concerning His disciples: “While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Thy name: those that Thou gavest Me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of PERDITION: that the Scripture might he fulfilled:” John 17:12. Judas Iscariot was “the son of perdition.” Then note II Thessalonians 2:3: “Let no man deceive you by any means; for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of PERDITION.” The coming of the “man of sin” will also be “the son of perdition.” Then note Revelation 17:8: “The beast that thou sawest was and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottom less pit, and go into PERDITION: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world, when they, behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.” Then we read in Hebrews 10:39 and II Peter 3:7 concerning some who shall go to perdition: “But we are not of them who draw back unto PERDITION; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.” “But the heavens and the earth which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and PERDITION of ungodly men.” PARADISE When the Lord Jesus was dying on the cross, a thief near by on another cross called on Him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earth and the Waters in Genesis 1 and 2: a Linguistic Investigation, by David Toshio Tsumura
    136 Journal of Biblical Literature The principal shortcoming of this book is that it does not adequately take into account the results of the current Israeli excavations at Shiloh. Schley dismisses "the claimed (emphasis mine) archaeological evidence for a massive destruction of the site during Iron I" without reviewing the evidence, and he takes refuge in the position that "Iron I extends from the end of the thirteenth century BCE to the middle of the tenth, and an Iron I destruction layer theoretically could occur at any time during this period" (p. 196). Unfortunately, the work is marred by numerous typographical errors and several inconsistencies in transliterations. Still, it is a valuable study which merits the careful attention of scholars. Carl D. Evans University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 The Earth and the Waters in Genesis 1 and 2: A Linguistic Investigation, by David Toshio Tsumura. JSOTSup 83. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1989. Pp. 201. ?22.50 ($33.50). The first two chapters of Genesis raise innumerable problems for the student of biblical literature. Not the least of these are the basic meaning and etymology of five key words (tohu, bohu, teh6m, 'ed, 'eden), the relationship between these Hebrew concepts and proposed Near Eastern parallels, and the overall issue of earth and waters in the stories of creation. These questions form the basis of David Tsumura'smonograph. As the book's sub- heading suggests, the author is interested mainly in presenting the linguistic evidence relating to these issues. Only after a thorough investigation along these lines, he believes, can biblical scholars then proceed to the larger issues of theology and mythico-religious thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrews University SEMINARY S1UDIES
    Andrews University SEMINARY S1UDIES Volume 37 cSpring. 1999 Number 1 Andrews University Press ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES The Journal of the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary of Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan 49104, U.S.A. Editor: NANCY J. VYHMEISTER Associate Editor: JERRY MOON Book Review Editor: JERRY MOON Consulting Editors: ROBERT M. JOHNSTON, JON PAULIEN, RANDALL W. YOLTNKER Copy Editor: LEONA G. RUNNING Book Review Assistant: JOSE E. GUZMAN Circulation Manager: Jost E. GUZMAN Office Manager: KAREN K. ABRAHAMSON Editorial Assistant: KAREN K. ABRAHAMSON Editorial and Circulation Offices: Andrews University Seminary Studies, Seminary Hall, Andrews University Berrien Springs, MI 49104-1500, U.S.A. Phone: (616) 471-6023 Fax: (616) 471-6202 Electronic Mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.andrews.edu/—auss A refereed journal, ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES provides a scholarly venue, within the context of biblical faith, for the presentation of research in the area of religious and biblical studies. AUSS publishes research articles and brief notes on the following topics: biblical archaeology and history of antiquity; Hebrew Bible; New Testament; church history of all periods; historical, biblical, and systematic theology; ethics; history of religions; and missions. Selected research articles on ministry and Christian education may also be included. The opinions expressed in articles, brief notes, book reviews, etc., are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors nor those of the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary. Subscription Information: ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES is published in the Spring and the Autumn. The subscription rates for 1999 are as follows: U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Symbolic Structure of Andrew Lytle's the Velvet Horn
    The Kentucky Review Volume 5 | Number 1 Article 3 Fall 1983 The yS mbolic Structure of Andrew Lytle's The Velvet Horn Anne Foata Université des Sciences Humaines, France Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits oy u. Recommended Citation Foata, Anne (1983) "The yS mbolic Structure of Andrew Lytle's The Velvet Horn," The Kentucky Review: Vol. 5 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review/vol5/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Kentucky Libraries at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Kentucky Review by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Symbolic Structure of Andrew Lytle's The Velvet Horn Anne Foata Implied in the very title of The Velvet Horn and emphasized throughout the narrative by the mythic allusions of its central intelligence, a network of symbolic representations, all bearing upon the central image of edenic wholeness, is intricately interwoven in the narrative structure of Andrew Lytle's noveJ.l Their purpose is to confer the authenticity and immutability of an archetypal experience on the limited events of both the main and the secondary (or "enveloping") actions of the novel (the story of Lucius Cree's initiation into manhood and of his mother and uncle's fall from innocence some twenty years earlier), to draw them out of the human time and endow them with eternal significance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reality of Hell
    THE REALITY OF HELL Bob Ross Is there a place of literal fire where lost sinners will be confined throughout eternity? “HELL” • “SHEOL” • “HADES” • “GEHENNA” • “TARTARUS” The Bible was written in three languages: Hebrew (Old Testament), Chaldee (por- tion of Daniel), and Greek (New Testament). The Bible that we have today is a translation of the Hebrew, Chaldee, and Greek writings into our language. There are many transla- tions of the Bible, the most popular being the King James Version, which you probably own. The Word “Hell” in the King James Version There are four words in the KJV translated “hell.” Of these four words, only one of them is used in the Old Testament. That word is the Hebrew word “Sheol.” In the New Testament, the three words translated “hell” are “hades,” “gehenna,” and “tartarus,” all Greek words. What do these words mean? 1. The Hebrew word “sheol” is translated as follows. “Hell”—31 times, as in Psalm 9:17: “The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.” “Grave”—31 times, as in Ecclesiastes 9:10: “Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.” “Pit”—3 times, as in Job 17:16: “They shall go down to the bars of the pit, when our rest together is in the dust.” But actually, the Hebrew word “sheol” does not mean either “hell,” “grave,” or “pit.” It means “the unseen world” or “the place of departed spirits.” Notice how it is de- fined: Strong’s Hebrew and Chaldee Dictionary says that “sheol” is “the world of the dead.” Young’s Analytical Concordance says that “sheol” is “the unseen state.” Smiths Bible Dictionary says that “sheol” is “always the abode of departed spirits.” Fausset’s Bible Dictionary and Encyclopedia says that “sheol” is “the common re- ceptacle of the dead.” So sheol does not strictly refer to hell, but to the place of departed spirits, irrespec- tive of whether saved or lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Babylonian Influence on the Bible
    BABYLONIAN INFLUENCE ON THE BIBLE AND POPULAR BELIEFS THE CONFLICT OF MERODACH, THE GOD OF LIGHT, WITH TI.AMAT, THE DRAGON OF CHAOS (see pp. 17, 35). {From tile Or/g·inal in tlie Britislt .lllfuseum} Stubies on :fl3iblical $ubject~. No. I. BABYLONIAN INFLUENCE ON THE BIBLE AND POPULAR BELIEFS: "TEHUM AND TIAMAT," "HADES AND SATAN." A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GENESIS I. 2. BY A. SMYTHE PALMER, D.D., AUTHOR OF HA MISUNDERSTOOD MIRACLE/' "FOLK-ETYMOLOGY, "THE WORD•HUNTER~S NOTE-HOOK/' ETC. VICAR OF HOLY TRINITY, HEHMON HILL, WANSTEAD. LONDON: DAVID NUTT, 270-271, S'l'RAND. 1897. Printed by BALLANTYNE, HANSON &, Co. At the Ballantyne Press 5. 'IR. 3-n token or sincere respect an~ gratltu~e CONTENTS PAGE THE BABYLONIAN CRADLE-LAND TEHOM AND TIA.MAT 4 THE CREATION 8 THE PRIMEYAL CITAOS 10 CON~'LICT Bl<!TWEEN 'l'IAMAT AND MERODACH 14 THE SERPENT 23 DRAGONS OF THE BIBLE 37 THE SEA A REBELLIOUS POWER 41 THE WATERY HAD1'JS-TARTAROS • 48 THE DEEP AS HELL 55 PUNISHMENT OF THE REBEL HOST 62 THE ABYSS 66 Dl<JSERTS AS THE HAUNTS OF DEVILS 72 THE EUPHRATES AS A SPIRLT RIVER 76 CONCLUSION 80 APPENDIX A. PHENOMENAL DRAGONS 87 B. MERODACH .AND THE THU~DERBOL'l' 98 C. THE SOLAR CONFLICT , I06 D. THE SERPENT ORACULAR I06 E. NEPTUNE SATANIC I09 F. '' TEHOM" ro9 G. THE SPIRIT-DEEP • 109 H. OUR DEBT TO BA.BYLON IJQ TEXTS ILLUSTRATED PAGE PAGE Gen. i. 2 4 8. 24, 66 Jer. v. 22. 43 i. 21 . 33, 41 I. 34 35 Lev.
    [Show full text]
  • De-Demonising the Old Testament
    De-Demonising the Old Testament An Investigation of Azazel , Lilith , Deber , Qeteb and Reshef in the Hebrew Bible Judit M. Blair Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 2008 Declaration I declare that the present thesis has been composed by me, that it represents my own research, and that it has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. ______________________ Judit M. Blair ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people to thank and acknowledge for their support and help over the past years. Firstly I would like to thank the School of Divinity for the scholarship and the opportunity they provided me in being able to do this PhD. I would like to thank my ‘numerous’ supervisors who have given of their time, energy and knowledge in making this thesis possible: To Professor Hans Barstad for his patience, advice and guiding hand, in particular for his ‘adopting’ me as his own. For his understanding and help with German I am most grateful. To Dr Peter Hayman for giving of his own time to help me in learning Hebrew, then accepting me to study for a PhD, and in particular for his attention to detail. To Professor Nick Wyatt who supervised my Masters and PhD before his retirement for his advice and support. I would also like to thank the staff at New College Library for their assistance at all times, and Dr Jessie Paterson and Bronwen Currie for computer support. My fellow colleagues have provided feedback and helpful criticism and I would especially like to thank all members of HOTS-lite I have known over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of Catherine Keller's Position T
    Emily Linthicum Boston College School of Theology and Ministry Existential Chaos: A Critique of Catherine Keller’s Position Towards Creation and Divine Omnipotence Abstract The two dominant concepts Catherine Keller examines in her study of creatio ex profundis, creation out of chaos, are the feminine tehomic language and refutation of divine omnipotence. She studies both these concepts through a feminist lens as well as with an overarching question as to why creatio ex nihilo, creation from nothing, has commandeered the thought behind Genesis exegesis and creation theology. Using various literary styles, both religious and secular, Keller attempts to deconstruct creation out of nothing and argue how a theology of becoming is more appropriate given the language of Genesis and creation as a whole. Rather than merely substitute the present masculine understandings of God and creation with the feminine, she persuades for a return to the foundation of tehomic language in an effort to reconstruct the negative feminine connotations of chaos and support a theology of becoming without a “divine dominology.” The purpose of this paper is to offer an examination of Keller’s text and counterarguments to her understanding of creatio ex nihilo and ex profundis. There are various examples of male dominant thought in theology throughout history; however, divine omnipotence, both in general and as associated with creation theology, is not an affront to the feminine and creatio ex profundis. Keller’s fault does not lie in the notion of creatio ex profundis and its validity; rather, her argument concerning the domineering power of divine omnipotence and its association with creatio ex nihilo remains insufficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Lit the Fires of Hell? a Sermon on Matthew 5:21-37 by Nathan Nettleton, 12 February 2017 © Laughingbird.Net
    Who Lit the Fires of Hell? A sermon on Matthew 5:21-37 by Nathan Nettleton, 12 February 2017 © LaughingBird.net Message We make a devilish mistake when we project the origins of hell onto God. Jesus calls us to follow him into a new way of life that will save us from plunging into the hells of our own making. Sermon One of the many things that the new stage musical, The Book of Mormon, makes fun of is the Mormons’ beliefs about hell. But actually, the Mormons beliefs about hell are not much different from what a lot of Christians believe. Hell has not featured much in my preaching to date, and I could perhaps be accused of avoiding the topic, but I think I have to say something about it tonight. In the version of the New Testament that I mostly use (NRSV), the word “hell” appears 13 times, and three of them were in tonight’s gospel reading. If you are one of those who firmly believes that every word of the Bible is to be taken literally in its plain and simple sense, then these references to hell are definitely bad news. They certainly are for me anyway. Maybe not you. But at face value, since I have been known to call someone a fool, I am “liable to the hell of fire”, and since I haven’t either plucked out my eyes or cut off my hands which have, on occasions, been known to participate in my sinful thoughts or sinful actions, I am in danger of my whole body being thrown into hell.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Orthodox Theology
    EASTERN ORTHODOX THEOLOGY I. INTRODUCTION AMONG all the secondary disciplines and auxiliary sciences of Sacred Theology, probably none is so widely neglected as that branch of Comparative Theology which treats of the differences of faith and practice between Catholics and Eastern Orthodox. There are multiple reasons for such neglect, and the neglect has not been very conscious or intentional. Some reasons why this branch has been neglected in the past are: seminary schedules are already very crowded; the the- ology professors are often burdened with other assignments of teach- ing, preaching or parochial activities, leaving a minimum of leisure for research in matters not immediately pertinent to their classes; and up to now there has been no treatise in this field written in Eng- lish —in fact, any depth of research in Oriental Theology will involve the reading of source material in the more recondite tongues such as Modern Greek, Russian and Roumanian. While it is true that fundamentally the Orthodox are very close to the Catholics and that only a few points of disagreement between them are of importance, yet there is a fairly wide area of discrepancy in view-point, in emphasis, in accidentals that provides material for controversy between the theologians of both churches. A course in all these matters is given by the present writer in Fordham's Russian In- stitute. It is a thirty-hour course, that is, two hours a week for one semester. It is obvious therefore that in a paper of this kind it will not be possible to do more than give a survey of the points of contro- versy and go more thoroughly into a few of the most important questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Hell in Islamic Studies
    CHAPTER � Introducing Hell in Islamic Studies Christian Lange In regard to the afterlife, scholars of Islam in the West have demonstrated a remarkably irenic temper, preferring to give far more attention to paradise than to hell. The Islamic hell, for the most part, has been viewed as no more than the mirror image of paradise, an ugly reflection of the beauties and the joys in heaven. Consequently, it has been considered a phenomenon of secondary logical and ontological order, as well as interest. The few general overviews of Islamic eschatology largely bypass the infernal regions,1 and the dedicated studies of the Islamic paradise, of which there are a fair number,2 cannot be said to be paralleled by the same number of scholarly forays into the Islamic hell.3 While the entry on paradise in the second edition of the Encyclopaedia of Islam (1954–2005) counts eleven columns in the printed edition, its entry 1 The most widely cited studies of this kind are Smith/Haddad, Islamic understanding, and El-Saleh, La vie future, each of whom pays much less attention to hell than to paradise. Also shorter overviews tend in this direction. See, for example, the classic study by Meier, The ultimate origin; or the stimulating essay by Reinhart, The here and the hereafter. 2 Al-Azmeh, Rhetoric for the senses; Lange, Paradise in the Islamic religious imagination; Lohlker/Nowak, Das islamische Paradies; MacDonald, Islamic eschatology—VI; Raven, A Kitāb al-ʿAẓama; Rosenthal, Reflections on love; Schimmel, The celestial garden. See also the numerous studies of aspects of paradise in the Quran, for example Horovitz, Das koranische Paradies; Jenkinson, Rivers of paradise; Lange, The discovery of paradise; Neuwirth, Reclaiming paradise lost; O’Shaughnessy, Eschatological themes, 76–107; Tubach, Schönheiten; Wendell, The denizens of paradise.
    [Show full text]